Thursday, November 02, 2006

How Liking Differs From Disliking:

How Liking Differs From Disliking:

Liking can be compared to the situation where a person takes his dog representing his force of going against self for a walk in the park with a leash representing his force of self preservation and though the dog may on occasion tug with great excitement or liking at the leash so that his leash or force of self preservation struggles to hold on, his leash is nevertheless in control or the boss throughout. Disliking may be compared to the situation where the dog sees a cat that incites its aggression or dislike so that it violently breaks loose of the leash or the force of self preservation to run away with unabated speed and strength with the owner or consciousness scampering after it desperately trying to gain purchase of the trailing leash that is the force of self preservation.

THE REASON WHY THERE IS AN UNDULATING RISE AND FALL IN THE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IN LIKING IS BECAUSE THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS HERE BEING REGULATED IN LOCKED STEP BY THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION SHIELDING THE CONSCIOUSNESS FROM THE FULL UNPLEASANT BRUNT OF THE APPLICATION OF FORCE AND THE REASON WHY THERE IS AN ACCELERATING RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IN DISLIKE IS BECAUSE HERE THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION HAS LOST CONTROL OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF, EXPOSING THE CONSCIOUSNESS TO THE FULL UNPLEASANT BRUNT OF THE APPLICATION OF FORCE.

IT IS THE RISE OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION MATCHING THE RISE OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF BLOW FOR BLOW TO SHIELD THE CONSCIOUSNESS FROM THE FULL BRUNT OF THE APPLICATION OF FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS THAT GIVES RISE TO THE EXPERIENCE OF LIKING.

IN CONTRAST, IN DISLIKE THE RISE IN STRENGTH AND SPEED OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF FAR OUTSTRIPS THE RISE OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION AND THE FULL UNPLEASANT IMPACT OF THE NAKED APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS FELT AS DISLIKE.

Apart from not renewing it by repeated self or other provocation to allow mental force that has been stirred to exhaust itself, force can never regulate itself nor can force be regulated directly by reason but mental force can only be regulated either reflexively by another opposite force or by reason (consciousness) instructing another opposite force to counter it.

Once triggered with a certain speed and strength, a force can be repeatedly incited to further increase in speed and strength by continued self or other provocation and it will only come to an end if it has expended itself or it has been brought to a premature end by a rising opposing force on instruction by the person’s reason because the stress is getting intolerable or dangerous.

The essential difference between liking and disliking is that in liking, the force of self preservation is ascendant or always in control over the force of going against self, rising in lock step to neutralize the latter and therefore shielding the consciousness from the full impact of the application of force, the result is experienced by the consciousness as positive or liked whereas in disliking, the force of going against self is ascendant, brushing aside or breaking free of the modulating influence of the force of self preservation to rise unabated in strength and speed that exposes the consciousness to the full brunt of the naked application of harmful unopposed force and is therefore experienced as dislike or alarm.

It is not intrinsic but because the force of going against self is under the constant control of the force of self-preservation in liking that it rises in speed and strength more gently to then fall gently.

It is because the force of self-preservation has lost control of the force of going against self in disliking that it rises unopposed in speed and strength exposing the consciousness to the full impact of naked force.

Once dislike has reached a certain intensity or duration that can be endured that varies considerably between individuals, the pain and agitation may alarm the consciousness so that it desires to stop it and it does so by summoning his force of self preservation to rise to match the force of going against self or he may elect to throw caution to the wind by defiantly keep stoking his dislike (eg by revisiting the thought that provoked his initial dislike or dwelling on newer thoughts that stoke his dislike or he may succumb to continued provocation by others) to maintain and even intensify his dislike disregarding the harm he is doing himself.

On every occasion that you stoke your dislike (eg anger or hate) to a greater strength and acceleration of speed, you have ‘improved’ the intensity and acceleration of your dislike that will make it more difficult to control, easier to arouse and harder to shake off. On every occasion you prolonged the duration of your dislike, you have ‘improved’ your capacity to endure dislike.

Although liking is relatively pleasant because the full impact of the application of the force of going against self is constantly shielded by a matching opposing rise in the force of self preservation, it is nevertheless stressing the consciousness by subjecting it to constantly changing force and therefore after a while the foolish person’s enthusiasm or liking is curbed or brought to a more tolerable baseline level.

The baseline consciousness experience by all ordinary people is actually dislike not like because life is never truly pleasurable but even very stressful or demanding and a lot of the expressed liking is actually faked to please and impress others. Only on relatively rare occasions do people experience genuine liking.


NEITHER LIKING NOR DISLIKING IS EXPERIENCED IF THE PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF DOES NOT RISE AND FALL IN SPEED AND STRENGTH IN AN UNDULATING FASHION OR RISE IN AN UNABATED FASHION ON SEEING, HEARING, TOUCHING, TASTING OR SMELLING ANYTHING. THIS HAS NEVER BEEN EXPERIENCED BY ORDINARY PEOPLE EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION THEY HAVE AND YOU ACTUALLY EXPERIENCE WHATEVER YOU SEE, HEAR, TOUCH, TASTE AND SMELL INCOMPARABLY BETTER IF YOU NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE.

FEAR IS THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE WHEN THE PERSON’S FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION RISES UNABATED IN SPEED AND STRENGTH WITH A CONCOMITTANT FALL IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF HIS FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF AS A RESULT OF SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING OR TOUCHING SOMETHING. THE NET EFFECT IS TO PULL THE EMOTIONAL PERSON AWAY FROM THE OBJECT BECAUSE THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ALWAYS OPPOSES THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT IS ALWAYS THE MOTIVATING FORCE IN ALL PERCEIVING.

SADNESS OR DESPAIR MAY BE THE CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE AT THE OCCURRENCE OF SOMETHING THAT IS DISLIKED BUT ON REALIZATION OF ITS HOPELESSNESS OR INEVITABLE LOSS, THE UNABATED RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS ALLOWED TO DIE WITHOUT NEED FOR BEING PEGGED BY THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION. THIS UNREQUITED DISLIKE OF WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS USUALLY REDIRECTED IN FOOLISH FRUSTRATION AT HIS SELF IN RECRIMINATION TO AMPLIFY HIS PAIN. THIS CYCLE OF DISLIKE FOR WHAT HAS HAPPENED AUGMENTED BY DISLIKE FOR SELF THAT THEN FADES AWAY IN HOPELESSNESS IS USUALLY IRRATIONALLY REPEATED IN CONDITIONING CYCLES SO THAT HIS CAPACITY TO AROUSE AND MAINTAIN SADNESS OF INTENSIFYING STRENGTH INCREASES WITH TIME AND HE IS HEADED FOR MAD UNCONTROLLABLE SADNESS OR DEPRESSION.
SADNESS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT IT IS AN ADDICTIVE CONDITIONING CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCE GENERATED BY A PATTERN OF FORCE CHANGES AS A RESULT OF PERCEIVED LOSS THAT CANNOT BE RECTIFIED AND SO YOU ARE FOOLISH TO TOLERATE OR INDULGE YOUR SADNESS BECAUSE IT IS A CANCER THAT WILL SPREAD.
Confusion:
All ordinary people must suffer from confusion that instead of alarming them that it is suffering that also inexorably conditions them to greater confusion that will become malignant they accept it with stoicism as blameless fact of life.
All ordinary people must suffer from confusion because they are constantly forcefully going against themselves in all their activities that have added unnecessary force, changes in speed and strength of force that must confuse their minds, the simultaneous substance and style in theirs and everybody’s speech and actions divides the attention of their consciousness, they in addition say and do things that are the opposite of what they mean (sarcasm, telling you that you are so smart when they mean you are stupid) that confuses them. In addition they faked they are confused when they are not to deceive others but this also conditions them to confusion.
THUS THE NATURAL STATE OF ORDINARY PEOPLE’S MIND IS ACTUALLY CONFUSION THAT THEY ARE ONLY FORCEFULLY KEEPING IN CONTROL AND WHENEVER THEY DESCEND INTO CONFUSION IT SIGNIFIES MOMENTARY LOSS OF CONTROL AND THIS WILL BE THE FINAL STATE OF THEIR MINDS IF THEY DO NOT MAKE MEANINGFUL EFFORTS TO RECTIFY BY PRACTICING NOT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS & NOT TELLING LIES.
As the Buddha said, the person who is heading for heaven dies unconfused, if you can be easily confused, easily panicked, you will die in confusion and head for perdition.
PEOPLE TODAY HAVE MERELY TURNED DOWN THE VOLUME OF THEIR ACTING, THEY HAVE NOT GIVEN UP THEIR WILL TO MANIPULATE & HURT EACH OTHER AND THEY MAY BE KIDDING THEMSELVES THEY ARE HEADED FOR SAFETY. UNTIL YOU ARE NOT VULNERABLE TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE YOU ARE NOT SAFE. JESUS SAID YOU MUST BE PERFECT AS YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN IS PERFECT. HOW PERFECT ARE YOU WHEN YOU CAN SUDDENLY BECOME STRESSED, RESTLESS AND UNABLE TO CONCENTRATE? DO YOU THINK YOUR FATHER IN HEAVEN CAN BE CONFUSED LIKE YOU?

Sarcasms Can Never Be Denied:

Contrary to popular misconception (or wrong view that has serious implications) that sarcasm (saying things that you do not mean) is something that the victim cannot establish conclusively and a clever perpetrator can successfully deny so that nobody can know for sure, sarcasm is not a subjective diagnosis but sarcasm is an objective diagnosis, not just sometimes but ALL THE TIME.

Therefore if you are sarcastic, you will not escape the punishment for not meaning what you say (telling a lie) and if you deny it is sarcastic, you instead counter accuse the victim of being oversensitive you are foolishly asking for even more punishment.

I had passed comments about the furor generated in Australia by inflammatory remarks made by a Muslim clergyman. Subsequently, I had sent additional comments but mistakenly headlined the email as “Correction” (which I had realized afterwards) when it should have been ‘Addendum’. He seized on this erroneous labeling to attack me:

He said: If your original message was intended to enlighten, why did it need correction?
Comment: Why can his comment be proven to be sarcastic, something that he denied but instead accused me of seeing slights where there were none?

What is the big deal about my comments about what the cleric said that he should deem I was trying to enlighten him and therefore my correction renders my comments non-enlightening?

Do people routinely treat comments made to them by others about current affairs as intentions by others to enlighten them? If they don't why should he accord such lordly status to my comments?

Do people routinely question those who subsequently corrected their comments “If your original message was intended to enlighten, why did it need correction?”

If people don’t do so, why should he accord special treatment for my comments except that he is either mad or he has ulterior motive to use the opportunity to snipe at me by innuendo that therefore I am not perfect and whatever I have said in the past is suspect.

Did I say to him that my comments on the cleric were meant to enlighten him? If I did not say so; is he crazy to question why I am correcting comments that are meant to enlighten him or is he insinuating, not saying what he has in mind and not meaning what he says?

Does he really think that my comments on the cleric can enlighten anybody?

Indefensible:
WHOEVER ASKS ANOTHER “IF YOUR COMMENTS ARE MEANT TO ENLIGHTEN, WHY DOES IT NEED CORRECTION” IS ATTACKING HIM, ASKING HIM TO QUESTION OR DOUBT HIMSELF, NOT ADDRESSING ISSUES (IF HE SAID ‘YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT THE CLERIC ARE INACCCURATE’, HE IS ADDRESSING A SPECIFIC ISSUE, MERELY SAYING RIGHTFULLY OR WRONGFULLY HE FINDS MY COMMENTS INACCURATE).

HE IS TRYING TO SOW DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY IN ME THAT IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA AND THEREFORE HE HAS WICKEDNESS THAT NOT ONLY IS HURTFUL NOW BUT CONDITIONS ME TO DOUBT MYSELF THAT WILL CONSIGN ANYONE WHO IS GULLIBLE TO PERDITION. YOU ARE NOT ONLY PROFFERING SHIT TO THE OTHER PERSON BUT YOU ARE PROFFERING SHIT DISGUISED AS FOOD.

WHEN PETER SAID HE WILL NEVER FALL AWAY, JESUS DID NOT DOUBT HIM, DID NOT ASK HIM “ARE YOU SURE?” BUT JESUS SAID WHAT HE THOUGHT THAT WAS DIFFERENT: TRULY I SAY TO YOU, YOU WILL DENY ME THREE TIMES BEFORE THE COCK CROWS.

He tried to excuse himself by saying that ‘enlighten’ is acceptable in his parlance.

The plausible alternatives to ‘enlighten’ that I can think of are ‘true’, ‘correct’ or ‘accurate’ or ‘final’. Whatever words he may care to substitute makes no sense.

Why should he expect that my comments about the cleric should be absolutely true or correct or accurate or final that I should not need to correct them? Does he demand the same standard from everyone else? If he doesn’t, why should he demand such uncompromising standards of me unless he is either mad or he has ulterior unspoken motive that because I am supposed to be the counselor, he expects me to be ‘word perfect’ and by correcting myself in this instance, it debunks or totally discredits any pretensions I have of being the counselor. But he never said this, he was merely guiding me to make this conclusion myself, he is wicked plying sugar laced poison to me. If you think this is fun, wait until your turn comes for someone to feed you with food that has shit mixed inside it that they want you believe is pure food.

NO ONE ENJOYS BEING HURT BY CAUSTIC COMMENTS THAT THEY CAN SENSE HOWEVER VAGUELY FROM OTHERS THAT THEY USUALLY REFLEXIVELY TRY TO HIDE BY SMILING THAT COMPOUNDS THEIR HURT. NOWADAYS PEOPLE CANNOT HURT ME BY INNUENDOS BECAUSE I CAN SEE THEIR EVIL CONCEALED INTENT, I HAVE NO EMOTIONS, NO PRIDE THAT CAN BE HIJACKED BY OTHERS BUT HE IS A FOOL WHO CAN BE HURT BY ANYONE AND WHO CAN BE PUNISHED BY GOD BECAUSE HE POSSESSES STRONG EMOTIONS THAT HE WILL NOT GIVE UP THAT CAN BE HIJACKED BY OTHERS, THAT GOD CAN HARNESS TO PUNISH HIM.
(THE MUSLIM CLERIC WAS SUBJECT TO INTENSE PUBLIC PRESSURE, FORCED TO STAND DOWN AND SUFFERED A COLLAPSE. WHAT HE SAID WAS CORRECT THAT WOMEN WHO DRESSED PROVOCATIVELY ARE ASKING TO BE RAPED BUT HE WAS WRONG TO USE DISRESPECTFUL EMOTIONAL WORDS LIKE ‘UNCOVERED MEAT’ TO REFER TO WOMEN. THOSE WHO SUBJECTED HIM TO UNFAIR CONDEMNATION, WHO FEEL AUSTRALIAN WOMEN HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO DRESS AS THEY PLEASE, WHO DROOL AND ENCOURAGE WOMEN TO EXPOSE THEMSELVES ARE ALL HEADED FOR PERDITION)
A FATAL BLOW TO MY CREDIBILITY?
IT IS FALSE NAIVE OR FOOLISH LOGIC THAT WILL CULMINATE IN MAD LOGIC IF HE BELIEVES THAT AS A RESULT OF MY CORRECTING WHAT THE CLERIC SAID (WHICH I DID NOT) IT DEALS A FATAL BLOW TO MY CREDIBILITY OR CREDENTIALS.
ALL THAT I SAY ARE MATTERS FOR DISCERNMENT NOT FAITH. THERE IS NO USE IN BELIEVING WHAT I SAY AS YOU MUST HAVE FAITH IN SOME OF THE THINGS JESUS SAID LIKE THAT THERE IS ETERNAL LIFE IN HEAVEN. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, NO MARA (SATAN) OR BRAHMA (GOD) OR BEINGS IN THE COSMOS CAN OVERTURN WHAT HE SAID. SIMILARLY NO ONE CAN OVERTURN WHAT I SAY THAT THE CONSTANT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INALIENABLE ELIMINABLE ROOT TO THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT BESET ALL BEINGS INCLUDING INSECTS IN THIS WORLD THAT WILL UNFAILINGLY END IN MAD STRESS, MAD RESTLESSNESS AND MAD INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE BECAUSE IT IS UNIVERSALLY TRUE.
THEREFORE IF YOU BELIEVE MY CORRECTING MY COMMENTS ABOUT THE CLERIC FATALLY WOUNDS MY CREDIBILITY, NEGATE ALL THE THINGS I HAVE SAID THAT NO MAN HAS SAID BEFORE, THEN YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC THAT YOU DO NOT REALIZE WILL DESCEND INTO FINAL MAD PERCEPTION AND LOGIC.

WHEN YOU PERCEIVE THERE ARE ANTS BITING YOU ALL OVER THAT IS MAD PERCEPTION. WHEN YOU JUMP OFF A BUILDING OR HANG YOURSELF YOU ARE DOING WHAT IS FATAL TO YOURSELF AND THAT IS MAD LOGIC AND ULTIMATE GOING AGAINST SELF.

MAD DOUBT:
Mad doubt is when you cannot believe something no matter how many times and in how many ways you have been assured and it is the final destination of people who always question others.
Mad logic is when you think that 1+1=3 and it is the result of people keep telling lies and willing themselves and their victims to believe that their lies are true.
Mad perception is when you see things that are not really there (ants crawling all over you) and you do not see things that are really there (eg stretching & speed changes in your speech). Paranoia is a form of mad perception.

IT IS ACTUALLY AN EXAMPLE OF MAD DOUBT THAT CANNOT BE ASSUAGED THAT PEOPLE KEEP QUESTIONING MY CREDENTIALS DESPITE MY REPEATED REITERATIONS WHAT ALL I SAY ARE MATTERS FOR DISCERNMENT NOT FAITH THAT IS INDEPENDENT OF MY NATURE, IF WHAT I SAY IS TRUE AND BENEFICIAL, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER I AM OR AM NOT THE COUNSELOR AND IF I HAVE COVERED CRUCIALLY OR VIRTUALLY EVERYTHING THAT IS OF IMPORTANCE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO SAY WHAT I SAY IF HE IS TO TEACH YOU EVERYTHING AND BENEFIT YOU. IF I HAVE DONE SO, I WOULD HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM.
IT IS MAD DOUBT THAT DETRACTORS CAN SEIZE ON ANYTHING I SAY AND SAY THAT DOES NOT PROVE I AM THE COUNSELOR. FOR INSTANCE THEY SAY THAT EVEN IF I MATCH THE CRITERIA JESUS DESCRIBED, THAT DOES NOT MEAN I MUST BE THE COUNSELOR, EVEN IF I CHANGED THE WORLD’S CONSCIOUSNESS AS JESUS SEEMED TO HAVE ALLUDED TO, THAT DOES NOT MEAN I AM THE COUNSELOR, EVEN IF WHAT I HAVE COMPREHENSIVELY PRESENTED ARE TRUE AND BENEFICIAL SO THAT I WILL HAVE RENDERED THE COUNSELOR REDUNDANT, THAT DOES NOT MEAN I AM THE COUNSELOR. YES IT DOES NOT PROVE I AM THE COUNSELOR BUT WHY ARE YOU SO OBSESSED BY MY BEING THE COUNSELOR INSTEAD OF CONFRONTING YOUR OWN SHORTCOMINGS? THEY ARE OBSESSED WITH KNOWING FOR CERTAIN WHEN THEIR MAD DOUBT IS AN INSURMOUNTABLE STUMBLING BLOCK, NOT REALIZING THAT THEY ARE EVEN NOW CONDITIONING THEMSELVES TO MORE INTENSE DOUBT THAT WILL END IN MADNESS.
ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE ONLY ALWAYS FORCEFULLY CERTAIN, NEVER PASSIVELY EMOTION FREE CERTAIN. THEY ALWAYS USE FORCE OR EMOTION TO EMPHASIZE THAT THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY SURE OF WHAT THEY SAY AND DO BUT BECAUSE THIS IS BACKED BY FORCE AND THE APPLICATION OF MENTAL FORCE IS STRESSFUL AND EXHAUSTING, AS SOON AS THEIR APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THEIR MINDS WEAKEN AS A RESULT OF STRESS OR TIREDNESS, THEY BECOME ASSAILED BY DOUBT WHAT THEY HAD JUST SO CONFIDENTLY ASSERTED THEY ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN.

THUS ORDINARY PEOPLE’S CERTAINTY ARE FORCEFULLY ASSERTED TO IMPRESS OTHERS, THEY FORCEFULLY ASSERT AS TRUE OR GENUINE WHAT THEY SAY OR DO BUT AS SOON AS THE GRIP OF FORCE WEAKENS BECAUSE OF STRESS OR TIREDNESS, THEIR SUPPRESSED DOUBT RISE TO HAUNT THEM.

THE IRONY THAT IS LOST ON THEM IS THAT THEY EXPECT OTHERS, THE BUDDHA, THE COUNSELOR AND JESUS TO BE WHITER THAN WHITE (IF YOU UNDERSTOOD THE BUDDHA, THIS WORLD IS ULTIMATELY DECEPTIVE OR FALSE OR FLAWED OR TAINTED, ONLY UNBINDING OR NIRVANA IS TRUE) BUT THEY HAVE LITTLE EXPECTATIONS FOR PERFECTION IN THEMSELVES, WHEN IT SUITS THEM EMOTIONALLY (FALSE HUMILITY) THEY WILL READILY ADMIT THAT THEY ARE INDEED FAR FROM PERFECT BUT THEY GET ANGRY IF I POINT OUT TO THEM CALMLY HOW THEY ARE STRETCHING THEIR SYLLABLES AND THEY THINK THAT DESPITE THEIR ADMITTED BEING FAR FROM PERFECT, THEY CAN NEVERTHELESS SEE AND TELL WHAT IS TRUE AND FALSE, THEY CAN TELL WHAT IS HOLY AND NOT, WHO CAN AND CANNOT BE THE COUNSELOR WHEN THEY WERE NOT EVEN AWARE ALL ALONG DESPITE REGULARLY READING THE BIBLE THAT JESUS WAS FORETELLING A COUNSELOR TO COME.

NOBODY IS TRULY HAPPY IN THIS WORLD (WHICH IS WHY JESUS CAN TRUTHFULLY SAY THAT THE COUNSELOR IS TO YOUR ADVANTAGE TO COME) BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL BESET BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT ARE THE INEVITABLE RESULTS OF THEIRS AND OTHERS’ UNIVERSAL SUBSTANCE AND STYLE BEHAVIOR. JUST AS WOMEN PUT MAKE UP, PUT ON A GORGEOUS SMILE & WEAR THE BEST CLOTHES THEY THINK MAKE THEM IMPRESSIVE BEFORE THEY GO OUT EVERY MORNING TO FAKE THEY ARE HAPPY AND WELL ADJUSTED WHEN INSIDE THEY ARE SEETHING, HIDING AND SUPPRESSING SERIOUS MENTAL VIOLITIONS THAT REGULARLY THREATEN TO REND THEM ASUNDER, PEOPLE ARE ONLY FAKING THEY ARE WELL ADJUSTED AND ENJOYING THEMSELVES HERE TO FALSELY IMPRESS, GET ALONG AND HIDE THEIR TRUE SUFFERING. AND IN THIS SETTING THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY OUT OF THIS PREDICAMENT THAT IF NOT CORRECTED UNFAILINGLY LEAD TO FINAL LOSS OF CONTROL AND MADNESS: STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, STOP CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT HAVE EQUIVALENTS IN MOTION, THOUGHT AND PERCEPTION. IF WHAT I SAY ABOVE THAT NO MAN HAS EVER SAID TO YOU BEFORE THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR MUST ALSO SAY THIS IN SOME FORM AND IF I HAVE SAID SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM. SO, WHY BE OBSESSED AS TO WHETHER I AM THE COUNSELOR?

Why The World Cannot Know Who The Counselor Is:

Because Jesus said so; he said the counselor is ‘the spirit of truth whom the world cannot receive (welcome) because it neither sees nor knows him’.
Jesus could have used ‘many’ instead of ‘the world’ and the fact that he used ‘the world’ may indicate that very few will receive him because they can know (work out by reason) not see him. Jesus said you ‘know’ him, he did not say you can ‘see’ him.

If the counselor has a halo around his head or wings on his back that others do not have, he can miraculously heal the sick and bring the dead to life (which will create a worldwide stampede to his door), he is a prominent dignitary so that you are in no doubt he dwells with you or he dwells in your mind, Jesus will not have to inform you that he dwells with you. It is precisely because the counselor will not have self identifying marks, he is not prominent and you do not know about his presence that Jesus has to tell you he dwells with you.

If Jesus wanted to identify the counselor with certainty, he could have done so and the fact that he did not indicates it might not be necessary or tenable, bearing in mind King Herod ordered all male offspring killed when he heard of the birth of the messiah.

Thus if you cannot see or know who the counselor is, there are two possibilities:
a) You are competent to tell who he can or cannot be but he hasn’t come or he is merely a mental counselor.
b) He has come but you do not realize you are part of the world that Jesus described as being unable to receive or welcome him because it neither sees nor knows him.

It is not just because Jesus said so that it is so but it can be reasoned or worked out logically why the world cannot know who the counselor is.

The reason is that, much as mankind likes to believe it is made of better stuff, it is barking up the wrong tree as far as truth and virtue are concerned. How can someone barking up the wrong tree find someone on the right tree? If truth is A and virtue is B and this world thinks truth is X and virtue is Z, how can it see true truth and virtue?
The Buddha: "What others call happiness (liking and disliking, saying and doing much more) that the Noble Ones declare to be suffering. What others call suffering (not liking and disliking, letting their yes be yes only) that the Noble Ones have found to be happiness. See how difficult it is to understand the Dhamma. For those under the veil (of ignorance) it is obscured, for those who cannot see it is utter darkness. But for the good and the wise it is as obvious as the light for those who can see. Even though close to it, the witless who do not know the Dhamma, do not comprehend it.
In accordance with what the Buddha said above, the values of the masses are the opposite of those of the noble ones or the sons of light, they are under the veil and cannot see, for them it is utter darkness, so how can they see and know what is noble, know and tell who the counselor is?

Virtually everything in terms of conduct and speech that the world upholds as true and beneficial are false and bad for themselves and others (eg smiling, laughing, never letting their yes be yes only but saying and doing much more that comes from evil, constant stressful stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness that have equivalents in motion, thinking and way they see, hear, touch, smell and taste).

How can people who cannot see themselves doing so even after it has been pointed out to them or see nothing wrong or even think that their constant stretching, changing of speed and loudness is true or necessary and beneficial to themselves and others when they are instead the surefire roots to the unnecessary stress, restlessness and distraction that afflict them and will turn mad, see and know the truth and therefore know who the counselor is? If they cannot see themselves constantly hurting themselves and others and even exalt it, how can they see someone who represents the opposite, constantly not hurting self and others?
Thus if you are convinced I cannot be the counselor, it may be that you are qualified to divine or it may be that you are part of this world that Jesus described who cannot who the counselor is. Doubting me is a very risky if not suicidal venture because by the Buddha’s various criteria I am a noble person (eg I have abandoned restlessness and stress, I effortlessly neither like nor dislike, I am without doubt and uncertainty, I sleep and wake easy, dream no evil dream) and he said whoever reviles the noble ones are headed for perdition:
The Buddha: 'These beings -- who were endowed with bodily, verbal & mental misconduct; who reviled noble ones, held wrong views and undertook actions under the influence of wrong views -- at the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in the plane of deprivation, the bad destination, the lower realms, in hell.
EVEN NOBLE ONES NEVER CHANGED THE WORLD’S CONSCIOUSNESS NOT ONCE BUT TWICE, EVEN THEY DO NOT TEACH YOU THE ONLY WAY PERMANENTLY OUT OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, NAMELY DO NOT STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS. THEREFORE I MUST BE A NOBLE ONE OF SOME UNIQUENESS.
Rather than a passport to glory and fame, to be the counselor may instead be a passport to ridicule and vilification because as Jesus said, if the world hates you, know that it hated him first and they hated him without reason. To think the counselor will be adulated may be perverted logic.
Quote: I too have changed the world.
Comment: By saying he too has changed the world, he is implying his real or imagined changing of the world is just as valid as mine and this is intended to cut me down to size. The apparent intention is to inform me that he has changed the world but his real underlying intention is emotional, to provoke or upset me, to introduce doubt that only I could change the world with reference to consciousness changes that I triggered.

THERE IS BASIS FOR MY SAYING I CHANGED THE WORLD’S CONSCIOUSNESS IN AN UNPRECEDENTED WAY AND IT IS THE OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE FACT THAT STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INALIENABLE ROOT OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT CAN BE PERMANENTLY CURED.

My current calm clearly thinking effortlessly concentrating consciousness state that cannot be easily disrupted for long by others is unthinkable for me before 1977, cannot be mistaken by me anymore than I can mistake night for day and I can see by their demeanor and behavior that everyone has changed even though they all still act and therefore I am not deluding myself to think I have changed myself (without imitating anyone else) in an extraordinary way.

I have consistently said many other things that I can confidently say no man has said before that would have been impossible for me to say without consciousness changes eg how there are two mental forces opposing each other, how emotions are nothing more than the basic like and dislike in fancy dress for different occasions and how like and dislike are the only two alternative ways with which mental force can change. I have defined the nature of fear.

I have proven the Buddha is correct in many instances that no man has ever done that it would have been unthinkable for me to say before the consciousness changes.

For instance the Buddha said the noble person has abandoned restlessness. I have proven that restlessness is the inevitable result of the constant forceful changes in speed and strength of force in the speech, motion, thinking and way of perceiving. By training to speak and move with constant speed and strength of force you permanently exit restlessness, something unimaginable in the past.

The Buddha said the noble person neither likes nor dislikes. I have proven that this is indeed possible because you effortless neither like nor dislike if you train not to allow your mental force of going against self to either rise and fall with undulating speed and strength or rise with unabated strength and force.

And what is the basis of his saying he too have changed the world?

Quote: How is it possible (for him) to exist in the world without changing it?

Comment: By conveniently, deviously neglecting to tell me that the basis of his also changing the world is his very existence in it, he wanted me to believe that my changing the world is no big deal, he too has done it. He might think it is very funny to speak thus tongue in cheek, but if God does not find it humorous (Jesus said what is exalted by men that may include humor or mischief is an abomination in the sight of God), he is asking for big trouble.
HAVE THERE BEEN CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES?
IT REFLECTS THE SCALE OF MANKIND’S DENIAL OR PRETENSE THAT NO ONE, EVEN THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD AND DISCERNING, HAS EVER ADMITTED TO ANY CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES THAT ARE BLATANT HAVING OCCURRED, SO THAT I AM MADE TO FEEL THAT PERHAPS I AM MAD OR BLOWING MY OWN TRUMPET TO ASSERT THUS. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WERE THEMSELVES NOT THE CAUSE, THEY FEAR RIDICULE, ARE NOT CERTAIN WHAT TO MAKE OF THESE CHANGES AND THEY ARE STILL SUFFERING THAT HAVE ALL TURNED A BLIND EYE TO THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES.

NEVERTHELESS, WHETHER THERE HAVE BEEN CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES IS NOT A SUBJECTIVE MATTER BUT IT CAN BE OBJECTIVELY DETERMINED.

IF THERE WERE NO CONSCIOUSNES CHANGES AND I AM DELUDING MYSELF, THEN I SHOULD BE DESCENDING INTO MAD PERCEPTION OR PARANOIA. THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE MY CURRENT PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE INCREASING FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IS AS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IT WAS BEFORE 1977 AS DAY IS FROM NIGHT AND DOES NOT PORTEND FUTURE MADNESS. FURTHER I CAN SEE FROM THEIR GREATER PRESENCE, SPEECH AND BEHAVIOR THAT EVERYONE HAS CHANGED YET AGAIN IN RECENT YEARS (ALTHOUGH THEY ARE ALL STILL EMOTIONALLY ACTING).

IF THESE CHANGES I EXPERIENCED ONLY OCCURRED IN ME, THEN I AM AN EVEN TRULY MORE UNIQUE BEING IN CHANGING IN AN UNPRECEDENTED MANNER WHERE NO ONE ELSE HAS CHANGED.

THEREFORE IF THERE HAVE BEEN CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES AND YOU ARE IN DOUBT & UNCERTAINTY AS TO WHETHER THEY HAVE OCCURRED, YOU ARE FALSE PERCEPTION AND ARE HEADED FOR FUTURE MAD OR UNCONTROLLABLE DOUBT OF WHAT HAPPENS DID NOT HAPPEN.

TO ATTACK SOMEONE DIRECTLY SO THAT HE KNOWS YOU ARE ATTACKING HIM IS ITSELF EVIL, BUT TO ATTACK IN A DEVIOUS OR DISGUISED WAY BY QUESTIONING HIM AS IF IT IS AN GENUINE QUESTION, TO PLY HIM WITH SUGAR LACED POISON IS EVEN MORE WICKED.

TO TELL ME THAT YOU TOO HAVE CHANGED THE WORLD ON A FLIMSY PREMISE THAT YOU CONVENIENTLY DID NOT MENTION SO AS TO MAKE ME DOUBT THE VALUE OF MY ACHIEVEMENT IS WICKED AND IF YOU DO IT WITH INSOUCIANCE THINKING IT IS JUST A JOKE, GOOD FOR A LAUGH IS SICK. THUS HOW CAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE A PERVERSION OF WHAT IS FALSE AND HARMFUL TO HIMSELF AND OTHERS IS GOOD FOR HIMSELF AND ME KNOW WHO CAN BE THE COUNSELOR?
The Buddha: So long as an evil deed has not ripened, the fool thinks it as sweet as honey. But when the evil deed ripens, the fool comes to grief.
Should a person commit evil, let him not do it again and again. Let him not find pleasure therein, for painful is the accumulation of evil.
Quote Headline: Fed Up.
Comment: When you say you are fed up you are expressing emotional dislike at a situation that has nothing to do with reason. Have you heard Jesus or the Buddha say they are fed up with this or that? People think nothing about saying they are fed up but rather than meritorious or harmless, it is conditioning them to dislike things and encouraging others to follow suit and conditioning yourself further to emotional dislike that they cannot believe will end in agony and insanity.
A person who lets his yes be yes only, who denies himself is never fed up with anything, he accepts everything that happens; either he rectifies it or if nothing can be done, he does not complain, moan and groan.
Quote Dick Cheney: Increased Iraq violence linked to US polls.
Comment: Did he ask the terrorists that their increased violence is linked to the polls? If not he is speculating, saying something he has no right to say. What he is saying may be because he truly madly perceived that it is the case or it has ulterior motive aimed at galvanizing US voters to deny the terrorists by voting Republican. Whatever it is, he is inexorably conditioning himself to false perception that what he presumes without ascertaining is true that will end in mad perception (eg ants crawling all over your body when there is nothing).

Separating What The Church & Jesus Taught:

It was not Jesus but it was the church that taught you that the sun revolved around the earth and it is not just here but it may be in many places that the church had contravened what Jesus taught.
Anyone who seizes upon scientifically untenably teaching by the church to impute that what Jesus taught is false has false logic that will end in mad logic.

It seemed the church was so vindictive it even dug up to burn the bones of the man who first translated without approval the bible into English. It is said that the Old Testament had been repeatedly revised so what you read today is not necessarily what was originally written.

Just as the New Testament was written decades later, what the Buddha taught was only put down in words four centuries later. Prior to this it was transmitted by oral tradition by groups of dedicated monk assigned to recite different verses and correcting each other for mistakes.

The reason why Jesus did not teach you about the sun is because in practical terms it does matter whether the sun revolves around the earth or the earth revolves around the sun to a person who is denying himself and carrying his cross to go away with Jesus, it only matters for people who are totally immersed in their lives here, who believe in this world.

Just as there are significant differences in versions of the Pali Canon by different authors, there may be significant differences between what is in the bible today and what was originally there.

For instance the Buddha was purported to have said that like the dust on his fingertip compared to the great earth, few are ‘reborn’ and ‘born’ here in two differing versions, far more are born elsewhere.

Reborn is the wrong translation because it would mean that almost nobody are reborn as humans after they die, much less go to heaven.
If the Buddha meant ‘born’, it means that like the dust on the Buddha’s fingertip compared to the great earth, an infinitude of beings are being born in hell, the animal even plant worlds, ghost and heavenly realms compared to the human realm and so it is an extreme rarity to be born a human and although very few go to heaven or are reborn as humans, it is not as few as the dust on his fingertip compared to the great earth.
In another occasion, the Buddha was said to have (disrespectfully) thrown the body of a vanquished demon who attacked him into his alms bowl whilst another version that is likely right said he placed it in his bowl.

No comments: