Say & Do What You Like

SAY & DO WHAT YOU LIKE:

Quote: I disagree with what you say. I smile because I like the person.

SAY AND DO WHAT YOU LIKE, DISAGREE WITH EVERYTHING I SAY BUT MAKE SURE THERE IS NO STRETCHING OF YOUR SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION, NO CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE (LOUDNESS) WHEN YOU SAY OR DO IT.

IF THERE ARE, ENERGY MUST BE CONSUMED TO ACCOMPLISH THEM THAT WILL EXHAUST YOU, FORCE THAT OTHERWISE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN, MUST BE APPLIED ON YOUR MIND TO STRESS IT & THIS FORCE CAN BE FELT BY ALL OTHERS TO ALSO STRESS THEM, THE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY FORCEFUL CHANGES IN SPEED & STRENGTH OF FORCE WILL INDUCE RESTLESSNESS IN YOU AND OTHERS YOU INTERACT WITH, THE SIMULTANEOUS SUBSTANCE (WHAT YOU SAY OR DO) AND STYLE (STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND FORCE) WILL DIVIDE YOUR ATTENTION AND THAT OF OTHERS. FURTHER BECAUSE WHATEVER IS FORCEFUL CONDITIONS, YOUR MIND WILL BECOME PROGRESSIVELY CONDITIONED TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN RISE RAPIDLY TO INTENSE LEVELS THAT BECOME HARDER TO SHAKE OFF, YOU ARE HEADED FOR MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION APART FROM DESTROYING YOUR MIND. BECAUSE THIS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO IS NEVER LIVE BUT REGURGITATED BY ROTE, YOU WILL SUCCUMB TO MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR AND SPEECH.

WHETHER YOU CAN SEE OR NOT THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN YOUR SPEECH, IF IT IS PRESENT, YOU MUST SUFFER AND MAKE OTHERS WHO INTERACT WITH YOU SUFFER FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND IF YOU THINK YOU ARE BLAMELESS, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR MAKING A MONUMENTAL ERROR.

YOU ARE A SHOWMAN BECAUSE THE CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY AND HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND ARE DESIGNED FOR STYLE OR SHOW.

THERE IS NOTHING TO GAIN IN AGREEING OR DISAGREEING WITH WHAT I SAY BECAUSE WHAT I SAY IS A MATTER FOR DISCERNMENT. WHAT MATTERS IS WHETHER YOU CAN SEE YOU CONSTANTLY STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND HOW THESE ARE INFALLIBLY LINKED TO THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT YOU MUST SURELY EXPERIENCE.

IF THERE IS NOTHING MORE CRUCIAL THAN WHAT I SAY ABOVE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS SPOKE OF MUST ALSO SAY IT. IF I HAVE ALREADY SAID IT WHERE NO MAN IN THE PAST AND TODAY WILL SAY, THEN I WILL HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM OR RENDERED WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE.


Why smiling because you like someone is false logic:

When you rebuke me to say that you smile because you like someone you are implying that your smile is genuine, good for yourself and others because you like him or it is based on liking, not as I contend that smiling is to falsely please, impress or intimidate others.

You say your smile is based on liking but because liking is not exclusive to good people, nasty people also like and the liking in “good” and bad people are the same, there is nothing intrinsically good or true about liking and your smiling that is based on liking is therefore not based on something that is true or good. Because ‘good’ people are in truth poisonously nice to others, they too are bad and therefore all bad people like.
Although people who like some (and therefore must dislike others that they may struggle to conceal behind a smile) may disagree or cannot see it is so, liking is never based on reason or logic but liking is always blind, forceful and based on mental force or emotion.
Liking or attraction for something is like magnetism, it is magnetic force not magnetic reasoning or choice that draws iron fillings to a magnet.
Not only is liking powered by force that is never maintained at constant speed and strength in ordinary people but this forceful liking always accelerates in strength and speed to accentuate the stress, restlessness and distraction in whoever who likes that can also be experienced by the target of his liking.
It is possible to like something or someone with minimal constant force and speed that minimizes the stress, restlessness and distraction but it is never seen on earth.
If you must like some things you must also dislike other things otherwise what is the point of liking or speaking of liking everything? If you like everything in this world eg shit as well as food, you must be insane. The truly sane way is not to like food nor dislike shit. You know one is pleasant and another is unpleasant, you appreciate that food is pleasant and shit is unpleasant but you are not driven to (emotionally) like food or (emotionally) dislike shit.
Just because you like me does not mean that you are good to me or good but precisely because you (emotionally) like me you are driven by blind force to ignore stress to forcefully exaggerate and falsify in order to express your liking, to ignore the rising stress to forcefully express your charming smile to impress me.
It is because people are emotional attracted to some people for some reason (eg pretty or handsome, he talks like a guru, he is an authority figure) that they will force themselves to express themselves to convey their liking to please or impress the other person.
Whether your liking that is expressed in your smiling is beneficial to yourself and the other person can be OBJECTIVELY established. If it is in truth going against yourself, you will afterwards experience stress, restlessness and distraction that you must struggle to shake off.
Love Is Not To Be Confused With Liking:
Jesus did not say that if you LIKE me you will obey what I command but he said if you LOVE me, you will obey what I command.
Therefore you are not meritorious to say "I smile because I like someone" but you are unwittingly acknowledging your sinfulness and foolishness. Would you dare correct yourself to say "I smile because I love someone"?
Although reflecting their confused thoughts ordinary people regularly interchange love and liking, love and liking are very different things that are not to be confused one for another. Love has nothing to do with liking and they are two very different things.
Liking is emotional attraction that though ordinary people may insist are based on loftier ideals is merely based on physical characteristics (beauty, nice smell of perfume, nice taste) and all ordinary people who are poisonously nice not good and overtly evil people like so there is nothing intrinsically good in liking but instead seized by forceful liking, people might throw caution to the wind and commit all kinds of evil to satisfy their liking (like smile falsely to show their like), whilst love is the calm clearly thinking intention to respect & be concerned for the welfare of the target and not say or do anything to harm or hurt it.
IT IS FALSE LOGIC THAT WILL END IN MAD LOGIC (IRRECONCILABLE IRRATIONALITY) TO IMPLY THAT ONE’S SMILING THAT IS BASED ON ONE'S LIKING IS GENUINE AND GOOD BECAUSE LIKING IS NOTHING MORE THAN A BLIND ATTRACTIVE MENTAL FORCE TARGETTED AT SENSORY OBJECTS (VISUAL, SOUND, SMELL, TOUCH, TASTE) THAT APPLIES FORCE THAT STRESSES THE MIND AND WHOSE FORCE CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO THE TARGET TO SIMILARLY CAUSE HIM STRESS THAT THE PERSON WHO LIKES WILLFULLY CHOOSES TO IGNORE UNTIL ITS SUFFERING IS TOO STRONG TO IGNORE IN THE NAME OF SENSATE GRATIFICATION AND THEREFORE BECAUSE LIKING IMPARTS THE SEVERE SIDE EFFECT OF STRESS ON THE PERSON AND HIS TARGET, IT IS HARMFUL AND SMILING THAT IS BASED ON LIKING IS BASED ON SOMETHING THAT IS HARMFUL AND THEREFORE SMILING ITSELF IS SIMILARLY HARMFUL, BECAUSE NO GOOD CAN COME OUT OF EVIL.
THE LOVING KINDNESS THAT THE BUDDHA SPEAKS OF AS THE KEY TO HEAVEN AND THE ‘LOVING HIM’ THAT JESUS SPEAKS ABOUT MUST NOT BE CONFUSED WITH EMOTIONAL LIKING. LOVING KINDNESS IS A FULLY COMPREHENDING CALM CLEARLY THINKING REASONED INTENTION TO NEVER HARM OTHERS WHATEVER THE PROVOCATION, TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT CLEARLY BENEFITS OTHERS, NOT A BLIND FORCEFUL ATTRACTION FOR SENSORY OBJECTS.
(Loving kindness is when you don’t laugh or look down at others, don’t speak sarcastically, don’t pester others and you slow down so as not to knock down a cat rushing across the road. Loving kindness has nothing to do with emotional liking and disliking)
Love is not speaking harshly and you can only speak harshly if there is violent stretching, violent acceleration in speed and loudness of what you say and what you say is hurtful.
You may say what I say is harsh but if what I said is without stretching, changes in speed and loudness, is true but unpalatable to you, it is your sinful emotions that can be stirred by what I say that hurts you, you are wrong to blame me. It is not my fault that you are a slave to emotions you cannot give up. Because I am not emotional, what people say cannot hurt me like they did in the past.
Be careful if you accuse me of being nasty, critical of others. If what I say is the unpalatable truth that you cannot accept, that hurts you because you are a sinner with emotions that can be stirred by what I say, you are accusing me wrongly and adding karma to yourself.
BECAUSE SMILING IS FORCEFUL AND SEPARATE FROM LIKING THOUGH IT MAY ISSUE FROM LIKING, IT CAN BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER TARGETS SO THAT IN TIME THE PERSON WHO FORCEFULLY SMILES BECAUSE HE LIKES WILL DEGENERATE TO SMILE WHEN HE DISLIKES OR FEELS NOTHING EVEN IF HE STRIVES TO AVOID THAT. IF YOU THINK YOU SOLELY SMILE BASED ON LIKING, IT MAY BE TRUE OR YOU ARE DELUDED WITH SERIOUS CONSEQUENCE IN ULTIMATE MADNESS. THUS ALTHOUGH IT MAY BE INITIALLY BE TRUE (QUESTIONABLE) THAT YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE SOMEONE, IN TIME, WITH CONSIDERABLE SOCIAL PRESSURES, YOU START TO SMILE TO DECEIVE.
Why is it that people dare speak against me but they dare not speak against Jesus? It is not because they can see the truth that there is in what Jesus said (although they believe they can) but it is because they have faith in who Jesus is and dare not speak against him for fear of punishment but they cannot see or refuse to accept the truth of what I say and they think they know who I am and I am a nobody in their eyes that they dare to speak against me. If I can be compared to the stone that the builders rejected, then it may become the capstone and he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him.
In the past it may not be important that people do not know what Jesus said that those who spoke against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven because He was not around to be spoken against. But if the counselor is a being who will come as Jesus said he will and he will speak, Jesus is warning you that when he comes and should you choose to speak against him in your foolishness and arrogance, you will not be forgiven.
The wise never speak against anybody. I am only pointing out the errors of others, not speaking against them. If you emotionally disparage me, you use your words to attack me, you are speaking against me.
One wrong leads to another wrong:
Wrong without remorse and corrective action as a result of that remorse never leads to right but one wrong always leads to another wrong so that in time the fool strays so far from truth he cannot see head or tail of his quagmire.
If it is true as I say that contrary to the popular perception, liking is forceful, false, blind, stresses and induces restlessness and distraction in the person and his recipient, is it any surprise that what is false and stressful (liking) leads to another wrong or stressful entity(smiling)?
It is impossible that something that is false and stressful should lead to something that is true and stress free but it should lead to another thing that is also false and stressful and so rather than justifying your smile you are unwittingly affirming that your smile is false and harmful just as your liking too is false and harmful.
It is because of your original error or delusion that liking is good for yourself and others that led to your second error that your smiling is similarly good for yourself and others and therefore you feel justified to say “I smile because I like someone” implying that your smile and liking are both based on truth or what is good for you and others.
Why it is dangerous to say you smile because you like someone:

If you are often unaware you are smiling when you do so, that smile cannot be consciously intended because you like him but it is produced impersonally by rote from memory and therefore not intended as you say because you like a person.

You cannot intend something (smiling and liking) if you are not aware you are doing it.

So unless on every occasion you are mindful that you are smiling because you like the person, what you say is false. Should you smile without awareness you are smiling or that you like the person, on that occasion that smile is not because you like the person but by mindless rote and you have told a lie to say you only smile because you like a person.

In reality it is impossible that ordinary people smile because they like the person because there is always a simultaneous substance and style in their smile that cannot be rendered live but must be prerecorded and played back as constituted. Further, ordinary people always do many things at the same time eg smile whilst they talk or do something and the smile therefore cannot be totally conscious, is often not even partially conscious but TOTALLY unconscious.

There is such a thing called a substance only smile that is never seen in this world that can be defined as a smile without added force, without stretching or prolonging (to impress), without changes in speed or strength of force and only this smile can be produced live intended for the observer.

There is another thing called a substance and style smile that in keeping with all the other activities of people who are actors, are a combination of substance (the smile) and the added force, added stretching, changes in speed and strength of force that are totally unnecessary but necessary to impress or please others, that impart forceful changes on the mind to create stress, restlessness and distraction not just in the person who smiles but also the recipient. This substance and style smile can NEVER be produced live but must be memorized and rendered by rote triggered by occasions that the person is vulnerable to smile helplessly.


WHETHER YOUR SMILE IS FULLY INTENDED BY YOUR LIKING & THEREFORE ACCOMPANIED BY ATTENTION OR NOT, HAS ADDED FORCE WITH STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED OR FORCE OR NOT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED, IS NOT BECAUSE I SAY SO AND IF IT IS UNCONSCIOUS, HAS STYLE THEN IT IS UNINTENDED BY STANDARDIZED ROTE AND YOU HAVE SAID FALSELY THAT YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON.

PEOPLE WITH SUBSTANCE AND STYLE SMILES MIGHT LIKE TO THINK THEY ARE MASTERS OF THEIR SMILES BUT THEY ARE SLAVES WHO HELPLESSLY SMILE WHEN THE SITUATION THAT TRIGGER SMILING OCCURS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE URGE TO SMILE THAT THEY CAN OCCASIONALLY FORCEFULLY SUPPRESS BUT THEY HAVE NEVER ELIMINATED. BECAUSE THEY ARE REACTORS, SLAVES RATHER THAN MASTERS OF THEIR SMILES AND IN ADDITION THEY BELIEVE IN THEIR SMILES, THEY HAVE NEVER TASTED THE STATE OF HAVING NO URGE TO SMILE AND THEY UNRIGHTEOUSLY DISPARAGE IT WHEN THEY HAVEN'T TASTED IT.

I HAVE EXPERIENCED BOTH THE PREVIOUS STATE OF SMILING TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS BELIEVING IT IS BENEFICIAL TO ME AND OTHERS AND THE PRESENT STATE WHERE I HAVE TRULY NO URGE OR DESIRE TO SMILE AND THINK IT IS EVIL TO SELF AND OTHERS AND I KNOW THERE IS A DAY AND NIGHT DIFFERENCE IN THE FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
(THERE ARE SOME WHO MAY KID THEMSELVES THEY HAVE NO URGE TO SMILE WHEN THEY STILL HARBOR THE URGE AND THEREFORE HAVE NOT EXPERIENCED THE DIFFERENCE IN NOT SMILING)

I DO NOT HAVE THE URGE TO SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE THE PERSON AND I NOT ONLY DO NOT BELIEVE SMILING IS GOOD FOR MYSELF AND OTHERS BUT IT IS DETRIMENTAL.

NOT ONLY DO YOU HARBOR STRONG COMPELLING URGES TO SMILE, BUT YOU BELIEVE YOUR SMILE IS GOOD FOR YOURSELF AND OTHERS. IS IT ANY SURPRISE YOU NEVER SHED YOUR URGE TO SMILE?

Do you stretch, change speed and force in your smile because you like the person?
You may say you smile solely because you like someone but do you stretch your smile, change speed and strength of force during your smile because you like the person? If not then they are false accompaniments to impress others with your smile.

Just because you like to smile because you like someone does not mean you must ALWAYS (not sometimes) stretch it, change speed and strength of force but you always do so because it is unconscious and standardized.

If in truth there is ALWAYS (not sometimes) stretching, changes in speed and strength of force in your smile that I can demonstrate to you and you are not even aware of them, how could they be intended but instead they are unconscious, blindly across board reproduced from memory. If it is live for the occasion then surely there are occasions that you smile without changing speed or strength of force.

The stretching, changes in speed and loudness in your smile is totally unnecessary, consumes energy and applies force on your mind to create stress, restlessness and distraction, is intended for show, not because you like the person (YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON BUT SURELY YOU DON'T CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE SMILING BECAUSE YOU LIKE THE PERSON BUT TO IN ADDITION FALSELY IMPRESS HIM HOW MARVELLOUS YOUR SMILE IS), but to falsely impress him.

Even though the recipient cannot tell and he even expresses gratefulness for your smile, he can experience your smile as well as the stretching, changes in speed and strength of force whose effect is to divide his attention between the substance and the style of your smile, incite restlessness and stress him.

WHETHER THERE IS STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN YOUR SMILE CAN BE OBJECTIVELY ASCERTAINED.

NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY SAY IT IS NECESSARY TO SMILE LIKE YOU ALWAYS DO WITH CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE, THESE CHANGES ARE UNNECESSARY AND FALSELY INTENDED TO IMPRESS, THEY CONSUME ENERGY AND CREATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN YOURSELF AND THE TARGET PERSON, OBLIGES HIM TO RETURN YOUR SMILE EVEN THOUGH HE IS INDISPOSED AND THEREFORE IS HARMFUL THAN VIRTUOUS.

No Right To Comment Let Alone Disagree Or Praise:
My message to everyone in a nutshell is:
Pay attention to make effort to stop stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness because it (and its equivalents in motion, thought and perception) is the only source of stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset the person that will not may turn increasingly malignant to become ultimately mad stress, restlessness and distraction.
If you think that you can speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and I can demonstrate to you that you are constantly stretching your syllables, changing speed and loudness, then you are both blind (cannot see you do so) and deluded (you believe what is false eg that you don’t stretch syllables is true) and must suffer because stress, restlessness and distraction are mandatory to anyone who constantly stretches his syllables, changes speed and loudness. If you think that being blind and deluded you are nevertheless headed for heaven you may right or foolish.
If you can see yourself stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and you haven’t tried its alternative, not stretching, changing speed and loudness, you have no right to dismiss it just as you have no right to say a car is lousy without testing it.
It is because people do not know they severely underestimate the extent of the stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness present in their speech and that of everyone else’s that they think they are qualified to comment on the matter. It is because people do not realize that they have never tried truly not stretching their syllables, not changing speed and loudness and therefore never tasted its fruit which is freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction that they think they are qualified to dismiss what I say when they have no right to comment or dismiss.
Until you are reasonably proficient in recognizing stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness, you have no right to comment on the matter and what I say, until you have successful tried not stretching your syllables, not changing speed and loudness you cannot dismiss what I say.
The reasons why people do so despite having no right is because they are presumptuous, arrogant and derisive. They presume they know what I am talking about when they don’t. They think they know everything, they know what is good for them when they don’t. They look down on the significance of not stretching, not changing speed and loudness thinking it is worthless when it is the most important thing in life because it is the key to freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction that was previously unattainable, inconceivable.
You have a right to comment on or discuss a topic if you know a topic. You are right to comment on Indian cooking if you have interest in it and know it reasonably.
You have a right to dismiss or praise something if you have tried and found it worthless or meritorious. If you have not tried something you have no right to dismiss or praise it. You have the right to dismiss a dish if you have tasted it but you have no right to dismiss it without tasting it.
I say confidently that no one has the right to comment let alone disagree with my assertion that there are constant stretching of syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness in the speech of everyone in this world and they are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that they must suffer from and induce in others and if they do not desist they are headed for a certain appointment with mad uncontrollable stress, restlessness and distraction (daze) unless death supervenes.
And I further say confidently that I have the right to comment on the topic because I know precisely every instance anyone stretches his syllables, changed speed and loudness, I have the right to praise and recommend not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness because I can switch mode between stretching and not stretching, between changing speed and loudness and not, to experience the unmistakable absence of stress, restlessness and distraction that accompanies not stretching, not changing speed and loudness.
If anyone should comment let alone dispute or disagree he is speaking un-righteously and headed for judgment.
What I say above is not based on arrogance or intolerance but based on perfect logic.
A person is only qualified to speak on a topic if he has interest and knows the topic quite well. If you have no interest in or does not know the topic well you are not qualified to comment and if you do you are sticking your neck out foolishly.
A person is only qualified to dispute or disagree with something if he has personally successfully tried what is suggested and found it to be worthless or harmful. If he has never tried it and he disputes it, he is speaking without righteousness and sticking his neck out for judgment.
Just as a person has no right to disagree with a topic if he had not tried it, he also has no right to APPLAUD OR PRAISE it if he has not tried it otherwise his praise is false or insincere flattery.
If you are interested in and know quite well the matter about stretching syllables, changes in speed and loudness, you should be able to demonstrate to me how distinctively different your speech and those around you sounds like without stretching, changes in speed and loudness. If you cannot show me how not stretching, not changing speed and loudness sounds like you do not know and are not interested in them and have no right to comment on them.
I have yet to come across someone who can tell me coherently how they have stretched syllables, changed speed and loudness even when they are audibly doing so all the time. Therefore all ordinary people are not interested, are not conversant about stretching of syllables, change in speed and loudness and have no right to comment.
I know people have difficulty seeing how they stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness and are further largely powerless to stop themselves doing so because when I demonstrate to people how they have just stretched their syllables, just changed speed or loudness, their BLANK, WITHDRAWN, LOOKING AWAY (BLINKING, EYES DARTING AWAY), UNCOMFORTABLE reaction visible in their facial expressions and eyes shows me they are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with what I am saying, they have resistance to or difficulty absorbing what I am trying to convey to them and after I have demonstrated to them they nevertheless continue to speak in their usual ways as if they are inflexible tape recorders.
It is no accident they have difficulty seeing but there is a very strong willfully emotional refusal or aversion to see precisely how they are hurting themselves and others namely by stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness. Until you are mad nobody knowingly kills himself. It is because stress, restlessness and distraction are never fun but always deadly, nobody who knows, can see clearly the connection between his conduct and his stress, restlessness and distraction will permit himself to kill himself. It is only because they have turned a very strong blind eye not to see that they are constantly stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness such that they now even believe in delusion that the way they sound when they speak which nothing more than their individual ways of using force to constantly stretch their syllables, changed speed and loudness is charming, benefits themselves and others when it is a deadly killer.
The reason why they are largely powerless to stop is because the way they speak is driven by very powerful mental force from a mental jukebox that they must first stop and then pay attention to fabricate speech without stretching, changing speed and loudness.
You can only dispute what I say as worthless if you have successfully tried what I recommend for a reasonable period. If you have never tried it you have no right to dispute what I say.
You are a bigot and foolish to dismiss a car as worthless if you have never driven it.
If you have successfully tried out what I have said you must surely be able to demonstrate to me how your speech will otherwise sound if you did not stretch any syllable, changed any speed or loudness (something I can demonstrate whatever the speech involved). Because I have yet to come across a person who can speak without stretching his syllables, without changing speed and loudness even to this day, even amongst all those who have read what I have said many times, they are not qualified to dispute what I say and are asking for judgment disputing something that nobody today or throughout the ages has said. If there are no other ways out of the prison of stress, restlessness and distraction, by foolishly rejecting it you are unwittingly affirming your desire to continue even for another eternity in the prison of endless unremitting senseless stress, restlessness and distraction.
By contrast I am fully qualified to both comment and praise or recommend not stretching of syllables, not changing speed and loudness because I can at will speak mindfully with or without stretching, with or without changing speed and loudness and experience the presence and absence of stress, restlessness and distraction that respectively attend.
Anyone who has successfully tried not stretching syllables, not changing speed and loudness will have experienced a never before experienced incomparable effortless release from stress, restlessness and distraction to not dispute what I say.
Finally, because I have experienced it for myself the difference between previously constantly mindlessly stretching my syllables, changing speed and loudness with its attendant tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction and now mindfully not stretching, changing speed and loudness and its exquisite freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction, I can further experience stress, restlessness and distraction building up in me if I deliberately stretched my syllables, changed speed and loudness to demonstrate to others, I know without doubt THAT NOBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO DISPUTE WHAT I SAY THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CONSTANT CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF EVERYONE AND THEY ARE THE ONLY SOURCES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST TORMENT THEM AND UNLESS THEY DESIST THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
HOW CAN ANYONE COMMENT ON OR DISCUSS INDIAN COOKING WHEN HE DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING OR KNOWS LITTLE ABOUT INDIAN COOKING? IF YOU THINK YOU KNOW STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO POINT OUT TO ME MANY OF THE INSTANCES WHEN THEY OCCUR IN YOUR AND OTHERS’ SPEECH.
HOW CAN ANYONE DISMISS NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS AS WORTHLESS WHEN HE HASN’T EVEN SUCCESSFULLY TRIED IT? IF YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TRIED THEM HOW COME YOU CANNOT JUST ONCE DEMONSTRATE TO ME HOW YOUR SPEECH WILL SOUND DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT IF YOU NEVER STRETCHED ANY SYLLABLE, CHANGED SPEED OR LOUDNESS? IF YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY TRIED IT YOU WOULD HAVE EXPERIENCED A NEVER BEFORE EXPERIENCED FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION TO NEVER REVERT TO CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
ANYONE WHO PAID CAREFUL ATTENTION CAN & WILL HEAR HOW DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT OR UNMISTAKABLE SPEECH WITH AND WITHOUT STRETCHED SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS SOUNDS LIKE. AND JUST AS THEY ARE DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT IN SOUND, THE END RESULT OR FRUITS NAMELY INSOLUBLE MOUNTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION OR THEIR ABSENCE ARE DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT OR UNMISTAKABLE.
Secretly Foretelling:
If Jesus wanted everyone to know he was foretelling the coming of a counselor, he would have said it to all his disciples and they would have reported it in all the versions of the gospels. It is because Jesus wanted to secretly foretell the coming of a counselor that he chose John as his conduit and scattered his references to make it less obvious.
If Jesus wanted readers to know with certainty that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and whoever speaks against the counselor will not be forgiven then he would have said that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and whoever speaks against the counselor will not be forgiven.
It is because Jesus did not want readers to know precisely what he was referring to that he chose to say in the passing that the counselor is the Holy Spirit and elsewhere instead of saying whoever spoke against the counselor will not be forgiven, he chose to say whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven.
Speaking against the Holy Spirit cannot be personal or directed at his person because that would be upholding his style but it would be speaking against what he has to say. If what the Holy Spirit has to say is the way out of suffering that you will never discover by yourself and you repudiate it then it is understandable why you should not be forgiven.
Jesus’ Warning To Christians:
Who are the people who read the New Testament?
It is largely if not entirely Christians who read or scrutinize or study it regularly apart from casual passing interest by the curious.
Therefore in saying that whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven either in this Age or the Age to come and indirectly saying elsewhere that the counselor is the Holy Spirit, Jesus may be giving a warning to Christians or those who read the New Testament seriously that they will not be forgiven if they spoke against the Holy Spirit, whoever He is. It makes no difference to the masses who do not or refuse to read the New Testament because they are given to this world. You can only address and treat who turn to you for aid, not those who see no wrong or seek no aid.
"Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter; but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin"-- for they had said, "He has an unclean spirit."
Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.

IT MAY BE THAT IN SPEAKING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, JESUS IS SPEAKING OF SOMETHING OR SOMEONE THAT NOBODY CAN KNOW FOR SURE OR IT MAY BE THAT IN SPEAKING OF THE COUNSELOR AS THE HOLY SPIRIT AND WHOEVER SPEAKS AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN JESUS IS GIVING WARNING TO THOSE WHO READ THE NEW TESTAMENT (DE FACTO CHRISTIANS) THAT THEY WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN IF THEY SPOKE AGAINST THE COUNSELOR, WHOEVER HE IS.
Jesus said to them, "Have you never read in the scriptures: 'The very stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner; this was the Lord's doing, and it is marvelous in our eyes? Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it. And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces; but when it falls on any one, it will crush him."
Jesus may be referring to the Jews or chosen people above but what he says may apply equally to the many who call themselves Christians.
JUST AS THE KINGDOM OF GOD WILL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THE CHOSEN ONES AND GIVEN TO A NATION THAT PRODUCES THE FRUITS OF IT, IT CAN AND WILL BE TAKEN AWAY FROM CHRISTIANS AND GIVEN TO A NATION THAT PRODUCES THE FRUITS OF IT.
IT IS FOOLHARDY AND FALSE LOGIC (THAT ENDS IN MAD LOGIC) TO SUGGEST I AM INDULGING IN SELF GLORIFICATION.
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS SAID WHOEVER SPOKE AGAINST THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN?
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS SAID THE COUNSELOR IS THE HOLY SPIRIT.
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT JESUS DESCRIBED IN SOME DETAIL WHAT THE COUNSELOR WILL SAY?
IS IT TRUE OR NOT THAT THOSE WHO WILL READ THE NEW TESTAMENT SERIOUSLY WILL BE CHRISTIANS AND THEREFORE THE MESSAGE IS INTENDED FOR CHRISTIANS?
It did not matter in the past if people did not understand what Jesus was trying to say but when the counselor comes then he will become the target for speaking against and Jesus’ warning becomes relevant.
Convincing The World Of Sin, Righteousness & Judgment:
JESUS SAID THE COUNSELOR WILL SPEAK AND HE WILL CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
ONLY WHEN WHAT THE COUNSELOR SAYS IS ENTIRELY A MATTER FOR DISCERNMENT OR SEEING OR PROVIDING KNOWLEDGE THAT THEY PREVIOUSLY DID NOT HAVE RATHER THAN A MATTER FOR FAITH OR BELIEF OR TRUST CAN WHAT THE COUNSELOR SAY CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
SIN CAN ONLY BE CONDUCT IN SPEECH AND BODY THAT HARMS OTHERS, RIGTHEOUSNESS CAN ONLY BE CONDUCT THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS AND JUDGMENT CAN ONLY BE PUNISHMENT OR SUFFERING THAT THE SINNER WILL EXPERIENCE WHILST HE IS SININING, IN LATER LIFE AND THEREAFTER.
THEREFORE IN ORDER TO CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT, THE COUNSELOR MUST DEMONSTRATE TO THE WORLD HOW THEIR CONDUCT HARMS OTHERS OR IS BLAMEWORTHY (SIN), HOW THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF CONDUCTING ONESELF THAT DOES NOT HARM OTHERS AND HOW THEIR SINFUL CONDUCT WILL LEAD TO CERTAIN SEVERE SUFFERING.
IF IT IS TRUE AS I SAY THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITH THEIR EQUIVALENTS IN THEIR MOTIONS IN EVERY BEING ON EARTH AND HOW THESE UNFALINGLY INDUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS (SIN), HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPEAK WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT DOES NOT INDUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN SELF AND OTHERS (RIGHTEOUSNESS), HOW THEIR MINDS ARE BEING CONSTANTLY CONDITIONED TO CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGES THAT WILL LEAD TO FINAL UNCONTROLLABLE MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (JUDGMENT).
IF NO MAN IN THE PAST OR TODAY HAS EVER SAID THIS, YOU ARE A BRAVE MAN TO SCOFF AT ME BECAUSE IF I AM CORRECT, THERE WILL BE ACCOUNTABILITY.
IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE THAT WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO SAY THIS AND IF I HAVE SAID THIS AND THERE IS NOTHING ELSE ABOUT SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT THEN I WILL HAVE RENDERED THE COUNSELOR OBSOLETE OR PROVEN JESUS WRONG IN SAYING THE COUNSELOR WILL CONVINCE THE WORLD OF SIN, RIGTHEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT.
Deluded Or Blind:
If there is constant stretching of syllables, constant changes in speed and loudness in the speech of all people and animals, including yourself and you cannot see it is so, you are seriously blind or undiscerning because they are not harmless but the inalienable roots to stress, restlessness and distraction that they and you must suffer from and persecute all who come into contact with them. If you think you can be seriously blind and go to heaven, can escape eternal punishment, you may be a great fool.
If you believe you can and do speak without stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness and I can demonstrate that you speak with constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness then you are deluded or have wrong view that the Buddha said has two destinations: hell or the animal womb.