Questioning Others:

Who is Ava Gardner?
It is false logic and perception that people are totally unaware and they do not believe will end in mad logic and perception that this person asked me “Who is Ava Gardner?” when I said that Ava Gardner said that love is nothing but pain. The answer to the question “Who is Ava Gardner” is that she is a film star which she already knows and it is false logic and perception that you are questioning her authority to make that statement that love is nothing but pain. She is hinting and indirectly questioning or doubting me. If I did not believe Ava Gardner was right I would not have quoted her and so instead of respecting my view and telling me that she disagreed with what Ava Gardner said merely on the basis that she is no authority on love, she is trying to raise doubt in me that is never harmless but conditions anyone who is foolish to succumb to doubt himself.
Thus, not only has the person false logic and perception to think “who is Ava Gardner” is the appropriate question for the answer she desires, she is creating karma for herself by trying to induce doubt in another person that may send him to future states of woe.
Placebo Effect:
When doctors give identical pills that have no medicine in it, a sizeable number of people report that it is effective. This is the placebo effect.
The placebo effect is a demonstration of false perception that will end in mad perception that people can make themselves believe and experience as effective what is actually ineffective (pill with only sugar).
It is again false perception that everyone is vulnerable to be similarly duped by pills that are in truth duds.
Only those who are emotional, who want to believe things that they are presented with that they have no right to believe (presumptuous), who can be brainwashed can report placebos as effective.
It is not harmless for doctors to prescribe placebos eg vitamins and tell patients it will work to cure their maladies because there is karma trying to make others make belief something that does not work, works.
An unemotional person without any anticipation that something will work, who does not desperately desire a cure, who is fully in touch with his body and mind will not notice any significant changes in his mind and body as a result of the placebo and therefore cannot be duped that what is a placebo is effective.
THUS IT IS ONLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE RESIDENT FALSE PERCEPTION WHO CAN BE CONDITIONED OR DUPED TO PERCEIVE PLACEBOS ARE EFFECTIVE AND THEY DO NOT REALIZE THEY ARE HEADED FOR MAD PERCEPTION.
QUESTION RULES:
ASK ANOTHER PERSON QUESTIONS BY ALL MEANS BUT DO NOT HINT BECAUSE IT IS DISHONEST AND FLIRTING WITH FUTURE MADNESS. FOR INSTANCE DO NOT ASK WHO AVA GARDNER IS WHEN YOU KNOW WHO SHE IS, YOU MEAN YOU DISLIKE WHAT I QUOTED HER SAYING OR YOU THINK SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED TO SAY WHAT SHE SAID.
NEVER QUESTION WHAT SOMEONE SAID TO YOU OR SOMEONE’S DECISION (EG SHE WANTS TO BUY THIS DRESS, YOU ASK HER ARE YOU SURE) BECAUSE IT IS CREATING DOUBT IN HER THAT LEADS TO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY. INSTEAD STATE WHAT YOU THINK OR SEE IS DIFFERENT EG I THINK IT IS NOT WISE TO BUY THAT DRESS.

THERE IS NEVER JUSTIFICATION TO DOUBT WHAT ANOTHER PERSON SAY BUT THAT DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN YOU MUST ACCEPT WHAT HE SAID, IF NECESSARY YOU MERELY SAY WHAT YOU THINK OR SEE THAT DIFFERS.
Quote Headline: Shady dealings.
Comment: The headline was in respect to the successful auction for $70,000 for a pair of sunglasses worn by actor Steve McQueen in the film Thomas Crown Affair.
People find it cute misleading others who read the headline and imagine it is an illegal deal when the shade is in respect to the sunglasses and the deal is in the successful auction. This is false perception and logic that the person who issues and those who appreciate do not realize will end in truly mad logic and perception for them.
If you like to play with words so that your words can have plural or more than one meaning, you begin to develop a shadow of doubt in what you and others say so that in time you become suspicious, cannot accept things as you are told, you emotionally feel there must be more to it.

A Liking For Thanking Others:
THROUGH SOCIAL CONDITIONING ALL EMOTIONAL PEOPLE HAVE ACQUIRED A LIKING FOR THANKING OTHERS FOR REAL OR IMAGINED, TRIVIAL OR SIGNIFICANT GOOD DEEDS BY OTHERS.

THIS LIKING FOR THANKING OTHERS IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE UNDULATING RISE AND FALL IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THEIR MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF WHEN THEY SAY 'THANKS' AND HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON, NOTHING TO DO WITH EXPRESSING REASONED APPRECIATION OF WHAT SOMEONE ELSE HAS SAID OR DONE.

JUST BECAUSE YOU LIKE TO SAY THANK YOU, YOU EXPERIENCE LIKE WHEN YOU SAY THANKS DOES NOT MAKE IT MERITORIOUS OR BENEFICIAL FOR THE RECIPIENT BUT IF YOU ARE THANKING HIM FOR SOMETHING HE DID NOT DO OR THAT YOU DISLIKED, THEN YOU ARE HURTING HIM, GENERATING CONFLICT IN HIM WHEN HE FINDS OUT THAT WHAT YOU ARE THANKING HIM IS SOMETHING THAT YOU DID NOT APPRECIATE.

THANKING SOMEONE IS NOT JUST ABOUT YOU LIKING IT BUT IT SHOULD BE FIRST AND FOREMOST A VEHICLE TO EXPRESS YOUR APPRECIATION TO WHAT HE HAS SAID OR DONE THAT YOU ARE TRULY GRATEFUL.

IF YOU START THANKING OTHERS FOR EVERY TRIVIAL THING THEY SAY OR DO, YOU EVEN THANK THEM FOR THINGS YOU REJECT OR DID NOT LIKE YOU DEGRADE THE SOLEMN NATURE OF THANKING ANOTHER AND YOUR THANKS CAN BECOME AN INSTRUMENT OF PERSECUTION OR HURTING OTHERS WHEN THEY FIND THAT YOU ARE THANKING THEM FOR SOMETHING THAT YOU ACTUALLY DISLIKED.

FOR ONE WHO DISCERNS, ORDINARY PEOPLE'S THANKS ARE STEREOTYPED OR REGURGITATED BY ROTE REFLEXIVELY FOR SITUATIONS THEY DEEM APPROPRIATE TO THANK OTHERS AND WHAT GRATIFICATION THEY FIND IN THANKING OTHERS THAT THEY MISTAKE AS THEIR GENUINENESS OR HEARTFELT THANKING IS THE LIKING THEY EXPERIENCE WHEN THEY THANK OTHERS.

The Buddha says singing is crying and dancing is insanity:
The Buddha:
Ruõõasuttaü- Crying
108.Bhikkhus, singing is crying in this discipline of the noble ones and dancing is insanity. Bhikkhus, it is childish to laugh too long showing your teeth. Therefore give up singing, dancing and it is suitable that you, delighting in the Teaching should laugh to a certain extent only.
THEREFORE THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES BUDDHISTS WHO LIKE TO SING, DANCE AND LAUGH ARE ONLY NOMINAL BUDDHISTS, THEY DO NOT HEED THE BUDDHA'S TEACHING.
THEREFORE IF YOU MUST SING, SING WITHOUT STRETCHING NOTES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
NOWADAYS I CANNOT GET MYSELF TO DANCE AND ALL ALONG I WAS NEVER GOOD AT LAUGHING.
The Buddha says I am a rare person:
Bhikkhus, the arising of three things are rare in the world. What three?

The arising of the Thus Gone One, worthy and rightfully enlightened is rare the world.

A person who preaches the Teaching and Discipline declared by the Thus Gone One is rare in the world.

A person who has gratitude and returns it, is rare in the world. Bhikkhus, the arising of these three things are rare in the world.
**

Either the Buddha is talking nonsense, it is no big deal what he taught or what he taught is of cardinal importance towards a deliverance from suffering that may otherwise be as vast as an ocean and as long as an eternity that few could preach or interpret it for others.

There are many who preach what the teaching and discipline but they are only nominal preachers because the Buddha said someone who preaches his teaching is rare.
No one in the past and today apart contemporary elders during the Buddha’s time has shed light on what the Buddha taught as I have done.
For instance I have demonstrated you exit stress by stopping unnecessary forceful stretching of syllables and units of motion, you abandon restlessness as the Buddha said is possible by paying attention to stop changing speed and strength of force in speech and motion. I have explained how why fabrications or activities of the mind are the result of ignorance, how fabrications precede consciousness that comes into being to experience and conduct the fabrications and how the arising of consciousness permits this world of objects to come to being that then necessitates the sensory media to interact and thence the other links of cause and effect.

Again what the Buddha said those who have gratitude are rare. What gratitude people express or experience are rote or regurgitated with a substance and style mix that cannot be unadulterated gratitude, notwithstanding that in truth many, even those who call themselves good have little or no gratitude.

What the Buddha is saying is that the plentiful teachers in the world in the past and today cannot be true teachers of his doctrine because he said it is very rare for someone who preaches his teaching in this world. If you are discerning, you will realize no Buddhist teacher today or in the past except during the Buddha's time has elucidated the Buddha's teaching as I have.


McCartney unwittingly exposing himself:
The former Beatle said: "She is going to take me for £80million, because we now know it's £80million. All she thinks about is dollars." (surely she must think about other things apart from money and this statement is false and malicious).
Paul McCartney can barely restrain himself in the tirade below and even as he berates his former wife he is conditioning himself further to intense restless anger that he will finally lose control to become mad.
Sir Paul is said to have continued: "Everyone knows she is a liar, she even lied in her autobiography. Everybody knows that. (Not everyone knows she is a liar and it is again false and malicious to influence others to believe him)
"She has told so many lies like the one about me being a drunk - just because I go to pubs.
"It's all pack of lies you know, that I am stingy - that's another one.
"And it's all c**p and rubbish. If she doesn't get what she wants she'll pick a fight.
"I am really miserable, bullied actually. It just p***** me off, it is such c**p. I am being described as a b****** and it's not true."
The star has paid £200,000 for 20 hours of tapes of Macca's first wife Linda, which were owned by Mr Cox. Made in the 80s, they reportedly have Linda, who died in 1998, talking of leaving him.
Buddhism & Christianity Are Compatible:
What the Buddha preached and what Jesus taught are compatible.
Anyone who says there is no God in Buddhism is slandering the Buddha because he not only said there is God but He is the Father, All Knowing All Seeing:
Quote: The Great Brahma said, 'I, monk, am Brahma, the Great Brahma, the All-Seeing, All-Powerful, the Maker, Creator, Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be.'
There is heaven and hell in Buddhism & Christianity, Jesus spoke of eternal habitations that may correspond to existence as animals that the Buddha spoke of. There is Mara the Evil One in Buddhism as there is Satan the Evil One in Christianity.
The Buddha said that Great Brahma had two sons that may correspond to the Holy Spirit & Jesus in Christianity.
Subrahma and Paramatta Brahma,together with sons of the Powerful One,Sanankumara and Tissa:They too have come to the forest meeting.Great Brahma, who stands over 1,000 Brahma worlds,who arose there spontaneously, effulgent:Prestigious is he, with a terrifying body.And ten brahma sovereigns, each the lord of his own realm -- and in their midst has comeHarita Brahma surrounded by his retinue."
Jesus spoke of this Age, the close of Age and the next Age whilst the Buddha spoke of eons of cosmic contractions and expansions, he said an eon is enough time for a being transmigration to build a pile of skeleton as high as a mountain instead of eternal life in heaven.
The Buddha said he himself had been the all powerful one but he has grown disenchanted with all existing. Jesus said the Father has is his that may suggest that Jesus will become the Father if the Father should decide to relinquish his position.
Another Tsunami?
Apparently there have been extensive beaching of sea cucumbers along the East Coast of Malaysia just it was reported before the Acheh tsunami and so there are fears that another is about to occur in the South China Sea.
It may be that sea cucumbers are trying to escape being buried if there was a tsunami shifted the sediments on the seabed.
Tsunami-link in gamat landing?
KUALA LUMPUR: The Department of Environment and three other agencies have been ordered to investigate the unusual landing of thousands of sea cucumbers (gamat) on the east coast shores of the peninsula last week.
Thousands of sea cucumbers, reputedly used in a variety of traditional cures, were reportedly washed ashore along the coastlines of Kelantan, Terengganu and Pahang.
The occurrence over the past four days has raised concerns about a possible tsunami happening in the South China Sea and lashing out at the shorelines of the east coast states.
Such unusual phenomenon had happened at Port Dickson just before the tsunami tragedy of Dec 26, 2004.
There was also a similar occurrence off the Malacca coast before the tsunamis struck Aceh province.