A season to spread cheer
SENIOR citizens Chew Gaik Sim, 81, Nordin Cik Teh, 77, and M. P. Kaliammah, 65, were beaming with joy after receiving food aid worth RM50 and RM10 duit raya each in conjunction with Hari Raya and National Day.
This is a thoroughly deluded statement in many ways and if you do not know what to make of it, you think it is good then you do not understand or understand falsely.
Just because there are festivities around does not make it a season which by definition is a division of the year, marked by changes in weather, ecology, and hours of daylight.
You don’t ask others to spread cheer, which is demeritorious not meritorious because you want others to be a robot to do as you tell them. In any case cheer is not good but it is doing or saying things that HARMFULLY stir mental force in each other to like or be excited.
JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE FESTIVITIES PRESENT DOES NOT MAKE IT A SEASON.
YOU DON’T TELL OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TELL THEM TO SPREAD CHEER WHICH IF THEY LISTENED TO YOU, THEY BECOME YOUR ROBOTS.
CHEER IS NOT GOOD BUT IT IS ACTUALLY FABRICATED TO BE PLEASE AND IMPRESS EACH OTHER, TO STIR ONE’S OWN AND OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE EXCITED BY PROCEEDINGS THAT IS EVIL NOT GOOD.
IF YOU MUST HAVE CHEER, HEAVEN MAY NOT BE THE PLACE FOR YOU BUT EVEN ETERNAL WOE IS THE PLACE FOR YOU.
THUS IF I AM CORRECT THEN ANYONE WHO DOES NOT VIEW THUS HAVE WRONG VIEW, DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.
IT IS WRONG, BAD NEVER GOOD TO TELL OTHERS THIS IS A SEASON TO SPREAD CHEER. UNLESS WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS TO DO IS TRULY GOOD, YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TO SPREAD CHEER.
Fate cannot be denied:
These two persons were swept away but survived from the same beach during the tsunami in which seven died. Today they were swept away to perish and it is said the boy behaved unusually in the run up suggesting that he had a premonition of impending death:
Quote: The two were swept away at the same place where seven people lost their lives during the Dec 26 tsunami in 2004. “The water was just knee-deep. But all of a sudden, the four of us were washed over by strong waves. My son was swept out to the sea and my younger brother went after him. He said his son's behaviour had been very different over the past few days, adding that the boy had been kissing him on the cheek and hugging him.
“I don't know why. Maybe he knew his time was up,” he said.
False associations to stir emotion:
The streets may be empty during the Hari Raya period but the scene at many restaurants tells a different story.
What is relevant is that restaurants are doing good business, that the streets are empty is a false fabricated association designed to stir emotional poignancy or conflict or contradiction that streets are empty but restaurants are full.
BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE ASSOCIATION, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF STIRRING OTHERS’ EMOTIONS. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING EMPTY STREETS IN TALKING ABOUT FULL RESTAURANTS, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE ASSOCIATION WITH INSANITY THE FINAL OUTCOME FOR YOU.
A programmed style of speech:
To speak that the streets may be empty but many restaurants tell a different story is a programmed format of speaking copied from others.
THERE IS A COMMON STYLE OF SPEAKING THAT IS AIMED AT STIRRING EMOTIONAL CONTRADICTION OR CONTRAST OR ‘WOW’ THAT GOES LIKE THIS: WHEREAS ‘A’ IS ‘X’ ‘B’ IS THE OPPOSITE. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONTRAST, IF YOU WANT YOU CAN FIND CONTRASTS OR OPPOSITES EVERYWHERE, THEY ARE NOT RELATED TO EACH OTHER AND YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO FALSELY PERCEIVE IRONY OR CONTRAST EVERYWHERE TO STIR ‘WOW’ IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
THE PURPOSE IS TO STIR ‘WOW’, THE STREETS MAY BE EMPTY BUT ‘WOW’ THE RESTAURANTS ARE A DIFFERENT STORY, ‘HO, HO, HO’.
Not just Anwar’s DNA but his sperm DNA needed:
In order to obtain a conviction of Anwar based solely on forensic evidence (no video or audio evidence), the prosecution must establish that Anwar’s sperm not just his DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
After three days before Saiful presented himself for examination and another two to three days when the samples were (incompetently) left at room temperature, you would expect DNA degradation according to expert testimony but ‘miraculously’ the DNA was pristine suggesting it was not genuine.
THUS THE FACT THAT THE DNA SAMPLES WERE PRISTINE NOT DEGRADED SUGGESTS THEY WERE NOT GENUINE BECAUSE IN KEEPING WITH CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE SAMPLES WERE SAID TO HAVE BEEN OBTAINED YOU WOULD EXPECT DEGRADATION.
IN CRIMINAL RAPE OR HOMICIDE CASES, DEGRADED DNA (EG HAIR AND BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS THAT MATCHES THE SUSPECT CAN BE USED TO CONVICT THE PERSON BUT IN THIS CASE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER ANWAR SODOMIZED SAIFUL OR NOT, IF HE DID, THEN ANWAR’S SPERM SHOULD BE FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM AND YOU MUST PROVE THE ANWAR DNA FOUND CAME FROM HIS SPERM CELLS WHICH WOULD BE EXPECTED TO HAVE DEGRADED BECAUSE OF THE DELAYED PRESENTATION AND MISHANDLING OF THE SPECIMENS.
THUS FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, HERE IS AGAIN EVIDENCE OF THE FABRICATED NATURE OF THE CASE.
Where did they get Anwar’s fresh sperm?
Anwar’s fresh sperm could have been obtained whilst he was in a lock-up from his underwear during his arrest or they could have paid a maid to steal Anwar’s underwear repetitively until they got one with Anwar’s fresh sperm.
The central issue in the Anwar Saiful case:
In order to convict Anwar fairly of sodomizing Saiful based solely on forensic evidence, the prosecution must prove sperm containing Anwar’s DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
The complication or specificity of this case is that Saiful presented three days late for examination and it was admitted specimens obtained was left in a cabinet at room temperature for a few days and in such circumstances it would be expected the sperm specimen from Anwar would show degradation rather than the pristine sample that was presented to court.
BECAUSE SAIFUL PRESENTED LATE AND THE SPECIMEN WAS INCOMPETENTLY HANDLED, IN ORDER FOR THE SPECIMEN TO BE GENUINE IT MUST SHOW DEGRADATION THAT IT APPARENTLY DID NOT SHOW.
Prosecution’s extraordinary faith in Saiful & his rectum:
Why has the system or ruling elite demonstrated such extraordinary unwavering faith in Saiful’s story and absolute certainty his rectum contained Anwar’s sperm?
If Saiful’s allegations of sodomy are fraudulent, designed to destroy Anwar politically then it is understandable why the authorities have stuck to Saiful and supported him at great lengths through thick and thin to get his case heard and completed to a final verdict.
If the case is genuine, Saiful was indeed sodomized by Anwar and seeking justice, the authorities are completely neutral, disinterested, it is impossible that they should know with CERTAINTY Saiful is telling the truth, not making up something that may not have occurred.
IT IS EXTRAORDINARY EVEN INCREDIBLE THAT IF SAIFUL’S ALLEGATIONS ARE TRUE THAT THE PROSECUTION WHO CANNOT KNOW IT TRULY HAPPENED, HAS SUCH UNWAVERING FAITH IN SAIFUL’S STORY.
It looks likely if not certainly that conviction will based solely on forensic evidence, specifically the establishment that Anwar’s DNA was extracted from Saiful’s rectum.
If the case is fraudulent and the prosecutors can implant illegally obtained DNA from Anwar when he was arrested (eg his buccal cell DNA from his toothbrush), then they can be absolutely certain of obtaining a conviction.
If this case is genuine, how can the authorities be so confident or certain that the DNA extracted from Saiful’s rectum can be traced to Anwar? The authorities even tried to pass a law making it mandatory for Anwar to give DNA so either they do not know Anwar’s DNA profile or it is a sham to get DNA to be implanted.
WITHOUT KNOWING ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE (BECAUSE THEY WANTED ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR MATCHING), HOW CAN THEY BE SO CERTAIN THAT THE DNA THEY GOT FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, ESPECIALLY WHEN IF IT IS GENUINE, NOT A PLOT THEY CANNOT KNOW IF SAIFUL IS NOT MAKING UP THE SODOMY ALLEGATION? NOT BEING CERTAIN, HOW COULD THEY HAVE COME TO THIS ADVANCED STATE OF PROSECUTION BASED ON SAIFUL’S ALLEGATION AND SUSPICION THE DNA THEY FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM IS ANWAR’S?
IF ON THE OTHER HAND THIS IS A PLOT TO DESTROY ANWAR, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF SAIFUL’S SODOMY DID NOT OCCUR, IT WAS INTENDED TO BE FAKED, THE DNA FOUND OR IMPLANTED INTO SAIFUL’S RECTUM WILL BELONG TO ANWAR, BY HOOK OR BY CROOK.
IT IS INCREDIBLE OR IMPOSSIBLE THAT IF THE CASE IS GENUINE THE AUTHORITIES COULD PURSUE THE CASE SO CONFIDENTLY WHEN THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN THE DNA IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR REFERENCE SO HOW CAN THEY KNOW THE DNA IN SAIFUL IS ANWAR’S. WITHOUT KNOWING WITH CERTAINTY THE DNA IS ANWAR’S THEY ARE TAKING GREAT RISKS TO BRING THE CASE TO COURT SOLELY BASED ON FORENSIC CONVICTION.
The difference between Sodomy I & II:
Anwar was jailed for six years not for sodomy but abuse of power I think, the Azizan sodomy trial was a sideshow that smeared Anwar, it was based on the uncorroborated evidence of Azizan, Anwar’s wife’s driver and no DNA was involved and so it is likely prosecutors did not have DNA samples for reference leftover from the first sodomy trial which is why they even enacted new legislation to force Anwar to give samples for DNA.
THUS IT CAN BE ASSUMED QUITE SAFELY THE AUTHORITIES DID NOT HAVE SAMPLES OF ANWAR’S DNA FOR MATCHING APART FROM THAT OBTAINED FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH OR PERSONAL EFFECTS IN THE RECENT CASE THAT THEY KNOW WITH CERTAINTY CAME FROM ANWAR THAT COULD BE PLANTED. AND SO WITHOUT ANWAR DNA AS REFERENCE, HOW COULD THEY BE SO SURE TO PROSECUTE THE CASE BASED ON DNA THEY OBTAINED FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM THAT THEY CANNOT KNOW FOR SURE CAME FROM ANWAR?
IT IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF SHOWING ANWAR’S DNA WAS PRESENT IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BUT IT MUST BE DNA FROM ANWAR’S SPERM, NOT BUCCAL MUCOSA (ANWAR COULD NOT HAVE PERFORMED ORAL SEX ON SAIFUL’S INNER SANCTUM OR RECTUM). IT APPEARS THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO TELL IF THE DNA CAME FROM SPERM OR OTHER SOURCES AND IT WAS NOT SHOWN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR’S SPERM.
FURTHER IN THEIR HASTE TO IRREFUTABLY INCRIMINATE ANWAR, THE PROSECUTION PRESENTED PRISTINE DNA AS EVIDENCE WHEN ACCORDING TO EXPERT TESTIMONY, THE DNA IS EXPECTED TO SHOW DEGRADATION BASED ON THE HISTORY OF LATE PRESENTATION AND BEING LEFT IN A DRAWER.
THUS THE FOOL THINKS PRISTINE DNA WOULD PROVE THEIR CASE INCONTROVERTIBLY BECAUSE IT BELONGED TO ANWAR BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE LET THE DNA DENATURE IN KEEPING WITH SAIFUL’S DELAY PRESENTATION.
IT CAN BE REASONED WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, NOT PROBABILITY THAT THE SODOMY CASE AGAINST ANWAR IS FRADULENT BASED ON INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND IT REFLECTS PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY THINK IT CANNOT BE KNOWN, ANWAR MAY BE GUILTY OR THEY EMOTIONALLY CONCLUDE IT IS A CONSPIRACY WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS A CONSPIRACY.
IF THIS CASE IS GENUINE THEN THE PROSECUTION HAS SHOWN EXTRAORDINARY UNWAVERING FAITH THAT WHAT SAIFUL TOLD THEM THAT THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN IS TRUE, IS TRUE AND THE DNA FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE NO REFERENCE DNA WITH WHICH TO MATCH.
IF THIS CASE IS A FRAUD AIMED AT DESTROYING ANWAR THEN IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD BE SO DOGGED OR UNWAVERING IN THEIR PROSECTION OF ANWAR.
THERE ARE NEVER PERFECT CRIMES, THERE ARE TELLING SIGNS THAT TELL THE DISCERNING WHAT IS THE TRUTH.
Anwar still hasn’t given DNA sample:
Anwar still hasn’t given his DNA as sample so how did the authorities know so confidently the DNA they allegedly extracted from Saiful’s rectum came from Anwar? If you say they got secret reference based on his toothbrush, then that is chicanery and it is dangerous to assume the DNA from the toothbrush must be Anwar’s.
ONLY WHEN A CERTIFIED SCRUPULOUSLY OBTAINED SPECIMEN DNA IS OBTAINED FROM ANWAR CAN YOU FAIRLY CONVICT ANWAR OF SODOMY. IT IS DANGEROUS AND PRESUMPTUOUS TO CONVICT ANWAR BASED ON DNA THAT WAS TAKEN WITHOUT CONSENT FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH.
IF YOU TOOK A SPECIMEN IN FRONT OF WITNESSES THEN YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR, IF YOU STOLE IT FROM ANWAR’S TOOTHBRUSH HOW CAN YOU BE CERTAIN IT IS NOT SPURIOUS AND YOU CANNOT USE IT AS A REFERENCE TO CONVICT ANWAR.
Adelaide abominable, holds no allure for me:
I spent more than a decade in Adelaide and now it is possible to listen to Adelaide radio stations via the internet. There are changes and there are things that never changed.
Listening to 5DN station now called Cruise Adelaide, I am reminded (without sentiment) the many years I spent in Adelaide and it was not fun but suffering even to terrible levels.
Listening to the advertisements and the ways disc jockeys speak reminds me how impersonal faked as personal, supercilious for show life is in Adelaide and like the man who has vomited out his food will not eat it again, there is no way Adelaide will hold any allure to me, nor do I prefer KL.
THIS IS A THOROUGHLY SICK WORLD AND RATHER THAN WONDERFUL LIFE IS IN THE WEST AND AUSTRALIA, IT IS ROTTEN, SICKENING, HEARTLESS, COLD AND CUT THROAT AND SO ANYONE TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS ALLURES BE IT AUSTRALIA, UK, SINGAPORE OR WHAT NOT, WILL SUFFER HERE AND HEAD FOR TERRIBLE EXTENDED EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING. ONLY SOMEONE WHO HAS ABANDONED THIS WORLD, TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS NO ALLURE, IS SICK OF THIS WORLD IS HEADED FOR HEAVEN.
US debt turns nightmare suddenly:
Suddenly the US’ debt levels turned nightmarish for various reasons.
The US spent or printed billions even a trillion to bailout the banks after the Lehman collapse and this overnight boosted like a rocket the US debt.
Together with debt comes interest payments that add to the debt plus a recession means falling GDP means less ability to repay the debt that remains the same or rising.
Through hubris, America launched itself into two very expensive wars that it could not afford and are totally unnecessary in Iraq and Afghanistan and for this George Bush has big karma.
A lot (>50%) of US expenses cannot be cut, a big part that can be cut is security or defence but there is great delusion and opposition to big cuts here and so the US is faced with difficult choices in trying to make ends meet that increasingly cannot meet.
Migrate to heaven not Australia:
The person who seeks happiness and security by migrating to Australia or whatever is always deluded and headed for woe even after he dies, not heaven.
The person who has given up his life here, has no interests in migrating anywhere, instead devotes his time to migrating to heaven is the wise man who is happy or content here and will be blissfully eternally happy after he passes away.
The first fundamental step out of suffering:
The smiling beaming faces, the clean cut smartly dressed looks are deceptions, always for show masks that hide serious deadly suffering that will end in some form of insanity, disease or suffering that leads to another eternity of perdition.
ALL BEINGS HERE WHO DISPLAY STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (AND THIS MEANS EVERYONE HERE) ARE ROBOTS (NOT REAL LIVE TRUE BEINGS) GRIPPED BY SERIOUS DEADLY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT THEY ARE MERELY CONTROLLING AND WILL END IN INSANITY.
WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO SUCCESSFULLY ELIMINATE ALL FOR SHOW USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THE BEING CANNOT ACHIEVE ANY MEANINGFUL PERMANENT ESCAPE FROM WOE.
WITH THE SUCCESSFUL ELIMINATION OF THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, HE HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND, ESCAPED THE PRISON OF BEING A ROBOT, EFFORTLESSLY FREED HIMSELF FROM THE SCOURGE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND IS HEADED FOR ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
THE NEXT FUNDAMENTAL HIGHER STEP OUT OF SUFFERING IS TO ATTAIN THE CESSATION OF THINKING TO EXPERIENCE A UNIFIED MIND FREED FROM THE DISTRACTION OF THINKING AND IT IS A HIGHER HAPPINESS AND GIVES 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THE THIRD STEP IS TO ATTAIN NEITHER STIRRING OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING HAPPENING IN THIS WORLD.
Smartly dressed is purely for show:
Different people have different perceptions of what smartly dressed means and unless you are blind or totally undiscerning you cannot see yourself and others being smartly dressed.
People dress in ways they think is smart or impressive. Because they think it is smart, they think also that others will think it is smart and be similarly impressed.
PEOPLE DRESS EXPENSIVELY WITH A LARGE WARDROBE OR COLLECTION OF ‘ATTRACTIVE’ DRESSES (WITH ACCESSORIES LIKE WATCHES, RINGS, CUFFS, TIES, SHOES, PERFUMES AND WHATNOTS) BECAUSE THEY ARE IMPRESSED BY THE WAYS THEY DRESS AND THEY THINK OTHERS WILL BE SIMILARLY IMPRESSED.
THUS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SMART DRESSING IS FOR SHOW, TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW STYLISH OR TRENDY OR RICH OR RESPECTABLE THEY ARE.
BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A TRUE REASON FOR DRESSING, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ALL THOSE WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH BEING SMARTLY DRESSED, TO WHOM SMART DRESSING IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS ARE HIGHLY VALUED AND PAID ATTENTION TO ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY BECAUSE BEING SMARTLY DRESSED AND WORSHIPPING IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY.
THE TRUE PURPOSE FOR DRESS IS TO PROTECT YOU FROM THE ELEMENTS AND KEEP YOUR MODESTY.
Making statements with your clothes:
There are people who want to make statements with their dressing, want to project meaning with what and how they dress and this too is controlled insanity.
Thus Steve Jobs has his trademark turtle neck sweater and jeans that he is attached to, identifies with and finds meaningful when it is mad and he is deluded because the true purpose of dress is to protect you not to project your values and personality.
A crisis of confidence?
Quote: "What we are effectively going through is a crisis of confidence," said Tom Porcelli, an economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
This is a dumb thing to say and here you have someone touted as expert saying something stupid.
This is not a crisis of confidence but it is difficult economic conditions resulting in serious decline in confidence. If we are going through a crisis of confidence then by restoring confidence, by making everyone confident, the economy is restored. What about the severe personal and national debt burdens, are they the results of the crisis of confidence or is it the other way, severe personal and national debt burdens depressing demand and therefore hurting confidence.
THIS IS NOT A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE, IT IS FAR WORSE THAN THAT, LOW CONFIDENCE MAY BE A SYMPTOM OF THE ECONOMIC CANCER RATHER THAN THE CAUSE. WHAT KIND OF EXPERT IS THIS?
The absolute irrefutable top priority for all beings:
There is only one absolute top priority for all beings to achieve that cannot be disputed or refuted by anyone.
What is this absolute top priority that cannot be refuted?
The identification and elimination without remainder of style, of all use of force to prolong (eg syllables), change speed and strength of force (loudness).
The purpose for existence of all beings even if they are deluded and wicked is to be happy and avoid all forms of suffering, to prolong their lives as long as possible and if eternal life is possible, nobody wants to perish but they want to live forever.
Without first abolishing style, abolishing all stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot attain the first higher state of mind that comes with it one eternity or Age in heavenly bliss. Without first achieving the first higher state of mind you cannot progress to achieve the second higher state (cessation of thinking), the third higher state (neither stirring mental force to like or dislike anything) and thence the fourth highest state of mind (neither pain nor pleasure) that give respectively 2, 4, 500 eternities in heavenly bliss.
THUS THE ABOLITION OF STYLE IS THE KEY TO 1 ETERNITY IN HEAVEN, KEY TO THE SECOND HIGHER STATE (CESSATION OF THINKING) AND 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN, THE THIRD HIGHER STATE (NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE) AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE.
WHATEVER THE HAPPINESS OF A BEING WHO PRACTICES STYLE, IT CANNOT MATCH THE HAPPINESS OF ONE WHO HAS SHED STYLE, WHO NO LONGER USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE HE NO LONGER REHASHES, IS NO LONGER A ROBOT, HE IS EFFORTLESSLY FREED FROM THE TORMENT OF RELENTLESS RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
EVEN IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER DEATH, NO HEAVEN AND HELL, EVEN IF STYLE IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL, NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INCOMPARABLY HAPPIER AND SANER MODE OF EXISTENCE AND THE PERSON AVOIDS CERTAIN INSANITY FROM SENILE DEGRADATION OF THE MIND THAT IS THE LOT OF THOSE WHO PRACTICE STYLE.
IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN I HAVE DISCOVERED AND TAUGHT THE HIGHEST ELIXIR OR KEY TO HAPPINESS, ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING AND EVEN ETERNAL HEAVENLY LIFE.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF ELIMINATING STYLE OR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IT MAY BE ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT IF HAPPINESS, AVOIDING SUFFERING AND ETERNAL LIFE IS IMPORTANT TO YOU.
If happiness, not suffering and eternal life is important to you:
If you seek happiness, want to avoid any suffering and want eternal life if possible then you have only one choice, one recourse and that is to pay attention to identify and eliminate all style, all use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness because it is the key to freedom from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, freedom from being a rehashing robot and is the key to one eternity in heaven, key to the higher states of mind that gives even more than one eternity in heaven.
Anyone who is enjoying himself, happy, experiencing no suffering does not want to die, end his present happiness and so it is that he wishes his blissful state to continue forever, in eternity.
It is only someone who is suffering unbearably who wants to die, hang himself or put a bullet in his own head. Thus someone freed of style is happy, content in himself and not suffering and he does not wish to die and wants eternal life if it is possible and it is possible, even for up to 60,000 Ages or eternities according to the Buddha.
The new Bill Gates: Google's Larry Page
People are presented with this statement and they do not really understand what it means.
What it means is that people’s understanding are false and rehashed.
Bill Gates is Bill Gates and Larry Page is Larry Page, there is no need to depict Larry Page as Bill Gates nor is that ever true.
People have recorded understandings of everything they come into contact with and they consciously or unconsciously try to see what is happening currently in terms of those recorded understanding which is wrong and dangerous.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND LARRY PAGE AS HE ACTUALLY IS INSTEAD OF IMAGINING HIM AS THE BILL GATES OF THE PAST, THERE IS NO NEED TO DO WORK TO RECALL BILL GATES NOR IT IS TRUE TO PICTURE LARRY PAGE AS BILL GATES. NOT ONLY DOES IT SERVE NO PURPOSE, IT IS DANGEROUS TO PROGRAM YOURSELF TO SEE LARRY PAGE AS THE NEW BILL GATES.
Skeptical by both nature and training
"Scientists, skeptical by both nature and training, always urge a dose of caution when looking at any one event as evidence of climate change," he said in his opening statement.
People see nothing wrong with the statement that scientists are sceptical by nature and training when it is unwitting admission scientists are robots without true understanding.
Anyone with genuine understanding is NEVER sceptical nor gullible, readily embracing everything ‘thrown at them’.
Scepticism by training means it is programmed in them and so if scepticism is trained in scientists it is a programmed attitude and scientists are robots with fixed attitudes without true understanding.
SCEPTICISM IS NEVER ABOUT MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT FORCE, A FLAT INDISCRIMINATE RECEPTION OF WHATEVER IS PRESENTED WITH SUSPICION OR REJECTION THAT MUST BE OVERCOME. WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL IF HE HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN SEE AS IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT IS PRESENTED TO HIM IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE? THUS IF SCIENTISTS ARE BY NATURE SCEPTICAL IT MEANS THEY ARE BLIND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING ROBOTS, THEY ARE REJECTING PEOPLE.
PEOPLE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND NEVER NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL NOR BLINDLY GULLIBLY ACCEPTING ANYTHING, SCEPTICISM IS A PROGRAMMING, A PROGRAMMED ATTITUDE OF REJECTION AND SO IT IS AN ADMISSION SCIENTISTS HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, ARE BLIND WITH A PROGRAMMED SCEPTICISM.
SENIOR citizens Chew Gaik Sim, 81, Nordin Cik Teh, 77, and M. P. Kaliammah, 65, were beaming with joy after receiving food aid worth RM50 and RM10 duit raya each in conjunction with Hari Raya and National Day.
This is a thoroughly deluded statement in many ways and if you do not know what to make of it, you think it is good then you do not understand or understand falsely.
Just because there are festivities around does not make it a season which by definition is a division of the year, marked by changes in weather, ecology, and hours of daylight.
You don’t ask others to spread cheer, which is demeritorious not meritorious because you want others to be a robot to do as you tell them. In any case cheer is not good but it is doing or saying things that HARMFULLY stir mental force in each other to like or be excited.
JUST BECAUSE THERE ARE FESTIVITIES PRESENT DOES NOT MAKE IT A SEASON.
YOU DON’T TELL OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TELL THEM TO SPREAD CHEER WHICH IF THEY LISTENED TO YOU, THEY BECOME YOUR ROBOTS.
CHEER IS NOT GOOD BUT IT IS ACTUALLY FABRICATED TO BE PLEASE AND IMPRESS EACH OTHER, TO STIR ONE’S OWN AND OTHERS’ MENTAL FORCES TO BE EXCITED BY PROCEEDINGS THAT IS EVIL NOT GOOD.
IF YOU MUST HAVE CHEER, HEAVEN MAY NOT BE THE PLACE FOR YOU BUT EVEN ETERNAL WOE IS THE PLACE FOR YOU.
THUS IF I AM CORRECT THEN ANYONE WHO DOES NOT VIEW THUS HAVE WRONG VIEW, DO NOT TRULY UNDERSTAND.
IT IS WRONG, BAD NEVER GOOD TO TELL OTHERS THIS IS A SEASON TO SPREAD CHEER. UNLESS WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS TO DO IS TRULY GOOD, YOU ARE ASKING FOR SUFFERING TELLING OTHERS WHAT TO DO, TO SPREAD CHEER.
Fate cannot be denied:
These two persons were swept away but survived from the same beach during the tsunami in which seven died. Today they were swept away to perish and it is said the boy behaved unusually in the run up suggesting that he had a premonition of impending death:
Quote: The two were swept away at the same place where seven people lost their lives during the Dec 26 tsunami in 2004. “The water was just knee-deep. But all of a sudden, the four of us were washed over by strong waves. My son was swept out to the sea and my younger brother went after him. He said his son's behaviour had been very different over the past few days, adding that the boy had been kissing him on the cheek and hugging him.
“I don't know why. Maybe he knew his time was up,” he said.
False associations to stir emotion:
The streets may be empty during the Hari Raya period but the scene at many restaurants tells a different story.
What is relevant is that restaurants are doing good business, that the streets are empty is a false fabricated association designed to stir emotional poignancy or conflict or contradiction that streets are empty but restaurants are full.
BECAUSE IT IS A FALSE ASSOCIATION, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY IN THE NAME OF STIRRING OTHERS’ EMOTIONS. THERE IS NO NEED TO BRING EMPTY STREETS IN TALKING ABOUT FULL RESTAURANTS, YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS IN FALSE ASSOCIATION WITH INSANITY THE FINAL OUTCOME FOR YOU.
A programmed style of speech:
To speak that the streets may be empty but many restaurants tell a different story is a programmed format of speaking copied from others.
THERE IS A COMMON STYLE OF SPEAKING THAT IS AIMED AT STIRRING EMOTIONAL CONTRADICTION OR CONTRAST OR ‘WOW’ THAT GOES LIKE THIS: WHEREAS ‘A’ IS ‘X’ ‘B’ IS THE OPPOSITE. THERE IS NO NEED TO CONTRAST, IF YOU WANT YOU CAN FIND CONTRASTS OR OPPOSITES EVERYWHERE, THEY ARE NOT RELATED TO EACH OTHER AND YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF AND OTHERS TO FALSELY PERCEIVE IRONY OR CONTRAST EVERYWHERE TO STIR ‘WOW’ IN YOURSELF AND OTHERS.
THE PURPOSE IS TO STIR ‘WOW’, THE STREETS MAY BE EMPTY BUT ‘WOW’ THE RESTAURANTS ARE A DIFFERENT STORY, ‘HO, HO, HO’.
Not just Anwar’s DNA but his sperm DNA needed:
In order to obtain a conviction of Anwar based solely on forensic evidence (no video or audio evidence), the prosecution must establish that Anwar’s sperm not just his DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
After three days before Saiful presented himself for examination and another two to three days when the samples were (incompetently) left at room temperature, you would expect DNA degradation according to expert testimony but ‘miraculously’ the DNA was pristine suggesting it was not genuine.
THUS THE FACT THAT THE DNA SAMPLES WERE PRISTINE NOT DEGRADED SUGGESTS THEY WERE NOT GENUINE BECAUSE IN KEEPING WITH CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE SAMPLES WERE SAID TO HAVE BEEN OBTAINED YOU WOULD EXPECT DEGRADATION.
IN CRIMINAL RAPE OR HOMICIDE CASES, DEGRADED DNA (EG HAIR AND BIOLOGICAL SPECIMENS THAT MATCHES THE SUSPECT CAN BE USED TO CONVICT THE PERSON BUT IN THIS CASE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER ANWAR SODOMIZED SAIFUL OR NOT, IF HE DID, THEN ANWAR’S SPERM SHOULD BE FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM AND YOU MUST PROVE THE ANWAR DNA FOUND CAME FROM HIS SPERM CELLS WHICH WOULD BE EXPECTED TO HAVE DEGRADED BECAUSE OF THE DELAYED PRESENTATION AND MISHANDLING OF THE SPECIMENS.
THUS FOR ONE WHO UNDERSTANDS THE FACTS OF THE CASE, HERE IS AGAIN EVIDENCE OF THE FABRICATED NATURE OF THE CASE.
Where did they get Anwar’s fresh sperm?
Anwar’s fresh sperm could have been obtained whilst he was in a lock-up from his underwear during his arrest or they could have paid a maid to steal Anwar’s underwear repetitively until they got one with Anwar’s fresh sperm.
The central issue in the Anwar Saiful case:
In order to convict Anwar fairly of sodomizing Saiful based solely on forensic evidence, the prosecution must prove sperm containing Anwar’s DNA was found in Saiful’s rectum.
The complication or specificity of this case is that Saiful presented three days late for examination and it was admitted specimens obtained was left in a cabinet at room temperature for a few days and in such circumstances it would be expected the sperm specimen from Anwar would show degradation rather than the pristine sample that was presented to court.
BECAUSE SAIFUL PRESENTED LATE AND THE SPECIMEN WAS INCOMPETENTLY HANDLED, IN ORDER FOR THE SPECIMEN TO BE GENUINE IT MUST SHOW DEGRADATION THAT IT APPARENTLY DID NOT SHOW.
Prosecution’s extraordinary faith in Saiful & his rectum:
Why has the system or ruling elite demonstrated such extraordinary unwavering faith in Saiful’s story and absolute certainty his rectum contained Anwar’s sperm?
If Saiful’s allegations of sodomy are fraudulent, designed to destroy Anwar politically then it is understandable why the authorities have stuck to Saiful and supported him at great lengths through thick and thin to get his case heard and completed to a final verdict.
If the case is genuine, Saiful was indeed sodomized by Anwar and seeking justice, the authorities are completely neutral, disinterested, it is impossible that they should know with CERTAINTY Saiful is telling the truth, not making up something that may not have occurred.
IT IS EXTRAORDINARY EVEN INCREDIBLE THAT IF SAIFUL’S ALLEGATIONS ARE TRUE THAT THE PROSECUTION WHO CANNOT KNOW IT TRULY HAPPENED, HAS SUCH UNWAVERING FAITH IN SAIFUL’S STORY.
It looks likely if not certainly that conviction will based solely on forensic evidence, specifically the establishment that Anwar’s DNA was extracted from Saiful’s rectum.
If the case is fraudulent and the prosecutors can implant illegally obtained DNA from Anwar when he was arrested (eg his buccal cell DNA from his toothbrush), then they can be absolutely certain of obtaining a conviction.
If this case is genuine, how can the authorities be so confident or certain that the DNA extracted from Saiful’s rectum can be traced to Anwar? The authorities even tried to pass a law making it mandatory for Anwar to give DNA so either they do not know Anwar’s DNA profile or it is a sham to get DNA to be implanted.
WITHOUT KNOWING ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE (BECAUSE THEY WANTED ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR MATCHING), HOW CAN THEY BE SO CERTAIN THAT THE DNA THEY GOT FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, ESPECIALLY WHEN IF IT IS GENUINE, NOT A PLOT THEY CANNOT KNOW IF SAIFUL IS NOT MAKING UP THE SODOMY ALLEGATION? NOT BEING CERTAIN, HOW COULD THEY HAVE COME TO THIS ADVANCED STATE OF PROSECUTION BASED ON SAIFUL’S ALLEGATION AND SUSPICION THE DNA THEY FOUND IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM IS ANWAR’S?
IF ON THE OTHER HAND THIS IS A PLOT TO DESTROY ANWAR, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF SAIFUL’S SODOMY DID NOT OCCUR, IT WAS INTENDED TO BE FAKED, THE DNA FOUND OR IMPLANTED INTO SAIFUL’S RECTUM WILL BELONG TO ANWAR, BY HOOK OR BY CROOK.
IT IS INCREDIBLE OR IMPOSSIBLE THAT IF THE CASE IS GENUINE THE AUTHORITIES COULD PURSUE THE CASE SO CONFIDENTLY WHEN THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN THE DNA IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR, THEY DO NOT EVEN HAVE ANWAR’S DNA PROFILE FOR REFERENCE SO HOW CAN THEY KNOW THE DNA IN SAIFUL IS ANWAR’S. WITHOUT KNOWING WITH CERTAINTY THE DNA IS ANWAR’S THEY ARE TAKING GREAT RISKS TO BRING THE CASE TO COURT SOLELY BASED ON FORENSIC CONVICTION.
The difference between Sodomy I & II:
Anwar was jailed for six years not for sodomy but abuse of power I think, the Azizan sodomy trial was a sideshow that smeared Anwar, it was based on the uncorroborated evidence of Azizan, Anwar’s wife’s driver and no DNA was involved and so it is likely prosecutors did not have DNA samples for reference leftover from the first sodomy trial which is why they even enacted new legislation to force Anwar to give samples for DNA.
THUS IT CAN BE ASSUMED QUITE SAFELY THE AUTHORITIES DID NOT HAVE SAMPLES OF ANWAR’S DNA FOR MATCHING APART FROM THAT OBTAINED FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH OR PERSONAL EFFECTS IN THE RECENT CASE THAT THEY KNOW WITH CERTAINTY CAME FROM ANWAR THAT COULD BE PLANTED. AND SO WITHOUT ANWAR DNA AS REFERENCE, HOW COULD THEY BE SO SURE TO PROSECUTE THE CASE BASED ON DNA THEY OBTAINED FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM THAT THEY CANNOT KNOW FOR SURE CAME FROM ANWAR?
IT IS NOT JUST A MATTER OF SHOWING ANWAR’S DNA WAS PRESENT IN SAIFUL’S RECTUM BUT IT MUST BE DNA FROM ANWAR’S SPERM, NOT BUCCAL MUCOSA (ANWAR COULD NOT HAVE PERFORMED ORAL SEX ON SAIFUL’S INNER SANCTUM OR RECTUM). IT APPEARS THAT IT IS POSSIBLE TO TELL IF THE DNA CAME FROM SPERM OR OTHER SOURCES AND IT WAS NOT SHOWN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR’S SPERM.
FURTHER IN THEIR HASTE TO IRREFUTABLY INCRIMINATE ANWAR, THE PROSECUTION PRESENTED PRISTINE DNA AS EVIDENCE WHEN ACCORDING TO EXPERT TESTIMONY, THE DNA IS EXPECTED TO SHOW DEGRADATION BASED ON THE HISTORY OF LATE PRESENTATION AND BEING LEFT IN A DRAWER.
THUS THE FOOL THINKS PRISTINE DNA WOULD PROVE THEIR CASE INCONTROVERTIBLY BECAUSE IT BELONGED TO ANWAR BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE LET THE DNA DENATURE IN KEEPING WITH SAIFUL’S DELAY PRESENTATION.
IT CAN BE REASONED WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY, NOT PROBABILITY THAT THE SODOMY CASE AGAINST ANWAR IS FRADULENT BASED ON INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND IT REFLECTS PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY THINK IT CANNOT BE KNOWN, ANWAR MAY BE GUILTY OR THEY EMOTIONALLY CONCLUDE IT IS A CONSPIRACY WITHOUT UNDERSTANDING WHY IT IS A CONSPIRACY.
IF THIS CASE IS GENUINE THEN THE PROSECUTION HAS SHOWN EXTRAORDINARY UNWAVERING FAITH THAT WHAT SAIFUL TOLD THEM THAT THEY CANNOT BE CERTAIN IS TRUE, IS TRUE AND THE DNA FROM SAIFUL’S RECTUM BELONGED TO ANWAR EVEN WHEN THEY HAVE NO REFERENCE DNA WITH WHICH TO MATCH.
IF THIS CASE IS A FRAUD AIMED AT DESTROYING ANWAR THEN IT IS EASY TO UNDERSTAND WHY THEY WOULD BE SO DOGGED OR UNWAVERING IN THEIR PROSECTION OF ANWAR.
THERE ARE NEVER PERFECT CRIMES, THERE ARE TELLING SIGNS THAT TELL THE DISCERNING WHAT IS THE TRUTH.
Anwar still hasn’t given DNA sample:
Anwar still hasn’t given his DNA as sample so how did the authorities know so confidently the DNA they allegedly extracted from Saiful’s rectum came from Anwar? If you say they got secret reference based on his toothbrush, then that is chicanery and it is dangerous to assume the DNA from the toothbrush must be Anwar’s.
ONLY WHEN A CERTIFIED SCRUPULOUSLY OBTAINED SPECIMEN DNA IS OBTAINED FROM ANWAR CAN YOU FAIRLY CONVICT ANWAR OF SODOMY. IT IS DANGEROUS AND PRESUMPTUOUS TO CONVICT ANWAR BASED ON DNA THAT WAS TAKEN WITHOUT CONSENT FROM HIS TOOTHBRUSH.
IF YOU TOOK A SPECIMEN IN FRONT OF WITNESSES THEN YOU CAN BE CERTAIN THE DNA CAME FROM ANWAR, IF YOU STOLE IT FROM ANWAR’S TOOTHBRUSH HOW CAN YOU BE CERTAIN IT IS NOT SPURIOUS AND YOU CANNOT USE IT AS A REFERENCE TO CONVICT ANWAR.
Adelaide abominable, holds no allure for me:
I spent more than a decade in Adelaide and now it is possible to listen to Adelaide radio stations via the internet. There are changes and there are things that never changed.
Listening to 5DN station now called Cruise Adelaide, I am reminded (without sentiment) the many years I spent in Adelaide and it was not fun but suffering even to terrible levels.
Listening to the advertisements and the ways disc jockeys speak reminds me how impersonal faked as personal, supercilious for show life is in Adelaide and like the man who has vomited out his food will not eat it again, there is no way Adelaide will hold any allure to me, nor do I prefer KL.
THIS IS A THOROUGHLY SICK WORLD AND RATHER THAN WONDERFUL LIFE IS IN THE WEST AND AUSTRALIA, IT IS ROTTEN, SICKENING, HEARTLESS, COLD AND CUT THROAT AND SO ANYONE TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS ALLURES BE IT AUSTRALIA, UK, SINGAPORE OR WHAT NOT, WILL SUFFER HERE AND HEAD FOR TERRIBLE EXTENDED EVEN ETERNAL SUFFERING. ONLY SOMEONE WHO HAS ABANDONED THIS WORLD, TO WHOM THIS WORLD HOLDS NO ALLURE, IS SICK OF THIS WORLD IS HEADED FOR HEAVEN.
US debt turns nightmare suddenly:
Suddenly the US’ debt levels turned nightmarish for various reasons.
The US spent or printed billions even a trillion to bailout the banks after the Lehman collapse and this overnight boosted like a rocket the US debt.
Together with debt comes interest payments that add to the debt plus a recession means falling GDP means less ability to repay the debt that remains the same or rising.
Through hubris, America launched itself into two very expensive wars that it could not afford and are totally unnecessary in Iraq and Afghanistan and for this George Bush has big karma.
A lot (>50%) of US expenses cannot be cut, a big part that can be cut is security or defence but there is great delusion and opposition to big cuts here and so the US is faced with difficult choices in trying to make ends meet that increasingly cannot meet.
Migrate to heaven not Australia:
The person who seeks happiness and security by migrating to Australia or whatever is always deluded and headed for woe even after he dies, not heaven.
The person who has given up his life here, has no interests in migrating anywhere, instead devotes his time to migrating to heaven is the wise man who is happy or content here and will be blissfully eternally happy after he passes away.
The first fundamental step out of suffering:
The smiling beaming faces, the clean cut smartly dressed looks are deceptions, always for show masks that hide serious deadly suffering that will end in some form of insanity, disease or suffering that leads to another eternity of perdition.
ALL BEINGS HERE WHO DISPLAY STYLE OR THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS (AND THIS MEANS EVERYONE HERE) ARE ROBOTS (NOT REAL LIVE TRUE BEINGS) GRIPPED BY SERIOUS DEADLY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT THEY ARE MERELY CONTROLLING AND WILL END IN INSANITY.
WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION TO SUCCESSFULLY ELIMINATE ALL FOR SHOW USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, THE BEING CANNOT ACHIEVE ANY MEANINGFUL PERMANENT ESCAPE FROM WOE.
WITH THE SUCCESSFUL ELIMINATION OF THE USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, HE HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND, ESCAPED THE PRISON OF BEING A ROBOT, EFFORTLESSLY FREED HIMSELF FROM THE SCOURGE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE, HAS ATTAINED THE FIRST HIGHER STATE OF MIND AND IS HEADED FOR ONE ETERNITY OR AGE IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
THE NEXT FUNDAMENTAL HIGHER STEP OUT OF SUFFERING IS TO ATTAIN THE CESSATION OF THINKING TO EXPERIENCE A UNIFIED MIND FREED FROM THE DISTRACTION OF THINKING AND IT IS A HIGHER HAPPINESS AND GIVES 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN.
THE THIRD STEP IS TO ATTAIN NEITHER STIRRING OF ONE’S MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE ANYTHING HAPPENING IN THIS WORLD.
Smartly dressed is purely for show:
Different people have different perceptions of what smartly dressed means and unless you are blind or totally undiscerning you cannot see yourself and others being smartly dressed.
People dress in ways they think is smart or impressive. Because they think it is smart, they think also that others will think it is smart and be similarly impressed.
PEOPLE DRESS EXPENSIVELY WITH A LARGE WARDROBE OR COLLECTION OF ‘ATTRACTIVE’ DRESSES (WITH ACCESSORIES LIKE WATCHES, RINGS, CUFFS, TIES, SHOES, PERFUMES AND WHATNOTS) BECAUSE THEY ARE IMPRESSED BY THE WAYS THEY DRESS AND THEY THINK OTHERS WILL BE SIMILARLY IMPRESSED.
THUS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SMART DRESSING IS FOR SHOW, TO IMPRESS OTHERS HOW STYLISH OR TRENDY OR RICH OR RESPECTABLE THEY ARE.
BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A TRUE REASON FOR DRESSING, IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ALL THOSE WHO ARE OBSESSED WITH BEING SMARTLY DRESSED, TO WHOM SMART DRESSING IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS ARE HIGHLY VALUED AND PAID ATTENTION TO ARE HEADED FOR INSANITY BECAUSE BEING SMARTLY DRESSED AND WORSHIPPING IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY.
THE TRUE PURPOSE FOR DRESS IS TO PROTECT YOU FROM THE ELEMENTS AND KEEP YOUR MODESTY.
Making statements with your clothes:
There are people who want to make statements with their dressing, want to project meaning with what and how they dress and this too is controlled insanity.
Thus Steve Jobs has his trademark turtle neck sweater and jeans that he is attached to, identifies with and finds meaningful when it is mad and he is deluded because the true purpose of dress is to protect you not to project your values and personality.
A crisis of confidence?
Quote: "What we are effectively going through is a crisis of confidence," said Tom Porcelli, an economist at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
This is a dumb thing to say and here you have someone touted as expert saying something stupid.
This is not a crisis of confidence but it is difficult economic conditions resulting in serious decline in confidence. If we are going through a crisis of confidence then by restoring confidence, by making everyone confident, the economy is restored. What about the severe personal and national debt burdens, are they the results of the crisis of confidence or is it the other way, severe personal and national debt burdens depressing demand and therefore hurting confidence.
THIS IS NOT A CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE, IT IS FAR WORSE THAN THAT, LOW CONFIDENCE MAY BE A SYMPTOM OF THE ECONOMIC CANCER RATHER THAN THE CAUSE. WHAT KIND OF EXPERT IS THIS?
The absolute irrefutable top priority for all beings:
There is only one absolute top priority for all beings to achieve that cannot be disputed or refuted by anyone.
What is this absolute top priority that cannot be refuted?
The identification and elimination without remainder of style, of all use of force to prolong (eg syllables), change speed and strength of force (loudness).
The purpose for existence of all beings even if they are deluded and wicked is to be happy and avoid all forms of suffering, to prolong their lives as long as possible and if eternal life is possible, nobody wants to perish but they want to live forever.
Without first abolishing style, abolishing all stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you cannot attain the first higher state of mind that comes with it one eternity or Age in heavenly bliss. Without first achieving the first higher state of mind you cannot progress to achieve the second higher state (cessation of thinking), the third higher state (neither stirring mental force to like or dislike anything) and thence the fourth highest state of mind (neither pain nor pleasure) that give respectively 2, 4, 500 eternities in heavenly bliss.
THUS THE ABOLITION OF STYLE IS THE KEY TO 1 ETERNITY IN HEAVEN, KEY TO THE SECOND HIGHER STATE (CESSATION OF THINKING) AND 2 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN, THE THIRD HIGHER STATE (NEITHER LIKE NOR DISLIKE) AND 4 ETERNITIES IN HEAVEN AND FINALLY THE FOURTH HIGHER STATE.
WHATEVER THE HAPPINESS OF A BEING WHO PRACTICES STYLE, IT CANNOT MATCH THE HAPPINESS OF ONE WHO HAS SHED STYLE, WHO NO LONGER USES FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS BECAUSE HE NO LONGER REHASHES, IS NO LONGER A ROBOT, HE IS EFFORTLESSLY FREED FROM THE TORMENT OF RELENTLESS RENEWING STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE.
EVEN IF THERE IS NO LIFE AFTER DEATH, NO HEAVEN AND HELL, EVEN IF STYLE IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL, NOT TO STRETCH SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS THE INCOMPARABLY HAPPIER AND SANER MODE OF EXISTENCE AND THE PERSON AVOIDS CERTAIN INSANITY FROM SENILE DEGRADATION OF THE MIND THAT IS THE LOT OF THOSE WHO PRACTICE STYLE.
IF WHAT I SAY IS CORRECT THEN I HAVE DISCOVERED AND TAUGHT THE HIGHEST ELIXIR OR KEY TO HAPPINESS, ESCAPE FROM SUFFERING AND EVEN ETERNAL HEAVENLY LIFE.
DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF ELIMINATING STYLE OR USE OF FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS, IT MAY BE ABSOLUTELY IMPORTANT IF HAPPINESS, AVOIDING SUFFERING AND ETERNAL LIFE IS IMPORTANT TO YOU.
If happiness, not suffering and eternal life is important to you:
If you seek happiness, want to avoid any suffering and want eternal life if possible then you have only one choice, one recourse and that is to pay attention to identify and eliminate all style, all use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness because it is the key to freedom from stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, freedom from being a rehashing robot and is the key to one eternity in heaven, key to the higher states of mind that gives even more than one eternity in heaven.
Anyone who is enjoying himself, happy, experiencing no suffering does not want to die, end his present happiness and so it is that he wishes his blissful state to continue forever, in eternity.
It is only someone who is suffering unbearably who wants to die, hang himself or put a bullet in his own head. Thus someone freed of style is happy, content in himself and not suffering and he does not wish to die and wants eternal life if it is possible and it is possible, even for up to 60,000 Ages or eternities according to the Buddha.
The new Bill Gates: Google's Larry Page
People are presented with this statement and they do not really understand what it means.
What it means is that people’s understanding are false and rehashed.
Bill Gates is Bill Gates and Larry Page is Larry Page, there is no need to depict Larry Page as Bill Gates nor is that ever true.
People have recorded understandings of everything they come into contact with and they consciously or unconsciously try to see what is happening currently in terms of those recorded understanding which is wrong and dangerous.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND LARRY PAGE AS HE ACTUALLY IS INSTEAD OF IMAGINING HIM AS THE BILL GATES OF THE PAST, THERE IS NO NEED TO DO WORK TO RECALL BILL GATES NOR IT IS TRUE TO PICTURE LARRY PAGE AS BILL GATES. NOT ONLY DOES IT SERVE NO PURPOSE, IT IS DANGEROUS TO PROGRAM YOURSELF TO SEE LARRY PAGE AS THE NEW BILL GATES.
Skeptical by both nature and training
"Scientists, skeptical by both nature and training, always urge a dose of caution when looking at any one event as evidence of climate change," he said in his opening statement.
People see nothing wrong with the statement that scientists are sceptical by nature and training when it is unwitting admission scientists are robots without true understanding.
Anyone with genuine understanding is NEVER sceptical nor gullible, readily embracing everything ‘thrown at them’.
Scepticism by training means it is programmed in them and so if scepticism is trained in scientists it is a programmed attitude and scientists are robots with fixed attitudes without true understanding.
SCEPTICISM IS NEVER ABOUT MEANING BUT IT IS ABOUT FORCE, A FLAT INDISCRIMINATE RECEPTION OF WHATEVER IS PRESENTED WITH SUSPICION OR REJECTION THAT MUST BE OVERCOME. WHY DOES ANYONE NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL IF HE HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, HE CAN SEE AS IT ACTUALLY IS WHAT IS PRESENTED TO HIM IS TRUE OR FALSE, PLAUSIBLE OR IMPLAUSIBLE? THUS IF SCIENTISTS ARE BY NATURE SCEPTICAL IT MEANS THEY ARE BLIND WITHOUT TRUE UNDERSTANDING ROBOTS, THEY ARE REJECTING PEOPLE.
PEOPLE WHO TRULY UNDERSTAND NEVER NEED TO BE SCEPTICAL NOR BLINDLY GULLIBLY ACCEPTING ANYTHING, SCEPTICISM IS A PROGRAMMING, A PROGRAMMED ATTITUDE OF REJECTION AND SO IT IS AN ADMISSION SCIENTISTS HAVE NO TRUE UNDERSTANDING, ARE BLIND WITH A PROGRAMMED SCEPTICISM.
No comments:
Post a Comment