Thursday, September 01, 2011


Absurdity and callosity of Strauss Kahn case dismissal:
Strauss Kahn through his lawyers acknowledged there was sexual contact but insists it was consensual.
Surely it is not the business of prosecutors to prejudge the case that on the basis the plaintiff is of suspect integrity the case is not viable.
WHAT IS THE POINT OF HAVING COURT CASES WHEN PROSECUTORS CAN DECIDE TO DROP CASES JUST BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT MEET STRICT FIDELITY CRITERIA?
THE ACCUSED HAS ACKNOWLEDGED SEXUAL CONTACT BUT CLAIM IT IS CONSENSUAL. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE POINTS FAR MORE TO ASSAULT THAN CONSENSUAL AND SO IT SHOULD BE THE COURT’S ROLE TO ACQUIT STRAUSS KAHN.
THIS IS A CASE OF BLATANT ESCAPE FROM JUSTICE BY THE PRIVILEDGED; SHE MAY HAVE BEEN PRIVATELY BRIBED.
IN A MICROCOSM IT REFLECTS HUMANKIND IS VERY SICK, IMMORAL AND ALL THESE WILL LEAD TO TOTAL SYSTEM COLLAPSE AND MAYHEM. FINANCIALLY, ECONOMICALLY AND ECOLOGICALLY MANKIND WILL DRIVE THE EARTH TO COLLAPSE.
An excuse never reason not to prosecute Strauss Kahn:
Strauss Kahn has not even bothered to deny sexual contact.
It is always an excuse never a true reason not to prosecute because the plaintiff is not a reliable witness.
Her past record is not reason to prove she is lying in this case.
The defence has to prove she is lying in this case to dismiss her allegations.
WITHOUT HEARING HER ALLEGATIONS AND THEIR MERITS, NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO SUMMARILY DISMISS HER COMPLAINT AS FALSE BECAUSE SHE IS UNRELIABLE.
YOU HAVE TO HEAR HER STORY AND THEN SHOW IN WHAT WAYS SHE IS FALSE.
TO SAY HER PAST RECORDS CONDEMNS HER CREDIBILITY IS TO EXHIBIT FALSE LOGIC OR FALSE LOGIC FOR A PURPOSE OR IN OTHER WORDS IT IS AN EXCUSE NOT TRUE REASON NOT TO PROSECUTE.
What about Strauss Kahn’s reputation?
If you want to talk about the maid’s seedy reputation you should also consider Strauss Kahn’s reputation.
There is ample anecdotal evidence he is not just a serial insatiable seducer but he is given to sexual violence, he has been described as being like a chimpanzee in rut, has some reputation for rough sex with prostitutes and so if anything they are both equally matched to cancel each other out and the case should be heard.
THAT THERE WAS SEXUAL CONTACT IS NOT DISPUTED. WHAT IS DISPUTED IS WHETHER IT IS CONSENSUAL AS STRAUSS KAHN CLAIMED OR IT WAS CRIMINAL AS THE MAID CLAIMED.
IF YOU ARE TO GO BY REPUTATION, STRAUSS KAHN IS EVEN WORSE, HE HAS A REPUTATION AS AN INCORRIGIBLE SEXUAL PHILANDERER THAT WOULD MORE THAN OFFSET WHATEVER SEEDY REPUTATION THE MAID HAS SO WHY SHOULD PROSECUTORS BECOME JUDGE IN DISMISSING THE CASE?
Excuses is practicing lethal false logic:
People think nothing about proffering excuses but they have wrong understanding here as everywhere they think they truly understand.
Giving excuses whatever it is, is training yourself to ascribe false reasons for things happening that is deadly, will kill you one day because soon these false reasons for things happening will seize you and you will do the wrong things because you believe the wrong reasons or excuses behind doing it.
CITING THE MAID’S SEEDY PAST AS REASON HER CASE IS UNTENABLE IS A WRONG REASON OR EXCUSE FOR NOT PROSECUTING. IF YOU KEEP GIVING EXCUSES (EG YOU CANNOT COME BECAUSE YOU WERE SICK WHEN YOU DID NOT LIKE THE PERSON) YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF (AND OTHERS) TO REASON WRONGLY, TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS NOT THE REASON IS THE REASON AND THIS HAS DEADLY CONSEQUENCES, WILL KILL YOU ONE DAY.
EXCUSES ARE WRONG UNDERSTANDINGS IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING OTHERS AND THAT IS TRAINING YOURSELF TO UNDERSTAND FALSELY AND IT IS NOT A SURPRISE PEOPLE WHO PROFFER EXCUSES NEVER HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING. EXCUSES METAMORPHOSIZE TO BECOME DELUSIONS AND THEY PERCEIVE THEIR DELUSIONS AS TRUTH.
Steve Jobs, cut down in his prime deservedly:
Steve Jobs was born in 1955 and so he is still very young but stricken by cancer needing liver transplant that suggests he has not much left in life.
Looking back at his looks and behaviour through the ages, he is cocky or arrogant and can be very nasty, his achievements are actually overblown and rather than reflecting the vicissitudes of life, what has happened to him befits karma, he is deluded and has serious deadly karma attached to his being.
Self-hurt not falsity causes lashing out:
By lashing out is meant the habitual explosive spitting, coughing and grunts that are NEVER due to physical need to spit, cough or grunt but it is ALWAYS a form of lashing out or attacking that has escaped self control or it is the harbouring of thoughts to harm others.
LASHING OUT MAY BE PHYSICALLY EXPRESSED AS GRUNTS, SPITTING, COUGHING OR DOING THINGS THAT MAKE OTHERS SUFFER OR IT MAY BE MENTAL, HARBOURING THOUGHTS OF HARMING OR KILLING OTHERS.
ALL stylish emotional people must harbour ill will, an urge to attack or hurt others or lash out because they are constantly using force to go against themselves to put on shows to deceive, please, impress and intimidate others that also subjects themselves to force that hurts them and this causes resentment that must be vented by an urge to attack others that must either be well suppressed (as in those who are cuckolded) or it leads to habitual lashing out in the form of spitting, grunts or coughing.
Some people conceal or bottle up their hostility so well they are not even aware but there are those who struggle to restrain their irresistible to lash out eg by emitting explosive grunts or coughs.
ALL EMOTIONAL STYLISH PEOPLE MUST HARBOUR ILL WILL OR DESIRE TO ATTACK AND HARM OTHERS BECAUSE THEY ARE CONSTANTLY USING FORCE FALSELY TO FABRICATE STYLE (PROLONGING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS) THAT HARMS EVEN KILLS THEMSELVES WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND INABILITY TO CONCENTRATE THAT MUST INEVITABLY LEAD TO RESENTMENT, HATRED THAT MUST BE VENTED AGAINST OTHERS THEY STRIVE TO IMPRESS OR PLEASE OR IT MUST BE REPRESSED SO WELL THAT SOME ARE LIKE EUNUCHS UNAWARE OF THEIR ILL WILL OR WISH TO HURT OTHERS EVEN WHEN IT IS PRESENT AND HIDDEN IN A VELVET LINED GLOVE. THESE PEOPLE SPECIALISES IN KILLING OTHERS SOFTLY, OF ADMINISTERING SWEET SOFT POISON TO OTHERS.
It is not being aware that what one says or does is false that is the cause of this resentment or hostility, often people even those who are supposedly quite intelligent are unaware of the falsity of what they say or do, so how can the awareness of falsity be the source of their recurrent explosive lashing outs as in grunts and coughs?
Instead it is the self-hurt that a person who is guilty of falsity whether he is aware or not that is the source of inner conflict and tension that must either be so well mind-bendingly suppressed or it is a conditioned irresistible urge to lash out or retaliate result in regular emission of spitting or explosive coughs or grunts.
IT IS NEVER THE AWARENESS OF THE FALSITY OF WHAT ONE SAYS OR DOES THAT GIVES RISE TO THE URGE TO LASH OUT AT OTHERS, OFTEN PEOPLE ARE UNAWARE WHAT THEY SAY IS FALSE BUT IT IS THE SUFFERING AS A RESULT OF THEIR FALSITY THAT THEY MUST SURELY EXPERIENCE THAT DRIVES THEM TO LASH OUT THAT LEADS TO MORE SUFFERINGS THAT LEADS TO MORE LASHING OUT THAT WILL END IN INSANE VIOLENCE EITHER SUICIDAL OR HOMICIDAL.
THE FASHIONING OF STYLE WHETHER CONSCIOUS OR UNAWARE COMES WITH A HEAVY PRICE OF SELF SUFFERING AND IT IS THIS INSOLUBLE CONSTANTLY RENEWING SUFFERING THAT FEEDS AN URGE TO LASH OUT AT OTHERS OR ILL WILL THAT IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS THE BUDDHA SAID LED TO THIS WORLD.
A life devoid of understanding, full of suffering they call happiness:
If they knew what they say or do is false or harmful to self and others, they would have true understanding and it is because they do not have true understanding that they are unaware what they say or do is false, does not make sense and leads to terrible self-harm that leads to self and other hate.
WHATEVER UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE HAVE IN THIS WORLD IS RUDIMENTARY IF NOT NON-EXISTENT, IF THEY HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING THEY WILL KNOW WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS NOT JUST FALSE BUT INFLICTS TERRIBLE SELF RENEWING INSOLUBLE SUFFERING UPON THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
WHAT PEOPLE HERE CALL HAPPINESS THAT THE NOBLE ONES HAVE FOUND IS SUFFERING, SO SAID THE BUDDHA AND SO EVEN THEIR HAPPINESS IS SUFFERING AND THEY ARE DELUDED OR HAVE WRONG OR NO UNDERSTANDING EVEN REGARDING HAPPINESS.
AND SO IT IS THAT PEOPLE HERE LIVE COMPLETELY UNDER THE SPELL OF FORCE THAT RUNS THEIR LIVES; THEY ARE DUMB NOT CLEVER AS THEY THINK. IT IS FORCE THAT THEY APPRECIATE, THEY FIND THE FORCE CHANGES (PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH) FULL OF MEANING, IT IS FORCE THAT THEY ENJOY (PLEASURE AND EXCITEMENT ARE PRODUCTS OF FORCE) AND THEY ARE HEADED FOR RUIN EVEN INSANITY AND THEN ETERNAL TORMENT.
A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING WILL KNOW IF WHAT HE SAID IS FALSE AND BECAUSE PEOPLE SAY MANY THINGS THAT CAN BE SHOWN TO BE FALSE AND THEY DO NOT KNOW IT, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THEY HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Rehashing overrules understanding:
Even if a person has true understanding, rehashing overrules or overrides it because rehashing is according to a recorded plan in his head and whatever is recorded is fixed, does not require understanding, merely retrieval and playback according to what is recorded. You can keep modifying these recordings but once modified it is again fixed and the dictator of what you say or do in which you are the robot executing it.
People’s false understandings are consistent even stereotyped and the only way for a false understanding to be stereotyped is if it is recorded and rehashed from recording.
IF YOU ARE REHASHING WHAT YOU SAY OR DO, IT IS FIXED, ACCORDING TO A PLAN IN YOUR HEAD SO WHAT IS THERE TO UNDERSTAND? WHAT IS THERE FOR A TV NEWSREADER TO UNDERSTAND? WHAT HE IS SAYING IS FIXED FOR HIM AND HE MERELY CONVERTS WRITING TO SPEECH AND SO EVEN IF HE HAD UNDERSTANDING, IT IS BRUSHED ASIDE IN FAVOUR OF MINDLESS MECHANICAL RENDERING.
BECAUSE PEOPLE’S FALSE UNDERSTANDINGS ARE CONSISTENT IN THEM, THESE UNDERSTANDINGS MUST BE RECORDED AND REHASHED JUST AS WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS ALWAYS REHASHED.
IF YOU THINK REHASHING REQUIRES TRUE UNDERSTANDING, YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION HERE AS EVERYWHERE ELSE BECAUSE EVEN IF THE PERSON HAS TRUE UNDERSTANDING, IT IS BRUSHED ASIDE WHEN A PERSON REHASHES AND BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME, THEIR TRUE UNDERSTANDING IF PRESENT IS PERMANENTLY BRUSHED ASIDE, ATROPHIED OR DEAD.
Steve Jobs’ deadly false logic:
"Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important thing I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life," he (Steve Jobs) said.
What is said reflects wrong logic and delusion and reflecting their common delusion and false logic people see nothing wrong when it has deadly consequences.
The right logic to the awareness that you will be dead soon is, as the Buddha taught, to abandon your life of striving and suffering here and seek peace.
Steve Job’s logic is that since I will be dead soon, I should grab as much as possible, squeeze as much out of life as possible in terms of achievement, fame and material success.
THE CORRECT LOGIC TO REMEMBERING YOU WILL DEAD SOON AND THERE IS SO MUCH SUFFERING IS TO ABANDON YOUR LIFE AND SEEK AN ANSWER TO YOUR SUFFERING NOT PLUNGE IN AND GRAB AS MUCH AS QUICK AS YOU CAN AS DELUDED STEVE JOBS AND THE HOARDS HERE HAVE REASONED.
The Buddha:
6. There are those who do not realize that one day we all must die. But those who do realize this settle their quarrels.
Steve Jobs: Unfortunately the day has arrived:
There is nothing fortunate or unfortunate about any day, it is false perception by him and his audience to see nothing wrong when it is deadly wrong because it leads to woe.
IT IS POSSIBLE NOT TO VIEW THE DAY AS UNFORTUNATE AND IF YOU MUST VIEW IT AS UNFORTUNATE IT MEANS YOUR MIND IS OPEN TO SORROW.
IT IS ONLY BECAUSE A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS STIRRED AGAINST HIS WILL TO FEEL SAD THAT THE DAY IS UNFORTUNATE, IF A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED, AS I CAN ATTEST MYSELF, HE DOES NOT FEEL ANY SADNESS AND WITHOUT FEELING ANY SADNESS, NO DAY IS UNFORTUNATE TO HIM, HE HAS GONE BEYOND SORROW AND THAT IS NEVER TERRIBLE BUT AN INCOMPARABLE RELEASE FROM SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO PERCEIVES A DAY AS UNFORTUNATE HAS WRONG PERCEPTION AND UNDERSTANDING NOT JUST HERE BUT EVERYWHERE HE THINKS HE UNDERSTANDS TRULY AND HE IS HEADED FOR WOE THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS AS VAST AS AN OCEAN.
Obama warns of 'historic' storm
President Obama warns that Hurricane Irene, threatening tens of millions of people as it closes in on the US east coast, could be a "historic" storm.
Everything that happens becomes history so what is he talking about. He is emotionally trying to emphasise the seriousness of the storm but he does not truly understand the words that he uses.
WHAT HE IS WARNING ABOUT IS A STORM OF ‘UNPRECEDENTED SCALE NOT A HISTPORIC STORM. A PERSON WITH TRUE UNDERSTANDING UNDERSTANDS WHAT HE SAYS AND HE WILL KNOW IT IS NOT A HISTORIC STORM BUT A STORM OF UNPRECEDENTED SCALE OR DANGER.
The nice and the nasty man:
What is the difference between the nice and the nasty man or girl?
The nice person speaks and acts as if he likes you, he likes everything he says or does or he dislikes in a liking manner, only when he ‘loses his cool’ will he turn nasty, dislike in a disliking manner rather than dislike in a liking manner.
By contrast the nasty man speaks and acts as if everything also he dislikes or likes in a disliking manner, only in exceptional circumstances when he is really pleased does he lets his guard and scowl down and demonstrate his like in a liking manner.
Being nice or nasty is a programmed indiscriminate attitude and the person is trapped in his niceness or nastiness and it is a form of controlled insanity that will end in uncontrollable terrible insanity.
A lot of the expressed liking of the nice guy is faked and even if they are genuine it is about a meaningless, stressful stirring of his mental force that is not doing any useful work.
THE NICE PERSON SPEAKS AND ACTS AS IF HE LIKES YOU OR EVERYTHING HE SAYS OR DOES OR HE RELUCTANTLY DISLIKES IN A LIKING MANNER CERTAIN THINGS. EVEN IF HIS LIKING IS TRUE, IT IS AN INAPPROPRIATE USELESS HARMFUL STIRRING OF HIS MENTAL FORCE THAT HE WANTS TO SHARE WITH YOU AND WANTS HIS RECIPIENT TO BE STIRRED TOO. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE HE CAN TRULY LIKE EVERYTHING AS HE EXPRESSED AND SO A LOT OF IT IS FAKED TO GET ALONG AND PLEASE OTHERS, IT IS A CULTIVATED ATTITUDE, AN INDISCRIMINATE FOR SHOW FRONT AND HE IS HEADED FOR INSANITY, MENTAL TORMENT.
SIMILARLY THERE ARE MANY WHO SPORT A PERMANENT NASTY SCOWL AND IT IS SIMILARLY AN INSANE ATTITUDE, CONDITIONED STATE OF MIND AND EXPRESSION.
Bad sleep ups blood pressure risk
Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say and the Buddha said there is proper and improper behaviour, proper and improper speech.
Bad sleep ups blood pressure risk is improper disrespectful speech without determining what is said is correct.
One speaking properly may say, “Poor sleep is associated with high blood pressure”. Bad sleep cannot up blood pressure risk, it may raise high pressure but not high pressure risk, risk is not something you can physically raise or up. Without knowing poor sleep causes high blood pressure you can say it does so, all you can say is poor sleep is associated with high blood pressure.
WHAT IS SPOKEN DOES NOT MAKE SENSE EXCEPT TO THOSE WHO ARE THEMSELVES SENSELESS, POOR SLEEP MAY BE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGH PRESSURE BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN IT ‘UPS’ (RAISES NOT UPS) BLOOD PRESSURE, WITHOUT KNOWING POOR SLEEP RAISES BLOOD PRESSURE ONE CANNOT SAY IT IS SO. IT MAY BE STRESS THAT CAUSES POOR SLEEP THAT ALSO CAUSES HIGH PRESSURE, SO BOTH POOR SLEEP AND HIGH PRESSURE ARE PRODUCTS OF STRESS, NOT HIGH PRESSURE THE PRODUCT OF POOR SLEEP AS IMPLIED.
You cannot raise or lower risk:
You cannot truly raise or lower risk, risk is not something you can raise or lower except in the false understanding of humans here as everywhere they think they understand.
Risk is not something that exists but it is fabrication of those who do not truly know the exact nature of something and yet want to assign probability of it happening. Risks is about chance and reality is not about chance, it is either the cause or it is not, it either occurred or it did not, what has risk got to do with it?
Thus the use of force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness leads definitely to rising stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate, it is never a risk to rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
People talk about risk because they do not know what is the cause, what is stated is not the cause because there are other factors that are involved.
IF SOMETHING IS THE SUREFIRE CAUSE OF ANOTHER THING, WHY CALL IT A RISK WHEN IT IS THE CAUSE OF THAT OTHER THING? IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU DO NOT KNOW IT IS THE CAUSE, IT MAY SOMETIMES NOT CAUSE OR THERE MAY BE OTHER CAUSES THAT YOU SPEAK OF RISK WHICH IS SPEAKING WITHOUT CERTAINTY THAT IS LAPSING INTO FALSITY. THUS IT IS EVIL AND FALSE TO SPEAK OF ‘RISKS’, EITHER SOMETHING IS THE CAUSE OR NOT THE CAUSE, NEVER THE RISK.
YOU CAN RAISE THE RISK OF SOMETHING AND STILL IT MAY NOT OCCUR, YOU CAN LOWER THE RISK OF SOMETHING AND STILL IT MAY OCCUR, SO WHAT IS THE POINT OF TALKING ABOUT IT, TALKING ABOUT SOMETHING ‘IFFY’? THE MAN OF TRUTH DEALS WITH CERTAINTIES NOT RISKS OR DEGREES OF POSSIBILITIES.
WITHOUT SEEING THE NATURE OF SOMETHING TRULY, HOW CAN YOU CORRECTLY QUANTIFY THE AMOUNT OF RISK YOU RAISED OR LOWERED IN SPEAKING OF ‘UPS THE RISK’?
IT IS IMPROPER TO SPEAK OF ‘UPS’ THE RISK. ‘RAISES’ OR INCREASES IS THE PROPER WORD TO USE.  
Hell is a certainty not risk for emotional people:
Insanity, suffering and hell are certainties for stylish emotional people, not a risk.
Unless they truly turn and are healed, they are not at risk for suffering, insanity and being thrown into the furnace (of hell), it is a certainty and so anyone who speaks of ‘risks’ is speaking without knowing, speaking falsely with demerit not merit attached.

Mirzan, San Miguel and Esso Malaysia:
Mahathir Mohamad on the one hand is using Ibrahim Ali to stoke up the Malay sentiments' anti-drinking, anti-everything for his return to power, while on the other using his son Mirzan to buy Esso Malaysia using San Miguel's beer drinking money.
By JO & M.Nathan
I am so utterly disgusted with the BN government for its inability to engage Esso Malaysia for the rakyat. I am further disgusted with the hypocrisy of Mahathir Mohamad on the one hand using Ibrahim Ali to stoke up the Malay sentiments' anti-drinking, anti-everything for his return to power, while on the other using his son Mirzan to buy Esso Malaysia using San Miguel's beer drinking money. Worse still, he is exploiting the tax incentives reserved for us the rakyat, the unimportant Malaysians.
If you remember, Mirzan surfaced as a director of Petron, San Miguel's beer company as the parent. Now he is using his brotherly influence on Muhkriz as the Minister of MITI to get the FIC approval and whatever else needed, for a deal which no decent government would ever allow.
Yesterday, the Domestic Trade Minister Sabri even said Malaysia cannot do anything about it. What a statement. The point is these Ministers are put there to safeguard our interests, not to spend time mixing with singers and artists so that his son Dafi can cut another album or so. Ministers need to protect the welfare of the rakyat especially when 80% of Esso customers are Muslim and do not want to have to change their lifestyle or travel another 25 km to pump petrol at another station that is halal, just to line Mirzan's pocket. For Mirzan everything can, for us unimportant Malaysians everything cannot.
Back to Mahathir, how can we the rakyat even think of allowing this Mahathir-Mirzan-Muhkriz beer for subsidy petrol scandal to occur? In the internet, so many people are complaining that even the minority shareholders are up in arms and considering a class action suit against Exxon-Mobil for the utmost disregard for minority shareholders.
We expect Exxon-Mobil to uphold the highest and most stringent standard of professionalism and integrity, whether it is in the USA or in another third world country such as Malaysia. But obviously our BN government doesnt seem to think that is important. It seems to think that what is good for Mirzan must be good for Muhkriz, and therefore it is good to rip off all of us normal Malaysians, and we must just swallow.
I wonder why the goverment has not hauled up Esso staff Mr Stafford T. Kelly who made several announcements on the manner in which he felt Exxon-Mobil divested San Miguel. The funny thing is, his valuation exercise was done in a highly irregular manner leaving us minority shareholders to question what is actually behind this deal, and who in Exxon-Mobil is benefitting personally from this deal?
First, everyone knows that the assets in Esso Malaysia are part of a listed company and thus require close scrutiny. It is precisely because of this we are shocked that Mr Stafford told the reporters that the decision to sell the Esso assets (at USD280 million valuation for the whole 100%) cheaper than the Mobil equivalent (at USD 400 million) have been sanctioned and approved by the Government of Malaysia tacitly.
One only has to examine whether the sales of the assets are mutually exclusive. Judging from the newspaper report, it is a packaged deal and not mutually exclusive. It is then very curious that the sales of the assets are cross-subsidized using the unlisted ones in Mobil to be subsidized by the listed Esso shares in Malaysia.
This is against the law but Mr Stafford knows the Mahathir children will follow the footsteps of the father to cheat all Malaysians. Since he has taken care of Mirzan (where do you think the difference of USD 400 and 280 million went?) he does not have to worry who he steps on. That is why the Bursa is so quiet even though this is clearly criminal. 
Second, it is obvious Mr Stafford has botched up the entire bidding and valuation exercise when he can announce to the world (and all of Malaysia) that the deal to his preferred partner San Miguel is final even before the Malaysian authorities have a chance to consider the Foreign Investment Committee ruling. Obviously he knows something we don’t.
He must know that it will just be Mukhriz telling his puppet Minister Mustapha to sign on the dotted line. Strangely, he is trying to rush something which needs due process, and behaving so arrogantly as if EXXON is more important than the interests of the rakyat under the BN government. If this is the case, I urge all Malaysians to vote them out this PRU-13.
Third, Mr Stafford goes on to say that the tax incentives benefitted from Malaysia for the Esso refinery will be passed to San Miguel (read as pass on to San Mirzan or maybe one or two more of Mahathir's children since he is after all THE ADVISOR to Petronas) simply because he says so - on the reasoning that San Miguel is going to invest some money into rehabilitating the refinery.
Come on, give us a break. We dont need Mirzan to use his ill gotten money as equity and then borrow to the hilt from the local banks and enjoy the subsidy by trying to say as though San Miguel is doing us, the rakyat, a favor. And then use the profits to fund Ibrahim Ali and make the non-Muslims look bad. Shame on you.
Let me remind you that we only have to ask the question in open court - where did the tax benefits given by the Malaysian government to Esso Malaysia finally accrue to? It will become obvious that this will lead to a bigger scandal than BP’s Gulf of Mexico burst oil-wells.
No American or French journalists take lightly individuals or corporations who evade tax. Also, Mr Stafford has no feel on whats on the ground as it is not about how much who is going to invest in the refinery as it is an afterthought (not to mention that it has been picked up as an attempt by Exxon to try to openly bribe the authorities as if Malaysia is so starved of Foreign Direct Investment). By jove, this will go to court, and Mahathir and the children after PRU-13 can hide behind a cage as they give their statements.
Fourth, the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPA) specifically prohibits any employee from concealing information from the tender committee be it in the form of shredding or disposing of evidence which would clearly show that the entire tender exercise was skewed to favor San Miguel. This is evident in the inability of EXXON-MOBIL to explain how a single executive like Mr Stafford was allowed to make such decisions which contravenes not only the laws of good ethical corporate governance, but also the follow up cover up and announcements of trying to justify his pick of the winner by saying that San Miguel will then invest heavily in the refinery. Who cares? A simple check on the phone numbers most called by the San Miguel local team will reveal and clearly show the trail to the EXXON-Mobil nest and of course to Mirzan and his 012345678 special number.
The same fate that bestowed Mubarrak and Gaddafi is awaiting Mahathir. And it would be silly of Mr Stafford to count on that rather than on good clean corporate governance which is what Exxon-Mobil has been built upon. For us simple Malaysians, I think we should stand up and say that if after all these years of benefitting from our subsidy as a foreign company in Malaysia, the least you can do if you want to exit is to do so graciously, and not so bloody arrogantly, not caring for the minority shareholders, and in the process, make a mockery of our government.
I used to be a long-time BN supporter. No more because I can see that this is not a government that will protect the interests of us the rakyat. Even as I read how the Muslim dealers have protested against this, everything is falling on deaf ears.
Esso Malaysia is supposed to be a blue-chip company, not material for a future B-grade movie with San Miguel booze starring Mr Stafford and Mirzan, tax evasion, shredding of evidence amid growing protests and boycotts in a country which is predominantly Muslim. Not to mention all of us minority shareholders will lose from the General Offer since we are getting a far lower valuation and subsidizing Mobil, and amortizing the big bucks which Mirzan wants to extract from us the unimportant Malaysians.
Doc: Papaya leaves can cure dengue
If he knows with certainty papaya leaves cure dengue, why does he qualify it with ‘can’? It is only because he is not sure, he is jumping to unwarranted conclusions that he qualifies it with ‘can’. Without doing exhaustive research ensuring what you said is true, you are foolishly jumping to conclusion touting something that he likely has vested interests that has deadly karma not merit.
PAPAYA LEAVES CAN AND IT ALSO CANNOT CURE DENGUE, SO IT IS NOT A MATTER OF CERTAINTY, YOU HAVE TO SIGN PROPABILITY AND BLAME OTHER FACTORS EG OLD AGE OR SEX OR WHATEVER WHENEVER IT DOES NOT CURE OR DELIVER. THIS IS LAPSING INTO COMPLICATIONS THAT LEADS TO INSANITY AND SO THERE IS A PLACE IN INSANITY FOR HIM AND THOSE FOOLISH ENOUGH TO EMBRACE HIS GOSPEL.
WHATEVER THE SUFFERING OF A PERSON IS DUE TO KARMA, IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO SUFFER WHETHER DENGUE OR WHATEVER MAKE SURE YOU DO NOT CREATE DEBT FOR YOURSELF, DO NOT DEPEND ON PAPAYA LEAVES. AS THE BUDDHA SAID, POISONS AND WEAPONS CANNOT TOUCH THE MAN WITH IMPECCABLE VIRTUES, WHAT MORE DENGUE?
Living effortlessly freely:
Even in this world it is possible for a person to live effortlessly, freely and it is incomparably happy.
When a person’s mental force is not stirred to be attracted to, repulsed by, to be sad, hurt, confused or fearful to things happening, his mind is not distracted by ever present thoughts, he does not use for show stress generating force to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness, he is truly said to be living effortlessly, freely unencumbered and happy without qualifications.
I HAVE EXPERIENCED OR TASTED FOR MYSELF THE QUIET INCOMPARABLE JOY OF LIVING EFFORTLESSLY FREELY BY ATTAINING THE STATE OF MIND OF BEING NOT STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, NOT DISTRACTED BY CONSTANT SPURIOUS THINKING AND BEING FREE FROM THE SLAVERY AND STRESS OF A ROBOTIC STYLISH FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH EXISTENCE.
A PERSON WHO HAS ACHIEVED THIS STATE DOES NOT DESIRE TO RETURN TO THE PAST WOEFUL STATES AND HE IS TRULY RELEASED FROM THE TERRIBLE TORMENTS OF THIS WORLD.
YOU MAY THINK YOU ARE A MASTER OF YOURSELF, LIVING EFFORTLESSLY FREELY BUT SO LONG AS YOU MANIFEST STYLE, CANNOT STOP THINKING OR ARE STIRRED BY THINGS HAPPENING, YOU ARE DELUDING YOURSELF, HEADING FOR WOE NOT SAFETY.
How Jobs made Apple great
It is never reason that makes someone write such an article and it is emotion (force) and vested interests that makes him do so and if you do not understand, you will be sold the con or propaganda.
Those who are interested in the Apple story will already know what Jobs achievements for Apple are and do not need to be reminded.
It is those who do not know, whom he wants to falsely convert by such totally unnecessary making much hagiography that is his target audience.
If what Jobs achieved is not great, it is crass exploitive commercialism that made the masses hysterical about what are essentially stylish media appliances then you are heaping karma singing his praises.
THE PERSON WHO THINKS APPLE IS GREAT AND JOBS MADE IT GREAT HAS A FALSE UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY, IT IS ALL ABOUT CRASS EXPLOITATIVE COMMERCIALISM AND YOU ARE TRYING TO BRAINWASH THE PUBLIC DWELLING ON SUCH SUBJECTS. THERE IS NO NEED TO TELL OTHERS HOW JOBS MADE APPLE GREAT, IT IS A FALSE FABRICATED MATTER WITH INSANITY THE PRIZE FOR THE FOOL. WHAT IS SAID IS A FORM OF PROGRAMMING, THOSE WHO READ MUST REMEMBER WHAT IS SAID AND BECOME PROGRAMMED IN ‘HOW JOBS MADE APPLE GREAT’ AND YOU HAVE DEBT NOT MERIT PROGRAMMING OTHERS.
What HP resurrecting tablet suggests:
The fact that HP could sell a tablet priced at $500 for $100 is an indication of the profit margin for such corporations that include Apple.
The fact that they have decided to ‘resurrect’ by manufacturing another batch to meet demand is CONFIRMATION that such fat profit margins are true.
IF SELLING THE TABLET AT $100 IS AT A LOSS, HP WOULD BE ACTING SUICIDALLY TO RESURRECT MANUFACTURE AT A LOSS.
Ignorance & false perception is always suffering:
Whatever you see and hear can be known to be meaningful or meaningless (for show to impress or please others) and if you cannot tell whether what you see or hear is true or false (for show, not meant) or you perceive what is false, for show is meaningful or true then that is always suffering never of a minor nature but deadly serious suffering.
If you cannot tell what you see or hear is true or false, you see what is false is true, you cannot truly understand.
THUS ANYONE WHO CANNOT TELL WHETHER WHAT HE SEES OR HEAR IS TRUE OR FALSE, WHO SEE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE DOES NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING.
Thus if you hear people speaking melodiously, ‘sweetly’ with rampant stretched syllables, changes of speed and loudness, you see singers swaying gently repetitively sideways, you see people clapping vociferously and you do not know whether what you see is true or not, you see it as true or meaningful when it is meaningless, then you do not know what you see or you see falsely and that is always suffering.
THERE ARE MANY THINGS ON DISPLAY IN THIS WORLD THAT ARE OBJECTIVELY FALSE OR MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW.
IF YOU CANNOT TELL THEY ARE FALSE OR FOR SHOW, ARE MEANINGLESS OR YOU THINK THEY ARE TRUE AND MEANINGFUL THEN THAT IS ALWAYS SUFFERING NEVER MILDLY BUT DEADLY AND TERRIBLY.
NOT TO BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT YOU SEE OR HEAR IS FALSE OR MEANINGLESS OR TO SEE WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE IS ALWAYS SERIOUS SUFFERING AND THE PATH TO FUTURE TERRIBLE SUFFERING.
IF YOU CANNOT TELL WHAT IS FALSE IS FALSE, WHAT IS MEANINGLESS IS MEANINGLESS THEN YOU DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING BECAUSE YOU DO NOT NEED SUPERNATURAL POWERS TO SEE THUS BUT YOU NEED TRUE UNDERSTANDING TO SEE THUS.

No comments: