True or false, right or
wrong are never choices:
There is never a choice between saying or
doing what is true or false, right or wrong because for a person who can truly
understand, undertaking what is false or wrong is to embrace difficulty, danger
and suffering whereas what is true and correct is ease, safety and freedom from
suffering.
It is only for those who do not understand
and what they perceive as true and correct is also false or incorrect that they
are faced with the choice, dilemma and conflict of having to choose between
options that are all actually false, wrong and whenever you have to choose, you
are confronted with raised self-resistance that leads to stress.
BETWEEN DOING OR SAYING WHAT IS TRUE OR
FALSE, CORRECT OR WRONG, THERE IS NEVER A CHOICE BECAUSE WHAT IS FALSE AND
WRONG IS SUFFERING & DANGER WHILST WHAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT IS HAPPINESS
AND SAFE. IT IS WHEN THE PERSON DOES NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND AND WHAT HE CALLS
TRUE OR CORRECT IS ALSO FALSE AND INCORRECT THAT HE HAS TO MAKE A CHOICE BETWEEN
WHAT IS IN TRUTH FALSE VS FALSE, WRONG VERSUS WRONG.
THUS THE PERSON WHO TRULY DWELLS IN TRUTH
AND CORRECTNESS DOES NOT NEED TO MAKE CHOICES, THE ACTIONS AND SPEECHES ARE
SELF EVIDENT, IT IS ONLY IF A PERSON DWELLS IN FALSITY, HE IS FALSELY REHASHING
HIS ACTIONS AND SPEECH AND THERE ARE MULTIPLE FALSE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO CHOOSE
FROM THAT HE IS FORCED TO MAKE CHOICES WHICH IS NOT ONLY ALWAYS SUFFERING,
CONDITIONS HIM TO ALWAYS MAKE CHOICES THAT IS A SHACKLE TO FUTURE WOE AND DOOM.
Choice is poisoned chalice
of those dwelling in falsity:
Choice is actually a poisoned chalice that
leads to suffering, insanity and death, is unnatural, a necessity of falsity
not a necessity of existence and it reflects delusion that ordinary people
think nothing of choosing, even think it is lovely they are faced with choices
when sometimes the choices agonize them. If you have to make a choice all the
options available are false and harmful, incorrect, what you call the true or
correct choice is also false and incorrect for those who see correctly.
Thus to celebrate of Chinese New Year is
actually suffering but what others call not celebrating Chinese New Year is
also not true and thus suffering because the non celebration is the result of
suppression, control not genuine. When people abstain from sex it is not
because they are truly devoid of sexual urge but they painfully suppress their
urge and so it too is suffering whilst the person who has reached the higher
states of mind is devoid of sexual urge and so his abstinence is true.
The road is wide (and
littered with choices) that leads to ruin:
Jesus said, enter by the narrow gate, the
road is wide (and littered with choices) that leads to ruin and many find it.
If a person dwells in truth, it is a narrow
path without bifurcations and he has no choices to make and rather than a
deprivation, it is a happy release from the poisoned chalice of false evil
choices.
SERDANG: Ten major supermarkets and
hypermarkets nationwide will reduce prices of 4,000 selected products by up to
70% to ease the burden of the rakyat due to the rising cost of living.
UNLESS THOSE CUTS ARE PERMANENT, THEY ARE
ONLY FOR SHOW, HYPOCRITICAL AND HAS DEMERIT RATHER THAN MERIT.
A LOT OF THINGS BEING DONE OR SAID ARE NOT
TRUE, FOR SHOW ONLY AND YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO TELL AND IF YOU
CANNOT TELL THEN YOU MUST BE CYNICAL AND STRESSED BECAUSE YOUR SELF-RESISTANCE
IS STIRRED.
'Why is a great leader standing in satay town?'
Many do not realize they have a sharp
tongue that they use to stab others and the Buddha said such men will land
themselves even in hell as a result of their sarcasms.
He is speaking falsely because it is
impossible his question is genuine, he truly wants you to provide him the
answer and his praise for a great leader is hypocritical never genuine and so
he does not realize he is sticking his neck out for the noose not once but even
countless times.
CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY, JESUS SAID YOU WILL
BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY. SARCASM CAN LAND YOU IN HELL NO
MATTER HOW HANDSOME OR PRETTY YOU THINK YOU LOOK. YOU THINK IT IS FUNNY BUT
WHEN THE NOOSE TIGHTENS AROUND YOUR NECK IT WON’T BE FUNNY.
12:31pm
Minister
backs Tony Abbott's attack on ABC, saying broadcaster should be open to
''constructive criticism''.
Even prime ministers and ministers are
deluded, do not understand, so what do you expect from ordinary people?
Tony Abbot accused ABC of being unpatriotic
and that is a deluded criticism that only deluded fools can make, not prime
ministers.
ABC is a news organisation and news is
about accurate reporting of happenings, what kind of ‘news’ is it if it is
distorted, patriotic or favouring one side?
THE DUTY OF ANY NEWS ORGANIZATION, IT DOES
NOT MATTER WHAT COUNTRY IS TO REPORT THE TRUTH, ACCURATELY CONVEY EVENTS THAT
HAVE HAPPENED, NOT TO BE PATRIOTIC OR CONSERVATIVE OR LIBERAL AND SO YOU HAVE A
FOOL WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING BEING THE PRIME MINISTER OF AUSTRALIA.
There are no home truths about anything,
whatever is a home truth is not the truth. Truth is the truth, there are no
home truths and so it reflects delusion, a lack of true understanding and gullibility
that people subscribe to such fallacies.
This is evidence people have false
perception that they perceive such a thing as home truth. If something is true,
it is the truth not home truth.
Anything said out of
understanding is never a choice:
Whatever specifically said (or done) out of
true understanding of what is happening is never a choice, does not require
choice or deciding, before you can have choice you must have before mentally
options that you can apply for the situation which means to say what you are
going to say or do is chose out of those options, existed virtually in your
mind before you activated or expressed them in speech or action.
ANYTHING SAID AFTER TRUE UNDERSTANDING IS
NEVER A CHOICE, DOES NOT INVOLVE CHOOSING WHICH REQUIRES VIRTUAL MENTAL
ALTERNATIVES PRESENTING TO YOUR MIND OF WHAT TO SAY OR DO THAT YOU HAVE TO
CHOOSE FROM FOR THERE TO BE A CHOICE. WHATEVER IS A CHOICE IS A SELF-CHALLENGE
AND SUFFERING AND CONDITIONING AND SO A PERSON WHO TRULY UNDERSTANDS IS
RELEASED FROM THE CURSE OF ALWAYS HAVING TO DECIDE WHAT TO SAY OR DO FROM HIS
VAST LIBRARY OF RECORDED POSSIBILITIES.
The library is closed, so
what is there to choose from?
The person who has ceased being a robot to
become a real person has permanently closed, sealed his mental library of
recordings of possible actions and speeches that he can turn to, to choose and
so when he is confronted with a situation he has no other recourse but to
freshly fashion an answer according to his understanding which is true and so
his speech or action is always correct for the situation without involving
choice.
Why Amanda Knox implicated in Kercher’s
death:
Quote: Knox
told police she had "covered her ears as he [Lumumba] killed" Miss
Kercher in the house the girls shared.
You do not need all the jazz about DNA
evidence. By her admission above she was present at the scene of Kercher’s
death and she was implicating the barman she worked for, Lumumba, as the person
who killed her and he did not do it, he was not at the scene, then the guilty
finger turns to her because she has inadvertently admitted to being present at
the crime scene.
Is U.S. economic growth
sustainable?
January 30,
2014, 6:36 PM|The U.S. economy grew 3.7 percent during the second half of 2013,
the strongest growth rate in a decade. While consumer spending was stronger
than expected, the biggest headwinds came from Washington. Deutsche Bank
economist Carl Riccadonna tells Anthony Mason it looks like the private sector
is finally "getting some legs."
What is said above is confused
ramblings that reflect no true understanding of what would be sustainable
economic growth. By private sector getting some legs is meant private companies
getting some strength or momentum.
The US economy is dependent on
consumption that can be the government, the population or private companies and
so for sustainable growth, consumption must be strong and growing which not
possible because the system (masses, governments and even private companies)
are saddled with much debt.
IT IS THE BUILD UP OF CRIPPLING EVEN
UNPAYABLE DEBT SPENT WASTEFULLY ON CONSUMPTION WITH LITTLE OR NOT RETURNS THAT
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CURRENT RECESSION AND WITHOUT LIFTING THE PALL OF DEBT
FROM THE MAJOR PLAYERS (SOMETHING NOT POSSIBLE) THERE CAN BE NO SUSTAINABLE
GROWTH AND YOU CAN STOP WASTING YOUR TIME AND ENERGY PEERING HERE AND THERE FOR
SIGNS OF SUSTAINABLE GROWTH. MANY BIG COMPANIES ARE DEPENDENT ON DEBT TO STAY
ALIVE IN TANDEM WITH CONSUMERS AND GOVERNMENTS DROWNING IN DEBT.
Duality is false and
whatever is false lead to suffering:
The Buddha was falsely purported to teach
duality and deluded men see duality everywhere eg (black versus white, male vs
female, true vs false, good vs bad) and they become fascinated and perceive it
as the order of things, the truth and they become obsessed with duality not
realizing they are deluded, grasping at what is false that is embracing
suffering and death.
It is precisely that this is a false world
(the Buddha said whatever is changing is deceptive, only Nibbana the changeless
is true) that there are opposites (sex, charges, etc) which inevitable lead to
conflict or antagonism or suffering and it is precisely because you are
deluded, enraptured by this phantasm of apparent (not true) falsities that you
are trapped here suffering and dying endlessly. The Buddha said to one who sees
there is nothing what more duality?
Male and female exist and they are
dependent on each other but in truth the differences between the sexes are more
apparent than true, males have breasts too, the male and female sexual organs
reflect a diversion of development rather than true difference, the clitoris is
the underdeveloped penis, the labia minora the male scrotum, the testis is the
male ovary.
THE BUDDHA SAID WHATEVER IS CHANGING IS
FALSE AND SUFFERING, ONLY NIBBANA THE CHANGELESS IS TRUE AND SO IF YOU ARE
FASCINATED BY DUALITY AND THINK IT IS TRUE AND ABSOLUTE WHEN IT IS FALSE AND
DECEPTIVE, A PRODUCT OF THINKING THAT IS FALSE AND SUFFERING THEN YOU ARE
TRAPPED HERE ENDLESSLY SUFFERING AND DYING UNTIL YOU ARE DISENCHANTED WITH THE
DUALITY OF THINGS, NO LONGER CHAMPION IT AND SEEK THE PEACE AND REST OF
COMPLETE CESSATION.
Duality is an occupation of
the mind and suffering:
Duality is an occupation of the mind and
whatever is an occupation of the mind is suffering compared with a non-occupied
mind. It is because your mind has always been occupied (by thinking) and you
have never tasted the incomparable release from suffering afforded by an
unoccupied mind that you cherish the concept of duality.
YOUR MIND HAS ALWAYS BEEN OCCUPIED BY
THOUGHT AND CONTENT, YOU HAVE NEVER TASTED THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM
SUFFERING OF AN UNOCCUPIED OR UNTHINKING MIND SO THAT YOU EAGERLY, FOOLISHLY
SUBSCRIBE TO CONCEPTS LIKE DUALITY AND ACCEPT IT AS ABSOLUTELY TRUE WHEN IT IS
AN OCCUPATION OF THE MIND, DELUSION AND LEADS TO SUFFERING AND DEATH EVEN
ETERNALLY.
EVEN IF THERE IS MALE AND FEMALE, POSITIVE
AND NEGATIVE THESE ARE RELATIVE, SOMETHING THAT YOU MUST PROGRAM YOURSELF TO
AND IT IS BONDAGE, SUFFERING, A PRISON THAT MAY TRAP YOU FOR MANY ETERNITIES.
Duality is the opposite of
what the Buddha taught:
The Buddha said that whoever makes an
acquisition in this world is a fool heading for suffering.
If you think he is just referring to
wealth, property, females, fame, you are deluded.
DUALITY TOO IS AN ACQUISITION, AN
INTELLECTUAL ACQUISITION, A DELUSION THAT IS JUST AS DEADLY AS MATERIAL
ACQUISITION IN TERMS OF FUTURE SUFFERING.
WHAT THE BUDDHA TAUGHT IS NOT DUALITY BUT
ABANDONING, THE REMAINDERLESS ABANDONING OF EVERYTHING, SELF, CONSCIOUSNESS,
PERCEPTIONS, INTELLECTUAL CONCEIT. THE BUDDHA SAID TO ONE WHO SEES THERE IS
NOTHING, WHAT MORE THERE IS DUALITY? IT IS BECAUSE YOU DON’T SEE THAT YOU SEE
DUALITY AND THAT WILL BE TO YOUR ETERNAL DEATH AND SUFFERING THAN HAPPINESS.
Why duality is a delusion
and programming:
Duality is never something a person can see
like you can see an apple, a PC or you and me but duality is a concept that a
person has to form himself or be introduced by others and then he starts to see
things around in terms of this duality he has been ‘taught’ and if he becomes
obsesses he begins to see everything in terms of duality. To most people who
subscribe to duality, it is only sometimes that they summon the concept of
duality to their minds and see things according to the duality, often they
forget all about duality and thus fail to see things according to this duality.
UNLIKE AN APPLE OR YOU AND ME, NO ONE CAN
TRULY SEE DUALITY, IT IS MERELY A CONCEPT OR THEORY OR FABRICATION OF THINKING
THAT THOSE WHO SUBSCRIBE REMEMBER AND START TO SEE THINGS IN TERMS OF DUALITY
AND OFTEN DUALITY DORMANT LIKE MANY OTHER DIFFERENT DELUSIONS THAT CLOG THEIR
MINDS AND IT IS ONLY OCCASIONS WHEN DUALITY CROSS THEIR MINDS, RISE TO THE
SURFACE DO THEY THEN SEE THINGS ACCORDING TO THIS DUALITY.
WITHOUT REMEMBERING AND REHASHING DUALITY
YOU CANNOT KEEP ALIVE DUALITY IN YOUR MIND, YOU DO NOT NEED TO REMEMBER AN
APPLE, YOU RECOGNIZE AN APPLE WHEN YOU SEE ONE.
Duality is relative and
suffering not absolute:
Whatever duality you detect is not absolute,
immutable but it is relative and suffering.
Thus physical laws are not final,
immutable. The Devil said the Buddha can turn a mountain into gold if he wanted
to, Jesus said you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done, it is
possible to walk on water, fly in the air and walk through walls. The Buddha
can stop any man splitting a log with an axe if he wants to.
In Buddhism there are cases of people who
have changed sex without operations from male to female.
THE LAWS AND REALITIES OF THIS WORLD ARE
NOT IMMUTABLE BUT CAN BE CIRCUMVENTED AND SO WHATEVER DUALITY IS RELATIVE NOT
ABSOLUTE OR IMMUTABLE. THE EARTH’S NORTH AND SOUTH POLES HAVE SWITCHED IN THE
PAST.
Currency crisis at Chinese
banks 'could trigger global meltdown’
Apparently Chinese banks starved of credit,
have been tapping international markets and their foreign debts have been
rising to even past US$1 trillion now and makes them and China vulnerable to
currency attacks.
Borrowing internationally comes with
dangers and in recent years Chinese banks have looked to international sources
of funds perhaps starved off funds locally and this is a dangerous situation
and reflects an irresponsible financial management.
BBC TV
presenter Dr Michael Mosley has infected himself with a series of parasites in
an effort to understand how they affect the human body.
Faced with such news, a person can either
truly understand it or he does not, in which case he must stir resistance that
leads to stress and conditions him to resist whatever is presented to him.
Faced with such news ordinary people
understand falsely by stirring emotions, they may be disgusted (dislike), laugh
and mock or they may be interested (attracted).
What is the correct understanding?
This is supposedly a person of science or
rationality but his actions are sensationalistic and foolish. There are risks
of exposing yourself to worms that he cannot be fully certain and why is he doing
it when there is no necessity to expose himself to danger? The reason is to
gain fame or draw attention, to challenge or stir others and all these are
false reasons.
IF YOU ARE A DOCTOR AND SCIENCE IS SUPPOSED
TO BE PURE REASON, WHY ARE YOU EXPOSING YOURSELF TO WORMS FOOLISHLY AND WHY ARE
YOU COURTING PUBLICITY? THUS THIS PERSON CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH HIS FINDINGS,
HE IS AN EMOTIONAL FOOLISH MAN DOING SOMETHING RISKY FOR HIMSELF UNNECESSARY
FOR THE SAKE OF ATTENTION.
EVEN IF YOU KNOW WORMS VERY WELL, YOU
CANNOT BE SURE THEY DO NOT HARBOUR SERIOUS HARM EG GET INTO YOUR BRAIN OR LAY
EGGS IN YOUR BRAIN AND KILL YOU.
Your gut flora is not there
to protect you:
It is simplistic and dangerous to think the
bacteria usually residing in your gut is to protect you and help you. There are
basically there to thrive for themselves and whilst you may derive benefits
from their presence, from substances they produce and their eliminating or
crowding out pathological bacteria, there is likely if not certainly that this
friendly bacteria also convey detriment.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE EVERYONE (AND THAT
INCLUDES BACTERIA) HAS AN UNWRITTEN CONTRACT TO KILL EACH OTHER OFF THAT YOU
IGNORE TO YOUR OWN CHAGRIN LATER. ONLY IN HEAVEN, THE UPPER REALMS ARE BEINGS
TRULY NEVER HARMFUL TO EACH OTHER.
AND SO TO THINK CERTAIN BACTERIAL FLORA IN
YOUR GUT AND BODY ARE TOTAL FRIENDS IS DELUSION, THEY ARE THERE TO MAKE USE OF
YOU IN ORDER TO SURVIVE AND THEY MAY BE GIVE YOU SOME PROTECTION BUT THEY WILL
ALSO CAUSE SOME HARMFUL EFFECTS THAT ULTIMATELY CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR DEGRADATION
AND DEATH.
You are your worst enemy and
you expect a bacterium to be your friend?
The Buddha said all ordinary people have
suffering as vast as an ocean and eternity and that is result of the conduct of
the person, never others and so that would make you your own worst enemy.
For one who sees correctly people are
responsible largely for the stress, restlessness, daze, inability to
concentrate, robotic rehashing that they suffer terribly from and even if they
refute and cannot see, they are actually their worst enemies.
For a person who is his own worst enemy, he
is a fool to expect friends in this world, to believe the bacteria in his gut
are his friend helping to protect him. Even your bodyguards can get you killed,
may accidentally discharge a gun that kills you.
THIS IS A WORLD WHERE YOU WILL BE WISE TO
KNOW YOU ARE ALONE, WITHOUT ANY FRIENDS LET ALONE BEST FRIENDS, EVERYTHING
INCLUDING THE SUN, WIND, HOT AND COLD, FOOD AND WATER WHILE SUSTAINING YOU,
ALSO BEAR THE SEEDS OF YOUR ULTIMATELY PAINFUL DESTRUCTION. YOU ARE YOUR OWN
WORST ENEMY ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA AND IT IS YOUR OWN BEHAVIOR THAT IS
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TERRIBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOU SUFFER
FROM AND SO TO EXPECT OTHERS, TO EXPECT THE BACTERIA IN YOUR GUT TO BE YOUR
TRUE FRIEND IS DELUDED.
People resist whatever is
presented to them:
The standard reaction of emotional stylish
people is to raise their resistance whenever they are faced with anything, eg
they reach a place, see something or something is said to them, and then
depending on circumstances they may reduce their resistance which is never
switched off totally but is idling in the background.
Even when a lustful man sees a pretty girl,
his lust stirred is actually accompanied by stirred resistance which is
automatic and the cause of the stress he must afterwards experience and takes
time to dissipate. This is because he never truly understands the pretty girl
he is seeing (when it is possible to understand the sight), he never truly
understands his false and dangerous stirred lust that may blind him to dangers,
to be conned.
WHETHER YOUR RESISTANCE IS RAISED WHENEVER
YOU MEET SOMETHING, ARE FACED WITH SOMETHING IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE REFUTED.
EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE DO NOT CORRECTLY
UNDERSTAND THINGS HAPPENING, THINGS SEEN OR SAID TO YOU, IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO
SO BY THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING AND IF YOU DO NOT, CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU
ARE FACED WITH, THIS IS A CAUSE FOR AROUSED RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS
THAT HARMS YOU, WILL ULTIMATELY KILL YOU.
I don’t resist and so I am
not stressed:
Nowadays I immediately understand what is
presented to me, what is said to me, I see true as true, false as false, mad as
mad, harmful as harmful and thus seeing correctly, my resistance is not stirred
and so I am not faced with stress, the result of prolonged built up resistance
that becomes jammed, hard to unwind.
IF A PERSON SEES CORRECTLY WHATEVER IS
PRESENTED TO HIM, SAID TO HIM, HE DOES NOT NEED TO RESIST BECAUSE HE KNOWS AND
THIS MEANS NO STRESS.
Your air conditioner has a
contract to kill you:
Your air conditioner has a contract to kill
you.
Your fan has a contract to kill you.
Your BMW has a contract to kill you.
If you dispute you may be right or a fool
heading for doom.
No matter how comfortable you feel with
your conditioner or fan blowing, blowing away the heat, the equation is
shifting and later if you are not careful you will be chilled to even dangerous
pneumonia getting levels. I usually use the first speed on my fan which I keep
remote but after a few hours I am aware that what was previously pleasant, the
fan blowing has become tedious even painful and this means the fan is beginning
to exert its death pall on me.
THE GOOD FOOD YOU EAT IS ALSO KILLING YOU
THAT YOU IGNORE TO YOUR SUFFERING AND DEATH LATER. THERE IS NO SUCH AS 100%
PURE FOOD THAT NEVER HARMS YOU, ALL FOOD HARMS ULTIMATELY. IN THE SAME WAY THE
AIR CONDN, FAN AND CAR YOU CHERISH ARE ALL KILLERS, WHAT IS INITIALLY PLEASING
CAN BECOME TEDIOUS AND DEADLY LATER.
AND SO THE WISE PERSON THUS UNDERSTANDING
TRULY WILL RESTRICT HIS CONTACT WITH HIS FOODS, FAN OR BMW AND HE WILL SEEK THE
WAY OUT OF THIS WORLD AS THERE IS A WAY OUT TO SAFETY, TO HEAVEN AND ETERNAL
LIFE WITHOUT SUFFERING AND DEATH.
IF YOUR FAN HAS A CONTRACT TO KILL YOU AND
YOU DON’T THINK SO THEN YOU WILL OPEN YOURSELF UNCONDITIONALLY TO THE FAN WHICH
WILL THEN DEGRADE AND ULTIMATELY CONTRIBUTE TO YOUR DEMISE.
Woody Allen calls abuse
allegations untrue and disgraceful:
The accusations are never disgraceful but
if they are true he is disgraceful and so it is mixture of lack of
understanding and guilty complex that may have led him to make this muddled
reaction.
THE ALLEGATIONS ARE EITHER TRUE AND ALLEN
IS DISGRACEFUL OR IT IS FALSE AND SLANDEROUS NOT FALSE AND DISGGRACEFUL AS HE
CONTENDS AND SO EITHER HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT HE SPEAKS OR HIS IS A
PRETENTIOUS MAN WHO FEELS DISGRACED BY THE ALLEGATIONS THAT MAY BE TRUE.
Stephen Hawking’s new black
hole theory
Whatever is true is never subject to
revisions, applies thousands of years ago as now, it is only what is not true
that is subject to revision and hence the black hole theory is false, not the
product of actual seeing but false thought processes.
IF BLACK HOLES ARE TRUE, EXIST, THEY CAN BE
SEEN AND KNOWN PRECISELY AND THIS TRUTH IS NEVER SUBJECT TO REVISIONS AND SO
THE BLACK HOLE THEORY IS BASED ON THOUGHT, A FALSE FABRICATION OF THE MIND THAT
FOOLISH MEN EMBRACE NOT REALIZING THEY ARE EMBRACING SUFFERING AND DEATH. EVEN
IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE ARE UNABLE TO SEE THE NATURE OF BLACK HOLES IF THEY
EXIST, HIGHER BEINGS, GOD AND THE BUDDHA CAN AND THEY CAN ENUNCIATE FOR YOU
THAT BLACK HOLES ARE SUCH AND SUCH AND IT IS NEVER SUBJECT TO REVISIONS OR
DISPUTE.
THUS IF THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH
SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE CAUSE OF INSOLUBLE STRESS,
RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, NECESSITATES A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE AND
CONSTANTLY ABUSES YOUR MEMORY SYSTEM, THIS IS NOT SUBJECT TO REVISION OR
DISPUTE.
The truth is never Hawking’s
theory:
The truth is never Hawking’s theory nor
does the truth belong to anybody and so if it is Hawking’s theory it is never
the truth except in your delusion it could be and is the truth.
A THEORY IS A VIEW OR OPINION AND WHATEVER
IS A VIEW IS NOT THE TRUTH AND SO LAPSING INTO FALSITIES, DIFFICULTIES,
SUFFERING AND EVEN ENDLESS DEATHS.
THE TRUTH DOES NOT BELONG TO ANYONE AND SO
IS NEVER HAWKING’S THEORY AND IF IT IS HAWKING’S THEORY IT IS NEVER THE TRUTH.
THAT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED
AND LOUDNESS LEADS TO INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS IS NOT MY THEORY BUT IT IS A
STATEMENT OF THE TRUTH AS SEEN BY ME.
IF YOU WISH TO ESCAPE DEATH AND SUFFERING
(AS IT ACTUALLY IS POSSIBLE EVEN IF YOU AND EVERYONE HERE DECLINE TO DO SO)
THEN YOU SHOULD AVOID THEORIES EITHER PROPOUNDED BY OTHERS OR YOURSELF,
EMBRACING THEORIES AND VIEWS IS LIKE DIPPING YOUR FOOT INTO SHIT THAT WILL
SWALLOW AND DROWN YOU IN SHIT.
How do you truly understand what is said?
If you do not understand what he says, it must stir resistance that leads to
stress and he has karma stirring resistance in others.
Failure is failure and it is trying to be
too clever or impressive to link delusions to failure. Whatever is a failure
can be clearly defined as such and such and intrinsically there is no link with
delusions. Delusions can lead to failure or disaster but that is another thing.
DELUSIONS OF FAILURE AND DELUSIONS LEADING
TO FAILURE ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS, THEY ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS EXCEPT IN MUDDLED
THINKING THAT IS THE WAY TO DISASTER. JUST BECAUSE A DELUSION LED TO FAILURE
DOES NOT MAKE IT A CASE OF ‘DELUSION OF FAILURE’.
WHATEVER IS TRUE (THE OPPOSITE OF DELUSION)
CANNOT LEAD TO FAILURE AND JUST BECAUSE TRUTH LEADS TO SUCCESS DOES NOT MAKE IT
‘THE TRUTH OF SUCCESS’. THIS IS CALLED JUMPING TO
UNWARRANTED CONCLUSIONS. STOP TRYING TO BE TOO CLEVER AND SPINNING
INTELLECTUAL WEBS AROUND YOURSELF THAT WILL CONFUSE, TORMENT AND FINALLY KILL
YOU AND YOU HAVE DEBT TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING FOR ENCOURAGING THE SAME IN
OTHERS.
The fallacies not delusions
of failure:
What Krugman was addressing were the
fallacies touted by Republicans that point to the failure of Obama-care not
delusions of failure.
ONE MUST NOT CONFUSE FALLACIES (LIES OR
FALSITIES SPOKEN WITHOUT KNOWING THEY ARE CORRECT) WITH DELUSIONS, THEY ARE
DIFFERENT THINGS.
KRUGMAN APPEARING TO BE DEBUNKING THE
ALLEGATIONS MADE BY REPUBLICANS REGARDING OBAMACARE’S FAILURE AND IF THIS IS
THE CASE, IT IS THE FALLACIES NOT DELUSIONS OF FAILURE.
The fallacies of Obamacare
failure:
One must be careful to speak the truth and
not confuse others in the name of trying to be too clever.
And so a responsible columnist, scrupulous
not to confuse his audience would ascribe an accurate title ‘the fallacies of
Obamacare failure’ rather than the sweeping ‘the delusions of failure’ or even
‘the fallacies of failure’.
WHEN CHOOSING A TITLE MANY STRIVE OR ARE
PROGRAMMED TO BE CRYPTIC, NONSPECIFIC OR GENERALIZED IN ORDER TO EXAGGERATE THE
TOPIC AT HAND. ‘FALLACIES ABOUT OBAMACARE’S FAILURE’ IS A MORE ACCURATE
DEPICTION THAT ‘THE DELUSIONS OF FAILURE’.
You must be specific:
Anyone who misleads or confuses others is
asking for karma.
If it is the failure of Obamacare you are
talking about then you are misleading others to speak of the delusions of
failure when it is not failure in general that is deluded but failure in the
instance of Obamacare that you are referring about.
THE DELUSIONS OF FAILURE GIVES THE FALSE
IMPRESSION THAT FAILURE IS ASSOCIATED WITH DELUSIONS WHEN IN THIS CASE IT IS
NOT FAILURE PER SE BUT FAILURE OF OBAMACARE THAT IS THE TOPIC AND IT IS NOT
DELUSIONS (EVEN IF SOME REPUBLICANS ASCRIBE TO THEM) BUT FALLACIES ALLEGED THAT
IS THE MATTER.
EVEN
THOUGH THEY SUFFER TO HOMICIDAL SUICIDAL LEVELS, MANY ARE INCAPABLE OF CARING
FOR THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, EVEN THOSE WHO ARE RELIGIOUS. WHAT YOU CALL CARE IS
ACTUALLY NOT CARE, IS POISON AND NOT REALLY CARE AND SO IT WOULD NOT REALLY
WORK, REALLY CARE FOR HOFFMAN. IF THIS WORLD IS INCAPABLE OF CARE FOR OTHERS
AND YOU THINK IT CAN THEN YOU DO NOT SEE TRULY.
If a person does not care for himself, is
hell bent on self-destruction then it does not matter, is a waste of time and
energy for others to care for him and many in this world even those who think
they are very good and congenitally incapable of caring for themselves and
others, will not quit harming themselves and others even when they are driven
to the edge of suicide.
If you think this is a world that cares, is
capable of caring then if it is wrong you are deluded.
If the care you see around is for show, is
never true or good but false and harmful then you are again deluded.
THERE IS TRUE CARE BUT IT IS SELDOM SEEN IN
THIS WORLD AND WHAT THE WORLD PERCEIVES AS CARE IS ACTUALLY USELESS, EFFETE AND
HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND SO YOU ARE DELUDED TALKING ABOUT CARE.
EVEN THOUGH PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD SUFFER TO
SUICIDAL HOMICIDAL LEVELS, EVEN WHEN THE PATH OUT OF SUFFERING AND INSANITY IS
SHOWN THEM, IT FALLS ON DEAF EARS SO IF YOU THINK PEOPLE CAN BE HELPED OUT OF
THEIR SUICIDAL PATHS YOU ARE DELUDED.
ONLY A FOOL OR DELUDED MAN WOULD POSE SUCH
AN USELESS QUESTION. BECAUSE IT IS USELESS AND YOU THINK IT IS USEFUL YOU ARE
HEADED FOR INSANITY.
EVEN THOUGH THEY SUFFER TO HOMICIDAL
SUICIDAL LEVELS, MANY ARE INCAPABLE OF CARING FOR THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, EVEN
THOSE WHO ARE RELIGIOUS. WHAT YOU CALL CARE IS ACTUALLY NOT CARE, IS POISON AND
NOT REALLY CARE AND SO IT WOULD NOT REALLY WORK, REALLY CARE FOR HOFFMAN. IF
THIS WORLD IS INCAPABLE OF CARE FOR OTHERS AND YOU THINK IT CAN THEN YOU DO NOT
SEE TRULY.
All care in this world is
hypocritical, false:
BEFORE
YOU CAN TRULY CARE FOR OTHERS YOU MUST FIRST STOP HURTING, HARMING &
KILLING OTHERS AND IF YOU HAVE STYLE YOU ARE A MURDERER AND YOU ARE DELUDED TO
THINK YOU ARE NEVERTHELESS CAPABLE OF CARING FOR OTHERS.
There is true care but it is not seen in
this world.
What is the point of care if it is not true
and so only if care is true does it matter?
This is a world where everyone is responsible
for the suffering and deaths of others, whose constant bombardment of force
prolonging, changing speed and loudness drive themselves and others up the wall
and so what kind of care are you talking about when you have a dagger in your
hand and you are constantly stabbing others with your dagger?
EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD HAS A DAGGER (FORCE
PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) THAT STABS OTHERS ALL THE TIME, DISHES
OUT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (AND LOTS MORE HARM) TO OTHERS AND SO
WHAT CARE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT WHEN YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SUFFERING AND
DEATHS OF OTHERS.
BEFORE YOU CAN TRULY CARE FOR OTHERS YOU
MUST FIRST STOP HURTING, HARMING & KILLING OTHERS AND IF YOU HAVE STYLE YOU
ARE A MURDERER AND YOU ARE DELUDED TO THINK YOU ARE NEVERTHELESS CAPABLE OF
CARING FOR OTHERS.
Central banks can only offer sticking plasters, yet
their power grows by the day
The
central bank mandate just keeps on growing; these latter day lords of finance
are progressively moving in where governments fear to tread
Bloomberg News
9:19PM GMT 03 Feb 2014
If not at this week’s meeting of the
European Central Bank’s governing council, then surely some time very soon;
with euroland’s headline rate of inflation falling to just 0.7pc, the US
economy showing signs of stalling anew, the Dow Jones correcting, and emerging
markets in fresh turmoil, even the ultra-orthodox Jens Weidmann, president of
the German Bundesbank, is finding it hard to resist pressure for ECB action to
head off what now seems to be a clear and present danger of a deflationary
eurozone.
A further cut in the benchmark
interest rate, a negative deposit rate, another bout of credit easing –
whatever route the ECB chooses seems to matter little so long as it is seen to
be doing something. Once upon a time, it was to economic reformers in the
political class that people looked for economic salvation; now in the absence
of effective government it is to the supposedly superhuman powers of central
bankers.
More or less everywhere, from
Britain to America and Japan, and from Nigeria to India and Europe, central
bankers have become the first, second, third and last line of defence for almost
every economic problem that arises.
In Japan, the central bank has been
ordered to print money until deflation is finally exorcised; Shinzo Abe’s
second and third arrows of economic rebirth – fiscal and structural reform –
are meanwhile fast running into the sand, leaving the promised return to decent
levels of nominal GDP growth entirely reliant on whatever further actions the
central bank can conjure up.
In America, they’ve had money
printing, credit easing and just about everything else the central bank armoury
has to offer, but are now finding it impossible to rid themselves of the
addiction.
Already Federal Reserve tapering has
prompted financial chaos in the developing world, while new data announced on
Monday suggest that easing back on the monetary accelerator is once again
causing the domestic economy to lose steam. Engage in quantitative easing, and
the economy grows; start to turn off the printing press and the economy slows
to stall speed.
In the end, central banks can offer
no more than sticking-plaster solutions, yet both the power and the expectation
vested in them grows by the day. In Britain, the Bank of England’s role has
been expanded to a point of virtual economic hegemony. No longer is the Bank
simply and only charged with controlling inflation; today it is responsible for
the credit cycle, too, and for regulating the banks.
When it comes to doing something
about the runaway housing market, it is the Bank that is expected to act, not
the Government, which is ever more happy to contract out. Lasting solutions –
root-and-branch planning reform and tax breaks to encourage more housebuilding
– are apparently too politically difficult to contemplate. Better let the Bank
of England impose credit controls instead.
Ever bolder in his policy
interventions, Mark Carney, the new Governor, has even waded into the debate
about Scottish independence.
The central bank mandate just keeps
on growing; these latter day lords of finance are progressively moving in where
governments fear to tread. The way things are going, the central bankers will
soon be setting tax and welfare policy as well.
I exaggerate, of course, but only a
little. In Europe, the ECB is already actively involved in pushing through
structural and fiscal reform, through troika interventions in programme
countries. It’s not just monetary sovereignty that countries ceded when they
joined the euro; increasingly, it is fiscal and supply-side decision-making,
too.
Such interventions have been taken
to a whole new level by Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, governor of the Central Bank of
Nigeria. He is of the view that banks won’t lend until the economy is fixed,
and has therefore become fully engaged in removing government obstacles to
economic growth, and in driving specific supply-side reform, including, at
considerable personal risk, a crackdown on corruption.
I’m not saying that all this is
necessarily a bad thing. If governments can’t or won’t act, it is perhaps
better that central banks do it instead.
It is perhaps no coincidence that
Britain’s recent growth spurt coincides with the expansion of the Bank of
England’s new powers and the arrival of a highly interventionist new Governor.
His brief was to bring the Government some growth, and he’s delivering.
Yet there are also big dangers in abdicating
the levers of economic management to unelected economic technocrats. The most
obvious of these is that central banks often get it wrong, sometimes
spectacularly so. The root causes of the financial crisis were many and varied,
but inappropriately loose monetary policy is surely high up there among them.
In supporting demand and employment
ahead of the crisis, central bankers ignored the consequent credit and asset
bubbles their policies were creating. Even the central banks that supposedly
had the tools to counter these adverse effects were not notably successful in
using them.
In the early stages of the crisis,
for instance, the Bank of Spain boasted that Spanish banks would be fine
because of its own, unique system of “counter-cyclical” capital requirements
that protected against credit and real estate bubbles. Many of us actually fell
for this tosh. Eventually, Spanish banks went bust as spectacularly as
everywhere else. The Bank of Spain had hugely underestimated the size of the
problem. Central bankers failed to predict virtually all the big financial
crises of the past; there is little reason to believe they will today be any
better at it.
My worry is that central banks have
become a fig leaf for the politicians, providing suspect wisdom and comfort in
policies which at best offer only temporary relief.
No one would deny that the monetary
response to the panic of the Lehman’s collapse was infinitely better than in
the not dissimilar banking crisis of the early 1930s. As a result, we had a much
better outcome from what potentially could have been a much more destructive
event.
However, that economies are still
highly reliant on these policies more than five years after the event, and that
they can’t seem to unwind them without mishap, is deeply troubling.
We already know from bitter
experience that prolonged periods of ultra-low interest rates greatly increase
the propensity to financial instability and therefore economic crisis. They
also have some very unfortunate distributional consequences; the asset rich are
favoured over the asset poor, borrowers gain at the expense of savers, and
younger generations lose out to older ones.
The ECB may succeed in staving off
deflation, for the eurozone as a whole if not the already deflating economies of
the periphery. As for the latter, we are apparently not to worry; according to
the ECB, they are not in deflation, but only a “relative price adjustment”.
Believe it if you will.
The Bank of England may also succeed
in taking the heat out of the housing market, but if restricting credit deters
housebuilding, only at the expense of further exacerbating the supply-side
problem.
Central banks are a false god; they
can buy time, but they cannot magic away underlying afflictions.
Mankind’s deluded answer to
the economic crisis:
Globally there is a financial and economic
crisis that is critical, dangerous, life threatening and what is mankind’s
answer?
You do not need supernatural powers to know
what mankind’s answer and treatment is of the financial and economic crisis
that is actually getting worse.
The answer is to print more money because
the debt in the system far exceeds the money in the system, the wealth of the
system is far short of the debts of the system. And this money printing is not
for the masses but to bail out bondholders or the rich who hold these bonds,
the masses assuming their debts that further impoverishes and increases the
debt of the masses in favour of rich bondholders.
THIS IS NEVER A TRUE ANSWER TO THE CRISIS
BUT IT MERELY DELAYS OR POSTPONES RECKONING WITH DEBT. TO RESOLVE THE CRISIS
THERE MUST BE BITTER MEDICINE, MANY HAVE TO BE FORCED TO TAKE OR REALIZE
LOSSES. IN TRUTH MANY WHO THINK THEY ARE RICH HAVE BEEN WIPED OUT, THEIR MONEY
LOST OR STOLEN BY IRRESPONSIBLE BANKERS WHO ARE STILL WORSHIPPED AS THE GODS OF
FINANCE.
Both cynical and deluded
about care:
There is such a thing called care (and it
is a key to heaven) but what people call care is actually a parody or imitation
of care, rather than good it is actually bad for self and the recipient and the
fact that you disagree reflects dense delusion and defiance.
What people call care in this world is
pretence, ritualized for show, going through the motion standardized acts (eg
act concerned, act sad, hurt by your hurt, dramatic demonstration of emotion
accompanying acts of assistance that is ultimately futile self-defeating even
if it temporarily staves off death or suffering).
Because there are social expectations of
showing care (or they are paid to care eg nurses and doctors), many are
cynically discharging their obligations according to social norms whilst others
are thoroughly deluded to perceive what they see as caring for others (eg
whispered tenderness, caressing the sick) when it is faked, does not work
caring. Further ordinary people are eunuchs of care, they are actually impotent
where caring is concerned, they do not know what care is even if they swear
they know and can care.
Before you care, first do others
no harm:
Before you care, first do others no harm,
if you are harming others (something that is objective, cannot be refuted), it
renders you incapable of ever truly caring for others except in your delusion
you can and do care nevertheless.
The eager and anxious, emotional and
dramatic way you show your care harms yourself and others, the constant style
you possess harms others (and yourself) with stress, restlessness and
distraction, your rehashing whatever you say or do makes you a mechanical robot
incapable of truly caring for yourself let alone others and so if you are
harming yourself and others it renders you incapable, an eunuch of true caring
for others.
Keeping alive traditions:
If something is true, meaningful and good
it does not need keeping alive, it will be alive because it is true and good
and necessary and so if traditions require keeping alive they are false and
lead to insanity that you disbelieve to your own grief later when you become
insane.
A tradition is a plan of behaviour or
practice that must be remembered and carried out or practiced approximately or
precisely in which they are all robots of the tradition and that is faith in
and practice of rituals that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to
future woe.
A TRADITION IS A PLAN OF PRACTICE
ASSOCIATED WITH A GROUP OF PEOPLE/RACE THAT IS REMEMBERED AND CARRIED OUT
PERIODICALLY AND SO IT IS A RITUAL THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS THE PRACTICE TO
FUTURE WOE. I SUBSCRIBE TO NO TRADITIONS AND IF YOU DO AND WORSHIP TRADITIONS
YOU MAY BE ASKING FOR INSANITY AND SUFFERING LATER. TRADITIONS ARE MAD AND IT REFLECTS
DELUSION YOU THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND MEANINGFUL.
Truth never requires keeping
alive nor is it any use:
Truth never requires keeping alive nor is
it any use keeping alive because what is kept alive is no longer the truth but
figurehead truth. Instead truth needs to be seen and understood and once seen
and understood, because truth is as the Buddha said, the highest of tastes, the
path to deliverance and bliss, the person will always abide by the truth and he
does not need to keep alive the truth.
Only what is false and harmful need keeping
alive, needs remembering, conditioning and practicing or enforcing to keep it
alive because falsity and harmfulness has no veracity or correctness that does
not require sustenance.
Anyone who kills the truth, rejects the
truth, deny the truth is embracing insanity, suffering and death and he is a
fool and nothing can be done for him and it is to his great loss and suffering,
not anyone else loss.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, TRUTH IS NOT EASILY
SEEN, ORDINARY PEOPLE DO NOT SEE THE TRUTH AND TRUTH IS THE HIGHEST OF TASTES
AND SO ANYONE WHO KILLS TRUTH IS A FOOL EMBRACING INSANITY, SUFFERING AND
ENDLESS DEATH.
YOU EITHER SEE THE TRUTH OR YOU DON’T AND
IF YOU DON’T SEE THE TRUTH WHAT IS THERE TO KEEP ALIVE AND IF YOU EFFORTLESSLY
ALWAYS SEE THE TRUTH, WHAT IS THERE TO KEEP ALIVE EXCEPT IF YOU ARE MAD?
It is never a matter of the queen meeting
the pope in Rome but what is useful and beneficial is undertaken. If it is a
matter of courtesy, symbolic, for political or any false purposes then it is
controlled insanity on all sides involved and those who do not what to make of
it or applaud it.
WHENEVER PEOPLE MEET, THEY SHOULD HAVE TRUE
OR MEANINGFUL PURPOSES, IF IT IS FOR CONVIVIALITY, COURTESY OR WHATEVER FALSE
REASONS THEN IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN UNCONTROLLED INSANITY FOR
THOSE WHO ARE SOMNOLENT PARTICIPANTS.
EXACTLY WHAT ARE THE PURPOSES AND
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE MEETING CAN BE DETERMINED OBJECTIVELY AND IF THEY ARE FALSE
OR FRIVOLOUS THEN IT IS NEVER HARMLESS BUT HARMFUL TO THOSE WHO SEE NOTHING
WRONG. A LOT OF MONEY IS EXPENDED, TIME AND ENERGY AND STRESS INVOLVED SO YOU
BETTER MAKE SURE THE MEETING HAS TRUE PURPOSES OR IS NECESSARY.
Unhappiness is never a joy to watch except
if you are a pervert who derive pleasure at the misery of others and this has
deadly repercussions for you in terms of future suffering that you ignore to
your own bitter regret later.
WAIT UNTIL KARMA MAKE YOU REALLY UNHAPPY
AND LET’S SEE IF IT IS A JOY TO WATCH. THE ACTOR MAY ALSO BE PAYING THE PAINFUL
PRICE OF PARODYING UNHAPPINESS AS FUN.
TELLING OTHERS WHAT IS FALSE AND EVIL IS
TRUE HAS KARMA AND SO THE PERSON IS HEAPING KARMA TO BE REPAID AS SUFFERING
RATHER THAN CLEVER OR CUTE AS HE THINKS HE IS.
What I call happiness you
have never tasted:
The Buddha: "What others call happiness that
the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering that the
Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand
the Dhamma! For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those
who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as
obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the
witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.
Whatever you call happiness I have found is
suffering, I have been there before.
What I call happiness you and everyone here
have never tasted and it is the way to eternal life without suffering.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE AN EMOTIONAL PERSON WITH
STYLE, WITH CONSTANT PROLONGING, ACCELERATION OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS CAN TASTE
THE STRESS FREE, RESTLESSNESS FREE, DISTRACTION FREE HAPPINESS OF THE PERSON
WHO IS NOT A ROBOT, A MASTER SPECIFICALLY COMPOSING EVERY SPEECH AND ACTION HE
UNDERTAKES.
BECAUSE ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN OBJECTIVELY
BE FOUND TO HAVE STYLE, TO STRETCH THEIR SYLLABLES, ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND
LOUDNESS THEY HAVE NEVER TASTED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND THAT IS
INCOMPARABLE HAPPINESS HERE AND LEADS TO HEAVENLY BLISS THAT LASTS AN ETERNITY.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE WHO CONSTANTLY
THINK TO TASTE THE HAPPINESS OF THE MAN WHOSE THOUGHTS HAVE BEEN STILLED AND IT
IS AN EVEN HIGHER BLISS THAN THE MAN WITHOUT STYLE.
Guan Eng: Nothing wrong with Kok's CNY video
Jesus said you will be judged for every
careless word you say and if what you say is objectively false, you are
speaking foolishly incurring karma.
It is actually unnecessary to make CNY
videos which are made for false, calculated self serving reasons (eg to bond
with followers) and if it satirical or poking fun ‘in a friendly way’ then that
too has karma not nothing wrong.
KOK’S CNY VIDEO IS NEVER BLAMELESS.
IF IT IS ACTUALLY UNNECESSARY THEN THAT TOO
IS WRONG.
IF IT WAS SATIRICAL, POKING FUN AT OTHERS
THAT TOO IS BLAMEWORTHY NOT OK.
AND SO LIM GUAN ENG IS SPEAKING EMOTIONALLY
IN DELUSION TO DEFEND HIS COLLEAGUE WHO IS FOOLISHLY ASKING FOR TROUBLE MAKING
THE UNNECESSARY VIDEO.
You have not even scratched
the surface of happiness:
The Buddha said what you call happiness is
suffering and so you have not tasted and known happiness because what you call
happiness is also suffering.
And true happiness which exists, goes far
deeper and higher than your ever imagined possible, that I can vouch because
when I dwell in the higher states of mind my suffering melt away and it is
lovely.
THE BUDHHA, WHO KNOWS EVERYTHING, SAYS WHAT
YOU CALL HAPPINESS IS ACTUALLY SUFFERING AND SO YOU HAVE NEVER KNOWN HAPPINESS
EVEN THOUGH IT EXISTS AND GOES FAR DEEPER AND HIGHER THAN YOU EVER IMAGINE
MIGHT BE POSSIBLE. THIS I CAN VOUCH FROM EXPERIENCE.
Very few things need to be
said or done:
Few are the things that need to be said or
done and so all those who like to talk a lot, who like to do a lot are
practicing controlled insanity that ends in uncontrollable insanity.
IDLE CHATTER CAN SEND YOU TO HELL OR THE
ANIMAL WOMB THE BUDDHA SAID AND THOSE WHO LIKE TO TALK A LOT OR DO A LOT, FOR
GREEDY PURPOSES HAVE APPOINTMENTS WITH INSANITY AND ARE HEADING FOR ETERNAL WOE
BECAUSE CHATTERBOXES ARE NOT WELCOME IN HEAVEN.
IF EVERYONE ONLY SAID OR DID WHAT WAS
ESSENTIAL, THIS WORLD WILL BE A MUCH QUIETER, PEACEFUL AND LESS BUSY PLACE AND
A LOT OF THE TALK AND DOING ARE INSANE, TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL TO SELF
AND OTHERS.
Philip Seymour Hoffmann and the middle-aged drug
epidemic
By Mike
Males
February 4,
2014
When something happens emotional deluded people
try to make sense of it, try to rationalize, explain and being creatures of
thought that is false and evil they think is good and true, they start to
theorize, to extrapolate and explain the death as part of a trend as if to
sanitize or partially exculpate the responsibility of the deceased person. It
matters little or nothing if the death is part of a trend or not, if anything
it reflects the sickness of society as a whole and the sickness of individuals
who behind the veneer of success and happiness are insecure, suffering that
they need to turn to drugs to sustain them.
SUCH DISCUSSIONS ARE DELUDED, BESIDE THE
POINT AND EXPOSES THE TENDENCY OF HUMAN TO DETRACT AND FIND EXCUSES AND FALSE
REASONS FOR WHAT HAS HAPPENED.
IT IS RUBBISH, CRAP AND IF YOU DO NOT KNOW
WHAT TO MAKE OF SUCH SPUNNED YARNS, YOU ACCEPT IT, THEN RESISTANCE MUST BE
AROUSED THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
Heroin a mode of
self-destruction of sick individuals spawned by a sick society:
Heroin is merely a preferred snobbish mode
of self destruction of sick individuals spawned by a sick society. As long as
society remains sick (mad, meaningless, pretentious) it will drive individuals
to seek escapes that are potentially fatal, addictive and can get out of hand.
And so the matter is never Philip Seymour Hoffmann and the
middle-aged drug epidemic but it is about individuals no matter how
successful and famous whose lives are pretentious, a front, meaningless, mind
warping and stressful who must seek means of escape to try in vain to drown out
their suffering and inner demons and such escapes are fraught with even fatal
dangers and sometimes they lose control and go one step too far and get
themselves killed or it is willful fulfilment of a death wish.
As long as society remain
sick, as long as it continues to spawn seriously sick individuals, it is to be
expected such suicides or ‘accidental’ overdoses will occur and Hoffman is
merely a statistic on the wayside in which society is to be blamed and he is to
be blamed and it is useless and hypocritical, delusional to try to rationalize
such events.
No comments:
Post a Comment