The Nature Of Doubt & Uncertainty

The Nature Of Doubt & Uncertainty:
THE MORE INTENSELY & LONGER YOU FORCE YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT YOU FALSELY SAY OR DO IS TRUE (IN ORDER TO MAKE YOURSELF AS CONVINCING OR CONFIDENT AN ACTOR TO OTHERS AS POSSIBLE), THE MORE INTENSELY OR URGENTLY MUST YOU REMIND YOURSELF OR DOUBT YOURSELF DEEP INSIDE THAT WHAT YOU SAY OR DO SO CONVINCINGLY IS ACTUALLY FALSE BECAUSE TO TOTALLY FORCEFULLY BELIEVE WHAT YOU FALSELY SAY OR DO IS TRUE IS TO BECOME TRULY MAD AND FOR THE SAKE OF YOUR SURVIVAL YOU MUST DEVELOP A HEALTHY DOUBT AND CYNICISM FOR YOURSELF AND EVERYTHING. THUS FALSE ACTING WHICH ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE PRACTICE NEVER OCCASIONALLY BUT ALL THE TIME EMBRACING WHAT AND HOW THEY SAY, DO, THINK AND PERCEIVE, IS THE MOTHER OF ALL THE DOUBTING AND UNCERTAINTY THAT THEY MUST ALL COMPULSORILY SUFFER FROM AND IN ADDITION ACTORS DELIBERATELY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY PRACTICE DOUBTING OF SELF AND OTHER FOR MANIPULATIVE OR PERSECUTORY PURPOSES.
This lady that I was drawing blood from asked me whether the lab boy will collect the blood today and I said yes. She again asked me a short while later the same question and as she left she turned at the door to ask me the third time whether the lab boy will collect the blood. She is suffering from mad doubt over a trivial matter that she can still control and suppress to enable her to function with a semblance of normality but she is tormented by doubt and unless she quits false acting (unlikely if not impossible) that is the true insoluble source for her doubts, she is headed for final totally uncontrollable mad doubt. Many (and those who accuse me of being hypercritical) do not realize they are on the same boat with her. She denied she was worried when her husband disagreed and she had seen various specialists for her unfounded fear of cancer, she complained that her blood looked too dark and she had lost weight when the machine showed her weight unchanged from a couple of years back.
PAUSE TO THINK WHENEVER YOU EXPRESS OR CAST DOUBT ON YOURSELF OR OTHERS EITHER FACETIOUSLY OR YOU ‘TRULY EXPERIENCE’ DOUBT BECAUSE YOU DO NOT REALIZE YOU ARE SETTING YOURSELF UP FOR MAD DOUBT BY PRACTICING DOUBT AND THEREFORE CONDITIONING YOUR MIND FURTHER TO DOUBT. EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU HAVE ‘TRUE’ DOUBT, YOU WILL BE WISE TO KILL IT AND LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY. EITHER YOU KNOW OR YOU DON’T KNOW SOMETHING SO WHAT IS THERE TO DOUBT? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU KNOW AND YOU PRETEND YOU DON’T KNOW OR YOU DON’T KNOW AND YOU PRETEND YOU KNOW THAT YOU MUST EXPERIENCE DOUBT IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS TRUE DOUBT BUT IT IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE FORCEFULLY AND EMOTIONALLY FAKED OR EXPERIENCED EMOTIONAL DOUBT SO LONG SO INTENSELY THAT IT NOW RISES WITH SUCH INTENSITY AND REALISM THEY BELIEVE THEIR DOUBTS ARE REAL OR NATURAL WHEN IT IS A SIGN THAT THEIR DOUBT HAS BECOME WELL CONSOLIDATED AND FUTURE MAD DOUBT BECKONS.
Doubt and uncertainty are two related involuntary forceful or emotional false mental states that are always suffering that can and will episodically rise to agonizing levels in all sinners but they can also be faked to deceive others. Anyone who experiences genuine doubt is a sinner or practices falsity.
Doubt and uncertainty are never harmless because they are painful and can and will rise to even tormenting levels, they further condition that mind to further more intense doubt and uncertainty so that it increasingly gets harder to eliminate doubt & uncertainty. Together they are one of three lower fetters or bonds that according to the Buddha lead to future states of woe that you ignore at your own risk.
Doubt is the emotional or forceful questioning or not accepting the truth or reality of something said or done or has happened that can be rational or irrational. Even if the doubt is rational or justified, it is sinful and causes stress because it is forceful and applies force on the mind. Doubt is initially rational and restricted but with age and practice it becomes progressively more irrational or bizarre, more widespread and easier to arouse, more intense and hard to shake off.
Uncertainty is the emotional state of being unsure, unable to make up one’s mind or be hesitant what something is all about, what to do or say, what decision or choice to make, unsure of what is true or false, what is harmful and what is beneficial that may initially be isolated to important decisions eg what is the correct answer to an exam question but because it is forceful and addictive it spreads to involve every facet of life like what to eat, what to say.
(Therefore the Buddha was not engaged in gibberish when he said doubt and uncertainty together is one of three lower fetters or bonds to states of future woe. Doubt and uncertainty are different but related conditions)
According to the Buddha, all beings that exist, including God are bound to existence by ten fetters. The Buddha said he had been the All Powerful One in the past. If you are totally not fettered, you become enlightened and do not desire to exist in any form anywhere anymore. There are five lower fetters of which three namely doubt & uncertainty, self-identity views and faith in rites and precepts lead to states of future woe whilst additional sensuality or attachment to the five senses not just sex and ill will the urge to harm others bond beings to this impure and therefore suffering world on earth. Heavenly beings are freed of these five lower fetters but are bonded by five higher fetters that also afflict lower beings namely attachment to forms {angels are formed beings in formed heaven}, the formless (higher brahmas are formless}, conceit (passive basking in one’s woe free joyful glory), rational or purposeful restlessness or desire for change that is not the mad forceful restlessness on earth and ignorance {once you are enlightened or awakened, you shed all ignorance and cease to desire existence in any form which is always unsatisfactory. Unchanging nirvana with neither coming nor going is the ultimate peace}
Doubt can only occur in a person who has fed himself falsity or has been fed falsity by others that he then forced himself or was forced by others to accept as true. Only after a person has accepted what is false is true does he start to entertain doubt that can initially be traced to the cause but as time passes and with repeated forceful denials and multiple similar abuses his doubting develop a reality of its own and becomes increasingly detached or dissociated from their causes so that it can infect trivial things that have little justification for doubt.
ANYONE WHO ACTS MUST HARBOR INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING DOUBT & UNCERTAINTY THAT HE CAN ONLY REPRESS BECAUSE HE IS FALSELY CREATING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACIBILITY FOR HIMSELF AND HE MUST ALSO EXPERIENCE INSOLUBLE DOUBT OF OTHERS WHO ALSO POISONOUSLY ACT TOWARDS HIM THAT HE CAN ONLY REPRESS AND INSTEAD HE HAS TO FAKE AS REAL AS HE CAN HE APPRECIATES THEIR POISON.
ANYONE WHO IS BESET BY RECURRING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION MUST EXPERIENCE DOUBT IN HIMSELF AND EVERYTHING, INCLUDING THE MEANING OF LIFE ITSELF.
There are two dire torments of forcefully accepting whatever is false is true, namely mad logic and mad doubt.
As one repeatedly forces oneself to accept what is false is true in a controlled fashion to get what one wants in life, one increasingly believes what is false is true until it can become very compelling, one is forced to believe by mental force that what is false is true. This is mad logic and for one who sees correctly this has already happened to many who cannot see no matter how they are demonstrated what is meant by acting in themselves and others. They are deluded but their delusions have not turned violent yet and they still can control the expression of their delusions not realizing they will ultimately lose control.
Anyone who forcefully say or do things that are false but forcefully insist to others they are true must develop a healthy doubt or question himself because to totally give in to believe what he says or does that is false is true is madness. How can anyone be certain of himself if he is constantly saying or doing false things as realistically as he can whilst treading the tightrope not to totally give in, to often dare himself to go right to the cliff of madness but turn back at the last moment? This is mad forceful doubt that cannot be quelled.
DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REALITY OR EXISTENCE BUT IT IS A CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL STATE ROOTED IN PEOPLE’S FALSE ACTING AND WHICH THEY FURTHER FECKLESSLY PRACTICE TO PERSECUTE EACH OTHER.
IF YOU NEVER PRACTICED FALSE SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR AND THEREFORE NEVER HAVE TO FORCE YOURSELF TO BELIEVE WHAT IS FALSE IN YOURSELF IS TRUE, YOU NEVER ACCEPT AS GENUINE WHAT YOU CAN SEE IS HARMFUL FALSE BEHAVIOR FROM OTHERS, YOU CANNOT EXPERIENCE ANY DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT YOURSELF OR ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD.
EVERY TIME YOU EXPRESS DOUBT, WHETHER REAL OR FAKED, TO INTIMIDATE OTHERS YOU COMMIT YOURSELF AFRESH TO DOUBT WHILST YOU ALSO WICKEDLY WANT OTHERS TO SHARE YOUR DOUBT. ON EVERY OCCASION YOU EXPERIENCE UNCERTAINTY EG WHAT TO COOK, YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF TO UNCERTAINTY AND ON EVERY OCCASION YOUR UNCERTAINTY BECOMES INTENSE EG YOU FEAR FOR YOUR LIFE IN A SITUATION, YOU HAVE INTENSIFIED THE UNCERTAINTY YOU ARE CAPABLE OF EXPERIENCING. THEREFORE THE WISE PERSON WILL DROP EVERYTHING HE IS DOING TO DISPEL ANY DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY THAT ARISES UNTIL THEY NO LONGER ARISE IN HIM.
There are two sources of doubt and uncertainty in ordinary people: One is the mandatory result of their constant hurtful and false acting and the other is the additional unconscious or deliberate practice of doubting and being uncertain to manipulate or persecute others.
Because ordinary people know too well the pain of doubt and uncertainty, they often mischievously or maliciously try to cast doubt and uncertainty on others that can be subconscious or concealed so that they do not realize they are doing so.
Whether expressed doubt and uncertainty is faked or genuine, because it is always forceful, you are conditioning yourself each time you raise doubt and uncertainty in yourself or others.
On top of the doubt and uncertainty they must compulsorily experience because of their constant false acting in speech, behavior, thought and perception, ordinary people frequently practice either intentionally or unintentionally doubt and uncertainty by casting doubt and uncertainty in themselves and others they think is justified but it is a delusion by saying with pretentious quizzicality “Are you sure???!!!” “Is that so???!!!” “Really???!!!” “I don’t believe you!!!” “I beg your pardon?” or “say that again” “Think again” “Take a hard look at yourself”. They fuss or tantalize over what they shall wear, eat, do or say in the process conditioning themselves to doubt and uncertainty.
Keeping others in suspense by remaining silent, startling someone by creeping up on them, making sudden loud noises, gambling and investing are forms of inducing or renewing doubt and uncertainty in yourself and others.
Hesitancy in speech and motion may either be involuntary (due to ingrained doubt and uncertainty) or voluntary intended to please or impress others (eg you are thoughtful or charming) and they are actually a form of self doubt and uncertainty and if actors watch themselves they are often in doubt or uncertain what they do or say and even how they should do or say it eg to change gears or not, to turn or not. Trembling and shaking is violent uncontrollable uncertainty that may be caused by fear, a mental force or emotion. Like stress, restlessness and all emotions, fear is not compulsory and not everyone is fearful or must experience fear in any situation.
Many do not realize they are practicing and reinforcing doubt and uncertainty for themselves when they speak with pauses or utterances such as ‘errr’, ‘hmmm’ that are partly for show and partly involuntary reflecting intrinsic doubt and uncertainty. Instead of speaking with constant speed and loudness “I don’t like it” they pause with stretched syllables “I … errr… don’t like it” to be impressive. Syllables are sometimes stretched because of hesitancy or doubt and uncertainty that can be involuntary or voluntary to be impressive.
Often people say “I think”, “Perhaps”, “Maybe” when they are actually certain and that is practicing and reinforcing doubt and uncertainty that leads to mad doubt and uncertainty.
To emotionally doubt and be uncertain is irrational and a form of mad logic because for any given situation if you let your yes be yes only you either know or do not know, it is either true or false, so what is there to doubt or be uncertain about?
Patronizing & Conceited:
Quote: Well I am still your friend even if you do not believe....I do not abandon people even if I think they may be deluded (Sounds high handed or patronizing and discriminating against those who are deluded. If you understood what the Buddha said, you will realize you won’t be here but in heaven if you are not deluded. Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep and if you are not deluded and heedless you will realize what he said is absolute because your laughter that is appreciable when you speak is never pleasure as it is faked to be but it disturbs and warps your mind. You laugh when you tell me your business is bad. Aren’t you sick to laugh as if it is fun when your business is bad? If you cannot say any of the many things I say, if I am calm and clearly thinking whilst you are evidently emotional & can be provoked to lash out, what dispensations can you offer me who may be deluded?).
Erase ‘well’ from ‘Well I am still your friend’ and there is no loss of meaning and therefore ‘well’ is said meaninglessly wasting substantial energy and it is not letting your yes be yes only but saying more that comes evil because it distracts. If you think ‘well’ is meaningful, you may be headed for madness. The meaning of ‘well’ that false actors hold dear is to express poignancy or uncertainty or emotion. Because all emotions are false and harmful, the only recognizable meaning of expressed ‘well’ is emotional and false. “I am still your friend” is the substance of the speech and ‘well’ is the useless for show style of the speech and therefore he is an actor. Have you ever heard Jesus said ‘well’ this and ‘well’ that? You are practicing madness because actors believe their ‘wells’ are meaningful that leads to total madness by saying ‘well’ and not letting your yes be yes only.
If the person does not believe you are his friend, you are being malicious not benevolent to create doubt, guilt and conflict by telling him you are still his friend as if you are such a great indispensable person you are still his friend even if he did not believe. What does it matter to tell him you are still his friend when he does not consider you his friend except to undermine his resolve and impress him how good you may not be?
Without unconditionally renouncing the personal attacks he made on my person, he is a shameless hypocrite or a sick or mad man to think he is still my friend or I can truthfully not make believe trust him as a friend knowing he harbors resentment or his warmth may belie his inner thoughts. Many see nothing wrong with love-hate relationships but think they are such wonderful ‘forgiving’ people when it is a mutual embrace of deceit and agony that leads to madness and violence.
You may have the right to tell another person “I am still your friend IF you believe” but you are saying more that comes from evil if you say “EVEN if you do not believe”.
It is easy or cheap for you on the emotion of the moment to say you are still my friend but can you ‘walk the talk’? You are a fool to make promises that you might not be able to fulfill and you would have then said something false.
If you were such a great or true friend you would not have emotionally attacked my person as being hypercritical, without insight, high standing, you would not have use strong words like take a hard look instead of close, careful or good look, you would not have said ‘certainly’ and ‘gravely doubt’ in an intimidating fashion.
His conciliatoriness is not necessarily motivated by goodness but it may be motivated by a mixture of emotional stress, guilt, selfish desire to continue the friendship and a feeling of power to not abandon people who may be deluded.
(No ordinary person will say the things I say. No one can say in truth he changed the world’s consciousness after 1977 as I did. If you think you are nevertheless my intellectual and moral peer, you may be correct or it may be you who thinks too highly of yourself)
Can you imagine the Buddha or Jesus saying, “Well I am still your friend even if you do not believe.... (The numerous dots are the written version of the urge to stretch things in this case the space between words and objectively prove I am correct to say he stretches his syllables not just here but everywhere. Stretching the space serves no function except for show to falsely impress with his deliberation or lingering, consumes prodigious energy cumulatively to create stress, restlessness and distraction because it detracts from the substance said. He says I may be deluded when he himself can be demonstrated objectively to be deluded) I do not abandon people even if I think they may be deluded”? He does not realize he is advocating conflict for himself and others, advocating the ‘earth rending’ ‘touching’ love hate relationship that is in truth intense pretense.
He thinks he is more wonderful than the Buddha in not abandoning me even if I may be deluded because the Buddha said he will abandon any tamable being who does not submit to taming or Jesus who said maidens who forgot to bring oil for their lamps when they came to meet the groom will not be admitted but will go to eternal punishment even if they afterwards fetched oil.
No Fellowship With Fools:
If you gain a mature companion,a fellow traveler, right-living & wise,overcoming all dangers go with him gratified &mindful.
If you don't gain a mature companion,a fellow traveler, right-living & wise,go alone like a king renouncing his kingdom,like the elephant in the Matanga wilds his herd.
(Better alone than company with fools)
HE IS FAR FROM ALONE IN EXPRESSING OPENLY OR SECRETLY THAT I WHO AM FREED FROM DOUBTS, UNCERTAINTY, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION MAY BE DELUDED. THE FACT THAT THEY SUFFER FROM REGULAR STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT THEY CAN ONLY MANAGE TO CONTROL AND SUPPRESS SHOULD SERVE AS WARNING OF FUTURE DOOM BUT UNTIL THEY WEEP AND GNASH THEIR TEETH EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY THEY CANNOT BELIEVE THEY WILL DO SO.
Mad Logic:
Being an emotional attacking person, why hasn’t he been outraged to directly deny my suggestion that he pries? If you do not or dare not say “I did not pry” but you ask me to give you a list of taboo topics, it means there is or may be truth in what I say.
Since you likely do pry, you unrepentantly laugh when speaking, you stretch your syllables with constantly changing speed and loudness (that can be objectively demonstrated by me) even after you have been told so, you should be pleased or proud that I have noticed you do so and sent an Email to thank me profusely for having noticed rather than lash out at me tit for tat without refuting my criticism?
If you are ashamed of your laughing whilst speaking and stretching syllables, why have you not desisted?
If there is substantial truth in what I say then you are scurrilous to launch an attack on me on totally unrelated matter.
To think that self insight is better than hypercriticism and ignoring others’ views is mad logic because anyone who has self insight will also have insight into others, it is impossible to have self insight in isolation and if you think it is possible, you have mad logic and courting future full blown madness. The emotional person does not think of the logic or consistency of what he says, he merely grasps at a concept eg in this case self logic is better to persecute others, feels smug in his correctness and forgets all about it or embrace even the opposite view (other insight is better than self insight because it enables one to see through the deception of others) in another occasion.
Hypercriticism:
You can only be hypercritical if you emotionally or forcefully criticize indiscriminately without reason everything that impinges on your awareness.
If my criticism although widespread is not emotional, there is no force, it is discriminate (I don’t criticize God, Jesus or the Buddha) and backed by rational reasons (not excuses) you are slandering me in saying I am hypercritical.
Paranoia Is Mad Perception:
When you perceive slights and insults where there are none, you take things personally when there is nothing you are paranoid, you see or perceive things falsely or you have mad perception that you can still control but you will inevitably become madly paranoid like all dictators do.
Actors are all very forcefully or emotionally sensitive or touchy people and never perceive things as they are but they are selective in their perceptions, wanting only to see and hear things that conform with their perverted world views and forcefully refusing or avoiding seeing and hearing things that are against their world views and they are sensitive to perceived slights real or imagined for others.
If ordinary people pay attention to themselves, they will detect themselves regularly helplessly getting hurt intensely by something someone said or did that they perceived as insulting when it is presumptuous. They are already owners of mad perception or paranoia that they do not realize will become completely mad unless they eliminated all force eliminated all emotion in their lives.
Proves Himself He Pries:
Contrary to people’s belief, prying is never subjective but it can be objectively and impartially determined. I have no interest in others’ personal affairs nowadays and what I advise is not personal, does not touch on any person’s personal lives. I have no interest in asking anyone about his personal life or habits eg what he does with his money, wife or broadband. Unless your interest in a person’s personal affairs is motivated out of goodwill or true concern for his wellbeing not salaciousness/sensationalism or ulterior motives, you are prying. It only makes it worse to deny because it creates the shadow of doubt in yourself. Whoever you are, however good you might believe you are, if in truth you pry, you must suffer because prying is forceful addictive attachment to the affairs of others that clutters your mind with information that is a burden, takes effort to conduct and conceal from yourself and the other person and there is a lurking fear of discovery.
Unless your intervention in the affairs of someone is constructive, motivated out of goodwill, you are meddling into the other person’s affairs or prying.
His criticism of me cannot be construed as unemotional or constructive but it was disparaging and intimidating, wanting me to know it is certainly true and therefore he is meddling in my business that is none of his business but motivated in this case by persecution.
UNLESS YOU SPEAK OF MY HIGH STANDING, BEING JUDGMENTAL AND BEING ATTACHED OUT OF CONCERN FOR ME, YOU ARE MEDDLING, A BUSYBODY AND PRYING INTO MY AFFAIRS IF YOU SPEAK OF THINGS THAT DO NOT CONCERN YOU TO PERSECUTE ME OR IF YOU ENQUIRE ABOUT PERSONAL THINGS FOR WHICH YOU HAVE ULTERIOR MOTIVES.
To say spending a lot of money on variours objects definitely does not show a sign of detachment shows a lack of understanding what attachment is about and it cannot be construed as a statement of concern but it is not only disparaging but disparaging in an intimidating fashion to want the recipient to believe he is definitely attached as a result of spending a lot of money.
It is actually evidence of mad perception or paranoia that he can now still control and suppress but will escape his grasp permanently later that he perceived I was attacking him (otherwise why retaliate when he has been so cordial to me all these while?) when it was an objective communication.
Slander Or Accusing Me Of Hypocrisy:
Unless I have said that I am high standing or I am judgmental you are slandering me to say I am not as high standing as I think I am or you are implying I am a hypocrite by secretly harboring emotions of being high standing.
ACTION SPEAKS LOUDER THAN WORDS. WHO IS MORE STATUS CONSCIOUS OR HIGH STANDING, ME WHO NEVER ENTERTAIN THOUGHT OF REVEALING MY STATUS IN MY EMAIL ADDRESSES OR PEOPLE WHO ‘BY THE WAY’ USE STATUS INFORMING EMAIL ADDRESSES EG dr_xxx@yahoo.com or justice_xxx@yahoo.com?
Because I am not emotional, I am not proud or ashamed of my profession, I have no urge to let anybody know what my profession is and although I was around, I did not attend my graduation ceremony because they are pretentious and against my nature to be low key.
Do not imagine the pope’s life must be Spartan because he has Alpine resorts at his disposal and his food and amenities may be far from humble.
If I sprouted wings on my back and a halo over my head more people will worship me but you think they worship me? They are worshipping my wings and halo. Similarly the pope will be a fool if he thinks people worship him; many are worshipping his position rather than his person just as they worship Jesus because of who they think he is, not what he says.
No Accident: It is not an accident but reflects his forceful or emotional nature that is reflected elsewhere that he used ‘hard look’ when he could have used many alternatives like good, close or careful. Anyone who is forceful or emotional is an actor because force or emotion is never isolated but detain that mind driving it to go against self to act to deceive, please, impress, intimidate (as he has demonstrated by using ‘grave’ doubts and ‘certainly’) and dominate others.
Many like to use shorthand like ‘4’ for ‘for’, ‘u’ for ‘you’ that becomes habitual and they think it is trendy or impressive when it is sinful disrespect for the language, reflects their laissez faire or anything goes attitude and also confuses the reader who sees ‘4’ but must interpret it as ‘for’. In the same way, by using ‘i’ instead ‘I’ and ‘hg’ instead of ‘high’ he is showing disregard for language rules. Many will disagree and only time will tell them whether they are being foolishly stubborn and disrespectful to the language with deadly consequences (Jesus said what you did to the least of me you did it to me) or right that it is just harmless shorthand.
ORDINARY PEOPLE WILL NOT SAY THE THINGS I SAY BECAUSE THOSE THINGS DO NOT OCCUR IN THEIR MINDS AND WHEN THEY HEAR WHAT I SAY THEY ARE OFTEN UNEASY EVEN HOSTILE AND EVEN THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE GOOD AND SMART DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY BECAUSE THEY CONTINUE TO ACT EVEN WHEN NOT TO ACT (NOT TO SMILE, STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS) IS THE PERMANENT WAY OUT OF THE TORMENT OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. IT THEREFORE TAKES AN OUT OF THE ORDINARY PERSON TO SAY WHAT I SAY WHO IN ADDITION CHANGED THE CONSCIOUSNESS OF THE WORLD IN 1977 AND WITH ALMOST CERTAINTY DID THE SAME IN RECENT YEARS. YOU THINK I AM CONCEITED BUT IT MAY BE YOU WHO IS CONCEITED TO THINK YOU ARE MY PEER OR I AM NO BETTER THAN YOU.
Hypocritical & Hypercritical:
Many people react to what is said or has happened with laughter or a ‘ho, ho, ho’ not realizing that although it is not as articulate or extended as my critiques, they are discounting what is said rather than appreciating what is said. They are a hypocrite if they think their ‘ho, ho, ho’ is appreciative when it is discounting or even mocking.
Whatever it is, by mentally or physically expressing ‘ho, ho, ho’ they have passed judgment or criticism of what is said or happened, they have not been uncritical except in their delusion they have not.
WHENEVER ANYONE SMILES OR FROWNS AT WHAT IS SAID OR DONE, THEY ARE PASSING COMMENT POSITIVELY OR NEGATIVELY. OFTEN THE SMILE IS POLITE OR INSINCERE, EVEN BELIES WHAT THEY TRULY THINK AND THAT IS BEING HYPOCRITICAL AND CRITICAL. JUST BECAUSE IT IS BRIEF AND ACCOMPANYING THOUGHTS UNEXPRESSED DOES NOT MAKE IT ANY LESS VALID AS A FORM OF CRITICISM OR HYPOCRISY.
FURTHER, BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE EMOTIONAL OR FORCEFUL PEOPLE, THERE IS ALWAYS FORCE OR EMOTION THAT CAN RISE TO INTENSE LEVELS IN THEIR CRITICISMS OR COMMENTS AND THEY ARE ALWAYS MORE INTENSELY CRITICAL THAN AN UNEMOTIONAL PERSON LIKE ME.
NOWADAYS I DO NOT FROWN OR SMILE AT EVERYTHING OTHERS SAY OR HAPPENS NOT BECAUSE I AM VERY GOOD BUT I DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER, DO NOT WANT TO EXERT FORCE ON MY MIND THAT LIKE A FALLING DOMINO BECOME A NIDUS FOR ESCALATING USE OF MENTAL FORCE. IF YOU THINK I AM HYPOCRITICAL AND HYPERCRITICAL AS THE PERSON WHO CANNOT HELP HIMSELF BUT MUST ALWAYS SMILE OR FROWN, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU MAY BE A FOOL.
SO IT MAY BE NOT JUST A CASE OF THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK BUT IT IS SLANDER FOR THE EMOTIONAL MAN WHO CANNOT HELP REACTING TO ANY SITUATION TO CALL A PERSON WHO IS NOT FORCEFUL, NOT EMOTIONAL, WHO CAN DOES NOT SMILE OR FROWN TO ANY SITUATION, WHO CAN HELP NOT REACTING IS HYPERCRITICAL AND HYPOCRITICAL.
THE BUDDHA AND JESUS WERE SCOFFED AT TOO:
People have scoffed at the Buddha (as recorded below) and Jesus in their presence so what makes you think that you know Jesus or the Buddha and will not similarly scoff at them in their presence?
Scoffing is never driven by goodwill but it is always driven by ill will to disparage and whoever harbors ill will is not headed for heaven but the opposite direction because as the Buddha said you must have loving kindness. It is far fetched to think what he said about me with the liberal use of emotive and strong words reflected loving kindness:
"Here, bhikkhus, a certain person abides with his heart imbued with loving-kindness extending over one quarter, the second, the third, the fourth quarter, and so above, below, everywhere, and to all as to himself; he abides with his heart abundant, exalted, measureless in loving-kindness, without hostility or ill-will, extending over the all-encompassing world.
"He finds gratification in that, and looks to it for his well-being; steady and resolute thereon, and if he dies without losing it, he reappears among the gods of a High Divinity's retinue.
***
2. Sunakkhatta, had recently left this Dhamma and Discipline. He was making this statement before the Vesali assembly: "The recluse Gotama does not have any superhuman states, any distinction in knowledge and vision worthy of the noble ones.
3. Then, Sariputta went into Vesali for alms. Then he heard Sunakkhatta making this statement before the Vesali assembly.
4. (The Blessed One said:) "Sariputta, the misguided man is angry. Thinking to discredit the Tathagata, he actually praises him; for it is a praise of the Tathagata to say of him: 'When he teaches the Dhamma to anyone, it leads him when he practises it to the complete destruction of suffering.'
ALREADY WELL SEIZED:
I AM QUITE CERTAIN NOW THAT EVEN IF THEY WANTED, MOST ACTORS ARE HELPLESS OR UNABLE TO STOP THEMSELVES LAUGHING, TO NOT STRETCH SYLLABLES LET ALONE NOT CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS BECAUSE THE FORCE DRIVING THESE ACTIVITIES ARE TOO POWERFUL FOR THEM TO RESIST AND BECAUSE THEY CAN STILL SUPPRESS THEM NOW, THEY THINK THEY WILL ALWAYS MANAGE. THEY ARE ALREADY TRAPPED, TORMENTED BY SERIOUS STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTIBILITY AND WAITING TO COMPLETE THEIR SENTENCE NOW AND HEREAFTER.
THE REASON WHY PEOPLE CANNOT STOP THEMSELVES STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES AND ACCELERATING IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THROUGH THEIR STRETCHED SYLLABLES IS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT IN CONTROL OF THEMSELVES BUT THEY ARE ALREADY WELL SEIZED BY THEIR RESIDENT MENTAL FORCE AND ITS PROXIES THE EMOTIONS THAT THEY HOLD DEAR TO HELPLESSLY DO SO.
THEY DO NOT REALIZE THAT IF THEY DO NOT MAKE EFFORT TO FREQUENTLY MEDITATE TO CALM THEMSELVES DOWN & INSTIL STILLNESS, MAKE DEDICATED EFFORT TO PAY ATTENTION TO STOP STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES AND CHANGING SPEED & LOUDNESS, THERE ARE EVEN NOW CONTINUING TO CONDITION THEMSELVES TO STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS THAT WILL LEAD TO FINAL MAD STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS.
***
Blow faster both gradually and rapidly into a flute and hear the pitch differences and if you cannot detect similar pitch changes whenever people stretch their syllables you have poor discernment. If you can detect the pitch changes and you think nothing wrong, you think it is necessary and pleasing, you are a great fool and pervert and deserve to suffer and go mad if that is the only destination of such speed changes.
Next blow gradually and then suddenly with more force to hear the differences in loudness in the musical note.
Effort must always be made and energy consumed to create stress, restlessness and distraction whenever one changes speed or increase loudness and it is totally unnecessary except to be falsely charming. It is actually not pleasing but a pain to the ear creating stress, restlessness and distraction to the listener.
No one throughout the ages have pointed this out to you and not to stretch syllables, not to change speed and loudness is the only way out permanently of stress, restlessness and distraction and if for whatever reason you fail to act on it then you deserve your lot if it is eternal punishment.
No Blood Found:
Falconio’s blood was not found on his van so the body must have been carried in the gunman’s 4WD. Bearing in mind he is a simpleton who even publicly said the police were after him (perhaps because friends told him he looked like the gunman), it is unlikely that he will so thorough clean his vehicle so that no trace of blood or hair was ever found. Not only has he to load a heavy body in but he has to load it out and it is amazing he spilt not one drop of blood or scrape some skin or hair off even if the head was covered by cloth and he cleaned it so obsessively no trace was ever found.
The judge was wise in telling the jury not to convict Murdoch because he was a drug smuggler and not to be influenced by emotion (Falconio’s mother walked off court at suggestions against his son) but he is foolish, asking to be judged unnecessarily when he told the jury they were correct in convicting him. It is none of his business to say so and if it turns out to be wrong, he will be judged himself.
Even Falconio’s parents are guilty of sin in being emotional and walking off court as if distressed that may influence the jury.
***
The rate of melting of glaciers at both poles is much faster than scientifically predicted and may be accelerating or get even faster.
Greenland glacier races to ocean
Scientists have been monitoring what they say may be the fastest moving glacier on the planet.
Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier on the east coast of Greenland has been clocked using GPS equipment and satellites to be flowing at a rate of 14km per year.
It is also losing mass extremely fast, with its front end retreating 5km back up its fjord this year alone.
The glacier "drains" about 4% of the ice sheet, dumping tens of cubic km of fresh water in the North Atlantic.
This gives it significant influence not just on global sea level rise but on the system of ocean circulation which drives through the Arctic.
"We've seen a 5km retreat of the terminus, we've see an almost 300% acceleration in the flow speed and we've seen about a 100m thinning of the glacier - all occurring in the last one or so years.
"These are very dramatic changes." And they are not confined to Kangerdlugssuaq.
Helheim Glacier, just to the south of Kangerdlugssuaq, is flowing only slightly slower at 12km per year.
Hamilton thinks a couple of factors may be triggering the quick melt.
The observed recent increase in summer surface melting on the Greenland Ice Sheet is producing large quantities of liquid water which, if it percolates down to the base of the glacier, can lubricate its flow over rocks towards the ocean.
And if that same warming is bringing higher-temperature sea waters into contact with the front of Kangerdlugssuaq and Helheim, this could explain their rapid retreat.
If other large glaciers in the region are seen to go the same way, it could begin to "pull the plug" on Greenland, said Dr Hamilton.
"The model predictions for sea level rise do not include the effects of rapid changes in ice dynamics," he added.
" the predictions for both the rate and the timing for sea level rise in the next few decades will be largely underestimated."

Geologists witness 'ocean birth'
By Roland Pease BBC science unit, San Francisco
Scientists say they have witnessed the possible birth of a future ocean basin growing in southern Ethiopia.
The team watched an 8m rift develop in the ground in just three weeks in the Afar desert region last September.
It is one small step in a long-term split that is tearing the east of the country from the rest of Africa and should eventually create a huge sea.
The UK-Ethiopian group says it was astonished at the speed with which the 60km-long fissure developed.
"It's the first large event we've seen like this in a rift zone since the advent of some of the space-based techniques we're now using, and which give us a resolution and a detail to see what's really going on and how the earth processes work; it's amazing," said Cindy Ebinger, from Royal Holloway University of London.
Researchers have long recognised that the Afar region, an inhospitable depression in southern Ethiopia, has been contorted by similar forces in recent geological time.
But the event in September is said to be unprecedented in scientific history.
It began with a large earthquake on the 14th of the month and continued with a swarm of moderate tremors.
Start and stop
"About a week into the sequence, there was a volcanic eruption," explained Dr Ebinger.
"A lot of ash was thrown up in the air, and a lot of cracks appeared in the ground; some of which were more than a metre wide.
"Using satellite techniques we can see ground deformation, and about a month after the sequence, we could see a 60km long section had opened up, and it opened up about 8m in its central part.
"It appears that we've seen the birth of an ocean basin."
The movements of September are only a small part of what would be needed to create a whole ocean - the complete process takes millions of years - and in other regions of the planet, ocean development has been started only to stall at a later time.
Record Drought Cripples Life Along the Amazon
By LARRY ROHTER
The Amazon River basin, the world's largest rain forest, is grappling with a devastating drought that is the worst since record keeping began a century ago. It has evaporated whole lagoons and kindled forest fires, killed off fish and crops, stranded boats and the villagers who travel by them, brought disease and wreaked economic havoc.
"There have been years before in which we've had a deficit of rainfall, but we've never experienced drops in the water levels of rivers like those we have seen in 2005,". "It has truly been without precedent, and it looks like it is only going to be December or January, if then, that things return to normal."
Scientists say the drought is most likely a result of the same rise in water temperatures in the tropical Atlantic Ocean that unleashed Hurricane Katrina. They also worry that if global warming is involved, it may be the beginning of a new era of more severe and frequent droughts in the region that accounts for nearly a quarter of the world's fresh water.
"We have no idea of the game we have played into by running this worldwide experiment of pumping so much greenhouse gases into the atmosphere," Mr. Nepstad said.
"I am very frightened," said Jair Souto, the mayor of a sleepy market town, Manaquiri.
In Acre State in western Brazil, parched trees turned to tinder, and the number of forest fires recorded tripled to nearly 1,500 at its peak in September compared with a year earlier.
On the Madeira River navigation had to be suspended when water levels fell to barely one-tenth of their rainy season level. Peasant farmers have watched their crops rot because they cannot ship them to market.
"The water level wasn't but two fingers high, and the channel was choked in the grass that sprang up, so you couldn't even paddle a canoe". "With the fish all dead and our watermelon and banana crop all rotted, we'd be starving if it weren't for the food packages the government brings."
As water levels dropped, areas where the river normally flowed free instead became stagnant pools, the ideal breeding ground for mosquitoes.
A vast majority of communities rely on the river to carry away human waste. With sewage now accumulating near the settlements, the risk of cholera and other diseases is expected to rise with water levels when the rainy season.
Whether the increases in deforestation registered in the Amazon in recent years have also played a role is less clear.
But river-dwellers old enough to remember the era before deforestation began on a large scale say that the cutting down of trees along rivers and lakes has aided in the accumulation of silt. As a result, they say, navigation channels that remained open even in the most severe of previous dry seasons are now blocked and choked.
Research also suggests that the forest itself, and consequently the entire ecosystem, has been made more vulnerable by the drought. When deprived of an adequate ration of rainfall, trees instead drain water from the soil and curb the growth of their trunks, which are vital to their role in pulling immense quantities of carbon dioxide out of the air.
"Because droughts remain registered in the soil for up to four years, the situation is still very critical and precarious, and will remain so," Mr. Nepstad said. Where there are "forests already teetering on the edge," he added, the prospect of "massive tree mortality and greater susceptibility to fire" must be considered.
While scientists largely agree that higher temperatures in the Atlantic are responsible for the severity of this year's drought, they are still searching for an explanation for that phenomenon. It could be just a one-time disturbance, or it could be more permanent, perhaps brought on by greenhouse gas emissions.
"Yes, a global warming effect would explain increases in ocean temperatures, but no one is saying that yet, because it is still very early, and we don't yet have enough data," said Carlos Nobre, director of Brazil's National Institute of Space Research, which monitors climatic patterns in the Amazon. "Droughts like this one are very rare, but one consequence of a warmer planet would be that they occur with more frequency, which is something we are going to have to be watching for."