Rehashed understandings lead to resistance:
If a person has recorded understandings that he rehashes to explain a situation he must experience resistance because that understanding is a fake, not specific for the occasion but it is a generalized understanding that at best approximately explains the situation. Only a person who truly understands a situation as it actually specifically is, is not stirred to resist.
Why is it that rehashed understandings, false understanding and failure to understand stirs resistance?
UNDERSTANDING IS AN ACTION DONE BY A BEING AND IF HE DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING HE IS DOING IT, HE DOES SOMETHING HE KNOWS IS FALSE OR WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE, HE MUST STIR RESISTANCE. THUS IF HE UNDERSTANDS FALSELY BY REHASH, HE FALSELY UNDERSTANDS SOMETHING OR HE FAILS TO UNDERSTAND SOMETHING WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND, HE MUST EXPERIENCE RESISTANCE OR DISTURBANCE OF HIS MIND.
Understanding is an action of a being:
Understanding is an action of a being just as speaking and doing things eg dancing, playing football or golf is an action.
And so in common with all deeds and speech, if you understand falsely by rehash, understand falsely, failed to understand when it is possible to understand you must experience self-resistance, conflict and thus suffer.
What is understanding?
Understanding is a mental picture usually in words or transcribed into words formulated (an action) by the person based on what the being sees or hears that may be accurate, as it actually is the case or it is inaccurate, very different from what has happened or it is rehashed, there is a standard recording in his mental jukebox that he has retrieved to paste on to explain the current event.
UNDERSTANDING IS A FORMULATION OR COMPOSITION USUALLY IN WORDS OR IMAGES DONE BY A BEING THAT EITHER TRULY OR INACCURATELY EXPLAINS WHAT HAS HAPPENED, IT CAN BE FRESHLY COMPOSED OR BE A REHASH OF A PRE-EXISTING RECORDING.
Perceiving and not perceiving are also actions:
Just as understanding, sweeping the floor and speaking are actions done by a being, perceiving and not perceiving are also actions done by a being.
You can perceive live specifically or you can perceive according to a program in your mental jukebox that tells you what and how to see, to look out for certain things (eg pretty girls or things to steal or of value) and avoid seeing certain things (eg ugly things). Once you have focussed your faculty of sight on something, some scene, you must also lose your focus or attention on all other simultaneous sights that are available for perception. The process of perceiving compels or forces you to also not perceive the infinitude of simultaneous other things happening at the same time, if you did not perceive you will also not not-perceive.
PERCEIVING IS AN ACTION SEPARATE FROM UNDERSTANDING THAT A BEING UNDERTAKES. AND JUST AS HE CAN UNDERSTAND WRONGLY OR FAIL TO UNDERSTAND, HE CAN PERCEIVE FALSELY (EG FEEL SOMEONE TOUCH HIM WHEN THERE IS NOTHING) OR HE FAILS TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS IN FRONT OF HIM.
THE BUDDHA SAYS THERE IS THE HIGHEST REALM WHEREIN THE BEING NEITHER PERCEIVES NOR DOES HE NOT PERCEIVE WHERE HE SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING, THERE IS NOTHING HE DOES NOT KNOW AND SO THE VERY ACT, DEED OF SEEING COMPELS YOU TO NOT SEE THE MULTITUDE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME.
THERE IS WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THERE IS WHAT IS PERCEIVED BY A BEING, THESE TWO ARE DIFFERENT THINGS AND PERCEIVING IS A (RESTRICTIVE) ACTION UNDERTAKEN BY A BEING.
Malaysian GST humbug:
Quote: But Mr Idris also said that although the population was 28 million currently, only one per cent of the population paid income tax. His suggestion: implement a goods and services tax (GST). This, he said, would also help make the country globally competitive as 140 other countries had implemented a similar tax.
Rather than making the nation competitive, the GST may dampen demand and crimp the economy more.
Buying binoculars 10 times the market rate is considered not corrupt, it is the profligate spending, the many overseas trips and lavish spending on unnecessary things that will bring the country to its knees if it hasn’t already. Apparently Penang had significant budget surpluses every year under DAP where it was deficits before. Thus cut off the corruption and there will be much more savings.
HE IS TRYING TO SELL GST BUT HIS LOGIC IS FALSE THAT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM. YES THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS GST BECAUSE IT IS RUNNING OUT OF REVENUE TO FUND ITS PROFLIGACY BUT IT WON’T COME CLEAN AND SO IT MUST SELL THE TAX TO THE PUBLIC.
The perverted argument for GST:
It is said GST will make the country globally competitive and it is intrinsically fair, it will only tax those who spend, not those who do not spend and so if you do not want to be taxed don’t spend.
If people don’t spend, how is it going to stimulate the economy and so if the tax encourages people not to spend it will dampen not boost the economy. Further for services that are essential, that the poor have to use (eg see doctors, buy petrol), they would be taxed where previously they weren’t and so it is impossible for them not to spend and because they have no choice but to spend on services and goods they need, they will be taxed where previously they were not.
YES, THE GOVT NEEDS TO RAISE MORE REVENUE BECAUSE IT CANNOT MAKE ENDS MEET BUT STOP TALKING HUMBUG ABOUT BOOSTING THE ECONOMY AND COMPETITIVENESS AND IT BEING FAIR, ONLY TAXING THOSE WHO SPEND.
Understanding the Greek & European debt crisis:
UK and the US too faced the ‘barrel of the gun’ of massive debts but they have temporarily skirted or postponed their problem by indulging in what is euphemistically called ‘quantitative easing’, printing of massive amount of paper and electronic money to cover their debts that is a form of cheating because this money is not from savings or reserves they have but printed without any backing.
Greece too have big debts that are coming due that it cannot pay and so have countries like Italy, Spain and Portugal whose debts are apparently even much bigger than Greece’s.
The problem with Greece is that it does not have its own currency that it can debase by quantitative easing to repay creditors but it is using the euro that is jointly owned by many countries including Germany which has big savings (in theory because it may be lent out and gone) and whose people are big savers and don’t like the euro thrashed by indiscriminate printing and so reluctantly they have hashed a deal in which Greece will pay half its debt using money lent by the EU’s established $1 trillion bailout fund and to soften the blow, they have recruited countries like China who holds big amounts of euro to lend to the fund for use in bailouts.
The (desperate) need to bail out Greece and looming defaults by Italy, Spain and Portugal is that there are derivative pay outs due should they be ruled to have defaulted (paying half the debt may technically averted a full default); if there was a default and there be a failure to pay out there might be catastrophic reverberations shaking the multi-trillion derivative industry.
UK shrewdly exited the ERM many years ago because its spendthrift, indebting way was incompatible with the ways of the fiscally disciplined, savings loving export juggernaut ERM giant, Germany, to join the euro would mean surrendering to a common currency that it could not manipulate because it did not own it.
The appeal for countries like Greece and Spain in joining the euro is that they will be joining a strong currency that enabled them to borrow LARGE amounts at low costs but they have spent their borrowings on useless things that will not contribute in future income to repay the debts. There was a common delusion that such borrowings would be spent to improve the countries and thus improved they would repay their debts ‘with their hands down’ or plenty to spare but it turned out the opposite, they have splurged their borrowings away on things that will not assist them to repay.
THUS THE REALITY MAY BE THAT THE SAVINGS THAT GERMANY AND CHINA (MAJOR EURO TRADING PARTNER) EARNED MAY BE LARGELY WORTHLESS BECAUSE THEY WERE BASED ON SELLING TO CUSTOMERS (LIKE GREECE) WHO BOUGHT USING BORROWED MONEY THAT THEY CANNOT NOW RETURN OR THEY COULD NOT AFFORD IT AND FURTHER, THE SAVINGS OF GERMANY AND CHINA MAY BE IN NAME ONLY BECAUSE THESE SAVINGS WERE LENT OUT RECKLESSLY IN SEARCH OF PROFIT AND MAY NOW BE ALSO LOST BECAUSE BORROWERS CANNOT REPAY OR WILL REPAY WITH UNBACKED PRINTED PAPER.
THE DELUSION OF THE PAST WAS THAT ALL THESE INDEBTED COUNTRIES LIKE GREECE WOULD BORROW THE MONEY AND DEVELOP THEMSELVES AND THUS DEVELOPED THEY WOULD REPAY WHAT THEY BORROWED WITH PLENTY TO SPARE AND BECOME MATURE ECONOMIES TO BOOT BUT IT TURNS OUT THEY HAVE SQUANDERED WHAT THEY BORROWED AND NOW THEY HAVE MASSIVE UNEMPLOYMENT (SPAIN’S UNEMPLOYMENT IS MORE THAN 20%) AND CANNOT REPAY DEBTS THAT ARE COMING DUE AND EVEN IF THEY CAN REPAY, IT WOULD GO TO WHITTLING DOWN THE DEBTS ONLY, NOT GOODS FOR THE PEOPLE. IF GREECE WERE TO DEFAULT IT WOULD TRIGGER DERIVATIVE PAY-OUTS THAT MAY NOT BE HONOURED AND THIS MAY HAVE DEVASTATING REVERBERATIONS IN THE MULTI-TRILLION DERIVATIVE MARKET. GREECE CANNOT PRINT MONEY AT WILL TO REPAY BECAUSE IT DOES NOT OWN THE EURO AND SO IT NEEDS THE BAIL OUT FROM A RELUCTANT SAVINGS LOVING, EXPORTING JUGGERNAUT GERMANY TO DO AND MUCH AGAINST ITS WILL, THEY HAVE COBBLED A FUND OF 1 TRILLION (THAT WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO BAIL OUT ITALY, SPAIN AND PORTUGAL) WITH AN AGREEMENT FOR CHINA TO CONTRIBUTE FROM ITS HOARD OF EUROS AND CREDITORS RECEIVING A 50% HAIRCUT THAT WOULD TECHNICALLY AVERT A TOTAL DEFAULT TRIGGERING PAY OUT.
BUT GERMANY AND CHINA’S SAVINGS MAY BE ILLUSORY IN TWO WAYS, BECAUSE BORROWERS USING THE MONEY TO BUY GERMAN AND CHINESE GOODS CANNOT AFFORD IT, THE GOODS WERE SOLD AND SAVINGS OBTAINED ARE IN NAME NOT REALITY AND SECONDLY THESE SAVINGS OF CHINA AND GERMANY MAY BE GONE, EXISTS IN NAME ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN SIMILARLY LENT RECKLESSLY SEEKING RETURNS TO BORROWERS WHO HAVE SQUANDERED THE MONEY AWAY.
Politicians and people to blame for mess:
The politicians are to blame for financial messes like in Greece and Italy. They have vested interests to borrow and spend because it stimulates the economy and keep people happy so that they would be re-elected. Further they spent borrowings on for show unproductive ill affordable projects that would reward themselves and what they corruptly siphoned off is considerable.
POLITICIANS BY CORRUPT OR INDIRECT MEANS SIPHONED OFF A LOT OF THE MONEY BORROWED ON THE NATION’S BEHALF AND LEFT THE PEOPLE WITH THE TAB TO REPAY. POLITICIANS STOLE $1 AND GAVE THE PEOPLE 10 CENTS AND THE FOOLISH PEOPLE WERE HOODWINKED OR HAPPY TO TAKE THE 10 CENTS AND NOW THEY ARE LEFT WITH THE BABY.
What bailouts tell those who understand:
The more massive the bailouts, the more serious the situation is.
There have been repeated massive bailouts, massive ‘quantitative easings’ and this means the problem is massive.
WHAT THIS MEANS IS MANKIND IS LIVING WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS AND IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO IN PERPETUITY THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.
THUS IF YOU HAVE BEEN LIVING MASSIVELY BEYOND YOUR MEANS IT MEANS YOU HAVE TO SERIOUSLY CURTAIL THAT UNSUSTAINABLE LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS WHICH MEANS A SERIOUS COOLING OF THE ECONOMY.
NOT ONLY THAT, THE SUSTAINED LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS HAVE BUILT TERRIBLE EVEN UNPAYABLE DEBTS THAT WOULD FURTHER ACT AS AN ALBATROSS, DRAG ON THE ECONOMY AND SO YOU CAN EXPECT SUSTAINED HARD TIMES, BELT TIGHTENING NECESSITATED BY A NEED TO LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS AND REPAY DEBTS THAT WERE SQUANDERED IN PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION PLUS LARGE SCALE PLUNDER OF THE SYSTEM DUE TO CORRUPTION.
Argentina tightens dollar exchange controls
The Argentine government has imposed new restrictions on the purchase of US dollars, in an attempt to reduce capital flight and tax evasion.
People wanting to exchange Argentine pesos for dollars must now explain where they got the money, and show they have paid their taxes.
America is the beneficiary of much wealth from all over the world stashed in its safekeeping that it has used, squandered off. Because of various reasons, many wealthy individuals all over the world have stashed their wealth in America that serves to boost the American economy and yet despite such considerable windfalls, America needed to keep printing currency without backing to keep buying from the world.
AMERICA PAYS FOR PURCHASES WITH THE WORLD WITH MONEY THAT IT CAN PRINT INSTEAD OF EARN LIKE THE REST AND IT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY PRINTING WORTHLESS PAPER TO FINANCE ITS PURCHASES WAY BEYOND ITS CONSIDERABLE MEANS.
THIS WORTHLESS PAPER MONEY PAID TO EXPORTERS AND OIL SHEIKHS IS FURTHER LARGELY DEPOSITED IN AMERICA FOR USE BY AMERICANS AND SO IN THEORY AMERICA HAS PAID BUT IN REALITY THE MONEY HAS REMAINED IN AMERICA AND BEEN ALL SQUANDERED OFF.
PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR VARIOUS REASONS CONVERT THEIR (ILL-GOTTEN) GAINS INTO USD AND THIS TOO IS ANOTHER BOOST TO THE US TREASURY THAT IT HAS SQUANDERED, OTHERWISE IT WOULD NOT BE IN THE DEBT RIDDEN MESS IT IS IN TODAY.
AGAIN AS THE CURRENCY OF SETTLEMENT, MUCH WEALTH ACCRUE TO THE US IN TRANSIT FOR INTERNATIONAL PAYMENTS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THE US AND HERE IS ANOTHER POOL OF TRANSITORY WEALTH IN TRANSIT THAT CAN BE TAPPED FOR CONSUMPTION.
AMERICA HAS MUCH TO BLAME BECAUSE ITS ABUSE OF ITS POSITION OF ISSUER OF THE CURRENCY FOR SETTLEMENT TO KEEP PRINTING MONEY TO FINANCE PURCHASES HAVE RESULTED IN THE WORLD PRODUCING FAR MORE THAN IT CAN AFFORD, TO CONSUME FAR MORE THAN IT CAN AFFORD LEADING TO TODAY’S DISASTROUS EVEN FATAL CRISIS.
Doing things for fun:
Quote: Sometimes you just want everything organised for you — even the fun, writes Bronwyn McNulty.
People speak of doing this and that ‘just for fun’. Do they know what they are talking about ‘for fun’?
When they say they do something just for fun they mean they do it for no purpose except to stir their mental forces to be excited or liking. Yet they see nothing wrong and see it as a perfectly justified motive to do something.
This is delusion because whatever is stirring mental force for no purpose except to be excited or attracted is suffering in itself and leads to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate for a while until they dissipate sufficiently.
IT REFLECTS PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SAY AND THEY ARE DELUDED WHEN THEY THINK NOTHING, THINK IT IS NATURAL TO DO THINGS FOR FUN, TO LET THEIR HAIR DOWN ONCE IN A WHILE. IF YOU NEED TO LET YOUR HAIR DOWN ONCE IN A WHILE IT MEANS YOUR LIFE IS REGIMENTED, YOU ARE A ROBOT CONSTRAINED AND CONTROLLED SO THAT YOU NEED TO ‘LET LOOSE’ OR GO WILD OR GO UNCONTROLLED ONCE IN A WHILE TO LET OFF STEAM. IF YOU DO SOMETHING JUST FOR FUN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY BECAUSE FOR FUN IS NEVER A VALID REASON FOR DOING ANYTHING. NO MATTER WHAT YOU MAY SAY, IF THERE IS STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE EXCITED WHEN YOU ARE HAVING FUN, IT IS TRAINING YOURSELF TO DO THINGS JUST TO STIR DANGEROUS BLIND MENTAL FORCE AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL REFLECTS DELUSION.
For fun and pleasure:
Whenever someone says he is doing something for fun and pleasure, speaking correctly he is saying he is doing something for the excitement (lust, thrill) it stirs and the force received on contact that is experienced as pleasure. It is usually mild force received through contract through sight, sound, touch, smell and taste that is experienced as pleasure but in masochistic cases, extreme force gives a perversion of pleasure to some.
Thus if you are seeking pleasure you are seeking contact with (usually mild) force through the senses, if you are doing something for pleasure you are doing something for the force received and this force received is meaningless, harmful leading to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate.
THUS A PERSON WHO SEEKS FUN AND PLEASURE IS SEEKING SOMETHING THAT STIRS OF HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY AND SEEKING SOMETHING THAT PRODUCES MILD FORCE THAT IS EXPERIENCED AS PLEASANT, PLEASURE; IT IS ALL ABOUT STIRRING AND SEEKING FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND FOR ONE WHO SEES RIGHTLY, HARMFUL. THUS WHOEVER SEEKS FUN AND PLEASURE IS FOOLISHLY SEEKING SUFFERING, EXPOSING HIMSELF TO DANGER AND IF YOU THINK IT IS FULL OF MEANING, YOU ARE DELUDED.
Sadness is something people recognize but don’t understand:
Sadness is an emotion or state of people’s minds that they all experience that they can recognize and speak about yet they do not understand.
PEOPLE EXPERIENCE SADNESS AND THEY CAN RECOGNIZE IT IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND WRONGLY WHAT SADNESS IS.
SADNESS IS ACTUALLY THE RESULT OF AN ACTIVITY OF THEIR MINDS AND SO THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING THAT CAUSES THE SADNESS AND BECAUSE THEY ARE DOING AND FEELING SAD WITHOUT KNOWING IT MUST STIR FORCE RISING IN RESISTANCE, STIR CONFLICT IN THEIR MINDS.
What do people understand by their sadness?
They understand it as something inevitable, part and parcel of existence, something that is unpleasant even occasionally terrible that they try to shake off by whatever means possible eg distractions, taking alcohol or drugs, sometimes they even foolishly seek sadness by listening to sad songs, act sad eg at bereavements, speak or play an musical instrument or sing with deliberate sadness etc. They even think they are good because they are sad, their sadness is good for themselves and others.
THESE ARE ALL FALSE, DELUDED UNDERSTANDING OF SADNESS THAT ARE DANGEROUS.
And what is the truth about sadness?
Sadness is the consciousness experience generated by the controlled or uncontrollable prolonging of their mental forces of going against self, triggered by events or spontaneously that their forces of self-preservation is struggling to control or losing control.
Sadness is dangerous and addictive so that each time you indulge in and intensify the force used in prolonging you are training yourself to be sad and intensifying your sadness that may descend into deep dark depression thence even suicide.
Sadness is not good for yourself or anyone else but it is meaningless (because it is generated by meaningless force prolonging without doing any work), evil, harmful leading to death and so whoever thinks sadness is good, they are good because they feel sadness is deluded heading for torment.
Sadness has a cause in the constant use of force to prolong or stretch syllables or units of motion in order to fashion style to please and impress others.
BECAUSE A PERSON IS FECKLESSLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG TO FASHION HIS STYLE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS WELL TRAINED TO PROLONG AND WHEN IT PROLONGS AUTOMATICALLY OUT OF CONTROL THE PERSON EXPERIENCES GENUINE SADNESS THAT IS NOT A SIGN OF VIRTUE BUT THE INEVITABLE EVIL FRUIT OF HIS FECKLESS SHOWMANSHIP.
THE PERMANENT EFFORTLESS CURE TO SADNESS IS TO PAY ATTENTION TO PERSISTENTLY ELIMINATE USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES AND ONCE YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS CURED OFF ITS AUTOMATED TENDENCY TO PROLONG, IT IS THE END OF THE CURSE OF SADNESS.
PEOPLE EXPERIENCE AND RECOGNISE SADNESS BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND SADNESS OR UNDERSTAND SADNESS FALSELY. AND SADNESS IS THE RESULT OF WHAT THEIR MENTAL FORCE IS DOING THAT THEY ARE DOING WITHOUT KNOWING AND THIS MUST STIR RESISTANCE AND CONFLICT.
Do you enjoy being a donkey carrying weapons?
Kenya warns of al-Shabab donkeys
Kenya's military spokesman says large groups of donkeys in Somalia will be considered "al-Shabab activity" following reports the militants are using the animals to transport weapons.
There are male and female donkeys and they can be used (abused) by humans to transport arduously, dangerously weapons of war. It may be true there is no possibility of you ending up as a donkey yourself to suffer terrible abuse at the hands of men or it may be true you are in danger of being an animal suffering even endless eternal abuse at the hands of others instead of blissful toil free existence in heaven.
What determines whether you suffer after you die even for an eternity is what bad you do to others that results in karma to be repaid as suffering.
Having said that, the One Well-Gone said further:
The global financial crisis is so real but it is all delusion:
Yes, there is a serious even deadly so real financial, economic crisis threatening the world but it is all delusion, exists because of the intransigence, selfishness and greed of all the participants.
Money has no intrinsic values, its value is assigned and so you can print as much money as you like so that values alter drastically but there is nothing to say the former value is correct and the current value is incorrect.
Gold is now worth $1000 per ounce where it was worth $30 per ounce in the past. Who is to say which is right? They are both right and wrong, you cannot assign a value to an item except in delusion.
IF OVERNIGHT GREECE’S CREDITORS RENOUNCE THEIR CLAIMS TO THE DEBTS GREECE OWES, THAT IS THE END OF THE DEBT CRISIS. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT RENOUNCE THEIR CLAIMS AND WANT THEIR MONEY BACK THAT SUCH A CRISIS HAS ERUPTED.
A Mercedes or Honda can be manufactured for free provided the raw materials are available, the machines to transform the raw materials into components are available, energy to power the manufacture is available and workers to put them together are available and have been fed. The high values of the cars reflect arbitrary and profit considerations and so provided the means are available to manufacture a Mercedes or Honda, it can be done for no charge or no price so long as the people involved are not concerned about making a profit.
MONEY HAS NO INTRINSIC VALUES, YOU CAN ASSIGN WHATEVER VALUE YOU LIKE AND KEEP PRINTING AS MUCH MONEY AS YOU LIKE, IT IS WHEN PEOPLE LOSE CONFIDENCE IN THE VALUE OF THE CURRENCY THAT IT COLLAPSES AND NO LONGER BECOME A SYMBOLIC VEHICLE OF VALUE.
MONEY ONLY EXISTS BECAUSE OF SELFISHNESS AND GREED, THE NEED TO HOARD TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHERS AND LAY CLAIMS ON OTHERS. IN A REALM WHERE EVERYONE IS WILLING TO SHARE EVERYTHING THERE IS PLENTY TO GO AROUND. A LOT OF WEALTH IN THIS WORLD IS WASTED IN FRUITLESS SENSELESS PURSUITS (EG ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY, GAMBLING, BEVERAGES, TOURISM, FASHION, MUSIC, SPORTS), IF ALL THE RESOURCES ARE DIVERTED TO ESSENTIALS TO KEEP PEOPLE CLOTHED AND FED, EATING ESSENTIALLY RATHER THAN LAVISHLY AND THROWING OUT PERFECTLY GOOD FOOD, THERE WILL BE ENOUGH TO SPARE RATHER THAN FAMINE.
THUS ALL THESE FINANCIAL CRISES ARE THE RESULT OF MAN’S INTRANSIGENCE, SELFISHNESS AND GREED, HIS PROFITEERING AND REFUSAL TO SHARE, HIS HOARDING TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHERS THAT HAVE RESULTED IN THIS MESS THAT THREATEN TO ENGULF AND DESTROY HIM WITH SOCIAL ANARCHY AND FAMINE.
Quantitative easing is a form of default:
Quantitative easing or the flooding of the system with massive amounts of newly printed money is a form of default, reneging on your debts, dilutes the value of the debt others hold over you.
It is because the debt riding on the system is far more than the wealth in the system and those owing are running into trouble keeping up with repayment or cannot continue to repay that such shenanigans like massively printing money in lieu of stopped debt servicing is necessary.
SO LONG AS THOSE WHO BORROWED SERVICED THEIR DEBTS EVERYTHING IS FINE. BUT IF THEY STOP SERVICING THEN BECAUSE THE DEBT IN THE SYSTEM IS FAR GREATER THAN THE WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM, THOSE IN CHARGE MUST RESORT TO CHEATING, TO PRINTING MONEY TO COVER IN ORDER TO AVOID HAVING TO DECLARE INSOLVENCY OR THE INABILITY TO MEET COMMITMENTS.
BY PRINTING MONEY THEY HAVE FULFILLED THEIR COMMITMENTS BUT IT IS ALL A MIRAGE.
The Buddha’s Advice:
The Buddha’s advice cannot be refuted by anyone, divine, human or devil and so it is that whoever wishes an end to his suffering must undertake one way or another what He prescribed, if you do not, you will never see the end of torment because there is no other way out of torment except the way he pointed out.
"Having seen people contending like fish in a little water, fear entered me. The world is everywhere insecure, every direction is in turmoil; desiring an abode for myself I did not find one uninhabited. When I saw contention as the outcome, aversion increased in me; but then I saw an arrow here, difficult to see, set in the heart. Pierced by it, once runs in every direction, but having pulled it out one does not run nor does one sink.
"Whatever are worldly fetters, may you not be bound by them! Completely break down sensual desires.
"A sage should be truthful, not arrogant, not deceitful, not given to slandering others, and should be without anger. He should remove the evil of attachment and wrongly directed longing; he should conquer drowsiness and sloth. He should not lapse into untruth nor generate love for sense objects. He should not delight in what is past, nor be fond of what is new, nor sorrow for what is disappearing, nor crave for the attractive.
"Greed, I say, is a great flood; a whirlpool sucking one down, a constant yearning, seeking a hold, continually in movement; difficult to cross is the morass of desire. A sage does not deviate from truth, standing on firm ground; renouncing all, he is truly called 'calmed.'
"Having actually experienced the Dhamma he has realized the highest knowledge. He comports himself correctly and does not envy anyone here. He who has left behind sensual pleasures, an attachment difficult to leave behind, does not grieve nor have any longing.
"Dry out that which is past, let there be nothing for you in the future. If you do not grasp at anything in the present you will go about at peace. One who, has no cherishing of it as 'mine,' and who does not grieve for what is non-existent suffers no loss in the world. For him there is no thought of anything as 'this is mine' or 'this is another's'; realizing, 'nothing is mine,' he does not grieve.
"To be not callous, not greedy, at rest and unruffled by circumstances. For one who does not crave, who has understanding, there is no production (of new kamma). Refraining from initiating (new kamma) he sees security everywhere. A sage does not speak in terms of being equal, lower or higher. Calmed and without selfishness he neither grasps nor rejects."
Be fair to PM’s family
LETTERS/SURAT
Saturday, 05 November 2011
He thinks he speaks great sense and good but he is deluded.
YOU NEVER SPEAK TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO ANYONE ELSE, YOU SPEAK BECAUSE SOMETHING IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL AND SO IF YOU ASK SOMEONE TO SPEAK IN FAIRNESS YOU ARE ASKING SOMEONE TO SPEAK FALSELY NOT TRULY.
IF YOU SPEAK TRULY IT IS NOT TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO ANYONE AND SO ANYONE WHO ASKS OTHERS TO SPEAK FAIRLY IS ASKING OTHERS TO SPEAK FOR A FALSE NOT GOOD PURPOSE AND HE IS DELUDED.
Why he is wrong to ask others to be fair:
If he knows the allegations are false then he should say the allegations are false instead of telling others to be fair.
If he does not know if the allegations are false, how does he know if people are not speaking the truth, being unfair?
WITHOUT KNOWING THAT THE ALLEGATIONS ARE FALSE, HE IS SPEAKING FALSELY ASKING FOR KARMA ASKING OTHERS TO BE FAIR IMPLYING THEY ARE SPEAKING MALICIOUSLY.
IF HE KNOWS THE ALLEGATIONS ARE FALSE, HE SHOULD SAY SO RATHER THAN ASK OTHERS TO BE FAIR.
THUS HE IS A FOOL SPEAKING FOOLISHLY, A BUSYBODY ASKING FOR KARMA NOT MERIT.
To be fair is to pander to, please:
Because stylish emotional people are always seeking to please and impress others, it is expected that they would seek others to speak to please or be fair or pander to others.
TO PANDER TO, PLEASE OR BE FAIR TO OTHERS IS A MAD REASON FOR SPEAKING AND SO IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN MADNESS.
YOU SPEAK BECAUSE SOMETHING IS TRUE AND RELEVANT TO THE MATTER AT HAND, NOT TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO OTHERS.
Trying to deny and establish his credentials for impartiality:
What has his neutrality got to do with his call for fairness? He is presumptuously trying to establish his impartiality so that his call for fairness is credible.
Quote: I have not met Datin Seri Rosmah or her children. Neither do I have any connection with the prime minister’s family but I am a regular reader of The Malaysian Insider and other news websites and I think many people have been unfair to her.
Why does he think they are unfair to her? Say precisely where they are speaking falsely about her, not unfair to her.
There is no need to establish your credentials for impartiality except to falsely lend credence to your position that people are unfair.
It is mad to say vaguely they are unfair, say they are wrong or false in what they say.
Beware who you uphold:
The person is either an apologist or closet partisan.
Beware who you uphold. Sure there are those who cross the line into rabid slander but are the victims themselves blameless, have they similarly indulged in slander of others?
IF THOSE WHO ARE MALIGNED OR BEEN UNFAIRED TO ARE THEMSELVES NOT INNOCENT, HAVE ALSO BEEN GUILTY OF BEING UNFAIR TO OTHERS, YOU ARE MAD TO CALL FOR FAIRNESS.
IF YOU ASK OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO YOU, HAVE YOU ALSO BEEN FAIR TO OTHERS? IF YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN UNFAIR TO OTHERS, WHY SHOULD YOU EXPECT OTHERS TO TREAT YOU FAIRLY AND SO YOU ARE DELUDED TO ASK FOR ONE SIDED FAIRNESS.
Is this fair?
All those clips of Anwar with the prostitute repeatedly screened by TV3 before prime news time, is that fair?
IF THAT IS NOT FAIR THEN WHAT ARE YOU BAYING ABOUT FAIRNESS IN THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA?
Be fair is a rule, robo-speak:
Be fair is a vague, non-specific rule or the speech of robots.
The person who is not a robot does not speak in generalizations, non-specifics, ‘being fair’ but he addresses specifically the matter at hand on a case by case basis whether it is true, justified or relevant.
A plea to be fair only make sense to people who are robots who have no true understanding, it is a programming, a rule to be adopted or rejected.
‘BE FAIR’ IS NON-SPECIFIC, CAN BE APPLIED TO MANY SITUATIONS, IT IS A RULE AND ALL THOSE WHO ADOPT ARE ROBOTS WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE MATTERS AT HAND. TO TELL OTHERS BE FAIR IS MEANINGLESS, INDISCRIMINATE, IT DOES NOT SPECIFY WHAT THE MATTER IS AT HAND.
Why it is absurd to be fair:
To be fair is to treat two sides equally or impartially and in the matter of allegations being directed at someone, it is a matter of ascertaining the truth not being impartial or treating both sides as equal.
BEING FAIR OR IMPARTIAL DOES NOT APPLY IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS DIRECTED AT SOMEONE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER THEY ARE TRUE OR FALSE AND IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, YOU JUST DO NOT KNOW, YOU DO NOT BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO THEM WHICH DOES NOT APPLY AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE REFLECTS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
The matter of being fair, of treating two opposing sides equally or impartially does not arise and so it is absurd to talk about fairness or not favouring one side.
WHENEVER THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING SIDES TO A STORY, EITHER BOTH ARE WRONG OR ONLY ONE IS RIGHT AND THE OTHER IS WRONG AND IN THIS CASE IT IS NOT A MATTER OF BEING FAIR TO BOTH BUT DETERMINING WHO IS RIGHT AND WRONG OR IF BOTH ARE WRONG.
You still need to be fair?
Fairness only applies if you are not sure about the nature of someone and in order not to besmirch his good image or reputation you must be fair to him, not cast innuendos.
If the nature of the person is open for all to see, can be determined by facts in the public domain (his speech and actions) and you are still in doubt and uncertainty, think there is a good image to maintain then you are deluded. It does not matter whether the allegations are true or false, the person’s true nature can be known by his speech and actions and if you still speak of the need to be fair, it reflects delusion.
Fairness like democracy is a human delusion:
Fairness or equality does not exist; it is a false, untenable human fabrication just like democracy. Nature does not correspond with fairness and equality except in human delusion it does.
Democracy upholds freedom of speech and respect of an individual’s differing speech. There is no freedom of speech in this world except if you want to pay for it with your head. Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say, if you think that is freedom of speech, you may be right or a big fool, whatever you say must be true and not harm others unless you want judgment and punishment. In any matter if there are two differing opinions then either both are wrong or only one is right and the other is wrong so all this talk about freedom of speech and respect for others’ differing opinions cannot be based on truth but based on pretence, condescension, and so it is for one who discerns.
In the same way, karma exists, there is goodness that leads to good results (never bad results) and badness that leads to bad results (never good results) but fairness does not exist and reality not just here but in the heavenly world does not correspond to fairness but karma.
The Buddha said even a trifling deed can send the man of little merit to hell whilst the same in one with much merit is experienced as a momentary suffering, if a king’s minister takes a goat from you, you are not entitled to punish him but if you owe even a penny and cannot pay, you can be thrown into jail. Beings in this world are never equals but there is even an extreme infinite scale from inferior (eg wisdom) to superior (eg wisdom) between beings. You are not God’s equal and so you cannot claim equality with God, the Buddha said there is no one who is his equal, he alone is sumbuddha, even amongst those who became enlightened by him, he alone is perfect, if he was to share equal or look up to anyone his head would split because he would be guilty of falsity.
Equality or fairness is a hypocritical concept created by deceitful humans that they pay lip service to and refer to when it suits them to get what they want (eg support) from others.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DO NOT WANT OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO THEM, THEY EXPECT FAVOURS AND THEY CANNOT TRULY TREAT OTHERS AS EQUALS BECAUSE THEY HAVE VESTED INTERESTS, THEY SIDE WITH THEIR OWN KIND AND THEY HAVE ILL WILL AND SO ALL THIS TALK ABOUT FAIRNESS IS HYPOCRITICAL OR BLINDLY ACCORDING TO RULES OR PROGRAMMED FIXED RIGID ACCORDING TO RULES FAIRNESS.
FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY DOES NOT EXIST IN THIS WORLD BECAUSE BEINGS ARE NOT ONLY NOT EQUAL BUT THEY ARE EVEN EXTREMELY UNEQUAL AND THOSE WHO ARE NOT EQUAL CANNOT DEMAND EQUALITY FROM THOSE THEY ARE NOT EQUAL TO.
INSTEAD OF EQUALITY OR FAIRNESS, THERE IS KARMA, PUNISHMENT OR SUFFERING FOR BAD AND REWARD IN HAPPINESS AND IT IS WHAT YOU (NOT OTHERS) SAY OR DO, THAT WILL DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING. EVEN A TRIFLING DEED CAN SEND YOU TO HELL AND PUNISHMENT FOR YOUR SINS HERE AS A HUMAN CAN RESULT EVEN IN AN ETERNITY EVEN MANY ETERNITIES IN HELL.
Getting a taste of your own medicine:
If you yourself have spread lies, have slandered others publicly, you should not expect others not spread lies about you and you should not be angry even furious when people spread falsities about you and so if you defend another, tell others to be fair to him, make sure he is a fair person because if he is unfair and can be proven objectively to be unfair, you are asking for karma asking others to be fair to a person who is himself unfair, has demonstrated objectively many times he is not averse to telling lies that slander others.
Why they can never be truly fair:
In order to be truly fair, you must see things clearly as they actually are, not as you like or dislike it to be, you must not side with anyone or yourself, have no vested interests or greed and you must have wisdom, of what is right and wrong, what leads to suffering and what leads to true happiness.
Because people in this world never see things clearly as they actually are, they like and dislike everything they see, they take sides have vested interests and they lack wisdom, do not know what is false and harmful and leads to suffering and what is true and benevolent and leads to happiness, it is impossible they can ever be fair to anyone.
EVEN THEMSELVES THEY ARE NOT TRUE TO, HOW ARE THEY EXPECTED TO BE TRUE TO OTHERS; IF THEY ARE NOT TRUE TO OTHERS THEIR FAIRNESS IS JUST EMPTY BLABBER.
Beings are not equal in being and achievements and so they cannot demand equality from each other. Beings must bow to the Buddha not the Buddha to others even brahmas.
" There is the case where a person is undeveloped in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: restricted, small-hearted. A trifling evil deed takes him to hell.
" There is the case where a certain individual is developed in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted. A trifling evil deed is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment.
"Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of water. Would the water in the cup become salty and unfit to drink?"
"Yes, lord. There being only a small amount of water in the cup, it would become salty."
"Now suppose a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River Ganges. Would the water in the River Ganges become salty?"
"It's just as when a goat butcher is empowered to beat or bind or slay a person is of little wealth when he has stolen a goat. But he is not empowered to beat or bind or slay a person is wealthy, with many possessions; a king or a king's minister.
"Monks, for anyone who says, 'In whatever way a person makes kamma, that is how it is experienced,' there is no living of the holy life. But for anyone who says, 'When a person makes kamma to be felt in such & such a way, that is how its result is experienced,' there is the opportunity for the right ending of stress."
Why fairness is about falsity not truth:
Fairness only applies if you do not know the correctness of a decision and you nevertheless want to take action and therefore you take into consideration the interests of the parties involved or you want to make a decision not considering truth or correctness but to pander to or appease or satisfy the interests of parties involved.
For one who is discerning, who sees things truly as it actually, the truth about any situation can be known and thus knowing, the right action or decision is never in doubt and there is no question of being fair or taking the interests of parties into consideration.
IF YOU KNOW THE RIGHT ACTION OF A SITUATION, WHAT IS THERE TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR ABOUT? INTERESTS OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THE RIGHT DECISION SHOULD BE. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU DO NOT KNOW AND YET YOU CHOOSE TO ACT THAT YOU HAVE TO ‘STRIVE’ TO BE FAIR TO THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED. IF YOU TAKE ACTIONS WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IS TRUE OR RIGHT YOU ARE LAPSING INTO FALSITY WITH SUFFERING DUE.
IN ANY MATTER THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED SHOULD NOT BE A CONSIDERATION, YOU DO NOT TAKE A DECISION TO BE FAIR TO ALL PARTIES BUT WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT IS THE CORRECT ACTION TO TAKE AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAIRNESS.
IF THE TRUTH OR CORRECTNESS OF A MATTER DOES NOT MATTER BUT WHAT MATTERS IS SATISFYING THE DISPARATE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED THEN FAIRNESS APPLIES, IF NO CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO APPEASING INTERESTED PARTIES, ONLY CORRECTNESS THEN FAIRNESS DOES NOT APPLY.
What the Buddha says concurs with Jesus:
Jesus said even the man who calls his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell just the Buddha said that a trifling evil done by someone of little merit can send him to hell whilst the same is experienced as a trifling suffering if he has much merit.
"There is the case where a trifling evil deed done takes one to hell. The very same trifling deed done by another is experienced in the here & now, and barely appears for a moment.
" There is the case where a person is undeveloped in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: restricted, small-hearted. A trifling evil deed takes him to hell.
" There is the case where a certain individual is developed in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted. A trifling evil deed is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment.
Fairness is the wrong reason for action:
Fairness is about taking the interests of the parties involved into consideration.
You should not take into consideration the interests of the parties involved, that is the path to difficulty and falsity; what you should do is understand the nature of the problem at hand and thus understanding you know the correct action required.
FAIRNESS IS ABOUT TAKING THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES AS A CONSIDERATION IN DECIDING WHEN TRUE DECIDING SHOULD BE SHORN OF CONSIDERATIONS OF PARTIES INVOLVED BUT WHAT THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS.
It is about correctness not fairness:
Whatever the situation or decision, what matters is the correctness never the fairness, never the pandering to disparate interests.
YOU SHOULD NEVER ALLOW FAIRNESS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN MAKING A DECISION, WHAT MATTERS IS THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ACTION, WHETHER IT RESOLVES THE PROBLEM.
IF YOU THINK YOU SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION FAIRNESS WHEN MAKING A DECISION THEN YOU MAY BE CORRECT AND GOOD AS YOU THINK OR YOU MAY BE DELUDED.
This is intrinsically a very unfair world:
Spit at a noble one and it can be very expensive because you can burn in hell even for many eternities, the Buddha said the person who developed a mind of ill will towards his deputies was destined to boil in the deepest hells for many eternities.
If a noble one burns you, you may live to regret eternally your transgression.
YOU CANNOT BURN A NOBLE ONE BUT A NOBLE ONE CAN BURN YOU TERRIBLY. IS THAT FAIR OR UNFAIR, WHO DO YOU WANT TO ARGUE WITH? THAT IS THE WAY THINGS ARE AND YOU BETTER TAKE NOTICE.
If you seek and enjoy special rights in some areas, it is hypocrisy, delusion to speak of fairness in other areas because if you truly practiced fairness you will renounce all special rights.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO ACCEPT AND ENJOY SPECIAL RIGHTS (EG BY RACE OR CLASS) AND THEN TALK ABOUT FAIRNESS IN DEALINGS OR MORALS OR WHATEVER BECAUSE YOU YOURSELF DO NOT PRACTICE FAIRNESS, WHAT RIGHT HAVE YOU GOT TO SPEAK ABOUT FAIRNESS?
FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY DOES NOT EXISTS, IT IS A DELUDED FABRICATION OF CONVENIENCE OF HUMANS TO APPLY WHERE IT SUITS THEM, IT IS NOT A TRUE BASIS FOR ACTION BUT A FALSE BASIS BASED ON THE RIGHTS AND DEMANDS OF INVOLVED PARTIES. ALTHOUGH HUMANS PREACH FAIRNESS, A CONCOCTION BY THEM, THEY NEVER PRACTICE FAIRNESS, THEY WOULD LIKE SPECIAL TREATMENT, FAVOURS AND PRIVILEGES, THEY DEMAND FAIRNESS FROM OTHERS BUT IF THEY CAN GET FAVOURS OR SPECIAL RIGHTS THAT WOULD BE GREAT, PREFERRED AND ONCE YOU ENJOY SPECIAL RIGHTS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION THAT YOU CAN BE FAIR IN YOUR DEALINGS.
SO LONG AS YOU ENJOY AND ACCEPT SPECIAL RIGHTS YOU DISQUALIFY YOURSELF IN PREACHING FAIRNESS IN ANY ASPECT.
THE TRULY NOBLE MAKE NO DEMANDS OR RIGHTS OF OTHERS, IF THEY GET ALMSFOOD FROM YOU THAT IS FINE, IF THEY DON’T GET, THAT TOO IS FINE, THEY ARE NOT HURT OR ANGRY, WHERE THE NEED TO BE FAIR TO THEM?
IF A BEING HAS NO DEMANDS AND NO GREED, FAIRNESS DOES NOT APPLY, IT IS ONLY WHEN A BEING IS DEMANDING, GREEDY THAT FAIRNESS COMES INTO PLAY AND NO MATTER HOW THEY TALK AND DEFINE FAIRNESS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE THEIR DEMANDING THAT CLASHES WITH OTHERS, THEIR INSATIABLE GREED WILL RENDER ANY TALK OF FAIRNESS MERE HYPOCRISY, NOT PRACTICING WHAT YOU PREACH.
If the person is unfair you are a fool upholding fairness for him:
Before you demand or advocate fairness for anybody, make sure he himself is a fair person, if he is not fair, he has no right expecting and receiving fairness from others.
If you advocate fairness for someone who does not deserve then rather than meritorious, you are creating karma to be experienced as future suffering. He is getting his just desserts when others are unfair in turn to him.
Thus if someone routinely tells lies and slanders others, he is getting a taste of his own medicine and should not complain if others also tell lies and slander him.
LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP, YOU MAY END IN THE DITCH OF HELL. FAIRNESS IS FOR THOSE WHO ARE FAIR, IF YOU ARE UNFAIR YOU HAVE NO RIGHT EXPECTING OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO YOU. JESUS SAID FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NOT, ALL WILL BE TAKEN FROM HIM AND HE WILL HAVE NOTHING, FOR THOSE WHO HAVE, MUCH MORE WILL BE GIVEN AND HE WILL HAVE PLENTY, WHAT IS SO FAIR ABOUT THAT?
Sleep is a descent to death, meditation is ascent into eternal life:
In keeping with their delusion far more widespread than they realize, people worship sleep, seek a good night’s sleep when the very same sleep they worship is listed as one of the five hindrances or obstructions by the Buddha (ill will, doubt and uncertainty, greed and restlessness, laziness and sleepiness) that detains a being in continual death and suffering when there is a heaven with eternal life without suffering.
WHEN A PERSON SLEEPS HE IS DESCENDING IN CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE DEPTHS OF DEATH AND SUFFERING.
WHEN A PERSON MEDITATES, HE IS ASCENDING IN ALERTNESS, CONSCIOUSNESS PROGRESSING INCREASINGLY HIGHER FROM SERENITY OF MIND WITH DISCURSIVE THINKING (FIRST HIGHER STATE) TO FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF THINKING (SECOND HIGHER STATE), THEN NEITHER STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE (THIRD) TO FINALLY NEITHER EXPERIENCING PAIN NOR PLEASURE WHICH ARE PRODUCTS OF CONTACT WITH FORCE (FOURTH HIGHER STATE).
RATHER THAN SLEEP, THE HIGHER A PERSON ASCENDS IN THE STATES OF MIND, THE MORE ALERT HE IS AND HE IS HEADED FOR 1, 2, 4 AND EVEN 500 ETERNITIES WITHOUT DEATH AND SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO THINKS MEDITATION IS SLEEPING HAS WRONG VIEW.
SLEEPING IS NOT GOOD BUT DESCENDING INTO DEATH AND THE PERSON WHO IS NOBLE REQUIRES VERY LITTLE SLEEP.
AGAIN DREAMING WHATEVER IT IS, DAY OR NIGHT DREAMING IS NOT GOOD BUT BAD, ONCE THE BUDDHA IS ENLIGHTENED HE DOES NOT DREAM, HE ENTERTAINS NO DREAMS OR PRIVATE REALITIES ANYMORE.
Fireworks caused fatal crash:
A firework display near the site of the crash which killed seven people on the M5 is the "major line of inquiry", police say.
It seems a rugby club adjacent to a highway set off fireworks creating a pall of black smoke that drifted across the highway suddenly blinding motorists causing the crash.
THERE IS NEVER ANY JUSTIFICATION TO CELEBRATE, TO LET OFF FIREWORKS WHICH ARE MEANINGLESS AND WASTE MONEY AND SHOULD YOUR FIREWORKS CAUSE GRIEF, SUFFERING (NOISE) AND DEATH, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT KNOW, YOU HAVE SUFFERING DUE IN REPAYMENT FOR YOUR HARM YOU DID TO OTHERS.
THUS ANYONE WHO SETS OFF FIREWORKS IS CREATING DEADLY KARMA FOR HIMSELF, INDULGING IN CONTROLLED INSANITY BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS SETTING OFF FIREWORKS, NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS MADE UP TO BE. I AM NOT IMPRESSED WHATEVER THE FIREWORKS EG OLYMPICS BECAUSE MY MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY WHAT IS SEEN.
Brinksmanship:
Daily all emotional stylish people are practicing brinksmanship with themselves. They subject themselves to stress and tension from self and others and only pull back sometimes earlier sometimes very late when things get too unbearable, too hot. It is like the person who allows a noose to be placed around his neck and only pulls it loose when it gets too tight or the person who only pulls his fingers off the board when the chopper gets too close.
Because they are constantly exposing themselves to deadly suffering and only pulling back at the brink, they are conditioning themselves ever more compelling in the death wish, to consummate such wilful self harm, to finally go all the way to destroy or kill oneself and one day they finally will.
ANYONE WHO WILLFULLY EXPOSES HIMSELF TO STRESS GENERATED BY SELF OR OTHERS IS PRACTICING BRINKSMANSHIP LIKE THE MAN WHO POINTS A LOADED GUN AT HIS TEMPLE AND MASSAGES THE TRIGGER, ONE DAY HE WILL PULLED THE TRIGGER ON HIMSELF AND CONSUMMATE HIS DEATH WISH.
Kamal Ahmed
Sadly, a Robin Hood tax won't help the poor
If sadness has nothing to do with matters, it is just a meaningless useless stirring of mental force to prolong that achieves no useful work let alone meaning then he is practicing controlled insanity and advocating controlled insanity in others talking about sadness.
The motive may be condescending, to pour cold water or scoff, siding with rich, trying to dismiss something with what may be flawed logic.
IF IT IS TOTALLY NO USE STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO BE SAD AND YOU BRING SADNESS IN, YOU ARE A FOOL INDULGING IN CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ADVOCATING THE SAME WITH DEADLY KARMA FOR SAYING SO.
Have you changed in style or substance?
People say they have changed but what and how have they changed?
There is cosmetic and true change, there is style change and substance change.
For those who are discerning everyone changed after 1977 because a mandatory consciousness change swept around the world triggered by an unprecedented change in someone (me) and there have been changes after 1997 that are still on going.
But most of the changes in the behaviour and demeanour of people are merely changes of style not substance, cosmetic rather than true changes.
ONLY A PERSON WHO HAS CHANGED TO SHED HIS STYLE, WHO CEASES TO STRETCH HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH HAS TRULY, MEANINGFULLY CHANGED AND HE IS HEADING EVEN FOR ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN BLISS. THE REST ARE RUNNING ROUND IN CIRCLES, KIDDING THEMSELVES THEY HAVE CHANGED, THEY ARE UNREPENTANT, THOROUGHLY DELUDED, CHANGING IN STYLE TO REFLECT CHANGES ALL AROUND, STILL CLUELESS AND HEADED FOR AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE SLAUGHTER.
ANY CHANGES THAT ONLY MODIFY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS COSMETIC CHANGE NOT TRUE CHANGE, ONLY CHANGE FROM STRETCHING TO NOT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS TRUE SUBSTANCE CHANGE.
My first miracle:
Whether there was a global consciousness after 1977 is not subjective to dispute by anyone, it either did happen or did not happen and if it did happen and you are not sure or you think it did not happen then you have a muddled mind which is the way to future woe not safety.
TO ONE SEEING CORRECTLY THERE WAS AN UNPRECEDENTED, UNTHINKABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT BENEFITED EVERYONE IN THAT IT LIFTED EVERYONE’S INVISIBLE OPPRESSIVE CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THUS ALLEVIATING THEIR EVER PRESENT SUFFERING AS IF A LOW CEILING WAS CAUSED TO BE LIFTED ENABLING PEOPLE TO STAND UP FOR THE FIRST TIME WHERE IN THE PAST THEY WERE FORCED TO PERMANENTLY CROUCH.
THIS IS MY FIRST MIRACLE BECAUSE I WAS THE PERSON WHO TRIGGERED THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT ALTHOUGH IT AFFECTED EVERYONE, NO ONE BOTHERED TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ASK WHY BUT THEY ACTED AS IF NOTHING HAS CHANGED, TO THEM IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT STEVE JOBS CHANGED THE WORLD.
AS JESUS SAID, NOTHING CAN HAPPEN WITHOUT THE FATHER OR GOD’S KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL AND SO THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 MUST HAVE GOD’S WILL.
SUBSEQUENTLY IN RECENT YEARS STARTING IN 1997 THERE HAVE BEEN FURTHER CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES SWEEPING AROUND THE WORLD.
I (AND NOT THE BEATLES OR STEVE JOBS) TRULY CHANGED THE WORLD IN UNPRECEDENTED UNTHINKABLE WAYS THAT WERE MEANINGFUL, ALLEVIATED THE SUFFERINGS OF BEINGS HERE.
Williams apologises in person for racist comment - Woods
To deluded people in this world, this is the end of matters but in the divine scheme of things this is not so.
After apologizing he must ask for forgiveness, if Woods forgives him then the matter is settled, if Woods does not forgive him, then suffering is due in repayment.
I think Williams talked of sticking something up Tiger’s black asshole.
PEOPLE ARE CAVALIER, THINK NOTHING OF THE BRASH ILL CONCEIVED STATEMENTS THEY MADE, THINK IT IS OK OFF THE RECORD, THE PERSON WHO PUBLICIZED THE COMMENT HAS GRAVE KARMA (DIVIDING PEOPLE), EVEN SPOKEN OFF RECORD THERE IS GRAVE KARMA (YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE) AND AFTERWARDS THEY ARE TOO PROUD TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS NOT REALIZING THEY ARE LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT UNTIL THE OTHER PARTY FORGIVES THEM.
SO IF YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR YOU, AVOID DOING AND SAYING THINGS THAT YOU MUST ASK FOR FORGIVENESS BECAUSE IF YOU DO NOT ASK AND IT IS NOT FORGIVEN, PAYMENT IN SUFFERING IS DUE.
Not racist?
In the aftermath, many have defended Williams saying he is not a racist. He may behave publicly as not a racist but he may be a closet racist.
What has blackness got to do with Tiger’s asshole?
IF YOU THINK IT IS COINCIDENTAL THAT HE SPOKE OF THE HOLE BEING BLACK, HE IS NEVERTHELESS NOT A RACIST, YOU ARE DELUDED.
HE MAY PUBLICLY APPEAR NOT A RACIST BUT HE IS A CLOSET RACIST, A HYPOCRITE LIKE THE VAST MAJORITY. THEY MAY SMILE AT YOU BUT INSIDE THEY THINK YOU ARE SHIT.
THE OUTBURST REFLECTS HIS TRUE NATURE, WHAT HE PROJECTS PUBLICLY IS A SHOW, HYPOCRISY AND THE VAST MAJORITY IN THIS WORLD ARE HYPOCRITES, THEY NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN, NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION THEY DO.
Forgiveness in Buddhism and Christianity:
Jesus said if you do not forgive others their trespasses your Father in heaven will also not forgive you your trespasses on others. Until something is forgiven, the offence stands and payment in suffering is due. Thus when a deluded monk accused Sariputta, the Buddha’s deputy of slighting him, ignoring him, the Buddha asked Sariputta to forgive the repentant monk, lest his head be split into seven pieces.
Below, Sariputta asked the Buddha for forgiveness even when his conduct is impeccable.
"If any deed or word of mine did not please you, O Lord, may the Blessed One forgive me! It is now time for me to go." (Sariputta is saying his final goodbye to the Buddha)
Now once before, the Buddha had answered this, when he said: "There is nothing, be it in deeds or words, wherein I should have to reproach you, Sariputta. For you are learned, Sariputta, of great wisdom, of broad and bright, quick, keen and penetrative wisdom."
So now he made answer in the same way: "I forgive you, Sariputta," he said. "But there was not a single word or deed of yours that was displeasing to me. Do now, Sariputta, what you think timely."
You call this true friendship?
Although Williams had been caddie to Tiger Woods for a long time, there may be bad blood between them as a result of his being sacked as caddie or there may be grievances about severance compensations.
Many appear and sound as if they are your great undying friends; that is so long as you do not cross them or their self interests are not harmed, if you trespass they can even become your sworn enemy and they will kill you.
THIS IS HYPOCRITICAL FRIENDSHIP BUILT ON EMOTION, ATTRACTION NOT GENUINE REASON OR LOVE. THEIR FRIENDSHIP IS DEPENDENT ON YOU PLEASING THEM AND NOT HARMING THEIR SELF INTERESTS. THIS IS THE PERVASIVE TYPE OF HYPOCRITICAL RELATIONSHIP IN THIS WORLD. THE WISE DO NOT DELUDE THEMSELVES AND THEY CAN DISCERN SUCH FRIENDSHIPS WHEREVER THEY ARE AND THEY DO NOT PARTAKE OF SUCH ‘FRIENDSHIPS’ OF CONVENIENCE AND MATERIAL GAINS.
A nonracist making racist comment:
Driven irresistibly by stirred emotion, Williams speaks of a black asshole. That is definitely a racist comment but even Tiger Woods says Williams is not a racist.
So what is the truth of the matter?
The truth of the matter is that people have no true understanding, they perceive falsely that although the comment is clearly racist, the person is nevertheless not racist. What is the big deal about being a racist?
It is because people in this world today make a big deal about being a racist, it is not ‘politically correct’ or taboo to be racist that they avoid the label, they have serious false perception that someone can say something racist and yet not be racist or there is intense urge to deny, to refuse to accept as true what is true.
DENIAL AND THE URGE TO DENY IS INTENSE IN THIS WORLD WHICH IS WHY THEY CAN SAY SOMEONE IS NOT RACIST WHEN THE STATEMENT IS RACIST, THEY BLAME A SLIP OF THE TONGUE, GIVE AN EXCUSE THAT HE WAS ONLY JOKING OR IT WAS A BAD TASTING JOKE. FURTHER THEY DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, THEY FALSELY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU CAN UTTER A RACIST COMMENT AND YET NOT BE RACIST. RACISM IS TABOO, DENIED AND THEY PRETEND THEY ARE NOT RACIST WHEN THEY ALL ARE. BLACKS ARE RACISTS TOO BUT THEY BLAME THEIR RACISM ON WHITES.
YOU MAY BE RIGHT THAT BLACK ASSHOLE IS NOT RACIST AND YOU CAN MAKE A RACIST COMMENT AND YET NOT BE RACIST BUT IF THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO PERCEIVE FALSELY THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION AND THAT IS ALWAYS TORMENTING.
If it was not racist, why the fuss?
If the comment was not perceived as racist, why was such a fuss kicked up that Williams had to personally apologize and Woods spoke about the matter?
THUS CLEARLY THE COMMENTS ARE WIDELY PERCEIVED AS RACIST AND SO EITHER THEY ALL HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION, ARE BEING OVERSENSITIVE OR IT IS TRULY RACIST.
IF THE COMMENT IS RACIST, THEN ALL THE TWISTED ARGUMENTS ARE SAYING ALTHOUGH IT WAS RACIST, IT WAS A MOMENT’S INSANITY OR SOME EXCUSE, WILLIAMS IS NOT RACIST. WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL ABOUT BEING RACIST? IF YOU ARE RACIST AND YOU DENY IT, YOU ARE HEADING FOR INSANITY TELLING YOURSELF WHAT IS TRUE (YOU ARE RACIST) IS NOT TRUE.
What is stress?
If there is such an entity called stress then its nature can be made known.
There is evidence that heavenly beings also wield force, a heavenly being with flaming club was ready to split Ambatta’s head into seven pieces if he did not answer the Buddha’s question at the third prompting and when the Buddha conquered a demon’s fire with his own fire, there was no suggestion the Buddha was exhausted or stressed afterwards.
So what is the difference or nature of force usage in this world that renders it stressful whilst force use by divine beings appears not associated with stress?
IT IS THE RESISTED OR OPPOSITE FORCE CLASHING USAGE OF FORCE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRESS, STRESS IS THE UNPLEASANT SEIZING OR JAMMING EXPERIENCE THAT TAKES TIME TO DISSIPATE CAUSED BY THE SELF RESISTED USAGE OF FORCE.
WHENEVER A PERSON WILLFULLY SAYS OR DOES SOMETHING HE KNOWS IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, HE SAYS OR DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL (EG BY APING OTHERS), HE DOES SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW (EG STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS), HE DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING (EG STRETCHING SYLLABLES WITHOUT AWARENESS), HE MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE THAT MUST BE OVERCOME AND DOGS THAT ACTION IN ITS ENTIRETY.
THUS STRESS IS THE UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE THAT IS THE RESULT OF SELF RESISTED FORCE USE TO DO OR SAY THINGS THE BEING KNOWS IS FALSE, DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, IS UNAWARE HE IS DOING OR THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW (EG FASHIONING STYLE). THIS RESISTED FORCE USE WHEN PROLONGED BECOMES JAMMED OR GRIDLOCKED AND TAKES TIME TO DISSIPATE.
EVERYTHING BEINGS HERE DO MUST BE SUBJECTED TO SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT ARE TOTALLY MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW AND THEY ARE REHASHING EVERYTHING WHICH MEANS THEY ARE FAKING IT OR FALSIFYING THAT MUST AROUSE SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS, NEVER TRULY FITS THE OCCASION.
Stress is mandatory:
It does not matter how stupid or intelligent the person is, how wicked or unrepentant or tough he is, so long as a person uses force against self-resistance he must experience stress that accumulates the longer he uses force against resistance or friction until it becomes jammed, seizes him and takes time to dissipate and each time he stresses himself he not only suffers but trains himself to better stress himself so that stress rises faster and harder to control and he is headed for insane stress.
IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW CLEVER OR CLUELESS YOU ARE, HOW TOUGH OR UNREPENTENT YOU ARE, SO LONG AS YOU USE FORCE AGAINST SELF RESISTANCE YOU MUST GENERATE STRESS.
AND WHOEVER DOES OR SAYS THINGS HE KNOWS IS FALSE, DOES NOT KNOW IS TRUE (COPY OTHERS), DOES SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS FOR SHOW (STRETCH SYLLABLES, DANCE, PLAYS FOOTBALL), DOES SOMETHING AUTOMATICALLY BY REHASH WITHOUT KNOWING HE IS DOING, HE MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS TO DO THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING.
What is restlessness?
Restlessness is the mandatory affliction of all emotional stylish people and it is only possible to be restless if you do or say things by rote and there are copies of whatever you say or do in a mental jukebox that your mental force that you have so well trained to stir without true purpose can seize and attempt to activate against your wishes and that is always tormenting.
IF YOU DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR MEANINGLESS (EG DANCE OR STRETCH SYLLABLES FOR SHOW), OR YOU STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE WITHOUT DOING MEANINGFUL WORK (EG STIR TO LIKE, DISLIKE, FEEL SAD OR AGITATED), YOU ARE TRAINING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE FOR NO VALID REASON AND THUS STIRRED SENSELESSLY, THE MENTAL FORCE WILL SEEK AND SEIZE RECORDINGS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX TO ACTIVATE THEM INAPPROPRIATELY.
Two indispensable requisites of restlessness:
There are two indispensable requisites for restlessness:
Once a person’s mental force has been well trained to activate for no true purpose or aimlessly it will activate by itself and it will seek from the vast repertoire of recordings to say or do things that the person struggles to control or suppress and he is headed for mad violent restlessness.
Cat walks 2000 miles back to old house:
This cat apparently walked 2000 miles back to her old home to be reunited with her old friends after her owners took her with them to their new home in NT Australia.
Beings have attachment to their friends and house and rather than amazing, it is suffering and dangerous.
The Buddha is homeless and there is no place he calls home that he wants to return to. As long as there is attachment that is suffering.
That's one long walkabout! Cat walks 2,000 miles across Australia to get home after owners relocate
By Jessica Satherley
Last updated at 5:40 PM on 7th November 2011
This brave cat is believed to have walked almost 2,000 miles across Australia to get back home.
Jessie the cat relocated with her owners from South Australia to a new home in the Northern Territory in March last year.
But soon after the family’s move, Jessie went missing and is thought to have showed up at their old home over a year later.
Cat on a mission: Jessie the cat (pictured) is thought to have walked 2,000 miles through the Australian desert
‘She was here for a couple of weeks and we thought she’d settled in, but soon afterwards Jessie disappeared’, her owner Sheree Gale, 31, told Northern Territory News.
But Sheree is convinced her determined tabby left Berry Springs, just outside Darwin, and walked the distance back to her old home in Ungarra, on the Eyre Peninsula.
More...
'I can’t explain it. She hates getting into cars, so I think she has walked,' said Mrs Gale.
More than a year later, the new residents of the Gale’s old home in Ungarra, South Australia, found a strange cat hanging around.
Gone walkabout: Jessie the cat is thought to have walked across Australia, from Darwin to Ungarra
'I took a photo and sent it to Sheree, and she said it was definitely Jessie,' said Jenn Humby, who, for now, is looking after Jessie.
If the cat is Jessie, she would have either endured Australia’s harsh desert or travelled via the coastal route, which would have taken even longer.
When Mrs Gale and her husband, Andre, flew up to Berry Springs, along with Jessie, they had left their other two cats behind with the owners of their old home.
The Gales believe the cats are all reunited now and are happy for Jessie to stay at their old home.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058630/Cat-walks-2-000-miles-Australia-home-owners-relocate.html#ixzz1d7NIvqBm
You should be good never fair:
Anyone speaking of fairness instead of goodness is guilty of advocating falsity, advocating being calculating that the Buddha said is the path to woe.
True goodness has no consideration of calculating, fairness is about competing interests, balancing your interest or greed against mine and so it is evil not good.
Goodness is independent of any other person or being, has no consideration of others’ interests or rights against mine.
And what is goodness?
As the Buddha said, it is not taking what is not given, not killing or harming, not telling lies, not speaking idly, divisive speech, not taking intoxicants, even no sex or illicit sex.
THUS ANYONE WHO TELLS OTHERS LET’S BE FAIR, YOU MUST BE FAIR IS NOT HEAPING MERIT BUT KARMA ON HIMSELF, IS MISGUIDING OTHERS BECAUSE HE IS TEACHING OTHERS TO BALANCE SELF INTEREST AGAINST OTHERS’ INTERESTS. SPEAKING RIGHTLY ONE SAYS ‘LET US BE GOOD’, YOU MUST BE GOOD.
FAIRNESS IS ONE THING, GOODNESS IS ANOTHER THING AND THEY CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED AS SUCH AND SUCH. IT IS NOT GOOD TO BE FAIR BUT EVIL, ONLY GOOD IS GOOD. FAIRNESS IS BEING CALCULATING AND CALCULATING IS BAD AND PROGRAMMING.
Evidence again of mankind’s no true understanding:
It does not take supernatural powers but it requires discernment, seeing things as it actually is or true understanding to define that fairness is about balancing contending interests, it is about being calculating and so it is bad, evil, selfish rather than good as preached by mankind.
Goodness on the hand has no consideration of self or other interests and so it is truly good, meritorious.
THE FACT THAT MANKIND ADVOCATES FAIRNESS AND THINKS THAT IT IS GOOD IS EVIDENCE OF MANKIND’S WRONG OR PERVERTED UNDERSTANDING THAT IS PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED OTHERWISE THEY CANNOT CONSISTENTLY PERCEIVE FAIRNESS AS VIRTUOUS, TO BE PRACTICED WHEN IT IS ABOUT BEING CALCULATING, BALANCING SELF AND OTHER INTERESTS AND BAD.
Sarkozy called Israeli PM 'liar'
French President Nicolas Sarkozy called Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu a "liar" in remarks to US President Barack Obama overheard by journalists.
Of course he is a liar (and so is Sarkozy) and it reflects the intense pretense of mankind that they behave as if he is not a liar and they get angry when others call them liars.
IF YOU ARE A LIAR YOU HAVE NO RECOURSE TO GET ANGRY OR UPSET WHEN SOMEONE CALLS YOU A LIAR. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE IS NOT A LIAR EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION.
WHENEVER A PERSON LIES, HE HAS TO SEVER OR CUT HIS CONNECTION WITH TRUTH AND IN TIME HIS CONNECTION IS PERMANENTLY CUT AND SO ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS CUTTING OFF HIS CONNECTION WITH TRUTH AND SO IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME, THEIR TIES WITH TRUTH ARE PERMANENTLY SEVERED AND THEY ARE LIARS, WHAT THEY DISH OUT IS NEVER THE TRUTH BUT STALE THE SAME OLD REHEATED PRE-COOKED FOOD.
Joe Frazier loses fight with cancer
Just because he is a fighter and he died of cancer does not mean he lost his fight against cancer.
The truth of the matter is Frazier dies of cancer. Without knowing he fought and lost against cancer you are speaking without knowing that must arouse self resistance and stress.
WITHOUT FABRICATING HE CANNOT COME UP WITH THIS ‘CLEVER’ OR WITTY STATEMENT AND BECAUSE HE CANNOT BE SPEAKING KNOWING WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE, HE MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THENCE STRESS AND CONFLICT SAYING SO.
You’re paying taxes, so why aren’t energy companies?
The fact that you are paying tax has nothing to do with energy companies not paying taxes and it is a deadly false association that he is cultivating with the purpose of stirring readers’ emotions to become interested and even angry. People think what they say is full of sense and readers see nothing wrong, but his intention is to stir, to be divisive and that has karma.
If a person has recorded understandings that he rehashes to explain a situation he must experience resistance because that understanding is a fake, not specific for the occasion but it is a generalized understanding that at best approximately explains the situation. Only a person who truly understands a situation as it actually specifically is, is not stirred to resist.
Why is it that rehashed understandings, false understanding and failure to understand stirs resistance?
UNDERSTANDING IS AN ACTION DONE BY A BEING AND IF HE DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING HE IS DOING IT, HE DOES SOMETHING HE KNOWS IS FALSE OR WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE, HE MUST STIR RESISTANCE. THUS IF HE UNDERSTANDS FALSELY BY REHASH, HE FALSELY UNDERSTANDS SOMETHING OR HE FAILS TO UNDERSTAND SOMETHING WHEN IT IS POSSIBLE TO UNDERSTAND, HE MUST EXPERIENCE RESISTANCE OR DISTURBANCE OF HIS MIND.
Understanding is an action of a being:
Understanding is an action of a being just as speaking and doing things eg dancing, playing football or golf is an action.
And so in common with all deeds and speech, if you understand falsely by rehash, understand falsely, failed to understand when it is possible to understand you must experience self-resistance, conflict and thus suffer.
What is understanding?
Understanding is a mental picture usually in words or transcribed into words formulated (an action) by the person based on what the being sees or hears that may be accurate, as it actually is the case or it is inaccurate, very different from what has happened or it is rehashed, there is a standard recording in his mental jukebox that he has retrieved to paste on to explain the current event.
UNDERSTANDING IS A FORMULATION OR COMPOSITION USUALLY IN WORDS OR IMAGES DONE BY A BEING THAT EITHER TRULY OR INACCURATELY EXPLAINS WHAT HAS HAPPENED, IT CAN BE FRESHLY COMPOSED OR BE A REHASH OF A PRE-EXISTING RECORDING.
Perceiving and not perceiving are also actions:
Just as understanding, sweeping the floor and speaking are actions done by a being, perceiving and not perceiving are also actions done by a being.
You can perceive live specifically or you can perceive according to a program in your mental jukebox that tells you what and how to see, to look out for certain things (eg pretty girls or things to steal or of value) and avoid seeing certain things (eg ugly things). Once you have focussed your faculty of sight on something, some scene, you must also lose your focus or attention on all other simultaneous sights that are available for perception. The process of perceiving compels or forces you to also not perceive the infinitude of simultaneous other things happening at the same time, if you did not perceive you will also not not-perceive.
PERCEIVING IS AN ACTION SEPARATE FROM UNDERSTANDING THAT A BEING UNDERTAKES. AND JUST AS HE CAN UNDERSTAND WRONGLY OR FAIL TO UNDERSTAND, HE CAN PERCEIVE FALSELY (EG FEEL SOMEONE TOUCH HIM WHEN THERE IS NOTHING) OR HE FAILS TO PERCEIVE WHAT IS IN FRONT OF HIM.
THE BUDDHA SAYS THERE IS THE HIGHEST REALM WHEREIN THE BEING NEITHER PERCEIVES NOR DOES HE NOT PERCEIVE WHERE HE SEES AND KNOWS EVERYTHING, THERE IS NOTHING HE DOES NOT KNOW AND SO THE VERY ACT, DEED OF SEEING COMPELS YOU TO NOT SEE THE MULTITUDE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AT THE SAME TIME.
THERE IS WHAT IS HAPPENING AND THERE IS WHAT IS PERCEIVED BY A BEING, THESE TWO ARE DIFFERENT THINGS AND PERCEIVING IS A (RESTRICTIVE) ACTION UNDERTAKEN BY A BEING.
Malaysian GST humbug:
Quote: But Mr Idris also said that although the population was 28 million currently, only one per cent of the population paid income tax. His suggestion: implement a goods and services tax (GST). This, he said, would also help make the country globally competitive as 140 other countries had implemented a similar tax.
Rather than making the nation competitive, the GST may dampen demand and crimp the economy more.
Buying binoculars 10 times the market rate is considered not corrupt, it is the profligate spending, the many overseas trips and lavish spending on unnecessary things that will bring the country to its knees if it hasn’t already. Apparently Penang had significant budget surpluses every year under DAP where it was deficits before. Thus cut off the corruption and there will be much more savings.
HE IS TRYING TO SELL GST BUT HIS LOGIC IS FALSE THAT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES FOR HIM. YES THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS GST BECAUSE IT IS RUNNING OUT OF REVENUE TO FUND ITS PROFLIGACY BUT IT WON’T COME CLEAN AND SO IT MUST SELL THE TAX TO THE PUBLIC.
The perverted argument for GST:
It is said GST will make the country globally competitive and it is intrinsically fair, it will only tax those who spend, not those who do not spend and so if you do not want to be taxed don’t spend.
If people don’t spend, how is it going to stimulate the economy and so if the tax encourages people not to spend it will dampen not boost the economy. Further for services that are essential, that the poor have to use (eg see doctors, buy petrol), they would be taxed where previously they weren’t and so it is impossible for them not to spend and because they have no choice but to spend on services and goods they need, they will be taxed where previously they were not.
YES, THE GOVT NEEDS TO RAISE MORE REVENUE BECAUSE IT CANNOT MAKE ENDS MEET BUT STOP TALKING HUMBUG ABOUT BOOSTING THE ECONOMY AND COMPETITIVENESS AND IT BEING FAIR, ONLY TAXING THOSE WHO SPEND.
Understanding the Greek & European debt crisis:
UK and the US too faced the ‘barrel of the gun’ of massive debts but they have temporarily skirted or postponed their problem by indulging in what is euphemistically called ‘quantitative easing’, printing of massive amount of paper and electronic money to cover their debts that is a form of cheating because this money is not from savings or reserves they have but printed without any backing.
Greece too have big debts that are coming due that it cannot pay and so have countries like Italy, Spain and Portugal whose debts are apparently even much bigger than Greece’s.
The problem with Greece is that it does not have its own currency that it can debase by quantitative easing to repay creditors but it is using the euro that is jointly owned by many countries including Germany which has big savings (in theory because it may be lent out and gone) and whose people are big savers and don’t like the euro thrashed by indiscriminate printing and so reluctantly they have hashed a deal in which Greece will pay half its debt using money lent by the EU’s established $1 trillion bailout fund and to soften the blow, they have recruited countries like China who holds big amounts of euro to lend to the fund for use in bailouts.
The (desperate) need to bail out Greece and looming defaults by Italy, Spain and Portugal is that there are derivative pay outs due should they be ruled to have defaulted (paying half the debt may technically averted a full default); if there was a default and there be a failure to pay out there might be catastrophic reverberations shaking the multi-trillion derivative industry.
UK shrewdly exited the ERM many years ago because its spendthrift, indebting way was incompatible with the ways of the fiscally disciplined, savings loving export juggernaut ERM giant, Germany, to join the euro would mean surrendering to a common currency that it could not manipulate because it did not own it.
The appeal for countries like Greece and Spain in joining the euro is that they will be joining a strong currency that enabled them to borrow LARGE amounts at low costs but they have spent their borrowings on useless things that will not contribute in future income to repay the debts. There was a common delusion that such borrowings would be spent to improve the countries and thus improved they would repay their debts ‘with their hands down’ or plenty to spare but it turned out the opposite, they have splurged their borrowings away on things that will not assist them to repay.
THUS THE REALITY MAY BE THAT THE SAVINGS THAT GERMANY AND CHINA (MAJOR EURO TRADING PARTNER) EARNED MAY BE LARGELY WORTHLESS BECAUSE THEY WERE BASED ON SELLING TO CUSTOMERS (LIKE GREECE) WHO BOUGHT USING BORROWED MONEY THAT THEY CANNOT NOW RETURN OR THEY COULD NOT AFFORD IT AND FURTHER, THE SAVINGS OF GERMANY AND CHINA MAY BE IN NAME ONLY BECAUSE THESE SAVINGS WERE LENT OUT RECKLESSLY IN SEARCH OF PROFIT AND MAY NOW BE ALSO LOST BECAUSE BORROWERS CANNOT REPAY OR WILL REPAY WITH UNBACKED PRINTED PAPER.
THE DELUSION OF THE PAST WAS THAT ALL THESE INDEBTED COUNTRIES LIKE GREECE WOULD BORROW THE MONEY AND DEVELOP THEMSELVES AND THUS DEVELOPED THEY WOULD REPAY WHAT THEY BORROWED WITH PLENTY TO SPARE AND BECOME MATURE ECONOMIES TO BOOT BUT IT TURNS OUT THEY HAVE SQUANDERED WHAT THEY BORROWED AND NOW THEY HAVE MASSIVE UNEMPLOYMENT (SPAIN’S UNEMPLOYMENT IS MORE THAN 20%) AND CANNOT REPAY DEBTS THAT ARE COMING DUE AND EVEN IF THEY CAN REPAY, IT WOULD GO TO WHITTLING DOWN THE DEBTS ONLY, NOT GOODS FOR THE PEOPLE. IF GREECE WERE TO DEFAULT IT WOULD TRIGGER DERIVATIVE PAY-OUTS THAT MAY NOT BE HONOURED AND THIS MAY HAVE DEVASTATING REVERBERATIONS IN THE MULTI-TRILLION DERIVATIVE MARKET. GREECE CANNOT PRINT MONEY AT WILL TO REPAY BECAUSE IT DOES NOT OWN THE EURO AND SO IT NEEDS THE BAIL OUT FROM A RELUCTANT SAVINGS LOVING, EXPORTING JUGGERNAUT GERMANY TO DO AND MUCH AGAINST ITS WILL, THEY HAVE COBBLED A FUND OF 1 TRILLION (THAT WILL NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO BAIL OUT ITALY, SPAIN AND PORTUGAL) WITH AN AGREEMENT FOR CHINA TO CONTRIBUTE FROM ITS HOARD OF EUROS AND CREDITORS RECEIVING A 50% HAIRCUT THAT WOULD TECHNICALLY AVERT A TOTAL DEFAULT TRIGGERING PAY OUT.
BUT GERMANY AND CHINA’S SAVINGS MAY BE ILLUSORY IN TWO WAYS, BECAUSE BORROWERS USING THE MONEY TO BUY GERMAN AND CHINESE GOODS CANNOT AFFORD IT, THE GOODS WERE SOLD AND SAVINGS OBTAINED ARE IN NAME NOT REALITY AND SECONDLY THESE SAVINGS OF CHINA AND GERMANY MAY BE GONE, EXISTS IN NAME ONLY BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN SIMILARLY LENT RECKLESSLY SEEKING RETURNS TO BORROWERS WHO HAVE SQUANDERED THE MONEY AWAY.
Politicians and people to blame for mess:
The politicians are to blame for financial messes like in Greece and Italy. They have vested interests to borrow and spend because it stimulates the economy and keep people happy so that they would be re-elected. Further they spent borrowings on for show unproductive ill affordable projects that would reward themselves and what they corruptly siphoned off is considerable.
POLITICIANS BY CORRUPT OR INDIRECT MEANS SIPHONED OFF A LOT OF THE MONEY BORROWED ON THE NATION’S BEHALF AND LEFT THE PEOPLE WITH THE TAB TO REPAY. POLITICIANS STOLE $1 AND GAVE THE PEOPLE 10 CENTS AND THE FOOLISH PEOPLE WERE HOODWINKED OR HAPPY TO TAKE THE 10 CENTS AND NOW THEY ARE LEFT WITH THE BABY.
What bailouts tell those who understand:
The more massive the bailouts, the more serious the situation is.
There have been repeated massive bailouts, massive ‘quantitative easings’ and this means the problem is massive.
WHAT THIS MEANS IS MANKIND IS LIVING WAY BEYOND ITS MEANS AND IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO DO SO IN PERPETUITY THIS WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED.
THUS IF YOU HAVE BEEN LIVING MASSIVELY BEYOND YOUR MEANS IT MEANS YOU HAVE TO SERIOUSLY CURTAIL THAT UNSUSTAINABLE LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS WHICH MEANS A SERIOUS COOLING OF THE ECONOMY.
NOT ONLY THAT, THE SUSTAINED LIVING BEYOND YOUR MEANS HAVE BUILT TERRIBLE EVEN UNPAYABLE DEBTS THAT WOULD FURTHER ACT AS AN ALBATROSS, DRAG ON THE ECONOMY AND SO YOU CAN EXPECT SUSTAINED HARD TIMES, BELT TIGHTENING NECESSITATED BY A NEED TO LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS AND REPAY DEBTS THAT WERE SQUANDERED IN PROFLIGATE CONSUMPTION PLUS LARGE SCALE PLUNDER OF THE SYSTEM DUE TO CORRUPTION.
Argentina tightens dollar exchange controls
The Argentine government has imposed new restrictions on the purchase of US dollars, in an attempt to reduce capital flight and tax evasion.
People wanting to exchange Argentine pesos for dollars must now explain where they got the money, and show they have paid their taxes.
America is the beneficiary of much wealth from all over the world stashed in its safekeeping that it has used, squandered off. Because of various reasons, many wealthy individuals all over the world have stashed their wealth in America that serves to boost the American economy and yet despite such considerable windfalls, America needed to keep printing currency without backing to keep buying from the world.
AMERICA PAYS FOR PURCHASES WITH THE WORLD WITH MONEY THAT IT CAN PRINT INSTEAD OF EARN LIKE THE REST AND IT HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY PRINTING WORTHLESS PAPER TO FINANCE ITS PURCHASES WAY BEYOND ITS CONSIDERABLE MEANS.
THIS WORTHLESS PAPER MONEY PAID TO EXPORTERS AND OIL SHEIKHS IS FURTHER LARGELY DEPOSITED IN AMERICA FOR USE BY AMERICANS AND SO IN THEORY AMERICA HAS PAID BUT IN REALITY THE MONEY HAS REMAINED IN AMERICA AND BEEN ALL SQUANDERED OFF.
PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD FOR VARIOUS REASONS CONVERT THEIR (ILL-GOTTEN) GAINS INTO USD AND THIS TOO IS ANOTHER BOOST TO THE US TREASURY THAT IT HAS SQUANDERED, OTHERWISE IT WOULD NOT BE IN THE DEBT RIDDEN MESS IT IS IN TODAY.
AGAIN AS THE CURRENCY OF SETTLEMENT, MUCH WEALTH ACCRUE TO THE US IN TRANSIT FOR INTERNATIONAL PAYMENTS THAT DO NOT INVOLVE THE US AND HERE IS ANOTHER POOL OF TRANSITORY WEALTH IN TRANSIT THAT CAN BE TAPPED FOR CONSUMPTION.
AMERICA HAS MUCH TO BLAME BECAUSE ITS ABUSE OF ITS POSITION OF ISSUER OF THE CURRENCY FOR SETTLEMENT TO KEEP PRINTING MONEY TO FINANCE PURCHASES HAVE RESULTED IN THE WORLD PRODUCING FAR MORE THAN IT CAN AFFORD, TO CONSUME FAR MORE THAN IT CAN AFFORD LEADING TO TODAY’S DISASTROUS EVEN FATAL CRISIS.
Doing things for fun:
Quote: Sometimes you just want everything organised for you — even the fun, writes Bronwyn McNulty.
People speak of doing this and that ‘just for fun’. Do they know what they are talking about ‘for fun’?
When they say they do something just for fun they mean they do it for no purpose except to stir their mental forces to be excited or liking. Yet they see nothing wrong and see it as a perfectly justified motive to do something.
This is delusion because whatever is stirring mental force for no purpose except to be excited or attracted is suffering in itself and leads to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate for a while until they dissipate sufficiently.
IT REFLECTS PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY SAY AND THEY ARE DELUDED WHEN THEY THINK NOTHING, THINK IT IS NATURAL TO DO THINGS FOR FUN, TO LET THEIR HAIR DOWN ONCE IN A WHILE. IF YOU NEED TO LET YOUR HAIR DOWN ONCE IN A WHILE IT MEANS YOUR LIFE IS REGIMENTED, YOU ARE A ROBOT CONSTRAINED AND CONTROLLED SO THAT YOU NEED TO ‘LET LOOSE’ OR GO WILD OR GO UNCONTROLLED ONCE IN A WHILE TO LET OFF STEAM. IF YOU DO SOMETHING JUST FOR FUN YOU ARE PRACTICING CONTROLLED INSANITY BECAUSE FOR FUN IS NEVER A VALID REASON FOR DOING ANYTHING. NO MATTER WHAT YOU MAY SAY, IF THERE IS STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE TO BE EXCITED WHEN YOU ARE HAVING FUN, IT IS TRAINING YOURSELF TO DO THINGS JUST TO STIR DANGEROUS BLIND MENTAL FORCE AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS MEANINGFUL REFLECTS DELUSION.
For fun and pleasure:
Whenever someone says he is doing something for fun and pleasure, speaking correctly he is saying he is doing something for the excitement (lust, thrill) it stirs and the force received on contact that is experienced as pleasure. It is usually mild force received through contract through sight, sound, touch, smell and taste that is experienced as pleasure but in masochistic cases, extreme force gives a perversion of pleasure to some.
Thus if you are seeking pleasure you are seeking contact with (usually mild) force through the senses, if you are doing something for pleasure you are doing something for the force received and this force received is meaningless, harmful leading to stress, restlessness and inability to concentrate.
THUS A PERSON WHO SEEKS FUN AND PLEASURE IS SEEKING SOMETHING THAT STIRS OF HIS MENTAL FORCE ATTRACTIVELY AND SEEKING SOMETHING THAT PRODUCES MILD FORCE THAT IS EXPERIENCED AS PLEASANT, PLEASURE; IT IS ALL ABOUT STIRRING AND SEEKING FORCE THAT IS BLIND, MEANINGLESS AND FOR ONE WHO SEES RIGHTLY, HARMFUL. THUS WHOEVER SEEKS FUN AND PLEASURE IS FOOLISHLY SEEKING SUFFERING, EXPOSING HIMSELF TO DANGER AND IF YOU THINK IT IS FULL OF MEANING, YOU ARE DELUDED.
Sadness is something people recognize but don’t understand:
Sadness is an emotion or state of people’s minds that they all experience that they can recognize and speak about yet they do not understand.
PEOPLE EXPERIENCE SADNESS AND THEY CAN RECOGNIZE IT IN THEMSELVES AND OTHERS BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND OR UNDERSTAND WRONGLY WHAT SADNESS IS.
SADNESS IS ACTUALLY THE RESULT OF AN ACTIVITY OF THEIR MINDS AND SO THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY ARE DOING THAT CAUSES THE SADNESS AND BECAUSE THEY ARE DOING AND FEELING SAD WITHOUT KNOWING IT MUST STIR FORCE RISING IN RESISTANCE, STIR CONFLICT IN THEIR MINDS.
What do people understand by their sadness?
They understand it as something inevitable, part and parcel of existence, something that is unpleasant even occasionally terrible that they try to shake off by whatever means possible eg distractions, taking alcohol or drugs, sometimes they even foolishly seek sadness by listening to sad songs, act sad eg at bereavements, speak or play an musical instrument or sing with deliberate sadness etc. They even think they are good because they are sad, their sadness is good for themselves and others.
THESE ARE ALL FALSE, DELUDED UNDERSTANDING OF SADNESS THAT ARE DANGEROUS.
And what is the truth about sadness?
Sadness is the consciousness experience generated by the controlled or uncontrollable prolonging of their mental forces of going against self, triggered by events or spontaneously that their forces of self-preservation is struggling to control or losing control.
Sadness is dangerous and addictive so that each time you indulge in and intensify the force used in prolonging you are training yourself to be sad and intensifying your sadness that may descend into deep dark depression thence even suicide.
Sadness is not good for yourself or anyone else but it is meaningless (because it is generated by meaningless force prolonging without doing any work), evil, harmful leading to death and so whoever thinks sadness is good, they are good because they feel sadness is deluded heading for torment.
Sadness has a cause in the constant use of force to prolong or stretch syllables or units of motion in order to fashion style to please and impress others.
BECAUSE A PERSON IS FECKLESSLY USING FORCE TO PROLONG TO FASHION HIS STYLE IN SPEECH AND ACTIONS, HIS MENTAL FORCE IS WELL TRAINED TO PROLONG AND WHEN IT PROLONGS AUTOMATICALLY OUT OF CONTROL THE PERSON EXPERIENCES GENUINE SADNESS THAT IS NOT A SIGN OF VIRTUE BUT THE INEVITABLE EVIL FRUIT OF HIS FECKLESS SHOWMANSHIP.
THE PERMANENT EFFORTLESS CURE TO SADNESS IS TO PAY ATTENTION TO PERSISTENTLY ELIMINATE USING FORCE TO STRETCH SYLLABLES AND ONCE YOUR MENTAL FORCE IS CURED OFF ITS AUTOMATED TENDENCY TO PROLONG, IT IS THE END OF THE CURSE OF SADNESS.
PEOPLE EXPERIENCE AND RECOGNISE SADNESS BUT THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND SADNESS OR UNDERSTAND SADNESS FALSELY. AND SADNESS IS THE RESULT OF WHAT THEIR MENTAL FORCE IS DOING THAT THEY ARE DOING WITHOUT KNOWING AND THIS MUST STIR RESISTANCE AND CONFLICT.
Do you enjoy being a donkey carrying weapons?
Kenya warns of al-Shabab donkeys
Kenya's military spokesman says large groups of donkeys in Somalia will be considered "al-Shabab activity" following reports the militants are using the animals to transport weapons.
There are male and female donkeys and they can be used (abused) by humans to transport arduously, dangerously weapons of war. It may be true there is no possibility of you ending up as a donkey yourself to suffer terrible abuse at the hands of men or it may be true you are in danger of being an animal suffering even endless eternal abuse at the hands of others instead of blissful toil free existence in heaven.
What determines whether you suffer after you die even for an eternity is what bad you do to others that results in karma to be repaid as suffering.
Having said that, the One Well-Gone said further:
Grain, wealth, silver, gold,
or whatever other belongings you have;
slaves, servants, errand-runners, & any dependents:
you must go without taking any of them;
you must leave all of them behind.
or whatever other belongings you have;
slaves, servants, errand-runners, & any dependents:
you must go without taking any of them;
you must leave all of them behind.
What you do with body, speech, or mind:
that is yours; taking that you go;
that's your follower,
like a shadow that never leaves.
that is yours; taking that you go;
that's your follower,
like a shadow that never leaves.
Thus you should do what is fine
as a stash for the next life.
Acts of merit are the support for beings
in their after-death world.
THE BUDDHA TELLS YOU THAT YOU CAN BE BORN AN ANIMAL TO BE ABUSED BY OTHERS AND IT IS WHATEVER WRONG AND HARM YOU DO TO OTHERS THAT WILL RESULT IN REPAYMENT IN BEING BORN AS ANIMALS FOR OTHERS TO SLAUGHTER AND ABUSE.as a stash for the next life.
Acts of merit are the support for beings
in their after-death world.
The global financial crisis is so real but it is all delusion:
Yes, there is a serious even deadly so real financial, economic crisis threatening the world but it is all delusion, exists because of the intransigence, selfishness and greed of all the participants.
Money has no intrinsic values, its value is assigned and so you can print as much money as you like so that values alter drastically but there is nothing to say the former value is correct and the current value is incorrect.
Gold is now worth $1000 per ounce where it was worth $30 per ounce in the past. Who is to say which is right? They are both right and wrong, you cannot assign a value to an item except in delusion.
IF OVERNIGHT GREECE’S CREDITORS RENOUNCE THEIR CLAIMS TO THE DEBTS GREECE OWES, THAT IS THE END OF THE DEBT CRISIS. IT IS BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT RENOUNCE THEIR CLAIMS AND WANT THEIR MONEY BACK THAT SUCH A CRISIS HAS ERUPTED.
A Mercedes or Honda can be manufactured for free provided the raw materials are available, the machines to transform the raw materials into components are available, energy to power the manufacture is available and workers to put them together are available and have been fed. The high values of the cars reflect arbitrary and profit considerations and so provided the means are available to manufacture a Mercedes or Honda, it can be done for no charge or no price so long as the people involved are not concerned about making a profit.
MONEY HAS NO INTRINSIC VALUES, YOU CAN ASSIGN WHATEVER VALUE YOU LIKE AND KEEP PRINTING AS MUCH MONEY AS YOU LIKE, IT IS WHEN PEOPLE LOSE CONFIDENCE IN THE VALUE OF THE CURRENCY THAT IT COLLAPSES AND NO LONGER BECOME A SYMBOLIC VEHICLE OF VALUE.
MONEY ONLY EXISTS BECAUSE OF SELFISHNESS AND GREED, THE NEED TO HOARD TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHERS AND LAY CLAIMS ON OTHERS. IN A REALM WHERE EVERYONE IS WILLING TO SHARE EVERYTHING THERE IS PLENTY TO GO AROUND. A LOT OF WEALTH IN THIS WORLD IS WASTED IN FRUITLESS SENSELESS PURSUITS (EG ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY, GAMBLING, BEVERAGES, TOURISM, FASHION, MUSIC, SPORTS), IF ALL THE RESOURCES ARE DIVERTED TO ESSENTIALS TO KEEP PEOPLE CLOTHED AND FED, EATING ESSENTIALLY RATHER THAN LAVISHLY AND THROWING OUT PERFECTLY GOOD FOOD, THERE WILL BE ENOUGH TO SPARE RATHER THAN FAMINE.
THUS ALL THESE FINANCIAL CRISES ARE THE RESULT OF MAN’S INTRANSIGENCE, SELFISHNESS AND GREED, HIS PROFITEERING AND REFUSAL TO SHARE, HIS HOARDING TO THE EXCLUSION OF OTHERS THAT HAVE RESULTED IN THIS MESS THAT THREATEN TO ENGULF AND DESTROY HIM WITH SOCIAL ANARCHY AND FAMINE.
Quantitative easing is a form of default:
Quantitative easing or the flooding of the system with massive amounts of newly printed money is a form of default, reneging on your debts, dilutes the value of the debt others hold over you.
It is because the debt riding on the system is far more than the wealth in the system and those owing are running into trouble keeping up with repayment or cannot continue to repay that such shenanigans like massively printing money in lieu of stopped debt servicing is necessary.
SO LONG AS THOSE WHO BORROWED SERVICED THEIR DEBTS EVERYTHING IS FINE. BUT IF THEY STOP SERVICING THEN BECAUSE THE DEBT IN THE SYSTEM IS FAR GREATER THAN THE WEALTH IN THE SYSTEM, THOSE IN CHARGE MUST RESORT TO CHEATING, TO PRINTING MONEY TO COVER IN ORDER TO AVOID HAVING TO DECLARE INSOLVENCY OR THE INABILITY TO MEET COMMITMENTS.
BY PRINTING MONEY THEY HAVE FULFILLED THEIR COMMITMENTS BUT IT IS ALL A MIRAGE.
The Buddha’s Advice:
The Buddha’s advice cannot be refuted by anyone, divine, human or devil and so it is that whoever wishes an end to his suffering must undertake one way or another what He prescribed, if you do not, you will never see the end of torment because there is no other way out of torment except the way he pointed out.
Attadanda Sutta:The Training
"Violence breeds misery; look at people quarreling. "Having seen people contending like fish in a little water, fear entered me. The world is everywhere insecure, every direction is in turmoil; desiring an abode for myself I did not find one uninhabited. When I saw contention as the outcome, aversion increased in me; but then I saw an arrow here, difficult to see, set in the heart. Pierced by it, once runs in every direction, but having pulled it out one does not run nor does one sink.
"Whatever are worldly fetters, may you not be bound by them! Completely break down sensual desires.
"A sage should be truthful, not arrogant, not deceitful, not given to slandering others, and should be without anger. He should remove the evil of attachment and wrongly directed longing; he should conquer drowsiness and sloth. He should not lapse into untruth nor generate love for sense objects. He should not delight in what is past, nor be fond of what is new, nor sorrow for what is disappearing, nor crave for the attractive.
"Greed, I say, is a great flood; a whirlpool sucking one down, a constant yearning, seeking a hold, continually in movement; difficult to cross is the morass of desire. A sage does not deviate from truth, standing on firm ground; renouncing all, he is truly called 'calmed.'
"Having actually experienced the Dhamma he has realized the highest knowledge. He comports himself correctly and does not envy anyone here. He who has left behind sensual pleasures, an attachment difficult to leave behind, does not grieve nor have any longing.
"Dry out that which is past, let there be nothing for you in the future. If you do not grasp at anything in the present you will go about at peace. One who, has no cherishing of it as 'mine,' and who does not grieve for what is non-existent suffers no loss in the world. For him there is no thought of anything as 'this is mine' or 'this is another's'; realizing, 'nothing is mine,' he does not grieve.
"To be not callous, not greedy, at rest and unruffled by circumstances. For one who does not crave, who has understanding, there is no production (of new kamma). Refraining from initiating (new kamma) he sees security everywhere. A sage does not speak in terms of being equal, lower or higher. Calmed and without selfishness he neither grasps nor rejects."
Be fair to PM’s family
LETTERS/SURAT
Saturday, 05 November 2011
| By Rizal Omar via The Malaysian Insider I have not met Datin Seri Rosmah or her children. Neither do I have any connection with the prime minister’s family but I am a regular reader of The Malaysian Insider and other news websites and I think many people have been unfair to her. |
He thinks he speaks great sense and good but he is deluded.
YOU NEVER SPEAK TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO ANYONE ELSE, YOU SPEAK BECAUSE SOMETHING IS TRUE AND MEANINGFUL AND SO IF YOU ASK SOMEONE TO SPEAK IN FAIRNESS YOU ARE ASKING SOMEONE TO SPEAK FALSELY NOT TRULY.
IF YOU SPEAK TRULY IT IS NOT TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO ANYONE AND SO ANYONE WHO ASKS OTHERS TO SPEAK FAIRLY IS ASKING OTHERS TO SPEAK FOR A FALSE NOT GOOD PURPOSE AND HE IS DELUDED.
Why he is wrong to ask others to be fair:
If he knows the allegations are false then he should say the allegations are false instead of telling others to be fair.
If he does not know if the allegations are false, how does he know if people are not speaking the truth, being unfair?
WITHOUT KNOWING THAT THE ALLEGATIONS ARE FALSE, HE IS SPEAKING FALSELY ASKING FOR KARMA ASKING OTHERS TO BE FAIR IMPLYING THEY ARE SPEAKING MALICIOUSLY.
IF HE KNOWS THE ALLEGATIONS ARE FALSE, HE SHOULD SAY SO RATHER THAN ASK OTHERS TO BE FAIR.
THUS HE IS A FOOL SPEAKING FOOLISHLY, A BUSYBODY ASKING FOR KARMA NOT MERIT.
To be fair is to pander to, please:
Because stylish emotional people are always seeking to please and impress others, it is expected that they would seek others to speak to please or be fair or pander to others.
TO PANDER TO, PLEASE OR BE FAIR TO OTHERS IS A MAD REASON FOR SPEAKING AND SO IT IS CONTROLLED INSANITY THAT ENDS IN MADNESS.
YOU SPEAK BECAUSE SOMETHING IS TRUE AND RELEVANT TO THE MATTER AT HAND, NOT TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO OTHERS.
Trying to deny and establish his credentials for impartiality:
What has his neutrality got to do with his call for fairness? He is presumptuously trying to establish his impartiality so that his call for fairness is credible.
Quote: I have not met Datin Seri Rosmah or her children. Neither do I have any connection with the prime minister’s family but I am a regular reader of The Malaysian Insider and other news websites and I think many people have been unfair to her.
Why does he think they are unfair to her? Say precisely where they are speaking falsely about her, not unfair to her.
There is no need to establish your credentials for impartiality except to falsely lend credence to your position that people are unfair.
It is mad to say vaguely they are unfair, say they are wrong or false in what they say.
Beware who you uphold:
The person is either an apologist or closet partisan.
Beware who you uphold. Sure there are those who cross the line into rabid slander but are the victims themselves blameless, have they similarly indulged in slander of others?
IF THOSE WHO ARE MALIGNED OR BEEN UNFAIRED TO ARE THEMSELVES NOT INNOCENT, HAVE ALSO BEEN GUILTY OF BEING UNFAIR TO OTHERS, YOU ARE MAD TO CALL FOR FAIRNESS.
IF YOU ASK OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO YOU, HAVE YOU ALSO BEEN FAIR TO OTHERS? IF YOU HAVE ALSO BEEN UNFAIR TO OTHERS, WHY SHOULD YOU EXPECT OTHERS TO TREAT YOU FAIRLY AND SO YOU ARE DELUDED TO ASK FOR ONE SIDED FAIRNESS.
Is this fair?
All those clips of Anwar with the prostitute repeatedly screened by TV3 before prime news time, is that fair?
IF THAT IS NOT FAIR THEN WHAT ARE YOU BAYING ABOUT FAIRNESS IN THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA?
Be fair is a rule, robo-speak:
Be fair is a vague, non-specific rule or the speech of robots.
The person who is not a robot does not speak in generalizations, non-specifics, ‘being fair’ but he addresses specifically the matter at hand on a case by case basis whether it is true, justified or relevant.
A plea to be fair only make sense to people who are robots who have no true understanding, it is a programming, a rule to be adopted or rejected.
‘BE FAIR’ IS NON-SPECIFIC, CAN BE APPLIED TO MANY SITUATIONS, IT IS A RULE AND ALL THOSE WHO ADOPT ARE ROBOTS WHO DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE MATTERS AT HAND. TO TELL OTHERS BE FAIR IS MEANINGLESS, INDISCRIMINATE, IT DOES NOT SPECIFY WHAT THE MATTER IS AT HAND.
Why it is absurd to be fair:
To be fair is to treat two sides equally or impartially and in the matter of allegations being directed at someone, it is a matter of ascertaining the truth not being impartial or treating both sides as equal.
BEING FAIR OR IMPARTIAL DOES NOT APPLY IN THE MATTER OF ALLEGATIONS DIRECTED AT SOMEONE, IT IS A MATTER OF WHETHER THEY ARE TRUE OR FALSE AND IF YOU DO NOT KNOW IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, YOU JUST DO NOT KNOW, YOU DO NOT BE FAIR OR UNFAIR TO THEM WHICH DOES NOT APPLY AND THE FACT THAT YOU THINK IT IS APPROPRIATE REFLECTS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
The matter of being fair, of treating two opposing sides equally or impartially does not arise and so it is absurd to talk about fairness or not favouring one side.
WHENEVER THERE ARE TWO OPPOSING SIDES TO A STORY, EITHER BOTH ARE WRONG OR ONLY ONE IS RIGHT AND THE OTHER IS WRONG AND IN THIS CASE IT IS NOT A MATTER OF BEING FAIR TO BOTH BUT DETERMINING WHO IS RIGHT AND WRONG OR IF BOTH ARE WRONG.
You still need to be fair?
Fairness only applies if you are not sure about the nature of someone and in order not to besmirch his good image or reputation you must be fair to him, not cast innuendos.
If the nature of the person is open for all to see, can be determined by facts in the public domain (his speech and actions) and you are still in doubt and uncertainty, think there is a good image to maintain then you are deluded. It does not matter whether the allegations are true or false, the person’s true nature can be known by his speech and actions and if you still speak of the need to be fair, it reflects delusion.
Fairness like democracy is a human delusion:
Fairness or equality does not exist; it is a false, untenable human fabrication just like democracy. Nature does not correspond with fairness and equality except in human delusion it does.
Democracy upholds freedom of speech and respect of an individual’s differing speech. There is no freedom of speech in this world except if you want to pay for it with your head. Jesus said you will be judged for every careless word you say, if you think that is freedom of speech, you may be right or a big fool, whatever you say must be true and not harm others unless you want judgment and punishment. In any matter if there are two differing opinions then either both are wrong or only one is right and the other is wrong so all this talk about freedom of speech and respect for others’ differing opinions cannot be based on truth but based on pretence, condescension, and so it is for one who discerns.
In the same way, karma exists, there is goodness that leads to good results (never bad results) and badness that leads to bad results (never good results) but fairness does not exist and reality not just here but in the heavenly world does not correspond to fairness but karma.
The Buddha said even a trifling deed can send the man of little merit to hell whilst the same in one with much merit is experienced as a momentary suffering, if a king’s minister takes a goat from you, you are not entitled to punish him but if you owe even a penny and cannot pay, you can be thrown into jail. Beings in this world are never equals but there is even an extreme infinite scale from inferior (eg wisdom) to superior (eg wisdom) between beings. You are not God’s equal and so you cannot claim equality with God, the Buddha said there is no one who is his equal, he alone is sumbuddha, even amongst those who became enlightened by him, he alone is perfect, if he was to share equal or look up to anyone his head would split because he would be guilty of falsity.
Equality or fairness is a hypocritical concept created by deceitful humans that they pay lip service to and refer to when it suits them to get what they want (eg support) from others.
PEOPLE IN THIS WORLD DO NOT WANT OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO THEM, THEY EXPECT FAVOURS AND THEY CANNOT TRULY TREAT OTHERS AS EQUALS BECAUSE THEY HAVE VESTED INTERESTS, THEY SIDE WITH THEIR OWN KIND AND THEY HAVE ILL WILL AND SO ALL THIS TALK ABOUT FAIRNESS IS HYPOCRITICAL OR BLINDLY ACCORDING TO RULES OR PROGRAMMED FIXED RIGID ACCORDING TO RULES FAIRNESS.
FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY DOES NOT EXIST IN THIS WORLD BECAUSE BEINGS ARE NOT ONLY NOT EQUAL BUT THEY ARE EVEN EXTREMELY UNEQUAL AND THOSE WHO ARE NOT EQUAL CANNOT DEMAND EQUALITY FROM THOSE THEY ARE NOT EQUAL TO.
INSTEAD OF EQUALITY OR FAIRNESS, THERE IS KARMA, PUNISHMENT OR SUFFERING FOR BAD AND REWARD IN HAPPINESS AND IT IS WHAT YOU (NOT OTHERS) SAY OR DO, THAT WILL DETERMINE YOUR FUTURE HAPPINESS OR SUFFERING. EVEN A TRIFLING DEED CAN SEND YOU TO HELL AND PUNISHMENT FOR YOUR SINS HERE AS A HUMAN CAN RESULT EVEN IN AN ETERNITY EVEN MANY ETERNITIES IN HELL.
Getting a taste of your own medicine:
If you yourself have spread lies, have slandered others publicly, you should not expect others not spread lies about you and you should not be angry even furious when people spread falsities about you and so if you defend another, tell others to be fair to him, make sure he is a fair person because if he is unfair and can be proven objectively to be unfair, you are asking for karma asking others to be fair to a person who is himself unfair, has demonstrated objectively many times he is not averse to telling lies that slander others.
Why they can never be truly fair:
In order to be truly fair, you must see things clearly as they actually are, not as you like or dislike it to be, you must not side with anyone or yourself, have no vested interests or greed and you must have wisdom, of what is right and wrong, what leads to suffering and what leads to true happiness.
Because people in this world never see things clearly as they actually are, they like and dislike everything they see, they take sides have vested interests and they lack wisdom, do not know what is false and harmful and leads to suffering and what is true and benevolent and leads to happiness, it is impossible they can ever be fair to anyone.
EVEN THEMSELVES THEY ARE NOT TRUE TO, HOW ARE THEY EXPECTED TO BE TRUE TO OTHERS; IF THEY ARE NOT TRUE TO OTHERS THEIR FAIRNESS IS JUST EMPTY BLABBER.
Beings are not equal in being and achievements and so they cannot demand equality from each other. Beings must bow to the Buddha not the Buddha to others even brahmas.
Lonaphala Sutta: The Salt Crystal
"There is the case where a trifling evil deed done takes one to hell. The very same trifling deed done by another is experienced in the here & now, and barely appears for a moment. " There is the case where a person is undeveloped in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: restricted, small-hearted. A trifling evil deed takes him to hell.
" There is the case where a certain individual is developed in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted. A trifling evil deed is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment.
"Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of water. Would the water in the cup become salty and unfit to drink?"
"Yes, lord. There being only a small amount of water in the cup, it would become salty."
"Now suppose a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River Ganges. Would the water in the River Ganges become salty?"
"It's just as when a goat butcher is empowered to beat or bind or slay a person is of little wealth when he has stolen a goat. But he is not empowered to beat or bind or slay a person is wealthy, with many possessions; a king or a king's minister.
"Monks, for anyone who says, 'In whatever way a person makes kamma, that is how it is experienced,' there is no living of the holy life. But for anyone who says, 'When a person makes kamma to be felt in such & such a way, that is how its result is experienced,' there is the opportunity for the right ending of stress."
Why fairness is about falsity not truth:
Fairness only applies if you do not know the correctness of a decision and you nevertheless want to take action and therefore you take into consideration the interests of the parties involved or you want to make a decision not considering truth or correctness but to pander to or appease or satisfy the interests of parties involved.
For one who is discerning, who sees things truly as it actually, the truth about any situation can be known and thus knowing, the right action or decision is never in doubt and there is no question of being fair or taking the interests of parties into consideration.
IF YOU KNOW THE RIGHT ACTION OF A SITUATION, WHAT IS THERE TO BE FAIR OR UNFAIR ABOUT? INTERESTS OF THE PARTIES INVOLVED HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THE RIGHT DECISION SHOULD BE. IT IS ONLY BECAUSE YOU DO NOT KNOW AND YET YOU CHOOSE TO ACT THAT YOU HAVE TO ‘STRIVE’ TO BE FAIR TO THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED. IF YOU TAKE ACTIONS WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT IS TRUE OR RIGHT YOU ARE LAPSING INTO FALSITY WITH SUFFERING DUE.
IN ANY MATTER THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED SHOULD NOT BE A CONSIDERATION, YOU DO NOT TAKE A DECISION TO BE FAIR TO ALL PARTIES BUT WHAT MATTERS IS WHAT IS THE CORRECT ACTION TO TAKE AND THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FAIRNESS.
IF THE TRUTH OR CORRECTNESS OF A MATTER DOES NOT MATTER BUT WHAT MATTERS IS SATISFYING THE DISPARATE INTERESTS OF PARTIES INVOLVED THEN FAIRNESS APPLIES, IF NO CONSIDERATION IS GIVEN TO APPEASING INTERESTED PARTIES, ONLY CORRECTNESS THEN FAIRNESS DOES NOT APPLY.
What the Buddha says concurs with Jesus:
Jesus said even the man who calls his brother ‘you fool’ is in danger of the fire of hell just the Buddha said that a trifling evil done by someone of little merit can send him to hell whilst the same is experienced as a trifling suffering if he has much merit.
"There is the case where a trifling evil deed done takes one to hell. The very same trifling deed done by another is experienced in the here & now, and barely appears for a moment.
" There is the case where a person is undeveloped in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: restricted, small-hearted. A trifling evil deed takes him to hell.
" There is the case where a certain individual is developed in [contemplating] the body, in virtue, in mind, in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted. A trifling evil deed is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears for a moment.
Fairness is the wrong reason for action:
Fairness is about taking the interests of the parties involved into consideration.
You should not take into consideration the interests of the parties involved, that is the path to difficulty and falsity; what you should do is understand the nature of the problem at hand and thus understanding you know the correct action required.
FAIRNESS IS ABOUT TAKING THE INTERESTS OF PARTIES AS A CONSIDERATION IN DECIDING WHEN TRUE DECIDING SHOULD BE SHORN OF CONSIDERATIONS OF PARTIES INVOLVED BUT WHAT THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS.
It is about correctness not fairness:
Whatever the situation or decision, what matters is the correctness never the fairness, never the pandering to disparate interests.
YOU SHOULD NEVER ALLOW FAIRNESS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN MAKING A DECISION, WHAT MATTERS IS THE CORRECTNESS OF THE ACTION, WHETHER IT RESOLVES THE PROBLEM.
IF YOU THINK YOU SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION FAIRNESS WHEN MAKING A DECISION THEN YOU MAY BE CORRECT AND GOOD AS YOU THINK OR YOU MAY BE DELUDED.
This is intrinsically a very unfair world:
Spit at a noble one and it can be very expensive because you can burn in hell even for many eternities, the Buddha said the person who developed a mind of ill will towards his deputies was destined to boil in the deepest hells for many eternities.
If a noble one burns you, you may live to regret eternally your transgression.
YOU CANNOT BURN A NOBLE ONE BUT A NOBLE ONE CAN BURN YOU TERRIBLY. IS THAT FAIR OR UNFAIR, WHO DO YOU WANT TO ARGUE WITH? THAT IS THE WAY THINGS ARE AND YOU BETTER TAKE NOTICE.
When a fire burns down a forest
-- that flame with its blackened trail --
the shoots there take birth once more
with the passage of days & nights.
But if a monk, his virtue consummate,
burns you with his potency,
you won't acquire sons or cattle
nor will your heirs enjoy wealth.
They become barren, heir-less,
like palm tree stumps.
-- that flame with its blackened trail --
the shoots there take birth once more
with the passage of days & nights.
But if a monk, his virtue consummate,
burns you with his potency,
you won't acquire sons or cattle
nor will your heirs enjoy wealth.
They become barren, heir-less,
like palm tree stumps.
So a person who's wise,
out of regard for his own good,
should always show due respect
for a serpent, a fire,
a noble warrior with high status,
& a monk, his virtue consummate.
They seek special rights but speak of fairness:out of regard for his own good,
should always show due respect
for a serpent, a fire,
a noble warrior with high status,
& a monk, his virtue consummate.
If you seek and enjoy special rights in some areas, it is hypocrisy, delusion to speak of fairness in other areas because if you truly practiced fairness you will renounce all special rights.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO ACCEPT AND ENJOY SPECIAL RIGHTS (EG BY RACE OR CLASS) AND THEN TALK ABOUT FAIRNESS IN DEALINGS OR MORALS OR WHATEVER BECAUSE YOU YOURSELF DO NOT PRACTICE FAIRNESS, WHAT RIGHT HAVE YOU GOT TO SPEAK ABOUT FAIRNESS?
FAIRNESS AND EQUALITY DOES NOT EXISTS, IT IS A DELUDED FABRICATION OF CONVENIENCE OF HUMANS TO APPLY WHERE IT SUITS THEM, IT IS NOT A TRUE BASIS FOR ACTION BUT A FALSE BASIS BASED ON THE RIGHTS AND DEMANDS OF INVOLVED PARTIES. ALTHOUGH HUMANS PREACH FAIRNESS, A CONCOCTION BY THEM, THEY NEVER PRACTICE FAIRNESS, THEY WOULD LIKE SPECIAL TREATMENT, FAVOURS AND PRIVILEGES, THEY DEMAND FAIRNESS FROM OTHERS BUT IF THEY CAN GET FAVOURS OR SPECIAL RIGHTS THAT WOULD BE GREAT, PREFERRED AND ONCE YOU ENJOY SPECIAL RIGHTS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION THAT YOU CAN BE FAIR IN YOUR DEALINGS.
SO LONG AS YOU ENJOY AND ACCEPT SPECIAL RIGHTS YOU DISQUALIFY YOURSELF IN PREACHING FAIRNESS IN ANY ASPECT.
THE TRULY NOBLE MAKE NO DEMANDS OR RIGHTS OF OTHERS, IF THEY GET ALMSFOOD FROM YOU THAT IS FINE, IF THEY DON’T GET, THAT TOO IS FINE, THEY ARE NOT HURT OR ANGRY, WHERE THE NEED TO BE FAIR TO THEM?
IF A BEING HAS NO DEMANDS AND NO GREED, FAIRNESS DOES NOT APPLY, IT IS ONLY WHEN A BEING IS DEMANDING, GREEDY THAT FAIRNESS COMES INTO PLAY AND NO MATTER HOW THEY TALK AND DEFINE FAIRNESS, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE THEIR DEMANDING THAT CLASHES WITH OTHERS, THEIR INSATIABLE GREED WILL RENDER ANY TALK OF FAIRNESS MERE HYPOCRISY, NOT PRACTICING WHAT YOU PREACH.
If the person is unfair you are a fool upholding fairness for him:
Before you demand or advocate fairness for anybody, make sure he himself is a fair person, if he is not fair, he has no right expecting and receiving fairness from others.
If you advocate fairness for someone who does not deserve then rather than meritorious, you are creating karma to be experienced as future suffering. He is getting his just desserts when others are unfair in turn to him.
Thus if someone routinely tells lies and slanders others, he is getting a taste of his own medicine and should not complain if others also tell lies and slander him.
LOOK BEFORE YOU LEAP, YOU MAY END IN THE DITCH OF HELL. FAIRNESS IS FOR THOSE WHO ARE FAIR, IF YOU ARE UNFAIR YOU HAVE NO RIGHT EXPECTING OTHERS TO BE FAIR TO YOU. JESUS SAID FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NOT, ALL WILL BE TAKEN FROM HIM AND HE WILL HAVE NOTHING, FOR THOSE WHO HAVE, MUCH MORE WILL BE GIVEN AND HE WILL HAVE PLENTY, WHAT IS SO FAIR ABOUT THAT?
Sleep is a descent to death, meditation is ascent into eternal life:
In keeping with their delusion far more widespread than they realize, people worship sleep, seek a good night’s sleep when the very same sleep they worship is listed as one of the five hindrances or obstructions by the Buddha (ill will, doubt and uncertainty, greed and restlessness, laziness and sleepiness) that detains a being in continual death and suffering when there is a heaven with eternal life without suffering.
WHEN A PERSON SLEEPS HE IS DESCENDING IN CONSCIOUSNESS INTO THE DEPTHS OF DEATH AND SUFFERING.
WHEN A PERSON MEDITATES, HE IS ASCENDING IN ALERTNESS, CONSCIOUSNESS PROGRESSING INCREASINGLY HIGHER FROM SERENITY OF MIND WITH DISCURSIVE THINKING (FIRST HIGHER STATE) TO FULLY CONSCIOUS CESSATION OF THINKING (SECOND HIGHER STATE), THEN NEITHER STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO LIKE OR DISLIKE (THIRD) TO FINALLY NEITHER EXPERIENCING PAIN NOR PLEASURE WHICH ARE PRODUCTS OF CONTACT WITH FORCE (FOURTH HIGHER STATE).
RATHER THAN SLEEP, THE HIGHER A PERSON ASCENDS IN THE STATES OF MIND, THE MORE ALERT HE IS AND HE IS HEADED FOR 1, 2, 4 AND EVEN 500 ETERNITIES WITHOUT DEATH AND SUFFERING.
ANYONE WHO THINKS MEDITATION IS SLEEPING HAS WRONG VIEW.
SLEEPING IS NOT GOOD BUT DESCENDING INTO DEATH AND THE PERSON WHO IS NOBLE REQUIRES VERY LITTLE SLEEP.
AGAIN DREAMING WHATEVER IT IS, DAY OR NIGHT DREAMING IS NOT GOOD BUT BAD, ONCE THE BUDDHA IS ENLIGHTENED HE DOES NOT DREAM, HE ENTERTAINS NO DREAMS OR PRIVATE REALITIES ANYMORE.
Fireworks caused fatal crash:
A firework display near the site of the crash which killed seven people on the M5 is the "major line of inquiry", police say.
It seems a rugby club adjacent to a highway set off fireworks creating a pall of black smoke that drifted across the highway suddenly blinding motorists causing the crash.
THERE IS NEVER ANY JUSTIFICATION TO CELEBRATE, TO LET OFF FIREWORKS WHICH ARE MEANINGLESS AND WASTE MONEY AND SHOULD YOUR FIREWORKS CAUSE GRIEF, SUFFERING (NOISE) AND DEATH, EVEN IF YOU DO NOT KNOW, YOU HAVE SUFFERING DUE IN REPAYMENT FOR YOUR HARM YOU DID TO OTHERS.
THUS ANYONE WHO SETS OFF FIREWORKS IS CREATING DEADLY KARMA FOR HIMSELF, INDULGING IN CONTROLLED INSANITY BECAUSE IT IS MEANINGLESS SETTING OFF FIREWORKS, NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS MADE UP TO BE. I AM NOT IMPRESSED WHATEVER THE FIREWORKS EG OLYMPICS BECAUSE MY MENTAL FORCE IS NOT STIRRED ATTRACTIVELY BY WHAT IS SEEN.
Brinksmanship:
Daily all emotional stylish people are practicing brinksmanship with themselves. They subject themselves to stress and tension from self and others and only pull back sometimes earlier sometimes very late when things get too unbearable, too hot. It is like the person who allows a noose to be placed around his neck and only pulls it loose when it gets too tight or the person who only pulls his fingers off the board when the chopper gets too close.
Because they are constantly exposing themselves to deadly suffering and only pulling back at the brink, they are conditioning themselves ever more compelling in the death wish, to consummate such wilful self harm, to finally go all the way to destroy or kill oneself and one day they finally will.
ANYONE WHO WILLFULLY EXPOSES HIMSELF TO STRESS GENERATED BY SELF OR OTHERS IS PRACTICING BRINKSMANSHIP LIKE THE MAN WHO POINTS A LOADED GUN AT HIS TEMPLE AND MASSAGES THE TRIGGER, ONE DAY HE WILL PULLED THE TRIGGER ON HIMSELF AND CONSUMMATE HIS DEATH WISH.
Kamal Ahmed
Sadly, a Robin Hood tax won't help the poor
If sadness has nothing to do with matters, it is just a meaningless useless stirring of mental force to prolong that achieves no useful work let alone meaning then he is practicing controlled insanity and advocating controlled insanity in others talking about sadness.
The motive may be condescending, to pour cold water or scoff, siding with rich, trying to dismiss something with what may be flawed logic.
IF IT IS TOTALLY NO USE STIRRING MENTAL FORCE TO BE SAD AND YOU BRING SADNESS IN, YOU ARE A FOOL INDULGING IN CONTROLLED INSANITY AND ADVOCATING THE SAME WITH DEADLY KARMA FOR SAYING SO.
Have you changed in style or substance?
People say they have changed but what and how have they changed?
There is cosmetic and true change, there is style change and substance change.
For those who are discerning everyone changed after 1977 because a mandatory consciousness change swept around the world triggered by an unprecedented change in someone (me) and there have been changes after 1997 that are still on going.
But most of the changes in the behaviour and demeanour of people are merely changes of style not substance, cosmetic rather than true changes.
ONLY A PERSON WHO HAS CHANGED TO SHED HIS STYLE, WHO CEASES TO STRETCH HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS IN HIS SPEECH HAS TRULY, MEANINGFULLY CHANGED AND HE IS HEADING EVEN FOR ONE ETERNITY IN HEAVEN BLISS. THE REST ARE RUNNING ROUND IN CIRCLES, KIDDING THEMSELVES THEY HAVE CHANGED, THEY ARE UNREPENTANT, THOROUGHLY DELUDED, CHANGING IN STYLE TO REFLECT CHANGES ALL AROUND, STILL CLUELESS AND HEADED FOR AN APPOINTMENT WITH THE SLAUGHTER.
ANY CHANGES THAT ONLY MODIFY STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS COSMETIC CHANGE NOT TRUE CHANGE, ONLY CHANGE FROM STRETCHING TO NOT STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS TO NOT CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS IS TRUE SUBSTANCE CHANGE.
My first miracle:
Whether there was a global consciousness after 1977 is not subjective to dispute by anyone, it either did happen or did not happen and if it did happen and you are not sure or you think it did not happen then you have a muddled mind which is the way to future woe not safety.
TO ONE SEEING CORRECTLY THERE WAS AN UNPRECEDENTED, UNTHINKABLE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT BENEFITED EVERYONE IN THAT IT LIFTED EVERYONE’S INVISIBLE OPPRESSIVE CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THUS ALLEVIATING THEIR EVER PRESENT SUFFERING AS IF A LOW CEILING WAS CAUSED TO BE LIFTED ENABLING PEOPLE TO STAND UP FOR THE FIRST TIME WHERE IN THE PAST THEY WERE FORCED TO PERMANENTLY CROUCH.
THIS IS MY FIRST MIRACLE BECAUSE I WAS THE PERSON WHO TRIGGERED THAT CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE THAT ALTHOUGH IT AFFECTED EVERYONE, NO ONE BOTHERED TO ACKNOWLEDGE OR ASK WHY BUT THEY ACTED AS IF NOTHING HAS CHANGED, TO THEM IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAT STEVE JOBS CHANGED THE WORLD.
AS JESUS SAID, NOTHING CAN HAPPEN WITHOUT THE FATHER OR GOD’S KNOWLEDGE AND APPROVAL AND SO THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGE AFTER 1977 MUST HAVE GOD’S WILL.
SUBSEQUENTLY IN RECENT YEARS STARTING IN 1997 THERE HAVE BEEN FURTHER CONSCIOUSNESS CHANGES SWEEPING AROUND THE WORLD.
I (AND NOT THE BEATLES OR STEVE JOBS) TRULY CHANGED THE WORLD IN UNPRECEDENTED UNTHINKABLE WAYS THAT WERE MEANINGFUL, ALLEVIATED THE SUFFERINGS OF BEINGS HERE.
Williams apologises in person for racist comment - Woods
To deluded people in this world, this is the end of matters but in the divine scheme of things this is not so.
After apologizing he must ask for forgiveness, if Woods forgives him then the matter is settled, if Woods does not forgive him, then suffering is due in repayment.
I think Williams talked of sticking something up Tiger’s black asshole.
PEOPLE ARE CAVALIER, THINK NOTHING OF THE BRASH ILL CONCEIVED STATEMENTS THEY MADE, THINK IT IS OK OFF THE RECORD, THE PERSON WHO PUBLICIZED THE COMMENT HAS GRAVE KARMA (DIVIDING PEOPLE), EVEN SPOKEN OFF RECORD THERE IS GRAVE KARMA (YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE) AND AFTERWARDS THEY ARE TOO PROUD TO ASK FOR FORGIVENESS NOT REALIZING THEY ARE LIABLE FOR PUNISHMENT UNTIL THE OTHER PARTY FORGIVES THEM.
SO IF YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR YOU, AVOID DOING AND SAYING THINGS THAT YOU MUST ASK FOR FORGIVENESS BECAUSE IF YOU DO NOT ASK AND IT IS NOT FORGIVEN, PAYMENT IN SUFFERING IS DUE.
Not racist?
In the aftermath, many have defended Williams saying he is not a racist. He may behave publicly as not a racist but he may be a closet racist.
What has blackness got to do with Tiger’s asshole?
IF YOU THINK IT IS COINCIDENTAL THAT HE SPOKE OF THE HOLE BEING BLACK, HE IS NEVERTHELESS NOT A RACIST, YOU ARE DELUDED.
HE MAY PUBLICLY APPEAR NOT A RACIST BUT HE IS A CLOSET RACIST, A HYPOCRITE LIKE THE VAST MAJORITY. THEY MAY SMILE AT YOU BUT INSIDE THEY THINK YOU ARE SHIT.
THE OUTBURST REFLECTS HIS TRUE NATURE, WHAT HE PROJECTS PUBLICLY IS A SHOW, HYPOCRISY AND THE VAST MAJORITY IN THIS WORLD ARE HYPOCRITES, THEY NEVER SAY WHAT THEY MEAN, NEVER MEAN WHAT THEY SAY EXCEPT IN THEIR DELUSION THEY DO.
Forgiveness in Buddhism and Christianity:
Jesus said if you do not forgive others their trespasses your Father in heaven will also not forgive you your trespasses on others. Until something is forgiven, the offence stands and payment in suffering is due. Thus when a deluded monk accused Sariputta, the Buddha’s deputy of slighting him, ignoring him, the Buddha asked Sariputta to forgive the repentant monk, lest his head be split into seven pieces.
Below, Sariputta asked the Buddha for forgiveness even when his conduct is impeccable.
"If any deed or word of mine did not please you, O Lord, may the Blessed One forgive me! It is now time for me to go." (Sariputta is saying his final goodbye to the Buddha)
Now once before, the Buddha had answered this, when he said: "There is nothing, be it in deeds or words, wherein I should have to reproach you, Sariputta. For you are learned, Sariputta, of great wisdom, of broad and bright, quick, keen and penetrative wisdom."
So now he made answer in the same way: "I forgive you, Sariputta," he said. "But there was not a single word or deed of yours that was displeasing to me. Do now, Sariputta, what you think timely."
You call this true friendship?
Although Williams had been caddie to Tiger Woods for a long time, there may be bad blood between them as a result of his being sacked as caddie or there may be grievances about severance compensations.
Many appear and sound as if they are your great undying friends; that is so long as you do not cross them or their self interests are not harmed, if you trespass they can even become your sworn enemy and they will kill you.
THIS IS HYPOCRITICAL FRIENDSHIP BUILT ON EMOTION, ATTRACTION NOT GENUINE REASON OR LOVE. THEIR FRIENDSHIP IS DEPENDENT ON YOU PLEASING THEM AND NOT HARMING THEIR SELF INTERESTS. THIS IS THE PERVASIVE TYPE OF HYPOCRITICAL RELATIONSHIP IN THIS WORLD. THE WISE DO NOT DELUDE THEMSELVES AND THEY CAN DISCERN SUCH FRIENDSHIPS WHEREVER THEY ARE AND THEY DO NOT PARTAKE OF SUCH ‘FRIENDSHIPS’ OF CONVENIENCE AND MATERIAL GAINS.
A nonracist making racist comment:
Driven irresistibly by stirred emotion, Williams speaks of a black asshole. That is definitely a racist comment but even Tiger Woods says Williams is not a racist.
So what is the truth of the matter?
The truth of the matter is that people have no true understanding, they perceive falsely that although the comment is clearly racist, the person is nevertheless not racist. What is the big deal about being a racist?
It is because people in this world today make a big deal about being a racist, it is not ‘politically correct’ or taboo to be racist that they avoid the label, they have serious false perception that someone can say something racist and yet not be racist or there is intense urge to deny, to refuse to accept as true what is true.
DENIAL AND THE URGE TO DENY IS INTENSE IN THIS WORLD WHICH IS WHY THEY CAN SAY SOMEONE IS NOT RACIST WHEN THE STATEMENT IS RACIST, THEY BLAME A SLIP OF THE TONGUE, GIVE AN EXCUSE THAT HE WAS ONLY JOKING OR IT WAS A BAD TASTING JOKE. FURTHER THEY DO NOT HAVE TRUE UNDERSTANDING, THEY FALSELY UNDERSTAND THAT YOU CAN UTTER A RACIST COMMENT AND YET NOT BE RACIST. RACISM IS TABOO, DENIED AND THEY PRETEND THEY ARE NOT RACIST WHEN THEY ALL ARE. BLACKS ARE RACISTS TOO BUT THEY BLAME THEIR RACISM ON WHITES.
YOU MAY BE RIGHT THAT BLACK ASSHOLE IS NOT RACIST AND YOU CAN MAKE A RACIST COMMENT AND YET NOT BE RACIST BUT IF THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE YOU ARE TRAINING YOURSELF TO PERCEIVE FALSELY THAT ENDS IN MAD PERCEPTION AND THAT IS ALWAYS TORMENTING.
If it was not racist, why the fuss?
If the comment was not perceived as racist, why was such a fuss kicked up that Williams had to personally apologize and Woods spoke about the matter?
THUS CLEARLY THE COMMENTS ARE WIDELY PERCEIVED AS RACIST AND SO EITHER THEY ALL HAVE FALSE PERCEPTION, ARE BEING OVERSENSITIVE OR IT IS TRULY RACIST.
IF THE COMMENT IS RACIST, THEN ALL THE TWISTED ARGUMENTS ARE SAYING ALTHOUGH IT WAS RACIST, IT WAS A MOMENT’S INSANITY OR SOME EXCUSE, WILLIAMS IS NOT RACIST. WHAT IS THE BIG DEAL ABOUT BEING RACIST? IF YOU ARE RACIST AND YOU DENY IT, YOU ARE HEADING FOR INSANITY TELLING YOURSELF WHAT IS TRUE (YOU ARE RACIST) IS NOT TRUE.
What is stress?
If there is such an entity called stress then its nature can be made known.
There is evidence that heavenly beings also wield force, a heavenly being with flaming club was ready to split Ambatta’s head into seven pieces if he did not answer the Buddha’s question at the third prompting and when the Buddha conquered a demon’s fire with his own fire, there was no suggestion the Buddha was exhausted or stressed afterwards.
So what is the difference or nature of force usage in this world that renders it stressful whilst force use by divine beings appears not associated with stress?
IT IS THE RESISTED OR OPPOSITE FORCE CLASHING USAGE OF FORCE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRESS, STRESS IS THE UNPLEASANT SEIZING OR JAMMING EXPERIENCE THAT TAKES TIME TO DISSIPATE CAUSED BY THE SELF RESISTED USAGE OF FORCE.
WHENEVER A PERSON WILLFULLY SAYS OR DOES SOMETHING HE KNOWS IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, HE SAYS OR DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING IT IS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL (EG BY APING OTHERS), HE DOES SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW (EG STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS), HE DOES SOMETHING WITHOUT KNOWING (EG STRETCHING SYLLABLES WITHOUT AWARENESS), HE MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE THAT MUST BE OVERCOME AND DOGS THAT ACTION IN ITS ENTIRETY.
THUS STRESS IS THE UNPLEASANT EXPERIENCE THAT IS THE RESULT OF SELF RESISTED FORCE USE TO DO OR SAY THINGS THE BEING KNOWS IS FALSE, DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER IT IS TRUE OR FALSE, IS UNAWARE HE IS DOING OR THAT IS MEANINGLESS OR FOR SHOW (EG FASHIONING STYLE). THIS RESISTED FORCE USE WHEN PROLONGED BECOMES JAMMED OR GRIDLOCKED AND TAKES TIME TO DISSIPATE.
EVERYTHING BEINGS HERE DO MUST BE SUBJECTED TO SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN STYLE OR FORCE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT ARE TOTALLY MEANINGLESS, ONLY FOR SHOW AND THEY ARE REHASHING EVERYTHING WHICH MEANS THEY ARE FAKING IT OR FALSIFYING THAT MUST AROUSE SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS, NEVER TRULY FITS THE OCCASION.
Stress is mandatory:
It does not matter how stupid or intelligent the person is, how wicked or unrepentant or tough he is, so long as a person uses force against self-resistance he must experience stress that accumulates the longer he uses force against resistance or friction until it becomes jammed, seizes him and takes time to dissipate and each time he stresses himself he not only suffers but trains himself to better stress himself so that stress rises faster and harder to control and he is headed for insane stress.
IT DOES NOT MATTER HOW CLEVER OR CLUELESS YOU ARE, HOW TOUGH OR UNREPENTENT YOU ARE, SO LONG AS YOU USE FORCE AGAINST SELF RESISTANCE YOU MUST GENERATE STRESS.
AND WHOEVER DOES OR SAYS THINGS HE KNOWS IS FALSE, DOES NOT KNOW IS TRUE (COPY OTHERS), DOES SOMETHING THAT IS MEANINGLESS FOR SHOW (STRETCH SYLLABLES, DANCE, PLAYS FOOTBALL), DOES SOMETHING AUTOMATICALLY BY REHASH WITHOUT KNOWING HE IS DOING, HE MUST STIR SELF RESISTANCE BECAUSE IT IS DANGEROUS TO DO THINGS WITHOUT KNOWING.
What is restlessness?
Restlessness is the mandatory affliction of all emotional stylish people and it is only possible to be restless if you do or say things by rote and there are copies of whatever you say or do in a mental jukebox that your mental force that you have so well trained to stir without true purpose can seize and attempt to activate against your wishes and that is always tormenting.
IF YOU DO THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR MEANINGLESS (EG DANCE OR STRETCH SYLLABLES FOR SHOW), OR YOU STIR YOUR MENTAL FORCE WITHOUT DOING MEANINGFUL WORK (EG STIR TO LIKE, DISLIKE, FEEL SAD OR AGITATED), YOU ARE TRAINING YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO ACTIVATE FOR NO VALID REASON AND THUS STIRRED SENSELESSLY, THE MENTAL FORCE WILL SEEK AND SEIZE RECORDINGS IN YOUR MENTAL JUKEBOX TO ACTIVATE THEM INAPPROPRIATELY.
Two indispensable requisites of restlessness:
There are two indispensable requisites for restlessness:
- Training your mental force to stir for false or no purpose eg training your mental force to stir to like or dislike, to feel sad or hurt (faked hurt)
- Rehashing what you say or do either approximately or precisely according a plan that exists in your mental jukebox.
Once a person’s mental force has been well trained to activate for no true purpose or aimlessly it will activate by itself and it will seek from the vast repertoire of recordings to say or do things that the person struggles to control or suppress and he is headed for mad violent restlessness.
Cat walks 2000 miles back to old house:
This cat apparently walked 2000 miles back to her old home to be reunited with her old friends after her owners took her with them to their new home in NT Australia.
Beings have attachment to their friends and house and rather than amazing, it is suffering and dangerous.
The Buddha is homeless and there is no place he calls home that he wants to return to. As long as there is attachment that is suffering.
That's one long walkabout! Cat walks 2,000 miles across Australia to get home after owners relocate
By Jessica Satherley
Last updated at 5:40 PM on 7th November 2011
This brave cat is believed to have walked almost 2,000 miles across Australia to get back home.
Jessie the cat relocated with her owners from South Australia to a new home in the Northern Territory in March last year.
But soon after the family’s move, Jessie went missing and is thought to have showed up at their old home over a year later.
Cat on a mission: Jessie the cat (pictured) is thought to have walked 2,000 miles through the Australian desert
‘She was here for a couple of weeks and we thought she’d settled in, but soon afterwards Jessie disappeared’, her owner Sheree Gale, 31, told Northern Territory News.
But Sheree is convinced her determined tabby left Berry Springs, just outside Darwin, and walked the distance back to her old home in Ungarra, on the Eyre Peninsula.
More...
- The girl who's going ape to be a good surrogate: How a woman is monkeying around to bring up a gorilla
- Lost and found...then lost again: Jack the cat, who went missing in JFK airport, dies
'I can’t explain it. She hates getting into cars, so I think she has walked,' said Mrs Gale.
More than a year later, the new residents of the Gale’s old home in Ungarra, South Australia, found a strange cat hanging around.
Gone walkabout: Jessie the cat is thought to have walked across Australia, from Darwin to Ungarra
'I took a photo and sent it to Sheree, and she said it was definitely Jessie,' said Jenn Humby, who, for now, is looking after Jessie.
If the cat is Jessie, she would have either endured Australia’s harsh desert or travelled via the coastal route, which would have taken even longer.
When Mrs Gale and her husband, Andre, flew up to Berry Springs, along with Jessie, they had left their other two cats behind with the owners of their old home.
The Gales believe the cats are all reunited now and are happy for Jessie to stay at their old home.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2058630/Cat-walks-2-000-miles-Australia-home-owners-relocate.html#ixzz1d7NIvqBm
You should be good never fair:
Anyone speaking of fairness instead of goodness is guilty of advocating falsity, advocating being calculating that the Buddha said is the path to woe.
True goodness has no consideration of calculating, fairness is about competing interests, balancing your interest or greed against mine and so it is evil not good.
Goodness is independent of any other person or being, has no consideration of others’ interests or rights against mine.
And what is goodness?
As the Buddha said, it is not taking what is not given, not killing or harming, not telling lies, not speaking idly, divisive speech, not taking intoxicants, even no sex or illicit sex.
THUS ANYONE WHO TELLS OTHERS LET’S BE FAIR, YOU MUST BE FAIR IS NOT HEAPING MERIT BUT KARMA ON HIMSELF, IS MISGUIDING OTHERS BECAUSE HE IS TEACHING OTHERS TO BALANCE SELF INTEREST AGAINST OTHERS’ INTERESTS. SPEAKING RIGHTLY ONE SAYS ‘LET US BE GOOD’, YOU MUST BE GOOD.
FAIRNESS IS ONE THING, GOODNESS IS ANOTHER THING AND THEY CAN BE CLEARLY DEFINED AS SUCH AND SUCH. IT IS NOT GOOD TO BE FAIR BUT EVIL, ONLY GOOD IS GOOD. FAIRNESS IS BEING CALCULATING AND CALCULATING IS BAD AND PROGRAMMING.
Evidence again of mankind’s no true understanding:
It does not take supernatural powers but it requires discernment, seeing things as it actually is or true understanding to define that fairness is about balancing contending interests, it is about being calculating and so it is bad, evil, selfish rather than good as preached by mankind.
Goodness on the hand has no consideration of self or other interests and so it is truly good, meritorious.
THE FACT THAT MANKIND ADVOCATES FAIRNESS AND THINKS THAT IT IS GOOD IS EVIDENCE OF MANKIND’S WRONG OR PERVERTED UNDERSTANDING THAT IS PROGRAMMED AND REHASHED OTHERWISE THEY CANNOT CONSISTENTLY PERCEIVE FAIRNESS AS VIRTUOUS, TO BE PRACTICED WHEN IT IS ABOUT BEING CALCULATING, BALANCING SELF AND OTHER INTERESTS AND BAD.
Sarkozy called Israeli PM 'liar'
French President Nicolas Sarkozy called Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu a "liar" in remarks to US President Barack Obama overheard by journalists.
Of course he is a liar (and so is Sarkozy) and it reflects the intense pretense of mankind that they behave as if he is not a liar and they get angry when others call them liars.
IF YOU ARE A LIAR YOU HAVE NO RECOURSE TO GET ANGRY OR UPSET WHEN SOMEONE CALLS YOU A LIAR. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE IS NOT A LIAR EXCEPT IN YOUR DELUSION.
WHENEVER A PERSON LIES, HE HAS TO SEVER OR CUT HIS CONNECTION WITH TRUTH AND IN TIME HIS CONNECTION IS PERMANENTLY CUT AND SO ANYONE WHO REHASHES IS CUTTING OFF HIS CONNECTION WITH TRUTH AND SO IT IS BECAUSE PEOPLE ARE REHASHING ALL THE TIME, THEIR TIES WITH TRUTH ARE PERMANENTLY SEVERED AND THEY ARE LIARS, WHAT THEY DISH OUT IS NEVER THE TRUTH BUT STALE THE SAME OLD REHEATED PRE-COOKED FOOD.
Joe Frazier loses fight with cancer
Just because he is a fighter and he died of cancer does not mean he lost his fight against cancer.
The truth of the matter is Frazier dies of cancer. Without knowing he fought and lost against cancer you are speaking without knowing that must arouse self resistance and stress.
WITHOUT FABRICATING HE CANNOT COME UP WITH THIS ‘CLEVER’ OR WITTY STATEMENT AND BECAUSE HE CANNOT BE SPEAKING KNOWING WHAT HE SAYS IS TRUE, HE MUST GENERATE SELF RESISTANCE AND THENCE STRESS AND CONFLICT SAYING SO.
You’re paying taxes, so why aren’t energy companies?
The fact that you are paying tax has nothing to do with energy companies not paying taxes and it is a deadly false association that he is cultivating with the purpose of stirring readers’ emotions to become interested and even angry. People think what they say is full of sense and readers see nothing wrong, but his intention is to stir, to be divisive and that has karma.
No comments:
Post a Comment