Why All Ordinary People Are Hypocrites:

It may be because I speak arrogantly in deprecation that I state that all ordinary people are hypocrites or it may be a cardinal truth about this world that it, including those who tout themselves as good and wise cannot see and therefore cannot accept.
All ordinary people can be proven to those who are discerning to be in general and specifically (in specific instances) to be hypocrites.
All ordinary people must be hypocrites because whatever they do or say have accompanying unnecessary individual styles that have similarities with some others that have no true meaning except it is for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others. Further, a lot of the substance of what they say can be objectively proven to have no true meaning except it is for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.
This style that afflicts all beings in this world (including all animals) is nothing more than their individually varying ways that have similarities with some others of constantly stretching of syllables and units of motion, constant changes in speed and strength of force that they identify with as signifying their individuality or self, that they refuse to or cannot see is the basis of the unnecessary stress, restlessness and distraction that they persecute themselves and all others who come into contact with them.
Further the individually distinct stable styles with which ordinary people render whatever they say, do, think and perceive without need for thinking cannot be produced live specifically for the occasion, but must be regurgitated from memory & recall, they are robots constantly rehashing what they say or do for the occasion at hand and this is hypocrisy because you cannot mean what you say when it is rehashed standardized from memory for the occasion at hand. If whatever you say or do is rehashed by rote to fit the situation at hand, how can you be a genuine person but you are a hypocrite rehashing standardized reactions by rote to fit the occasion?
It is not because I say you have a style that you have a style but style can be objectively defined and demonstrated.
It is not because I say that you stretch your syllables, changed speed or loudness that it is so but it can be demonstrated objectively by someone who understands and discerns, precisely every instance with which you stretched syllables, changed speed and loudness.
IF THE CONSTANT STYLE WITH WHICH YOU SAY THINGS IS ALWAYS WITHOUT MEANING EXCEPT FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, A LARGE PART OF WHAT YOU SAY ARE SIMILARLY MEANINGLESS EXCEPT FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS, HOW CAN YOU MEAN HOW YOU SAY, MEAN WHAT YOU SAID THAT IS FOR SHOW AND THEREFORE YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE WHO SEVERELY UNDERESTIMATE THE EXTENT OF HIS HYPOCRISY?
I HAVE NO FEAR, NO DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY WHEN I DETERMINE SOMEONE, NO MATTER HOW LOFTY OR EXALTED HE IS IN SOCIETY TO BE A HYPOCRITE BECAUSE I CAN SEE CLEARLY IMPARTIALLY WHAT HYPOCRISY IS.
IT MAY BE TRUE YOU ARE NOT A HYPOCRITE OR WHATEVER HYPOCRISY YOU HAVE IS HARMLESS OR TO BENEFIT OTHERS BUT IF YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF THEN ONLY TIME WILL TELL YOU THE FRUITS OF YOUR IMMACULATE SELF DECEPTION THAT YOU ARE GENUINE WHEN YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE LIKE THE REST.
AS THE BUDDHA SAID, SUCH AND SUCH IS VIRTUE, SUCH AND SUCH IS CONCENTRATION, SUCH AND SUCH IS WISDOM, MEANING EVERYTHING IS NOT SUBJECTIVELY BUT CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED OBJECTIVELY THAT APPLIES TO EVERYONE UNIVERSALLY, THEREFORE SUCH AND SUCH IS HYPOCRISY (AND IF I HAVE DEFINED IT AS NO MAN HAS DONE AND IT IS THE TRUTH, THEN WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO SAY SO AND IF I HAVE DONE SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM). AND IF YOU ARE A HYPCRITE AND YOU THINK YOU ARE NOT, YOU HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC THAT WILL CULMINATE ACUTE OR CHRONICALLY IN MAD PERCEPTION AND LOGIC. IF THAT IS SUFFERING EVEN TO TORMENTING LEVELS, THEN IT IS YOUR LOT.
GREAT IS THE GAIN IN CONCENTRATION WHEN IT IS PERFECTED BY VIRTUE, GREAT IS THE GAIN IN WISDOM WHEN IT IS PERFECTED BY CONCENTRATION MEANS THAT YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT WISDOM WITHOUT GREAT CONCENTRATION (MEDITATION IS A MEANS OF CONCENTRATION), YOU CANNOT HAVE GREAT CONCENTRATION WITHOUT VIRTUE. AND SO IT ALL STARTS FROM VIRTUE WHICH IS THE ABSENCE OF HYPOCRISY, NOT TELLING LIES, NOT KILLING EVEN INSECTS, NOT STEALING, NOT INDULGING IN INTOXICANTS AND ILLEGAL SEX.
CONVINCING YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT:
Jesus: And when he comes, he will convince the world concerning sin and righteousness (goodness) and judgment: concerning sin, because they do not believe in me; concerning righteousness, because I go to the Father, and you will see me no more; concerning judgment, because the ruler of this world is judged.
If you truly, totally mean all that you said, nothing more or less that is said must be specific and intended for the occasion and it must be said live, not by rehash for that occasion and what you say must correspond with what you are thinking or have in mind on that occasion, not the opposite or more or less than you have in mind.
The individually characteristic way a person always stretches his syllables, changes speed and loudness, how he smiles or grins or scowls when he speaks cannot be meant for the occasion because it is present on all occasions, is not essential for the what is said (because what is said remains intact if style was removed) but instead the style is meant indirectly, indiscriminately to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others. How many people will admit they mean to deceive, impress, please, dominate and intimidate with the ways they speak? Because they usually deny it or cannot see themselves trying to deceive, impress, please, intimidate & dominate, it cannot be consciously meant but style must be meant in a repressed or unconscious way.
Even if you cannot see it is so, if you are merely an overrated disk jockey not occasionally but always, merely selecting the right tunes to play for the occasion, then you cannot mean what you say but you are faking it, trying to deceive others you are a real live person when you are sophisticated biological tape recorder and playback system.
Whoever you are, you cannot mean what you say if you asked “Who is Ava Gardner?” when you already know who she is and you know I know she was an actress but instead you did not say what you meant which is to doubt what I said she said that love is nothing but pain because you are trying to condescendingly remind me she is an actress not expert on love. This is an example of the substance of what is said being not what is meant that can also embraces the identical consistent style that is always present (eg one person always says ‘thenk kew” whilst another always say “thhaaannkss”).
When you mean what you say then everything in it must be meant, there can be nothing in what is conveyed that is not meant. How can you mean your style that is always present unvarying on every occasion you speak but instead the accompanying style is not mean specifically for the occasion but meant across board to falsely deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate?
When you only say what you mean, then what you say must fully conform to what you are thinking, not contrast or have additions or subtractions. How can you only say what you mean when what you say have an additional style that is meant across board, indiscriminately on every occasion to deceive, impress, please, dominate or intimidate (eg speak angrily to intimidate) others?
THEREFORE IF YOU TRULY MEAN WHAT YOU SAY, YOU TRULY ONLY SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, YOU CANNOT HAVE ANY ACCOMPANYING STYLE THAT IS AN INDISCRIMINATE EVER PRESENT ACCOMPANIMENT THAT CANNOT BE MEAN SPECIFICALLY FOR THAT OCCASION BUT MEANT INDISCRIMINATELY FOR DECEPTION, TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE. FURTHER IF WHAT YOU SAID IS IN TRUTH PRERECORDED AND RETRIEVED TO BE APPLIED YOU THINK IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE OCCASION AT HAND, THEN YOU CANNOT TRULY MEAN IT BUT IT IS AN IMPERSONAL RESPONSE OR FAKED PERSONAL RESPONSE.
If it is true (that I can demonstrate to anyone who cares to consult me) that all ordinary people have constant styles in whatever they say or do and this style is totally unnecessary except to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others and this style stresses, makes restless and distracts themselves and others, in addition this constant consistent style cannot be produced lived but must be painstakingly recorded to be regurgitated impersonally or standardized by rote for any given occasion, a lot of the substance of what they say or do are meaningless, only intended to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, what else is there that any counselor can say that will convince you of sin?
Because the stylish way people say things and a bulk of what they say is intended only to deceive others, impress, please, intimidate and dominate, have no stand alone meaning or reason, they in addition mindlessly operate by regurgitation from mental jukeboxes, they are hypocrites trying to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others in a way that that they have disguised so well they now believe and perceive themselves as genuine.
Apart from what people say or do, how the do or say it, which I have comprehensively covered generally and specifically with the many examples I have given, what is there to enable a person to be hypocritical?
IF THERE IS NOTHING APART FROM WHAT I HAVE DWELT ON THROUGH WHICH A BEING CAN BE HYPOCRITICAL THEN THE COUNSELOR JESUS SPOKE OF MUST ALSO ADDRESS IN SOME FORM WHAT I SAY. IF I HAVE DONE SO, I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM AND HE WILL LOOK FOOLISH IF HE TRIED TO TEACH YOU ALL THINGS AND CONVINCE YOU OF SIN. I CANNOT LOOK FOOLISH IN TRYING TO CONVINCE OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT WITH WHAT I SAY BECAUSE I DID NOT COPY ANYONE, I KNOW WHAT I SAY HAS NEVER BEEN SAID BY OTHERS AND EVEN IF THEY WANTED ORDINARY PEOPLE CANNOT SAY THE THINGS I SAY.
IF SPEECH STYLE HAS NO MEANING EXCEPT TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, SPEAKING BY REHASHING IS FAKED LIVE SPEECH THAT FOOLS THE PERSON AND LISTENERS THAT IT IS LIVE & SAYING THINGS WHOSE SUBSTANCE CANNOT LOGICALLY BE MEANT ARE NOT THE BASIS OF HYPOCRISY, DOES NOT CONVINCE YOU OF THE EXISTENCE OF HYPOCRISY, CAN YOU DEFINE COMPREHENSIVELY WHAT IS HYPOCRISY OR DO YOU FAITHFULLY AWAIT THE COUNSELOR WHO WILL SPEAK AND CONVINCE YOU OF HYPOCRISY WHERE I HAVE FAILED?
IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO SPEAK OF THE THINGS I HAVE SAID BECAUSE WHAT I SAY IS FROWNED UPON BY SOCIETY, ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE TOO ANXIOUS TO IMPRESS AND PLEASE OTHERS (TO MAINTAIN THEMSELVES IN OTHERS’ GOOD BOOKS) AND WHAT I SAY NEVER OCCUR TO THEM.
I KNOW WHAT I SAY IS TRUE BECAUSE I HAVE EXPERIENCED A PREVIOUSLY UNIMAGINABLE EFFORTLESS FREEDOM FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION BY PUTTING TO A STOP ALL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WHILST I CAN DETECT STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN ALL INCLUDING THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD AND WISE, EVEN WHEN THEY ARE TALKING SOFTLY AND SLOWLY AND I CAN DETECT THAT THEY ARE ALL SUFFERING SERIOUSLY FROM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
IF YOU THINK YOU CAN IF YOU WANT TO OR YOU SPEAK WITH CONSTANT SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHOUT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, WHY NOT CONSULT ME AND LET ME SHOW THAT YOU HEAR WITHOUT HEARING, YOU ARE PROOF OF WHAT JESUS SAID THAT SEEING THEY DO NOT SEE THAT THEY ARE CONSTANTLY STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT ARE THE ONLY CAUSES OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT HARMS THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
JESUS’ DESCRIPTION OF THE COUNSELOR MAY BE LIKE GIVING YOU THE NUMBERS OF THE FIRST PRIZE IN A LOTTERY. ANY LOTTERY TICKET THAT COMES ALONG WITH THE NUMBERS THAT MATCHES MUST BE THE COUNSELOR. THE READER’S TASK IS TO DETERMINE IF A LOTTERY HAS THE WINNING COMBINATION OF NUMBERS.
Why Style Is Meaningless & Not Letting Your Yes Be Yes Only:
THE REASON STYLE IS MEANINGLESS IS BECAUSE IT CAN BE COMPLETELY REMOVED WITHOUT LOSS OF MEANING TO WHATEVER IS SAID, NO MATTER WHETHER WHAT IS SAID IS TRUE OR FALSE.
WHATEVER ANYONE CAN SAY MAY BE TRUE OR FALSE, LOGICALLY VIABLE OR UNTENABLE BUT NO MATTER WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, ITS MEANING REMAINS COMPLETELY INTACT IF ITS ACCOMPANYING STYLE IS ELIMINATED.
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT BY STRETCHING THE LENGTH OF ITS SYLLABLES THE MEANING OF THAT WORD IS ENHANCED? SIMILARLY, DO YOU BELIEVE THAT BY CONSTANTLY CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS WITHIN AND BETWEEN SYLLABLES A WORD’S MEANING IS ENHANCED?
IF YOU AGREE THAT STRETCHING ITS SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS DO NOT ENHANCE A WORD’S MEANING THEN STYLE IS MEANINGLESS BUT STYLE IS INDISCRIMINATELY INTENDED TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS.
HOW CAN SOMETHING THAT IS PRESENT ALL THE TIME IN EVERYTHING YOU SAY BE MEANINGFUL? SOMETHING MEANINGFUL CAN ONLY BE PRESENT WHEN THERE IS A REASON FOR IT TO BE PRESENT. HOW CAN THERE BE REASON FOR STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO BE PRESENT ALL THE TIME YOU SPEAK EXCEPT THAT IT IS MEANINGLESS, INTENDED FOR SHOW TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, INTIMIDATE & DOMINATE OTHERS.
THE SIN OF STYLE FAR OUTWEIGHS ANY TRUTH TOLD:
Whatever truth there is in the substance of what is said is far outweighed or dwarfed by the sin and hypocrisy of any attending style. The pained emotional admission that you did it that not only induces emotional stress, restlessness and distraction in you and the other party but conditions you and him evermore to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate far outweighs the truth of your admission.
NO REASON IS REQUIRED, ONLY FORCE IS ALWAYS REQUIRED TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED OR LOUDNESS THAT ARE THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SPOKEN STYLE. IN FACT THE PRESENCE OF REASON OR ATTENTION IS INIMICAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO THE PRODUCTION OF STYLE OR STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE THE PRESENCE OF REASON OR ATTENTION WILL LEAD TO A REALIZATION OR CONCLUSION THAT THEY ARE A SENSELESS WASTE OF ENERGY THAT CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION. THUS STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE SENSELESS PROCESSES THAT ALWAYS REQUIRE THE USE OF MENTAL FORCE THAT ARE ACTUALLY BETTER EXECUTED WITHOUT THE PRESENCE OF ATTENTION OR REASON (WHICH IS WHY STYLISH PEOPLE ARE MOSTLY IF NOT TOTALLY UNAWARE THEY ARE STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) AND THEY DO NOT RESULT IN ANY CHANGES OF MEANING OF WHAT IS SAID AND THEREFORE STYLE CAN BE TOTALLY ELIMINATED WITHOUT ANY LOSS OF MEANING TO WHAT IS BEING SAID. BECAUSE THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS ARE MEANINGLESS OR REASONLESS PROCESSES (ONLY FORCEFUL PROCESSES) THAT PRODUCE NO EFFECT ON MEANING AND THEY CONSUME MANY TIMES MORE ENERGY THAN THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS SAID, THE STYLE COMPONENT OF THE SUBSTANCE AND STYLE COMBO IS ALWAYS THE DOMINANT FACTION. IN ALL SUBSTANCE AND STYE COMBO, THE STYLE COMPONENT IS ALWAYS THE BIG BROTHER THAT CONSUMES MANY TIMES MORE ENERGY TO PRODUCE PRODIGIOUS UNNECESSARY OR MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACION. EVEN IF WHAT IS SAID IS TRUE, THE MEANINGLESS STYLE COMPONENT THAT IS ALWAYS THE BIG BROTHER TO THE PUNY SUBSTANCE RENDERS IT PREPONDERANTLY HYPOCRITICAL RATHER THAN PREPONDERANTLY MEANINGFUL AND INSIGNIFICANTLY HYPOCRITICAL.
IT IS A BIG MISTAKE TO THINK THAT PROVIDED THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT IS BEING SAID IS TRUE, THE PRESENCE OF THE STYLE COMPONENT MATTERS LITTLE OR NOTHING BECAUSE THE PRESENCE OF ANY STYLE THAT IS ALWAYS MEANINGLESS NEGATES WHATEVER TRUTH THERE IS PRESENT IN WHAT IS SAID. THE REASON IS BECAUSE NO MATTER WHETHER THE SUBSTANCE IS TRUE OR FALSE, THE PRESENT STYLE OR FORCEFUL STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS IF IDENTICAL AS IT SHOULD BE, WILL IMPART THE SAME STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION ON THE PERPETRATOR HIMSELF AND HIS LISTENER.
IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE WHETHER WHAT IS SAID IS TRUE OR FALSE BECAUSE THE MEANINGLESS OR HYPOCRITICAL STYLE IN BOTH CASES WILL CONSUME THE SAME ENERGY TO PRODUCE THE SAME STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN THE PERPETRATOR AND HIS HAPLESS VICTIMS AND THEREFORE THE PERSON IS JUST AS MUCH A HYPOCRITE ON THE OCCASIONS WHEN HE SPEAKS WITH STYLE WHAT IS TRUE IN SUBSTANCE AS WHEN HE SPEAKS WITH STYLE WHAT IS FALSE IN SUBSTANCE. IN OTHER WORDS, IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER WHAT THE PERSON SAYS IS TRUE OR FALSE, SO LONG AS HIS MEANINGLESS STYLE IS PRESENT UNALTERED IN BOTH CASES, HE IS JUST AS MUCH A HYPOCRITE WHEN HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH AS WHEN HE SPEAKS WHAT IS FALSE, HE STRESSES HIMSELF AND OTHERS JUST AS MUCH WHEN HE SPEAKS WITH STYLE WHAT IS TRUE AS WHEN HE SPEAKS WITH STYLE WHAT IS FALSE.
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS WHAT STYLE ESSENTIALLY IS ABOUT, ENHANCES THE MEANING OF WHATEVER YOU SAY, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR YOU HAVE FALSE LOGIC AND PERCEPTION TO MISTAKE EMOTIONS ENGENDERED BY STYLE AS MEANINGFUL THAT WILL TURN MAD.
BECAUSE STYLE CAN BE ELIMINATED WITHOUT LOSING ANY MEANING, ANYONE WHO SPEAKS WITH STYLE IS SPEAKING WITH SOMETHING EXTRA THAT IS MEANINGLESS (ONLY FOR SHOW) AND HE THEREFORE CANNOT COMPLETELY MEAN WHAT HE IS SAYING (BECAUSE AN IMPORTANT PART OF WHAT HE IS SAYING, HIS STYLE IS FALSE OR MEANINGLESS) AND HE IS ALWAYS A HYPOCRITE EVEN IF THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HE SAYS IS ON CERTAIN OCCASIONS TRUE. IN OTHER WORDS, AT BEST WHAT A STYLISH PERSON SAYS IS RELATIVELY TRUE, NEVER ABSOLUTELY TRUE.
IN ADDITION TO NO LOSS OF MEANING WITH THE REMOVAL OF STYLE, SPEECH THAT ALWAYS HAS SUBSTANCE AND STYLE CANNOT BE TRULY MEANT BECAUSE IT IS REPRODUCED BY REHASH APPROXIMATELY INTENDED FOR THE OCCASION FROM A MENTAL JUKEBOX RATHER THAN FRESH FULLY INTENDED FOR THE OCCASION.
BECAUSE STYLE IS MEANINGLESS, SPEAKING WITH STYLE CANNOT BE LETTING YOUR YES BE YES ONLY BUT IT IS SPEAKING WITH MORE, SPEAKING WITH YOUR TOTALLY UNNECESSARY MEANINGLESS OR INSANE STYLE THAT COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD.
ANYONE WHO IS CAPABLE OF SPEAKING ANGRILY, EXCITEDLY, EAGERLY, MOCKINGLY, JOKINGLY, DRILY, SARCASTICALLY HAS STYLE BECAUSE SOMETHING SAID IS ONLY ANGRY, EXCITING, JOVIAL, ETC BECAUSE OF THE WAY OR STYLE WITH WHICH IT IS SAID.
Whenever anyone speaks angrily eg “I didn’t do it!!!”, the style is the angry way he speaks which is aimed either consciously or unconsciously to impress or convince the listener of his true or false innocence. The meaning of what he said, that he did not do it does not lose one ounce of meaning if he spoke calmly clearly that he did not do it.
The passionately way with which you express “I love you” does not add one iota of meaning to what you are saying but it only serves to impress the foolish gullible girl and it creates emotional stress for yourself and her.
If you can discern there is force in the way you say things; that added force that is actually always present but may elude your attention at lower levels, is the style that is never constant but constantly changing in speed and strength.
WHATEVER ANYONE WANTS TO SAY CAN BE SHORN OF ITS STYLE AND NO MEANING IS LOST BECAUSE STYLE IS ONLY MEANT TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE.
NOT ONLY IS STYLE MEANINGLESS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ADD MEANING TO WHAT IS SAID, ALL STYLE (EG STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS) CONSUMES ENERGY TO PRODUCE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FOR THE STYLISH PERSON THAT IS ALSO IMPARTED ON ALL LISTENERS.
THEREFORE THE PERSON WHO SPEAKS WITH STYLE CANNOT MEAN THE STYLE THAT ACCOMPANIES WHAT HE SAYS AND MUST BE A HYPOCRITE EVEN IF THE SUBSTANCE OF WHAT HE SAYS ON OCCASIONS IS TRUE OR LOGICALLY VIABLE.
Speaking With Style Is The Essence Of Hypocrisy:
Apart from accompanying facial and hand expressions, speaking with style is little more than the individual’s way of stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness within and between syllables.
The word ‘apple’ conveys meaning in that it denotes a certain fruit to those who can read English. Does stretching its syllables enhance or affect the meaning of the word ‘apple’?
If you agree that stretching its syllables in no way affect the meaning of the word ‘apple’ then you are conveying to others something that is meaningless when you stretch syllables, change speed and loudness when you say ‘apple’ with style.
If you convey something (your style) that is meaningless when you speak, how can you mean everything you say when an important part of what you convey, your style is meaningless and therefore you are pretentious or a hypocrite?
SPEAKING WITH STYLE IS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF HYPOCRISY (NOT MEANING WHAT YOU SAY) OR PRETENTIOUSNESS.
Why do people speak with style? Why do some Malaysian students speak with an American or British or Australian accent which is nothing more than the different nationalistic fashion or style of stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness within and between syllables? The reason is to impress others with their status, to tell others they are more high class or ‘groovy’.
Thus there is no meaning in style and style is intended blindly across board to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others.
Not only is there no meaning in style, style consumes prodigious mental and physical energy compared to the puny substance of what is said to create insoluble cumulative stress, restlessness and distraction for the stylish fool and all who hears, conditions him and all his listeners to style, stress, restlessness and distraction that becomes increasingly entrenched and harder to exit.
THEREFORE IF YOU HAVE STYLE, IF YOU STRETCH YOUR SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE BANE OF ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE (INCLUDING THE POPE) YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE.
A Hypocrite On Four Counts:
The purpose of style is to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others. Therefore a person who speaks with style can never just mean what he says because he also means to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate.
If you mean to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate others with your accompanying style, how can you truly and fully mean what you say? If you cannot fully mean what you say you are then by definition a hypocrite.
When you speak with style you do not just mean what you say because you also mean to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate and you do not say what you mean because you do not say to the listener that you also mean in speaking to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate him.
Because people who speak with style can never truly or fully mean what they say, they must all be assailed by doubt that leads to uncertainty that because it is conditioning, can spread to other areas that becomes increasingly bizarre, from doubt about what they say progressing to doubt about themselves and thence to everything in life that becomes increasingly intense, easy to arouse and hard to shake off.
At best style detracts from the substance of what is said, at worst it overrides the substance of what is said. For instance, if you angrily deny you did something, the angry style you said it detracts from the truth of what you say, if you boast about your car, the truth about your car is secondary to your desire to impress or wow the listener.
When a salesperson speaks in a fabricated friendly way to impress he likes you and is benevolent, it is to deceive you to trust him and make a purchase.
When someone speaks in an aggressive way, his aim is to intimidate or dominate you with the way he speaks that is more important than the substance of whatever he is saying.
People often say things that they know from experience you like to hear not because they truly want to say them but to please you and therefore if your intention to say them is to please another person, how can you truly mean what you say?
A person who speaks with style is a hypocrite on four counts:
a) His individually consistent style cannot be produced live specifically composed from scratch or anew for the situation at hand but must be committed to very reliable memory to be rehashed standardized from a mental jukebox. Anyone who is always rehashing to meet the demands of the situation rather than personally composing live for a given situation is a hypocrite. It is impossible by chance to end up with the same style that differs from others but instead you always render the same style by committing it to even subconscious memory and rehashing it by rote.
b) He cannot mean his style that he is conveying because style is meaningless and this makes him a hypocrite because he cannot mean what is meaningless, his style. He is constantly rendering stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness that is meaningless, does not add meaning to what he wants to say and therefore he cannot mean his style that he is transmitting that is only for show and therefore he is a hypocrite.
c) He means to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate with his accompanying style that is apart from and often contradicts the meaning of what he is saying and therefore he does not mean what he is saying but he means to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate you making him a hypocrite.
d) Meaning to stress others. Without style, without constantly forcefully stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot stress others, distract and make them restless.
Therefore whether intended or not, when you speak with style you mean to stress, distract and make restless others and this is ill will, meaning or intending more than the substance of what you say that comes from evil not good.
A person who intends or means to stress others is a hypocrite because his fine words belie his intention to stress.
THUS WHENEVER A PERSON SPEAKS WITH STYLE AN IMPORTANT IF NOT OVERRIDING PURPOSE IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS AND IF THESE ARE IMPORTANT EVEN OVERRIDING PURPOSE THAT YOU NEVER STATE TO THE LISTENER, HOW CAN YOU TRULY OR FULLY HAVE SAID WHAT YOU MEAN? IF YOU DID NOT FULLY SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, SAY YOU MEAN TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE, AREN’T YOU A HYPOCRITE?
BY CONTRAST A PERSON WHO SPEAKS WITHOUT STYLE CAN NEVER MEAN TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE OTHERS BECAUSE THERE IS NO STYLE PRESENT THAT DOES SO AND HE CAN AND HE ALWAYS MEANS WHAT HE SAYS, SAYS WHAT HE MEANS OR HAS IN MIND. BECAUSE THERE IS NO ACCOMPANYING STYLE THAT IS MEANINGLESS HE NEVER CONVEYS SOMETHING (STYLE) THAT IS MEANINGLESS ONLY FOR SHOW). BECAUSE HE HAS NO STYLE THAT NEEDS MEMORIZING, HE CAN SPEAK LIVE COMPOSING SPEECH THAT IS SPECIFICALLY INTENDED FOR EACH SITUATION.
JESUS SAID LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY ANYTHING MORE COMES FROM EVIL. IF YOU LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY, YOU ONLY MEAN WHAT YOU SAY AND NOTHING MORE. ANYTHING MORE, THE STYLE THAT IS MEANT TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE COMES FROM EVIL NOT GOOD. THUS ANYONE WHO SPEAKS WITH STYLE IS NOT LETTING HIS YES BE YES ONLY AS JESUS COMMANDS YOU.
IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE STYLE IS EVIL, STYLE OR CONSTANT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS CREATES STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT IS NOT ONLY SUFFERING BUT INCREASINGLY CONDITION YOU TO THEM THAT WILL END IN LOSS OF CONTROL AND MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
It is impossible by chance to end up with your same style (and even same things you speak) that differs from others every time you speak and therefore what you say and how you say that differs from others but is consistent to you must be produced by rote or regurgitation and you are a robot. Anyone who speaks like a tape recorder is a hypocrite.
IF WHAT I SAY HAS CONVINCED YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT WHERE PREVIOUSLY YOU WERE NOT, WOULDN’T THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED LOOK SILLY IF HE WERE TO NOW SPEAK TO YOU TO TEACH YOU ALL THINGS AND CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT THAT YOU ARE ALREADY CONVINCED BECAUSE YOU CAN SEE IT IS SO?
A DEFINITION OF STYLE:
All beings including animals not only have style but it is constant. If you think you have no style, ask me and I will demonstrate how you too have style.
STYLE IS A PERSON’S DISTINCTIVE WAY OF SPEAKING, DOING THINGS, THINKING AND PERCEIVING (SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING, TOUCHING) WHOSE UNFAILING CONSISTENCY MANDATES THAT HE MUST EXIST AS A ROBOT BECAUSE HIS CONSISTENT STYLE CANNOT BE PRODUCED LIVE FROM SCRATCH FOR EACH OCCASION BUT IT MUST BE MEMORIZED AND REHASHED BY ROTE; IT (STYLE) IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY & MEANINGLESS EXCEPT TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE OTHERS AND IT IS ESSENTIALLY USING MENTAL FORCE TO STRETCH AND CONSTANTLY CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE PROCESS CREATING RISING INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION FOR THAT PERSON THAT IS ALSO IMPARTED ON OTHERS THAT IS NOT ONLY ALWAYS TORMENTING BUT CONDITIONS HIM EVERMORE TO STYLE, STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT HE CANNOT BELIEVE WILL END IN INSANITY. APART FROM BEING INTRINSICALLY MEANINGLESS, ONLY MEANT FOR SHOW, STYLE RENDERS THE PERSON A HYPOCRITE BECAUSE HE IS RENDERING TO OTHERS SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, HE MEANS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE THAT IS APART FROM WHAT HE IS SAYING AND HE IS AN IMPERSONAL ROBOT SPEAKING BY REHASH SIMILAR IF NOT IDENTICAL TO OCCASIONS IN THE PAST, NOT SPECIFICALLY FOR THE OCCASION.
A Plague Of The Worst Kind:
Science says mankind left Africa barely 50,000 years ago and was nearly wiped out by the super volcano eruption at Lake Toba in Sumatra 10,000 years ago. In just 10,000 years from the time it was nearly wiped out, mankind will deplete the ocean of its fish in another 40 years and generally brought the earth to its knees. Thus the earth cannot afford to host humans except for very brief periods when the Age is coming to a close and if you cannot go to heaven to eternal life, you must wander as Jesus said in eternal habitations as animals to satisfy your likes and dislikes that you will not give up.
Next Time I Won’t Bring You Food:
When I reminded this person that the reason she brings me things to eat is not without selfish purpose, why doesn’t she take food to beggars, she retorted with a huff: Next time I won’t bring you food.
She did not mean the substance of what she said because she subsequently brought food for me that does not negates meritoriously what she previously said, but made her a liar that is not without consequence in punishment apart from conditioning herself to doubt and uncertainty because anyone who does not mean what she says must harbor doubt that leads to uncertainty.
She did not mean the substance of what she said because what she meant was not next time I won’t bring you food but what she mean was I will punish you for saying what you said by withholding food from you. If you think that the next time I won’t bring you food and I will punish you or retaliate for what you said is the same, you may have true logic and perception or you have false logic and perception that will end in mad perception and logic that food is shit and shit is food.
IT IS NOT MERITORIOUS TO CONVENIENTLY FORGOT WHAT YOU SAID AND BRING FOOD TO ME LATER BECAUSE YOU HAVE CONVERTED YOURSELF INTO A LIAR BUT YOU FIRST SAY YOU DID NOT MEAN WHAT YOU SAID EARLIER AND ASK FOR FORGIVENESS THAT WHEN GIVEN IT IS THEN MERITORIOUS TO RESUME BRINGING FOOD.
JUST AS SHE IS UNAWARE SHE IS NOT MEANING WHAT SHE SAID WHEN SHE SPOKE AND ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE LIKELY TO SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH WHAT SHE SAID, IN THE SAME WAY, PEOPLE FAR UNDERESTIMATE THE EXTENT TO WHICH THEY NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY, NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN.

Quoting Jesus and the Buddha:
You have heard the pope quote an emperor. How often have you heard him or past popes quote what Jesus said, let alone explain correctly what Jesus meant.
How often have you heard the Dalai Lama or leaders representing the Buddha preach from the teachings and discipline of the Buddha?
The Buddha: Bhikkhus, the arising of three things are rare in the world. What three?

The arising of the Thus Gone One, worthy and rightfully enlightened is rare the world.

A person who preaches the Teaching and Discipline declared by the Thus Gone One is rare in the world.

A person who has gratitude and returns it, is rare in the world. Bhikkhus, the arising of these three things are rare in the world.
By just quoting what the Buddha said above that no other preachers have done to you, I have not just preached the teaching declared by the Buddha that is true (and therefore I am a truly rare person according to the Buddha) but I have in many instances demonstrated the veracity or objective truth of what the Buddha taught as no man has done.
For instance I have demonstrated that abandoning stress, restlessness and neither liking nor disliking are not wishy-washy, make believe attainments but you abandon stress and restlessness by never forcefully stretching syllables or units of motion and paying attention to not constantly change speed and loudness (strength of force), you neither like not dislike if your mental force of going against self neither rises and falls in undulating or unabated speed and strength.
THUS THE BUDDHA IS CORRECT WHEN HE SAID A PERSON WHO PREACHES THE TEACHING AND DISCIPLINE DECLARED BY HIM IS RARE (JUST AS A PERSON WHO TRULY TAKES FROM WHAT IS JESUS AND MAKES IT KNOWN TO YOU IS RARE OR ALMOST NONEXISTENT) AND BY THE BUDDHA’S WORDS, I AM A TRULY RARE PERSON IN THIS WORLD.
BECAUSE THE GRATITUDE OF PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD ARE TAINTED BY EMOTION, TAINTED BY FALSE STYLE, THEIR GRATITUDE LIKE ALL THEIR ACTIVITIES ARE REHASHED STADARDIZED BY ROTE FROM MEMORY FOR THE OCCASION, THEY CANNOT BE TRULY GENUINE AND THEREFORE THE BUDDHA IS AGAIN CORRECT TO SAY THAT A PERSON WHO HAS GRATITUDE AND RETURNS IT IS RARE. SOME MAY HAVE GRATITUDE BUT THEY DO NOT RETURN IT, THEIR EMOTIONS, SPECIFICALLY PRIDE AND PRETENTIOUSNESS IS AN OBSTACLE FOR THEM TO RETURN IT.
IF WHAT I SAY THAT IS UNPRECEDENTED CONVINCES YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT WOULD IT NOT LOOK FOOLISH OR MEANINGLESS IF THE COUNSELOR WERE TO NOW TRY TO TEACH YOU ALL THINGS AND CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS & JUDGMENT THAT YOU ARE ALREADY CONVINCED? I DO NOT LOOK FOOLISH TRYING TO CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT BECAUSE NO ONE IN THE PAST AND TODAY HAS SAID THE THINGS I SAID. IF WHAT I SAY THAT IS COMPREHENSIVE AND UNPRECEDENTED DOES NOT CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT, IT MAY BE THAT THERE ARE STILL OTHER INCONCEIVABLE THINGS THAT THE COUNSELOR WILL SAY IN RELATION TO WHAT JESUS SAID IN THE NEW TESTAMENT THAT WILL CONVINCE YOU OF SIN, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND JUDGMENT (JESUS SAID REGARDING SIN BECAUSE MEN DO NOT BELIEVE ME) OR IT MAY BE THAT YOU ARE AN INCORRIGIBLE GOAT, TOO STEEPED IN DELUSION TO BE CONVINCED WITH REASON BY ANYONE.
Uncertainty:
Uncertainty is a forceful or emotional conflicted state of the mind that has nothing to do with reality or reason, that is not an unavoidable state of the mind that comes with existence but uncertainty is a state of their minds that ordinary people are unaware they are regularly conditioning themselves to each time they stir and experience uncertainty. Uncertainty has strength and ease of arousal that can be conditioned with regular experience so that it becomes increasingly easier to arouse to more intense levels that become harder to shed and they are headed for mad unappeasable uncertainty.
Speaking Of Fear:
Quote: The figures, published on the eve of the traditional Thanksgiving holiday, added to fears of a downturn.
Comment: It is totally unnecessary to talk of fear in the situation above and whether it is facile or genuinely felt, by speaking of fear you are conditioning yourself to fear, exciting readers to greater or lesser extent that you do not realize will culminate in mad, intense fear.
The wise person says, “Added to likelihood of a downturn”. If you are attached to this world, neither like nor dislike a downturn, what is there to fear but instead in this case, the use of ‘fear’ is to partially unwittingly express a dislike for a downturn.
Nothing Cool Or Uncool:
Quote: This week a consortium financed by Icelandic billionaire Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson bought West Ham football club for a cool £85m.
Comment: There is nothing cool or related to temperature regarding to £85m but it is emotionally used to express ‘wow’. You have false logic and perception to think or perceive that there is anything cool or to do with temperature regarding £85m.
See nothing wrong or understand what it is trying to convey and you may be cultivating false logic and perception that will end in agony.