That even President Obama's political
allies are attacking him over the healthcare law underlines the challenge
facing his signature domestic achievement.
What is stated is unwitting evidence that this
world is all about image, putting on a show, impressing and pleasing others,
not substance.
What matters is not whether Obamacare is dragging
down the president but whether it is right or wrong, meaningful or meaningless,
true or false and these are not about dragging anybody down. It is only if you
are presenting a false image of yourself, you are concerned with images,
concerned about impressing others that you are concerned that it is dragging
you down. If you are not concerned about images, what is there to be dragged
down?
PUTTING ON A SHOW, MAINTAINING AN IMAGE IS THE
PREOCCUPATION OF DELUDED PEOPLE WITH STYLE HERE, WHATEVER THEY DO OR SAY, THEY
ALSO WANT TO IMPRESS YOU, MAINTAIN AN IMAGE OF THEMSELVES TO YOU AND THEY ARE
CONCERNED THAT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE HAVE DAMAGED THEIR IMAGES RATHER THAN
WHETHER IT WAS RIGHT OR WRONG, USEFUL OR USELESS. RATHER THAN DWELLING ON THE
DRAGGING DOWN OF THE PRESIDENT YOU SHOULD DWELL ON THE HARM NOT TO THE
PRESIDENT’S IMAGE BUT TO THE SYSTEM AS A RESULT OF THE INCOMPETENCE.
BECAUSE IT IS WRONG/MAD TO FOCUS ON THE DAMAGE TO
THE PRESIDENT’S IMAGE AND YOU THINK IT IS THE ISSUE, YOU ARE PRACTICING
CONTROLLED INSANITY, YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION THAT ENDS IN INSANITY AND THAT
IS NOT THE PATH TO HEAVEN.
It is not the president’s prestige but
what harm is done:
The matter of the poor execution of Obamacare is
not about damage to the president’s prestige, it matters nothing unless you
have a big ego or pride but what matter is what harm or damage is done to the
system and the public as a result of the ‘cockup’.
THE PERSON IS BARKING UP THE WRONG TREE (HAS HIS
PRIORITY ALL WRONG) THAT ENDS IN MADNESS. THE MATTER IS NOT DAMAGE TO THE
PRESIDENT’S PRESTIGE BUT DAMAGE TO THE SYSTEM AND PUBLIC.
He is a closet Obama critic:
It is never without reason why someone chooses to
focus on the damage done the president’s prestige rather than what wrong is
happening.
He wants to highlight and beat the drum of negative
publicity because he is a concealed opponent or closet Obama hater and wants to
discredit him.
MANY WILL NOT REVEAL THEIR INCLINATIONS BUT THE
WISE CAN DISCERN FROM WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY THEIR LIKELY IF NOT CERTAIN TRUE
SENTIMENTS.
Wednesday, 13 November 2013
|
I sometimes wonder whether Malaysians are really concerned about
corruption, abuse of power, wastage of public funds, and whatnot, or whether
they just want to politicise issues to gain votes and win elections. Is this
really about improving the country or about making the other person look bad
so that you can get into power?
|
If RPK thinks Anwar/ Lim Kit Siang et al are politicizing
corruption then he is densely deluded. Whether Anwar is merely politicizing
corruption for vested gains or he is truly a crusader wanting to cleanse the
system is not subjective but objective and if he perceives it is mostly about
politicising that rectification, he has wrong perception that ends in mad
perception.
It is wrong and sinful to wonder:
It is not right but wrong to wonder whether
Malaysians are politicizing corruption. The evidence is there, you do not need
to supernatural powers to determine whether it is genuine concern for
corruption or politicking and if you still can’t tell and you have to resort to
wonder then you are a fool, do not understand what you see.
WHETHER ANWAR OR LIM KIT SIANG IS POLITICISING
CORRUPTION OR CONCERNED ABOUT CORRUPTION IS THERE TO BE SEEN BY THOSE WHO ARE
DISCERNING, THERE IS NO NEED FOR WONDER EXCEPT IF YOU ARE A QUESTIONING FOOL.
EITHER YOU KNOW OR YOU DON’T AND IF YOU DON’T JUST
SHUT UP AND QUIT WONDERING FOR YOUR OWN GOOD AND SANITY.
This statement is false and incurs karma to be
repaid as suffering. Not everyone has a price, can be bought even if you and
many cynical avaricious people do and so you are speaking falsely maliciously
to say everyone has a price. The statement implies acceptance and upholding of
the cynical, callous attitude that it is all about money, how much can you pay
me to do your bidding and this invites divine punishment.
NOT EVERYONE HAS A PRICE EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE
HERE DO AND SO YOU ARE SPEAKING FALSE UNNECESSARILY TO SANCTION A MERCENARY
ATTITUDE THAT HAS DEBT TO BE REPAID BY SUFFERING.
Robert
Shiller: The
necessity for approximation is much stronger in economics than other sciences,
especially given that its models describe people rather than particles
What matters is not whether economics is a science
or not but is it true (correct) or not.
Economics is about theories or concepts and they
are thought constructions that are false and inherently so because the minds
that created them are deluded.
YOU CANNOT EXPECT DELUDED MINDS WARPED BY FORCE TO
HAVE TRUE THOUGHTS THAT LEAD TO THE TRUTH. ECONOMICS IS ABOUT THEORIES AND
THEORIES ARE ALWAYS FALSE. REALITY OR TRUTH IS NOT A THEORY WHICH IS SOMETHING
FABRICATED OR FALSE TO EXPLAIN OBSERVED PHENOMENA.
SIMILARLY SCIENCE TOO IS FALSE, IT IS ABOUT
THEORIES FABRICATED BY DELUDED MINDS TO EXPLAIN PHYSICAL OR OBSERVED PHENOMENA
AND PRECISE MEASUREMENTS OF PHENOMENA TO PROVE REALITY OR THE TRUTH.
THE TRUTH IS NOT MEASURED BUT TO BE SEEN BY THOSE
WHO ARE CAPABLE OF SEEING THINGS AS THEY ACTUALLY ARE.
TRUTH SOMETHING YOU EITHER SEE OR YOU DON’T, THERE
IS NO NEED TO MEASURE AND IF YOU NEED TO MEASURE WHAT YOU ARE ENGAGED IS NOT
THE TRUTH BUT FALSE LIKE THE BLIND MAN WHO CANNOT SEE THE ELEPHANT TRYING TO
KNOW THE ELEPHANT BY FEELING IT. NO MATTER HOW YOU FEEL OR TOUCH THE ELEPHANT
YOU WILL NEVER SEE IT AS IT ACTUALLY IS.
Science is never the truth:
Science is not the truth otherwise it would be
called the truth not science.
Truth is not a theory and you do not arrive at the
truth by measuring but you arrive at the truth by seeing it as it actually.
Because men never see things as they actually are, what they see is fatally
tainted by greed, ill will and delusion, they can never hope to see the truth
and in their deluded quest to know the truth, they resort to fabricating
theories and measuring phenomena to prove their theories are true, that nature
conforms to their theories.
IF SCIENCE IS THE TRUTH, IT WOULD NOT BE CALLED
SCIENCE BUT THE TRUTH.
HOW TRUE CAN YOUR SCIENCE BE WHEN OBJECTS CAN
DISAPPEAR AND REAPPEAR INSTANTLY WITHOUT CAUSING AN ATOMIC EXPLOSION THAT
SCIENCE PREDICTS ACCORDING TO EINSTEIN.
THE BUDDHA CAN MAKE A MAN DISAPPEAR AND SO THAT
DISAPPEARANCE IN MASS SHOULD CAUSE A MASSIVE EXPLOSION ACCORDING TO SCIENCE.
Why do you need to invent and study
economics?
Economics does not exist unlike you and me,
economics is a concoction of (deluded) humans not based on a true need but
based on greed or blind stirred force. It is because mankind seeks to live
materially at the limit, with the economy at the boil but not enough to scald
you or to cool to too low a level, and there are dangers that overextension,
overleverage and build up of debt could fatally kill the economy that he needs
to invent and device perimeters that he thinks enables him to monitor the
health of the economy that he is anxious to keep healthy more than his own
life.
IT IS BECAUSE MANKIND SEEKS TO LIVE GREEDILY AND
DANGEROUSLY AT THE LIMIT, LIVE DEPENDENT ON DEBT THAT MAY POTENTIALLY KILL IT
THAT HE NEEDS TO STUDY ECONOMICS, TO INVENT AND MONITOR PERIMETERS LIKE
INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC HEALTH TO ENABLE HIM IN HIS DELUSION TO STEER THE
ECONOMY IN PERMANENT GOLDILOCKS, NOT TOO HOT NOT TOO COLD.
THUS THE BASIS OF ECONOMICS IS NOT TRUE REASON BUT
GREED, THE NEED TO LIVE DANGEROUSLY AT THE LIMITS.
IF A COMMUNITY LIVE WITHIN ITS MEANS WITH PLENTY OF
SAVINGS AND RESERVES IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT ECONOMIC THEORIES,
SUPPLY AND DEMAND, USING INTEREST RATES AS A TOOL TO RAISE OR LOWER THE
ECONOMY, ETC.
All friendliness is faked, programmed:
Friendliness is not something that is natural, it
is something you must tell yourself to do, to behave in a certain manner that
would be viewed as friendly and it is always work and suffering and not without
unsavoury motives that may be denied or unconscious.
Suffice you do not harbour ill will, wish to harm
and trouble others, no one is truly, naturally friendly, it is something
conditioned or programmed in some to get on and get what the person wants from
others and involved a programmed robotic existence that is suffering to self
and suffering to those who have the misfortune to be the recipient of such for
show motivated friendliness. If you perceive such friendliness as genuine and
lovely then you are in danger of being deceived with even deadly consequences.
THERE IS NEVER ANY TRUE REASONS FOR ANYONE TO BE
FRIENDLY BECAUSE IT INVOLVES WORK THAT IS SUFFERING. IF SOMEONE IS IN DISTRESS
OR TROUBLE, YOU ASSIST HIM IF YOU WANT, THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM BEING FRIENDLY.
IF YOU ARE HEADED FOR ENDLESS WOES AND I POINT THE WAY OUT OF SUFFERING AS IT
IS ACTUALLY POSSIBLE THAT IS NOT BECAUSE I AM FRIENDLY BUT I HAVE COMPASSION OR
CARE FOR YOU.
AND HOW DO PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD FALSELY SHOW
FRIENDLINESS? BY A READY SMILE, EAGERNESS IN THEIR ACTIONS AND SPEECH, ASKING
BURDENSOME USELESS QUESTIONS AS IF THEY ARE VERY INTERESTED OR CONCERNED WITH
YOU.
Only a fool will speak of ‘as I was saying’ which
is irrelevant, for show, diversion from the matter at hand.
There is never a need to say, as I was saying and
if you think it is needed you may be right or deluded, beating around the bush,
heading for insanity. Further it reflects self-identity views, it is not you
saying that is important but what truth or good is being said.
The Buddha speaks but he never refers to a self
that speaks and only conceited, egotistic men are proud to always refer to
themselves, to gain credit for themselves.
This is what you are instructed to do and you
cannot know if it is true or false, if it will work for you or not and so you
must undertake with uncertainty, with doubt whether it will work or not or you
are doing something silly, does not work.
The benefits of never undertaking something you do
not know, even if an expert, a doctor tells you is far greater than the
drawbacks of BLINDLY undertaking something that must stir resistance that leads
to stress and conditions to stress and makes you an obedient robot following
what others tell you that you cannot see is true.
The doctor may think nothing, think he is good but
he is undertaking karma to be experienced as future suffering trying to boss
other people’s lives and making robots out of them and training them to resist
and stress themselves.
BETTER YOU DIE EARLIER BUT FREE OF STRESS, FREE
FROM BEING A ROBOT THAN YOU LIVE ON IN RESISTANCE AND STRESS BEING A ROBOT
CLINGING TO YOUR LIFE OF SUFFERING HERE.
Not by force nor a plan does anyone
escape suffering or death:
In order to walk to escape strokes you must use
force that is blind and harmful and walking longer not faster is a plan and not
by either or in combination does any man truly escape suffering or death but it
is by achieving increasingly the higher states.
THE ONLY TRUE AND CERTAIN ESCAPE FROM DEATH AND
SUFFERING ARE THE HIGHER STATES OF MINDS AND YOU ACHIEVE THEM BY WEANING
YOURSELF OFF FORCE NOT USING FORCE.
STOP USING FORCE TO PROLONG (SYLLABLES) CHANGE
SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND YOU ACHIEVE THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT GIVES
ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN. STOP USING FORCE TO THINK AND THAT IS THE SECOND HIGHER
STATE OF MIND, STOP STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE AND DISLIKE AND THAT IS THE
THIRD HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND FINALLY STOP RECEIVING FORCE TO EXPERIENCE
NEITHER PAIN NOR PLEASURE AND YOU ACHIEVE THE 4TH HIGHEST STATE OF
MIND AND 500 ETERNITIES IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
Why you suffer and will die shortly:
The reason why all beings here suffer and will die
shortly is because they are constantly using force, constantly exposing
themselves to even violent forces from others that is the only cause of suffering
that degrades them and end in death that is never pleasant but tormenting.
Consciousness too is a product of force and there
is the realm beyond consciousness called nothingness that the Buddha said is
the highest in existence that gives the highest happiness and a lifespan of
60,000 eternities.
When you prolong syllables, change speed and
loudness you must use evil death causing force.
When you talk or do anything (eg the golf that you
are so crazy and proud about) you must use force that is suffering and causes
death.
When you think you are using force.
When you like and dislike or are experiencing
emotions (fear, anxiety, confusion, hurt) you are also using or stirring your
mental force.
When you experience pain or pleasure you are
exposing yourself to force.
ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE USING FORCE ALL THE TIME AND
THEY CANNOT SEE THEMSELVES USING FORCE. ONLY THOSE WHOSE CONCENTRATION IS HIGH
ARE SENSITIVE TO AND AWARE WHEN THEY ARE AND ARE NOT USING FORCE AND THEY KNOW
FORCE IS THE SOURCE OF MISERY AND DEATH.
OFTEN PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE THEY ARE USING EVEN VERY
SIGNIFICANT FORCE AND IT IS ONLY WHEN THEIR SUFFERING IS TOO SEVERE TO IGNORE
ARE THEY AWARE OF THE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS THAT THEY DO NOT KNOW ARE DUE TO
FORCE.
In order to have roles you must be a robot and so
if you speak of your job as a role you are admitting you are a robot, faking
it, acting it rather than truly being prime minister.
Anyone who is conscious of his roles, who thinks of
his job and life as roles (role of husband, father) is admitting he is a robot
because in order to play a role you must have a preconceived idea of what your
role is and act precisely or approximately according to that role and rather
than happiness it is tormenting, maddening to be a robot, however exalted the
role of PM or king you think it is.
Women in leadership:
There is nothing special about women in leadership;
it is about delusion and partisanship.
UNLESS YOU ARE DELUDED OR PARTISAN, SEX IS
COINCIDENTAL, NOT A FACTOR IN LEADERSHIP. THERE ARE LEADERS BUT EVEN LEADERSHIP
IS NOT A PROPER SUBJECT FOR STUDY NOR SHOULD ANYONE EXCEPT THE DELUDED ASPIRE
TO BE LEADERS, TO FIND GLORY AS LEADERS BECAUSE THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF A
LEADER ARE HEAVY FAR OUTWEIGH WHATEVER GLORY HE MAY DERIVE.
Only fools or the deluded aspire to be
leaders:
Those who possess true understanding do not need
anyone to lead them, they know the way out of danger and suffering and it is
only those without true understanding who are lost who require others to lead
them.
Men seek leadership to glorify themselves, make a
name for themselves, to use and abuse those who are their followers not realizing
that leadership comes with big responsibilities that if neglected they are
liable for much suffering in repayment.
THE WISE DO NOT SEEK TO LEAD OTHERS, THEY ARE AT
PEACE WITH THEMSELVES AND OTHERS AND DO NOT SEEK FAME AND RISK DEBT BY BEING
ENTANGLED AND IT IS ONLY FOOLS AND THE DELUDED WHO DO NOT KNOW THE RISKS TO
THEMSELVES, WHO SEEK TO EXPLOIT OTHERS THEY LEAD AND BASK IN SELF GLORY AND
MAKING A NAME FOR THEMSELVES WHO SEEK LEADERSHIP, EXALT LEADERSHIP.
This is a subject for idle curiosity which is never harmless, is useless and suffering and leads to even
eternal suffering rather than happiness.
There is no reason for anyone to know the history
of dogs nor is it certain what is touted is what actually happened. Those who
have true understanding will not trouble themselves to consider such topics
which encourage idle curiosity that is suffering and the path to future
suffering.
Evidence JFK assassination may be a
conspiracy:
This nurse happened to be in the emergency dept
when JFK was wheeled in and she helped proceedings by holding his head and she
saw an unusual different big bullet lodged in Kennedy’s head that disappeared
later.
“I could see a bullet lodged between
his ear and his shoulder. It was pointed at its tip and showed no signs of
damage. I remember looking at it – there was no blunting of the bullet or
scarring around the shell from where it had been fired.
“I’d had a great deal of experience
working with gunshot wounds but I had never seen anything like this before.
“It was about one-and-a-half inches
long – nothing like the bullets that were later produced.
“It was taken away but never have I
seen it presented in evidence or heard what happened to it. It remains a
mystery.”
Phyllis, now 78, refuses to go along
with the idea that Oswald acted alone to carry out the assassination.
“There are so many theories out there,
who knows what to believe any more?” she muses.
“I truly believe no man could have
carried out the attack without some sort of help, and after seeing the mystery
bullet in Mr Kennedy’s head I feel there is something far deeper to his death
than we the public know.”
JFK’s head wound suggests high powered
bullet:
From the description of the surgeon, there was a
big gaping skull wound with the skull and brain missing which suggests a high
powered bullet in keeping with the unusual big bullet the nurse saw that
disappeared and this suggests those involved had access to sophisticated guns
and bullets and aimed to kill.
Quote: ‘Much of the right side of
his brain had been destroyed as well, and the remainder was exposed by a gaping
hole in his skull.
Quote nurse: “His pupils were
dilated and there was a gaping exit wound in his throat.” (this again suggests
a powerful bullet that ripped through and likely to be the same bullet that
shattered JFK’s skull and brain and then penetrated through to rest on his shoulder.)
Fate that observant nurse was a witness?
The nurse who made the observations worked in
outpatients not emergency and she happened to be there visiting a friend
working there and she was ordered to enter theatre to assist and she held the
president’s head. She said she was experienced with gunshot wounds and bullets.
It may be an accident but it may be fate that she
should happen to be in casualty and caught up with proceedings.
Bush snr & CIA behind JFK
assassination:
There is a lot of detailed credible evidence with
many potential witnesses dying in unexplained circumstances to point the finger
at the CIA and Bush snr as the culprits behind JFK’s assassination in revenge
for the CIA Bay of Pigs invasion fiasco for which the then CIA director Dulles
was fired by JFK. The assassination was meticulously planned with many top
marksmen recruited to fire at different points, I think the motorcade was even
slowed down to give a better chance. Oswald knew those conspiring and he was
probably recruited to act as scapegoat which was why he was killed to silence
him.
The Democrats are no angels but the Republicans are
the party of the rich and the more likely and devious of the two parties to
resort to ruthless murderous means to achieve their agenda and control the
nation and Prescott Bush, George Bush’s father was a very wealthy man with
extensive intimate connections with government up to presidential level on the
Republican side and it was said Nixon was a Bush puppet. It seems he had
financial dealings with the Nazis and was banned, he and his sons were members
of a top secret, secret society called skull and bones and he made his fortune
in the oil business which still is important to the family.
George Bush has high level secret involvement with
CIA even in those JFK days that he denied and there is suggestion he was in
Dallas then and a picture that appeared to show him standing in front of the
Dallas book depository that was owned by a company linked to the Bushes,
perhaps ostensibly to map out arrangements and security in advance of the
president’s motorcade the next day.
And so it seems, the assassination in Dallas was
well planned in advance, involved multiple sharp shooters located at different
points, Oswald was purposely recruited and knew the others and the Book
depository was owned by a Bush linked company.
THE NURSE WHO HELD JFK’S HEAD DURING HIS
RESUSCITATION SAID SHE SAW A BIG REMARKABLE UNSCRATCHED BULLET LODGED IN JFK’S
SHOULDER THAT SUGGESTS IT IS A PROFESSIONAL HARDENED BULLET AND THE FACT THE
BULLET DISAPPEARED INDICATES THOSE INVOLVED HAD ACCESS TO THE EVIDENCE AND MUST
INCLUDE THE CIA AND FBI AND THEY WILL ONLY COVERUP FOR THEMSELVES NOT OTHERS
LIKE THE MAFIA.
BUSH WAS A TOP SECRET OPERATIVE FOR THE CIA THEN
AND WAS IN DALLAS DURING THE TIME AND HIS NAME WAS MENTIONED IN A FBI DOCUMENT
THAT HE DENIED REFERRED TO HIM AND HE DENIED HE WAS IN THE CIA WHEN HE WAS
NOMINATED FOR DIRECTOR OF CIA BY GERALD FORD. BUSH AS VICE PRESIDENT WAS
INVOLVED IN A LOT OF SHADY CIA DEEDS INCLUDING THE IRAN CONTRA AFFAIR.
I THINK BUSH’S SON WON THE CONTROVERSIAL ELECTION
AGAINST GORE BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE RULED IN HIS FAVOUR THAT SUGGESTS
THE CLOUT OF THE BUSH DYNASTY.
Did the Bushes help to kill
JFK?
If nothing else, these pages will show the reader the
following:
- Although he does not recall when asked, George (Herbert Walker) Bush was in Dallas the day JFK was assassinated.
- Bush lies about the fact that he was a high-ranking CIA official at the time of JFK's death.
- Bush allowed the escape of a convicted terrorist from prison to go to work for him as an undercover CIA asset in Iran-Contra.
- Bush has released another convicted terrorist.
- Both these terrorists were present on Dealey Plaza on 11/22/1963.
- Both these terrorists were convicted for killing 73 people by blowing up an airliner.
- Bush is personal friends with a close associate of these convicted terrorists, who was also a participant in Iran Contra.
- Bush has taken a leading role as CIA official in structuring/organizing these terrorists in effective organizations.
Shall we say: "Only in America, the land of unlimited opportunities"?
- Although he does not recall when asked, George (Herbert Walker) Bush was in Dallas the day JFK was assassinated.
- Bush lies about the fact that he was a high-ranking CIA official at the time of JFK's death.
- Bush allowed the escape of a convicted terrorist from prison to go to work for him as an undercover CIA asset in Iran-Contra.
- Bush has released another convicted terrorist.
- Both these terrorists were present on Dealey Plaza on 11/22/1963.
- Both these terrorists were convicted for killing 73 people by blowing up an airliner.
- Bush is personal friends with a close associate of these convicted terrorists, who was also a participant in Iran Contra.
- Bush has taken a leading role as CIA official in structuring/organizing these terrorists in effective organizations.
Shall we say: "Only in America, the land of unlimited opportunities"?
================================================
+ All three generations Bush are members of a most
powerful and most secret society. It's called The order of Skull and Bones.
Those who want to learn more about Skull and Bones can do so by clicking here. Or read this book click here.
Three generations
And those who argue that Skull and Bones is just a
harmless fraternity or boy scout's club, may ask themselves whether it is okay
for leaders of open and democratic societies, to be members of secret
organizations whose agendas are not to be disclosed to the public.
"My senior year, I
joined Skull & Bones, a secret
society, so secret, I can't say anything more."
George W. Bush, President of the United States
society, so secret, I can't say anything more."
George W. Bush, President of the United States
See George W. Bush admitting his membership of Skull
and Bones by
clicking here
The unauthorized biography of George H.W. Bush can be
read here
Some more of many links on Bush connections to the JFK
assassination:
http://www.ciajfk.com/home4.html
http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/coverups/bronfmanbush.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ky/ohwhy/Bush.html
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
http://www.lizmichael.com/bushykno.htm
http://forums.alternet.org/guest/motet?show+-ugYR2t+-chjz+Currents+908+1
http://www.jrryan.cc/poetry/what_know.htm
http://www.sumeria.net/politics/kennedy.html
http://www.ciajfk.com/home4.html
http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/coverups/bronfmanbush.html
http://www.angelfire.com/ky/ohwhy/Bush.html
http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html
http://www.lizmichael.com/bushykno.htm
http://forums.alternet.org/guest/motet?show+-ugYR2t+-chjz+Currents+908+1
http://www.jrryan.cc/poetry/what_know.htm
http://www.sumeria.net/politics/kennedy.html
Where were you, George?
+ Prescott Bush (father of George) made his fortune by
financing the war effort of Adolph Hitler together with his banking partners
and fellow "bonesmen" Averell and Roland Harriman. Prescott was
stripped of his holdings in the Union Banking Corporation in 1942 under the
"Trading with the Enemy Act".
"On March 19, 1934, Prescott Bush handed Averell
Harriman a copy of that day's New York Times. The Polish government was
applying to take over Consolidated Silesian Steel Corporation and Upper
Silesian Coal and Steel Company from "German and American interests"
because of rampant "mismanagement, excessive borrowing, fictitious
bookkeeping and gambling in securities." The Polish government required
the owners of the company, which accounted for over 45% of Poland's steel
production, to pay at least its full share of back taxes. Bush and Harriman
would eventually hire attorney John Foster Dulles
to help cover up any improprieties that might arise under investigative
scrutiny." Source: "Heir to the Holocaust" by Toby Rogers: http://www.clamormagazine.org/issues/14/feature3.shtml
John Foster Dulles was the brother of Allen Dulles,
the later CIA director, who was the architect - together with Vice President
Richard Nixon and George Bush - of the Bay of Pigs invasion to overthrow Fidel
Castro's Cuba. Allen Dulles was fired by President Kennedy because of the
fiasco of the Bay of Pigs. Yet Allen Dulles was appointed by Lyndon Johnson to
serve on the Warren Commission to "investigate" JFK's death.
+ A vice-president of Empire Trust in Dallas was Jack Crichton (also president of Nafco Oil & Gas,
Inc.) who was connected with Army Reserve Intelligence. In a 1995 book written
by Fabian Escalante, the chief of a Cuban counterintelligence unit during the
late 1950s and early 1960s, he describes that as soon as intelligence was
received from agents in Cuba that Fidel Castro had "converted to
communism," a plan called "Operation 40"
was put into effect by the National Security Council, presided over by
Vice-President Richard Nixon. Escalante indicates that Nixon
was the Cuban "case officer" who had assembled an important group of
businessmen headed by George Bush and Jack Crichton,
both Texas oilmen, to gather the necessary funds for the operation. Source: http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/coverups/bronfmanbush.html
In Dick Russell's book, The Man Who Knew Too Much (New
York: Carroll & Graf Publishers/Richard Gallen, 1992), at pp. 614-615,
under a section called "Origins of the Cover-up" there is a
description of a group of Dallas men who surrounded Marina Oswald as soon as
her husband had been arrested, but before he was killed by Jack Ruby. These
were intelligence operatives seeking out Russian speakers. Ilya Mamantov knew
George Bush and spoke Russian. A geologist with Sun Oil, he received a call
five hours after the assassination from Jack Crichton,
who was at that time the president of Nafco Oil and Gas, Inc. and a former
Military Intelligence officer then attached to Army Reserve Intelligence.
Crichton was also director of Dorchester Gas Producing Co. with D.H. Byrd, who
owned the Texas School Book Depository building and was a close friend of
Lyndon Johnson. Source: http://www.newsmakingnews.com/lm4,4,02,harvardtoenronpt2.htm
+ In 1968, six months after the assassination of
Robert Kennedy, Prescott writes this letter (click here)
to Clover Dulles, wife of Allen Dulles. Note that he blames the Kennedy's for
the failure of the Bay of Pigs.
+ In the 1950's Prescott and the Harrimans are the
founding fathers of CBS. In 1963, CBS reporter Dan Rather makes his career
break with the Kennedy Assassination by lying to the American public that he
sees JFK's head move violently FORWARD on the Zapruder film. To hear Dan Rather
lying click here.
The lie is possible, because the Zapruder film was bought by Time Life and kept lock and barrel from the public for 14 years. Time Life is founded and owned by Henry Luce, also a member of Skull and Bones. Luce had many friends, among them general Edward Lansdale, a known covert operative for the CIA. Henry's wife, Clare Booth Luce, Congresswoman, is a radical supporter of the Anti-Castro movement and personal friends with another high-ranking covert operative for the CIA and a resident from Fort Worth: David Atlee Phillips. Edward Lansdale and David Phillips are widely accepted as key planners of the JFK assassination. They are also exact matches for the "covert operations specialist"(Phillips) and the "top brass in military intelligence from Asia" (Lansdale) as described in Sam Giancana's biography "Double Cross" (to read the page click here).
The lie is possible, because the Zapruder film was bought by Time Life and kept lock and barrel from the public for 14 years. Time Life is founded and owned by Henry Luce, also a member of Skull and Bones. Luce had many friends, among them general Edward Lansdale, a known covert operative for the CIA. Henry's wife, Clare Booth Luce, Congresswoman, is a radical supporter of the Anti-Castro movement and personal friends with another high-ranking covert operative for the CIA and a resident from Fort Worth: David Atlee Phillips. Edward Lansdale and David Phillips are widely accepted as key planners of the JFK assassination. They are also exact matches for the "covert operations specialist"(Phillips) and the "top brass in military intelligence from Asia" (Lansdale) as described in Sam Giancana's biography "Double Cross" (to read the page click here).
David Atlee Phillips and Edward
Lansdale
+ David Atlee Phillips was the mastermind for the CIA
staged coup by Pinochet in 1973, as well as the overthrow in 1954 of the
Guatemala regime headed by Jacobo Arbenz. He is working closely with CIA
officer E. Howard Hunt, another suspect in the plot to kill JFK and the leader
of the infamous Watergate burglar team. In the 1950's and 1960's, Phillips is
the CIA case officer for the anti Castro Cubans in Havana and Mexico City. He
is also the CIA controller for Lee Harvey Oswald and James Files. James Files
has confessed that he fired the shot into JFK's head from behind the picket
fence on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza. This story is completely ignored by
the mainstream media, which seems strange, because even if he were lying, one
would expect some exposure. The star of David Atlee Phillips rises to CIA
director of Covert Operations for the Western Hemisphere. According to his
nephew Shawn Phillips, who is quite a famous musician, David Atlee Phillips
confirmed to his brother James Atlee Phillips that he was in Dallas the day
Kennedy died. To read Shawn's email: click here.
+ Prescott Bush advised Eisenhower to run for
President and then launched Richard Nixon into the Vice Presidency.
Subsequently he was a major financer of Nixon's presidential campaign against
Kennedy. Prescott Bush was an avid JFK opponent and Nixon has always been a
puppet for the interests of the Bush family. To read the details click here.
Prescott Bush with President Dwight
Eisenhower
Prescott with his protégé Dick Nixon
Prescott and Ike
+ George Herbert Walker Bush is one of the very few
Americans who does not recall where he was when JFK was killed. Yet, the
following document, recently declassified, places him very close to Dallas
within 2 hours of JFK's assassination:
But who says the Bush telephone call really came from
Tyler, Texas? To his own admission, this document places Bush IN Dallas for the
remainder of the day and night of November 22, 1963. He is implicating a
political activist (James Parrott) in the process. Why did Bush want to keep
his telephone call confidential? And why does he not remember it? Why did he
give his warning AFTER the assassination, if he thought Parrott was a serious
threat for Kennedy in Houston? Kennedy had just visited Houston the day before
! And why are the sources of this hearsay information unknown? Who told him
this, if anyone? Or is this just a document to furnish Bush with an alibi and
plausible denial? Thirty years later the same James Parrott that Bush was accusing
is working on Bush's presidential campaign against Bill Clinton.
"Figure that one out; if someone had tried to finger me for killing President Kennedy, that person would have been my worst enemy. See volume one and ten for damning evidence. The FBI agent that took Bush's call was Graham Kitchel, whose brother George Kitchel knew both de Mohrenschildt (Oswald's best friend in Dallas) and Bush. (NOTE: Graham was a favourite of FBI Director, J. E. Hoover who was briefing Bush of the CIA on November 23, 1963). On October 13, 1999, Adamson called Kenneth B. Jackson the FBI agent who investigated Parrott and received Bush's complaint. Mr. Jackson, refused to return Adamson's phone call. why? "
Source: Bruce Adamson http://www.ciajfk.com/home4.html
"Figure that one out; if someone had tried to finger me for killing President Kennedy, that person would have been my worst enemy. See volume one and ten for damning evidence. The FBI agent that took Bush's call was Graham Kitchel, whose brother George Kitchel knew both de Mohrenschildt (Oswald's best friend in Dallas) and Bush. (NOTE: Graham was a favourite of FBI Director, J. E. Hoover who was briefing Bush of the CIA on November 23, 1963). On October 13, 1999, Adamson called Kenneth B. Jackson the FBI agent who investigated Parrott and received Bush's complaint. Mr. Jackson, refused to return Adamson's phone call. why? "
Source: Bruce Adamson http://www.ciajfk.com/home4.html
THE CONFESSED ASSASSIN
OF JOHN F. KENNEDY
OF JOHN F. KENNEDY
View a fragment of the video confession, preceded by
comments of Jim Garrison : Click
here
NOTICE: This document is the sole and exclusive copyrighted
property of JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM and may not be copied, reproduced or duplicated
in any form without written permission.
© 2003 JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM All Rights Reserved
© 2003 JFKMURDERSOLVED.COM All Rights Reserved
ABOUT THIS TRANSCRIPT
On March 22, 1994, television producer Robert G.
Vernon videotaped the confession of James E. Files during which Mr. Files
confessed that he fired the fatal last shot into the right front temple of John
F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963 in Dealey Plaza, Dallas Texas. A transcript of
Mr. Files's confession follows. Included in the transcript is documentation and
research (in italic font) based on existing evidence uncovered by
leading JFK assassination researchers and authors. The purpose of this writing
is to compare the confession of James E. Files to a majority of the evidence
that has been uncovered in the last 34 years relative to the assassination.
Readers are invited to review the following and to judge the veracity of Mr.
Files's confession for themselves.
A NOTE ABOUT REFERENCES
References in the text are numerically keyed to the
bibliography. Each reference is assigned a number and is listed by that number
in the bibliography. When a reference is cited in the text, the references's
bibliographic number is given. Page numbers, if any, appear after the reference
number. If the entire reference is being cited, then only its number is given.
For example, Mark Lane's book Rush to Judgment is listed as reference number 4
in the bibliography. If the entire book is being cited, the citation will look
like this: (4). If pages 221-224 are cited from the book, the citation will
appear as follows: (4:221-224). The only exceptions to this method are when
information is cited or quoted from the Warren Commission's report and from the
appendices to the report of the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
Citations from the Warren Commission's report will be given as WCR, followed by
the page number(s). Thus, WCR 32 refers to page 32 of the WCR. For the HSCA
volumes, the volume number will be given, followed by the abbreviation HSCA and
the page number(s). Thus, for example, 6 HSCA 110-111 refers to pages 110-111
of volume 6 of the appendices to the Select Committee's report.
TRANSCRIPTION
VIDEO TAPED CONFESSION OF JAMES E.
FILES
March 22, 1994
Present: James Earl Files - Inmate, Robert G. Vernon -
Producer, Bob Baxter - Cameraman, Mike Krolikiewicz - Prison Clinical Services
Location: Stateville Correctional Center, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois
Time: 10:30 AM CST
Location: Stateville Correctional Center, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, Illinois
Time: 10:30 AM CST
Q: Please tell me your name.
A: My name is James Files and I changed my name basically at the end of 1963 for purposes of ...let me rephrase that. I took the name Files in 1963, my real name is James Sutton.
Q: Say that again.
A: My real name is James Sutton but I changed my name in late 1963 due to the fact that at that time I wished to get married and raise a family.
Q: And what is your name now?
A: Today, I'm incarcerated and I'm under the name James E. Files. I raised a family under that name, James Files.
Q: Did you change your name for any particular reason or anything involved in your past?
A: I changed my name for a particular reason because I had been working with a radical Cuban group and what we wanted to do at that time was to protect my identity so they wouldn't know who I really was when I got married because of my family life. I didn't want anyone to retaliate on the things that we were doing so I took on a different name that was authorized to me through a government agency.
Q: Were you ever in the armed services?
A: I was in the 82nd Airborne. I went in '59...1959, date of entry...January and in July 10 of 1959, I believe it was July 10, we shipped out to Laos. I was 82nd Airborne.(1)
Q: What were some of your duties?
A: My name is James Files and I changed my name basically at the end of 1963 for purposes of ...let me rephrase that. I took the name Files in 1963, my real name is James Sutton.
Q: Say that again.
A: My real name is James Sutton but I changed my name in late 1963 due to the fact that at that time I wished to get married and raise a family.
Q: And what is your name now?
A: Today, I'm incarcerated and I'm under the name James E. Files. I raised a family under that name, James Files.
Q: Did you change your name for any particular reason or anything involved in your past?
A: I changed my name for a particular reason because I had been working with a radical Cuban group and what we wanted to do at that time was to protect my identity so they wouldn't know who I really was when I got married because of my family life. I didn't want anyone to retaliate on the things that we were doing so I took on a different name that was authorized to me through a government agency.
Q: Were you ever in the armed services?
A: I was in the 82nd Airborne. I went in '59...1959, date of entry...January and in July 10 of 1959, I believe it was July 10, we shipped out to Laos. I was 82nd Airborne.(1)
Q: What were some of your duties?
A: My duties at that time...we were working a special
operations group to work with the Laotian Army in Laos at that time. I was
there strictly as an advisor..on training...with small automatic
weapons...setting detonators, explosives, mechanical ambushes. There was just a
handful of Americans working with the Laotians at that time.
Q: How long did you serve there?
Q: How long did you serve there?
A: I was there through...approximately 14 months I was
in Laos..before I came home.
Q: You mentioned to me at one time that you were in
jeopardy of being court martialed could you elaborate on that a little bit?
A: I really don't wish to elaborate on that part of
the court martial. It had to do in the field but not of cowardice, it was
something that I did to hold face with the Laotian Army.
Q: Could you tell me how you first became involved in
organized crime activities?
A: Well, I first became...it''s a strange way to start
out...but I was racing stock cars and driving at a local track and Mr.
Nicoletti had taken a shine to my driving and he'd watched me on several
occasionsand he had asked me once if I would drive him one evening. I took him
out and test drove his car that we'd just picked up..a brand new Ford...and he
was pretty well pleased with my driving and from then on I became more like an
assigned driver to him and I did several drivings for him on different jobs
that he did.
Q: Who was Charles Nicoletti?
Q: Who was Charles Nicoletti?
A: Charles Nicoletti, at that time, he was an up and
coming figure with organized crime and he was known as one of the local hitman.
As far as I'm concerned he was the best that ever lived, as far as I'm
concerned.(2)
Q: What Mafia family did he work for?
A: He was out of the Chicago family.
Q: What Mafia family did he work for?
A: He was out of the Chicago family.
Q: Who would have been the boss of the Chicago family?
A: At that time, Tony Accardo.
A: At that time, Tony Accardo.
Q: That's before Giancana or after Giancana?
A: Tony Accardo handed it up...headed it up....then
Giancana came after that. Giancana at that time was one of the underlings, I
guess you might say he was the...one of the top lieutenants at that point.
Things were handed out in different branches in organized crime such as someone
might handle the liquor license, someone would handle the loan sharking and
booking, someone would handle the contracts for murder for hire and anything
like that.(3)
Q: James, where were you on November 22, 1963?
A: On November 22, 1963, I was in Dealey Plaza. I arrived at Dealey Plaza shortly before 10 AM that morning.
A: On November 22, 1963, I was in Dealey Plaza. I arrived at Dealey Plaza shortly before 10 AM that morning.
Q: What was your reason for being there?
A: My reason for being there at that point was to look
the area over. I had driven a vehicle down there and I had taken several
weapons to Dallas, Texas.
Q: For what purpose did you do this?
A: I did this for the sole purpose for the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Q: Who instructed you to do this, James? Tell me the story...in your words...
Q: For what purpose did you do this?
A: I did this for the sole purpose for the assassination of John F. Kennedy.
Q: Who instructed you to do this, James? Tell me the story...in your words...
A: The story started back....oh, roughly six months
prior to that when Mr. Nicoletti contacted me one evening and I had met with
him and he instructed me that we was going to do a friend of mine. It was more
like a personal joke because I had never liked John F. Kennedy since the
Chianos Bay affair which was the Bay of Pigs.
Q: Were you at the Bay of Pigs, Jimmy?
A: No, I was not at the Bay of Pigs but I had helped train several of the operatives that were involved at the Bay of Pigs.
Q: Were you at the Bay of Pigs, Jimmy?
A: No, I was not at the Bay of Pigs but I had helped train several of the operatives that were involved at the Bay of Pigs.
Q: When you say "helped train them" what do
you mean?
A: I helped train them on what they call..we called it
"Gator Ridge" back then, some people refer to it as "No Name
Key" some people call it "Assassin Ridge" it was in the
Everglades down there in Florida.(5) We
worked solely with the Cubans at that time...we had supplied them with
weapons...the weapons had come basically from the government...from the
CIA...they had been heavily involved in that. And at that time, David Atlee
Phillips was my controller. So I had never liked Kennedy since he had backed
out on us and we didn't get enough firepower and I felt that we had been
betrayed.(6)
But, I, at that point, I had never even considered killing anybody at all over
the situation, but when Charles Nicoletti told me that we were going to do my
friend, I thought that they were referring to a local party in town and I said
why what the hell did he do. He laughed, he says no not him, we're going to do
John F. Kennedy, the president. I was a little bit shocked at first but I said
hey fine, great, don't matter to me. I was game for anything he wanted to do.
And then we discussed it and then he asked me what I thought about Johnny
Rosselli(9)
working with us and I told him hey fine I like Johnny..got no problems there.
Q: So you knew John Rosselli before that day?
A: I knew John Rosselli before that day.
Q: So you knew John Rosselli before that day?
A: I knew John Rosselli before that day.
Q: How did you meet him?
A: I had met John Rosselli in Miami and discussed a few things with him and he...I had met him through David Atlee Phillips...David Atlee Phillips was an operative for the CIA. Through time everybody got to be fairly well good friends but I grew up basically under Chuck's wing...Mr. Nicoletti's wing. Chuck had told me we were going to do it. We'd first originally planned to do the assassination in Chicago but a lot of people didn't like that idea so then it was moved to another location.
Q: When you say "we planned it" could you clarify "we"?
A: I had met John Rosselli in Miami and discussed a few things with him and he...I had met him through David Atlee Phillips...David Atlee Phillips was an operative for the CIA. Through time everybody got to be fairly well good friends but I grew up basically under Chuck's wing...Mr. Nicoletti's wing. Chuck had told me we were going to do it. We'd first originally planned to do the assassination in Chicago but a lot of people didn't like that idea so then it was moved to another location.
Q: When you say "we planned it" could you clarify "we"?
A: Well when I say we...I was just with Mr. Nicoletti.
Whatever he said do, I would do. When I say we, I'm referring like...the only
thing I did was just drive the car or whatever that they needed me for. Mr.
Nicoletti had asked me then at that point when we'd decided not to do it in
Chicago and it was going to be moved to Dallas...when John F. Kennedy had
decided to go to Dallas...a week in advance, I took the '63 Chevrolet that we
had at that time..I left and I went down a week earlier. I picked up the
weapons from the storage bin that we had and loaded them in the car with
everything that I thought we might need..with a various assortment...and I left
and I drove to Dallas. I stayed out at a place in Mesquite, Texas.(11)
Once I got there, I called back and notified Mr. Nicoletti that I was thee and
on the scene. The following day, Lee Harvey Oswald came by the motel where I
was at...they had given him my location...and he took me out to a place
somewhere southeast of Mesquite where I test fired the weapons and calibrated
the scopes on anything that might be needed. Then he was with me for a few days
in town there...we drove around...so I would know all the streets and not run
into any dead ends streets if anything went wrong and we had to flee from the
area.
Q: So Lee Oswald spent time with you...he knew why you were there, you knew why he was there...?
Q: So Lee Oswald spent time with you...he knew why you were there, you knew why he was there...?
A: Lee Harvey Oswald knew that I was there but I never
told him why I was there. He had just been come over and told to stay with me
and to help me out and to assist in any way he could. Lee Harvey Oswald and I
never discussed the assassination of John F. Kennedy. I discussed that with no
one. Because my part of it...I had no part of the assassination at that
time...all I did was go down, take the car down, take the weapons down, clean
the weapons, calibrate the scopes, make sure everything was functioning
properly and then know the immediate area surrounding Dealey Plaza back to the
expressways and the other local highways that could be used as an extraction
point to leave Dallas in case something should go wrong. At that point, I had
no involvement at all in the assassination outside of that...just doing my
little job that I had to do.
Q: Could you give me the exact chronology of what happened from the time you arrived in Dallas...? You've already said that you went out and test fired some guns and things...take me back to maybe November 21, the day before, and in your own words, tell me what happened from November 21, 1963 until the night of November 22, 1963...
Q: Could you give me the exact chronology of what happened from the time you arrived in Dallas...? You've already said that you went out and test fired some guns and things...take me back to maybe November 21, the day before, and in your own words, tell me what happened from November 21, 1963 until the night of November 22, 1963...
The Headshots
Note that JFK's head moves forward first. This
movement is not visible at normal speed with the naked eye. It is with the speed
of a bullet, just a fraction of a second from the impact of a bullet that hits
JFK in the back of the head. Then the head moves violently back and to the left
from the impact of another bullet from the front in the right temple.
From the confession of James Files 1994: "When I
got to the point where I thought it would be the last field of fire, I had
zeroed in to the left side of the head there that I had because if I wait any
longer then Jacqueline Kennedy would have been in the line of fire and I had
been instructed for nothing to happen to her and at that moment I figured this
is my last chance for a shot and he had still not been hit in the head. So, as
I fired that round, Mr. Nicoletti and I fired approximately at the same time as
the head started forward then it went backward. I would
have to say that his shell struck approximately 1000th of a second ahead of
mine maybe but that what's started pushing the head forward which caused me to
miss from the left eye and I came in on the left side of the temple."
From the confession of James Files 2003:
J - where were you aiming?
JF - Oh, I was aiming for his right eye, which to me is the left side of his head looking head on. But for him it would be his right eye, and when I pulled the trigger, and I'm right in on it, and it's almost like looking 6 feet away through the scope. As I squeezed, take off my round, his head moved forward, I missed and I come in right along the temple. Just right behind the eye.
J - Here or in the hairline?
JF - Well, I'm not sure, you know I can't see the penetration, I know I hit him right here (pointing at temple). I know I hit behind the eye. Somewhere within a half inch diameter right there (pointing again).
W - So there were actually two shots almost simultaneously?
J - You think he got hit as you squeezed?
JF - What I believe is this : ….. And I got my readings as a marksman, I'm a good shooter, always was, I'm not bragging on my stuff, don't get me wrong, but that's what got me my start with David Phillips. Because of something that I did in the service, and I made a mark there and it's on record and it's recorded, for headshots, for what I did, and the things that I did. But anyway, to make a long story short, as I am preparing to squeeze off my round, Kennedy's head moved forward, just as I squeezed. It was already in process, the head started forward. To me … what I believe is, … and I did not see, let me clear the fact now, I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the Daltex building, the man supposed to be doing the shooting. Therefore the head started forward and as far as I am concerned Mr Nicoletti hit him at that point. As I squeezed off my round, the head started forward, I hit it and blew the head backwards.
From the confession of James Files 2003:
J - where were you aiming?
JF - Oh, I was aiming for his right eye, which to me is the left side of his head looking head on. But for him it would be his right eye, and when I pulled the trigger, and I'm right in on it, and it's almost like looking 6 feet away through the scope. As I squeezed, take off my round, his head moved forward, I missed and I come in right along the temple. Just right behind the eye.
J - Here or in the hairline?
JF - Well, I'm not sure, you know I can't see the penetration, I know I hit him right here (pointing at temple). I know I hit behind the eye. Somewhere within a half inch diameter right there (pointing again).
W - So there were actually two shots almost simultaneously?
J - You think he got hit as you squeezed?
JF - What I believe is this : ….. And I got my readings as a marksman, I'm a good shooter, always was, I'm not bragging on my stuff, don't get me wrong, but that's what got me my start with David Phillips. Because of something that I did in the service, and I made a mark there and it's on record and it's recorded, for headshots, for what I did, and the things that I did. But anyway, to make a long story short, as I am preparing to squeeze off my round, Kennedy's head moved forward, just as I squeezed. It was already in process, the head started forward. To me … what I believe is, … and I did not see, let me clear the fact now, I never saw Mr. Nicoletti shoot Kennedy, but I know he was the man in the Daltex building, the man supposed to be doing the shooting. Therefore the head started forward and as far as I am concerned Mr Nicoletti hit him at that point. As I squeezed off my round, the head started forward, I hit it and blew the head backwards.
Former warden of Joliet prison Tony
Godinez comments on James Files.
Former warden Tony Godinez of Staville prison, Illinois, where James Files is incarcerated for attempted murder of a police officer. Godinez has interviewed James Files more than anyone else. He has found his story about JFK meticulously detailed and consistent over the years, and he has never been able to catch Files in a lie or fabrication, no matter how hard he tried. He tells that James Files never bragged about the JFK assassination, and that the only emotion that Files displayed about it, was frustration that he missed his target by a few inches as he was aiming for Kennedy's right eye. Godinez states that Files was well respected in prison, that he had no fear for other inmates, most of whom are black, but that he requested to be in protective custody. Asked for the reason, Files explained he felt safer that way from retaliation by a government agency.
JFK's Press Secretary Malcolm
Kilduff indicating on 11/22/1963 how the fatal shot was inflicted.
Dennis David, who saw JFK's wounds
on autopsy photos, indicates where he saw an entry wound.
James Files, confessed assassin of
JFK, indicates where he hit JFK.
Houston Chronicle coverage,
Published Nov. 22, 1963:
Dr. Kemp Clark, neurosurgeon, said:
"I was called because the President had sustained a brain injury."
"It was apparent the President had sustained a lethal wound," Dr. Clark said.
"A missile had gone in and out of the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue. Shortly after I arrived, the President's heart stopped. We attempted resuscitation, initiating closed chest heart massage, but to no avail.
"We were able to obtain a palpable pulse by this method but again to no avail.
President Kennedy died on the emergency table after 20 minutes.
Published Nov. 22, 1963:
Dr. Kemp Clark, neurosurgeon, said:
"I was called because the President had sustained a brain injury."
"It was apparent the President had sustained a lethal wound," Dr. Clark said.
"A missile had gone in and out of the back of his head, causing extensive lacerations and loss of brain tissue. Shortly after I arrived, the President's heart stopped. We attempted resuscitation, initiating closed chest heart massage, but to no avail.
"We were able to obtain a palpable pulse by this method but again to no avail.
President Kennedy died on the emergency table after 20 minutes.
To view more accounts of witnesses who saw the
location of the headwound Click
here.
The debris exiting from the back of JFK's head is
traveling too fast to be captured in the 18 frame per second Zapruder film. But
in a frame of the Nix film you can clearly see how the back of his his head is
blown out.
Malaysia has UMNO, US has Republicans:
Malaysia has UMNO that has carved up Malaysia and
the US has the rich republicans that have tentacles that control America more
than you think. Many of the Treasury secretaries come from Goldman Sachs which
may dictate government policies and actions more than you realize, many people
in high places are affiliated with either parties which are at each other’s
throats and they will act illegally to even commit murder and cover up. Even
Supreme court judges are political appointees and affiliated to either side.
YOU THINK YOU ARE CITIZEN OF THE COUNTRY BUT YOU
ARE A PROSTITUTE AND THE POLITICIANS ARE BIG TIME PIMPS AND HUSTLERS WHO CAN
RUTHLESSLY GET RID OF YOU IF IT SERVES THEM.
The vast majority of humanity are hard
core criminals and cut throats:
For one who sees correctly as it actually is the
vast majority of humanity are like the Bushes, totally self serving, ruthless,
cut throats behind a façade of affability and wholesomeness, totally
unrepentant and see no wrong but right or justification in their actions which
is why they are still here after having shed their own blood the Buddha said is
as vast as an ocean and it is hard to find someone who was not a relation in
the past.
That it will dent tourism is a false reason for
security and it shows this world are cynical, self serving or calculating, they
do things for true reasons but for show, for self serving or calculating
reasons.
YOU THINK IT IS OK BUT IT IS TRAINING YOURSELF AND
OTHERS IN WRONG REASONS FOR ACTIONS, WHEN SOMETHING HAPPENS, YOU THINK ABOUT
THE WRONG NOT RIGHT THINGS, THAT IT WILL DAMAGE THE TOURISM INDUSTRY.
All they think about is material
fallouts:
Something happens and the first thing money minded
people think about is the material fallouts, what are the opportunities for
gain and loss and so they jump to the conclusion the kidnap will dent the
tourism industry and they rush to sell their tourism shares.
IT IS A PROGRAMMING AND THEY ARE ROBOTS WHO HAVE
PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES TO THINK ABOUT MATERIAL FALLOUTS WHENEVER THINGS HAPPEN.
SOMEONE HAS BEEN KILLED AND ALL THEY THINK ABOUT IS
DENT IN TOURISM INDUSTRY.
The significance of the nurse’s
testimony:
It seems fortune or fate that the nurse who appears
a credible independent witness happened to be at the emergency department that day and she
should be ordered by JFK’s bodyguards to enter the emergency room to help
resuscitate the president and she happened to hold his head. She said she was
experienced with gunshot wounds and knew what she was seeing and the bullet she
saw lodged in the president’s shoulder was bigger than normal, pristine
suggesting it was a special armoured bullet.
If her evidence was reliable (and it was stated
unemotionally, ungarnished by hype) it means those involved in the cover up must
have access to the evidence, must go to the top and this means the CIA and FBI
are involved and normally you would not cover up others’ misdeeds, you cover up
your own misdeeds. And there is evidence that Bush lied about his involvement
in CIA and presence that day in Dallas.
Actually it is farfetched that Oswald alone
shooting from the window far away with a crude gun could fire 4-5 shots in
rapid succession that not just killed the president but blew a big part of his
skull and brain away. You need a high powered bullet and the coordinated
targeting of professional unemotional cold blooded assassins to pull it off
with any certainty.
IF OSWALD DID IT ALONE, IT MUST BE FREAKISH HE
SUCCEEDED. IF THE ROUTE AND EVERYTHING WAS PLANNED CAREFULLY BEFOREHAND BY THE
CIA IN CHARGE OF JFK’S SECURITY AND THERE WAS A TEAM OF EXPERT MARKSMEN LINED
UP THEN SUCCESS IS ALMOST ASSURED.
Why was Bush anxious to distance himself
from Dallas and CIA?
Just because Bush was in Dallas does not mean he
was involved with the killing and even if he wasn’t there does not mean he was
not involved.
Why would Bush be so cagey about his (secret)
connections with CIA, when he was nominated to be CIA director much later by
Gerald Ford he denied past links with CIA.
These denials are never based on reason but based
on stirred emotion, of guilty conscience, he knew he is linked to the plot and
is desperately irrationally trying to hide and deny that link that only serves
to affirm he has something serious to hide.
There was a picture with someone that looked like
Bush standing at the front of the Dallas book depository together with security
personnel and police apparently inspecting the place for the president’s route
the next day. Bush’s name was mentioned in official statements that indicate
his presence in CIA and Dallas yet he was anxious to deny any link.
JUST BECAUSE BUSH WAS IN DALLAS DOES NOT MEAN HE
KILLED THE PRESIDENT SO WHY IS BUSH SO ANXIOUS TO DISTANCE HIMSELF FROM DALLAS?
WHY IS BUSH SECRETIVE ABOUT HIS HIGH LEVEL
INVOLVEMENT IN CIA AT THE TIME OF JFK’S ASSASSINATION? JUST BECAUSE HE IS
INVOLVED DOES NOT MEAN HE KILLED JFK, BUT IF THE CIA WAS INVOLVED IN THE
KILLING THEN SINCE HE IS NOT LINKED TO CIA HE CANNOT BE IMPLICATED.
WHAT IS THE ALLURE OF THE CIA TO PEOPLE LIKE BUSH?
THE CIA IS PRIVY TO SECRET INFORMATION OBTAINED BY SPYING AND THESE MAY HAVE
ECONOMIC VALUE LIKE INSIDER INFORMATION THAT AVARICIOUS PEOPLE LIKE BUSH MAY
EXPLOIT TO MAKE EVEN CONSIDERABLE MONEY FOR THEMSELVES.
IT MAY NOT BE COINCIDENTAL BUSH WAS NOMINATED TO BE
CIA CHIEF BUT BECAUSE OF HIS PAST LINKS AND ATTACHMENT TO CIA THAT HE WAS
SELECTED TO BE ITS DIRECTOR.
THE BUSH CLAN IS SAID TO BE MEMBERS OF THE SECRET
SOCIETY SKULLS AND BONES THAT APPARENTLY INCLUDE MANY WEALTHY PEOPLE LIKE LIFE
MAGAZINE FOUNDER LUCE AND THE PURPOSE OF THIS SOCIETY MAY BE TO HELP EACH OTHER
PLUNDER WEALTH FROM AMERICA AND PROTECT THEIR VESTED INTERESTS.
Possible reasons why Bush may want JFK
dead:
Often the reasons for murder are petty, grudge,
revenge, envy and jealousy.
The Kennedys have a lot of blood on their hands,
they made their fortune on the stock exchange during the roaring twenties and
were shrewd to sell out just before the market crashed and they wielded
considerable political and mercantile influence. There were rival rich New
England families amongst them could have been the Bushes, the Dulles. The
Dulles may be aligned with the Bushes and one of the Dulles was secretary of
state.
The rich clans like the Bushes have powerful
connections in the government and even underworld, people who will do their
biddings, commit crimes on their behalf that enable them to escape
responsibility.
And so it may have been that business or political
rivalry, perceived slights and wrongdoing against them may nurture even intense
desires for revenge (perhaps the Bushes are strongly linked to CIA which is
their fiefdom and Dulles who was dismissed was aligned to them and so there was
much anger to get even).
When evil powerful men come together, they don’t
talk about noble things but to vent their animosity at mutual targets of hate
and plot and scheme and so it may be that the killing of the president was
broached and they began to think how they might do it using their considerable
political and underworld connections to do it and get away with it.
CIA operatives may be emboldened by
previous successes:
There is evidence the CIA was involved in murderous
plots around the world eg overthrow of Chile’s Allende, the disastrous Bay of
Pigs invasion, those murderous successful operations both within and outside
the US is unknown to the public but known to those in the CIA and it may be
these successes that embolden them to think they can get away with anything.
THE CIA MAY BE INVOLVED COVERTLY IN MANY SUCCESSFUL
SECRET MURDEROUS PLOTS AND THESE SUCCESSES MAY EMBOLDEN THOSE IN THE CIA TO
THINK THEY ARE INVINCIBLE AND CAN EVEN KILL THE PRESIDENT AND GET AWAY WITH
EXPOSURE (AND IT APPEARS THEY HAVE SUCCEEDED LARGELY).
Bush was a one term president:
Even Obama was re-elected, together with Carter,
Bush was a one term president and he was perceived as a ‘whimp’ or weakling or
nerd. He was elected on the coat tails of Reagan and defeated a fellow small
fry, Dukakis.
If the allegation was malicious and caused losses
to others, then you are deluded if you think it is the end of matters. You have
to ask for forgiveness and if forgiveness is not given still you are subject to
karma, to suffering in repayment.
LIFE IS FRAUGHT WITH GRAVE DANGERS OF FUTURE
SUFFERING AND THE WISE WILL SEEK TO UNDERSTAND TRULY THE LAWS OF KARMA. UNLESS
YOU WANT YOUR HEAD CHOPPED, THINK CAREFULLY WHAT YOU SAY BECAUSE IT IS NOT
ENOUGH TO APOLOGIZE. TO BE REMORSEFUL AND SEE YOUR WRONG IS BETTER THAN BEING
DEFIANT BUT IT DOES NOT ABSOLVE YOU FROM SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT IF THOSE YOU
WRONG DO NOT FORGIVE YOU OR YOU ARE TOO PROUD TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS.
This is a form of false perception and
understanding that leads to future woe.
It is never a case of whether the criticism was
responsible or irresponsible but whether there is truth or not in it.
WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER THE CRITICISM IS CORRECT OR
NOT, NOT RESPONSIBLE OR IRRESPONSIBLE AND SO YOU DO NOT REALIZE YOU ARE HEADING
FOR INSANITY.
Fatal shot came from front not back and
up:
The fatal shot, he says, came from
another assassin on the knoll and entered his right temple before exploding out
of the rear of his head (which means Oswald did not fire fatal shot). If he was
shot in the right temple, the assassin must have
been ahead of the presidential car in the knoll area.
Mr Smith believes Oswald was a CIA spy, who was also doing shady work for the FBI.
He believes the shot to his back did come from the sixth floor of the depository or another nearby building, but Oswald was not the shooter.
He also claims two other rifle shots came from two different positions on the grassy knoll to the front and right of the presidential Lincoln, the first bullet hit him in the throat.
The fatal shot, he says, came from another assassin on the knoll and entered his right temple before exploding out of the rear of his head.
By law the post-mortem examination on the president’s body should have been carried out in Dallas, where he was killed, but the body was flown to Washington and the autopsy carried out at Bethesda Naval Hospital.
One witness at the scene reported that the president had been shot in the temple. One of the surgical team trying to save his life at Parkland Hospital in Dallas said he saw a round hole entry point by his temple but that was never properly recorded.
If he was shot in the right temple, the assassin must have been ahead of the presidential car in the knoll area.
Mr Smith said: “An examination of the skull would establish whether a bullet did enter his head at the temple, which would disprove the theory that the fatal injury came from behind.
More than 10 witnesses reported
hearing shots coming from the grassy knoll [PA]
“My belief is that several people
were involved in a well coordinated ambush which had elements of military
planning.”
More than 10 witnesses reported hearing shots coming from the knoll.
Another key fact which has never been satisfactorily explained is that a deputy sheriff swore that the rifle found in the depository was a German Mauser and not Oswald’s Carcano rifle.
Moments after the sound of shots were heard a police officer ran into the depository and saw Oswald, who was on the second floor. Saying he would not now get any work done, Oswald left the building soon after.
Incredibly, the police issued an all points bulletin on him within 15 minutes of him leaving the building.
An officer who saw him 40 minutes later was shot dead by Oswald, who was arrested for that crime only.
He was later charged with killing the president but denied both charges and, as the world knows, never gave his account in court. He was gunned down by nightclub owner Jack Ruby two days later.
More than 10 witnesses reported hearing shots coming from the knoll.
Another key fact which has never been satisfactorily explained is that a deputy sheriff swore that the rifle found in the depository was a German Mauser and not Oswald’s Carcano rifle.
Moments after the sound of shots were heard a police officer ran into the depository and saw Oswald, who was on the second floor. Saying he would not now get any work done, Oswald left the building soon after.
Incredibly, the police issued an all points bulletin on him within 15 minutes of him leaving the building.
An officer who saw him 40 minutes later was shot dead by Oswald, who was arrested for that crime only.
He was later charged with killing the president but denied both charges and, as the world knows, never gave his account in court. He was gunned down by nightclub owner Jack Ruby two days later.
Film showed JFK hit from front and right
not back and up:
Zapruder the man who took the only film record,
actually forgot to take his camera along and went back to fetch it and his film
is the only record of the assassination.
It is clear from what I saw on the website that JFK
was already hit and he was slumping forwards and inwards towards his wife who
leaned over to care for him when a shot from the front hit his temple with a
shower of debris that was his shattered brain and skull which was actually
blown yards away and found later on the road.
ON THE FILM, THE DESTRUCTIVE FATAL SHOT CAME FROM
THE FRONT AND RIGHT OF KENNEDY AS HE WAS ALREADY SLUMPED TOWARDS HIS WIFE WHO
LEANED TO CARE FOR HM AND THE SHOT CAUSED A BIG SPLASH ON HIS TEMPLE AND PUSHED
HIM BACK AND TOWARDS HIS LEFT WHICH MEANS IT CAME FROM THE FRONT AND RIGHT OF
THE CAR THAT HAD ALREADY PASSED THE BOOK DEPOSITORY BUILDING.
Why did CIA and FBI cover up?
It looks like the president was set up by his own
security services, by the CIA and he was the target of a carefully planned
shooting alley.
The reason why the CIA would cover up is because it
is implicated, involved, why would the CIA cover up for Castro or the mafia or
Russia?
Why shot must come from front and right:
When the shot hit the president his (slumped) head
was thrown back and to his left suggest the shot came from his front and right
or the front and right of the car which I think had already passed the
depository and so Oswald could not have been responsible for the fatal
destructive shot but someone in front and right on the grassy knoll was
responsible.
MANKIND LIKES TO WORSHIP AND TALK ABOUT SCIENCE,
THIS IS SCIENCE FOR YOU AND YET EVEN THIS PEOPLE DISPUTE.
A concerted, high level cover up:
The assassination of JFK appears to have been a
concerted high level cover-up that could not have occurred without the
cooperation and connivance of very high level officials in the CIA, FBI and
government. Why would they do such a thing unless it is to cover up their own
culpability or involvement.
WITHOUT A CONCERTED HIGH LEVEL EFFORT, THE JFK
ASSASSINATION COVER UP COULD NOT HAVE SUCCEEDED.
AMERICA NOT JUST PEOPLE LIKE NIXON, IS A VERY DIRTY
CUT THROAT PLACE, BEHIND THE SMILING FACADES OF PEOPLE LIKE BUSH MAY HIDE
MURDERERS AND LONG FANGS.
Four shots? You only get one shot at the
president:
According to the official version Oswald had to
fire furiously four times in succession and hit the president with at least two
of his shots.
Professional marksmen have to do homework, set the
sights of their guns and they only get one (carefully aimed) shot at the
president, there is no time for second or third shots which is why there was a
succession of marksmen waiting to take pot shots at the president.
The trajectory of the fatal JFK shot:
Eye witnesses said there was a gaping neck EXIT
(not entry) wound and this could have been the deflected exit wound of the
powerful armoured bullet that came in from the front and right of the president
slightly above horizontal, hit him on the right forehead, shattered his skull
and brain (a big piece of his skull was found towards the left rear of the
vehicle where the incident occurred). After shattering the president’s skull
and brain, the bullet was unscathed and was deflected internally by bony
structures to exit in his neck as the big unusual bullet the experienced nurse
who held the president’s head throughout the resuscitation saw and went missing
afterwards as part of the cover-up.
The alleged assassin said he was aiming at the
president’s eye but as he pulled the trigger the president lurched forward
(probably from another bullet) causing him to miss and hit his right forehead.
The reason for aiming for the eye may be because the eye is a weak point for
the bullet to enter the brain, gave maximal chance of a kill.
The grassy knoll was an ideal vantage point for an
assassin. There was a convenient car park behind to park the car for a quick
entrance and exit and carry the weapon up the knoll which provided a very close
unobstructed grandstand view as the president car swept by towards it. People
below the knoll reported hearing shots behind them but they were ignored. The
knoll had a wall to rest the weapon and it was shaded by trees so that the
assassin would be hidden.
FROM THE ZAPRUDER FILM THE BULLET CAME IN FROM THE
FRONT AND RIGHT OF THE PRESIDENT SLIGHTLY ABOVE HORIZONTAL AND THE IMPACT
PUSHED THE PRESIDENT’S HEAD BACK AND INWARDS TO HIS WIFE AND SO THE SHOT CANNOT
COME FROM OSWALD IF HE WAS ABOVE AND BEHIND THE PRESIDENT BUT IT MUST COME FROM
SOMEONE HIDING UNDER TREES BEHIND THE WALL ON THE ELEVATED GRASSY KNOLL.
AND SO WHAT MIGHT BE THE STORY OF THE ASSASINATION?
THE PRESIDENT WAS BLAMED FOR THE BAY OF PIGS FIASCO
WHICH MAY HAVE CAUSED THE DEATHS OF DISSIDENT CUBANS AND THOSE WHO WERE FRIENDS
OR RELATIVES WANTED REVENGE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT AND THEIR CIA MASTERS TOO
SUFFERED LOSSES, THE CIA HEAD DULLES WAS DISMISSED AND SO THE CIA KNEW ABOUT
THE PLOT TO KILL THE PRESIDENT THAT THEY NOT ONLY DID NOTHING TO ELIMINATE BUT
THEY WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY TO FACILITATE, HELP ORGANIZE AND THEN COVER UP.
Oswald may not even have fired the shots, he was
said to be a CIA operative and his purpose in the scheme was to become the
scapegoat. The building of the book depository belonged to a Bush linked
company and he may have been hired so that he was present there and it was said
the weapon found at the window was a different brand from what was produced at
the Warren Commission.
The president was still alive at
resuscitation:
Even though his brain was shattered and he was
losing lots of blood, the president was still alive and breathing because the
vital (automatic) brain stem centres controlling breathing and the heart were
still intact. He was losing a lot of blood but they transfused
him and so it was a painful traumatic desperate, irrational ultimately vain
fight for his life.
PEOPLE SELDOM DIE EASILY, WHEN THEIR LIVES ARE
TAKEN FROM THEM, THEY AUTOMATICALLY RESIST AND FIGHT AND IT IS ONLY WHEN THE
DARK FORCE OF DEATH PREVAILS OVER THEM, THE KING OF DEATH IS VICTORIOUS THAT
THEY FINALLY SUCCUMB NEVER IN HAPPINESS BUT DESPAIR TO DEPART AND ARISE
ELSEWHERE AGAIN.
A vision can either be correct or wrong never dated
and outdated.
If Dr M’s vision was correct then it will always be
correct.
The statement implies falsely that the vision was
correct then but outdated now and that is delusion and misleads others with
karma attached not merit.
EITHER DR M’S VISION IS CORRECT OR WRONG, IT CANNOT
BE OUTDATED NOW WHICH IS A FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT LEADS TO SUFFERING NEVER
HAPPINESS.
TRUTH IS FOREVER NOT IN THE PAST OR NOW ONLY.
Dr M’s fad not vision:
If what you are talking about is Dr M’s fad and you
think it is vision, then you are fool who does not understand. Fads and
fashions (and trends) always become outdated because they are false and
dependent on whim or stirred mental force and delusion, the truth remains true
always, what is truly good will always be good never turn to bad.
Exposed: The myth of the
global warming 'pause'
(If you think
scientists are scrupulous people, not subject to bribes, inducements and
sentiments or emotion to support one or other theory you are deluded)Two university scientists have found that the “pause” or “hiatus” in global temperatures can be largely explained by a failure of climate researchers to record the dramatic rise in Arctic temperatures over the past decade or more.
When Kevin Cowtan of York University and Robert Way of Ottawa University found a way of estimating Arctic temperatures from satellite readings, the so-called pause effectively disappeared and the global warming signal returned as strong as before.
The paucity of surface-temperature records in the remote and inaccessible Arctic has long been recognised as a problem for global estimates, not least by the Met Office itself.
Why Jackie climbed up the roof of the
boot:
In the Zapruder film, Jackie could be seen climbing
up the roof of the boot after her husband was shot and she appears to be trying
to catch pieces of his skull as it tumbled away with the moving car. It shows
the shot came from the front, Zapruder said he was standing near the underpass
which is beyond the book depository.
Life magazine bought the film and it seems some
frames were damaged. Life magazine is owned by Luce a member of skulls and
bones like Bush.
On 22nd November, 1963, Abraham
Zapruder filmed the motorcade of President John F. Kennedy.
He later explained to Wesley
J. Liebelerabout the background to the filming. "I didn't have my
camera but my secretary (Lillian Rogers) asked me why I don't have it and I
told her I wouldn't have a chance even to see the President and somehow she
urged me and I went home and got my camera." According to Jim Marrs:
"Zapruder made a fourteen-mile round trip drive home to pick up his
camera.By the time he returned, crowds were already gathering to watch the
motorcade." Zapruder told the Warren Commission:
"I thought I might take pictures from the window because my building is
right next to the building where the alleged assassin was, and it's just across
501 Elm Street, but I figured - I may go down and get better pictures, and I
walked down. I believe it was Elm Street and on down to the lower part, closer to the underpass and I was trying to pick a
space from where to take those pictures and I tried one place and it was on a
narrow ledge and I couldn't balance myself very much. I tried another place and
that had some obstruction of signs or whatever it was there and finally I found
a place farther down near the underpass that was a square of concrete I don't
know what you call it maybe about 4 feet high." Zapruder decided to take
his receptionist, Marilyn
Sitzman, with him to Dealey
Plaza.
Impossible Oswald shot president:
I have just seen a location map depicting events on
that day and it showed the presidential limousine had already passed the Dallas
book house and Oswald was behind when the limousine approached Zapruder and the
underpass when he was shot from the front and right that means the fatal shot
must come from the front never the book depository.
Why would Oswald wait until limousine was
receding to shoot?
The route of the motorcade took the presidential
limousine straight towards the Dallas book depository and it then made a sharp
left turn to recede towards the underpass and the shots that hit the president
happened when the motorcade had passed and was receding from the Book
Depository and so if Oswald shot the president he would have shot much earlier
when the limousine was approaching front on for an extended period of time, not
wait until it had passed and was receding.
THE LIMOUSINE ACTUALLY APPROACHED HEAD ON TOWARDS
THE BUILDING AND THEN VEERED AWAY ON THE LEFT SO IF OSWALD WANTED TO SHOOT THE
PRESIDENT THE IDEAL TIME WAS WHEN IT WAS APPROACHING NOT AS IT WAS RECEDING.
Oswald seen buying coke seconds after
shots:
There are apparently witnesses who testified they
saw Oswald two floors below buying and drinking coke even seconds after the
shots which means it is impossible he shot the president if that was true.
And so Oswald may be a secret CIA man brought in to
be a dummy for the blame.
Motorcade route may have been set up for
ambush:
It may not be accident but JFK’s motorcade route
was planned to bring him to the ideal sniper’s alley by the organizer and so it
seems even those in charge of his routine may be implicated in the
assassination.
The motorcade had already wend its way down Main
Street with ample opportunities for the public to see the president and it
could have proceeded straight down Main Street out of town where there were
further space for people to line the street, yet why was the motorcade directed
to turn right into Elm Street straight towards the Book Depository and then
turn sharp left in a sweeping curve that exposed the flank of the president in
an area that can be described as a sniper’s alley. The president was actually a
sitting duck, he was close to the snipers’ hideouts and so he had to run the
sniper’s gauntlet at close range.
THE ROUTE COULD HAVE BEEN CHOSEN FOR THE PRESIDENT
TO PROCEED STRAIGHT DOWN MAIN STREET SO WAS IT COINCIDENT OR HE WAS DELIBERATELY
DIVERTED DOWN ELM STREET AND THENCE INTO A SWEEPING CURVE THAT WOULD BE A
SNIPER’S DREAM OF IDEAL SHOOTING RANGE WHERE HE WAS ‘EASY MEAT’ FOR
PROFESSIONAL SHARP SHOOTERS?
AND SO DID THE PLOT TO KILL THE PRESIDENT EXTEND
EVEN TO THE ROUTE PLANNER?
|
BBC:
Bush's Grandfather Planned Fascist Coup In America
New investigation sheds light on clique of powerbrokers, including Prescott Bush, who sought to overthrow U.S. government and implement Hitlerian policies |
|
Paul
Joseph Watson
Prison Planet Tuesday, July 24, 2007 |
A BBC Radio
4 investigation sheds new light on a major subject that has received little
historical attention, the conspiracy on behalf of a group of influential
powerbrokers, led by Prescott Bush, to overthrow FDR and implement a fascist
dictatorship in the U.S. based around the ideology of Mussolini and Hitler.
In 1933,
Marine Corps Maj.-Gen. Smedley Butler was approached by a wealthy and secretive
group of industrialists and bankers, including Prescott Bush the current
President's grandfather, who asked him to command a 500,000 strong rogue army
of veterans that would help stage a coup to topple then President Franklin
Delano Roosevelt.
According to the BBC, the plotters intended to impose a
fascist takeover and "Adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat
the great depression."
(Article
continues below)
The
conspirators were operating under the umbrella of a front group called the
American Liberty League, which included many families that are still household
names today, including Heinz, Colgate, Birds Eye and General Motors.
Butler
played along with the clique to determine who was involved but later blew the
whistle and identified the ringleaders in testimony given to the House
Committee on un-American Activities.
However, the
Committee refused to even question any of the individuals named by Butler and
his testimony was omitted from the record, leading
to charges that they were involved in covering the matter up, and the
majority of the media blackballed the story.
General Smedley Butler, author of the famous quote "war is a racket", exposed the fascist plotters but was subsequently demonized and shunned by the government and the media.
In 1936,
William Dodd, the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, wrote a letter to President
Roosevelt in which he stated,
"A
clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant
our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in
Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to
witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi
regime.... A prominent executive of one of the largest corporations, told me
point blank that he would be ready to take definite action to bring fascism
into America if President Roosevelt continued his progressive policies. Certain
American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes
into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy
the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there. Propagandists for
fascist groups try to dismiss the fascist scare. We should be aware of the
symptoms. When industrialists ignore laws designed for social and economic
progress they will seek recourse to a fascist state when the institutions of
our government compel them to comply with the provisions."
The proven
record of Prescott Bush's involvement in financing the Nazi war machine
dovetails with the fact that he was part of a criminal cabal that actively
sought to impose a fascist coup in America.
Prescott did
not succeed but many would argue that two generations down the line the mission
has all but been accomplished.
In his documentary film Martial Law, Alex Jones interviews
John Buchanan, who was instrumental in uncovering the documents tying Prescott
Bush to the financing of the Third Reich. Watch a clip above. The subject is
also covered in Alex's upcoming film, End Game, which includes rare video of
Smedley Butler's testimony.
Bush clan wields
considerable political clout:
Even from long ago it appears the Bush clan
together with a cabal of like minded rich Americans (Skull and Bones secret
society) wielded considerable political clout that enabled them to escape
prosecution with impunity.
The House committee on un-American acts refused to
investigate Bush’s seriously fascist actions even when it was informed
indicating behind the scenes protection from prosecution that is considerable.
Anyone who invites others to debate with him is a
fool heaping karma because it is an invitation to verbally fight and the truth
about any matter is singular and applies to everyone and it is not subject to
debate, you do not need to debate to find out the truth but you need
discernment, the ability to see things as it actually is.
NOTHING IS SUBJECT TO DEBATE, WHAT IS RIGHT OR
WRONG, TRUE OR FALSE CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED AND SHOULD BE ABIDED BY
EVERYONE AND SO WHOEVER INVITES OTHERS TO DEBATE IS DELUDED AND HEAPING KARMA
TO BE EXPERIENCED AS FUTURE SUFFERING.
1975 House Select Committee concluded probable
conspiracy:
I was correct to say Jackie Kennedy appeared to
scramble onto the boot to catch part of her husband’s skull which meant he was
shot from the front when Oswald was behind.
A House committee concluded probable conspiracy in
1975 and yet no one was prosecuted.
NOT ONLY WAS THERE A CONSPIRACY, IT WENT UP TO THE
HIGHEST LEVELS AND THE PRESIDENT WAS SET UP, HIS ROUTE ARRANGED TO TAKE HIM TO
THE SLAUGHTER AND THERE WAS A CONCERTED SUCCESSFUL COVER UP AT THE HIGHEST
LEVEL.
Quote: Most Americans did not see
the Zapruder film in motion until March 1975, when ABC News aired a copy during
Geraldo Rivera's weekly 'Good Night America' show.
The outcry helped spur formation of
the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which would famously conclude
that the murder was most likely the result of a
conspiracy involving multiple shooters.
Acting on instinct: Jacqueline
Kennedy would later say she had no memory of
crawling onto the Lincoln's trunk to retrieve parts of her husband's skull
Minsk's fond memories of Lee
Harvey Oswald
"I just
liked the guy," says Ernst Titovets, a medical student who attached
himself to Lee Harvey Oswald after the American defector's arrival in Minsk,
then the capital of the Soviet republic of Byelorussia, in 1959.
The pair went
to dances and concerts together, they both enjoyed practical jokes, and both
energetically chased young female students.
Titovets,
who spoke good English, was able to play Cupid's helper when Oswald met his
future wife, Marina, whom he describes as "attractive in a raw sexual sort
of way".
What did he
think when he heard Oswald named as the man who had killed Kennedy, and then
was himself shot?
A year after
leaving Minsk, the world knew the face of Lee Harvey Oswald
"I
couldn't believe my ears," says Titovets, now a spry 75-year-old bio
researcher. "I deeply believe he was innocent. He was incapable of killing
anybody."
Oswald may have been deliberately vilified as a
crackpot, he may have been a CIA agent all along and was posted to the Book
Depository to act as the fall guy.
THERE WAS AN ELABORATE CONSPIRACY TO KILL THE
PRESIDENT AND HIS ROUTE MAY HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY PLANNED TO LEAD HIM TO AN
AMBUSH WHERE TOP MARKSMEN WERE WAITING TO TAKE POT SHOTS AT THE PRESIDENT, THEY
ARRANGED A FALL GUY WHO WAS ACTUALLY SEEN TWO FLOORS BELOW SHORTLY AFTER THE
SHOOTING. A MASSIVE COVER-UP REACHING THE HIGHEST LEVELS ENSUED BECAUSE THE
INCRIMINATING BULLET A NURSE WITNESSED WAS DISAPPEARED.
Patriots to their pockets and cronies:
Many like to tout themselves as great patriots but
they are self serving to their own and by extension their cronies’ interests
and incapable of loving others.
And so it is the American political and power scene
including those in the shadows, the power brokers like to present themselves as
great patriots but they are not loyal except to themselves and those aligned
with them and they will kill and do all sorts of things that harm the country
they claim they love.
In the same way many in UMNO beat their chests and
claim great patriotism but it is mostly if not totally for show, they are not
even loyal to themselves, they will sell their souls and bodies to the devil
for a price.
Rehashing requires detachment from
reality:
Whenever a person rehashes, he must pause, step
back, introvert to focus on reeling off what is recorded so that it is timed
correctly and varied to suit the requirements and so if you keep rehashing you
become very good at detaching from reality which is not only suffering but
dangerous because your mind is not with the present.
FOR ONE WHO SEES CORRECTLY EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD
IS REHASHING EVERYTHING THEY SAY AND DO RATHER THAN FRESHLY COMPOSING AND THIS
NECESSITATES A DETACHMENT FROM REALITY WHILST THEY ARE REELING OUT WHAT IS
RECORDED AND IT IS ALWAYS A TORMENTING EXISTENCE AND DANGEROUS, EXPOSES HIM TO
MANY LURKING DANGERS LIKE PICK POCKETS.
Always poisonously nice never truly good:
For one who sees correctly this is a world where
everyone is always (not sometimes) poisonously nice never truly good to others.
Whatever said or done that is rehashed, has
accompanied prolonging (eg of syllables), changes of speed and strength of
force (loudness) is nice never good and it is poisonous because it is never
true but a counterfeit generalized statement, bombards others with force that is
unnecessary that leads to stress, restlessness, divides their concentration and
incites them to harmfully stir their mental forces to like, dislike, be sad,
hurt, confused or fearful.
BECAUSE THERE IS CONSTANT STYLE OR STRETCHING OF
SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF EVERYONE HERE AND
THIS CAUSES TERRIBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, DISTRACTION AND HARMFULLY STIRS
OTHERS MENTAL FORCES TO BE EMOTIONAL, THEY ARE ALWAYS POISONOUSLY NICE NEVER
TRULY GOOD.
Truly born again in spirit:
Jesus said that unless a man is born again in
spirit he cannot go to heaven.
To be transformed from someone who is always
poisonously nice never truly good to a person who is always good never
poisonously nice would be truly to be born again.
Because everyone here is poisonously nice they must
ALL be born again shed of their constant poisonous niceness to go to heaven.
BECAUSE EVERYONE HERE IS POISONOUSLY NICE THEY MUST
BE BORN AGAIN SHED OFF THEIR POISONOUS NICENESS, REHASHED PROLONGING, CHANGING
SPEED AND STRENGTH, TO GO TO HEAVEN.
President was a sitting duck for any self
respecting sniper:
Dealey Plaza Park in Dallas is still very much like
it was when JFK was assassinated and visiting it on Google Earth, I saw the
president was a sitting duck no decent professional sniper could possibly miss.
The Book Depository would not be a good stalking ground but the tree lined
grassy knoll was close to the target and ideal, hidden with a wall and car park
behind to park and escape.
THE ROUTE CHOSEN FOR THE PRESIDENT’S MOTORCADE IS
ODD, HE COULD HAVE PASSED STRAIGHT DOWN MAIN STREET AND THERE WOULD BE NO IDEAL
SPOTS FOR SNIPERS TO HIDE BUT THE DETOUR DOWN ELM STREET WHETHER COINCIDENTAL
OR DELIBERATE, BROUGHT THE PRESIDENT WITHIN RANGE OF HIDDEN SNIPERS THAT IS SO
CLOSE NO SELF RESPECTING SNIPER WITH A SCOPE COULD POSSIBLY MISS.
SO WAS THE ROUTE PLANNED TO DELIVER THE PRESIDENT
TO ASSASSINS?
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE A TOP SNIPER, IT IS
ALMOST A CINCH TO KILL AT THAT RANGE.
And the president happened to sit
on the right side?
The grassy knoll was the ideal CLOSED UP concealed
location for a sniper but if the president had sat on the left instead of right
side it would not be ideal. The other side of the road was open and hidden
spots are much more remote, not so suitable for sniping.
AND SO, WAS IT A MERE COINCIDENCE THE PRESIDENT
HAPPENED TO SIT ON THE CORRECT SIDE FOR A SNIPER HIDDEN BEHIND A WALL TO TAKE
HIM OFF, IF HE HAD SAT ON THE OTHER SIDE, IT WOULD BE MORE DIFFICULT FOR THE
SNIPER?
IT IS EITHER A SHEER COINCIDENCE OR TOO GOOD TO BE
TRUE, PLANNED WITH MILITARY PRECISION KNOWING WHERE THE PRESIDENT WOULD BE
SITTED AND THE IDEAL SPOT FOR A CLOSE BY SNIPER TO KNOCK HIM OFF CONFIDENTLY.
This is a Reuter site heading.
Anyone with true understanding does not want to
read the Kennedy assassination through the eyes of a British (or Indian) newspaperman
and he wants to know the truth of the assassination which is not British or
Indian, if it is not the truth, what is the point of knowing the assassination
through the eyes of a British journalist?
IT REFLECTS THE DELUSION AND SILLINESS OF WELL EDUCATED
PEOPLE THAT THEY WOULD ENTERTAIN SUCH ITEMS WHEN IT IS SILLY, IRREVELANT, A
WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY. ANYONE WHO WANTS TO KNOW THE ASSASSINATION THROUGH
THE EYES OF A BRITISH NEWSPAPERMAN IS A FOOL HEADING FOR INSANITY.
Nixon was in Dallas and said Warren
Commission was biggest hoax:
Apparently Nixon admitted he was in Dallas that day
and in his White House tapes he inadvertently admitted that the Warren
Commission pulled off the biggest hoax.
It seems that Nixon was trying to deflect attention from
the fact that the plane he had taken to New York on the day of the
assassination had originated from Dallas. Indeed, Nixon (as he later admitted)
had been in Dallas on the morning of the assassination. [Note: Nixon initially
told the FBI "...that the only time he was in Dallas, Texas, during 1963
was two days prior to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy."
See: Richard Nixon's Greatest Cover-Up]
+ One of the most tantalizing nuggets about Nixon's
possible inside knowledge of JFK assassination secrets was buried on a White
House tape until 2002. On the tape, recorded in May of 1972, the president
confided to two top aides that the Warren Commission pulled off "the greatest hoax that has ever been perpetuated."
Unfortunately, he did not elaborate. But the context in which Nixon raised the
matter shows just how low he could stoop in efforts to assassinate the
character of his political adversaries.
The Republican president made the "hoax" observation in the immediate aftermath of the assassination attempt against White House hopeful George Wallace, a long-time Democratic governor of Alabama. The attempt left Wallace paralyzed below the waist. Nixon blurted out his comments about the falsity of the Warren findings in the middle of a conversation in which he repeatedly directed two of his most ruthless aides, Bob Haldeman and Chuck Colson, to carry out a monumental dirty trick.
The Republican president made the "hoax" observation in the immediate aftermath of the assassination attempt against White House hopeful George Wallace, a long-time Democratic governor of Alabama. The attempt left Wallace paralyzed below the waist. Nixon blurted out his comments about the falsity of the Warren findings in the middle of a conversation in which he repeatedly directed two of his most ruthless aides, Bob Haldeman and Chuck Colson, to carry out a monumental dirty trick.
Bush linked with CIA assassination group
of 40:
+ A photograph exists of the Texas School Book Depository while the Dallas Police is sealing off the building. Among the bystanders is a civilian that could be a twin brother of George H.W. Bush.
+ George H.W. Bush is provably lying about his CIA
career. He claims that his CIA directorship in 1976 was his first job for the
CIA. Difficult to believe? Page 3 will show the proof for this lie. The truth is that he was actively involved in the preparation
and financing of the ill faithed Bay of Pigs invasion, as a high ranking CIA
official, at which time he made acquaintance with the now notorious CIA agent and Iran Contra operative Felix Rodriguez, a
veteran of the Bay of Pigs and Operation 40.
Jim Marrs : During that time, during the
time of the Bay of Pigs, while you were training and moving around in the
Caribbean, No Name Key and all that, did you ever hear the name George Herbert
Walker Bush?
James Files: Oh Yeah!
Jim Marrs: What was his role?
James Files: George Herbert Walker Bush. I don't know if, I think a lot of people are not going to believe this, but he worked for the CIA back as early as 1961 that I know of.
Jim Marrs : How did he work? What did he do?
James Files : I don't know all he did, but he did a lot of recruiting work. I know he was there at the beginning for what we called Group 40, a special operations group, Group 40. If you wonder what Group 40 was, an assassination group.
James Files: Oh Yeah!
Jim Marrs: What was his role?
James Files: George Herbert Walker Bush. I don't know if, I think a lot of people are not going to believe this, but he worked for the CIA back as early as 1961 that I know of.
Jim Marrs : How did he work? What did he do?
James Files : I don't know all he did, but he did a lot of recruiting work. I know he was there at the beginning for what we called Group 40, a special operations group, Group 40. If you wonder what Group 40 was, an assassination group.
Operation 40 was a top secret CIA project to train
selected cuban exiles in guerrilla warfare and assassinations, aimed against
the Castro regime. Apart from Felix Rodriguez, other members were now infamous
CIA agents and Anti Castro terrorists like Luis Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch,
Guillermo and Ignacio Novo Sampoll and later Watergate plumbers Frank Sturgis,
Eugenio Martinez, Virgilio Gonzalez and E. Howard Hunt. Most of the operation
40 members were recruited from JM/Wave, a much larger clandestine operation to
train a cuban exile army for the Bay of Pigs invasion. JM/Wave is headed by CIA
official Theodore Shackley. James Files, the
confessed gunman on the grassy knoll, was recruited for the CIA by David Atlee
Phillips on a recommendation of Ted Shackley. Shackley becomes George Bush's
deputy director for Covert Operations in 1976. The CIA controller of JFK's
assassin is provably close to Shackley, Shackley is provably close to Bush. Not
significant?
Shackley's second man in command of JM/Wave is David
Sanchez Morales, who is also working close with David Atlee Phillips and
develops a reputation as "best CIA assassin for Latin America". Cuban
State security officials speculate that Morales was the "dark complexed
man" as seen by several witnesses in the 6th floor window of the Texas
School Book Depository. Just after telling friends he was afraid of his
"own people", and just before he was scheduled to testify for the
House Select Committee of Assassinations, Morales died in 1977 a sudden heart
attack under mysterious circumstances. Under influence of alcohol, he had
hinted to close friends that he had been involved in the Kennedy assassination
(We took care of that bastard, didn't we?"). Morales was a big muscular
man of very dark complexion, nicknamed "el Indio". Several witnesses
on Dealey Plaza, most of whom were not called to testify before the Warren
Commission, described a man fitting Morales. These witnesses saw such a man in
the windows of the sixth floor of the Texas School Book depository shortly
before Kennedy's motorcade passed by, as well as minutes after the shooting,
fleeing from the back of the building with two other men in a station wagon.
+ Bush and Rodriguez are still close
personal friends today, as can be well documented. In 1967 Rodriguez is heading
the CIA team that tracks down Che Guevara in Bolivia, ending with his murder.
Above is a picture of Felix
Rodriguez with a captured Che Guevara. Rodriguez still shows Guevara 's Rolex
watch and the transcripts of the interrogations to intimate friends in his
Miami home, which is decorated with photos of him and his old friend George.
Below a 1988 Christmas note from George to Felix referring to Iran-Contra
hearings.
The real gunman on the sixth floor TSBD:
Rather than Oswald, the gunman was Morales, one of
the Cuban assassins and so the question is raised how he got into the
building which is owned by Bush connected interests.
Several witnesses on Dealey Plaza, most of whom were
not called to testify before the Warren Commission, described a man fitting
Morales. These witnesses saw such a man in the windows of the sixth floor of
the Texas School Book depository shortly before
Kennedy's motorcade passed by, as well as minutes after the shooting, fleeing from the back of the building with two
other men in a station wagon.
The ambush was a modern adaptation of the typical
cowboy stagecoach ambush with bandits positioned all around the coach firing at
the passing coach. It seems there were sharp shooters stationed also at the Dal
Tex building (also owned by Bush affiliated interests) and other places as well
as the grassy knoll whose bullet ripped the president’s skull.
The president’s motorcade appears intentionally
diverted to Elm Street which was the ideal killing field.
Prescott Bush, George Bush’s father, was instrumental
in persuading Eisenhower to run for president and Nixon the VP was Prescott’s stooge
and as VP he oversaw the Cuban Bay of Pigs invasion together with George Bush
and they were angry and blamed JFK for the failure of the invasion.
Oswald insisted he was a patsy, scapegoat and so he
did not do it for fame. It seems the second and third shots were too close for
them to come from the same gun and there are allegations the gun produced at
the Warren Commission was not the same as the gun found on the sixth floor.
No comments:
Post a Comment