Quote: Archbishop Desmond Tutu has become the patron of South Africa's Barbecue (Braai) Day, saying the pastime is a unifying force in a divided country.
Comment: A pastime can only be an unifying activity not unifying force and if you think barbecues have force in them you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
You could say it is a slip of the tongue but people who are actors operating from a mental jukebox are under constant pressure from themselves and others to quickly say things to please and impress others and as they grow old, they become incontinent, they grasp at the wrong but favourite jukebox phrases (emotional people like to use ‘force’) that come to mind and thus begin to speak oddly. They are actually heading for final loss of control and mad inappropriate jukebox speech that they and fellow jukebox operators cannot believe will occur.
Quote: "This is something that can unite us. It is so proudly South African, so uniquely South African," he said. (He implies that the pride and uniqueness is unquantifiable. Unique means no peers so how can it be so unique except in his advanced false perception that will end in mad perception. He is a very emotional man. One should not make much of an activity celebrating eating for there cannot be much good coming out of feasting)
'Wonderful institution'
"There are so many things that are pulling us apart, this has a wonderful potential to bring us all together," Archbishop Tutu told reporters on Wednesday. (again emotional, there are many things pulling us apart suffices)
"We've shown the world a few things. Let's show them that ordinary activities like eating can unite people of different races, religions, sexes... short people, tall people, fat people, lean people," he added. (Exactly what things eating can unite, whether they are wholesome or harmful, whether people attend these functions because they are seeking food that perishes or food that does not perish may be known. If you uphold and recommend such activities then you may be upholding detention in this world)
Comment: A pastime can only be an unifying activity not unifying force and if you think barbecues have force in them you have false perception that will end in mad perception.
You could say it is a slip of the tongue but people who are actors operating from a mental jukebox are under constant pressure from themselves and others to quickly say things to please and impress others and as they grow old, they become incontinent, they grasp at the wrong but favourite jukebox phrases (emotional people like to use ‘force’) that come to mind and thus begin to speak oddly. They are actually heading for final loss of control and mad inappropriate jukebox speech that they and fellow jukebox operators cannot believe will occur.
Quote: "This is something that can unite us. It is so proudly South African, so uniquely South African," he said. (He implies that the pride and uniqueness is unquantifiable. Unique means no peers so how can it be so unique except in his advanced false perception that will end in mad perception. He is a very emotional man. One should not make much of an activity celebrating eating for there cannot be much good coming out of feasting)
'Wonderful institution'
"There are so many things that are pulling us apart, this has a wonderful potential to bring us all together," Archbishop Tutu told reporters on Wednesday. (again emotional, there are many things pulling us apart suffices)
"We've shown the world a few things. Let's show them that ordinary activities like eating can unite people of different races, religions, sexes... short people, tall people, fat people, lean people," he added. (Exactly what things eating can unite, whether they are wholesome or harmful, whether people attend these functions because they are seeking food that perishes or food that does not perish may be known. If you uphold and recommend such activities then you may be upholding detention in this world)
Police framed two policemen?
Whilst it is not beyond the realms of possibility for the police to frame people the circumstances of the case and the fact that these two are also policemen makes it preposterous as a defence.
The police had no interest in Altanturya and she had not committed any crime and it was these two policemen who unlawfully brought her back to police headquarters so that fellow policemen do not need to be geniuses to work out what the two were going to do to her. If the chief inspector approached the vehicle that carried Altanturya on her last journey without knowing who was the driver then he deserves to die for his carelessness because by arresting her unlawfully he is responsible for what happens to her in custody.
Apart from these two who brought her to the police station who amongst the police would have interest to do away with her? If this was so they must have done it on the spur of the moment without preparation like securing the explosives.
SUCH REASONING WILL TELL YOU WHY THESE TWO POLICEMEN DID IT BUT HUMAN COURTS OF LAW ARE NOT ABOUT APPLYING REASON BUT ‘APPLYING DUE PROCESSES OF THE LAW’ WHATEVER THAT MEANS.
Even the two policemen had to do prep work:
Even these two accused policemen had to do prep work like visiting her at her hotel and were supplied with information about her so if it wasn’t these two who did it then the unknown policemen who did it must be very lucky and daring to carry out the task successfully without preparation at very short notice on the same night she was brought in.
It is highly unlikely that other policemen were secretly in the background shadowing her and assuming that other policemen did it, they must decide at very short notice from the moment she was brought back to headquarters prepare, eg get the explosives and decide where to get rid of her.
Not the look of an honest harmless person:
Whilst it is not beyond the realms of possibility for the police to frame people the circumstances of the case and the fact that these two are also policemen makes it preposterous as a defence.
The police had no interest in Altanturya and she had not committed any crime and it was these two policemen who unlawfully brought her back to police headquarters so that fellow policemen do not need to be geniuses to work out what the two were going to do to her. If the chief inspector approached the vehicle that carried Altanturya on her last journey without knowing who was the driver then he deserves to die for his carelessness because by arresting her unlawfully he is responsible for what happens to her in custody.
Apart from these two who brought her to the police station who amongst the police would have interest to do away with her? If this was so they must have done it on the spur of the moment without preparation like securing the explosives.
SUCH REASONING WILL TELL YOU WHY THESE TWO POLICEMEN DID IT BUT HUMAN COURTS OF LAW ARE NOT ABOUT APPLYING REASON BUT ‘APPLYING DUE PROCESSES OF THE LAW’ WHATEVER THAT MEANS.
Even the two policemen had to do prep work:
Even these two accused policemen had to do prep work like visiting her at her hotel and were supplied with information about her so if it wasn’t these two who did it then the unknown policemen who did it must be very lucky and daring to carry out the task successfully without preparation at very short notice on the same night she was brought in.
It is highly unlikely that other policemen were secretly in the background shadowing her and assuming that other policemen did it, they must decide at very short notice from the moment she was brought back to headquarters prepare, eg get the explosives and decide where to get rid of her.
Not the look of an honest harmless person:
Even if it turns out she did not kill her daughter in the much publicized case with British newspapers offering even millions of dollars for information as to her daughter’s disappearance, this is not the look of an honest person but the look of a tough, dishonest person who can be ruthless and can blow up in a fit of rage.
It is said the singer Johnny Cash used to trash up hotel rooms where he stayed with a chainsaw he carried in his car and would overload himself with all kinds of drugs and often by himself he would stare motionless for hours or sink into depression and he would engage in slanging matches with his wife June Carter whom he professed he loved so much.
Thus the private lives of many people who are supposed to be respectable; who are rich and famous and therefore should be enjoying their lives here to the utmost is far from savoury but even tormented to suicidal and homicidal levels.
The consciousness changes is a wonderful rare opportunity to escape this world of torment leading to more everlasting torment but most will foolishly let it slip past.
The trouble a mouse can cause:
Nobody likes trouble and it can happen anytime and demands effort and reasoning to rectify. Recently my Dell USB mouse which is probably still under warranty started to play up suddenly and it took me a couple of days and much trouble to finally identify it as the source of my troubles.
I noticed that when I clicked to select a batch of files to transfer out, the computer would rapidly open up each file, when I clicked on a file it will open up by itself and when I clicked on a cell in Excel it sometimes would start flashing ready for data entry and most disconcerting when I clicked the Office Button on both Excel & Word to open files the program would just disappear so that I have to re-launch Excel or Word again.
I thought I had picked up a virus on the internet because recently I was confronted with a message that my Windows was not functioning optimal and I should boost my performance by installing this software (I was visiting an Australian news website) and no matter how I refuse to accept the invitation the explorer window would not close.
So not believing the mouse which is a few months old could be the problem, I tried system restore a couple of times to no avail. Most people will give up or resigned to live with this considerable nuisance (often asking Dell for help is no help) but I thought perhaps I should try swapping the mouse of the home Dell to see if it helped. I did not expect it to be the cause but swapping the mouse cured the computer of the problem.
IT MAY JUST BE A PROBLEM WITH THE USB OPTICAL MOUSE BUT IF YOUR COMPUTER STARTS TO BEHAVE ODDLY WITH THE POINTER JUMPING ODDLY THROUH THE PLACES, THEN IT MAY BE SIMPLY THE MOUSE THAT IS MALFUNCTIONING.
What you ought to say:
Jesus said that in that hour the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say.
Why just the Holy Spirit and not God or Jesus or the angels who will teach you what you ought to say? It may be that this world and the heavenly worlds are mutually exclusive and God, Jesus after he departed has no communication with this world and bearing in mind that Jesus said the counsellor is the Holy Spirit, it may be that the Holy Spirit will be physically present in this world and he will teach you what you ought to say.
That Jesus said the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say implies that it is not everything goes but there are things that you ought to say and things you ought not to say. If you know what you ought to say or there will be others apart from him amongst humans who can and will teach you what you ought to say then there should be no need for the Holy Spirit to teach you and thus it is only because you do not know what you ought to say and no one else can and will teach what you ought to say that the Holy Spirit has to teach you so.
This implies that what the Holy Spirit will teach you must be different from all the others who will teach you what you ought to say. If what the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say is not distinct, it has similarities with what the pope, priest, Dalai Lama or psychiatrist will say then it is false to say the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say.
That Jesus said the Holy Spirit in that hour will teach you what you ought to say indicates that Jesus did not teach you what you ought to say, not at least comprehensively and therefore it is not because of discrimination that speaking against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven but speaking against Jesus will be forgiven but it is because of the nature of what the Holy Spirit will speak that differs from all that went before that will make it unforgivable if you oppose him or what he says.
If it is true as I say (and absolutely nobody has said this in the past) that there is constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in the speech of everyone here and it is the only source of the stress, restlessness and distraction that they suffer from and with which they persecute all others who come into contact with them, then if you spurn what I say by upholding style which is essentially stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you are upholding this world and will not be forgiven but shall be detained in this world.
***
Possibly they wanted to kill her so that a male child can be then conceived but it reflects how deluded and wicked beings in this world are.
If you are recalcitrant, you think life here is not too bad despite its many drawbacks you will be doomed to return here for more even for another eternity building a pile of skeleton that the Buddha said is as high as a mountain.
Chinese woman's 'needle ordeal'
The needles were revealed by hospital X-rays
It is said the singer Johnny Cash used to trash up hotel rooms where he stayed with a chainsaw he carried in his car and would overload himself with all kinds of drugs and often by himself he would stare motionless for hours or sink into depression and he would engage in slanging matches with his wife June Carter whom he professed he loved so much.
Thus the private lives of many people who are supposed to be respectable; who are rich and famous and therefore should be enjoying their lives here to the utmost is far from savoury but even tormented to suicidal and homicidal levels.
The consciousness changes is a wonderful rare opportunity to escape this world of torment leading to more everlasting torment but most will foolishly let it slip past.
The trouble a mouse can cause:
Nobody likes trouble and it can happen anytime and demands effort and reasoning to rectify. Recently my Dell USB mouse which is probably still under warranty started to play up suddenly and it took me a couple of days and much trouble to finally identify it as the source of my troubles.
I noticed that when I clicked to select a batch of files to transfer out, the computer would rapidly open up each file, when I clicked on a file it will open up by itself and when I clicked on a cell in Excel it sometimes would start flashing ready for data entry and most disconcerting when I clicked the Office Button on both Excel & Word to open files the program would just disappear so that I have to re-launch Excel or Word again.
I thought I had picked up a virus on the internet because recently I was confronted with a message that my Windows was not functioning optimal and I should boost my performance by installing this software (I was visiting an Australian news website) and no matter how I refuse to accept the invitation the explorer window would not close.
So not believing the mouse which is a few months old could be the problem, I tried system restore a couple of times to no avail. Most people will give up or resigned to live with this considerable nuisance (often asking Dell for help is no help) but I thought perhaps I should try swapping the mouse of the home Dell to see if it helped. I did not expect it to be the cause but swapping the mouse cured the computer of the problem.
IT MAY JUST BE A PROBLEM WITH THE USB OPTICAL MOUSE BUT IF YOUR COMPUTER STARTS TO BEHAVE ODDLY WITH THE POINTER JUMPING ODDLY THROUH THE PLACES, THEN IT MAY BE SIMPLY THE MOUSE THAT IS MALFUNCTIONING.
What you ought to say:
Jesus said that in that hour the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say.
Why just the Holy Spirit and not God or Jesus or the angels who will teach you what you ought to say? It may be that this world and the heavenly worlds are mutually exclusive and God, Jesus after he departed has no communication with this world and bearing in mind that Jesus said the counsellor is the Holy Spirit, it may be that the Holy Spirit will be physically present in this world and he will teach you what you ought to say.
That Jesus said the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say implies that it is not everything goes but there are things that you ought to say and things you ought not to say. If you know what you ought to say or there will be others apart from him amongst humans who can and will teach you what you ought to say then there should be no need for the Holy Spirit to teach you and thus it is only because you do not know what you ought to say and no one else can and will teach what you ought to say that the Holy Spirit has to teach you so.
This implies that what the Holy Spirit will teach you must be different from all the others who will teach you what you ought to say. If what the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say is not distinct, it has similarities with what the pope, priest, Dalai Lama or psychiatrist will say then it is false to say the Holy Spirit will teach you what you ought to say.
That Jesus said the Holy Spirit in that hour will teach you what you ought to say indicates that Jesus did not teach you what you ought to say, not at least comprehensively and therefore it is not because of discrimination that speaking against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven but speaking against Jesus will be forgiven but it is because of the nature of what the Holy Spirit will speak that differs from all that went before that will make it unforgivable if you oppose him or what he says.
If it is true as I say (and absolutely nobody has said this in the past) that there is constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in the speech of everyone here and it is the only source of the stress, restlessness and distraction that they suffer from and with which they persecute all others who come into contact with them, then if you spurn what I say by upholding style which is essentially stretching syllables, changing speed and loudness you are upholding this world and will not be forgiven but shall be detained in this world.
***
Possibly they wanted to kill her so that a male child can be then conceived but it reflects how deluded and wicked beings in this world are.
If you are recalcitrant, you think life here is not too bad despite its many drawbacks you will be doomed to return here for more even for another eternity building a pile of skeleton that the Buddha said is as high as a mountain.
Chinese woman's 'needle ordeal'
The needles were revealed by hospital X-rays
Doctors in China have discovered 26 sewing needles embedded in the body of a 31-year-old woman.
They think they were inserted into Luo Cuifen's body when she was a baby by grandparents upset she was not a boy.
Some of these needles have penetrated vital organs, such as the lungs, liver and kidneys. One has even broken into three pieces in the woman's brain.
The needles were discovered only when Ms Luo went to hospital complaining of blood in her urine.
She was given a routine X-ray, which revealed the needles. Up until then she had been in good health.
Operations needed
A team of 23 doctors, including five from the United States and Canada, are debating how best to remove the needles at the Richland International Hospital in Kunming, the capital of Yunnan province.
Xu Mei, the chief doctor at the hospital, told the BBC that removing the needles would be a long, complicated procedure requiring several operations.
The first of those is expected to take place next week when seven needles will be removed.
The hospital is doing the first operation, which will cost 170,000 yuan ($22,500, £11,200), for free.
But Ms Luo, from rural Songming County in Yunnan Province, will have to raise money to fund the other operations.
Doctors believe the needles were inserted into the woman when she was just a few days old by her grandparents, whom they believe were disappointed that she was not a boy.
But there is no way to confirm this theory, as the grandparents are now dead.
In many rural areas boys were - and still are - valued more highly than girls. One reason is that they can carry on the family name.
They think they were inserted into Luo Cuifen's body when she was a baby by grandparents upset she was not a boy.
Some of these needles have penetrated vital organs, such as the lungs, liver and kidneys. One has even broken into three pieces in the woman's brain.
The needles were discovered only when Ms Luo went to hospital complaining of blood in her urine.
She was given a routine X-ray, which revealed the needles. Up until then she had been in good health.
Operations needed
A team of 23 doctors, including five from the United States and Canada, are debating how best to remove the needles at the Richland International Hospital in Kunming, the capital of Yunnan province.
Xu Mei, the chief doctor at the hospital, told the BBC that removing the needles would be a long, complicated procedure requiring several operations.
The first of those is expected to take place next week when seven needles will be removed.
The hospital is doing the first operation, which will cost 170,000 yuan ($22,500, £11,200), for free.
But Ms Luo, from rural Songming County in Yunnan Province, will have to raise money to fund the other operations.
Doctors believe the needles were inserted into the woman when she was just a few days old by her grandparents, whom they believe were disappointed that she was not a boy.
But there is no way to confirm this theory, as the grandparents are now dead.
In many rural areas boys were - and still are - valued more highly than girls. One reason is that they can carry on the family name.
Arctic ice melting eight times faster:
Mankind’s best science and computers have seriously underestimated the rate of Arctic ice melting because what was projected then to occur in 2002 to occur in 2040 (38 years time) has now occurred in 5 years and scientists say what is projected to occur in 2050 (another 10 years) may occur next year.
In other words mankind’s worst projections far underestimate (almost eight times) the true rate of melting and it is accelerating (another ten years melting to 2050) may occur in just one year.
Not only will the sea level be rising much faster than projected affecting even major coastal cities (London, Singapore, New York) but the shifting ice has destabilized the underlying tectonic plates causing earthquakes in polar areas that may have a knockout effect on all the earth’s tectonic plates so that the scenario of earthquakes in many places as Jesus described is fulfilled.
The end may come far faster than humans concede.
YOU MAY THINK MANKIND IS TOO SMART TO BE CAUGHT BY ANY SURPRISE AND HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON BUT HE MAY BE BLIND OR CLUELESS ABOUT HOW GRAVE THE SITUATION WITH ENVIRONMENTAL INSTABILITY IS AS HE IS ABOUT THE AT THE MOMENT UNRAVELING FINANCIAL MARKETS WHICH MAY BE LIKE A MASSIVELY OVERLEVERAGED PYRAMID OF CARD NOW TOTTERING ON COLLAPSE.
Shockwaves from melting icecaps are triggering earthquakes, say scientists
By Daniel Howden, in Ilulissat, Greenland
The melting of Greenland's ice sheet has accelerated so dramatically that it is triggering earthquakes for the first time.
Movements of gigantic pieces of ice are creating shockwaves that register up to three on the Richter scale.
The UN report issued earlier this year is now thought to be out of date by its own authors.
The American polar expert Robert Correll described the acceleration as "massive".
Estimates of the likely rise in sea levels this century vary between 20cm-60cm. New data collected since the IPCC report suggested a rise closer to two metres.
Ilulissat is home to the most active glacier in Greenland and it was one of the immense icebergs that calve from it on a daily basis that is believed to have sunk the Titanic.
Greenland's ice cap is immense, the second largest in the world. The packed ice is up to two miles thick and its total collapse into the ocean would raise worldside sea levels by seven metres.
At the Ilulissat Icefjord, the advance of the glacier into the sea is now visible to the naked eye. "It's moving toward the sea at a rate of two metres an hour," said Professor Correll. "It's exuding like toothpaste."
One day's worth of the Ilulissat ice would provide enough fresh water to supply the largest cities in the world for a whole year.
As the glaciers thaw, pools of water are forming, feeding fractures in the ice, down which the water flows until it hits the bedrock.
"These so-called moulins are phenomenal," said Professor Correll, who said they had been remarkably scarce when he first visited the glacier in 1968. "Now they are like rivers 10 or 15 metres in diameter and there are thousands of them."
He compared the process to putting oil underneath the ice to make it move forward faster.
As the reality of the unprecedented thaw becomes apparent, the consequences are outstripping the capacity of scientific models to predict it.
Earthquakes, or glacial ice quakes, in the north-west of Greenland are among the latest ominous signs that an unprecedented step change is under way.
"Glacial earthquakes in north-west Greenland did not exist until three years ago," he said.
"Five years ago we made models predicting how much ice would melt and when," said Mr Vallio. "Five years later we are already at the levels predicted for 2040, in a year's time we'll be at 2050."
In Alaska, earthquakes are rocking the seabed as tectonic plates – subdued for centuries by the weight of the glaciers on top of them – are now moving against each other again.
No need to get emotional:
It is the false human perception that anger when questioned is a sign of innocence when it is a sign of guilt. Because anger is perceived (falsely) as reflecting innocence, many goats have long ‘learnt’ (actually copied) how to fabricate anger that may be real or faked that they are outraged by the allegations when deep down surely they know they are guilty as charged.
Emotion has nothing to do with a person’s innocence but it is merely expressed to impress others that they are innocent or to intimidate others that they must accept the person is innocent.
Madeleine’s parents may not have accidentally killed their daughters as alleged (there are allegations that they regularly sedated their children to go out partying, there was conflict between the two and one of them had a raging tendency) but you can see how wicked and without conscience some people can be if it turns out to be true that after killing their daughter accidentally they felt no compunction to publicly take account for their actions but undertook elaborate actions to hide what truly happened that caused great trouble to many people and may have wrongly convicted another person.
Did you kill your daughter?
Mr and Mrs McCann have long been aware that they were the subject of rumour and suspicion but this is the first time the police have put it to them. Her friends and family cannot believe that the "imbecile" police have the nerve even to ask it.
Comment: Parents do kill their children either deliberately in a rage or by accident and then to escape the responsibility by telling lies so there is no need to label police imbecilic for asking the question. It reflects the person's ill will and advanced false perception that insult is an appropriate response to the police's question and she is headed for future mad perception.
Those who think that given the circumstances, such emotion charged reactions are understandable have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb because calling the police imbeciles is not understandable.
IF YOU THINK IT IS IMBECILIC FOR THE POLICE TO ASK THAT QUESTION WHEN IT IS FULLY JUSTIFIABLE GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, YOU ARE FORCEFULLY ADVOCATING FALSE PERCEPTION AND LOGIC THAT WILL END IN YOUR FINAL MADNESS YOU DO NOT BELIEVE. WHATEVER IT IS, POLICE HAS THE RIGHT AND DUTY TO ASK THAT.
Tell us what you did with her...
Mrs McCann was asked this directly, according to her husband's sister Philomena. Her reply was said to be: "You must be insane to think we'd put ourselves through this."
Comment: Again it is unnecessary and inappropriate reaction to a question that leads to future mad perception and reaction because the correct reply to that question is a calm “I did not do anything”. Why should you be upset if you know you are not guilty? No amount of anger or hurling abuse will prove you are innocent and it is the common human false perception that ends in mad perception that if a person reacts to a question angrily he must be innocent.
Mrs McCann had been asked to explain traces of her daughter's blood allegedly found in the family's hired Renault Scenic car.
A friend revealed that the 39-year-old GP shook with rage and replied: "How dare you? How dare you use emotional blackmail to make me confess something I didn't do?"
Comment: The more emotional a person becomes the more irrational he becomes and it reflects her irrationality to accuse police of emotional blackmail which is just an excuse or convenient vehicle to attack the person whom she perceived as her tormentors. It is possible the police may be unfairly exerting psychological pressures on her (intimidation) to confess but I cannot see the police using emotional blackmail to get her to confess.
When you blackmail someone you unlawfully threaten someone with some form of action if he does not do what you want. If the police has a valid case against her and offered her a light sentence in return for a confession that is not blackmail but a concessionary offer to end the case quickly.
Asked how her husband was taking this situation, the friend replied: "How do you think a red-blooded Scottish male would react when defending the honour of his wife?"
Comment: That is not a let your yes be yes rational answer to a question but it reflects emotional outrage and sinful to tell others to revert to stereotype to imagine her husband's behaviour when it is presumptuous and dangerously flirting with false perception.
Pregnant with style:
Friend: Dr Fiona Payne was also at the tapas bar
She is walking but not paying attention to her walking that has a style that can be described as a causal provocative or cocky swagger like a female gunslinger which is not surprising considering she is a doctor and may be proud of her profession and trying to project it in the way she walks in her place of work that then becomes her default way of walking.
She has square or broad shoulders that may not be natural but the result of chronic propping forwards and outwards of her shoulders to make her look more impressive or domineering that she actually is such that it is now involuntary.
Selective blindness:
The irony that is lost on denizens of this world is that they can see the style in others in the ways they speak and do things and what they say or do that they dislike but may fake they like, they can even see style in me who has no style and they do not like my ‘style’ which is an absence of style but they can never see that they themselves too are owners of equally valid styles that others similarly find disagreeable but only fake they like to get along or obtain selfish objectives.
The reason is because they are robots who are programmed to see style in others and will therefore perceive style even in the absence of style (eg they read what I write with stretching, changing speed and loudness and perceive that is how I will speak it), they have programmed themselves to perceive the style in themselves but only to admire how genuinely charming they are, not how falsely stylish and similarly disagreeable it may be to others.
Oh My Gawd:
She is walking but not paying attention to her walking that has a style that can be described as a causal provocative or cocky swagger like a female gunslinger which is not surprising considering she is a doctor and may be proud of her profession and trying to project it in the way she walks in her place of work that then becomes her default way of walking.
She has square or broad shoulders that may not be natural but the result of chronic propping forwards and outwards of her shoulders to make her look more impressive or domineering that she actually is such that it is now involuntary.
Selective blindness:
The irony that is lost on denizens of this world is that they can see the style in others in the ways they speak and do things and what they say or do that they dislike but may fake they like, they can even see style in me who has no style and they do not like my ‘style’ which is an absence of style but they can never see that they themselves too are owners of equally valid styles that others similarly find disagreeable but only fake they like to get along or obtain selfish objectives.
The reason is because they are robots who are programmed to see style in others and will therefore perceive style even in the absence of style (eg they read what I write with stretching, changing speed and loudness and perceive that is how I will speak it), they have programmed themselves to perceive the style in themselves but only to admire how genuinely charming they are, not how falsely stylish and similarly disagreeable it may be to others.
Oh My Gawd:
It is likely if not certain the person who uttered “Oh My Gawd” believes what he said is based on reason when what he said is based on dislike which is nothing more than a mindless stirring in speed and strength of his mental force of going against self at the sight above out of control of his force of self preservation that he cannot help because he is an opinionated man of strong likes and dislikes that is heading for torment not heaven.
What has his God got to do with this? Is he trying to attract the attention of his God to this? If everything is so terrible to you (so disliking to you), then you are conditioning yourself to mad terribleness when every minor thing that occurs to you is ‘Oh My Gawd”. Gawd is a perversion of “god” and comes about only by the way he stretches and changes speed and loudness of his syllables.
The picture above does not offend me nor titillate me, she is actually suffering, sinking inexorably into deeper madness and you are cruel not good to spite her so that if she reads it she may become more hurt or defiant.
What is the motive?
McCanns: 'We have nothing to do with our lovely daughter vanishing'
It suffices to say we have nothing to do with our daughter’s vanishing but it either reflects that they are people who like to exaggerate or add more that according to Jesus comes from evil and it is intended to convey that because they consider their daughter lovely they could not have killed her and therefore you should rally to support them as innocent.
THE USE OF ‘LOVELY’ COULD BE DUE TO THEIR NEED AS IN ALL STYLISH PEOPLE TO ALWAYS SPRINKLE ADJECTIVES LIBERALLY IN EVERYTHING THEY SAY TO IMPRESS OTHERS OR IT MAY BE CALCULATED TO FALSELY IMPRESS OTHERS THAT BECAUSE THEY DESCRIBE THEIR DAUGHTER AS LOVELY IT IS INCONTEMPLATIBLE THAT THEY KILLED HER.
Technically a lie:
The statement we have nothing to do with our lovely daughter’s vanishing is technically a lie because as parents they at least were negligent to some extent in leaving her alone at night whilst they entertained friends even with alcohol (they disputed the amount consumed that was alleged to be much more).
It is true that I have nothing to do with her disappearance but as parents they have at least some direct or indirect connection to her disappearance.
So why are they resorting to such categorically uncompromising language except to drive home (with force never reason) their alleged innocence.
She is not innocent:
What has his God got to do with this? Is he trying to attract the attention of his God to this? If everything is so terrible to you (so disliking to you), then you are conditioning yourself to mad terribleness when every minor thing that occurs to you is ‘Oh My Gawd”. Gawd is a perversion of “god” and comes about only by the way he stretches and changes speed and loudness of his syllables.
The picture above does not offend me nor titillate me, she is actually suffering, sinking inexorably into deeper madness and you are cruel not good to spite her so that if she reads it she may become more hurt or defiant.
What is the motive?
McCanns: 'We have nothing to do with our lovely daughter vanishing'
It suffices to say we have nothing to do with our daughter’s vanishing but it either reflects that they are people who like to exaggerate or add more that according to Jesus comes from evil and it is intended to convey that because they consider their daughter lovely they could not have killed her and therefore you should rally to support them as innocent.
THE USE OF ‘LOVELY’ COULD BE DUE TO THEIR NEED AS IN ALL STYLISH PEOPLE TO ALWAYS SPRINKLE ADJECTIVES LIBERALLY IN EVERYTHING THEY SAY TO IMPRESS OTHERS OR IT MAY BE CALCULATED TO FALSELY IMPRESS OTHERS THAT BECAUSE THEY DESCRIBE THEIR DAUGHTER AS LOVELY IT IS INCONTEMPLATIBLE THAT THEY KILLED HER.
Technically a lie:
The statement we have nothing to do with our lovely daughter’s vanishing is technically a lie because as parents they at least were negligent to some extent in leaving her alone at night whilst they entertained friends even with alcohol (they disputed the amount consumed that was alleged to be much more).
It is true that I have nothing to do with her disappearance but as parents they have at least some direct or indirect connection to her disappearance.
So why are they resorting to such categorically uncompromising language except to drive home (with force never reason) their alleged innocence.
She is not innocent:
This is the picture of the missing girl at the centre of the British press obsession.
Although people routinely label children as cute little angels there are adults who detest children and call them little devils and they have a point there.
Exactly what is the nature of a person, in this case a child may be known objectively and it is not subjective that she can be an angel to one and a devil to another.
Her true nature is visible from her appearance and the fact that you say you cannot ascertain or you think she is a cute ‘lovely’ reflects your lack of discernment or ability to see things clearly as they are if it turns out you are wrong.
I say whatever happened to her, she is not innocent. She has a mischievous false smile, there is added force in her stare and she is capable of aggression.
Beings are in this world seldom if ever for a minor isolated blemish but usually if not always for a fundamental flaw in their natures that can be truly labelled ‘so’ hard to correct because the Buddha said you have already spilt your own blood greater than the four great oceans from having your head chopped off as humans and animals and yet you are still entranced by this world, you tick me off by saying you smile because you like someone.
You may say you don’t care whether she is good or bad, whether she deserved her fate or not but when your head is on the chopping block then you will care too late that you did not care.
“They have taken her”:
It was purported Mrs McCann broke the news of her daughter’s disappearance to her friends with the words “They have taken her” that the police subsequently confronted her with.
How would she know someone had taken her daughter? Even if she had been sedated, which they deny doing, she could have woken up and wandered off so how could she presume that she had been taken unless this is what they orchestrated and she foolishly forgot to pretend that she actually did not know what happened to her daughter.
There are no perfect crimes or lies partly because only fools who do not know what is in store for them will tell lies or commit crimes they think they can hide from others. Thus a person who is discerning can see cracks in what story that is concocted whilst the foolish are somnolent or clueless.
A substantial reward for telling lies is the challenge of perpetrating it and the thrill of getting away with it. Liars develop a taste for telling lies and get a kick from seeing others fall for their lies.
People sometimes say he has no reason to tell a lie implying that what he said must be true. You do not need reason to tell lies and if a person has true reason he would not tell lies but telling lies is addictive and it can become a mindless urge to tell lies and just to see others fall for your lies and getting away with it is reason enough to tell lies.
It would have been a faux pas if she had uttered “They have taken her away” just as it is a faux pas that eluded foolish Australian police that a lone gunman could have driven some km away the couple’s van and his own 4WD to commit the crime in the Falconio missing British tourist.
Don’t Understand & Misunderstand:
In any matter of teaching, the person can understand correctly, misunderstand or not understand at all.
To fail to understand or misunderstand are never natural conditions but the result of (emotional or disliking) blockage or false lines of thinking or perceiving.
There are many people in this world who are hard even impossible to teach, they either do not understand what you are trying to get at no matter how many times and different ways you try to explain or they misinterpret or misunderstand what you tell them.
THE REASONS THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY OR TEACH IS BECAUSE THERE IS A STRONG MENTAL BLOCK OR FORCE TO REFUSE TO COUNTENANCE OR ACCEPT WHAT IS SAID EG AS A RESULT OF HOSTILITY OR THEY HAVE BRAINWASHED THEMSELVES TO BELIEVE THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND CERTAIN THINGS. IN ADDITION BECAUSE THEY ARE ROBOTS, WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE THROUGH SIGHT AND SOUND TOO ARE PROGRAMMED AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES TO PERCEIVE THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.
THE REASON WHY PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE PROGRAMMED WAYS OF PERCEIVING AND REASONING OR INTERPRETING WHAT THEY PERCEIVE AND WHATEVER IS SAID TO THEM CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD BY THEM IN TERMS OF HOW THEY PROGRAM THEMSELVES TO UNDERSTAND AND THUS THEY ALWAYS MISINTERPRET WHAT IS SAID TO THEM TO SUIT THE ONLY WAY THEY KNOW OF HOW TO PERCEIVE THINGS.
For instance, it is not that what I say is false that there are constant forceful stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the speech of not just humans but animals and how these are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction they must regularly suffer from but what I say will fall on deaf ears in many cases and in those who bothered to read it, they are too distracted by their engrossment with affairs of the world to pay more than lip service, they cannot see or are unable to see a serious bulk of stretching, speed and loudness changes in their speech and how these demand the use of mental force and leads to the subsequent experience of stress, restlessness and distraction.
BECAUSE THEY ARE ROBOTS IN WHOM EVEN WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE ARE PREPROGRAMMED AND THEY CANNOT PERCIEVE WHAT THEY HAVE NOT PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES TO PERCEIVE, MANY WILL NOT UNDERSTAND OR MISUNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING OF THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST ASSAIL THEM, THEY ARE INCREASINGLY CONDITIONING THEM TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND WILL DESTROY THEIR MINDS. EVEN WHEN THEY FINALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY, IT TAKES EFFORT AND PERSISTENCE THAT THEY MAY NOT UNDERTAKE TO PAINSTAKINGLY RECTIFY THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY ARE FINE WHEN THEY ARE DOOMED TO MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD VIOLENCE, MAD EMOTIONS, MAD LOGIC & PERCEPTION.
IT IS NEVER NATURAL TO NOT UNDERSTAND OR MISUNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY, IT ALSO IS NOT BECAUSE WHAT I SAY MAKES NO SENSE BUT THAT WHAT I SAID IS NOT UNDERSTOOD OR MISUNDERSTOOD REFLECTS THE PERSON IS SERIOUSLY COMPROMISED (AND HEADED FOR DOOM), IT FALLS ON DEAF EARS OR SELECTIVELY DEAF OR PROGRAMMED EARS THAT ONLY WANT (YOU CAN ONLY WANT WITH FORCE NOT REASON) TO HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AND REFUSE (YOU CAN ONLY REFUSE WITH FORCE NOT REASON) TO HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AS A RESULT OF WHICH HE IS A BIASED OR PREJUDICED OPINIONATED PERSON.
A BIG HOAX:
It is a big hoax that ordinary people even those who are very intelligent are beings of reason who are openly receptive and treat whatever is presented to them according to their merits specific to the occasion as they are but the truth is that they are slaves of their mental forces, fixed in their ways, the way they see things and want to see things.
It is their mental force directly as their aggressiveness or assertiveness or secondarily as their likes (attraction for) and dislikes (repulsion for) and specifically as their emotions (excitement, thrill, lust, greed, hate, anger, derision) that is the drive to what they say or do, how they say or do it and because these are never live specific for the occasion but rehashed by rote from the past, they are like biological computers that can only process and ‘understand’ what it has been programmed to receive, process and then put out or output.
The only way for a person to see but not see, hear but not hear as Jesus described is for the person who behaves thus to be a biological robot who has been programmed by himself and society to see and hear certain things in certain ways and not see and hear certain things in certain ways and just as mechanical robots can never perceive (see and hear) what they have not been programmed to see and hear even when they are present to be seen and heard, in the same ways human robots cannot see and hear things that are present to be seen and heard (eg constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness) even though they are present to be seen and heard.
THUS BY SAYING THAT SEEING THEY DO NOT SEE, HEARING THEY DO NOT HEAR, JESUS IS IMPLYING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE ROBOTS IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE BUDDHA SAYS PEOPLE ARE ROBOTS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MINDFUL. IF YOU CAN SAY OR DO SOMETHING WITHOUT BEING MINDFUL, WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION IT MEANS IT MUST BE AUTOMATICALLY REGURGITATED AND YOU ARE THEREFORE A ROBOT.
IT IS BECAUSE ROBOTS DID NOT EXIST THEN AND YOU COULD NOT BEAR IT THEN BECAUSE OF CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA DID NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE AN OVERRATED ROBOT BUT NOW THAT CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED AND SOPHISTICATED CONSCIOUSLESS ROBOTS EXIST TO DEMONSTRATE HOW YOU DO NOT NEED ATTENTION TO BEHAVE IN THE STYLISH WAYS PEOPLE DO, IT HAS BECOME EVIDENT TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE MERELY SOPHISCATED BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS WITH A CONSCIOUSNESS THAT ACTS AS A VOYEUR AND DISC JOCKEY OF WHICH TUNE TO PLAY FOR THE MOMENT.
WOULD YOU TRY TO TEACH BY SPEAKING OR WRITING TO A ROBOT TO MAKE IT UNDERSTAND CERTAIN THINGS THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN PROGRAMMED TO UNDERSTAND LIKE THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING IN ITS SYLLABLES, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES? YOU MAY BE MAD TO DO SO. WHAT YOU NEED IS TO DIMANTLE THE ROBOT AND RE-PROGRAM IT TO PERCEIVE STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND REPROGRAM IT TO NOT STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
Mad & wasting time:
If a humanoid robot has not been programmed to detect and correct constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness that is programmed into its speech, you will be mad and wasting your time trying to teach it about the constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness present in its speech.
No matter how many times you tell and demonstrate to that robot it cannot understand what you are trying to get at and would continue nonetheless to stretch its syllables, change speed and loudness because that is the way it has been programmed to speak.
In the same way it may be futile to tell the vast majority of ordinary people that there are constant stretching of their syllables, changes of speed and loudness in their speech and how crucial these are because they are the sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them because they are not responsible for their behaviour but it is their software or pre-programmed ways that determine what and how they perceive, think, speak and do or not perceive, think, speak and do.
As a corollary, the fact that even those who are supposed to be good and intelligent continue to (helplessly) stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness after I have told them about it and even demonstrate to them how different speech without stretching, changes of speed and loudness is objective evidence they are robots not in control or mastery of their behaviour.
If you know what you are doing or saying and you are a master of what you say or do, why can’t you for once stop stretching syllables, stop changing speed and loudness even if you so desire to stretch, change speed and loudness?
I refuse to believe they killed Madeleine:
Quote columnist on reputable newspaper: I refuse to believe Madeleine’s parents killed her.
Comment: If the person did not feel she is justified or correct to say so, she would not have said so. She and most who read do not realize this is a statement of falsity that casts serious doubts on her credibility as a person of reason.
You never refuse with reason but you refuse with force or its derivatives dislike or anger or resentment or defiance to believe or accept as true what has happened.
Refusal has nothing to do with believing or not believing something because ideally, if you cannot know if something is true or not, you use reason to work out why you should or should not believe, you do not refuse to believe that is a form of blind categorical rejection.
If whether something is true or not is knowable eg the only possibility that a clump of Madeleine’s hair was found in the boot of the car her parents hired weeks after her disappearance has to be that they transported her body in the boot and therefore they killed her accidentally or otherwise, then it is not a matter of believing or not or whether you refuse to know or not.
The columnist gave the ‘reasons’ for not believing as the parents not only having lost a dear child but there is a large section of the world and police arrayed against them as having nastily killed their child. If you think these are valid reasons when they are irrational emotional strings pulling at her heart then she is a very mixed up lady who cannot tell what is fact and what is emotion.
YOU MUST NEVER REFUSE TO BELIEVE ANYTHING, YOU MUST NEVER USE FORCE TO NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE BUT YOU MUST ONLY USE CALM REASON TO DETERMINE IF YOU SHOULD ACCEPT AS TRUE OR NOT COMMIT YOURSELF. BECAUSE REFUSAL IS FORCEFUL IT IS ADDICTIVE AND YOU BECOME AN INCREASINGLY PARTIAL PERSON ONLY WANTING TO SEE AND HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AND HEADED FOR FINAL MAD PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS TRUE IS FALSE AND WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE. IF YOU SEE FOOD AS SHIT AND REFUSE TO EAT AND YOU SEE SHIT AS FOOD AND EAT IT, THEN YOUR FOLLY MAY BE FULFILLED.
Conduct a conversation with a humanoid robot dressed as a receptionist within the confines of what she has been programmed for eg where is the service department or who is the manager of the R & D dept and she will be able to reply in her stereotyped way with even a smile and gestures of her limbs the correct answer that you want but ask her about something she has not been programmed for eg what she ate for breakfast or her friends, she will be dumbfounded and might reply “Question invalid, please ask another question”.
In the same way, conduct a conversation with a person about everyday matters or within the field for which she has been trained to perform in, she would be able to give a convincing performance as if she is a real life specific to the occasion person but ask her or tell things beyond the bounds with which she has programmed herself or been programmed by her company to do, she may be all at sea and struggling to hide her discomfort or inability to understand and she may misunderstand what you are instructing her.
Always good to do something:
This statement that it is always good to do something (anything), which is a fairly common or hackneyed advice in human societies was spoken by an aging physician is false because it is the route to restlessness which is always suffering (therefore not good) wherein the person cannot keep still but must always find something to do to occupy him and bestows the person even deadly karma not merit as he deludes himself he does.
The statement contradicts what the Buddha advocated, namely cessation and noble silence if you have nothing meaningful to do or say. Thus the person who follows this physician’s advice must always find something to do (or say) to occupy himself, to distract himself even if he does not want to say or do anything and because this is forced, never reasoned he is strengthening the urge to be restless, to always find something to say or do, as is reflected in the behaviour of many in this world for those with eyes to see.
You do something because you want to do it to achieve something eg sweep the floor because it is dirty not because you are restless, you want to do something and sweeping is just a convenient activity to occupy yourself. If you sweep the floor just to do something you are practicing controlled insanity that will end with loss of control with uncontrollable insanity.
Willing & refusing to believe:
YOU NEVER USE FORCE TO WILL YOURSELF TO BELIEVE SOMETHING OR REFUSE TO BELIEVE SOMETHING BUT YOU USE CALM CLEAR FORCE FREE REASON OR THINKING (EMOTION IS NEVER THINKING) TO DECIDE OR DETERMINE WHETHER YOU CAN OR CANNOT BELIEVE SOMETHING AND IF YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT FACTS YOU CAN EVEN DECIDE WHETHER YOU KNOW OR DO NOT KNOW (NOT BELIEVE) WHETHER SOMETHING IS TRUE OR NOT. THUS TO SAY YOU REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE MCCANNS DID IT IS TO USE FORCE TO NOT BELIEVE WHAT YOU SHOULD USE REASON TO DETERMINE WHETHER YOU SHOULD BELIEVE OR NOT.
Depending on how much force you are willing to use you can force yourself to believe the most absurd things in the world or refuse to believe the simplest obvious things in the world but you are doomed for certain future madness because what is forced is always false and you are forcing yourself to believe falsity that will be consummated because in time you cannot see truth and see falsity as truth. Whatever that is true does not need force to accept as true nor force to refuse to accept as true and therefore the fact that you admit that you refuse or you will yourself to believe reflects your falsity.
FORCE IS THE INAPPROPRIATE TOOL FOR BELIEVING OR NOT BELIEVING SOMETHING. REASON IS THE APPROPRIATE TOOL.
Although people routinely label children as cute little angels there are adults who detest children and call them little devils and they have a point there.
Exactly what is the nature of a person, in this case a child may be known objectively and it is not subjective that she can be an angel to one and a devil to another.
Her true nature is visible from her appearance and the fact that you say you cannot ascertain or you think she is a cute ‘lovely’ reflects your lack of discernment or ability to see things clearly as they are if it turns out you are wrong.
I say whatever happened to her, she is not innocent. She has a mischievous false smile, there is added force in her stare and she is capable of aggression.
Beings are in this world seldom if ever for a minor isolated blemish but usually if not always for a fundamental flaw in their natures that can be truly labelled ‘so’ hard to correct because the Buddha said you have already spilt your own blood greater than the four great oceans from having your head chopped off as humans and animals and yet you are still entranced by this world, you tick me off by saying you smile because you like someone.
You may say you don’t care whether she is good or bad, whether she deserved her fate or not but when your head is on the chopping block then you will care too late that you did not care.
“They have taken her”:
It was purported Mrs McCann broke the news of her daughter’s disappearance to her friends with the words “They have taken her” that the police subsequently confronted her with.
How would she know someone had taken her daughter? Even if she had been sedated, which they deny doing, she could have woken up and wandered off so how could she presume that she had been taken unless this is what they orchestrated and she foolishly forgot to pretend that she actually did not know what happened to her daughter.
There are no perfect crimes or lies partly because only fools who do not know what is in store for them will tell lies or commit crimes they think they can hide from others. Thus a person who is discerning can see cracks in what story that is concocted whilst the foolish are somnolent or clueless.
A substantial reward for telling lies is the challenge of perpetrating it and the thrill of getting away with it. Liars develop a taste for telling lies and get a kick from seeing others fall for their lies.
People sometimes say he has no reason to tell a lie implying that what he said must be true. You do not need reason to tell lies and if a person has true reason he would not tell lies but telling lies is addictive and it can become a mindless urge to tell lies and just to see others fall for your lies and getting away with it is reason enough to tell lies.
It would have been a faux pas if she had uttered “They have taken her away” just as it is a faux pas that eluded foolish Australian police that a lone gunman could have driven some km away the couple’s van and his own 4WD to commit the crime in the Falconio missing British tourist.
Don’t Understand & Misunderstand:
In any matter of teaching, the person can understand correctly, misunderstand or not understand at all.
To fail to understand or misunderstand are never natural conditions but the result of (emotional or disliking) blockage or false lines of thinking or perceiving.
There are many people in this world who are hard even impossible to teach, they either do not understand what you are trying to get at no matter how many times and different ways you try to explain or they misinterpret or misunderstand what you tell them.
THE REASONS THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU SAY OR TEACH IS BECAUSE THERE IS A STRONG MENTAL BLOCK OR FORCE TO REFUSE TO COUNTENANCE OR ACCEPT WHAT IS SAID EG AS A RESULT OF HOSTILITY OR THEY HAVE BRAINWASHED THEMSELVES TO BELIEVE THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND CERTAIN THINGS. IN ADDITION BECAUSE THEY ARE ROBOTS, WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE THROUGH SIGHT AND SOUND TOO ARE PROGRAMMED AND WHAT THEY HAVE NOT PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES TO PERCEIVE THEY CANNOT UNDERSTAND.
THE REASON WHY PEOPLE MISUNDERSTAND IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE PROGRAMMED WAYS OF PERCEIVING AND REASONING OR INTERPRETING WHAT THEY PERCEIVE AND WHATEVER IS SAID TO THEM CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD BY THEM IN TERMS OF HOW THEY PROGRAM THEMSELVES TO UNDERSTAND AND THUS THEY ALWAYS MISINTERPRET WHAT IS SAID TO THEM TO SUIT THE ONLY WAY THEY KNOW OF HOW TO PERCEIVE THINGS.
For instance, it is not that what I say is false that there are constant forceful stretching of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the speech of not just humans but animals and how these are the only sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction they must regularly suffer from but what I say will fall on deaf ears in many cases and in those who bothered to read it, they are too distracted by their engrossment with affairs of the world to pay more than lip service, they cannot see or are unable to see a serious bulk of stretching, speed and loudness changes in their speech and how these demand the use of mental force and leads to the subsequent experience of stress, restlessness and distraction.
BECAUSE THEY ARE ROBOTS IN WHOM EVEN WHAT AND HOW THEY PERCEIVE ARE PREPROGRAMMED AND THEY CANNOT PERCIEVE WHAT THEY HAVE NOT PROGRAMMED THEMSELVES TO PERCEIVE, MANY WILL NOT UNDERSTAND OR MISUNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY THAT THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING OF THEIR SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IS THE ONLY SOURCE OF THE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT MUST ASSAIL THEM, THEY ARE INCREASINGLY CONDITIONING THEM TO STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND WILL DESTROY THEIR MINDS. EVEN WHEN THEY FINALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY, IT TAKES EFFORT AND PERSISTENCE THAT THEY MAY NOT UNDERTAKE TO PAINSTAKINGLY RECTIFY THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY ARE FINE WHEN THEY ARE DOOMED TO MAD STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION, MAD ROTE BEHAVIOR, MAD VIOLENCE, MAD EMOTIONS, MAD LOGIC & PERCEPTION.
IT IS NEVER NATURAL TO NOT UNDERSTAND OR MISUNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY, IT ALSO IS NOT BECAUSE WHAT I SAY MAKES NO SENSE BUT THAT WHAT I SAID IS NOT UNDERSTOOD OR MISUNDERSTOOD REFLECTS THE PERSON IS SERIOUSLY COMPROMISED (AND HEADED FOR DOOM), IT FALLS ON DEAF EARS OR SELECTIVELY DEAF OR PROGRAMMED EARS THAT ONLY WANT (YOU CAN ONLY WANT WITH FORCE NOT REASON) TO HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AND REFUSE (YOU CAN ONLY REFUSE WITH FORCE NOT REASON) TO HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AS A RESULT OF WHICH HE IS A BIASED OR PREJUDICED OPINIONATED PERSON.
A BIG HOAX:
It is a big hoax that ordinary people even those who are very intelligent are beings of reason who are openly receptive and treat whatever is presented to them according to their merits specific to the occasion as they are but the truth is that they are slaves of their mental forces, fixed in their ways, the way they see things and want to see things.
It is their mental force directly as their aggressiveness or assertiveness or secondarily as their likes (attraction for) and dislikes (repulsion for) and specifically as their emotions (excitement, thrill, lust, greed, hate, anger, derision) that is the drive to what they say or do, how they say or do it and because these are never live specific for the occasion but rehashed by rote from the past, they are like biological computers that can only process and ‘understand’ what it has been programmed to receive, process and then put out or output.
The only way for a person to see but not see, hear but not hear as Jesus described is for the person who behaves thus to be a biological robot who has been programmed by himself and society to see and hear certain things in certain ways and not see and hear certain things in certain ways and just as mechanical robots can never perceive (see and hear) what they have not been programmed to see and hear even when they are present to be seen and heard, in the same ways human robots cannot see and hear things that are present to be seen and heard (eg constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness) even though they are present to be seen and heard.
THUS BY SAYING THAT SEEING THEY DO NOT SEE, HEARING THEY DO NOT HEAR, JESUS IS IMPLYING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE ROBOTS IN THE SAME WAY THAT THE BUDDHA SAYS PEOPLE ARE ROBOTS BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MINDFUL. IF YOU CAN SAY OR DO SOMETHING WITHOUT BEING MINDFUL, WITHOUT PAYING ATTENTION IT MEANS IT MUST BE AUTOMATICALLY REGURGITATED AND YOU ARE THEREFORE A ROBOT.
IT IS BECAUSE ROBOTS DID NOT EXIST THEN AND YOU COULD NOT BEAR IT THEN BECAUSE OF CONSCIOUSNESS CONSTRAINTS THAT JESUS AND THE BUDDHA DID NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU ARE AN OVERRATED ROBOT BUT NOW THAT CONDITIONS HAVE CHANGED AND SOPHISTICATED CONSCIOUSLESS ROBOTS EXIST TO DEMONSTRATE HOW YOU DO NOT NEED ATTENTION TO BEHAVE IN THE STYLISH WAYS PEOPLE DO, IT HAS BECOME EVIDENT TO THOSE WHO ARE DISCERNING THAT ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE MERELY SOPHISCATED BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS WITH A CONSCIOUSNESS THAT ACTS AS A VOYEUR AND DISC JOCKEY OF WHICH TUNE TO PLAY FOR THE MOMENT.
WOULD YOU TRY TO TEACH BY SPEAKING OR WRITING TO A ROBOT TO MAKE IT UNDERSTAND CERTAIN THINGS THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN PROGRAMMED TO UNDERSTAND LIKE THERE IS CONSTANT STRETCHING IN ITS SYLLABLES, SPEED AND LOUDNESS CHANGES? YOU MAY BE MAD TO DO SO. WHAT YOU NEED IS TO DIMANTLE THE ROBOT AND RE-PROGRAM IT TO PERCEIVE STRETCHING, CHANGES IN SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND REPROGRAM IT TO NOT STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
Mad & wasting time:
If a humanoid robot has not been programmed to detect and correct constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness that is programmed into its speech, you will be mad and wasting your time trying to teach it about the constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness present in its speech.
No matter how many times you tell and demonstrate to that robot it cannot understand what you are trying to get at and would continue nonetheless to stretch its syllables, change speed and loudness because that is the way it has been programmed to speak.
In the same way it may be futile to tell the vast majority of ordinary people that there are constant stretching of their syllables, changes of speed and loudness in their speech and how crucial these are because they are the sources of the stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them because they are not responsible for their behaviour but it is their software or pre-programmed ways that determine what and how they perceive, think, speak and do or not perceive, think, speak and do.
As a corollary, the fact that even those who are supposed to be good and intelligent continue to (helplessly) stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness after I have told them about it and even demonstrate to them how different speech without stretching, changes of speed and loudness is objective evidence they are robots not in control or mastery of their behaviour.
If you know what you are doing or saying and you are a master of what you say or do, why can’t you for once stop stretching syllables, stop changing speed and loudness even if you so desire to stretch, change speed and loudness?
I refuse to believe they killed Madeleine:
Quote columnist on reputable newspaper: I refuse to believe Madeleine’s parents killed her.
Comment: If the person did not feel she is justified or correct to say so, she would not have said so. She and most who read do not realize this is a statement of falsity that casts serious doubts on her credibility as a person of reason.
You never refuse with reason but you refuse with force or its derivatives dislike or anger or resentment or defiance to believe or accept as true what has happened.
Refusal has nothing to do with believing or not believing something because ideally, if you cannot know if something is true or not, you use reason to work out why you should or should not believe, you do not refuse to believe that is a form of blind categorical rejection.
If whether something is true or not is knowable eg the only possibility that a clump of Madeleine’s hair was found in the boot of the car her parents hired weeks after her disappearance has to be that they transported her body in the boot and therefore they killed her accidentally or otherwise, then it is not a matter of believing or not or whether you refuse to know or not.
The columnist gave the ‘reasons’ for not believing as the parents not only having lost a dear child but there is a large section of the world and police arrayed against them as having nastily killed their child. If you think these are valid reasons when they are irrational emotional strings pulling at her heart then she is a very mixed up lady who cannot tell what is fact and what is emotion.
YOU MUST NEVER REFUSE TO BELIEVE ANYTHING, YOU MUST NEVER USE FORCE TO NOT ACCEPT AS TRUE BUT YOU MUST ONLY USE CALM REASON TO DETERMINE IF YOU SHOULD ACCEPT AS TRUE OR NOT COMMIT YOURSELF. BECAUSE REFUSAL IS FORCEFUL IT IS ADDICTIVE AND YOU BECOME AN INCREASINGLY PARTIAL PERSON ONLY WANTING TO SEE AND HEAR CERTAIN THINGS AND HEADED FOR FINAL MAD PERCEPTION OF WHAT IS TRUE IS FALSE AND WHAT IS FALSE IS TRUE. IF YOU SEE FOOD AS SHIT AND REFUSE TO EAT AND YOU SEE SHIT AS FOOD AND EAT IT, THEN YOUR FOLLY MAY BE FULFILLED.
Conduct a conversation with a humanoid robot dressed as a receptionist within the confines of what she has been programmed for eg where is the service department or who is the manager of the R & D dept and she will be able to reply in her stereotyped way with even a smile and gestures of her limbs the correct answer that you want but ask her about something she has not been programmed for eg what she ate for breakfast or her friends, she will be dumbfounded and might reply “Question invalid, please ask another question”.
In the same way, conduct a conversation with a person about everyday matters or within the field for which she has been trained to perform in, she would be able to give a convincing performance as if she is a real life specific to the occasion person but ask her or tell things beyond the bounds with which she has programmed herself or been programmed by her company to do, she may be all at sea and struggling to hide her discomfort or inability to understand and she may misunderstand what you are instructing her.
Always good to do something:
This statement that it is always good to do something (anything), which is a fairly common or hackneyed advice in human societies was spoken by an aging physician is false because it is the route to restlessness which is always suffering (therefore not good) wherein the person cannot keep still but must always find something to do to occupy him and bestows the person even deadly karma not merit as he deludes himself he does.
The statement contradicts what the Buddha advocated, namely cessation and noble silence if you have nothing meaningful to do or say. Thus the person who follows this physician’s advice must always find something to do (or say) to occupy himself, to distract himself even if he does not want to say or do anything and because this is forced, never reasoned he is strengthening the urge to be restless, to always find something to say or do, as is reflected in the behaviour of many in this world for those with eyes to see.
You do something because you want to do it to achieve something eg sweep the floor because it is dirty not because you are restless, you want to do something and sweeping is just a convenient activity to occupy yourself. If you sweep the floor just to do something you are practicing controlled insanity that will end with loss of control with uncontrollable insanity.
Willing & refusing to believe:
YOU NEVER USE FORCE TO WILL YOURSELF TO BELIEVE SOMETHING OR REFUSE TO BELIEVE SOMETHING BUT YOU USE CALM CLEAR FORCE FREE REASON OR THINKING (EMOTION IS NEVER THINKING) TO DECIDE OR DETERMINE WHETHER YOU CAN OR CANNOT BELIEVE SOMETHING AND IF YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT FACTS YOU CAN EVEN DECIDE WHETHER YOU KNOW OR DO NOT KNOW (NOT BELIEVE) WHETHER SOMETHING IS TRUE OR NOT. THUS TO SAY YOU REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE MCCANNS DID IT IS TO USE FORCE TO NOT BELIEVE WHAT YOU SHOULD USE REASON TO DETERMINE WHETHER YOU SHOULD BELIEVE OR NOT.
Depending on how much force you are willing to use you can force yourself to believe the most absurd things in the world or refuse to believe the simplest obvious things in the world but you are doomed for certain future madness because what is forced is always false and you are forcing yourself to believe falsity that will be consummated because in time you cannot see truth and see falsity as truth. Whatever that is true does not need force to accept as true nor force to refuse to accept as true and therefore the fact that you admit that you refuse or you will yourself to believe reflects your falsity.
FORCE IS THE INAPPROPRIATE TOOL FOR BELIEVING OR NOT BELIEVING SOMETHING. REASON IS THE APPROPRIATE TOOL.
No comments:
Post a Comment