Suffering From The Slience Of God

Quote Pope Benedict: Mother Theresa was suffering from the silence of God.
Comment: Notice the pope said suffer not enjoying the silence of God that implies the silence of God is causing Mother Theresa to suffer as it causes many, probably including the pope to suffer. Timidly or bravely he is suggesting or blaming the (baffling) silence of God for the suffering of many good people.

The pope and those who listen may think it is a statement made of goodwill 'gently' chiding God for ignoring His good servant Mother Theresa causing her to suffer anguish, doubt and uncertainty.
What the pope said is presumptuous, false, blames God and is an excuse. It incurs karma on him.
It is because the church has been prominent in touting her as a saint that publication of her private thoughts that casts serious doubts on the existence of God causes embarrassment that the church and the pope felt compelled to give an explanation why such an exemplary servant of God should entertain such depressing sentiments.
What the pope said implies Mother Theresa is a good lady even blameless and God is causing her to suffer by ignoring her.
God can punish a person but only because he is bad or has sinned. God cannot punish someone who is blameless because that would be mad. It is hard enough getting ordinary people to turn so that they will be cured, let alone punish those who have turned and are cured (blameless).
Thus by saying so the pope is saying it is not because Mother Theresa is in any way bad but she is suffering at the hands of a cantankerous God who has chosen to remain silent to her suffering. No matter how friendly this is said, it is blaming God without ascertaining from God that this is in fact so in danger of misleading others that this is the state of affairs when there are alternative viable explanations for what happened.
Why Mother Theresa Is A Hypocrite:
Quote Mother Theresa: “For me, the silence and the emptiness is so great, that I look and do not see, — Listen and do not hear — the tongue moves but does not speak.” “Such deep longing for God — and … repulsed — empty — no faith — no love — no zeal. — [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing.” “What do I labour for? If there be no God — there can be no soul —i f there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true.” (She is essentially expressing disillusionment with her religion and questioning its veracity)
“So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them —because of the blasphemy — If there be God — please forgive me — When I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven—there is such convicting emptiness that those very thoughts return like sharp knives and hurt my very soul. — I am told God loves me — and yet the reality of darkness and coldness and emptiness is so great that nothing touches my soul. Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly to the Call of the Sacred Heart?”
After receiving one of many international prizes, she wrote: “This means nothing to me, because I don’t have Him.” (She is admitting the absence of God in her)
Comment: It is never a sign of virtue but of pretence, self and other compromise or hypocrisy to harbour such negative private views that are the diametric opposite of what you espouse positively in public that are consciously or unconsciously intended to please and impress others. You are misleading others to follow your example that the way you behave is exemplary, brings peace and happiness when it brings darkness and suffering.
It is impossible for the Buddha to publicly speak highly of his enlightenment and in private voice doubts about his enlightenment and if it is impossible for him to contradict himself thus it must similarly be impossible for you contradict yourself unless you want to suffer as she surely was suffering. When the Buddha was beseeched by Ananda to reverse his decision to pass away in three months’ time, the Buddha said it is impossible for the Buddha to go back on his word (because that will make him a liar).
If you never followed what Jesus preached, not to smile (woe to you who laughs for you shall weep, a smile is laughter minus the sound and she admits to smiling), not to scold (even the man who calls his brother you fool is in danger of the fire of hell), to let your yes be yes only and not to be a hypocrite, might that not be reason why God has not come to you?

A major reason why many seek religion is because they are suffering and the reason they are suffering is never totally blameless even if others persecute them but because they are sinners and just because they have embraced religion and even devoted their lives towards causes of charity and good works does not mean that their hearts have turned. The numerous occurrences of sexual abuse of children and church members even by those who are at the highest echelons of the religious order is an indication that this is so.

Rather than a gentle woman, Mother Theresa may be a tough driven woman with strong self identity views out to prove herself, even make a name for herself and following the religious orthodoxy without understanding why, of going through the motions in acts of charity. There are suggestions that her treatment of the trodden may not be entirely benevolent.
It is impossible for a truly noble person to entertain and express the thoughts she expressed, if you think it is possible, you may be right or have wrong view that leads to hell or the animal womb according to the Buddha.
Only a person who is suffering severely from stress, restlessness and distraction can make such statements as Mother Theresa did. It is impossible for a person who does not suffer severely from stress, restlessness and distraction, as is possible, to suffer and thus driven by suffering to express doubt and uncertainty as to the existence of God. The only way a person can suffer severely from stress, restlessness and distraction is if he or she constantly stretches her syllables, changed speed and loudness or has style that is the root of her stress, restlessness and distraction and also at the root of her persecution of all who come into contact with her.
THUS, LIKE THE REST OF MANKIND, MOTHER THERESA MUST BE FORCEFULLY STRETCHING HER SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT GENERATES INSOLUBLE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN HER AND ALL THOSE WHO INTERACT WITH HER, SHE IS NOT BLAMELESS BUT BLAMEWORTHY, SHE MUST HATE HERSELF AS SHE MUST HATE OTHERS FOR SAYING AND DOING THINGS FOR SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, EVEN INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AND THIS IS AT THE HEART OF HER DOUBT AND UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE EXISTENCE OF GOD AND HER WORK.

Only a person who is suffering can utter the words that she did in private. And you can only suffer with force, with the proxies of force namely like and dislike and all the emotions, never reason. A person with true reason cannot suffer because true reason has no force that is required to suffer.
It reflects that she is a hypocrite who never expressed in public her thoughts that are the diametric opposite of what she publicly espouses.

And people, even those who call themselves good and smart may be more recalcitrant, not for turning than they think they are. For instance now that consciousness has changed twice in an unprecedented way and it has been declared that not to stretch syllables, change speed and loudness is the only way permanently effortlessly out of stress, restlessness and distraction that was previously unthinkable, even those who call themselves good continue to stretch their syllables, change speed and loudness and they even tick me off by saying they disagree with me.

Would you trouble yourself to talk to a robot? Whatever a robot perceives and says to you is preprogrammed and it cannot perceive anything and say anything that it was not programmed to perceive and say. If people are like I say programmed by themselves and society to perceive and say certain things, it may be a fruitless endeavor for God to converse with them.

The true worth of a saint is if he or she goes to heaven and a saint is worthless if he does not go to heaven. What is the use of electing a saint who does not go to heaven?
Do you or the church decide who goes to heaven or is it God? If you agree it is God then you should leave the matter of designating who is and is not a saint to God.

Jesus: "And I tell you, everyone who acknowledges me before men, the Son of man also will acknowledge before the angels of God; but he who denies me before men will be denied before the angels of God. And every one who speaks a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven. And when they bring you before the synagogues and the rulers and the authorities, do not be anxious how or what you are to answer or what you are to say; for the Holy Spirit will teach you in that very hour what you ought to say.

Comment: They have yet to bring you before the synagogues and the rulers and the authorities, but that is not to say that in the future when times are desperate and it is everyone for himself that this might not happen. Thus Jesus’ reference to the Holy Spirit teaching you what you ought to say (why just him and not others, the angels, Jesus or God?) is indication that the Holy Spirit will come and He will dwell amongst you and he will teach you what you ought to say.

Can a voice in many people’s minds teach them what they ought to say? Whilst there are some who are easy to teach there are many who are very hard and even impossible to teach according to the Buddha and therefore it cannot be expected that the Holy Spirit can instantly teach you what you ought to say because there is personal forceful resistant to say what you want to say and not what the Holy Spirit wants you to say and it suggests again that the Holy Spirit will come and he will teach over an extended course.

TEACHING IS USUALLY IF NOT ALWAYS A LABORIOUS PROCESS NEEDING REPETITION IN THOSE FINDING IT HARD TO GRASP, SELDOM INSTANTANEOUS AND NOTWITHSTANDING IT IS UNLIKELY IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE THAT A SPIRIT IN THE MIND CAN DISCRETELY OR IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS TEACH A PERSON WHAT TO SAY THAT IS SPECIFIC TO THE OCCASION, IT SUGGESTS THAT THE TEACHING BY THE HOLY SPIRIT WILL BE A PHYSICAL ONE EXTENDING OVER A TANGIBLE PERIOD OF TIME.

Jesus: "If a man loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him.

Note that Jesus said he and his Father will come to him, not speak to him. If you are an evil doer, Jesus and his Father will not even come to you let alone speak to you. God has not spoken to men and so men do not know his Father as Jesus said.

Craig (disgraced senator): I will resign & fight like hell.
Presumably he means he will fight vigorously when he said he will fight like hell but you have false perception that will end in mad perception if you think that fighting like hell means fighting vigorously.
You never fight vigorously with reason but you fight with force and here too it is an inappropriate response that will end in insanity because what is needed is not fighting like hell but to present calmly and clearly with reasons the facts or evidences of the case that exonerates him of misconduct.
Can a person’s silence make you suffer?
Can God’s silence make you suffer?
It is recorded that many times when he was asked questions, the Buddha remained silent and if he agreed to an invitation for a meal he remained silent.
It is the right of anyone to remain silent and his silence can only hurt you if you are emotional with expectations or demands to be answered.
The reason why a person suffers is never due to the silence of another but it is his own conduct in the name of putting on a show to please, impress, intimidate or dominate others that creates stress, restlessness and distraction for him. It is the right of another person to either point or not point out your errant ways and now that I have pointed it out to you that it is your constant forceful stretching of syllables, changing of speed and loudness that is the cause of your suffering, do you take action to pay attention and make effort to eradicate them or do you mindlessly continue and even tick me off?
Only speech can hurt:
Only the harsh way a person speaks, what he speaks that is false and hurtful can cause another to suffer.
The only way a person’s speech can be harsh is if there is constant forceful prolonging, even accelerating acceleration of speed and loudness in his speech.
What someone says can only hurt if they are false, sarcastic (opposite of what he said) or nonsensical (does not make sense).
A person’s silence can only hurt if it is not true silence but silence accompanied by surliness or deceit.
Sin not silence causes suffering:
It is impossible for a person to suffer if he truly did not sin but instead he would be endowed with calm clearly thinking assuredness in whatever circumstance he finds himself. It is impossible for a person who does not smile to please and impress others, who does not have any style in his postures, movements and speech, who lets his yes be yes only to suffer and if you keep on smiling, keep on having style and not let your yes be yes only, all the advice and comfort is to no avail and therefore it is impossible for the silence of God to cause you suffering but you should scrutinize yourself for blameworthy conduct.
Mother Theresa Is Very Emotional:
Like other beings trapped here, Mother Theresa is very emotional and the very emotionality which is a surrogate of mental force proves a barrier too big to surmount in order to access truth which is why she did not find it not because there is no truth.
Reason cannot stir up the mind but mental force, like and dislike and emotions can and must and a stirred mind cannot see or hear which is why she saw and heard nothing.
Mother Theresa: “For me, the silence and the emptiness is so great (silence and emptiness are just silence or no sound and no objects, there cannot be magnitude and ‘so great’ implies magnitude that is impossible to quantify. Because she perceives and believes in falsity she is unable to see truth), that I look and do not see, — Listen and do not hear — the tongue moves but does not speak. (if you look and listen with force, with forceful prolonging, changes in speed and strength of force you are barking up the wrong tree and will not find truth anywhere you look; only if you let your yes be yes only see and hear will you see and hear truth)” “Such deep longing for God (deep longing is about force not reason) — and … repulsed (you are not repulsed by reason but by force) — empty — no faith — no love — no zeal. — [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing.” “What do I labour for? If there be no God — there can be no soul — if there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true.” (She is essentially expressing disillusionment with her religion and questioning its veracity)
“So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them —because of the blasphemy — If there be God — please forgive me — When I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven—there is such convicting (those who can see do not need convincing or convicting) emptiness that those very thoughts return like sharp knives (again she is speaking about force, sharp knives. Force directly and indirectly through like and dislike and emotions rules her mind) and hurt my very soul. — I am told God loves me (by Jesus) — and yet the reality of darkness and coldness and emptiness is so great (again speaking of intensity) that nothing touches my soul. Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly to the Call of the Sacred Heart?”
It takes time to teach:
Teaching another is seldom an instantly successful venture but it is an enterprise that requires time, repetition and is not guaranteed to succeed.
For instance, just because I tell others (as there is) that there is constant stretching of syllables, changes in speed and loudness in the vocalizations of all beings here that is the only unnecessary source of the insoluble stress, restlessness and distraction that beset them does not mean they will understand what I mean let alone they will consummate the teaching by embracing non stretching of syllables, not changing speed and loudness.
After demonstrating many times in many different circumstances how different speech with and without speed changes sound like, even those who call themselves good and smart continue to do so, proving that teaching others is a laborious and often thankless task for those who are supposed to be good even tick me off.
Therefore notwithstanding nobody has heard a male voice in their minds teaching them all things, taking from what is Jesus and making it known to them and convincing them of sin, righteousness and judgment, the counselor who is in the mind must be very persistent in repetitively visiting many different minds to teach them all things.
Diagnosing Mother Theresa:
Based on what she wrote below it is possible to know (not believe or accept as true) her nature.
Mother Theresa: “For me, the silence and the emptiness is so great, that I look and do not see, — Listen and do not hear — the tongue moves but does not speak.” “Such deep longing for God — and … repulsed — empty — no faith — no love — no zeal. — [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing.” “What do I labour for? If there be no God — there can be no soul — if there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true.”
“So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them —because of the blasphemy — If there be God — please forgive me — When I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven — there is such convicting emptiness that those very thoughts return like sharp knives and hurt my very soul. — I am told God loves me — and yet the reality of darkness and coldness and emptiness is so great that nothing touches my soul. Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly (she is admitting it is not based on reason but blindness or force or emotion) to the Call of the Sacred Heart?”
As the Buddha said, there are fruits of the holy life (in terms of peace and bliss) now, later and thereafter and a person who is suffering and complaining is not reaping the fruits of the holy life and therefore cannot be living the holy life except in the false perception of ordinary people.
By expressing private opinions that are opposite to her public stance, she is revealing herself to be a hypocrite. By saying [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing, she is again revealing her hypocrisy. If the saving of souls holds no attraction to her and she still does it, she is doing it reluctantly, not wholeheartedly. If the saving of souls holds no attraction she should stop doing it rather than hypocritically continue. By speaking of attraction she is again speaking about force that she has confused with reason because attraction is merely the stirring in speed and strength of her mental force of going against self in an attractive way as opposed to a repulsive way at the sight of an object. Even if the saving of souls is attractive to her, it will be stressful and restless apart from conditioning herself further and degrading her mind.
By saying “Such deep longing for God — and … repulsed — empty — no faith — no love — no zeal. — [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing” she implies that the repulsion of her deep longing (that can only be deep because it is based on emotion not reason) makes her saving of souls without attraction. In other words her saving of souls will only be attractive to her not by itself but only if her deep longing for God is reciprocated.
By saying “What do I labour for? If there be no God — there can be no soul — if there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true.” She is seeking assurance that is impossible that there will be a God and therefore there will be rewards for her endeavours (she is selfish). Does she mean that only if there is a God and there is a soul and therefore there are heavenly rewards in the thereafter, her labours are meaningless? The Buddha said that "'But if there is no world after death, no fruit of actions rightly & wrongly done then here in the present life (by behaving nobly that includes assisting & not harming others)I look after myself with ease -- free from hostility, ill will, trouble' Thus even if there is no God or soul, there are still worthy fruits of her labor enough to sustain her unless she does not consider these (the gratification of helping others) as fruits or she experiences no mental gratification in helping others.
I take care (provide food and shelter) for half a dozen stray cats and they enjoy my company and are delighted to see me not because I know there is a soul in them or there is heavenly reward but because I can see they are sentient beings whose company I enjoy even better than humans because they are not proud and do not argue with me like humans do.
If you enjoy helping others and seeing them happy (as is possible in some if not in you), what does it matter if there is or is not God?
IN OTHER WORDS BENEATH THE MASS (OR MESS) OF WORDS THAT MAY CONFUSE AND ARE NOT DIRECT TO THE POINT THAT SHE MAY DENY, SHE IS ASKING WHAT IS THERE IN HER SAVING OF SOULS FOR HER? SHE IS SELFISH OR SELF CENTERED. SELF IDENTITY VIEWS ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA IS ONE OF THREE LOWER FETTERS TO FUTURE STATES OF WOE.
She is expressing doubt about the existence of God and uncertainty about herself and what she is doing. This is the same doubt and uncertainty that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future states of woe.
The reason she cannot see God is because she has advanced false perception and logic as evidenced by her saying the silence and emptiness is so great. Silence is just no sound and emptiness is just space without objects and they have no magnitude or greatness that she is saying she can perceive.
It is false logic to reason that if there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true because even though you cannot bear it then, what Jesus said is a mixture of matters for faith (that there is heaven and hell, there is eternal life and punishment, there is a close of the Age, there is this Age and the next) and matters for discernment (woe to you who laughs for you shall weep, let your yes be yes only, do not kill or steal or tell lies or speak harshly that hurt yourself and others). Even if what Jesus said that are matters for faith are false, what he said that are matters for discernment still stand so how you say Jesus is not true? Even if I am not the counsellor it is still the truth that there are constant forceful prolonging of syllables, changes of speed and loudness in the vocalizations of all beings (not just humans) here and that is the only unnecessary source of the stress, restlessness and distraction that they must suffer from that is also conditioning them so that they are doomed to madness. Even if I am false, what I said above is still true as I have proven to myself that if I spoke with style like the rest, stress, restlessness and distraction start to assail me.
“Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly to the Call of the Sacred Heart?” indicates her actions are not guided by reason (you cannot surrender blindly to reason but you can only surrender blindly to force) but driven by blind emotion or urges. The man of reason assesses a situation calmly and clearly, examining all the factors that may be relevant and then make a decision as to what to do or say and there is no question of surrendering blindly.
By saying ‘So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them — because of the blasphemy’ she is acknowledging her pretence and cultivating forceful emotional conflict to be aware of so many unanswered questions and yet be afraid to uncover them, not because of reason but because of the fear of blaspheming. If you are such a contorted person is it any surprise you cannot see and know the truth?
The only way that ‘when I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven — there is such convicting emptiness (she is so convinced by their emptiness or her false perception is very strong) that those very thoughts return like sharp knives and hurt my very soul’ is that those thoughts are delivered with force to a virtual heaven in her mind so that when they return, those very or same thoughts as she herself admits, return like sharp knives to hurt her very soul. The force in the thoughts that return like sharp knives must be added by her unless you think God added the cutting force and returned it to her.
Reward seeking or calculating behaviour:
Although not everyone does so, it is hardly unusual for people, even females to be reward seeking and calculating for self gain in their behaviour and many will deny they do so and disguise such that they will not admit directly that if only God will reveal himself to me I will only be too willing to do charitable works but they turn around to accuse God of silence that makes them suffer and what meaning is there in saving souls when God does not exists?
“Such deep longing for God — and … repulsed — empty — no faith — no love — no zeal. — [The saving of] Souls holds no attraction — Heaven means nothing.” “What do I labour for? If there be no God — there can be no soul — if there is no Soul then Jesus — You also are not true” is a contorted roundabout way to say that disillusioned by not being able to feel the presence of God, her labours are futile and she holds no attraction for saving souls.
If you do something for the rewards it gives then you cannot truly mean it but you are after the rewards or what you do is hypocritical, merely a vehicle to attain the reward.
Then, Ven. Malunkyaputta went to the Blessed One.
"Lord, if the Blessed One knows that 'The cosmos is eternal,' then may he disclose to me.' If he knows that 'The cosmos is not eternal,' then may he disclose to me.' But if he doesn't know or see, the straightforward things is to admit, 'I don't know. I don't see.'
"Malunkyaputta, did I ever say, 'Come, Malunkyaputta, live the holy life under me, and I will disclose to you that 'The cosmos is eternal or not eternal,' or 'The cosmos is finite or infinite?" "No, lord."
"And did you ever say to me, 'Lord, I will live the holy life under the Blessed One and [in return] he will disclose to me that 'The cosmos is eternal,'
"No, lord."
"Then that being the case, foolish man, who are you to be claiming grievances/making demands of anyone?
"Malunkyaputta, if anyone were to say, 'I won't live the holy life under the Blessed One as long as he does not disclose to me that "The cosmos is eternal; the man would die and those things would still remain undisclosed by the Tathagata.
"It's just as if a man were wounded with an arrow thickly smeared with poison. His friends would provide him with a surgeon, and the man would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know whether the man who wounded me was a noble warrior, a priest, a merchant, or a worker.' He would say, 'I won't have this arrow removed until I know the given name & clan name of the man who wounded me...or until I know whether the bow with which I was wounded was a long bow or a crossbow...until I know whether the bowstring with which I was wounded was fiber, bamboo threads, sinew, hemp. The man would die and those things would still remain unknown to him.
"It's not the case that when 'The cosmos is eternal,' there is the living of the holy life. Whether, 'The cosmos is eternal,' or 'The cosmos is not eternal,' there is still the birth, aging, death, sorrow, pain, despair, & distress whose destruction I make known right here & now.
"So, Malunkyaputta, remember 'The cosmos is eternal,' is undisclosed by me. 'The cosmos is not eternal,' is undisclosed by me.
"And why are they undisclosed by me? Because they are not connected with the goal, do not lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding.
"And what is disclosed by me? 'This is stress,' 'This is the origination of stress,' 'This is the cessation of stress,' 'This is the path of practice leading to the cessation of stress,'. And why are they disclosed by me? Because they are connected with the goal. They lead to disenchantment, dispassion, cessation, calming, direct knowledge, self-awakening, Unbinding.
Triumph or travesty?
Quote headline: Triumph or travesty? Golden Ohuruogu is a true heroine of our time.
Comment: This headline is asking others a question that demands an answer that troubles others to think. It is unnecessary to pose questions to others but to get on with it and tell readers why she is or is not a heroine.
You think nothing with this but it is not letting your yes be yes only and trying to be sensationalist and therefore is serious karma for troubling others with unnecessary questions. Most people cannot be bothered about the question.
There will always be excuses never no excuses:
There are always excuses or false reasons for doing or saying something never no excuses for saying or doing something as is commonly said in falsity.
For instance there are many possible excuses not no excuse for asking ‘why are you so rude?’ but apart from saying it mischievously there is only one reason namely to tick off or tell the person he is nasty and therefore bad. Any other reasons proffered are excuses. For instance you could argue that she did not mean to be nasty, she was merely her viewpoint that is equally valid as others or what she meant to say was that she is puzzled by or could not understand why I was so rude.
If you argue that I misunderstood her, what she mean was that she is puzzled or cannot understand why I am so rude, then you have serious false logic if you believe (or accept as true) that she cannot understand why I am so rude is the same as why are you so rude. The former poses no questions but the latter is asking me to explain why I am so rude.
Even if you accept that what she meant was she could not understand why I am so rude, why would she, out of the blue without context to a formal patient doctor relationship, suddenly want to let me know I am so rude except it is driven by a motive to put me down, to tell me I am bad?
If her intention to letting me know I am rude is constructive, she should not ask me why I am so rude but she should specifically tell me in what ways I had been rude and how instead I should behave according to what she considers is polite. Because she never did that, she is kidding herself if she thinks she is confronting my rudeness in a constructive manner ‘to teach me a lesson’.
You could cite all sorts of excuses like she did not mean rude but why I am so cold but these are all excuses and she herself should know or God will know whether she had rudeness in mind because she wanted to slap me in the face.
THUS NO MATTER SINCERE OR SOFTLY SPOKEN IT MAY BE TOUTED TO BE, THE QUESTION ‘WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE’ CAN ONLY HAVE ONE TRUE CAUSE AND THAT IS IT IS DRIVEN OUT OF ILL WILL THAT MAY BE CAREFULLY CLOAKED BY CONTROLLED GENTLE MANNER TO CONFRONT OR ATTACK OR PUT DOWN, IMPLYING THE OTHER PERSON IS NASTY.
ASKING SOMEONE WHY HE IS SO RUDE IS NEVER DRIVEN BY GOODWILL BUT ALWAYS BY ILL WILL TO PUT OR DRESS HIM DOWN. IF YOU THINK THERE CAN POSSIBLY BE GOOD WILL, YOU THINK THE SOFT SPOKEN MANNER IT IS SAID MEANT GOODWILL YOU MAY BE RIGHT OR HAVE ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION. ANY STYLE EVEN IF IT IS SOFTLY SPOKEN RENDERS WHAT IS SAID INSINCERE BECAUSE YOU CANNOT MEAN THE STYLE WITH WHICH YOU ASKED THE QUESTION AS IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH MEANING BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE NAMELY THE USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT PERSECUTES THE PERSON YOU ARE ASKING.
The way a person speaks can only be rude or harsh if there is forceful stretching, changes in speed and loudness that stresses, make restless and distract the listener and because I do not stretch, change speed and loudness when I speak, I cannot be harsh or rude except in your false perception that because I do sound like I am attracted to you or want you to be impressed by me, I am rude. Just because a person does not speak in a way that makes you admire him or be impressed with him or he does speak in a way that makes you pleased with yourself does not mean he is rude or ignoring you or cold and it is your false perception or paranoia that makes it so.
Because I do not behave in a way that you would like me to behave, you automatically disliked it and thus disliking you un-righteously deprecate me by saying I am rude.
Hard if not impossible not to have style:
This is a world where every creature not just humans and big animals but even insects constantly bombard each other with audio visual stimuli that have constant unnecessary forceful prolonging, changes in speed, direction and strength of force that induces stress, restlessness and distraction that coerces a being to similarly adopt a style of his own by also forcefully prolonging, change speed, direction and loudness that because it is conditioning apart from degrading the mind, becomes addictive and hard to shed like alcoholism or smoking once a being has been inducted into style that he comes to accept as natural and coupled with his own foolishness or lack of discernment, indifference and nature driven by ill will, makes it very hard if not impossible for most beings mesmerized by this world to see the way out of this morass, to see and put to a stop all stretching, changing speed and loudness that is constantly present in their perceiving, thinking, speaking and motion.
And because style is all about the constant unnecessary use of force, it is never pleasure as it is made up to be but it is always tormenting even to maddening levels and leads to death and perdition and the person who will continue to dally in style when it is now possible to exit is a fool heading for even eternal regret.
Lewd monkeys lust after human females:
It is reported that in Kenya where human farming is encroaching on animal habitat that a troupe of monkeys are in conflict with human farmers. The monkeys are afraid of human males and so when the human females dressed as males, the monkeys pointed to their breasts to say they know they are not males and they even make lewd gestures shaking their breasts and pointing at their private parts as if to intimidate that they will sexually molest the human females.
Thus all the animals you see around may be, as the Buddha said, valid beings like you are animals as a result of punishment that may correspond to what Jesus said ‘eternal habitations’ and if you are not careful you will join them and the next opportunity to become humans again may be even another eternity that may last billions of years.
The Buddha said there is an infinitude of consciousness and there may be an infinite number of beings.
Quote: "But the monkeys can tell the difference and they don't run away from us and point at our breasts. They just ignore us and continue to steal the crops."
"The monkeys grab their breasts, and gesture at us while pointing at their private parts. We are afraid that they will sexually harass us," said Mrs Njeri.

Monkey misery for Kenyan women villagers
By Juliet Njeri BBC News, Nachu, central Kenya
Monkeys destroyed this scarecrow, according to villagers
A troop of monkeys is giving Kenyan villagers long days and sleepless nights, destroying crops and causing a food crisis.
Earlier this month, local MP Paul Muite urged the Kenya Wildlife Service to help contain their aggressive behaviour.
But Mr Muite caused laughter when he told parliament that the monkeys had taken to harassing and mocking women in a village.
But this is exactly what the women in the village of Nachu, just south-west of Kikuyu, are complaining about.
Sexual harassment
They estimate there are close to 300 monkeys invading the farms at dawn. They eat the village's maize, potatoes, beans and other crops.
And because women are primarily responsible for the farms, they have borne the brunt of the problem, as they try to guard their crops.
The monkeys grab their breasts, and gesture at us while pointing at their private parts
Villager Lucy Njeri
They say the monkeys are more afraid of young men than women and children, and the bolder ones throw stones and chase the women from their farms.
Nachu's women have tried wearing their husbands' clothes in an attempt to trick the monkeys into thinking they are men - but this has failed, they say.
"When we come to chase the monkeys away, we are dressed in trousers and hats, so that we look like men," resident Lucy Njeri told the BBC News website
"But the monkeys can tell the difference and they don't run away from us and point at our breasts. They just ignore us and continue to steal the crops."
In addition to stealing their crops, the monkeys also make sexually explicit gestures at the women, they claim.
"The monkeys grab their breasts, and gesture at us while pointing at their private parts. We are afraid that they will sexually harass us," said Mrs Njeri.
The Kenya Wildlife Service head of other species, Mr Charles Musyoki, told the BBC News website that the behaviour the villagers were complaining about has not been documented before, but they had launched investigations.
"I have not observed that, but we are actually sending a team there. We have constituted a team to go and verify the villagers claims. I hope when they come back and submit their report, we will be able to respond to this claims from an informed position," he said.
He also raised doubts as to whether the primates were vervet monkeys as originally identified.
"If they were chimpanzees I would probably say yes, they could be behaving in this way, but this kind of aggression has not been documented in monkeys."
But whatever the truth of the villagers claims, the predominantly farming community is now having to receive famine relief food.
The residents say the monkeys have killed livestock and guard dogs, which has also left the villagers living in fear, especially for the safety of their babies and children.
All the villagers' attempts to control the monkeys have failed - the monkeys evade traps, have lookouts to warn the others of impending attacks and snub poisoned food put out by the residents.
"The troop has scouts which keep a lookout from a vantage point, and when they see us coming, they give warning signals to the ones in the farms to get away," said another area resident, Jacinta Wandaga.
'Monkey squad'
The town has been warned by the Kenya Wildlife Service not to harm or kill any of the monkeys, as it is a criminal offence.
The monkey squad are not very good at scaring away the monkeys
Running out of options, residents are harvesting their crops early in an attempt to salvage what they can of this year's crop.
Unfortunately, this only invites the monkeys to break into their homes and steal the harvested crops out of their granaries.
Even the formation of a "monkey squad" to keep track of the monkeys' movements and keep them out has failed.
The area is simply too large for the few volunteers to cover, they say.
Some residents have lost hope and abandoned their homes and farms, but those who have stayed behind, like 80-year-old James Ndungu, are making a desperate plea for assistance.
"For God's sake, the government should take pity on us and move these monkeys away because we do not want to abandon our farms," he said.
"I beg you, please come and take these animals away from here so that we can farm in peace."
The KWS team say they will observe the monkeys for a week and investigate the villagers' claims.
"We will be able to tell whether indeed they are exhibiting the kind of behaviour that the farmers are saying. If we find the claims to be true, then we will need to take the research a notch higher to find out why those animals are behaving in such a strange way," Mr Musyoki said.