Woody
Allen's adopted son, Moses, defends the filmmaker over claims he sexually
abused his adopted daughter in 1992.
He is speaking falsely
confusing the issue and so there is karma to be repaid as suffering.
Was he present when the
alleged incident took place? Did he stick like a shadow to his father such that
he is a reliable witness the claim was false?
Without knowing the claim
was false, you are not entitled to speak (driven by emotion never reason) in
support of your father and he is asking for suffering in repayment. Do not
confuse others with statements that are not based on facts.
UNLESS YOU THINK HE WITNESSED THE INCIDENT
OR HE IS A 24 HOUR BODYGUARD TO HIS FATHER, WHAT HE SAYS IS ALWAYS FALSE,
MISLEADING AND ASKING FOR UNNECESSARY SUFFERING IN REPAYMENT.
6 February
2014
PUTRAJAYA:
There will be no toll rate increase this year. The Government, which decided
against the move, will pay RM400mil in compensation to the toll
concessionaires, said Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.
If the government is paying $400 million
compensation it means there is a toll increase on behalf of the people and if
you think the government is generous, kind to do so you have serious false
perception.
RATHER THAN THE FALSE PERCEPTION IT IS GOOD
(NO TOLL INCREASE) AND GOOD (GOVERNMENT IS PICKING UP THE TAB) IT IS ACTUALLY
BAD (THERE IS A TOLL INCREASE) AND BAD (THE PEOPLE INDIRECTLY THROUGH
GOVERNMENT IS PAYING HIGHER TOLL).
Anwar: If Chong Wei contests, I'd give up...
This is a foolish statement to make driven
by emotion never true understanding and it has suffering due. It is a form of
mocking either Chong Wei or those behind him, BN.
Why should you give up? Chong Wei contesting
is not a valid reason for giving up and so you are acting foolishly that has
consequences in future suffering. Anyone who mocks others is asking for
suffering.
YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF IN FALSE
(EMOTIONAL) LOGIC THAT IS DANGEROUS BY GIVING UP IF CHONG WEI CONTESTS.
Happy Lunar New Year!
True happiness can never be transmitted to
others by mere greetings and so the happy lunar new year you transmit by
greeting is never true, it is merely lip service and trying to stir the
recipient’s mental force (always suffering never happy except in delusion) to
be pleased or excited.
TRUE HAPPINESS EXISTS BUT IT CANNOT BE
GOTTEN BY MERE GREETING. GREETINGS ARE CONVEYED WITH STYLE, WITH FORCE
PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS INTENDED TO STIR THE RECIPIENT’S
MENTAL FORCE TO BE PLEASED AND IMPRESSED AND THIS STIRRED MENTAL FORCE IS
ACTUALLY SUFFERING, ACCOMPANIED BY RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND THAT IS
NOT VERY HAPPY.
YOU MAY NOT AGREE BUT YOUR HAPPY NEW YEAR
IS LIKELY TO LEAD TO KARMA THAN MERIT, IT BONDS THE RECIPIENT TO THIS WORLD AND
SUFFERING.
Wendy Deng is a venal woman attracted to
the body or physical attributes of Tony Blair not his soul or being. Such a
person is heading for perdition and she is being adulterous, unfaithful to her
husband.
WENDY DENG IS NOT INTERESTED IN THE PERSON,
ONLY HIS BODY, POWER AND WEALTH. SUCH A PERSON IS ALWAYS DELUDED AND TROUBLE
WHO WILL PULL DOWN TO HELL WHOEVER ASSOCIATES WITH HER.
What to do if your Window 8
turns blank:
Last night, as a result of a botched update
of the Classic Shell Windows Start button, I ended up with a blank screen and
movable mouse cursor and nothing else every time I started my computer. After
much trying and searching the internet for answers I finally recovered my
computer.
I tried the old trick of pressing
control-alt-delete and got a screen with power button and switch user which
wasn’t of any use.
Next day at my office I searched the
internet for answers and there were many and confusing solutions, Microsoft’s
site was quite bad.
In order to recover/repair Windows I must
access advanced start up options and with the Spartan screen available to me,
my only option was press shift whilst I chose ‘restart’ option and this would
cause Windows to restart and go to the advance options where I could repair and
recover the OS and it worked somehow even though my recovery failed because of
some fault, the subsequently repair done ended up with a normal screen.
IN AN EMERGENCY WITH A BLANK SCREEN, IT
SEEMS ONLY THE CONTROL-ALT-DELETE SEQUENCE WOULD BRING UP A BASIC MENU THAT
INCLUDED THE POWER OPTIONS (SHUTDOWN, RESTART) AND FROM HERE IF YOU PRESS
‘SHIFT’ WHILST YOU CHOOSE THE RESTART OPTION, WINDOWS WILL RESTART TO THE
ADVANCED START UP OPTIONS FROM WHERE YOU CAN RECOVER YOUR SYSTEM.
Microsoft’s hopeless help:
It would be false and wrong to say
Microsoft’s help is hopeless but it is poor and inept. Microsoft has a site to
address the (fairly common) problem of Windows 8 booting to a blank screen with
a useless mouse pointer but it is almost useless, barking up the wrong tree
with wordy dissertations of irrelevant matters. They try to go through the
possibilities of what might be wrong and suggest you refer to certain articles
and even download a patch to install but how are you going to install a patch
on a Windows machine that is a blank? At the end there was the usual question,
‘Was it helpful?’
A Windows 8 machine that starts to a blank
screen is critical and being responsible for the OS, Microsoft should know what
is wrong and go straight to the heart of the problem, namely access the
power/restart button by pressing ‘cntrl-alt-delete’ then pressing ‘shift’
whilst you restart to get to the ‘advanced start up options’ wherein you may
try various recovery, repair options.
A refresh or repair of Windows 8 may be
useful for other situations. Recently my office Windows 8 machine seem to take
many minutes to shut down, perhaps due to clutter build up that a refresh may
clear and today I tried that and it seems to shut down promptly afterwards.
Windows 8 no longer shutdown completely to
ensure a quick start and shutdown and so the settings are saved each time you
shut down and Windows 8 restart from the setting rather than BIOS but with many
cycles of start-shut, glitches may develop and build up causing Windows to
become ponderous, slow to shut down and start and this may be cleared by a
forced restart, by pressing ‘shift-restart’ to get to the advanced start up
options.
AS A RESULT OF INSTALL BOTCHES OR WHATEVER,
THERE ARE THOSE WHO END UP WITH A BLANK WINDOWS 8 SCREEN AND SURELY MICROSOFT
SHOULD KNOW THE IMMEDIATE TREATMENT.
IN THIS SITUATION WINDOWS IS UNRESPONSIVE
TO MANY USUAL COMMANDS BUT IT RESPONDS TO ‘CONTROL-ALT-DELETE’ TO PRESENT A
BASIC MENU THAT INCLUDES THE POWER OPTIONS AND THEREAFTER YOU NEED TO PRESS
‘SHIFT’ WHILST YOU RESTART THE COMPUTER WHICH WILL THEN BOOT TO ADVANCED
STARTUP OPTIONS FROM WHICH YOU CAN PLAY AROUND WITH VARIOUS OPTIONS TO REPAIR
OR RECOVER YOUR COMPUTER.
IF YOUR COMPUTER DOES NOT SEEM TO BE QUITE
HEALTY, IS SLUGGISH OR SHUTS TOO SLOWLY, A ‘SHIFT-RESTART’ MAY RESTORE ITS
HEALTH BY CLEARING DETRITUS THAT MAY HAVE BUILT UP BECAUSE WINDOWS 8 NO LONGER
COMPLETELY SHUTDOWN NOWADAYS.
First things first,
Microsoft does not understand:
When customers come to you with urgent
problems, if you understand the system you produced, you should treat the
problem with a ‘first things first’ approach and that means get access to the
power button by pressing ‘control-alt-delete’ then press ‘shift’ whilst you
restart to the advanced startup options and then to try to repair or refresh or
recover the computer.
If that does not work then the problem may
be elsewhere and you work from thereon.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO UNDERSTAND TO BE A
MICROSOFT ENGINEER, YOU NEED PROGRAMMING, TRAINING BUT UNDERSTANDING IS
INCOMPARABLY SUPERIOR TO BLIND TRAINING. IF YOU UNDERSTAND WINDOWS 8 (AS YOU
SHOULD BEING A MICROSOFT EXPERT) THEN YOU SHOULD KNOW IN THIS URGENT SITUATION
WHAT FIRST THINGS FIRST THE PERSON SHOULD UNDERTAKE RATHER THAN GIVE A
DISCOURSE ABOUT WHAT MIGHT POSSIBLY BE WRONG AND SUGGEST SOFTWARE PATCH
DOWNLOADS THAT ARE SILLY IN A BLANK UNRESPONSIVE COMPUTER.
Like suddenly going blind:
When your Windows 8 boots to a blank screen
with a mouse pointer that does nothing and the usual keyboard commands like
Win-X or Win-C not working, it can be alarming like the end of the world but it
is not, no need to get upset, as there are possible alternatives to communicate
with your ‘locked in’ computer that surely Microsoft support staff should know
and swiftly communicate with their troubled clients like telling them, ‘try
this, if it does not work, try that’.
And there are simple free treatments, just
press ‘control-alt-delete’ to get to power options and then press
‘shift-restart’ to get to the advanced start options.
IN TIMES OF NEED, MICROSOFT IS NOT SUCH A
HELPFUL FRIEND, IT BEATS AROUND THE BUSH AND DOES NOT KNOW ITS STUFF TO SHINE A
LIGHT FOR TROUBLED CUSTOMERS BY TELLING THEM THE THINGS TO DO FIRST.
This is a NYT headline. Pageantry and pride
means the Games opening is for show, to show off, devoid of true meaning and it
is not free but costs a lot of money that could be spent feeding impoverished
unemployed masses.
If you think pageantry has intrinsic
meaning then you are deluded. Pageants are 100% for show, to impress and stir
mental forces and because it is useless, only for show, those who organize and
participate, those who are attracted and find them meaningful are deluded,
heading for insanity and eternal suffering.
PAGEANTRY ARE NEVER ABOUT MEANING OR
SUBSTANCE, THEY ARE SIMPLE SPECTACLES, FOR SHOW, TO SHOW OFF, TO IMPRESS AND
STIR EXCITEMENT AND BECAUSE THEY ARE MEANINGLESS AND WASTEFUL ALL THOSE WHO
SUBSCRIBE ARE HEADED FOR TORMENT NOT SAFETY OR HAPPINESS.
Style is the cause of
eternal suffering and death:
I KNOW BY EXPERIENCE, FIRST HAND, THAT STYLE OR PROLONGING, CHANGING
SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE CAUSE OF A PERSON’S STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND
DISTRACTION, NECESSITATES A TERRIBLE ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE AND THE WAY TO
ETERNAL DEATHS AND CONSTANCY OF SPEED AND STRENGTH WITHOUT PROLONGING IS THE INCOMPARABLE
DELIGHTFUL PERMANENT RELEASE FROM TERRIBLE SUFFERING AND DEATH.
Even for me, until recently I too have been
prolonging, changing speed and loudness although not as floridly as ordinary
people and it is only recently, when my concentration has become sufficiently
high and stable that I am able (not always) to attain true constancy of speed
and strength without prolonging and then I taste the difference in release from
suffering, stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate that it brings and
it is never a choice for me, no style is lovely, happy, style is terrible,
tormenting, what is there to choose (unless you are insane).
A PERSON WHO HAS TRULY TASTED CONSTANCY OF
SPEED AND STRENGTH (LOUDNESS) WITHOUT PROLONGING HAS TASTED THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE
FROM CONTROLLED INSANITY, THE NOOSE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS, INABILITY TO
CONCENTRATE AND A ROBOTIC REHASHING EXISTENCE AND TO HIM, IT IS NOT A MATTER OF
CHOICE BETWEEN HAVING STYLE OR NO STYLE, YOU MUST BE MAD TO CHOOSE STYLE OVER
NO STYLE.
Style is eternal death &
suffering, no style is eternal life and happiness:
It is IMPOSSIBLE for ordinary people to
have tasted the happiness of constancy of speed and strength without
prolonging, which is an effortless release from suffering and death and once a
person has tasted constancy of speed and strength without prolonging (as I
truly now have), he will never revert to style because that would be to give up
true happiness and eternal life to embrace terrible suffering and endless
death.
I SAY CONSTANCY OF SPEED AND STRENGTH
WITHOUT PROLONGING IS THE INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING EVEN HERE AND IT
LEADS TO ETERNAL HEAVENLY LIFE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TRAPPED IN STYLE TO
EVEN APPROACH LET ALONE EQUAL OR SURPASS THE HAPPINESS OF THE PERSON WHO HAS REACHED
THE END OF STYLE AND IT IS A PERSON’S STYLE THAT IS HIS CURSE TO ETERNAL
SUFFERING AND DEATH.
Singapore’s three dangerous
bubbles:
Singapore's wealth bubble may pop
|
|
The
city-state has attracted foreign wealth, but economists warn of trouble if
tycoons were to pull out in the future.
MONEY,
plenty of it! So much is circulating around parts of Singapore – much of it
from abroad – that some economists are worried.
After years
of success luring in foreign wealth, the city is now experiencing what an
analyst calls a “wealth bubble” that is continuing to grow.
Noted global
economist Jesse Colombo warned that several bubbles were on the verge of
popping, threatening the city with an Iceland-style economic meltdown. He
predicted in Forbes that this could happen within years.
They exist
in property, Singaporean household debts and the bloated population of migrant
workers.
“Singapore (also)
has a wealth bubble,” added Colombo, who had earlier forecast America’s housing
bubble.
For years,
the republic had worked to attract high net-worth foreigners to its shores, a
strategy that is unlikely to end any time soon.
Prime
Minister Lee Hsien Loong said last year: “If I can get another 10 billionaires
to move to Singapore and set up their base here ... Singaporeans will be better
off...”
He indicated
this would be pursued even if it worsens the rich-poor inequality.
(In the last
10 years, the wages of the bottom 20% fell by 10% in real terms, while those
for the top one-fifth grew by some 30%.)
“I think
Singaporeans will be better off, because they (foreign investors) will bring in
business, bring in opportunities, open new doors and create new jobs,” Lee
said. “I think that is the attitude with which we must approach this problem.”
He’s
following in his father’s footsteps.
In the early
1980s, Lee Kuan Yew started to attract wealthy foreigners here to make up for a
shortage of land and natural resources.
Lee, now 90,
used to invite wealthy entrepreneurs, including a number of Hong Kong
billionaires, to witness the National Day parades as special guests – and gave
them permanent residency.
With low
taxes, minimal corruption, protective banking laws and the abolishing of estate
tax in 2008, his successors have succeeded in attracting more of them here.
Today,
Singapore has 27 billionaires, the fifth largest number in the world.
New arrivals
included US investor Jim Rogers, a Facebook co-founder Eduardo Saverin, New
Zealander Richard Chandler, Indian telecom tycoon Bhupendra Kumar Modi, several
Australians and Hong Kong movie stars.
One in 30
Singaporean residents is today a millionaire – doubling from 2008 to 2012. It
has the world’s highest number of millionaires per capita.
The
government appears to be unfazed by warnings of potential trouble if foreign
tycoons were to pull out one day.
China feels
differently. It started to curb the entry of hot money on concerns that capital
inflows pose a threat to China’s economy.
Not many
Singaporeans agree with their prime minister that having more billionaires
necessarily means more investment and jobs.
“Some do
invest here, but most simply park their money here and run their businesses
outside,” said a retired banker.
They drive
up the cost of living for locals, especially in real estate and cars, he added.
Colombo said
Singapore’s total wealth rose by 8.7% in the past year alone to reach an
average of US$282,000 (RM938,000) per adult.
The danger
is that when Singapore’s bubble pops, it would cause “wealth to decline
significantly”.
Lee Kuan Yew
School of Public Policy associate dean Donald Low expressed concern about
efforts to attract the super-rich here - even if they increase inequality.
“Relying on
inflow of foreign monies to finance real estate domestically is often a recipe
for financial disaster,” he told The Independent Singapore.
On
perspective, the influx of so much money has some impact on the upper class,
businessmen and property owners.
Generating
investment and jobs rests more with global investors than billionaires looking
for a safe place to park their money.
The Prime
Minister is right in predicting that if more were to arrive, it would widen the
economic gap between rich and poor Singaporeans.
Whatever
benefits they have brought here are being unequally distributed, observers say.
“While the
rich have fun, locals are struggling to keep up with the rising cost of
living,” a foreign TV journalist wrote.
Earlier,
under pressure from Europe, Singapore banks started to scrutinise foreign
account holders as stricter tax evasion measures kicked in.
This is to
decide whether to send high-risk clients packing, said one source. They include
wanted people accused of corruption elsewhere, criminals and drug traffickers.
Foreign
politicians have charged that, as banking secrecy is lifted in Switzerland,
some tax evaders are shifting their attention here.
Emotionally
struggling Singaporeans are no different from people elsewhere when they see
splurging wealth around them as they struggle to hold their jobs.
PM Lee’s
remarks, saying the presence of 10 foreign billionaires is more desirable than
levelling economic inequality, has hurt his popularity.
An
undergraduate asked incredulously: “I don’t believe he said it. Was he quoted
correctly?”
Adding to
his woes is the growing class divide in society.
The recent
misbehaviour of some wealthy residents – both foreigners and locals – in
flaunting their wealth or thumbing their noses at ordinary people is adding
public blame on his policies.
Law Minister
K. Shanmugam told the Financial Times that the rich-poor gap was very
obvious.
Recalling
how he was cut off while driving one evening, first by a Ferrari and then by a
Porsche, the minister added: “The middle class in Singapore has found costs
rising because of energy, food and so on.”
They find
themselves squeezed since they don’t get the government subsidies that the
poorest 20% gets, he added.
How come everyone here has
style when it is possible not to?
Every toad croaks with style, hops with
style.
There is not
even one toad that croaks without style, hops without style.
Every insect calls with style, moves with
style.
Every ballet dancer dances with style, with
constant prolonging, changing speed and strength of force, there is not even
one ballet dancer who dances without speed and force changes, without
prolonging.
How come everyone here has style even when
it is possible not to and it is the incomparable release from (controlled)
insanity, stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate and a rehashing
robotic existence?
STYLE IS THE REASON (AND NOT OTHERS) WHY
PEOPLE ARE TRAPPED IN THIS WORLD OF SUFFERING EVEN TO HOMICIDAL SUICIDAL LEVELS
AND THE SUCCESSFUL SHEDDING OF STYLE IS TO BE BORN AGAIN IN SPIRIT AND WATER TO
EXIT THIS WORLD TO ETERNAL LIFE AND HAPPINESS.
IF YOU THINK YOU DO NOT HAVE
STYLE, YOU DO NOT STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS, LET ME
DEMONSTRATE HOW YOUR SPEECH WOULD ACTUALLY SOUND WITHOUT INCESSANT SPEED AND
LOUDNESS CHANGES AND PROLONGING AND IT IS THIS STYLE THAT IS THE CURSE THAT
CONDEMNS YOU TO TERRIBLE SUFFERING HERE AND ETERNALLY.
Style is controlled
insanity:
Style is not insanity but it is controlled
insanity in many, not one way.
When a person uses force to prolong a
syllable he is delaying its completion and when he accelerates in speed and
loudness through that delayed syllable he is rushing and so the person of style
is doing two contradictory things at a time and that is insanity.
TO ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH
A SYLLABLE YOU STRETCHED OR DELAYED IS TO RUSH AND DELAY AT THE SAME TIME AND
THIS IS NOT MAD BUT CONTROLLED MADNESS, CONTROLLED CONFLICT IN THE NAME OF
STYLE, IN THE NAME OF SHOWING OFF, IMPRESSING AND PLEASING OTHERS THAT WILL END
IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD CONFLICT.
CAUSING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DIVIDING
YOUR CONCENTRATION AND REHASHING TOO ARE CONTROLLED MADNESS DUE TO STYLE.
IT CANNOT BE DISPUTED STYLE IS CONTROLLED
INSANITY, AND SO BECAUSE EVERYONE HERE HAVE STYLE, THEY ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED
INSANITY ALL THE TIME AND DOOMED TO UNCONTROLLABLE INSANITY.
Special
investigation Australian
troops are scarred, scared and coming home to a new enemy that few are equipped
for.
It is an exercise in false logic and thence
false perception to jump to the logical conclusion the war follows a person
home when he is psychologically traumatised by the war. This is dangerous and
leads to suffering and you have debt for recommending the same to others.
Not anyone here do I envy:
I do not envy you, the rich, the powerful,
the famous, the young. Not even God or the Buddha do I envy.
Why is that true and so?
IN ORDER TO ENVY OR BE JEALOUS A PERSON’S
MENTAL FORCE MUST BE STIRRED TO LIKE OR DISLIKE AND IT IS SUFFERING NEVER
HAPPY, MAD OR MEANINGLESS RATHER THAN SANE AND MEANINGFUL AND SO BECAUSE MY
MIND HAS REACHED A HIGH CONCENTRATION NOT TO BE STIRRED BY OTHERS, I CANNOT ENVY
OR BE JEALOUS OF ANYONE NOR IS IT ANY MEANING OR HAPPINESS TO DO SO BUT IT IS
MEANINGLESS AND SUFFERING TO ENVY AND BE JEALOUS.
Of course I did not molest
Dylan:
The
78-year-old filmmaker wrote in the New York Times: "Of course, I did not
molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been
cheated out of having a loving father."
There is nothing of course or not of course
about molesting Dylan and so he is speaking emotionally, insistently that
betrays he is not an objective or reliable witness and so he may not be telling
the truth. He is definitely speaking falsely, but for what reason? You don’t
speak falsely out of innocence but out of guilt.
If he did not molest her and being an
emotional man, he would be angry, furious and if he is not, then it is a
suggestion he is suspect.
An ability and inability:
Not to stretch syllables, change speed and
loudness is an ability of beings whose
concentration has reached a sufficient elevation and it is inability of the
vast majority of beings trapped here.
In the same way to fully conscious not
think is an ability of some beings with higher concentration and it is an
inability of beings of the vast majority with low concentration.
Not to stir one’s mental force to like or
dislike is an ability of some beings with high concentration and an inability
of the vast majority here with low concentration.
TO STRETCH OR NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES IS NOT
A MATTER OF CHOICE BUT ABILITY. THOSE WITH SUFFICIENT HIGH CONCENTRATION ARE
ABLE NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, THOSE OF ORDINARY CONCENTRATION ARE UNABLE TO
NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES.
Why is Mia Farrow vindictive
to Woody Allen?
If it is true Mia is vindictive to Allen,
it must have been some wrong Woody did to her and so he too is guilty of wrong.
If Woody was truly blameless in his conduct
to Mia, it is impossible she would want revenge.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE WOODY IS BLAMELESS IN HIS
CONDUCT AND IF MIA WANTS REVENGE IT MEANS HE MUST HAVE CROSSED HER AND HE TOO
IS TO BE BLAMED AND HE SHOULD REVEAL WHAT HE DID THAT MADE MIA WANT REVENGE.
This is a common copied way of speaking, he
is referring to something but it is never the circus is in town but he is
speaking sarcastically, falsely about the event.
The Buddha said the wise are not entangled
and so he would not bother about the event much less refer disparagingly to it
as the circus is in town. If you speak like this, you are incurring debt to be
repaid as totally unnecessary future suffering. If you enjoy suffering, go
ahead and speak thus but when suffering engulfs you in the future you will
weep.
NEVER BE SARCASTIC, NEVER DISPARAGE OTHERS
UNLESS YOU WANT TO SUFFER IN REPAYMENT IN THE FUTURE.
Truly not sarcastic:
Sarcasm comes from an urge to defile or
harm or attack others in a disguised indirect manner.
Even if you and everyone here cannot or
refuse to erase your ill will which is the father of sarcasm, it is possible to
do so and so a person (like me) who has successfully erased his urge to harm or
attack others, who derive no pleasure in deprecating others, who has killed his
pride and self identity, he is truly not sarcastic.
As long as the urge to mock or deride
others remain, you can exercise restraint, you can use force to arrest your
urge but it is controlling and what is subject to control is subject to loss of
control and an outbreak of sarcasm and you are not truly not sarcastic and in
danger of relapsing and suffering.
Going about
the daily business of life for 40 years.
He is speaking falsely and asking you to do
what is impossible and so if you do not truly understand what he is proposing
you must stir resistance that leads to stress. Only the person who knows he is
deluded and does not accept will not be poisoned.
Something is either true or false, never
serious or not serious. You don’t take or treat something (economics) seriously
not seriously but you understand whatever is proposed as correct or wrong.
In order for a person to treat something
seriously, he must stir his mental force and act according to programming to be
careful and obsessive about that thing, if he dismisses something, he stirs his
mental force according to a program to ignore, downplay and treat it lightly,
both of which are actually false and unnecessary and suffering.
YOU NEVER TREAT ANYTHING SERIOUSLY OR
LIGHTLY WHICH ARE MATTERS OF STIRRED FORCE AND PROGRAMMING BUT YOU EXAMINE
SOMETHING AS TRUE OR FALSE AND ACT OR NOT ACT ACCORDINGLY.
DON’T TAKE ECONOMICS TOO SERIOUSLY IMPLIES
ECONOMICS IS FALLIBLE NOT ABSOLUTELY CORRECT AND THAT IS WRONG VIEW. EITHER
ECONOMICS IS CORRECT OR INCORRECT, IF IT IS INCORRECT YOU DO NOT ACCEPT IT, NOT
DON’T TREAT IT TOO SERIOUSLY WHICH IS MAD.
A PERSON OF TRUE UNDERSTANDING NEVER
ADVICES ANOTHER NOT TO TAKE SOMETHING SERIOUSLY, HE TELLS OTHERS SOMETHING IS
FALSE AND HARMFUL AND THUS TO BE REJECTED.
Treating something seriously
or lightly is an attitude:
Treating something seriously or lightly is
actually an attitude and only robots have attitude and subscribe to attitudes,
those with true understanding never have attitudes to anything.
Treating something (eg sex, boys, girls)
seriously or lightly is a blind, indiscriminate instruction that the recipient
either accepts or rejects and if he accepts, he endeavours to program himself,
train himself to behave accordingly and treat sex either seriously or
frivolously.
To those with true understanding, it is
never a matter of having an attitude to anything but is what you are doing
right or wrong, harmful or beneficial, meaningful or meaningless, what has
seriously or lightly got to do with it?
TREATING SOMETHING SERIOUSLY OR NOT IS AN
ATTITUDE AND ATTITUDES ARE ALWAYS FALSE, EVIL AND SUFFERING.
He should know what he did and so if he
thought he was going to prison it means he is guilty and the jury has made a
wrong judgement and there will be karma for those who wrongly discharged a
guilty man.
PEOPLE DO NOT REALIZE THE IMPLICATIONS OF
WHAT THEY SAY. IF YOU THOUGHT YOU ARE GUILTY THEN YOU MUST BE GUILTY AND THE
JURORS ‘MADE A MISTAKE’ AND THERE WILL BE ACCOUNTING FOR MAKING ‘MISTAKES’.
Cleared Corrie star Bill Roache facing fresh anguish
as more women make new sex assault allegations
This is evidence that buttresses his own
belief he is guilty.
It is an offence to tell
others to take it easy or seriously:
It is an offence (with karma due to be
experienced as future suffering) to tell others to take it easy or take it
seriously because it is false, bad and mad advice not good that you perceive in
delusion.
If you truly understand a matter you want
to pursue, whether it is necessary or unnecessary, meaningful or meaningless,
beneficial or harmful, true or false, what is there to take it easy or
seriously but that you do what is right, meaningful and true and avoid what is
wrong, meaningless and false.
It is only if you do not understand what
you are doing and nevertheless want to partake, you do not know whether it (eg
jogging) works or not, that you have to take it easy or seriously.
Taking easy or seriously is subjective,
vague and false. How much seriousness is taking it seriously and how much
seriousness is taking it easy? 50%, 70% or 100%?
Taking it easy or seriously is a style or
plan of how to undertake something that is general, nonspecific, can be applied
to a wide range of situations and so it is robotic programming and whoever
seeks to program others by telling them to take it easy or seriously is
undertaking karma or debt to be repaid as suffering.
AND SO THE PERSON WHO TELLS OTHERS TO TAKE
IT EASY OR SERIOUSLY MIGHT THINK HE IS GIVING GOOD ADVICE BUT HE IS DELUDED,
PUTTING A NOOSE AROUND HIS NECK TELLING OTHERS WHAT IS MEANINGLESS, FALSE AND
SUFFERING.
IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING MEANINGFUL OR GOOD TO
DO, YOU SHOULD NOT TAKE IT EASY OR SERIOUSLY BUT YOU SHOULD UNDERTAKE IT
MINDFULLY, ATTENTIVELY, FULLY COMPREHENDING NOT SERIOUSLY.
If what I say is correct, how come no one
here has this view? The reason why no one here can have such view is because
you need great wisdom, great discernment to say it and unless you have great
concentration (the higher states of the mind, namely no thinking, no like or
dislike) which requires you to have high virtue (high good conduct and speech)
you cannot say it.
The Buddha: "Such
and such is virtue; concentration; and wisdom. Great becomes the fruit, great
is the gain of concentration when fully developed by virtuous conduct; great becomes
the fruit& gain of wisdom when it is fully developed by concentration.
Utterly freed from lust, becoming, and ignorance is the mind that is fully
developed in wisdom."
Virtue, concentration and wisdom are
linked, before you can possess great wisdom and concentration you must first
have great virtue and ordinary people do not have great virtue which is why
their concentration is shallow and their wisdom poor.
There is only one correct
way of doing or saying:
Taking it easy or seriously is about how you
do something and that is style not substance and it is always false, evil.
There is only one correct way (not style)
of doing or saying something and that is to do or say it attentively, mindfully, fully comprehending. To
say or do something frivolously, indifferently, inattentively, angrily,
jovially or whatever is false and evil.
You want to exist in the
wrong way and that means eternal suffering and death:
There are two mutually exclusive ways of
existence, the correct and the wrong way and this is objective, cannot be
disputed by anyone in truth, only in falsity, in delusion.
And so because you want to exist and the
way you exist is entirely false, harmful to yourself and others who come into
contact with you, it means eternal suffering and eternal deaths. Only those who
exist in a correct way that does not harm themselves or others are heading for
eternal happiness and eternal life.
The Buddha and those who are enlightened do
not wish to exist anymore, they exist in the correct way so that they are debt
free and debt free they are released, not bonded to life and they make an end
to all existing, even in heaven the enlightened find no delight but danger.
Giraffe killed because of
inbreeding:
A young giraffe in a Denmark zoo was killed
because of in breeding and it reflects delusion of scientists on the
desirability of non-inbreeding that they undertake killing which incurs karma
for those responsible.
IF YOU WANT TO AVOID KARMA YOU SHOULD NOT
KILL AND CAUSE TO KILL. IT REFLECTS THE DENSE DELUSION OF SCIENTISTS WHO THINK
THEY ARE RIGHT THAT THEY THINK THEY SHOULD CULL IN THE NAME OF GENE DIVERSITY.
By serious is meant
greedily:
Stylish people are mixed up and
pretentious, they use nice words to disguise what they actually mean.
Often if not always, by taking it seriously
is meant taking it greedily or with material gains in mind and taking it easy
is meant with disinterest, with reduced greed.
Exactly what you mean by ‘serious’ can be
determined even if you and everyone here are clueless. By ‘serious’ is meant
with greed raised, with material gains or acquisition in mind.
Ayrton Senna’s greatest lap:
Senna was driving an uncompetitive car but
the rain allowed his driving ability to shine through by negating the
advantages of his rivals that included champion (the professor) Alain Prost and
upcoming Schumacher. In the opening lap he came from fifth to overtake the
great Prost in just one lap to lead the GP and continue until the end.
It was at Donington Park, England, and Senna was in a
slightly manic state, which we'll come to shortly.He was driving a McLaren with a ''customer'' Ford V8 that was considerably down on power compared with the works engines fitted to the Benetton-Fords, let alone the dominant Williams-Renaults.
Although the best qualifier of the modern era, on a dry track Senna could place the McLaren only fourth on the grid. With pole often decided by a few hundreds or even thousands of a second, he was a huge 1.65 seconds off the pace.
The Williams cars in the hands of Alain Prost and Damon Hill had comfortably locked out the front row. Beside Senna was Michael Schumacher in the Benetton, with Karl Wendlinger, in the new Mercedes-backed Sauber, right behind.
The only thing that could help Senna in the race was that great leveller, rain. And the rain came, in buckets.
Still, when the lights went green Senna's fourth soon became fifth. Schumacher had forced him right to the edge of the sodden track at the first corner, Redgate, allowing Wendlinger's Sauber to nail them both.
In the mist of spray, Senna jinked across the track and took Schumacher on the exit. It was in the next section, the Craner Curves, where things became slightly surreal.
At first, it looked like Senna had completely overshot things and was about to punch a hole in the scenery. He was on the very outside of the corner, on a spectacularly different line to everyone else.
Miraculously he kept it together, as if he alone was in the dry, and dispatched Wendlinger. The Brazilian rain master then set his sights on the Williams duo.
With an uncanny ability to find more grip than anyone else, he next nailed Hill on the inside of McLean's.
Prost had opened a minor break; Senna starting ripping into it. Three more corners down the road he slipped under the Frenchman's guard at the Melbourne hairpin and took the lead.
He'd gone from fifth to first in two-thirds of a lap. A lap later he was four seconds in front.
Still, at the time Senna was teetering on an emotional brink.
His wish to drive for the Williams team was blocked by Prost; he saw obstruction and conspiracy everywhere.
He toyed with racing in the US and even retirement. When Ron Dennis finally succeeded in securing his services at McLaren, Senna would agree only to a race-by-race contract.
Inside the car, however, he held his emotions in check and, on that day at Donington, he was supreme. He was touched by God.
He lapped everyone except Damon Hill en route to victory. And by the end of the race - the third of the season - he was comfortably leading the world championship.
Blank Screen may be Windows
8 quirk to be wary of:
I don’t remember suffering blank screens
with previous Windows computers and it is by no means unknown for Windows 8
users to suffer a blank screen (with usual shortcut keys dead) which is
particularly challenging to ordinary users without any computer ‘savvy’.
Whether by (poor) design or accident or
deliberate (for monetary purposes), this blank screen should borne in mind and
if you wish to save yourself a lot of trouble and expense getting it fixed,
remember something that nobody not even Microsoft tech site tells you, press
control-alt-delete to get the menu with the power options (sleep, restart,
shutdown) then press shift-restart to get windows to restart to the advanced
start up option to try to repair/recover/restore windows.
What happened to blue
screens of death in past:
Previously when Windows encountered fatal
problems you get a sudden blue screen of death that says Windows has to shut
down and when Windows is restarted, it automatically
led to a ‘safe-mode’ wherein you can try to solve the problem or
ignore the problem.
With Windows 8 it seems, when you have this
blank screen, virtually all the short cut keys are unresponsive (except control
alt delete) and whenever you restarted Windows it ended up with another blank
screen.
IN THE PAST WHEN WINDOWS EXPERIENCED FATAL
ERRORS IT SHOWED A BLANK SCREEN AND WHEN RESTARTED, WINDOWS BOOTED TO A SAFE
MODE FOR YOU TO TINKER. NOW WITH WINDOWS 8 YOU ARE LEFT IN LIMBO, EVERY TIME
YOU REBOOT IT CAME TO THE SAME BLANK UNRESPONSIVE SCREEN AND SO IF MICROSOFT
COULD PREVENT THIS, MICROSOFT IS DERELICT IN ITS RESPONSIBILITY IN ALLOWING
THIS STATE OF AFFAIRS TO EXIST.
A price you pay for a
sophisticated Windows 8 look?
Ending up paralyzed with a blank screen may
be the (considerable) price consumers pay for Microsoft to have an OS that
looks sophisticated, impressive. It is certainly not very sophisticated in the
past when Windows suddenly sprang a blue screen and the message a fatal error
has occurred and it had to shut down and so nowadays slick Windows 8 would
quietly end up with a blank screen from which you cannot elicit responses.
A LOT OF THINGS MICROSOFT CHANGES MAY NOT
BE IN THE NAME OF PROGRESS BUT TO LOOK MORE IMPRESSIVE EVEN TO THE DETRIMENT OF
RELIABILITY AND FUNCTIONALITY.
Style poisons and traps
everyone:
By style is meant the accompanying force
prolonging (syllables), changing speed and strength (loudness) in the words and
actions of a person.
It does not matter who you are, how you
swear by your style and others’ styles, it is music to your ears, style always
poisons everyone both insidiously and acutely and thus poisoned he experiences
rising stress, restlessness, inability to concentrate and surrenders himself
like the captivated cobra to the snake charmer’s tune and such is the
mesmerisation it is difficult almost impossible to extricate most and they are
led they do not realize into torment and the final slaughter, not just once but
even many eternities, shedding their own blood the Buddha said is as vast as an
ocean.
Only those who have reached the third
higher state of mind, neither like nor dislike, whose mental forces have been
stirred are immune to the mesmeric inducement by style to similarly resonate
with style.
WHETHER YOU ARE COGNIZANT OF THE PRESENCE
OF STYLE, PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH OR THAT OF OTHERS
OR NOT, NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY ADULATE IT, STYLE IS POISONOUS AND POISONS (WITH
STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE) ALL WHO COME INTO CONTACT
WITH IT, INDUCES AND MAINTAINS THEM IN STYLE LIKE A DUMB ROBOT AND IF THEY ARE
COMPLACENT, INDIFFERENT THEY WILL BE TORMENTED AND ULTIMATELY LED TO THEIR
SLAUGHTER, NOT JUST ONCE BUT EVEN COUNTLESS TIMES, ETERNALLY.
THE WISE PERSON, ALARMED, WHO WORKS AND
STRIVES ABOVE EVERYTHING TO SHED HIS WICKED POISONOUS STYLE WILL ESCAPE THE
TERRIBLE TRAP CALLED ‘STYLE’.
She is telling you something and it can be
known whether it is correct or wrong and if you don’t care, don’t know what to
make of it, self resistance must be stirred that leads to stress.
It is not that it pays to keep a cool head
but is it good or bad, correct or wrong to keep a cool head. Whatever cool head
that is kept, can be kept is not truly cool or calm but contrived or false.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO HAVE A CALM UNPERTURBED
MIND AND IT IS AN INCOMPARABLE EFFORTLESS RELEASE FROM SUFFERING AND DANGER BUT
IT IS NOT SOMETHING YOU CAN KEEP BUT IT IS DEVELOPED, NURTURED UNTIL IT IS THE
DEFAULT STATE OF THE MIND, NOT BECAUSE IT PAYS BUT BECAUSE IT IS GOOD AND
CORRECT STATE OF THE MIND.
TO MEAN, CALCULATING PEOPLE EVERYTHING IS
ABOUT GAIN, PROS AND CONS, WHETHER IT PAYS OR NOT AND THAT IS THE PATH TO
ETERNAL WOES.
Emotional people cannot keep
a cool head except in their delusion they can:
As long as you harbour emotions, like and
dislike, can be agitated and confused, you are a fool to think you can (truly)
keep a cool head; you can use force to temporarily control your emotions and
tendency to get worked up but this restraint is itself suffering and leads to
added agitation and so it an exercise in self and other deception to speak of
the payment of keeping a cool head.
AN EMOTIONAL PERSON IS NOT A MASTER OF
HIMSELF, IT IS NOT FOR HIM TO DECIDE WHEN TO BE COOL AND WHEN TO GET EXCITED,
HE MAY NOT EXPRESS HIS AGITATION/EXCITEMENT OR HE MAY USE FORCE TO TEMPORARILY
SUPPRESS HIS EMOTIONS BUT THIS IS CONTRIVED, STRESSFUL AND LEADS TO FURTHER
AGITATION.
I AM NOT CONSCIOUS OF HAVING TO KEEP A COOL
HEAD. NOWADAYS MY MIND IS INTRINSICALLY CALM AND CLEARLY THINKING BY
DEVELOPMENT AND NURTURANCE.
A cool head is not something
you keep but develop:
A cool head (that is true) is never
something you keep but something you develop by meditation and constant
effacement of your emotions, expelling emotions that have arisen until emotions
have been destroyed and when emotions have become extinct, your mind is
automatically effortless cool. So long as the ambers of emotion remain in your
mind you are a fool to think you can keep cool, it is all for show for others
and self that raises more conflict that is self-defeating even exacerbating.
Calculating is not conducive
to calm:
‘Pay’ denotes a calculating mentality which
is not conducive to calm which not something you can keep but something that is
developed by destroying emotions and so what is tendered, ‘it pays to keep a
cool head’ does not make sense, is false and if you cannot see why, you must
stir resistance and experience stress. She is telling you shit is food.
Whether you intend it or not, know it or
not, tears of the widows is a style of stating something that is intended to
stir emotions in others and rather than meritorious, it incurs debts to be
repaid as suffering in the future and so you are a fool needlessly sticking your
neck out for suffering.
THE TROUBLES/ SUFFERINGS/ DIFFICULTIES/
TRIBULATIONS OF THE WIDOWS ARE THE CORRECT OR PROPER WAY TO STATE THE MATTER.
THE BUDDHA SAID YOU MUST BE SKILFUL TO ESCAPE SUFFERING AND JESUS SAID YOU WILL
BE JUDGED FOR EVERY CARELESS WORD YOU SAY.
NO NEED TO DWELL ON THE TEARS OF THE
WIDOWS, SO LONG AS YOU ARE PASSIONATE AND ATTACHED TO THIS WORLD THERE IS NO
RELEASE FOR YOU. THE BUDDHA SAID YOU HAVE ALREADY WEPT TEARS GREATER THAN THE
OCEANS, WHAT IS A FEW MORE TEARS? THERE IS A WAY OUT TO NO MORE TEARS AND IF
YOU AND EVERYONE HERE WILL NOT TAKE IT, THEN IT IS SELF FLAGELLATION TALKING
ABOUT TEARS OF THE WIDOWS.
Jack Kirby: A master of all genres
It is not good but dangerous, foolish to be
liberal in praising others. If the person is not wholesome or what does (eg
creating comics) is not wholesome but evil then if you praise him you are
headed even for hell according to the Buddha.
IF THE PERSON YOU PRAISE IS NOT GOOD BUT
BAD OR EVIL OR HARMFUL TO OTHERS THEN THE BUDDHA TELLS YOU THAT YOU CAN END UP
EVEN IN HELL PRAISING OR UPHOLDING SOMEONE WHO IS EVIL.
PRAISING SHOULD BE DONE SPARINGLY AND ONLY
TO THOSE WHO DESERVE PRAISE, THOSE WHO ARE WHOLESOME OR NOBLE. THOSE WHO LIKE
OR HAVE BEEN PROGRAMMED TO EASILY HEAP PRAISE ON OTHERS MAY BE STICKING THEIR
NECKS OUT FOR THE CHOP, ACCRUING DEBTS TO BE REPAID BY SUFFERING IN THE FUTURE.
THERE IS NO SUCH AS HARMLESS AND HARMFUL
PRAISE, ALL PRAISES (CLEVER GIRL) IF FRIVOLOUS OR ENCOURAGES THE RECIPIENT TO
BE DELUDED OR MAINTAIN HIM OR HER IN SUFFERING INCURS DEBT.
Why your style excludes you
from heaven:
FOR A PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS CORRECTLY, ALL
STYLE (PROLONGING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING/ACCELERATING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS)
STIRS OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES, STRESSING OTHERS, MAKE THEM RESTLESS AND UNABLE TO
CONCENTRATE.
IF YOU WERE ALLOWED TO GO TO HEAVEN YOU
WILL CREATE HAVOC THERE LIKE A FARTING MAN WILL CREATE HAVOC FARTING ALL THE
TIME.
BECAUSE YOUR STYLE IS POISONOUS, TOXIC,
STIRS OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES, CAUSES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOU
CANNOT BE ALLOWED INTO HEAVEN BECAUSE YOU WILL DISTURB THE PEACE THERE, IT
WOULD BE LIKE LETTING A BULL INTO A CHINA SHOP.
THEREFORE IF YOU HAVE STYLE, YOU STRETCH
SYLLABLES, ACCELERATE IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO GO TO HEAVEN
AND THAT MEANS ETERNAL SUFFERING AND ENDLESS DEATHS.
No nonsense allowed in
heaven:
Whilst style and many things people say and
do (eg the ooos and ahhhs) may make much ‘great’ sense to you and everyone
here, it is nonsense and no nonsense is allowed in heaven and so if you have
style you cannot go to heaven.
PROLONGING SYLLABLES, ACCELERATING SPEED
AND LOUDNESS ARE MEANINGLESS, WASTES CONSIDERABLE ENERGY, THEIR PURPOSE IS FOR
SOUND EFFECT, FOR SHOW, FOR STIRRING OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES AND SO IF YOU
CONSTANTLY PRACTICE WHAT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE, IS NONSENSE AND HARMFUL YOU
CANNOT GO TO HEAVEN WHERE EVERYTHING MAKES SENSE AND IS MEANINGFUL, FULLY
UNDERSTANDABLE.
No comments:
Post a Comment