No Reason In Doubt

There Is No Reason In Doubt & No Reason To Doubt:
There is no reason in doubt and no reason to doubt.
There is a reason for doubt or why doubt occurs but there is no reason in doubt.
Because the Buddha said that it is possible to live completely freed from doubt and uncertainty and I have achieved it and know it is true, because doubt and uncertainty is never a pleasure but always suffering that gets worse with practice, there is NO reason IN doubt (doubt is never reasonable or rational) and NEVER reason TO doubt (doubting is never justified). The faith that Jesus spoke of is the opposite of doubt and uncertainty that is the affliction of ordinary people who believe in this world. Jesus called Peter a man of little faith when he became anxious or seized by doubt whilst walking on water and started to sink. He said that if you have faith (or lack of doubt and uncertainty) that is as small as a mustard seed, you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done.
It may not be possible to convince ordinary people that there is no reason in doubt and there is never reason to doubt not because they are correct but precisely because doubt is never reasonable or based on reason (it only appears to be based on reason), they have reason to continue doubting because they continue to sin and suffer insolubly, they are never masters of their doubts but slaves to their doubting that has long become involuntary or helpless and even mad because despite clear reasoning, they cannot be quite convinced, their shadow of belief in falsity lurks and they nevertheless doubt that there is no reason to doubt. Only the person who is free from suffering, calm and clearly thinking with a centered mind has no reason to doubt and therefore knows without doubt there is no reason in doubt and no reason to doubt at all. Without attaining this state, you have reason to doubt and must proffer excuses clothed as reason why you must doubt.
THERE IS NEVER REASON TO DOUBT BECAUSE IF YOU ALWAYS LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY, YOU NEVER PRETEND TO KNOW WHEN YOU DON’T KNOW AND NEVER PRETENDED NOT TO KNOW WHEN YOU KNEW, YOU NEVER SAY YES WHEN YOU MEAN NO, YOU NEVER SAY NO WHEN YOU MEAN YES, WHAT IS THERE TO DOUBT? IF YOU NEVER FORCED YOURSELF OR ALLOW OTHERS TO FORCE YOURSELF TO ACCEPT FALSITY AND SELF-HARM, WHAT IS THERE TO DOUBT OR QUESTION?
IF THERE IS NO REASON WHATEVER TO DOUBT THEN WHATEVER REASONS PROFFERED BY ANYONE WHY HE DOUBTS ARE FALSE OR MERELY EXCUSES OR RATIONALIZATIONS. IF ALL REASONS PROFFERED ARE EXCUSES THEN THERE IS NO REASON IN DOUBT BUT INSTEAD DOUBT IS MERELY A BLIND EMOTIONAL RESISTANCE THAT WAS ORIGINALLY GENERATED BY THE FORCED ACCEPTANCE OF FALSITY AND SELF HARM THAT HAS AN INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE APART FROM THE FALSITY THAT WAS ITS CAUSE AND CAN SPREAD TO INFECT TRIVIAL MATTERS THAT SHOULD NOT TRIGGER DOUBT AND IN THE ADVANCED STAGE, EVEN WHAT IS TRUE EG BREAD IS FOOD CAN TRIGGER MAD DOUBT THAT CANNOT HE SHAKEN OFF.
IF THERE IS REASON OR TRUTH IN DOUBT OR DOUBT IS REASONABLE, IT WOULD NOT INEVITABLY DEGENERATE WITH REPEATED PRACTICE TO BECOME INCREASINGLY INTENSE, INVOLUNTARY, INDISCRIMINATE AND SUFFERING. IT IS BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN DOUBT; IT IS A FORM OF CONDITIONING OF THE MIND THAT DOUBTS, IT IS BLIND AND FALSE THAT IT TENDS TO BECOME MORE INTENSE, MORE INVOLUNTARY, TORMENTING & INDISCRIMINATE WITH PRACTICE.
THE ONLY REASONS FOR DOUBT ARE BECAUSE YOU NEVER LET YOUR YES BE YES ONLY, YOU SAY YES WHEN YOU MEAN NO, YOU PRETEND TO KNOW WHEN YOU DON’T AND PRETEND NOT TO KNOW WHEN YOU DO, YOU FORCE YOURSELF OR ALLOW OTHERS TO FORCE YOURSELF TO ACCEPT WHAT IS FALSE AND HARMS SELF AS TRUE OR BENEFICIAL. THERE ARE NO CASE BY CASE, SPECIFIC REASONS FOR DOUBT AND WHATEVER REASONS THAT ARE PROFFERED TO DOUBT ARE MERELY EXCUSES, A FORM OF SELF AND OTHER DECEPTION.
It is wrong to believe that doubt is or can be a passive live case by case response to situations that arise but doubt is always a forceful blind resisting or confronting condition or attitude of a mind that has been forced by self or others to accept falsity as true or self harm and because doubt is blind and forceful, it is habituating or addictive with practice and can be blindly transferred to involve trivial matters than shouldn’t be subject to doubt and ultimately even what is true eg bread is food is doubted even intensely unshakably.
Doubt is an independent mental entity that is separate from the forced acceptance of falsity or self-harm that is the cause of it. Doubt is merely a primitive reflexive blind forceful resistance that is devoid of consciousness or reasoning that must arise in any mind that is forced either by self or others to accept what is false and harms self and because it is forceful and blind it can be subsequently transferred to targets for doubt other than what originally is reason for the doubting.
If there is reason in doubt, why does it always degenerate with time and practice to become involuntary (cannot help it), indiscriminate (more and more bizarre involving things not worthy of doubt and finally even simple truths like doubting bread is food) and intense agonizing doubt?
The fact that doubt tends to become more severe and bizarre with age and practice indicates it is false, conditions and is a form of suffering to those afflicted.
Doubting may appear reasonable or be accompanied by reasons but the reasons are secondary and often excuses to justify doubting and they are far outweighed by the force that always accompanies doubt and is actually the backbone or substance of all doubt with any reason being fancy dresses.
The danger in doubting is that it is always forceful and so it has strength, ease of arousal and difficulty in exiting that will increase with conditioning or repeated practice, it is a conditioned state of the mind that can be transferred to trivial matters not worthy of doubt and in its terminal state even what is fundamentally true (eg bread is food) is subject to unshakeable intense doubt.
Because doubt is always forceful, conditioning and can be transferred in an increasingly malignant fashion to other matters, there is no reason in doubt and no reason to doubt.
Anyone who justifies doubt, who says that surely we must doubt and experience doubt in this world is a fool who does not realize he is advocating suffering that leads even to tormenting madness for himself and others.
Faith Is The Opposite Of Doubt & Uncertainty:
Doubt and uncertainty is the opposite of the faith that Jesus spoke of when he said that if you have faith (that this world is not immutable but a fabrication or creation) as little as a mustard seed you can tell a mountain to move and it shall be done. Because all ordinary people are forceful, their faith is forceful and false and they have no passive true faith even as small as a mustard seed.
Anyone who is beset by doubt and uncertainty cannot be said to have true faith. If you think you can practice all the doubt to persecute yourself and others in daily matters and nevertheless have true religious faith, you may be a great fool because there is one kind of faith whether it is daily life or religious life. There is one kind of doubt and uncertainty and it is same in daily life as in the spiritual life.
Therefore anyone who doubts others and himself is a man of no true faith.
How Doubt Turns Mad:
Although there is no reason to doubt what is true (eg bread is food) or does not harm oneself and it is only truth’s imposter what is false (eg sand is food) or self hurting that if not rejected outright but is forced by self or others to be accepted, that must be subject to constant doubt or questioning, it is in the nature of forceful conditioning blind doubt that with repeated practice even to intense levels that it can spread indiscriminately like a cancer to infect trivial matters that should not be subject to doubt (eg will the lab boy collect the blood today) until finally what is simple and true that bread is food is even doubted in a fashion that is unshakable and the fool starves.
THE NATURAL COURSE OF ALL DOUBT IS THAT BECAUSE IT IS FORCEFUL AND CONDITIONING, WITH PRACTICE IT WILL BECOME INVOLUNTARY (CANNOT HELP IT), EASY TO AROUSE, RISE TO MORE INTENSE LEVELS AND BE HARD TO SHAKE OFF, SPREAD TO INVOLVE TRIVIAL MATTERS AND ULTIMATELY TRUTH ITSELF THAT SHOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO DOUBT IS DOUBTED MADLY. IGNORE OR SCOFF AT YOUR OWN FUTURE PERIL. NEVER DOUBT YOURSELF OR OTHERS OR ANYTHING BECAUSE THE FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS PRESENT IN YOUR DOUBT WILL BIND AND TORMENT YOU BEFORE IT FINALLY KILLS YOU.
Quote Headline: Uncertainty Over Palestinian Poll.
Comment: Just because you do not know what the result of the poll will be does not mean you must be (emotionally) uncertain. It is because you are attached to it or have vested interests, you cannot let your yes be yes only and accept that you do not know what the result will, you are owner of strong doubt and uncertainty that can be roused and attached to this subject that you become emotionally uncertain, something that is never a pleasure but can reach tormenting hard to shake intensity.
If you are truly unattached to anything in this world, you let your yes be yes only, then no matter what happens at the poll, you are unruffled so what is there to disturb you mentally?
To be attached to the affairs of others that you have no control over, in this case the Palestinian poll, is a form of going against self or foolishness. Many like to think they are wise and would never harm themselves but they are great fools to attach themselves to other people’s affairs. Nobody is passively but they are always forcefully attached and the force conditions their minds to be increasingly attached here than can be transferred to silly templates for attachment and will end in agony and insanity.
Doubt and uncertainty has nothing to do with reality, existence, truth or falsity but it has everything to do with the forced acceptance of falsity and self harm by a mind that must then compulsorily doubt or question that acceptance so long as that acceptance remains and it is the nature of forceful questioning that initially you question what is false and self harming but increasingly because that questioning is conditioning, you question even what is true and beneficial (bread is food) and you are slowly descending into madness. Because doubt cannot be resolved because the person continues to consort with falsity and self harm, it leads to emotional uncertainty as the being becomes resigned and no longer effortlessly certain of anything since he accepts falsity and self harm as true and good.
Why should I or anyone be uncertain about the Palestinian poll? I merely do not know what the result will be; to be uncertain is the anything more that comes from evil.
ANYONE WHO STRETCHES HIS SYLLABLES, CHANGES SPEED AND LOUDNESS MUST DOUBT HIMSELF BECAUSE THOSE ACTIVITIES ARE NEVER OCCASIONAL BUT CONSTANT TO CUMULATIVELY CREATE UNNECESSARY STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS THAT REACH TORMENTINF PROPORTIONS. DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE THE IMPORTANCE OF STOPPING THE STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES AND SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES.
Muttering Is Expressing Doubt & Uncertainty:
Whenever people mutter to themselves or others, they are arguing often in a vague or imprecise dingdong way and practicing or reinforcing doubt and uncertainty in themselves.
Do Not Underestimate Doubt & Uncertainty:
Like the tip of an iceberg ordinary people underestimate the extent of doubt and uncertainty in their lives and therefore its future dangers.
The reason is because they forcibly control and suppress doubt and uncertainty and being distracted most of the time and poorly discerning, they are often unaware they are expressing and experiencing doubt and uncertainty that pass through their minds all the time like cirrus or wispy clouds on a windy day.
Being hesitant or jerky in speech and motion is a form of expressing uncertainty; they are often easily panic, not knowing what to do eg when driving they get anxious and ask their companion anxiously what to do, turn right or left. Nervousness is a sign of doubt and uncertainty.
Like an engine that merely idles and never stops, doubt and uncertainty hovers in the background and because it has already become mad, doubt and uncertainty can suddenly rise intensely at certain thoughts and situations. At other times doubt and uncertainty gnaws at the self-confidence like a toothache sometimes become excruciating they want to do away with themselves.
A Shadow That Never Leaves:
Like a rubber band wound a few times around a rolled up paper, doubt and uncertainty are constantly wound around ordinary people who are actors, only the number of windings differ in individuals (some people’s doubt and uncertainty are wound more tightly around them than others). The reasons people are not aware of the presence of doubt and uncertainty are because they are automatically suppressed and controlled and provided situational challenges are not overwhelming, being distracted and preoccupied with their daily greedy pursuits and worries and used to their baseline doubt and uncertainty, they are unaware of the constant presence of doubt and uncertainty just as they are normally unaware of their shadows even though their shadows are present all the time and only the intensity of the shadow varies with lighting.
This is unsurprising because they are constantly forcefully falsely going against themselves in the manner and substance of what they say, do, think and perceive in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others that must generate doubt and uncertainty that can only be suppressed, controlled and ignored.
If people observe themselves carefully they might find themselves hesitant or uncertain over even trivial matters but because it is relatively mild, it can be shaken off by the next distraction that comes along and they have got used to it, they fail to realize they uncertainty is their default mental state. For instance, when asked “Have you eaten?” they hesitate, waver for a few moments before answering emphatically with fabricated forced certainty, “Yes!” Every time you experience uncertainty, every time you question yourself or others, you are reinforcing, conditioning yourself to doubt and be uncertain and on every occasion you experienced intense doubt or uncertainty, you have conditioned yourself to intense doubt and uncertainty and unless you take steps to calm yourself, to kill doubt and uncertainty, you are headed for a cliff down which you must jump when you get there.
Anyone who is stressed, restless, distracted, nervous or anxious or harried or easily panicked is uncertain.
Only a person whose mind is always calm, clearly thinking, centered, unrushed by anything at all, cannot be provoked by others behavior is certain without doubt; and because ordinary people are beholden to others, they are not masters of themselves but slaves to provocation, they must be uncertain and have not tasted effortless passive certainty that is an incomparable release from the suffering of uncertainty.
Quote: Telling the mother to push does not speed up delivery.
Comment: It is medical practice to exhort delivering mothers to push as hard as they can in coordination with contractions but whoever first espoused this and whoever practices this with unquestioning religious fervor may have faith in rites and precepts a fetter to future woe and may be creating grave karma for himself.
If the mother wants to push, she will do it herself. Instead by forcing her to push against her wish you are forcing her to go against her wish creating doubt and uncertainty in her. Many totally believe they are doing good when they exhort loudly, “Come on! Give it a push!” when they may be creating future suffering for themselves as they cause tension in the mother.
Similarly a lot of medical advice that is given with fervor and conviction is misguided and logically unsound and patients adopt them by faith against their wishes to create conflict or doubt and the doctors who advice so may be creating mental torment for themselves they never dreamt possible.
Yawning Sin:
It is not that you cannot yawn but the way all ordinary people yawn is sinful, not letting their yes be yes only.
They forcefully stretch their yawn, often not just making it loud but with accelerating loudness and speed that is not a pleasure to the ears of others but irritates.
Those who are tone sensitive are aware it is not a mere yawn but a yawn of derisive or disgusted boredom or lashing out.
Putting On A Sarcastic Show:
Just as you can be sarcastic in speech, you can also be sarcastic in bodily conduct. When you are sarcastic in bodily conduct, you intentionally or unintentionally behave in a way that contradicts your intention or emotion.











Many like to think that it is only others who are capable of acting or putting on a show, they are too genuine or good to act, they are not so foolish as to go against themselves to hurt themselves but they are only kidding themselves because not only do they act and go against themselves but they do it all the time, even in private moments without awareness.
It is not the usual thing for high profile or high standing people invited at a function to read newspapers or twiddle with their hand phones as Lim Guan Eng did above and he is doing so or putting on a show not coincidentally but to send a message that he is displeased as a result of him and his wife suffering a humiliating defeat by not being elected by the Melaka DAP.
All ordinary people or actors, no matter how they might champion free competition, are always poor losers because they have strong self identity views (always powered by irresistible mental force) and pride that will be automatically hurt when they are (forcefully) thwarted by others; they only on occasions force themselves (falsely) or restrain themselves to express graciousness in defeat (false humility that they believe is from the bottom of their hearts) or hide their hurt or they feel hurt to need to lash out indirectly or sarcastically. Only a person who has no mental force, no emotions or pride will not be hurt whatever the circumstances and will therefore not feel humiliated to pretend not to be hurt or lash out.
It is unlikely to be an accident that his wife and father did not turn out and it is not necessarily out of goodwill that Guan Eng turned up but it may be vested interest to maintain a relationship with his adversaries however strained or a (sinful) desire to sleep with your enemy. By so doing, he and his family is forcefully going against themselves to turn up minimally in a way to send a message of displeasure whilst putting up the pretense of everything as usual.
In the same way, it is not necessarily out of goodwill that his adversary welcomed his belated arrival but he may be secretly relishing seeing Guan Eng arrive to eat humble pie. There is grave karma for hypocrisy and (secretly) gloating over another’s misery.
Even at the best of times, he and everybody are actually putting on a show being stressfully nice never good to each other, so what is so different now? The difference is that whereas in good times there is no conflict between their expressed camaraderie and the (false) emotions that drive it, in this case there is sarcasm or forceful conflict between their expressed behavior and their inner thoughts and emotions.
Beneath the well practiced impassive demeanor (the reason why he is so good at this is because he has done variations of this many times before, he may think he is the master of his ‘cool’ but he is trapped, a conditioned man and conditioning himself further each time he does this) seethes significant conflicting anger or displeasure and he is setting himself up for future torment when he cannot help expressing and experiencing intense opposing emotions.
It is enough suffering to forcefully or emotionally act but to act the opposite of the actual emotion occupying your mind is conditioning your mind to even greater agony. To act the opposite of their actual emotions is not mandatory to acting but it is an option actors foolishly exercise not realizing they are heightening their agony now and later. In the same way just because you are an actor does not mean you must forcefully doubt or question everything in yourself and others but you do so foolishly to court intense mad doubt and uncertainty.
What is one suppose to do in this situation? If you have to think what you should do, you are already fabricating or rehearsing and will thus act. You should not put yourself in limbo. If you are truly hurt in pride then don’t turn up instead of turning up half heartedly being neither here nor there. A person who is a non actor will not be hurt if he is not elected (I have no interest in holding any office) and therefore feels no strain in attending the function, does not have to put on a show as if he is gay and not hurt or aloof.
Trying Hard Not To See Truth:
Actors who think or believe they strive, try their best to see the truth in this world, in themselves and others are kidding themselves or deluding themselves because for one who sees correctly actors actually strive not to see, they avoid seeing truth. The truth they strive to see is emotional or forced or faked or false truth.
When pretentious people see me approach or hear me speaking effortlessly without style or pretense they often turn their faces away or look away sometimes hiding a face that has involuntarily turned ugly and is trying to conceal their hate.
True truth needs no effort to see and the more force, the more they strive, the more they cannot see the truth.
Even when truth is presented right in front of them, they turn away and refuse to see, preferring pretense.
A Misguided Pope:
BY PUBLICLY SPEAKING ABOUT THE HUMILIATION OF POVERTY, THE POPE IS TELLING PEOPLE THAT POVERTY IS HUMILIATING AND BY IMPLICATION WEALTH IS RESPECTABLE OR THE WAY OUT OF HUMILIATION AND THE POOR SHOULD FEEL HUMILIATED OR BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES. IF THE GULLIBLE AMONGST THE POOR SHOULD START FEELING HUMILIATED WHERE PREVIOUSLY THEY DID NOT WHILST OTHERS ARE STIRRED TO FEEL AGGRIEVED & RESENTFUL AGAINST THE WEALTHY THEN HE IS MISGUIDED AND SPEAKING RECKLESSLY TO UNWITTINGLY FUELING A CLASS WAR.
EMOTIONS ARE ALWAYS FALSE & STRESSFUL SO TO ATTACH EMOTIONAL HUMILIATION TO POVERTY AND IMPLY THAT WEALTH IS THE ANTIDOTE AND RELEASE FROM HUMILIATION IS FALSE LOGIC AND POTENTIALLY DIVISIVE AND IRRESPONSIBLE NOT WISE.
ONLY A PROUD PERSON CAN BE HUMILIATED. A PERSON WITHOUT PRIDE, WITHOUT EMOTION WITHOUT FORCE CANNOT BE HUMILIATED. THAT THE POPE SPEAKS OF HUMILIATION INDICATES HE HARBORS & APPRECIATES PRIDE & HUMILIATION NOT IN KEEPING WITH WHAT JESUS SAID THAT PRIDE IS A SIN.
ANYONE WHO HARBORS AND EXPERIENCES OR KNOWS HUMILIATION IS A SINNER NOT SAINT. NOWADAYS I DO NOT HARBOR THOUGHST OF, DO NOT EXPERIENCE OR COUNTENANCE HUMILIATION IN MYSELF OR OTHERS.
The Buddha spoke of being born to the hungry shades as punishment for sins and therefore those who are born to poverty may not be innocent victims who are born into poverty through no fault of theirs and if you are not careful, you may be destined to be born in the future to the hungry shades as punishment. To be born into poverty is suffering but it is not humiliating unless you are a proud man ashamed of your poverty.
There is nothing emotional (and humiliation is an emotion) about being poor and if you believe that or see poverty is a humiliation, you have false perception or projecting your own humiliation into a condition that is intrinsically neither humiliating nor non-humiliating and is headed for mad perception when your false perception become uncontrollably true.
Only a proud man can be humiliated, there is no humiliation in one with no pride or emotion. Considerations of humiliation or pride do not occupy my mind nowadays because there is no force in my mind and you need mental force to power pride and its offshoot humiliation. That the pope described poverty as humiliating indicates he is a proud man.
Why it is an appeal to the emotion:
Why is the pope’s message and appeal to the emotions?
If you speak of topics (terrorism, intellectual achievements, poverty, environmental degradation) that you think you ought to speak about or mention because of your perceived position of moral authority without offering meaningful solutions, where there are no meaningful solutions then you are appealing to the audience’s emotions. If in addition you use emotional words like ‘victims’ (of their emotional achievements), ‘menace’ of terrorism and the ‘humiliation’ of poverty, if in addition you speak with palpable emotion in a forceful way with stretched syllables and dramatic constant changes in speed and loudness then you are appealing to the audience’s emotions, a sin and inducing stress, never meritorious or alleviating stress.
On the other hand, if you spoke unemotionally about subjects that are relevant to the audience, that have rational solutions that will offer them release from their suffering if they put into practice, then you are appealing to the reason. For instance I point out that the reason why ordinary people must experience restlessness is because they are practicing constant forceful changes in speed and forcefulness (loudness) in their speech, motion, thought and perception that leads to episodic loss of control and forcefulness, that will lead to final total loss of control and mad restlessness and the way permanently out of restlessness is to practice constancy in speed and forcefulness in speech, motion, thought and perception. The reason why people experience distractibility is because they behave with a combo of simultaneous substance and style that cannot be performed live but it must be prerecorded and rendered by rote from a mental jukebox with need for consciousness and the only way out is to abolish all style.
THERE CAN BE NO TRUE GOODWILL AND THEREFORE PEACE ON EARTH BECAUSE ALL ITS DENIZENS ARE FALSELY FORCEFULLY ACTING DRIVEN BY ILL WILL; WHAT PEOPLE CALL GOODWILL IS FALSE, FORCEFUL FABRICATED GOODWILL THAT STRESSES ALL PARTIES INVOLVED AND IS THEREFORE UNSTABLE. IF YOU THINK YOU CAN MEANINGFULLY APPEAL FOR PEACE AND GOODWILL, YOU THINK PEACE AND GOODWILL IS POSSIBLE YOU MAY BE HEADED FOR MADNESS AND HAVE WRONG VIEW THAT LEADS TO HELL OR THE ANIMAL WOMB ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA.
Two Kinds:
There are two kinds of conceit.
If you are truly happy free from mental woes and you are basking passively in your exalted state without harming others, this is passive emotionless conceit based on true premises.
If you are a tyrant persecuting others and you think you are the great benefactor of others or you are truly glorious, you are emotionally or forcefully conceited based on false premises.
There are two kinds of love.
There is the passive force free without show love that benefits the recipient and does not manipulate the person, wanting something in return eg slavery.
There is the forceful emotional demonstrative or full of show type of love that is actually harms the recipient, detains the recipient not only attached to the person but in mental agony and conflict.
Respect is of two kinds:
There is forceful fabricated for show respect that is not for the person but the power he wields, his position or wealth.
There is passive not for show respect for the person because of who he is, a person of truth, wisdom and goodwill and not because of his status.
There are two kinds of restlessness: mad forceful constant human restlessness and rational passive divine change.
Existence is about the desire for change and the changing but whereas the divine restlessness is desire for forceless changes that are meaningful, not for show or constant the restlessness of all beings on earth is forceful even to violent levels, constant with constant changes in speed and loudness or forcefulness.
The vital difference between the two kinds is that the forceful type is stress, leads to mental torment and perdition whilst the passive one is true joy free from mental affliction and leads to heavenly existence.
Keep smiling:
(I am being sarcastic or mocking to say ‘keep smiling’ because I do not mean it but I mean the opposite of what I say ‘stop smiling’)









There is no reason why anyone will maintain a smile except that she wants others to know how happy or confident or desirable or friendly she is. No matter how happy or friendly you are it is actually incomparably happier and friendlier to sport no expression at all because your smile is a provocation for others to return your smile. If you must express yourself (smile, frown, snort, glare, look puzzled or stunned) you must suffer stress that leads to restlessness and distraction. This is an universal law with no exceptions.
She is actually in a daze, seeing but unseeing as a result of her false smiling or acting to be charming and her smile is rendered by rote from a mental jukebox as she has done so many times in the past without need for attention. Not to smile in situations that provoke smiling in her is the most difficult if not impossible thing for her to do. She is a slave of her smiling than master.
All smiles are never constant in speed and force but they vary from gently to rapidly in speed and force depending on how impressive she wants to impress you with. No matter how gentle the variation in speed and force, it induces restlessness that serves as the drive to do or say things that perpetuate the restlessness.
Initially you force yourself to smile creating stress in the process that you may not be aware because you are preoccupied or detained by others who maintain you in your smile and by the time you are aware, the stress has usually become too intense to shake off and thus seized by mental force, you are now forced to use force in whatever you say or do in a vicious cycle of stress begetting more stress that if you are not careful to regularly break these tightening spirals of stress before they get too intense, might prove fatal should you then lose control of your stress to become destructive.

This too is a smile (that can be appreciated by him and observers) that may fool the unwary he is not smiling. However faint the smile, it is not to be condoned (unless you enjoy suffering) and there is mental force and restlessness backing the smile that like an idling engine, keep the fires of stress, restlessness, distraction, doubt and uncertainty glowing. His eyes are seeing but not seeing, in a low grade daze induced by his smiling and acting. In order to attend to matters that have arisen, he must shrug off this daze and he is in danger whilst in this dreamy daze.
(You can smile forcefully or emotionally mentally without a visible expression and that too will be self deception and a source of stress, restlessness and distraction)
ANYONE WHO SMILES OR LAUGHS VERY SOON LAPSES INTO A FORCEFUL DAZE OR DISTRACTION AS THE STRESS AND RESTLESSNESS INEXORABLY RISE USUALLY WITHOUT HIS AWARENESS BECAUSE HE IS PREOCCUPIED IN BEING CHARMING FOR MANIPULATIVE PURPOSES AND USUALLY BY THE TIME HE IS AWARE HE IS STRESSED, RESTLESS OR IN A DAZE, HE IS TOO WELL SEIZED AND DAZED TO OFFER ANY RESISTANCE AND THUS SEIZED HE IS FORCED TO SPEAK OR BEHAVE FORCEFULLY BY ROTE APPROXIMATELY FROM HIS MENTAL JUKEBOX TO PERPETUATE HIS SELF ABUSING CONDUCT UNTIL HE SLAMS ON THE BRAKES BECAUSE HE IS TOO STRESSED BUT HE HAS CONSTANT FEAR THAT BY SELF OR OTHERS HE MAY FORCE HIMSELF OVER THE BRINK ONE DAY TO BECOME DESTRUCTIVE.
IT REFLECTS SERIOUS POOR INSIGHT OR DISCERNMENT TO REGULARLY SMILE WITHOUT KNOWING YOU DO SO OR HOW IT IS THE SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION YOU MUST EXPERIENCE.
***
THERE IS NEVER JUSTIFICATION FOR ANGER UNLESS YOU WANT TO SUFFER NOW AND LATER EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY BECAUSE ANGER NOT ONLY ABUSES OTHERS BUT CONDITIONS THEM TO ANGER EVEN AS IT ABUSES YOUR OWN MIND & CONDITIONS IT TO GREATER ANGER IN THE FUTURE. THE ONLY REASON WHY PEOPLE ARE SO EASILY ANGERED TO INTENSE LEVELS THAT THEY THEN STRUGGLE TO SHAKE OFF IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE PRACTICED ANGER EITHER BY SELF OR PROVOCATION BY OTHERS FOR SO LONG SO FREQUENTLY.
Not calling a spade a spade:
It is unlikely he is referring to my high standing when he said, “I have grave doubts about your high standing” but it is likely that he was too pretentious to say directly “I have grave doubts about your being the counselor”.
There is actually forbidding emotional force in actors that they cannot surmount to not call a spade a spade but they must go about in a round about way that misleads the listener, indirectly causes doubt and uncertainty. Polite and soft spoken people might like to think they are paragons of virtue but they are dishonest sinners who are incapable, cannot call a spade a spade even if they wanted because the tremendous mental force of falsity in their minds that forbid them to do so and they do not realize will ultimately kill them and consign them to perdition.
The Five Hindrances:
What the Buddha says below implies that doubt and uncertainty is false because it is possible to exist without it.
"Furthermore, there is the person who has no doubt or perplexity (uncertainty), who has arrived at certainty about the Dhamma. When he comes down with a serious disease, the thought occurs to him, 'I have no doubt or perplexity. I have arrived at certainty with regard to the True Dhamma.' He does not grieve, is not tormented.
The Buddha spoke of the five hindrances to awakening which is the only awakening out of suffering and doubt and uncertainty is one of them.
Sloth (laziness) and torpor (languidness) are not natural states but conditioned states that detain a person in this world of suffering and can and must be abandoned like restlessness can be abandoned but they are so strong in ordinary people they prefer to sleep or while away time instead of meditating attentively.
Anyone who is wracked by doubt and uncertainty and beset by stress, restlessness and distraction that he is constantly struggling to suppress and control, has little to look forward to and much to forget or drown in sorrow and he therefore sinks into apathetic sloth and torpor.
(Abandoning the Five Hindrances)
"Endowed with virtue, restraint over the senses, mindfulness and alertness, contentment, he seeks out a secluded dwelling. After his meal, he sits down, crosses his legs, holds his body erect, and brings mindfulness to the fore. (Without being endowed with true virtue, true restraint of the senses, attentiveness and alertness and contentment, it may be not very fruitful meditating)
"Abandoning covetousness, he dwells with an awareness devoid of covetousness. Abandoning ill will and anger, he dwells with awareness devoid of ill will. He cleanses his mind of ill will and anger. Abandoning sloth and torpor, he dwells with awareness devoid of sloth and torpor. Abandoning restlessness and anxiety, he dwells undisturbed, his mind inwardly stilled. Abandoning uncertainty, he dwells with no perplexity with regard to skillful mental qualities.
"Now suppose that a man is imprisoned. Later, he is released, safe and sound. The thought would occur to him, 'Before, I was bound in prison. Now I am released from that bondage.' Thus he would experience happiness.
"Now suppose that a man is a slave. As time passes, he eventually is released from that slavery, able to go where he likes. He would experience joy and happiness.
"In the same way, when these five hindrances are not abandoned, the monk regards it as a sickness, a prison. But when these five hindrances are abandoned, he regards it as release from prison, freedom. He becomes glad, enraptured. His body grows tranquil.