Substance & Style Agreements

Substance & Style Agreements:
Agreement and disagreement are only useful if they are based on substance not style.
If you agree (or disagree) to do something for me eg buy my car or clean my house then it is meaningful and useful based on substance.
People get a cheap (emotional) thrill when others say they agree with them when it is all for show. What is the use of agreeing or disagreeing with what I say? Only those who are uncertain of themselves or insecure get emotional comfort that never lasts but it is only an emotional ‘feel good’ for a moment when someone pets them on the back by agreeing with them.
Therefore if you believe your agreement or disagreement with what I say is meaningful you may be deluded and heading for future mad logic and mad perception because it is mere evanescent flattery. What is important is that you see the truth in what I say that smiling is neither good for you nor your recipients and then work to put a stop to that urge to smile.
It serves no purpose to tell me you disagree with what I say except for the emotional purpose of delivering a censure or manipulate me with your opinions that will redound on you as karma. If you disagree with me the right thing to do is terminate the contrived friendship because there can be no true meeting of minds and hearts between those who harbor disagreement.
Because I am not emotional, it does not thrill me if you say you agree wholeheartedly with everything I say (and more!!!) and I am not downcast or hurt if you say the opposite (because I am not beholden to you or anyone).
WHENEVER THERE IS NOTHING TO BE GAINED IN AGREEING AND DISAGREEING IN AN ISSUE FOR SEEING OR DOING, THEN EXPRESSIONS OF AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT ARE MEANINGLESS, ACHIEVE NOTHING EXCEPT AS INSTRUMENT FOR EMOTIONAL BONDING WITH THE PERSON OR METING OUT EMOTIONAL PUNISHMENT.
AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT IS ONLY MEANINGFUL & USEFUL ON A MATTER THAT YOU CAN UNDERTAKE OR PUT INTO ACTION LIKE AGREEING OR NOT AGREEING TO LEND ME YOUR CAR, AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT IS MEANINGLESS, SERVES NO PURPOSE EXCEPT AS AN INDIRECT VEHICLE OR EXCUSE FOR PATTING SOMEONE ON THE BACK OR SLAPPING HIS FACE IF IT IS ON SOMETHING YOU CANNOT OR DO NOT INTEND TO CARRY OUT ANYTHING AS A RESULT OF YOUR AGREEMENT OR DISAGREEMENT. IF YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE ON SOMETHING THAT HAS NO PURPOSE OR MEANING EXCEPT EMOTIONAL REWARD & PUNISHMENT, YOU ARE HEADED FOR MADNESS BECAUSE YOU HAVE MAD LOGIC AND PERCEPTION.
BEFORE YOU HASTEN TO AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH WHAT I SAY, MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTAND OR CAN SEE WHAT I SAID, HAVE GIVEN A TRY WHAT I HAVE SAID OTHERWISE YOU ARE HEADING FOR JUDGMENT.
EITHER YOU SEE OR DO NOT SEE WHAT I SAY, YOU PUT TO PRACTICE OR NOT PUT TO PRACTICE WHAT I SAY AND THEREFORE YOU ARE FOOLISH AND COURTING FUTURE MADNESS TO SAY YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH WHAT I SAY.
What is the use of agreeing or disagreeing with what I say that there are constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness in your speech and that they are the only sources of stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset you?
Can you as a result of your agreement or disagreement with me see that there are constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness in your speech that I can demonstrate to you unequivocally?
Can you as a result of agreeing or disagreeing with me put them to a stop for comparative purposes? If it is beyond your power to stop yourself stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, you have never experienced the incomparable difference entailed, what is the use of agreeing or disagreeing with me except that they are hollow praise or unrighteous disparagement?
AGREEING OR DISAGREEING WITH WHAT I SAY IS STYLE OR FOR SHOW AGREEMENT AND YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY INCRIMINATING YOURSELF AS AN ACTOR WHO CHERISHES STYLE IF YOU BELIEVE YOUR DISAGREEMENT WITH WHAT I SAY IS MEANINGFUL WHEN IT SERVES NO PURPOSE EXCEPT TO DELIVER A SLAP ON MY FACE THAT YOU WANT ME TO BELIEVE IS GOOD FOR ME AND MY FAULT.
THE FRUIT OF STYLE AGREEMENT IS EMOTIONAL RAPPORT OR REINFORCEMENT OF MUTUALLY HELD DELUSIONS, THE FRUIT OF STYLE DISAGREEMENT IS PUTTING OTHERS DOWN (DISPARAGEMENT) OR PUNISHING THEM BY WITHOLDING APPROVAL THAT MAKES YOU FEEL POWERFUL.
AGREEING TO BUY MY CAR OR TO DO SOMETHING FOR ME IS SUBSTANCE OR MEANINGFUL AGREEMENT. THE FRUIT OF SUBSTANCE AGREEMENT IS SOMETHING GETS DONE OR ACHIEVED.
WHETHER YOU ARE AWARE OR NOT OF THE MOTIVATIONS BEHIND YOUR EXPRESSIONS OF AGREEMENT AND DISAGREEMENT, IF IT IS AIMED AT SUBJUGATING OTHERS, KEEPING OTHERS IN EMOTIONAL ORBIT AROUND YOU, YOU HAVE GRAVE DEBT NOT MERIT. IF APART FROM EMOTIONAL GRATIFICATIONS THERE IS NO USEFUL PURPOSE SERVED IN YOUR AGREEING AND DISAGREEING THEN IF YOU BELIEVE IT IS MEANINGFUL, YOU ARE DELUDED AND HEADING FOR THE DESTINATION OF DELUSION.
Three Mandatory Suffering In Liking:
Whoever you are, whatever you may like, you must experience suffering that originates from three sources:
The process of liking: Because liking is always not just a forceful process (lust and greed are actually forms of liking) but people who like always exert force on their minds that accelerates in speed and strength towards the object of their liking be it tasty food, pretty girl or nice music, they must experience a hangover in stress, restlessness and distraction after the initial euphoria or rush of blood fades.
The object of liking: Because all targets of liking in this world are never wholesome or harmless but always have harmful content, they must induce stress or harm in the person who likes them.
All objects for liking are like alcohol. No matter how you like your alcohol, it always harms your liver and decimates your brain cells apart from other side effects like inebriation that exposes the person to dangers that people choose to ignore until it is too late.
Anyone who likes is like the man who foolishly embraces a porcupine must experience pain that is entirely due to the porcupine, has nothing to do with his embracing, even so anyone who likes must suffer due to the nature of all objects that can be liked.
Because all the music in the world contain constant stretching of notes, changes in speed and loudness that induces stress, restlessness and distraction in anyone who listens, whosoever likes music as rendered in this world is like the man who embraces a porcupine, he will be hurt.
Because all the pretty girls in the world adopt postures, move and speak with constant stretching of postures (twisted seductive stances), movements and syllables, constant changes in speed and strength of force in their movements and speech, whoever likes any pretty girl is a masochist liking something that will induce stress, restlessness and distraction.
No matter how much you like your food, your body must engage in a chemical battle to digest it, the food contain chemicals that are harmful to your body either directly or indirectly, acutely or chronically (eg leading to diabetes, dental decay or heart disease) and therefore whoever likes his food likes something that is harmful and will cause harm either acutely as indigestion or disease later.
In truth liking is totally unnecessary, it is sufficient you note that something visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory or gustatory is pleasant, very pleasant, unpleasant or very unpleasant. Nowhere in this process is it stipulated that you must forcefully like or dislike it.
The prognosis of liking: There is another source of suffering in the fool who likes and dislikes. Because liking is forceful, has strength and ease or arousal that can be developed, after a lifetime of liking, the fool become seized to increasingly like and dislike everything that comes to his attention, his liking and disliking becomes very intense & hard to shrug off and he is headed for the torment of maddening uncontrollable intense liking and disliking, not bliss.
WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, THE PROCESS OF LIKING IS SUFFERING THAT YOU CHOOSE TO OVERRIDE IN FAVOR OF EMOTIONAL GRATIFICATION, WHATEVER THE TARGETS OF LIKING AVAILABLE ON EARTH ARE UNWORTHY OF LIKING BECAUSE THEY CREATE SUFFERING FOR THE PERSON WHO LIKES AND LIKING IS AN ADDICTION LIKE ALCOHOL ADDICTION THAT WILL LEAD TO LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD LIKING.
YOU MAY BE SMUG IN TICKING ME OFF BY SAYING YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE BUT IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT, YOU ARE DOOMED TO SUFFER STRESS FROM YOUR LIKING AND YOUR SMILING.
NOWADAYS BECAUSE I AM UNEMOTIONAL, I DO NOT LIKE OR DISLIKE, WHEN SOMETHING IMPINGES MY CONSCIOUSNESS I MERELY NOTE PLEASANT OR UNPLEASANT AND DO NOT PURSUE THEM.
People talk as if they are masters of their liking thus, “I like this, I like that” but they have no choice, cannot stop themselves liking if they want (they can suppress expressing their liking on occasion but not stop their liking) and are slaves of their liking and they should therefore rightfully speaking they should always say, “I cannot help liking this and that”.
People speak facetiously of liking in order to be charming thus: “I would like to think it is possible” when they mean “I think it may be possible”. Whether liking is experienced or not when you say so, by speaking thus they are conditioning themselves to like that is never unadulterated pleasure but heading for torment. Again people fake liking as TV personalities do in order to falsely impress you how wonderful the product they want to recommend to you is. Even if it is faked, because the liking is fabricated with intense mental force and expressive drama they are violently conditioning themselves to faked liking that will end in agony.
People are encouraged by society and friends to like, they facetiously speak of liking all the time, they fake liking with great realism all the time, is it any surprise that they should already become seized, addicts of liking and thus seized, not masters of their liking, is it any surprise they defiantly uphold their liking and smiling to say in delusion that “I smile because I like someone”?
IT IS ACTUALLY HARD TO DISTINGUISH LIKE FROM GREED OR LUST THAT ARE CENSURED BY RELIGIONS THAT ARE WORTH THEIR SALTS AND THEREFORE THE PERSON WHO CELEBRATES HIS LIKING IS SOMNOLENTLY CELEBRATING HIS GREED AND LUST AND IF THE PERSON WHO LIKES TO LIKE THINKS HE IS HEADED FOR HEAVEN RATHER THAN ETERNAL PUNISHMENT, HE MAY BE MAKING A GRAVE ERROR.
You enjoy things better by not liking:
It is because people have never experienced the passive state of neither liking nor disliking that they think it is a form of painful self-deprivation.
You actually always appreciate and therefore enjoy things more if you do not like or dislike something because your mind is then passive (without any force), open and more receptive of the sensory experience as compared when you are seized by attractive force that will color or detract or prejudice your experience apart from applying force on your mind that will lead to stress, restlessness and distraction.
Effort must be made, energy consumed and stress generated to like. No effort is necessary, no energy wasted and stress generated to not like nor dislike. This is a world where everyone including those who call themselves good want to encourage you to like and suffer like them.
Speaking as a person who has experienced liking in the past (albeit never as passionate as others) and now having experienced the ability to experience things without liking and disliking, I can say that not to like and dislike is an incomparably saner and enjoyable way to exist.
If people observe themselves carefully, unless they are tired, depressed or distracted, when confronted by an object of their desire (eg a ‘gorgeous’ gold watch) they are instantly seized by liking that may make their eyes glower. They may suppress their liking from view but they actually cannot help liking. Not to like when confronted with a desirable object is the thing they cannot do and they are kidding themselves to think they are masters of their liking.
Just as according to the Buddha, kingship over men is meager compared with heavenly pleasure, not to like is incomparable happiness compared with liking and it cannot to be obtained by mere wishing. You access not liking by paying attention to not stretch syllables, not change speed and loudness when speaking.
Why “I smile because I like somebody” Is Always False:
You can examine whatever is said to you in different ways, view it from different perspectives and whatever way you choose to view the statement, “I smile because I like someone” it is false and advocating harm or evil not benefit.
You actually enjoy all things (not some things) better if you (passively) neither like nor dislike it but ordinary people have never experienced this nor are capable of doing so because they always react emotionally or actively to like/dislike or fake like when they disliked, fake dislike when they liked to anything that occurs to them. Therefore your smiling that is based on your liking to something is based on a perversion of enjoyment and therefore false, misleads others, influences others to do something false and stressful namely smile in response to another thing false and stressful called liking.
People have this abiding delusion that liking is an option that is superior to enjoy things that they are masters who choose to exercise when they are trapped helpless slaves to liking that they have been initially forced by others and learnt to force themselves to like whenever they experienced sensory phenomena that were pleasant, they have in addition repeatedly faked forceful liking for phenomena that were unpleasant or neither pleasant nor unpleasant, they have faked forceful disliking or indifference to phenomena that were pleasant so that they are now very mixed up or disturbed people who are always forced to react with stressful liking, disliking or faked indifference to anything that happens to them.
If I were to ask people to give me a smile, they would be able to oblige and render at least a sheepish smile and those who are tougher goats may even produce a gorgeous grin. Don’t tell me you smiled for me because you suddenly liked me? Therefore smiles can be produced on demand without liking and it is false to say I smile because I like.
The fact that ordinary people who hear such statements see no wrong and agree however reluctantly to its message, the person who utters such statement obviously does not believe he is guilty of falsity, unrighteousness reflects that both speaker and listeners are deluded, have false logic to believe what is false is true. The final destination for false logic is mad logic unless death or suicide supervenes and if ordinary people and the person who spoke thus examine their daily lives, they will surely find episodic madness in that they lapse into dazes, say and do meaningless things that they seem unable to stop, they suddenly become seriously stressed and restless.
Firstly, if you are going to tell me unsolicited (I never asked him why he smiles) why you smile, you must attempt to elaborate all the possible motivations behind your smiles otherwise you are guilty of trying to paint too wholesome a picture of yourself.
People smile for many reasons and liking for someone is just one reason. They also smile to deceive others eg they don’t like or are indifferent but because you are a customer he wants to sell to, they smile falsely to convey they like you when they like your money. People also smile because they are embarrassed as when they smile at another person after they have just farted or discovered their undone trouser zipper. This is actually smiling out of deception, to convey that it is funny to fart or expose oneself. People also smile to hide their hurt as when someone says something sarcastic and they smile to falsely say that far from hurt, they are happy. People smile to advertise falsely their happiness or social confidence when they feel nervous and that is falsely misleading others.
People smile at the misfortune of others as when they smile at jokes that poke fun at others and smile when someone slips and falls on a peel. Apart from smiling at the misfortune of others, another reason people smile at a joke is to appreciate absurdity or falsity of the situation. For instance a person may break out in a smile when he realizes the person is describing his fall flat on his face when he said the floor came up to meet his face. Absurdity is falsity and therefore smiling at jokes is always either cruelly smiling at someone’s misfortune or smiling at the falsity of a situation or appreciating falsity that is always sinful.
People smile to intimidate others to agree with them. By proposing something with a smile, you are falsely saying you’re a friendly and therefore the recipient should accede. People also smile for no reason, out of temporary insanity they conveniently label as wholesome ‘silliness’ because smiling is essentially forced, false and conditioning, after innumerable smiles they already have a mad urge that they can now still suppress to smile madly out of context or for no reason.
Therefore if you are going to tell me (unsolicited) the reasons why you smile you should either say, “Amongst the many different reasons why I smile, I smile because I like someone” or you must list all the various reasons and truthfully say, I smile because I like somebody, to hide my dislike, embarrassment, to deceive others, to laugh at the misfortune of others, to exert pressure on others and for no reason at all out of silliness.
Even if your smiles are always as pure and white as lilies, can you stand surety that others do not smile to deceive, please, impress, intimidate and dominate others? If you cannot endorse other people’s smiles you are foolish not to specify that “You may criticize other people’s smiling but you cannot criticize mine because I smile purely because I like somebody”.
Maybe you do not do this but if you watch people they tend to prolong their smile or smile throughout their speech. Don’t tell me they keep smiling because they keep on trying to tell me they like me, they cannot tell me enough that they like me? Surely it is insane, a gross waste of energy creating stress, restlessness and distraction to keep smiling during a conversation to keep telling me you like me? Or is it because they keep smiling to falsely impress their friendliness, they want something from me or they cannot help it?
JUST BECAUSE YOUR SMILES ARE PURE AS LILY DOES NOT MEAN THE SMILES OF OTHERS MUST ALSO BE PURE AS LILY.
JUST BECAUSE I AM WRONG TO CRITICIZE YOUR SMILES DOES NOT MEAN I MUST BE SIMILARLY WRONG IN CRITICIZING OTHER PEOPLE’S SMILES THAT IS IMPLIED BY YOUR STATEMENT THAT DOES SPECIFY THAT I MAY CRITICIZE OTHERS’ SMILES BUT I AM WRONG TO CRITICIZE YOUR SMILES.
IF I HAD DOUBTS ABOUT MY CRITICISM OF SMILING I WOULD NOT HAVE SAID IT AND BY TELLING ME I AM WRONG, YOU WANT ME TO DOUBT MYSELF. IF YOU HAVE NO DOUBT IN YOUR BELIEF AND IT IS INCOMPATIBLE TO MINE THEN THE RIGHT THING IS TO PART WAYS.
It is a reflection of the person’s delusion and perversion that he cannot see as it is that both the smile and the liking that he proffers as the genuine and beneficial basis for his smile are false and harmful to self and others.
A major reason why people are deluded that their smiling and liking are genuine and wholesome is because they have practiced both for so long so often even up to intense levels such that their minds are strongly conditioned to like and smile on cue that is largely if not totally beyond their control and because they cannot give up their will to manipulate others, cannot work persistently to scrub off their urge to like and smile and reinforced by everyone everywhere, they therefore will themselves so well to see that their liking and smiling are good for themselves and others, refuse to see the connection between smiling and liking to stress such that now they forcefully believe that their smiling and liking are good for themselves and others, have nothing to do with the stress they experience in their daily lives, not realizing they have one foot over the edge of future insanity.
Just because you find someone or something (eg jam) very pleasant to sight or taste does not mean you must like him or the jam but because liking is an attractive mental force with strength and speed, the stronger and more greedy your liking, the more violent force you apply on your mind to stress, distract and make it restless. This liking can be appreciated by the recipient to similarly stir stress, restlessness and distraction in him. Similarly the constant stretching, changes in force and speed that is present in ordinary people’s smiling stresses, make restless and distracts both the person who smiles and the recipient of his largesse who might feel oblige to smile to appear grateful against his wishes.
Liking is totally unnecessary in any situation, is always sinful not good and if you do not think it is sinful, liking always imparts stress, restlessness and distraction in the person and others.
A smile can be described as laughing without sound and laughing can be defined as a smile accompanied by sound. Jesus said woe to you who laughs for you shall weep. Therefore those who smile and encourage others to do so may be walking on thin ice that may give way in the future if you keep walking on it.
Because ordinary people’s smiles always is a combo of substance (the smile) and style (stretching, changes in speed and strength of force), they are always rendered mindlessly by rote from memory that is often not even partially consciousness but totally unconscious. If you are just an overrated disc jockey who always presses the smile button when the occasion to smile arises, you may think your smile is genuine but you may be no more than a mindless regurgitating smiling robot.
On every occasion that you are not conscious you are smiling or liking someone during the process of smiling, you have rendered false what you said that you (only) smile because you liked someone because that smile is mindless.
Do you also stretch your smile, change speed and strength of force (as there is in the smiles of all ordinary people) because you like the person or are these intended to make your smile more falsely charming to impress?
People often force themselves against their will (thereby stressing themselves) to return a smile because someone smiled at them. Can you be sure your smile motivated out of liking will not similarly force others to stressfully return your smile? If you say your genuine smile does not do that or it is none of your business if they feel obliged to stressfully return your smile, you may be treading on thin ice that will collapse and drown you.
A person of truth always means only what he says and says what he means. If your intention to say “I smile because I like someone” has hidden meaning more that to let me know that but it is a convenient vehicle to tell off, tick me off then you are guilty of stabbing me in the back. If you disagree with me, you think what I say is rubbish, you should tell me plainly so not tell me the reason why you smile that proves to be untenable.
A goat in sheepskin may be punished more than a goat who does not pretend to be a sheep. If you want to slap me and make me feel grateful for being slapped by you, you are guilty of a greater crime than one who slaps another.
If someone proffers you shit and make no pretense it is shit he is less a sinner than someone who proffers you shit and want you to accept it as food because not only does he want you to suffer by eating shit, he wants to generate conflict in you that leads even to insanity.
IF THE SMILING YOU TELL ME IS SO GENUINE AND GOOD FOR YOURSELF THAT YOU WANT TO RECOMMEND IT TO ME, IT SHOULD BE GOOD BY ITSELF WITHOUT NEED FOR LIKING AND YOU SHOULD THEREFORE BE SMILING ALL THE TIME OR AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO IN ORDER TO PERMANENTLY ESCAPE SADNESS. SO WHY AREN’T YOU DOING SO?
Unwitting self-incrimination:
When I say that I have yet to come across a person or creature that can vocalize without stretching syllables/notes, changing speed and loudness, you can go to the ends of this world and never find a person like me (who can speak without stretching syllables, change speed and loudness and therefore truly does not persecute others) and that even those who think they are good and smart are not as good and smart as they think they are, those who are emotional are likely to instantly experience indignation and dismiss me as arrogant or out of my mind, not realizing that they are incriminating themselves and validating what I say.
How do you know what I say is not true, is not backed by objective evidence?
Indignation and derision are emotions that harm the mind of that person apart from conditioning it progressively to be indignant and derisive that will end in insanity.
Thus by being indignant and derisive you are demonstrating you are a fool (hurting yourself by creating stress, restlessness and distraction that conditions your mind) and not as good as you think you are (you are presumptuously dismissing what I say).
The right thing to do if you think I accuse people wrongly is to confront me and I will show you objectively how different your speech and the speech of anyone you care to champion sounds distinctively different if there are not stretching, changes in speed and loudness.
If you and everyone are as smart and good as you think, how come you cannot stop stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness that creates stress, restlessness and distraction in yourself and others?
THEREFORE MY STATEMENTS ARE NOT BASELESS OR DERIVED FROM CONCEIT BUT OBJECTIVE. PEOPLE ARE NOT AS GOOD AND SMART AS THEY LIKE TO THINK AND THAT IS THE REASON WHY THEY ARE HERE SUFFERING AND HEADED EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY OF SUFFERING.
How To Be To Your Advantage:
Jesus said it is to your advantage that I should go because if he did not go, the counselor will not come.
Only if what the counselor will speak or do is something you will not have known and done by yourself and it is irrefutably beneficial, leads to a reduction and even total cessation of suffering depending on the ability of the listener to understand and carry out and leads even to heaven will the counselor be to your advantage to come.
Many even those who call themselves smart and good cannot stop themselves stretching their syllables, changing speed and loudness even after I have personally demonstrated to them how they do so, let alone they will by themselves discover and put them to a stop and experience a release from stress, restlessness and distraction that was previously unimaginable.
If this not stretching syllables, not forcefully changing speed and loudness is the only way not to harm oneself and others and therefore goodwill that leads even to heaven, isn’t what I say to your advantage?
Seeing how recalcitrant those who call themselves good and smart are to refuse to work to stop stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness even when it is liberation from stress, restlessness and distraction it is highly unlikely if not impossible that anyone amongst them would have caused the consciousness state of the world to change twice both after 1977 and in recent years because those changes require persistent unflinching application of determination not to succumb to social intimidation and norms before they can come to fruition.
IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER THE COUNSELOR JESUS MENTIONED IS AN ENTITY OF THE MIND OR A PHYSICAL BEING, IF THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT I TRIGGERED AFTER 1977 AND IN RECENT YEARS AND WHAT I HAVE SAID ARE CRUCIALLY BENEFICIAL TO EVERYONE, THEN I HAVE ALREADY ACCOMPLISHED THEM AND RENDERED THE COUNSELOR REDUNDANT OR RENDERED WHAT JESUS SAID AS FALSE THAT ONLY THE COUNSELOR HE SPOKE OF CAN DO SO.
IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE THAT THERE ARE CONSTANT FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN THE SPEECH OF ALL BEINGS (INCLUDING ANIMALS) AND I CAN DEMONSTRATE HOW DISTINCTIVELY DIFFERENT THEY WILL SOUND IF THERE ARE NO STRETCHING AND CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THEY ARE THE ONLY INALIENABLE ROOTS TO THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT REGULARLY TORMENT THEM, THAT CONDITIONS AND DEGRADES THEIR MIND SO THAT IF THEY DID NOT DESIST IF THEY ARE ABLE, THEY ARE HEADED FOR CERTAIN MAD (RAPIDLY AROUSED INTENSE HARD TO SHAKE OFF) STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND THEREAFTER THEY ARE HEADED EVEN FOR EVERLASTING PERDITION FOR THUS PERSECUTING ALL WHO HAVE CONTACT WITH THEM, THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR WHETHER HE IS IN THE MIND OR PHYSICAL, UNLESS HE HAS ALREADY SAID THEM AND CHANGED THE WORLD’S CONSCIOUSNESS AS I HAVE DONE TWICE, MUST ALSO SAY THEM AND IF I HAVE SAID SO BEFOREHAND I WOULD HAVE RENDERED HIM REDUNDANT.
The person who likes is not letting his yes be yes only:
Jesus said let your yes be yes only; anything more comes from evil. He said you should deny yourself, carry your cross of persecution and go with him.
The person who likes is the person who does not let his yes be yes only and does not deny himself.
The reason is because liking is totally unnecessary, is not beneficial but creates stress, restlessness and distraction and is enforced by everyone in this world.
Liking is an option not a necessity and it is because people will not deny themselves as Jesus exhorts them, they are perverts to think that liking is wholesome when it is stressful and lead to insanity and its opposite not to like but merely to note passively that something is pleasant is incomparably superior, they have practiced liking for so long so well that it is largely involuntary and they cannot help it that they believe liking is intrinsic and good.
Whatever that is visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory and gustatory that impinges on a person can only pleasant or very pleasant that the person who lets his yes be yes only and nothing else merely take note, he does not apply force to like. It is incomparably saner not to like and dislike and it is a perversion and masochistic to like.
Anyone who likes must harbor dislike for that very same object and himself because no matter how he cannot see his liking is inimical to himself, he must experience the stress, restlessness and distraction that are the hangover and he therefore must be sick of himself and the object he likes for giving him a hangover that takes time to shed.
Further, not only is forceful liking harmful but many if not all the objects or persons he likes are in truth not likeable because they are harmful. The music that they like contain constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness that must make him stressed, restless and distracted afterwards and anyone who likes things that induces stress, restlessness and distraction must suffer from the stress, restlessness and distraction thus induced.
Why It Is Difficult If Not Impossible For People To Change:
Why is that people to a man, even those who are supposed to be intelligent & good seem impervious to change even when to change by stopping acting or constantly putting on a show will be irrefutably to their advantage in permanent liberation from stress, restlessness and distraction (something inconceivable in the past) and not to change will end in the agony of mad stress, restlessness and distraction?
The reasons are a combination of poor discernment they cannot see things clearly as they are, even when it is pointed out clearly many times to them eg they cannot see constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness in their speech that are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset them), delusion (not only do they see no wrong, they believe their behavior is meritorious), their minds may already be permanently warped by past acting abuses, they are largely if not entirely mechanical, mindless inflexible emotional robots, slaves to many bad habits in behavior, thought and perception, lumbering freight trains than masters of themselves who can objectively process new information and turn on a dime and these, coupled with an external society that includes the existing religious orthodoxy that feeds and maintains them on a complete diet of falsity they insist you accept as truth whilst incessantly bombarding each other with behavior in speech, music, sights and motions that induces stress, restlessness and distraction so dims their ability to see things clearly so that they all become compliant zombies who uphold the status quo. Further, if their true natures be known, they are beings who are quite indifferent to truth, have urges to manipulate and make others suffer (in other words they are far less savory or blameless than they like to believe and want others to believe), although they may be very intelligent that is merely superior memorizing and recall and they are quite undiscerning beings.
All ordinary people are constantly never intermittently emotional people who all have biased emotion rather than passive reason as their receptionist so that anything said to them or that they read can fall on deaf ears if it is not what they want to hear or they will be seriously misapprehended or twist it to suit their world views.
Even if what is said to them successfully negotiates their emotional receptionist, they understand what you are trying to convey to them, they may not change because the way they perceive, think, speak and behave is largely beyond their control because they are merely disc jockeys or voyeurs operating autonomous mental jukeboxes who are the true sources of their behavior in perception, thought, speech and motion. These behavior originating automatically from their jukeboxes are driven by much force that may have already warped their minds and in order for them to change, they must be dedicated enough to persistently pay attention to their offending conduct eg pay attention to their speech for stretching, changes in speed and loudness and work without flagging to correct themselves that initially will have scant rewards but if they persisted, the permanent release from stress, restlessness and distraction will enable them to see more clearly stretching, changes in speed and loudness that they previously could not see so that they can be eliminated to further reduce their suffering.
THE REASONS WHY PEOPLE ARE VERY RESISTANT TO CHANGE ARE BECAUSE:
THEY ARE DETAINED BY SIGNIFICANT CONSTANT STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN NOW RISE RAPIDLY TO SEVERE LEVELS THAT BLUR THEIR VISION, PREVENTS THEM FROM SEEING CLEARLY HOW FOR EXAMPLE THE WAYS THEY SPEAK HAVE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY ADDITIONAL FORCE, STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT GENERATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
THEY ARE OWNERS OF SIGNIFICANTLY FAULTY WORLD AND SELF IDENTITY VIEWS THAT MAINTAIN THEM IN DELUSION THAT ALL IS WELL AND THEY ARE EVEN HEADED FOR HEAVEN WHEN THEY ARE ON THE SIDE OF MEN.
SOCIETY AND PEOPLE EVERYWHERE INDOCTRINATE AND MAINTAIN THEM IN THEIR DELUSIONS THAT ALL IS WELL, SOCIETY AND PEOPLE EVERYWHERE BOMBARD THEM WITH SIGHTS AND SOUNDS THAT INDUCE UNRELENTING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT RENDER THEM UNDISCERNING AND POWERLESS TO CHANGE.
IF THEIR TRUE INNER NATURES BE KNOWN, THEY ARE FAR LESS SAVOURY OR DISCERNING THAN THEY LIKE TO BELIEVE THEY ARE. THEY STILL HARBOR URGES TO MANIPULATE AND HURT OTHERS. THEY HAVE MISTAKEN THEIR CAREFULLY CAMOUFLAGED ILL WILL AS THEIR GOODWILL. THOUGH THEY MAY BE VERY INTELLIGENT, THIS IS MERELY SUPERIOR MECHANICAL MEMORIZING AND RETRIEVAL OF THEIR MEMORIES AND THEY ARE POORLY DISCERNING PEOPLE.
THEY ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WAYS THEY PERCEIVE, THINK, SPEAK AND MOVE BUT THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES DRIVEN BY CONSIDERABLE RESERVE FORCE AND AUTOMATISM THAT MAY ALREADY HAVE PERMANENTLY WARPED THEIR MINDS ARE RESPONSIBLE AND IN ORDER FOR THEM TO EXIT THEIR AUTOMATED BEHAVIOR, THEY MUST FIRST WAKE UP TO THE FACT THAT THEIR BEHAVIOR IS AUTOMATED, THEY MUST MAKE DEDICATED EFFORT TO TURN OFF THEIR JUKEBOX FUNCTIONING AND REPLACE IT BY LIVE FOR THE MOMENT BEHAVIOR, SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER DONE IN THEIR LIVES.