Real & Apparent Meaning To Life:

Real & Apparent Meaning To Life:
Because LIKE is nothing more than the consciousness experience generated by undulating changes in the speed and strength of mental force and DISLIKE is the consciousness experience generated by accelerating speed and strength changes of the mental force, because no one is a master of his likes and dislikes but he is increasingly their helpless slave, because likes and dislikes are never part time but full time, only their intensities vary depending on the object, if your life revolves around likes and dislikes (as is the case of not just ordinary people but all animals) then you may derive some emotional sustenance or meaning from liking and disliking in your existence here but this meaning or satisfaction is always attended by malaise, doubt, uncertainty, stress, restlessness and distraction and it is ultimately hollow or meaningless and no matter how you may deny it is so, this reality you willfully repress will rear up to haunt you every now and then and you must feel sick of yourself and others for constantly subjecting yourself to likes and dislikes that can reach tormenting levels.
On the other hand, if your life is not predicated on likes and dislikes, you eschew them COMPLETELY by practicing constancy in speed and strength of force in whatever you perceive, think, speak and do, then your life here is not based on the two yoyo consciousness experiences generated by mindless fluctuations of mental force but it is based on true, calm and clearly thinking unwavering reason, based on seeing things clearly as they are not as you like or dislike them to be, based on true passive love and concern for yourself and others and this is a true and everlasting meaning to your life here and thereafter (in heaven) because you cannot hurt yourself or others by neither liking nor disliking (but you ALWAYS hurt yourself and others by liking and disliking that you can only deny and keep denying until it becomes too cancerous to deny).
If you have an eye for truth, animals also like and dislike just as humans do and their lives similarly revolve around little more than like and dislike and if your life in truth revolves around little more than an endless litany of likes and dislikes, you may be destined to join the animals after you depart here, not just for one or two life spans but even for another eternity or Age.
Jesus said ‘Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to eternal life’. Likes and dislikes are the (only) food that sustains people here and it perishes (because they are nothing more than the consciousness experiences due to ephemeral or evanescent changes in one’s mental force) and are ultimately meaningless whilst true unwavering reason, concern and loving kindness for others endures.
(If I am a fake, not the counselor Jesus described, can you or anyone fake like me? Even the Buddha and Jesus did not speak like me, not because I am greater but because as Jesus said, you could not bear them then and it is a reflection that there have been unmistakable previously inconceivable consciousness changes occurring to everyone both after 1977 and in recent years in which I was the unacknowledged trigger that it is possible for me to speak thus whilst even today there is not one other man who will say, “Why is everybody changing in an unprecedented way and why are we constantly stretching our syllables, changing speed and loudness when it is the root to our tormenting stress, restlessness and distraction?” and even when it is demonstrated to them how they do so, they nevertheless continue somnolently either because they cannot see, they are helpless or indifferent, not as good or devoted to truth as they pretend to be.)
Faked & False Logic:
Reasoning is either the process of working out the meaning of what has happened and therefore what appropriate actions are to be taken or it is the rationale behind what you say or do and how you say or do it.
There is true reasoning that must be formulated live specific for that occasion and it can only be based on seeing the event in its entirety clearly as it is, not excerpts as you like or dislike to then identify ALL (not some) of the information therein that may be relevant to form (or not form) a conclusion.
There is false reasoning that is based on seeing a situation selectively as you like or dislike it and then identifying some of the relevant information present (either through hastiness, carelessness or deliberate like or dislike) to come to a conclusion that will be and can be objectively shown to be false. The reasons you do or say something or the style with which you say or do it is false if it is harmful or unnecessary.
There is faked reasoning that is reasoning you did not work out by yourself but you copied into your mental jukebox from others eg under social pressures or you reproduced unreasoning from your mental jukebox to apply to a situation empirically based on past experiences. This faked reasoning is always a false mixture of emotional (eg liking or resenting) meaning and faulty if not false rationale. Ordinary people all have a considerable dictionary of learnt meaning in their mental jukeboxes that they can apply to a situation so everything that occurs to them accords with their world views.
For instance, it is both false and faked logic to say “A saree is anything but a square piece of cloth”
It is false logic because whatever a saree is, it is still a square piece of cloth. There are many things a saree cannot be like it cannot be a cat, food or a house.
It is faked logic is because this is not the first time he said this but he rendered it from his mental jukebox to apply to the situation after having copied it from others; for instance he might have heard someone say before “A Ferrari is anything but a car” and thought it was cute and worth aping without examining the logic behind it.
Quote: Police ruled out the same gang because the modus operandi is different.
Comment: Although criminals usually stick to a certain modus operandi, it can be changed and so it is not logical to say that just because the modus operandi is different the same gang is not involved.
There is actually pervasive faked rote logic in society that people adopt unquestioningly as a result of self and other conditioning. For example some people always smile when others greet them or when they say something without questioning why and ignoring the stress, they have been told to be a winner, it is shameful to be a loser and they therefore conduct themselves accordingly unquestioningly, it has been drummed into them to be assertive or add force in whatever they say or do when there is no reason why it should be so especially when it is stressful. Try telling the person there is no reason to smile when someone greets him or to be forceful in what he says or does and he will think you are odd reflecting that he has accepted his false rote logic that was brainwashed into him without question.
THERE ARE TWO WAYS OF APPROACHING A SITUATION, DO AS YOU ARE TOLD OR THINK LOGICALLY AFTER CONSIDERING ALL RELEVANT FACTORS WHAT IS APPROPRIATE. VERY OFTEN PEOPLE DO OR SAY THINGS BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD SO BY SOCIETY WHICH IS WHY THERE ARE CULTURAL DIFFERENCES.
Ordinary people seldom if ever reason fresh for the occasion, they always search their jukeboxes for a ready emotion cum faulty reason explanation to fit it conveniently after having seen it as they liked or disliked it. They usually sample or take snapshots that may be haphazard of a situation before they search their jukeboxes for explanations that may be applicable rather than reason live from their snapshots.
IF YOU LIKE OR DISLIKE, A BLIND FORCEFUL ATTTRACTIVE OR REPULSIVE REACTION BASED ON PHYSICAL ATTTRIBUTES, YOU HAVE ALREADY PREJUDGED AN EVENT, SO HOW CAN YOU HAVE TRUE LOGIC?
IF YOU ALWAYS LAZILY SEARCH YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX FOR CONVENIENT INSTANT EXPLANATIONS FOR OCCURENCES, HOW CAN YOU HAVE TRUE LOGIC BUT INSTEAD YOU HAVE MINDLESS REHASHED LOGIC THAT IS AT BEST APPROXIMATE THAT CAN NEVER FIT THE SITUATION PERFECTLY?
IN ORDER TO HAVE TRUE REASONING IT MUST BE LIVE FOR THE OCCASION, NOT A REHASH FROM A MENTAL DICTIONARY. YOU MUST SEE THE SITUATION IN ITS ENTIRETY (NOT TAKE SNAPSHOTS) CLEARLY AS IT IS NOT AS YOU LIKED OR DISLIKED IT. YOU MUST THEN IDENTIFY ALL NOT SOME OF THE RELEVANT FACTORS IN THE SITUATION TO FORMULATE YOUR CONCLUSION. IN ADDITION, THE REASON FOR SAYING OR DOING SOMETHING CAN ONLY BE TRUE IF WHAT YOU SAY OR DO DOES NOT HARM YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND IS NECESSARY OR USEFUL. ALL STYLE OR WAY OF DOING OR SAYING IS FALSE, UNNECESSARY, WASTES ENERGY AND STRESSFUL.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO HAVE TRUE REASON EXCEPT IN THE FIGMENT OF THEIR IMAGINATION THEY CAN AND DO.
Why is that so?
First, people never see things in their entirety, but they always take snapshots of a situation, often they only take one snapshot to decide presumptuously what it is all about.
The snapshots they often take are hurried and pretentiously through the corner of their eyes rather than honestly frontally and therefore prone to error.
Secondly they always see things as they like or dislike it which automatically precludes them seeing them clearly as they are.
There is objective incontrovertible proof people cannot see things clearly as it is.
If it is true you can see things clearly as it is then even though you like and cannot give up stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness, you should be able to tell me precisely every occurrence of stretching of your syllables, changing speed and loudness. Because I have yet to come across someone who can pinpoint to me even after I have demonstrated to them how speed and loudness changes sound like (let alone that they should come to a realization themselves), they cannot see (as there is) that there are constant stretching of their syllables, changes of speed and loudness that are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that torment them.
THE TRUTH IS THAT PEOPLE NEVER SEE THINGS AS THEY ARE BUT THEY SEE THINGS AS THEY LIKE OR DISLIKE THEM, THEY NEVER SEE THINGS ENTIRELY BUT THEY ALWAYS SEE THINGS PARTIALLY IN SNAPSHOTS THAT THEY THEN USE AS THE BASIS TO FORM NOT LIVE DECISIONS BUT THEY SEARCH THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES FOR CONVENIENT MEANING TO ASCRIBE TO THE SITUATION.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE A DICTIONARY OF MEANINGS THAT CAN BE ASCRIBED TO WHATEVER HAPPENS TO THEM PRERECORDED IN THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES THAT THEY CAN SEARCH FOR AND APPLY TO MOST IF NOT ALL SITUATIONS AND THESE ROTE MEANINGS ARE BLENDS OF EMOTIONAL MEANING AND FAULTY LOGICAL MEANING THAT THEY OFTEN DID NOT FORMULATE THEMSELVES BUT THEY COPIED WITHOUT REASONING FROM OTHERS (EG THEY ADOPT THE VALUES OF THEIR IDOLS LIKE ELVIS OR PLATO). THEREFORE THEY NEVER TRULY REASON, NEVER LIVE REASON FOR A SITUATION OCCURRING.
The first indispensable step for true reasoning to occur is that you must see things clearly as they are, not as you like or dislike them to be.
For instance if you want to make a reasoned decision whether someone is telling you the truth or not, you must see everything what and how he is telling you clearly. If you already like him maybe because he is handsome or a smooth talker who confesses that he shares many common values with you, you may miss crucial telltale signs that he is lying.
The next crucial step to reasoning as to whether a person is telling you the truth is to identify ALL aspects of the situation (what he says, the way he says it, his bodily and facial expressions) that are relevant for you to decide. Because people take snapshots, they are colored by their liking for the person, they often miss glaring evidence that the person is lying.
YOU WILL BE SURPRISED HOW LITTLE OR NO TRUE LIVE REASONING IS NEEDED IN THE COURSE OF DAILY LIFE, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS DO AS YOU ARE TOLD OR CONSULT YOUR MENTAL DICTIONARY FOR READY MADE MEANING AFTER TAKING SNAPSHOTS OF THE SITUATION.
JUST AS YOU CAN COMPOSE A LIVE LETTER FOR THE OCCASION OR YOU CAN SELECT A FORM LETTER FROM YOUR COMPUTER STORE THAT YOU ONLY FILL IN APPROPRIATE CURRENT DETAILS FOR A SITUATION, YOU CAN ALSO REASON OUT LIVE OR FAKE REASONING FROM YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX.
As they say, rubbish in rubbish out. No matter how good a computer is, if you feed it rubbish data, rubbish results will come out. Therefore seeing the situation clearly, impartially without like or dislike is crucial to perfect reasoning.
Very often people are not even aware their reasoning is faulty or false.
For example when Christians read Jesus saying, “Do not kill or you will be judged” they assume Jesus meant just killing humans when he could have meant all killing including animals. The same venom that you used to smack a mosquito or cockcroach is the same venom you use to stab someone and the wise person will refrain from all killing so that there is no urge to harm anything and this in accord to what the Buddha preached.
Jesus said: Beware of the scribes, who like to go about in long robes and to have salutations (by the people) in the market places.
It is likely that ordinary people who read what Jesus said will conclude falsely that the wearing long robes and being saluted in the market places is censured by Jesus when it is the liking for or the enjoyment of wearing long robes and salutations that is criticized by Jesus because he did not ask you to beware of those who go about in long robes or have salutations in marketplaces.
Quote BBC Headline: Crunch time for Pluto
The headline is clearly false and misleading and the fact that supposedly staid BBC sees nothing wrong reflects its laxity in governing truth that is in keeping with mankind’s attitudes.
An astronomical meeting soon will decide Pluto’s fate as a planet, an event that is unlikely to perturb Pluto or any reasonable minded person.
It is clearly said in jest but mischievous because the mention of crunch time will arouse anxiety in those vulnerable with karma attached. Many see nothing wrong with such headlines; they do not believe that they and those who like to speak in jest are heedless and headed even for eternal punishment.
Many think nothing about but they think it is full of meaning when they utter: Well, huh, uh oh, hmm, jeez, gee whiz when they are meaningless, only to express emotions like disgust or poignancy.
It is illogical or false logic to always speak with stretched syllables, changes in speed and loudness because they are totally unnecessary except for show, they consume prodigious energy cumulatively, create stress, restlessness and distraction that are insoluble and because all ordinary people manifest constant stretching, changes in speed and loudness they must be illogical or falsely logical people not occasionally but mindlessly constantly and this is borne out in practice.
If you listen to someone you are familiar talking, you will realize that what he says and the way he says it is uncannily similar to what he has said in the past and he is therefore little more than a biological tape recording playback machine.
What logic is there in a tape recorder and what difference does it make if the recorder is biological?
Ordinary people who appreciate jokes are essentially appreciating the absurdity of what happened or the misfortune of others. Appreciation of jokes is therefore a form of false logic that what is absurd or is the misfortune of others is funny or enjoyable.
AS I HAVE SAID, FORCE (EMOTION) AND REASON ARE MUTUALLY INCOMPATIBLE AND ORDINARY PEOPLE HAVE THIS DELUSION THAT THEY CAN BE EVEN INTENSELY EMOTIONAL AND STILL BE A PERSON OF REASON, THEY CAN REASON WITH GREAT FORCE OR EMOTION AND IT IS STILL TRUE REASON WHEN IT IS NOT THE REASON THAT IS RELEVANT BUT IT IS THE FORCE THAT IS THE PUPPET MASTER OF FORCEFUL REASONING. FORCE IS A BIG BULLY AND WHENEVER IT IS PRESENT, TRUE REASON IS BANISHED TO THE SIDELINES IF NOT EXTERMINATED. WHATEVER REASONING THERE IS IN FORCEFUL REASONING IS FAULTY AND A DECOY TO JUSTIFY THE FORCE OR EMOTION BEHIND IT.
There is no reason in force except faked reason. There is no force in (true) reason. If there is palpable force in the reasoning, it is an imposter and false.
Animals Also Like & Dislike:
Animals also like and you can demonstrate that by throwing a fist of grain in a chicken yard and see them scamper towards and pecking the grain with gusto that can be concluded from the animated rapid bobbling or undulating speed and strength up and down movements of their heads as they pecked.
Animals also dislike as you can demonstrate to your peril by trying to disturb a tiger by throwing stones or spraying it with water.
So what is so great about your like that you should uphold it?
Just as you are born and will die, animals are also born and die, they have eyes, ears, mouths and organs just like you, there is a possibility that you can be born after you depart as an animal as the Buddha tells you is possible and you can indulge your liking and disliking as animals just as well as you can as humans. And if you think you don’t mind being an animal the Buddha said he can think of nothing more tormenting than hell or the animal womb. The reason may be the compression or serious restrictions of your consciousness that existing as animals entail.
Emotions:
Depending on whether liking or disliking is directed inwards or outwards, depending on the target or situation or specificity in which like or dislike rise, the intensity, sharpness or diffusion of the liking or disliking, different emotions are experienced.
Depression and rage are nothing more than intense sadness and anger. Anger is ill directed outward dislike whilst hate is pointed or directed outward dislike. Lust is like directed at sexual objects, greed is like targeted at money and possessions. Pride and shame are inwardly directed like and dislike.
So what is the big deal about your emotions that you adulate when they are nothing more than like and dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for different occasions?
People Wants Others To Like Them To Bond Them:
Even though they cannot articulate what the nature of liking is, ordinary people know it is an attractive process that becomes helpless and therefore they behave in manners that are seductive to attract the opposite sex so that they become attracted or bonded by attractive force to them that because it is blind or irrational and has strength, bond their targets to them which is what their hearts desire.
For instance a lovesick man may call repeatedly “Maria, Maria, Maria” in a voice with undulating variations in speed and loudness to himself whilst visualizing her with similarly undulating force and speed often in an idealized manner way above her actual physical beauty so that he becomes increasingly bonded to her, becomes even obsessed and jealous of any man who dare express interest in her.
Love Is Blind:
People say love is blind because the love they refer to is sexual like and it is blind because it is nothing more than seeing the person with undulating changes in speed and strength of force. Force and the undulating changes of force in the mind is always blind.
The more intense the force invested in one’s ‘love’, the more violent the changes in speed and strength of force, the blinder and stronger that love or like.
True Love Cannot Turn To Hate:
True love is a passive or forceless concern & loving care for the other person without conditions attached and therefore cannot turn to forceful hate.
Only something that is forceful, liking that has intensity that can become very strong, that is always stressful and tiring to the person and his recipient that if unrequited or spurned can turn to hate.
And therefore if your love or the love you see between others can turn to hate, it is not love but it is liking. The more intense the liking the more intense the hate that is likely to ensue.
Instant Like Or Dislike:
When ordinary people read the headline: Bill Gates To End Daily Role, they instantly helplessly react with ‘like’ like interesting, ‘wow’, good or dislike like ‘this is sad’, ‘good riddance’ or ‘I don’t give a damn’ or ‘big deal’.
If the person read the headline with disdain, he will invariably read the story in a disdainfully manner looking for things to mock ‘ho, ho, ho’ and thus he may think he has read it objectively but he is kidding himself.
In the past I too would react automatically to like or dislike whatever came to my attention, nowadays I just become aware of the headline without any liking or disliking.
People like praise and hate criticism:
Ordinary people like never love praise and they dislike or hate criticism even if it is rational and not abusive.
You can only like or have an attraction for praise, you cannot have loving kindness for praise.
As a result of abusive criticism from others in the past, all ordinary people are very sensitive, they react even violently to all forms of criticism including mine that is not abusive and irrational.
They cannot help reacting with instant strong dislike to hearing or reading what I write that is critical and thus colored, they only take snapshots that they use to justify their rejection of everything I say.
For instance they swiftly pounce on me for saying all ordinary people are robots to say I am arrogant or deluded to think I am special and deprecating others and because they think I am arrogant they think they are just to dismiss everything I say.
The Buddha spoke of ordinary people and noble ones who are exceedingly uncommon in this world. Anyone who scoffs at noble ones is headed for perdition compared to scoffing at ordinary people.
If in truth all ordinary people stretch their syllables, changed speed and loudness and I do not, I am objectively not an ordinary person.
AS A RESULT OF INNUMERABLE ABUSIVE CRITICISM THAT ARE SOMETIMES VALID AND SOMETIMES NOT FROM OTHERS, INCLUDING THEIR ‘LOVED’ ONES, ORDINARY PEOPLE ALREADY POSSESS MAD HATE FOR CRITICISM THAT WELL UP SWIFTLY AND CANNOT BE SUPPRESSED WHEN THEY SENSE CRITICISM EVEN BEFORE THEY COMPLETE HEARING WHAT IS SAID TO THEM.
True Love Cannot Turn To Hate:
You can only truly love someone worthy of love, not someone who is an actor or actress with manipulative behavior. You can only learn to like someone with manipulative behavior because there are physical attributes in the person that attracts you are you wish to be drawn in a possessive relationship of mutual using each other.
True love is passive, without force, is blissful for the giver and receiver, is not possessive (you need force or emotion to be possessive), is aimed at seeing the other person happy or free from suffering that the recipient who is not a goat will receive without reservations.
Liking Can Be Known:
Whether someone likes wearing long robes can be known.
If he looks at himself in the mirror wearing long robes and smiles admiringly, he turns to admire his side and back views, he regularly adjusts his robes so as to present the best appearance he likes wearing long robes, is officious and likes the trappings of his office.
Jesus was born in a manger not the roadside or a palace. He entered Jerusalem on a colt not a donkey or stallion. Essentially it is about quiet dignity without ostentation or deprivation.
***
Because what I speak regarding the cause of suffering and the way out of suffering is unique, nobody in the past or present has ever spoken thus before, what I say applies to all beings (humans and animals) in this world, whoever is the counselor Jesus is referring to must also say so and if I have already done so, I would have superseded him.

What I say is that there are constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in the vocalizations of all humans and animals in this world that have equivalents in their movements, thinking and perceptions that are the only causes of the stress, restlessness and distraction that must beset them and they impart on all who interact with them (sin) and the only way permanently out of stress, restlessness and distraction is the paying attention to identify and then eliminate without remainder all stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness.
In addition I was the person who triggered never before consciousness changes that swept around the world, benefiting everyone, not once but twice first in 1977 and then in recent years. Despite the blatant nature of the changes, mankind has turned a blind eye to them as if nothing has changed.
If Jesus wanted the world to know exactly who the counselor was, he would have pinpointed him and because he did not do so, it is his intention not to identify the counselor irrefutably. If Jesus did not want you to know of the coming of the counselor, he would not have spoken about a counselor and because he gave a description of the counselor, it means that the description is sufficient to identify the counselor in all but name to those who are discerning:

Jesus: "If you love me, you will keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he will give you another Counselor (the counselor will come like Jesus came), to be with you for ever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive (to receive is to welcome and therefore the counselor will not be welcomed), because it neither sees (can recognize who he is) him nor knows him(can work out for themselves or have been told); you know him, for he dwells (if the counselor will be a prominent figure or self identifying, Jesus will not need to inform you that he lives amongst you) with you, and will be in you. "These things I have spoken to you, while I am still with you. But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit (The counselor is the Holy Spirit), whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things (he will cover a broad range of subjects), and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you (if the church has brought you remembrance of what Jesus taught, it would be redundant).But when the Counselor comes (he will not come immediately), whom I shall send to you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness to me; and you also are witnesses, because you have been with me from the beginning. But because I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your hearts. Nevertheless I tell you the truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away, the Counselor will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you. (The counselor must bring you advantage as no man has done)And when he comes, he will convince the world (a voice in the minds of Christians cannot convince the world) concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged. (When the counselor comes, it will be time for mankind to be judged)"I have yet many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now. (Jesus may be alluding to a consciousness change that will make you able to bear and I was the trigger of the change after 1977 and in recent years) When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth; for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak (if the counselor knows everything, he will not need to hear and then speak) and he will declare to you the things that are to come. He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you (if the church and Christians have glorified Jesus, there would be no need for a counselor to do so. If what the counselor speaks is similar to the Church, there would be no need for a counselor to speak). All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.

Jesus: Therefore I tell you, every (not some) sin and blasphemy will (not may) be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against (blasphemes) the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against (blasphemes) the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.