Thursday, November 20, 2014

Historic first landing on comet:



Historic first landing on comet:

A robot makes the first, historic landing on a comet, but its status remains uncertain after anchoring harpoons fail to fire.
China and the US unveil "historic" new pledges on greenhouse gas emissions, as the two leaders meet for talks in Beijing.
By historic is meant noteworthy or great but it is rubbish, you have debt wanting others to believe what is not historic is wonderful and if you truly perceive it is historic then you have false perception that ends in insanity.
IT IS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT COMET LANDING AND GREENHOUSE PLEDGES ARE HISTORY AND THAT LEADS TO MAD PERCEPTION.
BECAUSE IT IS NOT NOTEWORTHY OR GREAT YOU HAVE DEBT TELLING OTHERS IT IS SO.
IT IS OBJECTIVE, CANNOT BE DISPUTED THAT WHAT IS LABELLED HISTORIC IS WORTHLESS, HOLLOW, EMPTY AND SO ANYONE SPEAKING THUS IS DELUDED, INCURRING DEBT.
Labour leader Ed Miliband tells the BBC's Nick Robinson that the party will go forward "united"
It is not because it is true or necessary that he says so but it is always driven by emotion to self-promote, be defiant countering assertions by others and because it is not necessary nor true to say it, the person is courting insanity and suffering saying. Let others decide if you can be PM, no need to tout yourself except for false self identity views that the Buddha said is a fetter to future woe.
To be PM too is a form of acquisition, covetousness or greed that leads to woe not happiness.
Only robots cringe. Cringing is a programmed rehashed response triggered by stirred mental force to dislike what you read or see and it denotes the person is a rehashing robot and his understanding of something he reads is not reason but stirred blind mental force that has no understanding.
RATHER THAN CRINGING, THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER IS WHETHER WHAT YOU READ IS TRUE OR FALSE, GOOD OR BAD, NECESSARY OR UNNECESSARY, SENSIBLE OR SENSELESS.
Why China's Economy Needs More Stimulus: BNY Mellon's Cox
Even in economic matters dear to their hearts they don’t understand, what more matters that are not dear?
If economic expansion is genuine, it is never due to stimulus and if it is due to stimulus it is not genuine but artificial, faked due to steroids. And what is the nature of this stimulus? It is injection of money, lowering of interest rates, embarking on expensive ambitious infrastructural projects even useless projects like hosting Olympic Games which are forms of dangerous use of debt to sustain and expand a flagging or fading economy.
If you understood truly you would know such support is false, deceptive and dangerous and so it is, mankind’s current economic vitality is steroidal than genuine and like athletes on steroid you can expect serious even fatal consequences down the line. Still don’t understand?
How does one truly understand the statement?
If you understand the Syrian situation (as it is possible) then your course of action is correct, out of true understanding. If you do not understand correctly the Syrian situation (because you don’t understand) then you device strategies, plans that are never correct but wrong because it is not out of true understanding and when it does not work, you review it but no matter how much you review, still it is not the right thing.
Why strategies are never correct:
Strategies are predetermined courses of action and you undertake them precisely or approximately with or without modifications in which you are a robot carrying out the plans rather than a master. The person with true understanding has no plans, makes no plans, he understands the situation as it is unfolding, progressing and acts according and because he truly understands and therefore his understanding is correct, his actions too are always correct.
STRATEGIES ARE FOR ROBOTS, THOSE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND NEVER FASHION AND FOLLOW STRATEGIES.
Window 8 cheats and it can be dangerous:
I remembered well I transferred a video file to my USB drive but when I opened the drive on Windows explorer I could not find the file and I thought I must have forgotten to transfer the file.
Then I remembered the same thing happened in the past so I removed the USB drive and reinserted and now as if by magic the file was there.
How to explain?
Windows 8 may be cheating, deceiving you (dangerously). In order to speed up start up, it does not start from the beginning but from a memorized point from the last shutdown and so when the computer was last shutdown, it memorized the details of the USB drive that was still inserted and when I inserted the same USB drive before I started up, windows 8 rehashed the recorded image of the USB drive content which did not include this fresh or new video file. When I removed and reinserted the drive it forced windows to update the contents.
YOU MUST INSERT THE USB DRIVE AFTER (NOT BEFORE) START UP OF WINDOWS BECAUSE WINDOWS CHEATS AND IF THE USB DRIVE WAS THERE BEFOREHAND IT ASSUMES NOTHING HAS CHANGED AND PRESENTS THE IMAGE OF THE USB CONTENTS WHEN IT SHUT DOWN WHEN THE USB DRIVE HAD BEEN REMOVED, TAKEN AWAY, MODIFIED AND REINSERTED.
THERE ARE ACTUALLY MANY SIGNIFICANT FLAWS IN WINDOWS 8, IT IS DECEPTIVE, UNRELIABLE AND MICROSOFT NEVER BOTHERED TO CORRECT THEM BUT INSTEAD TRY TO ADD MORE AND MORE GIMMICKY IMPRESSIVE FEATURES (LIKE GLASS EFFECT).
MANY TIMES I HAVE RECORDED A TV VIDEO IN ANOTHER COMPUTER TO PLAYBACK AT HOME BUT MYSTERIOUSLY THE VIDEO IS NOT THERE BUT IF I REINSERTED THE USB DRIVE, IT THEN APPEARS WHICH MEANS TO SAY WINDOWS 8 DOES NOT ACCURATELY TELL YOU THE CONTENTS OF THE USB DRIVE JUST AS IT ALWAYS TELLS YOU ‘THIS FOLDER IS EMPTY’ BEFORE IT HAS CHECKED IF IT WAS INDEED EMPTY.
Microsoft’s purpose is to impress not be true and good:
Even using Windows 8 casually, I can detect many serious flaws.
Often you select a batch of files you want to copy to a new destination and if you wanted to add more files or unselect some of them, if you made a mistake clicking just outside the small boxes, the whole selection that was painstakingly assembled is undone and you have to start over again.
SURELY MICROSOFT SHOULD HAVE THE THOUGHTFULNESS TO ASK. ‘ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO UNDO ALL YOUR SELECTIONS?’ BEFORE UNSELECTING EVERYTHING WHEN IT SHOULD REALIZE THE UNSELECTION IS UNLIKELY TO BE INTENTIONAL BUT MAY BE UNINTENTIONAL BECAUSE THE BOXES TO MARK ARE SMALL?
MICROSOFT IS STUPID AND THAT CAUSES TROUBLE TO CUSTOMERS. IF A USER SELECTED A BUNCH OF FILES, HE IS UNLIKELY TO WANT TO CANCEL ALL THE SELECTIONS WHEN HE CLICKED NEAR AN UNSELECTED SELECTION BOX.
Your printer is off line?
Sometimes there is some printing glitch and the error message appears, ‘your printer is offline’. My printer is never online so how can it be offline? The message should be your printer is disconnected or unavailable.
Brent crude oil price falls below $80 a barrel for the first time since 2010, as Saudi Arabia fails to confirm a cut in production.
Dwindling oil reserves was touted as the cause of soaring oil prices and now those reserves should be even lower so why has oil fallen closer to the past $45 per barrel?
IT IS NOT DWINDLING OIL RESERVES THAT IS THE CAUSE OF ESCALATING OIL PRICES BUT IT IS THE DERELICTION OF DUTY BY AUTHORITIES PLUS CRONISM TO ALLOW BIG SHARKS LIKE GOLDMAN SACHS AND MORGAN STANLEY TO ENTER INTO OIL MARKETS WHERE THEY CAN PUSH UP OIL PRICES BY MANIPULATION (A LOT OF THE TRADES APPARENTLY DONE REMOTELY IN LONDON ON THE ICE EXCHANGE) MAKING HUGE PROFITS AND GIVING OIL PRODUCERS A BIG WINDFALL THAT IS THE CAUSE OF SOARING OIL PRICES THAT CHILLED THE WORLD ECONOMY.
Delicacies do not exist except in the sensuality of deluded people. If delicacies exist for you, you are headed for eternal wandering, suffering and death.
ALL FOOD IS A BAIT TO DEATH AND SUFFERING AND IF YOU WERE TO TURN AWAY FROM FOOD, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DELICACIES, IF THERE ARE DELICACIES FOR YOU AND IT HAS MEANING AND IS IMPORTANT YOU ARE HEADED FOR ETERNAL DEATH AND SUFFERING.
Jesus: You shall not care for what you shall eat and wear
Jesus said you (those who are sheep) shall not care for what you shall eat and wear and you care about delicacies and non-delicacies, stylish and non stylish clothes?
FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE, HOW THEY DRESS, HOW THEY APPEAR, THE FOOD THEY EAT, DELICACIES ARE VERY IMPORTANT AND THEY DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE HEADING FOR THE CLIFF DOWN WHICH THEY WILL PLUNGE AND THAT IS NEVER FUN BUT THEY WILL SCREAM.
Former teenage model has described being 'drugged and raped' by comedian in 1980s
There were apparent a dozen accusations (including male) of rape and drugging and so behind the apparent jovial, ‘affable’ exterior can lurk a dangerous monster. How many celebrities and public figures have similar skeletons in their closets? I would say more even much more than you think. You don’t succeed, rise to the top in this world without having some very dark side hidden.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE PUTTING ON A SHOW, REHASHING, FAKING IT AND BEHIND THE RESPECTABLE FAƇADE THEY PROJECT MUST HARBOUR DARK EVIL IMPULSES AND WITHOUT SHEDDING YOUR EVIL STYLE, THERE IS NO CURE FOR THE DEMONS HIDDEN.
Michael Schumacher's family 'remain confident' of recovery as official website relaunched
Such a statement affects everyone who comes into contact, even those casually involved and if it is false or deluded it has karma attached to be repaid as suffering.
There is no need to be confident or diffident of something you do not know (recovery), it is a form of make belief (which is lapsing dangerously into falsity) and denial of reality. Suffice you know his condition is not good and he may or may not improve, it is wicked, evil to remain confident or diffident.
It is because something that you are partisan to is not good and you do not know if it will improve or not that you have to foolishly, wrongly assert you remain confident, never wisely, rightly assert you remain confident as a result of which you are lapsing dangerously into make belief that ends in insanity, you are guilty of misleading others with karma attached to be repaid as suffering. Suffice you know his condition is not good and he may or may not improve, what is there to be confident or diffident?
Confidence is the more that comes from evil never good:
Jesus said, let your yes be yes, anything more comes from evil (never good).
And so, if you let your yes be yes only, his condition is bad, he may or may not improve, that you are confident (or diffident) is the more that comes from evil.
Reforms are never the true or correct answer and it is merely for show.
If what you are doing is true and good, what is there need for reforms? It is because what you is do is bad that you need reforms and reforms are never the correct answer. If you have truly changed and now abide in truth and goodness, it is immediately apparent, what is there to talk about reforms?
DOING WHAT IS GOOD OR RIGHT IS THE CORRECT ANSWER AND BECAUSE HUMANITY WILL NOT, CANNOT EMBRACE TRUTH AND GOODNESS, WHATEVER THE REFORMS ARE NEVER THE ANSWER BUT MERELY FOR SHOW, CHANGING ONE EVIL ACT FOR ANOTHER ACT THAT MAY BE (BUT NOT NECESSARILY) MORE ACCEPTABLE AND MATERIALLY REWARDING.
All falsity said or done harms others incurring karma:
Whatever a person says or does can be determined to be true or false, meaningful or meaningless and if what you say or do is false or meaningless, it harms others and you are liable for suffering even if you did not know it was false or senseless or you thought it was true or good.
Thus anyone who speaks of confidence, I have confidence in this or that is guilty of speaking something that is false or meaningless (confidence) and he is guilty of plying others with falsity with debt incurred.
The purpose of appeal can only be to jail Anwar:
Surely Saiful and the ruling elite aligned with him knows whether the case is genuine or not, sodomy did or did not occur?
If sodomy did occur it would be unusually generous of their part to let Anwar off the hook by acquitting him previously.
Based on the evidence and prosecution of the case there can be no true merit of the case and it should have been dismissed (the attorney general should not have allowed the case to go to court) and so this is never a case of true process of justice and whilst the public may be in the dark as to whether sodomy took place at all, Saiful should know for sure and so why is he appealing knowing it is fabricated except to get Anwar to jail and so those who hold hopes of an acquittal need not hold their breath.
SURELY SAIFUL AND THE AUTHORITIES KNOWS WHETHER THIS IS A GENUINE CASE OF SODOMY OR NOT AND IF THEY KNOW, WHY ARE THEY APPEALING EXCEPT TO CONVICT AND JAIL ANWAR? IF IT IS BOGUS THEN THEY ARE NOT SEEKING JUSTICE BUT A LEGALIZED CONVICTION AND JAIL.
NO ONE CAN SEEK TRUE JUSTICE FOR BOGUS ALLEGATIONS BUT THE PURPOSE MUST BE, WITH CONNIVANCE, TO OBTAIN CONVICTION AND JAIL YOUR ENEMY AND UNLESS THEY DEVELOP COLD FEET OR HESITATE, IT IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION ANWAR WILL BE JAILED.
THUS UNLESS THEY WAIVER FOR WHATEVER REASONS, ANWAR WILL BE CONVICTED AND JAILED. THEY DO NOT HAVE TO JAIL ANWAR IMMEDIATELY AND THE RESERVE OF JUDGMENT IS SHADOW PLAY, TO ACT AS IF DUE PROCESS HAS OCCURRED WHEN IF DUE PROCESS HAS OCCURRED THE CASE SHOULD CLEARLY HAVE BEEN DISMISSED.
ANYONE WHO THINKS BASED ON EVIDENCE ADDUCED THIS CASE IS VERY COMPLICATED, REQUIRES MUCH DELIBERATION, GUILT IS HARD TO DETERMINE IS DELUDED.
BASED ON MERIT ANWAR SHOULD BE ACQUITTED AND SO THIS IS NEVER ABOUT CORRECT JUSTICE AND SURELY SAIFUL KNOWS WHETHER HIS ACCUSATION IS TRUE OR FALSE AND IF IT IS FALSE WHY IS HE APPEALING UNLESS HE IS MAD OR HE WANTS ANWAR IN JAIL.
MH370 and Anwar’s sodomy conviction:
Anwar was convicted, his previous acquittal overturned and he was sentenced to jail on the eve of MH370’s disappearance.
The captain was a noted Anwar supporter and was said to have attended court that day and so he must have been upset and this may be the straw that broke the camel’s back and he resolved to end it all somewhere alone away from the insanities of this world in the middle of the Indian Ocean (and probably leave a pile of shit or trouble for the ruling elite to contend with). If this is the case, then those perpetrating the bogus sodomy have part of the blame for MH370 with karma due.
It is almost certain the captain must have killed his co-pilot probably by strangling him from behind and he opened the side cockpit window to depressurize the plane killing everyone aboard whilst he survived on cockpit oxygen supply. If the co-pilot was alive he would have noticed the switching off of transponder, radio communications and ACARS. He could not have been shut out of the cockpit as contended because ACARS was deactivated long before the plane returned to Kota Baru to cross over to Penang and the co-pilot if alive would have alerted authorities.
If the co-pilot had been shut out of cockpit then captain must have killed everyone by opening the cockpit window and flying up to 45,000 feet for 20 minutes before going into the cabin to deactivate ACARS that would be awkward. If he strangled the co-pilot first then he would be free to do what he wanted.
No way that Anwar will not be jailed:
If sodomy is true then surely they will jail Anwar and Anwar will be jailed.
If sodomy is bogus then the purpose of Saiful’s appeal is never to seek justice but seek Anwar’s conviction and jail (with connivance).
UNLESS FOR SOME REASON THEY HESITATE OR HAVE COLD FEET, ANWAR IS AS GOOD AS JAILED.
IF SODOMY IS GENUINE, SURELY THEY WILL NAIL ANWAR, PUT HIM IN JAIL.
IF SODOMY IS BOGUS THEN SURELY THE APPEAL IS NEVER UP TO ANY GOOD OR JUST FOR FUN BUT TO FALSELY CONVICT AND JAIL ANWAR.
SO EITHER WAY, ANWAR IS DEAD. YOU CAN ALL GO HOME AND SAVE YOUR ARGUMENTS TO YOURSELF.
PM’s refusal to be subpoenaed is telling and damaging:
If you are truly innocent of complicity then even if it is below your dignity and troublesome to attend court you would attend court just to clear your name rather than evade, give excuses not to attend and so his refusal to attend court is de facto admission of complicity for those who truly understand.
If you are complicit then court attendance can be uncomfortable and undesirable and so if a man wanted to hide his complicity he would attend court just for show to appear he has nothing to hide.
And there is ample evidence Saiful met with officials at the highest echelons including police officers before the alleged sodomy.
Appointed by a president and married to an FBI agent - a profile of Michael Garcia, the man behind Fifa's corruption report.
There is never a true need to say that and so he is saying it for false and foolish deceptive purposes not realizing he will be punished if he does not do as he says.
If there are people who does bad things that he conveniently closes his eye to, as is likely if not certainly eg for financial inducements, his head is on the chopper board for misleading people what a great crime crusader he is.
When you lie you train yourself to ignore truth:
If you agree your lies are not good for others, even dangerous and can be fatal for others then your lies are dangerous even fatal for yourself, not so much because there is punishment by God but you are foolishly endangering yourself.
When a person lies he must train himself to ignore the truth in favour of his lie and this is conditioning, a form of robotic programming and in time to come, if he keeps lying, he loses contact with truth, with reality which are completely ignored and he perceives his lies as true, good for himself and others.
APART FROM THE PATH TO FUTURE INSANITY, WHATEVER IS FALSE IS DANGEROUS, CAN BE FATAL AND INITIALLY WHEN YOU START TO LIE YOU KNOW WHAT YOU SAY OR DO IS NOT TRUE AND YOU HAVE TO TRAIN, CONDITION YOURSELF TO IGNORE THE TRUTH UNTIL YOU BECOME VERY GOOD AT NOT SEEING THE TRUTH, THE TRUTH IS TOTALLY IGNORED AND YOU ARE ENGULFED BY FALSITY YOU PERCEIVE IS TRUE AND THIS IS DANGEROUS, CAN BE FATAL.
IT IS BECAUSE LYING AND ACCEPTING (FROM OTHERS) WHAT IS FALSE IS DANGEROUS, IT MUST STIR RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS AND TRAINS YOU TO RESIST WHATEVER YOU RECEIVE.
IF WHAT SOMEONE SAYS OR DOES TO YOU IS FALSE, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO TRULY UNDERSTAND IT AND SO IT MUST BE RECEIVED WITH STIRRED RESISTANCE THAT LEADS TO STRESS.
AND SO EVEN IF YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT THE OTHER PERSON IS SAYING IS CRAP (EG I HAVE GREAT CONFIDENCE IN BLAH, BLAH, BLAH IS CRAP NEVER TRUTH) STILL YOUR RESISTANCE IS STIRRED LEADING TO STRESS.
NEVER THINK LIGHTLY OF LIES OR FALSITIES, IT IS EVIL AND DANGEROUS FOR SELF AND OTHERS, TELLING LIES TRAINS YOU TO IGNORE THE TRUTH UNTIL YOU BECOME BLIND TO TRUTH AND THAT IS DANGEROUS AND SUFFERING NEVER HAPPY NO MATTER HOW DIEHARD CRIMINAL YOU ARE. AND SO IT IS THE BUDDHA SAY YOU MUST GUARD THE TRUTH.
If you cherish your sanity then never lie:
The end point of lying is insanity; those who habitually lie are courting insanity and will become mad, for those who see, understand.
AND SO IF YOU DO NOT GUARD THE TRUTH AS THE BUDDHA EXHORTS, YOU HAVE FAR BETTER THINGS TO DO (LIKE CHASE GIRLS AND MONEY) THEN WHEN YOU WILL TURN MAD, IT IS WELL DESERVED.
If sodomy is bogus what justice is Saiful seeking?
If sodomy is true Anwar will be jailed.
If sodomy is false, what justice is Saiful talking about, seeking? If it cannot be justice, it must be Anwar’s head he is seeking, to put him behind bars.
IF SODOMY IS BOGUS, IT IS RUBBISH TO TALK OF JUSTICE BUT SAIFUL IS SEEKING ANWAR’S HEAD AND WITH THE CONSIDERABLE HELP OF THE SYSTEM, ANWAR’S FATE IS DETERMINED NOT BY ERUDITE JUDICIARY WISDOM BUT EXECUTIVE FIAT.
This is a sign of dangerous exploitation driven by unfettered greed. They should have raked in ‘fabulous’ money through listing but not satisfied they want to borrow more money based on their overrated share price and get rich even quicker with major shareholder the only certain gainer whilst the company may collapse from overambitious expansion.
Here again is company growth based on debt rather than savings and this is always risky or dangerous with big shareholders likely to gain even more. Its leaders look like crooks to me.
How does China see the world around it?
If it is false, it does not matter how China sees the world and you think it is relevant, you are deluded heading for insanity.
If something is the truth it is not about how China or India sees the world but objective, applies to everyone, not exclusive to China and so if it is about how China perceives the world it is something subjective, false and if you think it is worth finding out something false, you are sick, heading for insanity.
A stand is not a specific to a particular occasion answer but it is a nonspecific pre-orchestrated standardized response designed to be rehashed for a wide variety of similar situations and so only robots adopt stands, those who are not robots never adopt stands and stands are not good but bad.
Truth and goodness is never about moderation but what is good and bad, true and false, whatever is evil is evil no matter how you moderate it. There is no moderation in evil, it gets worse with time.
And so what is said makes no sense except to those who do not understand.
True understanding is never a stand or position, a stand is never a true understanding:
You cannot speak beforehand, in general, about a true understanding which requires the situation to arise before you can then understand and speak about it and do something about it, you can speak in general beforehand your stand on various issues which means it is a readymade prepared remembered and rehashed solution.
Understanding and stands are two very different things. Understanding is never a stand and a stand or position is never true understanding, if you have true understanding you will never adopt stands. A position is something fixed and that is false.
One thing they never stand for: Truth and goodness
Yes, there is one thing you must stand for and this world never stands for it, truth and goodness.
Whatever is true is also good and so good is another name for truth.
THERE IS ONLY ONE THING YOU MUST STAND FOR (PROTECT OR GUARD ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA) AND IT IS TRUTH AND WHATEVER IS THE TRUTH IS GOOD FOR SELF AND OTHERS.
It is always a matter of correctness never moderation:
Whatever the matter, whether it’s a person’s or government’s action, it is always a matter of correct or incorrect, good or bad action never moderation or extremism which is a wrong understanding (delusion) that incurs debt because you are presenting what is false to others and because it is delusion he is heading for insanity.
Whatever a situation can be correctly understood and the correct, good action known and undertaken, it is not a matter of moderation or extremism in action.
Moderation is a standard action devoid of understanding. Thus in situation A, the answer is moderation, in situation B the answer also is moderation, and on and on, what is so specific or understanding about it?
Speaking falsely to beat your own drum:
Beating your own drum is a false, evil reason to speak and you cannot speak truly, you can only speak falsely to beat your own drum and so it is that speaking about moderation is speaking falsely to beat your own drum how good you are (not).
YOU CANNOT SPEAK TRULY TO BEAT YOUR OWN DRUM, AN EVIL BASIS FOR SPEECH AND SO TO PRAISE MODERATION IN ITS STANDS IS TO SPEAK OF SOMETHING FALSE TO FALSELY BEAT YOUR OWN DRUM THAT IS LOST ON THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
If what you say or do is true (genuine) and good, it is not to woo voters for the next election, if what you say or do is to woo voters, it is never genuine or good, only to buy or win that vote and it is never fun wooing votes but it is suffering and the person must himself and others for being a hypocrite, forcing himself to do things to please and impress voters so they vote for him.
And so what is said is not meritorious but the opposite and there is karma due for exhorting others to do the same.
It is sinful wooing a boy or girl:
It not OK for a boy to woo a girl or a girl to woo a girl, it is entirely based on evil, blinded by infatuation, a stirring of mental force coupled with delusion the person is driven to do things, anything to get her man or girl.
WOOING IS NEVER BASED ON REASON OR TRUTH BUT IT IS A MATTER OF STIRRED FORCE AND DELUSION TO ACQUIRE, OBTAIN YOUR HEART’S DESIRE, YOU WOO YOUR WAY TO HELL NOT HEAVEN.
Pope denounces euthanasia as 'sin against God and creation'
Euthanasia can be good or bad, harmful or evil but it is not a sin against God or creation. A sin is something bad or evil done. It does not matter who it is done against, whatever is false, harmful to self and thus others is sin.
SIN DOES NOT REQUIRE AN ENTITY, IT IS ABOUT THE ACTION OR SPEECH ITSELF. IT IS THE NATURE OF THE ACT OR SPEECH. WHATEVER IS FALSE, HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS IS SIN. WHATEVER IS TRUE AND (TRULY) BENEFICIAL TO SELF AND OTHERS IS NOT SIN.
EUTHANASIA IS WRONG, DOES NOT WORK, IT IS NEVER THE END OF A BEING’S SUFFERING WHICH IS DUE TO SIN AND EVEN IF LIFE IS TERMINATED HERE, THERE IS EVEN AN OCEAN OF SUFFERING AWAITING AFTER DEATH. IF YOU THINK A BEING’S END SUFFERING IS SO TERRIBLE, PUTTING A BULLET TO HIS HEAD IS NEVER THE ANSWER, THERE IS EVEN WORSE SUFFERING THAN YOU ARE SEEING AND THE ANSWER IS TO AVOID COMMITTING ANY SIN WHICH IS THE CAUSE LEADING TO A PERSON’S TERRIBLE SUFFERING AT DEATH. IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER DEATH, THE BULLET PUTS AN END TO ALL THAT BEING’S SUFFERING THEN EUTHANASIA IS THE ANSWER, IF IT DOES NOT END TO BEING’S SUFFERING THEN IT IS DELUSION TO EUTHANIZE THE PERSON.
A person’s suffering at the end is due to end maker:
All beings here face the end maker, depending on what he has done or said, his suffering is determined by his end maker and the vast majority face terrible suffering at death because they have done a lot of bad, even what they think is good is deluded, bad and they have severely underestimated their suffering due. They are not blameless, far from it.
David Moyes joins Real Sociedad: I got advice from Sir Alex Ferguson before taking job in Spain, says manager
So what you got advice from Ferguson, you mean you need others to tell you what to do, you cannot decide on your own? Rather than being positive, it reflects negatively on him that he cannot decide for himself and he thinks it reflects well on him to say he sought Ferguson’s advice when it is the opposite.
Taking up the post is never an exercise in truth and goodness and so there is no correct answer as to whether he should or should not take up. So long as he is bonded to this world, it does not matter whether he takes or does not take up the job, what is at stake is not truth and goodness but disaster or vindication to his managerial reputation, food that perishes. It is silly that he should divulge publicly Ferguson gave him advice as if Ferguson is the arbiter of good judgment and what is correct.
WHAT HE SAID IS A STUPID THING TO SAY AND HE IS A FOOL OR DELUDED TO SAY THAT.
The truth about sordid British parliamentarians:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/i-watched-tory-mp-murder-4636497
This man whose father was a child abuser supplied him to conservative parliamentarians even ministers to be sexually abused in the 70’s and he said he saw three boys being murdered for various reasons.
PEDOPHILIA AND SODOMY IS RIFE IN THE HIGHER ECHELONS OF POWER IN UK.
IN MALAYSIA THERE ARE HUSHED UP STORIES OF WOMEN BEING MURDERED IN APARTMENT THAT HAVE LINKS WITH POLITICIANS. NORITTA SAMSUDIN IS APPARENTLY JUST ONE OF OTHER HUSHED UP CASES.
POWER, SEX, SODOMY AND MURDER GO HAND IN HAND OVER THE WORLD.
True British Conservative Parliamentary sodomists, pedophiles and murderers:
There are credible accounts that the British upper crust is strewn with sodomists, pedophiles and murders who get away with murder and they are covered by the police.
A boy recounted how he was escorted from a public swimming pool to a luxury house where Jimmy Saville joined in to sexually assault him and how he managed to escape by jumping through a window in the laundry (otherwise he may have been disposed off).
BRITISH PARLIAMENT MAY BE NO BETTER THAN ITS THIRD WORLD COUNTERPARTS, PARLIAMENTS ARE SECRET RAPISTS, PEDOPHILES AND THEY GET AWAY WITH THEIR EVIL DEEDS.
Netflix to adapt Queen Elizabeth II play The Audience
You are not Queen Elizabeth and so it is false and sinful for anyone to act Queen Elizabeth. It is even false or sinful for she herself to act herself because what is happening, what she will be doing during the play is not true merely acted and rather than harmless or fun or educational it is evil, harmful to act whatever way.
THERE IS NEVER A TRUE OR GOOD REASON FOR ANYONE TO ACT (NOT EVEN TO RE-ENACT A CRIME SCENE) BECAUSE IT IS NOT THE REAL THING, IT IS A REPRODUCTION THAT MUST BE BASED ON MEMORY, ON A PLAN, A SCRIPT THAT NECESSITATES THE CAST BEING MINDLESS ROBOTS.
AND SO, YOU TALK ABOUT SIN, SIN AGAINST GOD, ALL ACTING IS SIN, DANGEROUS, MAD, EVIL ACCORDING TO ME AND IF I AM CORRECT, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT SIN IS, YOU DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.
No economic activity in heaven:
There is no economic activity in heaven, no work that needs to be done, just eternal truly enjoying yourself and work is never enjoyable except to perverts.
99% of economic activity on earth is actually wasteful, unnecessary (administrative, paying road taxes and licences), evil (eg gambling, liquor), purely wasteful excessive consumption and removing all these economic activity, the economy would be much smaller and sustainable for the earth.
BECAUSE THE VAST MAJORITY OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS UNNECESSARY, WASTEFUL AND DESTROYS THE ENVIRONMENT CAUSING MASS EXTINCTION AND TOXIC POLLUTIONS, ENABLES A SMALL CORRUPT MINORITY TO ACCUMULATE MOST OF THE WEALTH, THE ECONOMY IS ENTIRELY BASED ON DEBT EVEN MASSIVE FATAL AMOUNTS OF DEBT, IT CANNOT CONTINUE FOREVER BUT WILL UNRAVEL WITH SERIOUS PAINFUL CONSEQUENCES.
IF YOU THINK A LOT OF THE ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS MEANINGFUL, NECESSARY OR GOOD, WORK IS GOOD YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE WRONG UNDERSTANDING OR VIEW THAT THE BUDDHA SAID LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB.
The statement implies there are some things it is OK to politicize and that is delusion. If politicizing is false, evil, exploiting an issue for personal or sectarian gains then you are deluded to selectively ban politicizing (because it suits your purposes) for certain things like education but not other things.
WHAT YOU SAY MUST MAKE SENSE AND THE ONUS IS ON YOU. IF WHAT YOU SAY DOES NOT MAKE SENSE YOU ARE COURTING INSANITY.
NEVER POLITICIZE EDUCATION IS A RULE AND PEOPLE WHO DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE ROBOTS ARE FOND OF RULES (THAT THEY OFTEN PAY LIP SERVICE TO, COIN AND IMMEDIATELY FORGET OR GO AGAINST).
Evil is nonspecific never specific:
You cannot eliminate evil directly, on a case by case basis eg not politicize education, so long as people will politicize education they will do all kinds of evil, you can zap this and that evil and more shoots of evil will sprout elsewhere.
AS LONG AS PEOPLE REMAIN STYLISH ROBOTS IT IS USELESS LECTURING THEM, NEVER DO THIS OR THAT EVIL BUT IT IS PIOUS HOLLOW RANTINGS BECAUSE IT WILL FALL ON DEAF EARS OR NEW EVIL WILL SPROUT FROM THEM ELSEWHERE BUT AS SOON AS THE PERSON SHED HIS EVIL REHASHED STYLE AND ACCESS THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF THE MIND, THEY DO NOT NEED YOU TELLING THEM NOT TO DO THIS OR THAT.
WHETHER WHAT YOU SAY IS USEFUL OR NOT, WORKS OR NOT IS OBJECTIVE NOT SUBJECTIVE AND IF IT WILL FALL ON DEAF EARS, IS INEFFECTIVE THEN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY.
Niceness is the heart of all evil in this world:
People in this world are nice never truly good.
They say or do things with a style that is designed to please and impress others (not to be true or good).
They say or do things that are not genuine, true or good, rehashed to please and impress others to get along or get what they want.
For those who understand they see there is a simultaneous substance and style combo in what people in this world say or do that is rehashed not freshly composed and their intention is to be nice (when they are not nasty or bitchy), to stir others’ mental forces to like or be impressed or pleased, not to be true or good to others.
SO LONG AS A PERSON REMAINS IN NICENESS, HE CAN TRY TO ZAP THIS AND THAT EVIL (EG SMOKING, ALCOHOLISM, STEALING, LYING) BUT IT IS ALL IN VAIN, THERE IS EVIL IN HIM THAT MUST FIND EXPRESSION.
THEY ARE NOT EVEN GOOD TO THEMSELVES, CAUSING THEMSELVES INSOLUBLE RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, EXISTING AS A REHASHING ROBOT, WHAT MORE THAT THEY CAN BENEFIT OTHERS?
To go to heaven you must not harm others:
With every word they say, every action they undertake people with style are bombarding others with totally unnecessary force prolonging, changing speed and strength that induces stress by causing resistance, restlessness and scatters the concentration of others, they are guilty of falsely robotically rehashing to others than induces others to similarly rehash robotically and this is harming others FULL TIME and so long as you are constantly harming others, you are not clean and cannot go to heaven which means you are trapped here heading for eternal suffering and endless deaths.
Thinking is false and harmful but is a personal thing and so it is not a bar to heaven but if you can stop thinking you are cleaner and that gives two Ages in heaven.
Similarly stirring your mental force to like or dislike is a personal thing and does not harm others directly and it is not a bar to heaven but its elimination gives higher happiness and four ages in heaven.
He sounds like he is such a generous and benevolent man when the case may be the world is carrying the US by supplying it goods for pieces of paper that the US cannot honour, the US owes the world much and it benefits considerably by being a reserve currency and currency of settlement of world trade.
HOW NICE (NOT GOOD) TO TELL A DELUDED WORLD THE US CANNOT CARRY THE WORLD WHEN THE REVERSE IS TRUE, THE WORLD IS GIVING THE US A FREE LUNCH BY KEEP ACCEPTING US PAPER FOR GOODS.
Your like and dislike is your own personal suffering:
It is useless and mad and suffering, never the pleasure it is made up to be to stir your mental force to like or dislike but it is your own personal suffering and foible so long as you do not act on your arisen like or dislike to harm others and so it is that like and dislike is not a barrier to the heavenly state but if a being can stop liking and disliking, he is higher in conduct and knowledge and his lifespan in heaven is longer at four ages.
LIKE AND DISLIKE IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER THE HAPPINESS IT IS MADE OUT TO BE BUT SO LONG AS YOU DO NOT ACT ON YOUR LIKE AND DISLIKE TO HARM OTHERS, IT IS YOUR OWN PERSONAL FOIBLE AND SUFFERING.
SIMILARLY THINKING IS ALWAYS EVIL, UNNECESSARY AND SUFFERING, YOU NEVER NEED TO THINK TO KNOW, YOU NEED TO SEE OR HAVE INSIGHT, THINKING IS YOUR PERSONAL BURDEN AND SUFFERING UNLESS YOU ACT ON YOUR THOUGHTS TO HARM OTHERS, THINKING IS NOT A BARRIER TO HEAVEN BUT ITS CIRCUUMVENTION GIVES TWO AGES IN HEAVEN.
This is a tacit admission of guilt because it is impossible a person who is innocent would not state his innocence. If you refuse to answer that too is blameworthy not blameless and there is suffering due for an offence.
NOT ANSWERING IS A SILENT ADMISSION OF GUILT BECAUSE IT IS UNTENABLE A PERSON WHO IS INNOCENT WILL NOT STATE HIS INNOCENCE. SILENCE IS BLAMEWORTHY NOT BLAMELESS.
Indonesia raises fuel prices by over 30%


Indonesia's rising domestic demand and waning oil production in the past few years have led to increased import levels of both crude oil and petroleum products.
Compared to Malaysia, Indonesia’s oil production is dwindling and it imports oil and so it is subsidizing oil imports. Malaysia is a nett oil exporter. It exports high grade petroleum and import lower grade petroleum for local consumption.
GLOBAL OIL PRICE DROP MAY BE BAD NEWS FOR MALAYSIA THAN GOOD NEWS BECAUSE THE LOSS OF WINDFALL FROM HIGH OIL PRICE WILL BE MORE THAN GAINS FROM RAISING DOMESTIC OIL PRICES.
Malaysia must be sizeable oil producer:
Malaysia is no pygmy when it comes to industrial and service sector and for oil and gas to account for 50% GDP it must be a sizeable oil producer and the masses may not be getting entirely the proceeds from petroleum and rid of hanky-panky Malaysia could more than afford to supply its populace with cheap oil.
Comparing is not based on understanding and it is wrong to compare Anwar with Tory paedophiles:
Those who understand do not compare and it is those without understanding who have to depend on comparison to get by erroneously dangerously.
Comparison is about matching a present situation with memory of a past situation for similarities and differences to decide if you can fit the past situation in the present and so comparison is based on memory and because ordinary people do not truly understand they have to depend on their memory, depend on comparisons to come to conclusions that may be seriously flawed.
Those Tory paedophiles which include ministers and very top people are corrupted, part of the system and they are able to carry out sustained violations over even decades because they were at the height of their influence and they were protected, covered up by the system even including the PM’s office and including the police.
If Anwar was corrupt he would remain in the system and be protected by the system rather than persecuted by the system. If Anwar had sodomized Saiful he would be a hypocrite and corrupt and he would have remained in the system rather than be chased out of the system with the police and judiciary bearing on him. If he sodomized Saiful and was corrupt then rather than facing jail he would have made a deal and gone into exile as many lesser innocent men would have done to escape suffering.
YOU CANNOT COMPARE ANWAR WITH DEVIANT TORY MINISTERS WHO ARE PART OF THE SYSTEM AND PROTECTED BY THE SYSTEM MORE THAN THE PUBLIC REALIZES AND NEWS IS EMERGING AFTER SO MANY YEARS BECAUSE THE PRESS IS NOT ALIGNED WITH THOSE IN POWER AND THESE ACCUSERS ARE WANING IN POWER. IF ANWAR WAS LIKE TORY MINISTERS, HE WOULD BE CORRUPT AND PROTECTED AND PART OF THE SYSTEM, NOT OPPOSING THE SYSTEM, A LESSER INNOCENT MAN MAY EVEN STRIKE A DEAL AND GO INTO EXILE AGAINST THE IMPLACABLE WRATH AND POWERS OF THE SYSTEM.
COMPARISON IS WHAT ORDINARY PEOPLE DO A LOT AND THE WAY BY WHICH THEY ‘UNDERSTAND’ THINGS HAPPENING BUT IT IS NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING BUT BASED ON MATCHING THE CURRENT WITH WHAT IS KNOWN IN THE PAST, IS A FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND SEEING SIMILARITIES AND COMING TO (WRONG) CONCLUSION THAT TWO DIFFERENT SITUATIONS ARE SIMILAR OR DISIMILAR.
It is only because you cannot understand that you resort to comparison:
If a person can understand and he understands a situation, it is absurd that he would have to resort to comparison and it is only because a person cannot understand, does not understand that he has to seek to memory, to matching, to comparison to provide him a conclusion he is unable to reach.
ONLY A PERSON WHO HAS NO UNDERSTANDING, IS UNABLE TO UNDERSTAND A SITUATION NEED RESORT TO COMPARISON WHICH IS BASED ON MATCHING, MEMORY TO SUPPLY AN ANSWER THAT IS ALWAYS WRONG AND CAN BE DANGEROUS.
A false matter forces you to compare with stirred resistance:
There are many subjects, matters that are false and the person, because he is desirous of partaking in the matter is forced to make comparisons to decide.
For example to choose what to have for dinner or which dress to buy, which colour of car to choose, it is not a matter of truth but taste or style and because it matters to you, you are forced to make comparisons to decide and that must be accompanied by raised resistance, indecision or conflict that leads to stress.
Comparing is a programmed action and only robots compare:
Comparing is not a fresh specific to the occasion action but it is programmed and ordinary people who are robots are well programmed to compare thy do not realize they are undertaking comparison. When a person looks into history as a guide or pointer he is engaged in comparison.
COMPARING IS A PERSON HAS TO UNDERTAKE AND IT IS WHAT A PERSON IS PROGRAMMED TO DO AND ONLY ROBOTS RESORT TO COMPARISON.
Those who think nothing wrong even right have a wrong understanding.
If the snap election is to advantage himself and disadvantage his adversaries it is an abuse of power that shows he is an unethical man and it has karma to be repaid as suffering. Elections are not due and if you call early elections to forestall worse conditions later or gain advantage that is wrong and has debt.
If there has been a shift of power, loss of majority, a resignation or death of a crucial member then that is valid reason for a snap election.
This is not a statement of truth but a vested statement that is false, designed to stir emotion, stir greed.
Easyjet report 40% rise in profit or $40 million profit is a factual statement but to speak of strong profit growth is to consciously or unconsciously tamper with reality to stir greed or make more to it.
Whether a profit is strong or big is up to the individual, even to say it is a 40% increase is not based on truth but calculation and that is false.
ROBOTS ARE WELL PROGRAMMED TO CALCULATE, COMPARE AND CATEGORIZE THINGS HAPPENING AND THESE ARE NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING BUT MEMORY.
IN ORDER TO ARRIVE AT 40% INCREASE IN PROFIT YOU MUST CALCULATE (DRIVEN BY GREED) AND SO THAT TOO IS A TAMPERED NOT TRUE STATEMENT. EASYJET REPORTS A PROFIT OF EG $500 MILLION AND IT IS A PRODUCT OF CALCULATION THAT YOU COME UP WITH 40% INCREASE AND IT IS NOT BASED ON UNDERSTANDING OR MEANING BUT PROGRAMMING.

No comments: