The Nature Of Sadness

What distinguishes sadness from other emotions is that whereas in all the other emotions his mental force is changing in speed and strength of force, in sadness his mental force of going against self is mainly or entirely prolonging or stretching at a sustained speed and strength of force out of control of his force self preservation to then decay in speed and strength of force. Sadness is a form of dislike directed at self or outwardly where his mental force of going against self is essentially maintained or prolonged at a sustained speed and strength of force to then decay as if dying whilst his mental force of self preservation does not rise or is listless.
Emotions are never continuous but come in waves:
At sustained intense levels emotions may appear to be continuous but that is an illusion because it is waves of rising and falling strength following close on the heels of each other to give an semblance of constancy.
People speak of waves of lust sweeping their bodies and minds and this is rapid rising and falling intense waves of liking of a sexual nature.
When people become very angry or hopping mad, their anger may seem continuous but it is actually coming in waves of intense levels up and down which is why it is called hopping which is a up and down skipping movement. The sustained intensely angry man is stirred, stirred, stirred not constantly angry so that if he is being restrained from attacking his adversary, he is restrained for the anger to rise again and he lunges again to be restrained to again rise in anger to lunge again.
Thus whereas in all other emotions that are derivatives of like and dislike, the person's mental force of going against self rises in speed and strength to a peak to then fall and rise again, in sadness, the peak in speed and strength is sustained to then decay gradually to again recur in waves. The key ingredient in emotions is constantly rising speed and strength whilst the key ingredient in sadness is prolonged maximal speed and strength.
Theoretically correct:
It is theoretically correct that sadness is the consciousness experience of the prolonging use of force.
All applications of force on the mind, especially unopposed by the force of self preservation is painful and so it is less painful in dislike because the exposure is intermittent coming in waves whereas the exposure to naked force is prolonged at maximal speed and strength in sadness it is the most disagreeable and thus ‘sad’.
A mood eg angry, sad or jovial mood is essentially a prolonged emotional state. The angry mood remains long after the insult has passed because emotion is all about force that conditions and with each cycle of anger you are training yourself like a monkey to get angry so that it becomes self sustaining without need for provocation after a while. What is based on reason needs reason to sustain and if the reason has passed it vanishes.
(YOU CANNOT USE EMOTION TO WORK OUT THE NATURE OF EMOTIONS OR ANYTHING ELSE BECAUSE EMOTIONS ARE ALL ABOUT FORCE AND BLIND BUT YOU CAN & MUST USE REASON TO WORK OUT COMPLETELY WHAT IS THE NATURE OF EMOTIONS AND EVERYTHING ELSE BECAUSE REASON SEES AND UNDERSTANDS AND THEREFORE TRUE REASONING NOT COPIED ROTE REASON IS HIGHER. EVEN TRUE REASON IS ULTIMATELY PLODDING AND TIRING AND THE WISE PERSON LEARNS TO STOP THINKING AND JUST SEES WHAT IS GOING ON AND SO THE PERSON WHO CAN CONSCIOUSLY NOT THINK BUT JUST SEE IS HIGHER THAN THE PERSON WHO CANNOT HELP THINKING. SEEING TOO IS NOT THE ULTIMATE ACCORDING TO THE BUDDHA BUT THERE IS A HIGHER STATE OF MIND WHERE ONE NEITHER PERCEIVES NOR NOT PERCEIVE.)
The relationship between style and emotion:
Apart from fear, all emotions are derivatives of like and dislike and are the different consciousness experiences generated by the different ways with which his force of going against self prolongs, changes speed and strength of force under or out of control of his force of self preservation.
The stirrings in prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that generate emotions are independent of the stirrings in prolonging, changing speed and strength of force that generate style although the emotion a person experiences will influence how he behaves (his style) and how he behaves (his style) will determine the emotion he experiences.
The stirrings of the mental force generating the emotions are independent of the stirrings that may be simultaneously generating style because without fabricating (speaking, thinking or moving) a person can experience strong attraction or liking for say a pretty girl. This strong liking on perception without thinking, speaking, doing things is essentially his mental force of going against self rapidly rising in speed and strength under the control of his force of self preservation to even intense levels of strength and speed and rapid cycles of repetitive rises.
Liking and the emotions derived from it like excitement, lust, greed, envy, is the consciousness experience of the rise in speed and strength of the person's force of going against self under the control of his force of self preservation that may recur in repetitive cycles.
Disliking and the emotions derived from it like boredom, hate, anger, is the consciousness experience of the rise in speed and strength of the person's force of going against self out of control of his force of self preservation that may recur in repetitive cycles.
There is no use of force to prolong in liking and disliking unlike sadness where the use of force to prolong is the salient feature.
Sadness is the emotion the consciousness experiences if the force of going against self is principally prolonging at aroused speed and strength out of control of the force of self preservation to then decay in speed and strength.
THUS THE STIRRINGS OF THE MENTAL FORCES THAT FABRICATE THE EMOTIONS ARE SEPARATE FROM THE STIRRINGS REQUIRED TO FABRICATE STYLE BUT THE RESIDENT EMOTION INFLUENCES THE STYLE BEING FABRICATED AND THE STYLE BEING FABRICATED CONVERSELY INFLUENCES THE EMOTION EXPERIENCED.
That a person can say the same words eg 'I love you' with different styles eg angrily, tenderly or mischievously indicates that style is flexible and depending on how one stretches syllables, change speed or loudness one fabricates an angry or tender or mischievous style that also causes his consciousness to experience the angry, tender or mischievous emotion.
The way you behave (namely style) determines what emotion you experience and conversely the emotion you experience determines the way you behave (style). Style and emotion are mutually reinforcing.
Your style or how you use force to prolong, change speed and loudness when you speak determines the emotion or like or dislike that you experience and the emotion you are experiencing determines the style or way you prolong, change speed and loudness when you speak.
For instance if one is sad, one tends to speak with more stretching and less speed and loudness changes in a decaying fashion associated with a listless force of self preservation. Conversely if one sang in a sad way, as when a opera singer who is not really sad sings with great sadness to impress his audience, he starts to experience sadness.
In the abnormal state of affairs, provided the emotion occupying the mind is not too intense, it is possible to express an emotion that is different or opposite to the one occupying one's mind by a style of speech or expression that conveys that faked emotion.
For instance a person who experiences no liking for a person can fake liking in his facial expressions and speech and in so doing he will experience some faked liking that may clash with his true dislike for the other person.
If the resident emotion is very strong, it will be hard for his faked style generating the faked emotion to impose that emotion on his resident emotion. For example if he is very angry or hateful or sad, it is unlikely that he can fake liking for the other person with his style of speech and expressions.
Simultaneous style & emotion:
Because there is style in everything the ordinary person perceives, thinks, speaks and does and it requires the constant use of force to prolong, change speed, direction and strength of force and he also constantly like or dislike or experiences emotions that at lower intensities may escape his awareness, his mental forces of going against self and self preservation must be constantly active fabricating style and emotion at the same time.
How is this possible?
Just as it is possible for a single musical recording or sound track to record complex musical information to give the illusion (not reality) of hearing many instruments playing and a vocalist singing, in the same way, a single complex undulation of the person's mental force may enable the person to at the same time fabricate his like or dislike whilst fabricating his style that is present in everything he perceives, thinks, says or does.
You may realize that the person's mental force is thus considerably overworked or harassed in having to fabricate his current emotion and style at the same time that sometimes are even conflicting in order to please others but provided the intensities of the emotion and style expressed are low he is able to cope quite well but as soon as situational demands for style are quite high and his aroused emotion is quite high, he is struggling to cope and fear loss of control leading to violence or inappropriate emotions or actions or deeds.
If you reflect on the past you may recollect occasions you dread in which you were caught in when you have become very emotional (your mental force have been strongly stirred) and there is intense pressures on you to perform or act (eg on stage) you become anxious with fear that you might make a fool of yourself by losing control or saying or doing something with style that also required using force that may be inappropriate.
THE REASON WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE MENTAL FORCE TO SIMULTANEOUSLY FABRICATE EMOTIONS AND STYLE IS BECAUSE EMOTIONS ARE USUALLY INTERMITTENT OR COME IN WAVES OF RISING SPEED AND STRENGTH WHILST STYLE IS THE CONTINUOUS USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE.
THUS AT LOWER LEVELS OF EMOTIONS AND EVEN LOWER LEVELS OF STYLISHNESS, THE MIND CAN COPE WITH THIS SIMULTANEOUS JUGGLING USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE EMOTION AND STYLE BECAUSE STYLE IS ROTE OR MINDLESSLY REHASHED WITHOUT NEED FOR ATTENTION WHILST THE EMOTION IS ONLY INTERMITTENTLY FABRICATED JUST AS A MAN CAN TAKE HIS HANDS OFF THE STEERING WHEEL TO ADJUST THE VOLUME OF HIS STEREO.
BUT AT INTENSE LEVELS OF EMOTIONS OR INTENSE LEVELS OF ACTING WITH INTENSE DEMANDS FOR STYLE THEN THE PERSON'S MENTAL FORCES ARE PUSHED TO THE LIMIT OF CAPABILITY TO JUGGLE BOTH AND THE STYLISH EMOTIONAL PERSON MUST DREAD BREAKDOWN AND MAKING A FOOL OF HIMSELF TO BECOME VIOLENT OR DOING OR SAYING SOMETHING INAPPROPRIATE SOMETHING THAT IS A DREAD IF NOT PHOBIA TO ALL WHO WILL NOT GIVE UP THEIR EMOTIONS OR STYLE; THEY MUST DREAD ONE DAY THEY WILL MAKE A FOOL OF THEMSELVES IN FRONT OF OTHERS LIKE DROPPING THEIR PANTS OR SAYING SOMETHING EMBARASSING.
The nature of the emotions:
Emotions apart from sadness and fear and perhaps shame, are basically like and dislike dressed up in fancy clothes for different occasions.
Depending on whether like or dislike is focused or unfocussed, their targets whether inward or outward you have the various emotions.
Emotions based on like are excitement (thrill, fascination, interest), lust, greed, hunger, thirst, pride, envy.
Emotions based on dislike are hate (focussed), anger (unfocussed), jealousy, shame, boredom or disinterest, disgust, derision.
Like is nothing more than the consciousness’ experience of the stirring in speed and strength of the person’s force of going against self under the control of his force of self preservation with little or absent use of force to prolong and dislike is nothing more than the consciousness’ experience of the stirring in speed and strength of the person’s force of going against self poorly under or out of control of his force of self preservation with little or absent use of force to prolong.
The intensity of like or dislike experienced depends on the rate of accelerations in speed and strength of force, the magnitude of speed and strength of force reached and the cycles of repeat of waves of liking and disliking.

Sadness is the disliking emotion that the consciousness experiences when his mental force of going against self is mainly or entirely prolonging out of control of the listless force of self preservation to then to gradually decay in speed and strength as if dying. Depression is merely intense sadness that may not respond to efforts to cheer him up or have no apparent causes.
Pride is the experience of liking directed inwardly at self that has tendency of blowing himself up like a balloon as a result of hearing praise or seeing objects that the person identifies with eg his children, wife or house. Pride is constant in the person but at lower intensities its presence may escape his distracted attention.
Thus in order to experience shame or dislike for self, the person’s pride must first be deflated in order for his dislike for self to arise and hence shame is the experience of dislike for self associated with the deflation of one’s pride.
Lust is nothing more than like for sexual objects or matters.
Greed is nothing more than like for material objects like money, assets.
Not everyone who is severely deprived of food and water will experience extreme hunger or thirst or extreme desire or like for food and water but hunger and thirst are conditioned emotions that depend on how strong a person’s mental force of going against self is and hunger and thirst varies in strength from person to person. They are two dimensional in me because my mental force of going against self is rudimentary whilst in emotional people hunger and thirst can become very intense that they lose control of themselves. Some people get hungry and thirsty very quickly whilst others do so very slowly.
Envy is liking a person as a result of liking desirable attributes associated with him like handsomeness, his possessions like girlfriend or car or wealth.
Jealousy is dislike for a person as a result of dislike for his possession of desirable attributes like handsomeness, pretty girlfriend or expensive car.
Hate can be directed at others or self and it is dislike that is focussed on a target.
Anger can be directed inwardly or outwardly and it is unfocussed dislike at some occurrence.
Fear is the only emotion that is driven by the force of self preservation. Because the force of going against self is the force that powers all that being’s activities and the force of self preservation always opposes to try to bring it to a halt because the activity harms self, in a situation of fear, the person’s force of self preservation rises rapidly in speed and strength that coupled with a rapid fall in speed and strength of the force of going against self, has the net effect of pulling the person away from the activity he was undertaking with his force of going against self.
For those familiar with golf, the left hand is the hand that provides the power of the stroke whilst the right hand on the grip is to provide the control of the shot, not power. When the power of the left hand that can be compared to the mental force of going against self is well controlled by the right hand that can be compared to the mental force of self preservation, the shot will be a good one and is experienced as like by the person’s consciousness. Should the right hand struggle to control the power of the left hand, it will be a bad shot and is experienced as dislike by the consciousness.
IT IS LIKE AND DISLIKE AND THEIR DERIVATIVES THE EMOTIONS THAT RUN ORDINARY PEOPLE’S LIVES WHILST WHAT THEY SAY OR DO IS REHASHED FROM THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES AND HOW THEY REASON OR THE GENERALIZATIONS WITH WHICH THEY TRY TO MAKE SENSE OF WHAT IS HAPPENING IS USUALLY COPIED ROBOTICALLY FROM OTHERS WITHOUT QUESTIONING AND WHAT AND HOW THEY SEE AND HEAR TOO IS PROGRAMMED NOT TRULY IMPARTIAL. WHEN SOMETHING HAPPENS, THEY TAKE SNAPSHOTS ACCORDING TO THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES INSTEAD OF EXAMINING IT UNEMOTIONALLY IN ITS ENTIRETY, CONSULT THEIR MENTAL JUKEBOXES OF POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS AND SATISFIED WITH THE EXPLANATION THEY FOUND, THEY JUST MOVE ON.
(I am not a top scientist or cleric or philosopher but how come no one else explained emotions, like and dislike as I have? If what I say is false and there is so much falsity in this world, how come there is no one who speaks falsely like me or is this the truth that the world cannot receive because it neither sees nor know it? What I say is not just theoretical conjecture because they have practical application because if you find sadness, anger and other emotions tormenting, there is a way out by paying attention to stop using force to stretch, change speed and loudness that would provide the emotions no sustenance so that they will permanently die out). Even if mankind’s top religious authorities want to speak like me they cannot because such thoughts never occur to them and there is strong emotional opposition or resistance to say what I say)
Stress: Stress too is an emotional state of the mind wherein the incessant bombardment of force from style and emotions create a painful spasmodic or seized pain state associated with tension in the bodily musculature that cannot be rapidly shaken off but takes time to wear off.
Restlessness is a forceful state of the mind with the mindless irrational urge to change, to move, do something, say something.
Distraction is a forceful state of the mind wherein one cannot assimilate data input, you read but it does not register, someone tells you something, you nod but it does not click. Your mind is blurred or divided between many subjects and cannot focus.
Sexual provocation:
People not only provoke others verbally or physically to a fight or quarrel but they also provoke others in many other ways like sexually.
Many men and women dress, pose, talk and walk in ways calculated to sexually provoke others to lust after them and by extension rape them.
Sexual provocation is actually no different from verbal or physical provocation because it seeks to arouse the other person's lust which is nothing more than stir the speed and strength of his mental force in an attractive way.
When you provoke someone sexually you are not attacking them but inviting others to attack you sexually by lusting after you and that is more sinful than sexually attacking another person. Provocation is inviting the other person to attack you verbally, physically or sexually.
Smiling is provoking others:
Ordinary people think they are not provocative, only others are but they are deluded.
An important reason people smile at someone is to express they like you and to provoke or invite you to use your mental force to drive your facial muscles to smile to return the smile or retaliate. When the person thus invited smiles, he has applied force with prolonging, changing speed and strength on his mind harming it and therefore by smiling you have provoked him to sin not meritorious.
Every time someone expresses style in what he says or does by using force to prolong, change speed, direction and strength of force he is provoking his audience to similarly use force to change and prolong. Thus provoking others to a quarrel by asking not saying something incendiary like “why are you so rude” is just a natural specific extension of the personal culture of provoking others to use force. So the person who argues, why should she want to incite you to quarrel with her is foolish or emotionally antagonistic without reasoning out what he puts forward. She has many reason to get me into a argument, from a specific extension of her culture of provocation, to detain me because she perceived I wanted to terminate the contact, she wants to inflict prolonged suffering on me that is only possible in an argument, she wants to gently provoke me into a heated argument in which I would be seen as the one who was rude in scolding her and she is an addict to verbal fights as a result many past practices.
Because I do not smile to others, do not use force to fabricate style I am truly an un-provocative person and I cannot be accused of provoking her to provoke me.
You are foolish or antagonistic to say people have no reasons to provoke others without cause because their ever present style which is little more than their use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force provokes others to similarly use force to prolong, change speed and strength of force even if they do not know that, their smiles and expressed liking and disliking are constantly provoking others to similarly use force to smile, like and dislike and hence to specifically provoke others like asking loaded question is just an instance in a constant attitude of provocation of others.
ALL ORDINARY PEOPLE WITH STYLE ARE CONSTANTLY PROVOKING OTHERS, THEIR STYLE OR THEIR CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT IS DISCERNIBLE IN THEIR APPEARANCES, POSES, SPEECH AND MOTION PROVOKES OTHERS TO SIMILARLY USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND THEREFORE IT IS NOT A SURPRISE THAT IN THIS CULTURE OF CONSTANT PROVOCATION OF OTHERS THIS WOMAN WILL WANT TO PROVOKE ME BY ASKING, ‘WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE’ MAY BE BECAUSE SHE THINKS I AM AN EASY PREY.
I CANNOT BE PROVOCATIVE OR RUDE BECAUSE I DO NOT USE FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS AND THEREFORE DO NOT PROVOKE.
Gentleness due to style is false and evil:
Style is all about the way you say something that though it has similarities with others, differs from others and is totally unnecessary except for show to impress, please, intimidate and dominate that creates stress, restlessness and distraction in yourself and others.
Thus if your gentleness is about the way you speak or do by mobilizing your force of self preservation to momentarily attenuate the volume of the force going against self just as you turn down the volume of the radio but the same old tunes are playing but only at a lower volume, then it is deceptive and evil, it is the more that comes evil not good as you falsely perceive.
If you let your yes be yes you say what you want to say, if you don't let your yes be yes only, you say it with gentleness that is the more that comes from evil.
Thus the person who provokes someone gently is more evil than someone who makes no pretence to disguise his provocation.
If you think you are friendly if you say gently, “I disagree with you, I smile because I like someone” you are deluded because your gentle way belies the confrontational message you convey.
It is not difficult to see that smiling and liking are what people in this world worship as happiness and so by saying you smile because you like someone you are confirming yourself to be an ordinary person in the eyes of the Buddha because he said what others call happiness, that the noble ones have found is suffering and what others call suffering that the noble ones have found is happiness. Thus as a person who flows with stream by liking and smiling you will be detained here, not go to heaven.
Jumping up and down with excitement:
People speak of jumping up and down with excitement as fans do when their team score a goal and what their bodies are doing is tracking the waves of rise and fall in speed and strength of force of their forces of going against self under the control of their forces of self preservation as they perceive their team scoring a goal.
Thus emotions are waves of rising speed and strength of force of their mental forces followed by a fall in speed and strength of force to be renewed in cycles until exhausted.
In contrast sadness is the sustained application of the raised speed and strength of force of their forces of going against self with a listless indifferent force of self preservation to then decay in speed and strength to be renewed in cycles until exhausted.
Sustained application of uncontrolled force on the consciousness is more painful than regular peaked exposures to force as in hate or anger and therefore sadness is more painful than dislike.
(I may be an ordinary person or a liar but how come no others, no psychiatrists speak or lie like me?)
Emotion as intended and a side effect:
When emotion is generated by the way you use force to stretch, change speed and strength of force as you fashion the style of what you say or do, emotion as a consciousness experience is merely a side effect of the labours of your mental force.
Sometimes in the name of pleasing, impressing, intimidating or dominating others you fashion styles that give the impression of false emotions in your mind like you talk fiercely to dominate another, you smile and talk gently as if you like the other person.
Then there is mental force deliberately or exclusively changing speed, strength and prolonging just to generate emotions for the consciousness to experience, it is not doing any useful work except generate emotions. Because this is conditioning, very soon in the emotional person’s career, the generation of emotions become involuntary, the occurrence of certain events that may be minor, eg hearing a certain word can cause offence or anger. Thus a kid that used to tolerate being scolded will brook no criticism however mild, as soon as he senses criticism right or wrong, he explodes like a volcano.
When a lustful boy sees a girl he likes, his mental force of going against self rises rapidly in speed and strength to then fade away. If he really likes her very much he experiences many cycles of such rises in speed and strength that can reaches intense levels in rapid succession. Thus there is no prolonging in attraction or lust merely rise in speed and strength to then fall and then rise again.
Pay attention next time you are sad and you may realize that sadness is just the application of force on your mind that has risen to a peak in strength and speed and then maintained unchanged to then fade away to recur until exhausted whilst the mental force of self preservation has sort of given up or not bothered to rise to oppose.
Emotion as the product and by product:
Emotion can be the product of the work of the mental forces as when a lustful man experiences repeated intense cycles of lust on seeing a pretty girl that has nothing to do with his fabricating any style or emotion can be a by product generated as a result of the way his mental forces stretch, change speed and strength when talking or doing something.
Sometimes the fool may deliberate stoke his emotions by repeatedly eyeing the girl so that his lust will flare up a new as some love struck (eg lust struck) keeps drooling over a photo of an actress.
And just as you can stir your mental force to create a genuine emotion, you can also stir your mental force in a certain way to fake an emotion like you like someone when you don’t.
Because emotions are crucial to the sufferings of beings here and the stopping of the use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness is fundamental in the permanent cessation of all emotions to head to heaven, whoever is the counselor must also say what I say. If I said so where no one in the past or today will, I will have superseded the counselor which is not possible because it will render what Jesus said as false.
Acting on consciousness and fabrications:
The mental forces are acting directly on the person’s consciousness when they are fabricating emotions but they are acting on the person’s fabrications (perception, thinking, speaking and motion), specifically the mental or physical syllables and units of motion to produce style with emotion as a side product.
It is the tendency of the mental forces thus aroused in emotion to latch on to fabrications and so an emotionally aroused person has a tendency to do or say something, anything to dissipate the aroused emotion or mental force. Thus the emotional man whose lust is aroused will say something to seduce the girl or he might be driven to physically molest the girl. In the same way a person whose anger is aroused will be seized to say or do something that come to mind to retaliate.
THUS EMOTIONS ARE DANGEROUS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, IF YOU LIKE EMOTIONS AND WILL NOT GIVE UP EMOTIONS YOU ARE CONSORTING WITH THE DEVIL. AT LESSER LEVELS EMOTIONS ARE TOLERABLE BUT ALWAYS MIND BENDING BUT AT HIGHER LEVELS EMOTIONS CAN DRIVE YOU TO SAY OR DO FOOLISH THINGS THAT YOU MAY NOT JUST REGRET BUT PAY DEARLY IN KARMA EG WHEN YOU KILL OR RAPE SOMEONE. THE WISE PERSON WILL IDENTIFY EMOTIONS AND WASH HIS HANDS OFF EMOTIONS TO RESIDE ONLY IN CALM CLEAR REASON.
Why shame is so potent:
All people with style must possess shame for themselves that they usually deny or suppress to project an overinflated or unrealistic constant pride that must be constantly maintained with some anxiety and energy consumption and stress eg by acting as if they are confident, happy, successful, desirable and respectable when no matter how they may deny they feel ashamed of themselves because their constant styles and what they say or do is to please and impress others or they are prostituting themselves.
Because there is a lot of anxiety and energy invested to hide their shame for themselves and project their inflated pride, when something happens that exposes their undesirability, they experience quite a catastrophic shame which is a sudden collapse of their constantly projected pride and the sudden now no longer repressible or deniable shame.
Feeling Hurt:
Feeling hurt is a virtual mental pain (because there is no deliverance of physical force by what someone else said or did) that is related to but is not sadness.
Both are caused by a sick or subdued force of self preservation that has left the consciousness largely if not totally exposed to the full brunt of the force of going against self but sadness is dull lingering pain in slow waves and the feeling hurt is immediate, sharp and come in rapid even searing waves.
Whereas sadness is dull and lingering self inflicted (hara-kiri) pain on one's consciousness by one's force of going against self abandoned by one's force of self preservation, feeling hurt is the sharp immediate but lingering pain inflicted by the perception of what others said or did mediated by one's force of going against self abandoned by one's force of self preservation.
People say, “I feel hurt by what you said (eg joking to others about my clumsiness or fattiness) or did (eg cancelling my membership)” by which they mean they experience sharp mental or virtual not physical pain that usually recurs in waves and lingers upon perception of what someone else said or did. The psychological or virtual pain of humiliation of a proud person from being publically slapped is usually many times greater than the actual physical pain of the slap.
There is no physical transmission of force as in a slap when people are hurt by what is said and done and so the hurt must have been perpetrated by that person’s own mental force of going against self on his own consciousness un-chaperoned by his force of self preservation that gets increasingly searing with conditioning.
Thus ‘feeling hurt’ too is a form of emotion, a form of prolonged administration of force usually of a sharp or stabbing nature by one's force of going against self un-chaperoned by the force of self preservation as a result of the perception of what someone else said or did.
LIKE AND DISLIKE (AND ALL THE EMOTIONS DERIVED FROM THEM) IS THE APPLICATION OF FORCE RISING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS CHAPERONED BY THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO CAUSE ATTRACTION OR LIKE OR POORLY CHAPERONED BY THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO CAUSE REPULSION OR DISLIKE FOR WHAT IS PERCEIVED WHILST SADNESS AND FEELING HURT CAUSED BY THE APPLICATION OF FORCE ON THE CONSCIOUSNESS UNCHAPERONED BY THE FORCE OR SELF PRESERVATION SO THAT THERE IS NO RESTRICTION TO ITS INTENSITY AND DURATION TO CAUSE PAIN OF A DULL LINGERING NATURE (SADNESS) OR SHARP PROLONGED NATURE (BEING HURT) OF WHAT IS PERCEIVED.
MENTAL FORCE DIRECTED AT FABRICATIONS & CONSCIOUSNESS:
A PERSON’S MENTAL FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF CAN BE DIRECTED TO DO WORK BY ACTING ON THE PERSON’S FABRICATIONS EG HIS SYLLABLES OR UNITS OF MOTION TO CAUSE PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED OR STRENGTH OF FORCE TO MANIFEST HIS STYLE THAT HE SO DESIRES OR IT CAN BE TURNED TO ACT AGAINST HIS CONSCIOUSNESS WITH OR WITHOUT THE CHAPERONE OF HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO EITHER CAUSE LIKE OR DISLIKE OR THEIR EMOTIONAL DERIVATIVES (STRUGGLING CHAPERONE IN DISLIKE) OR TO CAUSE SADNESS AND FEELING HURT (WITHOUT CHAPERONE).
The sick & struggling mental force of self preservation:
When a person is gripped by sadness or feeling deeply hurt, he tends to lose his usual interests (likes), fears or concerns or become apathetic or indifferent to danger and this is an indication that in sadness and feeling hurt the person's force of self preservation has abandoned him or given up because fear or concern for danger is characterized by an ascendant force of self preservation. If the force of self preservation is sick or cowered, as occurs in sadness and feeling hurt, how can one be fearful?
When you lose interest in things, you lose attraction or liking for things and because liking requires active or lively control of the force of going against self by the force of self preservation as the former stirs in reaction to events occurring, the loss of interest or liking in sadness and feeling hurt is a reflection that these emotions are associated with a sick or listless force of self preservation.
THUS THE FACT THAT THE SAD OR HURT PERSON LOSES INTEREST OR ATTRACTION FOR THINGS AND LOSES HIS FEAR FOR DANGER IS AN INDICATION THAT THE MENTAL FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IS TROUBLED OR SICK IN SADNESS AND FEELING HURT.
The person who is angry, a form of dislike may throw all caution or fear to the wind to ignore fear of injury and death to pursue his adversary and here again it is an indication that the force of self preservation is mobilized but struggling to modulate the rampant force of going against self and sometimes it may lose total control so that the person throws all caution or fear (orchestrated by the force of self preservation) to the wind.
THE FACT THAT THE ANGRY PERSON MAY BUT DOES NOT ALWAYS LOSE CONTROL TO THROW ALL CAUTION OR FEAR TO THE WIND IS AN INDICATION THAT IN ANGER WHICH IS A FORM OF DISLIKE, THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IS ACTIVE BUT STRUGGLING TO CONTROL THE RAMPANT FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF BUT ON OCCASIONS IT CAN BE OVERWHELMED SO THAT THE ANGRY OR DISLIKING PERSON LOSES ALL FEAR, LOSES ALL RESTRAINT BY HIS FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION TO FIGHT TO THE DEATH.
IT IS A REFLEX THAT THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION WILL ALWAYS RISE TO MATCH THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO SHIELD THE CONSCIOUSNESS FROM THE FULL BRUNT OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF AND WHEN IT SUCCESSFULLY DOES THAT IT IS EXPERIENCED AS LIKE BUT IF YOU ARE ALWAYS GOING AGAINST YOURSELF, ALWAYS HEEDLESSLY APPLYING FORCE THAT GOES AGAINST SELF ON YOUR MIND EVEN TO VIOLENT LEVELS, A TIME WILL COME WHEN THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION BECOMES OVERWORKED AND TIRING, STRUGGLING TO KEEP PACE WITH THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IT CAUSES THE CONSCIOUSNESS TO EXPERIENCE DISLIKE AND WHEN THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION BECOMES INDIFFERENT, REFUSES TO RISE IN TANDEM WITH THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IT CAUSES THE CONSCIOUSNESS TO EXPERIENCE SADNESS OR FEELING HURT.
Five kinds of consciousness pain:
The end result of whatever application of force on the consciousness is pain.
What are types or sources of pain that afflict the consciousness exposed to force?
There is first the various kinds of physical pains mediated through somatic or bodily sense receptors as the burning pain caused by heat, sharp pain caused by sharp objects. The impact of force delivered to body parts is to create pain that is sustained for a period. This is physical or bodily pains that can be experienced by consciousness.
There is the pain of dislike and emotions derived from dislike (anger, hatred, jealousy) that is the pain of the exposure of the consciousness to a sharp peaking rise in speed and strength of the force of going against self uncontrolled by the force of self preservation.
Whilst the application of force that is accelerating in speed and strength under the control of the force of self preservation is considered pleasurable, that is actually a perversion of perception and it too is a form of pain compared to an absence of application of force that liking people have never experienced.
There is the pain of sadness that is the application of prolonging force out of control of the force of self preservation.
There is the pain of feeling hurt as a result of which shame is one form of wherein prolonging force of a sharp nature is applied unopposed by one's force of self preservation as a result of perceiving what is said or done by another.
There is the pain of stress which is a jammed or clenched pain gripping one's consciousness together with bodily muscle tension that cannot be relieved that is the result of prolonged exposure of the consciousness to all forms of force ranging from the use of force to prolong, change speed and strength of force to fabricate style, the exposure of the consciousness to force in experiencing liking and disliking & the exposure of the consciousness in experiencing sadness and hurt. The pain of stress seizes the consciousness and cannot be shaken off but like a tide that has risen it must be allowed to subside by reducing the application of force eg by seclusion or sleep.
THUS CONSCIOUSNESS EXPERIENCES PAIN FROM PHYSICAL SOURCES, FROM THE USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE STYLE, FROM THE USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE LIKING AND DISLIKING, FROM THE USE OF PROLONGING FORCE IN SADNESS AND FEELING HURT AND STRESS, THE SEIZURE OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS BY FORCE AS A RESULT OF RELENTLESS OR CONSTANT EXPOSURE TO FORCE WHATEVER THE SOURCE.
Working out the nature of shame:
All people who have style that is intended to impress others must have strong liking or attraction for themselves because when you want to impress others you want others to like you and if you want others to like you, you must also want to like yourself but the other side of wanting others to like you is that you are beholden to the opinions of others about you and you also want to say or do things to others that pleases them so that they like you and so no matter how stupid or how they deny they are trying to impress or please others, they must feel ashamed or dislike themselves that they also try to deny to themselves and hide from others by projecting an exaggerated even unrealistic pride that is in fact constant, only the intensity of expression varies.
In this attitude of projected pride that brooks no insults or attacks on the integrity of that pride and fervent denial of shame or dislike for oneself for striving to impress and please others that he must be vaguely aware no matter how he refuses or cannot see himself doing so, the unexpected occurrence of any event that shatters that pride to permit shame or dislike for self to well up is accompanied by a deep sharp sense of 'feeling hurt', his force of self preservation is defeated and abandons him allowing his force of going against self sustained unopposed action on his consciousness to cause sharp deep mental pain.
Pity is sadness for others or self:
Self pity is sadness for self and pity for others is sadness for others that is harmful for the person and others but because the foolish person has a perversion of what is bad is good, he believes he is doing good to himself and others by experiencing and expressing pity.
Not one bit of good is to be obtained by pitying others or self, according to the Buddha.
Being sorry if it is not a platitude is also being sad for what has happened.
Sadness not a frontline emotion:
Sadness is not a frontline voluntary emotion unlike the emotions that are derived from like or dislike (eg greed, lust, anger, hate, envy, jealousy) but sadness is a second line or late onset turning on oneself as a result of cumulative abuses or triggered by setbacks involuntary emotion.
Whenever the person’s mental force of going against self acts on the person’s consciousness the net result is the consciousness experience of emotion or like or dislike, because the mental force has nothing concrete to act on, it usually rises rapidly in speed and strength to then retreat like an incoming wave immediately retreats after reaching its peak rather than linger for some time.
In contrast, when the person’s mental force of going against self acts on the mind’s fabrications it has something concrete to latch on eg a syllable or unit of motion and therefore it can prolong, change speed and strength in this case.
In the normal course of event people don’t experience sadness, they are engrossed in experiencing like and dislike or emotions derived from them, it is only when their suffering from their constant exposure of their minds to force is sustained, they suffer specific setbacks that cannot be resolved that they become sad or their mental force acting on the consciousness now rises to peak strength and does not retreat but linger for sometime before retreating usually to flare up again and again until the sadness is exhausted or displaced by some distraction that has cropped up.
Subdued or deactivated force of self preservation:
In fear the force of self preservation is dominant over the force of going against self and in liking the force of self preservation is actively supervising or tracking the force of going against self hence it is an indication that the force of self preservation is subdued or inactive in sadness or feeling hurt that people who are sad or hurt invariably lose interest or liking and fear. It is a matter of course that a sad or hurt person should lose interest or fear because the force of self preservation crucial to their expressions is deactivated.
Why people become speechless:
The only reason why people become speechless when confronted by questions is because they are pretentious people whose replies are selective or vested, aimed at presenting a desirable image of themselves that they want to project and they are robots totally dependent on pre recorded or pre orchestrated answers who become speechless because they cannot find the right or suitable answer pre-recorded in their mental jukebox and thus fearful of making a fool of themselves or unable to perform live to fashion a specific reply to the novel situation at hand, they are stunned and speechless.
A Buddha is always present and he fully understands what you are trying to say (sometimes better than you understand what you are saying) and he always has an answer to what you ask. He may choose to remain silent which is different from stunned speechlessness because he chooses to remain silent. Even if a person who is not a robot does not know the answer to your question he says he does not know the answer rather than become speechless. Only a pretentious person who is trying to project an image who issues replies pre-recorded in her mental jukebox that are intended to upkeep that image can be speechless.
Quote: Letterman eventually apologised (if you want to apologize then do not mock her in the first place, if you have mocked her then you are a hypocrite to apologize), but had to fight hard not to mock her further when she began to talk about her up-and-coming new film, Repro! The Genetic Opera, a musical horror movie in which Paris sings. (that he had to fight hard not to mock again shows his apology is insincere and for show, he himself is headed for the cliff like Paris)

Paris loses her cool after being mocked by chat show king Letterman
Last updated at 10:33am on 1st October 2007
Unlike her post-jail interview with Larry King, the king of US chat show David Letterman did not bring out the kid gloves for his interview with heiress Paris Hilton.
Witty Letterman grilled Paris with questions about her stint in jail, and she was soon left uncharacteristically speechless during her guest appearance on the Late Show with David Letterman.
Jokes on you: Paris was the butt of chat show king David Letterman's jokes as he grilled her about her 'traumatic' stay in prison when she appeared on his show last Friday
Hilton, who served 23 days in prison for driving on a suspended license, was definitely not amused when she found herself the butt of Letterman's jokes when she appeared on his show.
Letterman, bombarded her with questions about her time in jail instead of asking her about her new fragrance.
He began by welcoming Paris and asking her, "How did you find your time in jail?".
He then went on to quiz the Simple Life star on prison food and whether she lost any weight behind bars.
Pout: After trying to laugh off the barrage of jokes she stuck out her bottom lip telling Letterman 'Now you're making me sad that I came because you're hurting my feelings'
"I'm not answering any more questions about it," she snapped. "I'm here for my clothing line, my movie and my perfume. I'm not here to talk about that."
After asking her whether she preferred Los Angeles or New York, the talk show host said: "How did you like jail?" "Not so much," was the frosty response from the hotel heiress.
Watch the interview here
The chat show audience were in stitches as Letterman proceeded to ask Hilton question after question about what it was like being locked up.
Paris claimed she only ate one hard-boiled egg and an orange for breakfast, would skip the baloney sandwich lunch and then eat her dinner alone in her cell. "Dinner was jail-mystery meat. I have no idea what it was but it was pretty bad."
"It was pretty bad," she said. "It's not supposed to be good - it's jail."
Letterman continued to mock Paris further by asking how she came to be in prison. He joked, "What is it you did? Do you know what you did?"
He also asked her why pal Nicole Richie had only spent 45 minutes in prison, after driving the wrong way on the freeway high on drugs.
When Paris didn't reply, he laughed hysterically and shook his head.
We are not amused: Paris fails to see the funny side of Letterman's stream of jokes about her stay in prison
The Simple Life star seemed to turn scarlet before exclaiming,
"I've moved on with my life so I don't really want to talk about it anymore."
Unfortunately for Paris, the quick-witted host had no intention of not talking about it and when a supportive member of the audience shouted 'I love you, Paris!', Letterman quipped: "Is that somebody you met in jail?"
Clearly mortified, Paris tried to make him stop by making puppy dog eyes and cried: "Now you're making me sad I came because you're hurting my feelings."
"I've moved on with my life," she said with a forced smile.
"So I don't really want to talk about it any more."
But Letterman was insistent, asking her whether she made friends in the clink, and asking if she had received letters about it since.
"I'm going on to the next question," Hilton snapped back, holding her hand in the air. "I'm over it.
Letterman eventually apologised (if you want to apologize then do not mock her in the first place, if you have mocked her then you are a hypocrite to apologize), but had to fight hard not to mock her further when she began to talk about her up-and-coming new film, Repro! The Genetic Opera, a musical horror movie in which Paris sings.
Only emotion not reason can stop speech:
Only force and the derivative of force, emotion can stop speech, stop someone from saying something, reason has no force to stop.
Thus in a situation when someone is speechless, either there is a suitable rote recording in his jukebox but his emotions are too strong to stop him from saying it or there are no suitable recording in his jukebox (the situation is unfamiliar to him) and just like company directors who are good at ordering others around and never done anything by themselves, they find themselves powerless to fashion something appropriate to say.
THUS IF YOU CAN BE SPEECHLESS YOU ARE A MAN OF FORCE OR EMOTION NOT A MAN OF REASON WHO CANNOT BE RENDERED SPEECHLESS BECAUSE THERE IS NO FORCE IN HIM TO STOP HIM SPEAKING.
Don’t apologize if you want to say it:
If you apologize it implies you (now) know what you previously said is hurtful, it is seldom that people did not realize beforehand what they will say is hurtful, thus if you knew what you said is hurtful and you still want to say it then don’t apologize because it is hypocritical and you will be punished for your hypocrisy on top of your hurtfulness.
UNLESS YOU TRULY DID NOT KNOW WHAT YOU SAID IS HURTFUL AND YOU HAVE RESOLVED NEVER TO SAY IT AGAIN THEN DO NOT APOLOGIZE, IF YOU KNEW WHAT YOU SAID IS HURTFUL AND YOU THEN APOLOGIZE THEN YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE WHO WILL BE PUNISHED FOR HURTFUL WORDS AND PUNISHED AGAIN FOR HYPOCRISY. WHAT IS THE USE OF APOLOGIZING WHEN YOU ARE GOING TO CONTINUE OFFENDING?
Why sadness is dull and hurt is sharp:
Sadness is self inflicted and no matter how severe, no one wants to sharply or decisively hurt himself and so the self inflicting of force is grudging or muffled but the hurt that is delivered by what others say or do stabs one like a knife because it is delivered virtually by others, others have no mercy for you whilst you still have some mercy for yourself and it is partly conditioning, you have been sharply stabbed before by the words and deeds of others that the hurt emanating from others is now sharp or searing.
Until one becomes mad, no one will voluntarily and enthusiastically kill himself and because people are not mad yet, they will only kill themselves grudgingly as blunt sadness not sharp self hurt, they trust the parrot in them or their mental jukebox to say and do everything for them not realizing the parrot or jukebox will kill them.
A commanding, struggling, listless and absent chaperone:
When a person’s force of self preservation is active and commanding over the force of going against self it is experienced as liking, if it is active but struggling it is experienced as dislike, when it is inactive and listless it is experienced as sadness and when it is absent, it is experienced as feeling hurt.
What and how a person perceives (sees, hears, smells, tastes, touch), thinks, speaks and does is powered by his force of going against self just as a car is powered by its engine and just as a car need brakes if it is to survive, the mind needs a force of self preservation acting like a chaperone to oppose its force of going against self.
You cannot tell a car to stop but you must use another opposite force to counter and bring to a halt the other force. Force will not listen to reason and therefore reason must direct another opposite force to stop that force.
When the force of self preservation or chaperone in whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does is commanding over the force of going against self or the top dog, it is experienced by the consciousness as liking.
When the force of self preservation or chaperone in whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does is active but struggling or the force of going against self is top dog, it is experienced by the consciousness as disliking.
When the force of self preservation or chaperone in whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does is listless or un-reactive, it is experienced by the consciousness as sadness.
When the force of self preservation or chaperone in whatever the person perceives, thinks, says or does is momentarily absent or paralyzed, it is experienced by the consciousness as feeling hurt.
Apart from fear and sadness, all the emotions are derivatives of like or dislike and hence all the emotions (liking and disliking) is dependent on whether the force of self preservation is commanding or struggling.
When someone who is experiencing sadness say “I don’t care anymore’ he is speaking of a mixture of not interested in things and also not fearing anymore.
Because in sadness his force of self preservation that is crucial in experiencing like or interest and fear is listless he cannot experience care (interest or fear) anymore than the man with tied hands can use his hands. Therefore what he said is false and he should say, “I cannot or am unable or powerless to care anymore”. Even the ‘anymore’ is false because as soon as his sadness fades, he starts caring again and therefore it is false to say ‘anymore’ instead of ‘at the moment’. Here as in many places people think they mean what they say but because they are ignorant what they say is false, they did not mean what they said.
The reason why feeling hurt is so sharp is because ordinary people have the attitude of denial of what is hurtful is not only not hurtful but pleasurable. When people say something nasty or sarcastic to them they smile as if they are enjoying it. They laugh when they say ‘business is bad’ as if they enjoy it when they must be concerned. Thus in order to experience hurt, the insult must penetrate this wall of denial that is usually quite strong. When you smile at what is said is hurtful you are trying to fake what is hurtful is likeable and your force of self preservation must be stirred to be faked in command when you smile in hurt. Thus in order for you to feel hurt, this artificial for show rise in strength of the force of self preservation that is needed to fake liking must be precipitously reduced and it is this sudden extreme drop in the strength of the force of self preservation that makes the hurt sharp compared with the dull hurt in sadness where the force of self preservation is present but merely listless, responding weakly like glowing ambers to the stoking force of going against self.
A major reason people smile is not because they are happy but to fake they like what you said or did that they may even dislike and that means they must artificially stir their force of self preservation to fake as if it is in command of the situation or liking it. Thus in order to experience feeling hurt, this wall of denial perpetrated falsely by the force of self preservation must be swiftly rudely penetrated and when it is, the hurt is searing.
THUS IN POSTULATING THE ABOVE I MAY HAVE FINALLY ARRIVED AT THE TRUE NATURE OF EMOTIONS THAT ARE DERIVED FROM LIKE AND DISLIKE, FEAR, SADNESS AND FEELING HURT.
Bullshit:
I had put up a notice on my clinic stating ‘A cure for restlessness’ in which I essentially said that ordinary people suffer from restlessness because there is constant unnecessary stretching, changing speed and loudness in their speech and motion.
Someone was irate enough to scribble ‘bullshit’, ‘emotions and expressing are natural and not robotic or something to this effect because it was not very coherent’.
Such a person is unrighteous. What I put up is on my property, I am not scolding or insulting people who are restless but merely pointing out the cause of restlessness and its cure intended for people who might be distressed by restlessness and if you disagree you do not deface my property, you just keep your opinion and emotion to yourself but as a result of publicly making known your views, you are promoting others to adopt your views and you are foolishly unnecessarily inviting judgment for unlawfully defacing others’ property and encouraging others who may lead to adopt your defiance.
If emotions and expressing leads to uncontrollable everlasting torment and even another eternity of wandering, falling into the furnace of fire you are putting your head on the chopper board by being so rude and defiant.
Reason will not advocate such a riposte but it is emotion, he disliked what he read so much he could not restrain himself to lash out and by so doing he unwittingly do not realize he is confirming himself as a robot who automatically reacts in a certain way just as a crab will always snap at a stick poke into its lair.
What he is doing is attacking me without provocation because what I said was not specifically directed at him but to people who might be distressed and he has false perception to take it personally. If you are not suffering from stress and restlessness, why do you get angry to attack me and defend emotions and expressing?
So just as this is a rabid inappropriate attack on me in which I am largely if not totally blameless, in the same way, the woman may be un-righteously attacking me in a couched way to invite me to attack her by asking, ‘why are you so rude?’
Jesus did not face a global audience. If he was to perform a miracle today, bring someone back to life, he would be inundated buy requests with people bringing dead relatives from all over the world for him to bring back to life and if he did not agree, they might accuse him of being a fake and attack him. Just as they can attack Jesus, pin a false charge on him and kill him, even so the counsellor that Jesus described as the spirit of truth whom the world cannot receive because they neither see nor know him will be attacked and even killed for no reason if he was to attain a public posture like a Mandela.
I may not be the counsellor Jesus described but if I happen to be then Jesus said whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this Age or the Age to come. If being fed to the lions is fun to you then stick out your tongue and attack others. By the Buddha’s criteria stated in many places in different forms, I am a noble person and he said that those who scoff at noble ones (disagreeing is scoffing) are headed for perdition.
THE NOTICE IS NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED TO HIM, WAS NOT STUCK ON HIS HOUSE BUT IT WAS PLACED IN MY PREMISES FOR THOSE WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN A CURE FOR RESTLESSNESS WHERE THERE WAS NONE BEFORE AND SO HE HAS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION AND INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR TO TAKE ATTACK ME DRIVEN BY EMOTIONS HE DOES NOT REALIZE WILL DRIVE HIM TO HELL. YOU HAVE NOT GONE TO HELL YET SO DON’T BE SO SURE IT MIGHT BE QUITE TOLERABLE. IF YOU LOOK AROUND THERE IS PLENTY OF EVIDENCE OF HORRIFYING SUFFERING, DON’T TEMPT FATE, DON’T AFTERWARDS REGRET AS THE BUDDHA SAID.
TO DESCRIBE WHAT I STATE AS BULLSHIT IS NOT A REASONED REJECTION BUT AN EMOTIONAL SCOFFING. WHAT I SAY MAY BE WRONG OR FALSE BUT IT IS NOT EXCREMENT EXCEPT IN YOUR FALSE PERCEPTION THAT THERE IS EXCREMENT IN THE WRITING ON A PIECE OF PAPER. IF IT TURNS OUT TO BE THE ONLY ANSWER TO THE RESTLESSNESS THAT WILL TORMENT YOU AND DRIVE YOU UP A WAY, YOU MAY BE COMMITTING YOURSELF TO EVEN MANY EONS OF SUFFERING AND BY YOURSELF YOU WILL NEVER FIND THE SIMPLE ANSWER TO YOUR RESTLESSNESS RIGHT BEFORE YOUR EYES AND EARS, NAMELY YOUR STRETCHING, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS.
THAT VERY FORCE THAT YOU USE TO SAY BULLSHIT (OR SPIT AT ANOTHER) IS THE VERY FORCE AND SWORD THAT WILL TURNED INWARDS INTO YOUR OWN THROAT TO SWALLOW AND WHEN IT IS FINALLY DONE YOU WILL WEEP AND GNASH YOUR TEETH.
Sticking his neck out:
The notice is not addressed to anyone in particular so he has advanced false perception to take it personally and attack another.
There is nothing attacking in my short displayed message that says the only reason why people suffer restlessness is because there is constant stretching, changing of speed and loudness that can be permanently eliminated if he quit doing so. He is attacking me inappropriately by calling what I say bullshit.
There is no bullshit in what I write. It may be false or wrong but it is not bullshit. If it turns out to be the truth, the only way out of stress, restlessness that will kill you and consign you to another eternity of oblivion and by yourself you will never discover this escape from the torment of stress and restlessness, you are committing yourself to everlasting torment.
A person who is happy will not attack another and it is only a stressed, derisive person who wants to work himself and others up unnecessarily who will attack another.
HE WILL BE PUNISHED NOT JUST FOR ATTACKING ME BY LABELLING WHAT I SAY AS BULLSHIT BUT ATTACKING ME WITHOUT PROVOCATION ON MY PART.
HE WILL BE PUNISHED FOR DEFACING MY PROPERTY.
HE WILL BE PUNISHED BY CASTING ME IN BAD LIGHT FOR THOSE WHO WILL SUBSEQUENTLY READ IT, OF ADVOCATING TO OTHERS THE WAY TO RUIN IF IN TRUTH HIS WAY IS THE WAY TO RUIN.
Driving too fast is relative:
Driving too fast is relative. 100 kph is not too fast on a highway but it is if it is a narrow or crowded street or the car in front is too close for you to stop in time. Thus you do not have to be driving flat out to be going too fast.
In the same way you do not have to be behaving flat out to experience disliking but if depending on the circumstances the force of going against self is excessive or your force of self preservation is jaded then it will struggle to keep pace with your force of going against self even at mild to moderate levels of activity, it is experienced as disliked. For instance just to get up from the couch to go to the fridge is experienced as dislike if you are tired because it means stirring up your despondent force of self preservation to supervise your force of going against self to go to the fridge to get a drink.
If your force of self preservation is fresh, alert and fully in control no matter how frenetic the force of going against self is acting, it is experienced as liking.
Liking can be reversed:
What is liked eg certain tunes can be disliked if you are stressed or distracted or sad.
What is liked can be converted to hate. For instance the wife you so liked or lusted in the past can be now bitterly hated.
This is an indication that liking and disliking are false or contrived or manufactured because what is true will always remain true and therefore the same.
IT IS NOT NECESSARY THAT THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS ACTING FLAT OUT THAT THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IS STRUGGLING TO CONTAIN IT AND THEREFORE DISLIKING IT BUT EVEN AT LOW LEVELS OF ACTIVITY OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF, DEPENDING ON THE DISPOSITION OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION IT MAY STRUGGLE TO CONTROL AND THEREFORE LEAD TO DISLIKE.
WHAT IS TRUE WILL ALWAYS BE TRUE:
WHAT IS TRUE OR DID HAPPEN WILL ALWAYS BE TRUE OR ALWAYS DID HAPPEN AND THEREFORE UNCHANGED BUT WHATEVER IS FALSE OR FAKED OR FORCED OR FORCEFUL CAN BE CHANGED AND WILL CHANGE EVEN TO THE OPPOSITE BY CHANGING THE APPLICATION OF FORCE. BECAUSE WHATEVER IS FALSE NEEDS NO REASON TO CHANGE IT CAN CHANGE ANYTIME. LIKE OR LUST CAN TURN TO HATE BUT LOVING KINDNESS THAT IS TRUE CANNOT TURN TO HATE BECAUSE THERE IS NO FORCE BUT FORCE FREE REASON IN LOVING KINDNESS TO TURN TO HATE.
Liking did not happen:
Liking is merely one manner of force change and disliking the opposite manner of force change that only lasts as long as they last leaving nothing meaningful. Every episode of liking involves the same or similar force changes so what is so meaningful or specific about each episode of liking except that it for show, last as long as it is experienced without benefit.
Liking did not truly happened but it merely appeared to happen because it was merely a manner or changeable style in which your force of going against self stirred well under the control of your force of self preservation when you perceived that person. If on another occasion your force of going against self stirred poorly under the control of your force of self preservation (perhaps due to circumstances that may be beyond your control) when you perceived that person that is disliking that will have happened instead. Thus no matter how a man likes a woman, there are occasions when he dislikes and hide his dislike for her and fakes he liked.
Should you will yourself to dislike the person by repetitively applying excessive force beyond the control of your force of self preservation when perceiving that person you increasingly condition yourself to hate that person.
Resentment:
Does the words “A cure for restlessness” provokes or attacks the reader?
Is ‘the reason why people suffer from stress, restlessness and distraction is because they constantly use force to prolong, change speed and loudness’ provocative or attacking?
It is not provoking but attacking me to say what I say is “bullshit”.
If what I say is not provocative or attacking, why is he attacking me? Is he mad or is there some other reason?
He is not mad but headed for madness because he disliked what I am saying, if there is a Viagra pill for restlessness or a surgical treatment for restlessness he might like or be attracted to it. He is attacking me because of resentment, dislike for what I said. Because dislike is not based on reason but based on the stirring of mental force, no reason is necessary for him to attack me. Because he is constantly attacking others with his style, with the added force in whatever he sees, hears, thinks, speaks and does, this instance is just an extension of the attitude of attacking he does not realize will end in madness.
Whether what I say is true or false can be objectively proven. I can demonstrate the stretching, speed and loudness changes wherever they occur and it is impossible for those who discern to confuse speech with and without stretching, changing speed and loudness.
I know stretching, speed and loudness changes is the only sources of stress, restlessness and distraction because by stopping them I enjoy freedom from stress, restlessness and distraction and by mimicking stylish speech I experience rising stress, restlessness and distraction.
Because there is God, there is life after death and eternal punishment, if you call truth bullshit you are headed even for the furnace where men will weep and gnash their teeth.
Fear:
What always happens when people become fearful or are seized with fear?
When people are fearful they become hesitant (not sure what to do or say) or they drop what they are doing or saying and if very panicky they even run away with accelerating speed and force from the source of the fear.
No thinking or reasoning is involved but they automatically drop what they do and run. They never say I shall now drop what I am doing and I shall now run but seized by fear they drop what they do and run helter-skelter.
Imagine you are doing something and suddenly there is a loud explosion nearby or the building shakes violently from an unexpected earthquake. People usually drop what they are doing and have an urge to run away. Whilst they might think about what has happened, the emotion of fear needs no thinking but it rises violently irresistibly and the net effect is to compel the person to stop what he is doing which is always propelled by his force of going against self and run away which is going in the reverse direction of what he doing. The force (not reason) that causes him to drop what he is doing and run must be a force that acts opposite the force driving what he is doing and therefore fear is emotion experienced when the force of self preservation which always acts opposite the force of going against self which always drives all the person's activities, rises rapidly in speed and strength whilst the force of going against self drops even plunges in speed and strength in reaction to something threatening that has happened. Running away is a fear driven reaction because the force of self preservation always acts opposite the force of going against self that causes the person to proceed or go forwards with what he is doing and thus when the force of self preservation is ascendant, it cause the person first to drop what he is doing and then go in the opposite direction to what he is doing and that de facto is running away. It is all mindlessly orchestrated by force without need for reasoning, although reasoning can guide the decisions in those who are calm and clearly thinking.
Imagine yourself driving quite fast and you see quite late a barricade on the road. What do you do? You remove your foot from the accelerator and slam on the brakes to bring the car to a rapid premature halt. Taking the foot off the accelerator is akin to a drop in the strength and speed of the force of going against self whilst slamming on the brakes is akin to a sudden rise in speed and strength of the force of self preservation that causes the car to stop what it was previously doing.
THUS THE EMOTION OF FEAR HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH REASON BUT IT HAPPENS DIRECTLY ON THE PERCEPTION OF DANGER WHEN THERE IS A IMMEDIATE DROP IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF COUPLED WITH A RISE IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF THE FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF TO CAUSE THE PERSON TO STOP WHAT HE IS DOING AND BECAUSE THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION ALWAYS ACTS IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION, IT CAUSES THE PERSON TO RUN AWAY OR REVERSE THE FORWARD DOING WHAT HE IS DOING DIRECTION.
Feeling hurt:
Feeling hurt is actually the opposite of fear in which there is a rapid rise in the force of going against self coupled with a rapid fall in strength of the force of self preservation so that the unshielded or naked application of force by the force of going against self causes a sudden, sharp stab of pain or hurt.
The reason hurt is so sharp and searing is because people are in permanent denial of hurt (in the form of stress created by self and others and specific insults and nasty actions by others) that are constantly bombarding them. They not only pretend they are not hurt but they pretend they enjoy or like their hurt by smiling and talking as if they are not only unfazed or delighting in your insult. This faked liking demands a contrived or unnatural active dominant force of self preservation that because it is unnatural, can be breached and thus in feeling hurt this unnatural contrived strongly acting force of self preservation is finally breached so that it drops precipitously in speed and strength allowing the now unopposed force of going against self to rise rapidly to act nakedly on the consciousness causing a shearing pain that he struggles to hide in shame from others.
(There are few opportunities for true liking in this world like getting a pay rise, a new car, clothes and people are faking they like just to get along and impress others. When they smile at what you say it is not that they really like or understand what you say but to fake they do, they fake they are happy and confident, they are very knowledgeable and they fake they are happy when they are hurt and thus in order for this person to feel hurt the constantly aroused force of self preservation that is required to fake liking must first be deflated and it is this unceremonious deflation against their wishes finally exposing their consciousness to the naked force of going against self that makes feeling hurt so pungent. Once they come face to face with this hurt so long denied, they find it hard not to attack their tormentor and they lash out almost beyond control)
Shame is actually a form of feeling hurt regarding self rather than simply dislike or hate (focussed dislike) for self. Because they are constantly prostituting themselves in the pleasing and impressing others, stylish people must hate themselves which they deny by experiencing and expressing overblown pride or liking for themselves that becomes constant, only the intensity varies. Because pride is constant and it is liking which requires an active force of self preservation, for the person to experience shame, his pride must be dented and therefore his force of self preservation must desert him and it is this precipitous plunge in speed and strength of his force of self preservation exposing his consciousness to the naked unprotected force of going against self that causes the hurt of shame.
Sadness:
Sadness is the emotion experienced when the person's force of self preservation is overstrained, exhausted and listless, it rises half heartedly or in a token fashion to whatever is going on leaving the force of going against self little supervised free action that exposes the consciousness to naked unopposed force whose effect is to cause pain.
People who are sad often say they have lost all interest and fear because their force of self preservation is moribund and you need an ascendant force of self preservation to experience interest or liking and fear.
Disliking:
Disliking is when the person's force of going against self is fully mobilized but it is struggling to control the rampant force of going against self like the owner being tugged along by his pet dog that has got excited by the presence of another dog.
Disliking can range from mild boredom or being turned off to detesting and it need not be only when the force of going against self is very potent that dislike is felt but at whatever strength of the force of going against self, so long as the force of self preservation is struggling to control, it is experienced as dislike.
Liking:
Whenever in whatever activity the person undertakes, the force of self preservation is fully in control of the force of going against self the consciousness experiences liking for what it is perceiving or undertaking.
Because liking and disliking are false and stressful, it can both occur in reaction to the same object. The same song that one likes very much can be loathsome or disliked if one was sad or stressed. The son that you like or is so proud of can become irritating or disliked as a result of his pestering behaviour. The like not love you have for a girl can turn to implacable hate or dislike if you feel jilted.
Emotions: All the emotions like excitement, lust, greed, covetousness, anger, hate, pride, shame, envy, jealousy are actually forms of like and dislike in different occasions and guises.
THUS ALL THE EMOTIONS THAT INCLUDE FEAR, SADNESS AND FEELING HURT ARE DETERMINED BY THE RELATIVE STRENGTHS OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION AND FORCE OF GOING AGAINST. DEPENDING ON THEIR RELATIVE STRENGTHS AGAINST EACH OTHER THE PERSON EXPERIENCES LIKE, DISLIKE, SADNESS, HURT OR FEAR.
All fabricating is against self:
The Buddha said that from the cessation of ignorance (enlightenment) as a requisite comes the cessation of fabrications (activities of the mind that can only be perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing) and from the cessation of fabrications come the cessation of consciousness.
The enlightened stops all fabricating that is always going against self and harmful and must be driven by force that harms the mind. Because fabricating (perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing) harms the mind, the force that drive fabrications is called the force of going against self even if you cannot see that you are doing so and you even think you are benefiting yourself and others.
THE VITAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEINGS HERE, A REALM OF ILL WILL AND BEINGS IN HEAVEN IS THAT BEINGS HERE (INCLUDING ANIMALS) ALL FABRICATE WITH STYLE WHICH REQUIRE THE USE OF EXCESSIVE UNNECESSARY FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE AND EVEN DIRECTION WHERE POSSIBLE WHEREAS BEINGS IN HEAVEN FABRICATE WITHOUT STYLE, WITHOUT USING FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH.
THUS IF YOU STOP SPEAKING, STIOP THINKING (SOMETHING THE BUDDHA SAID IS POSSIBLE) BUT YOU MERELY PERCEIVE WHAT IS GOING ON, YOU ARE FABRICATING LESS AND SUFFERING LESS AND THAT ACCORDS THAT BEING TWO EONS OR AGES IN HEAVEN.
IF IN ADDITION TO STOP THINKING YOU ALSO STOP PERCEIVING TO BECOME NEITHER PERCEIVING NOR NOT PERCEIVING THE BUDDHA SAID THAT IS EVEN HIGHER THAN NO THINKING AND ACCORDS MUCH LONGER LIFESPANS IN HEAVENLY BLISS.
Emotional robots:
Much as they like to overrate themselves beings here are slaves of their emotions that are generated by the way they use excessive force to project their styles which is little more than how they differ in using force to prolong, change speed, direction and force in the name of impressing, pleasing, intimidating and dominating others. Depending on how strong and fast their force of going against self is compared to their force of self preservation they experience the whole gamut of emotions from like and dislike and emotions derived from them, sadness, feeling hurt and fear.
How and what they perceive, think, speak and do is also not fresh specific to each occasion but painstakingly recorded into and regurgitated from their mental jukeboxes. Stylish people have an obsession that is almost impossible to placate that they must painstakingly record and play back by recall whatever and how they want to perceive, think, speak and do things.
Whatever true reasoning they have is rudimentary or nonexistent.
What they call their reasoning is their mental libraries of explanations of why things happen that may not be true that they copied from society and their parents and whenever something happens that require explaining, they take snapshots and consult their mental libraries and having found a suitable explanation they move off or they shrug their shoulders and move on.
What remains is that they have a consciousness that acts as the voyeur experiencing all the emotions churned up, the sight, sounds and smells of things happening and a disc jockey directing which jukebox sequences to activate and when to switch tracks.
IT IS BECAUSE ORDINARY PEOPLE ARE PREPROGRAMMED ROBOTS THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANY AMONGST THEM TO BECOME A BUDDHA OR JESUS AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ORDINARY PEOPLE TO MATCH THE DESCRIPTION JESUS GAVE FOR THE COUNSELOR.
CAN A ROBOT PERCEIVE AND SAY OR DO THINGS THAT IT HAS NOT BE PROGRAMMED TO? IF IT CANNOT THEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE IF THEY ARE INDEED HIGLY SOPHISTICATED BIOLOGICAL ROBOTS TO PERCEIVE, THINK AND SAY THINGS THAT THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN PROGRAMMED TO AND THEREFORE THERE IS NO DANGER ANY AMONGST THEM CAN SPONTANEOUSLY BECOME A BUDDHA OR JESUS.

ALL EMOTIONS INCLUDING LIKE AND FEAR ARE SUFFERING NEVER THE PLEASURE IT IS MADE OUT TO BE AND THERE IS ONLY ONE CAUSE FOR THE TOTALLY UNNECESSARY SUFFERING OF BEINGS HERE AND IT IS THEIR CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROJECT STYLE, TO FORCEFULLY PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN THE NAME OF IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING AND DOMINATING OTHERS, GIVING RISE TO EMOTIONS (LIKE AND DISLIKE, SADNESS, FEELING HURT AND FEAR), STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION (CANNOT CONCENTRATE) AND THERE IS ONLY ONE CURE NAMELY PAYING ATTENTION TO DETECT AND MAKING PERSISTENT EFFORT TO STOP ALL STRETCHING 9OF SYLLABLES), CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS. WHOEVER IS THE COUNSELOR JESUS DESCRIBED MUST ALSO SAY THIS TO BENEFIT YOU AND IF I HAVE DONE SO I HAVE SUPERSEDED HIM.
What I say must be true because I can demonstrate the stretching, speed and loudness changes in the speech of everyone here and how different their speech will be otherwise. If I tried to imitate their styles I experience emotions, stress, restlessness and distraction and by exiting my style in the past I experience a freedom from emotions, stress, restlessness and distraction.
Because all beings here are suffering from stress, restlessness and distraction if what I say holds true only for me, namely only I can permanently exit stress, restlessness and distraction by not stretching, changing speed and loudness, I must be an even more unique out of this world being.
Even though robotic existence beset by emotions, stress, restlessness and distraction is tormenting even to mind bending proportions and lead with final loss of control to mad rote behaviour, mad emotions, mad violence, mad stress, mad restlessness and distraction, mad logic and perceptions, there are many who are absorbed in this world, defiant and don’t care for others except hypocritically or they do not believe the horrendous and everlasting suffering awaiting them.
Wanting to divide:
No matter how wonderful you think your style is, it must divide your and the other person’s attention. Because style is about force, is forceful, it forcefully divides and if you keep using force to cut, finally the rope will be cut or divided and you will go mad.
If you speak angrily the other person must pay attention to how you are saying it and what you are saying it and irritated, often they just switch off and pretend they heard.
If you speak ‘so gently’ the person must pay attention to your so gentle way (and ask what is the motive) and pay attention to what you are saying so gently.
If you keep wanting to divide yours and others’ attention with your style your wish may be fulfilled when your mind becomes permanently divided.
Hence you are a fool and a pervert if you think the angry, sarcastic, funny, anxious or gentle way you speak is good for yourself and others.
Disguised nastiness rather than rare is rampant in this world. Most people in this world have learnt to say what is nasty or bad news to the recipients in a fabricated gentle way and a smile that conceal their intent and secret relishing of your misery. Your gentle style is not only worthless but will count against you in terms of judgment whilst you are wasting energy to create conditioning stress, restlessness and distraction to fabricate gentleness.
How much weeping & gnashing?
Jesus: Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the close of the age. The Son of man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all evildoers and throw them into the furnace of fire; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.
Even the maidens who came but forgot to bring oil will not be accepted even after they then got oil.
How much weeping will goats expect?
If you expect just a few buckets full of tears you may be foolish. The Buddha said you have already shed tears greater than the four great oceans, so the weeping is likely to be serious. Again the Buddha said you have already shed your own blood greater than the four great oceans from having your heads chopped as men and animals and so the gnashing too will be serious.
Starting arguments is addictive:
First you force yourself to start arguments because despite the emotion to defend and uphold yourself, getting into arguments is potentially dangerous and stressful but increasingly you develop an irresistible urge to argue, to bite back just as a crab automatically snaps at a rod poked into its lair. And one day, sooner or later you will get into trouble by arguing with someone who can really punish you or the urge to argue will turn virulent, completely inappropriate.
Because I am not the person who goes around looking for a fight or trouble or an argument, I usually evade trouble I find it hard to believe that people will go out of the way to provoke arguments that they feel they can win and browbeat the other person so it escaped my realization that it is not an accident she asked me a question instead of plainly stating that I am rude that requires no reply and thence potential argument from me. She was probably actively seeking for me to get drawn in to defend myself allowing her the opportunity to castigate me regarding my alleged rudeness.
STARTING ARGUMENTS ARE NEVER BASED ON REASON BECAUSE REASON WILL TELL YOU THAT YOU JUST STATE YOUR CASE AND IF THERE IS NO AGREEMENT, YOU JUST PART WAYS BUT EMOTION WILL DRIVE YOU TO IRRATIONALLY ARGUE, TO TRY AND STIR THE OTHER PERSON UP SO THAT HE WILL SUFFER FOR PERCEIVED TRESPASSES ON YOU EVEN IF IT MEANS YOU TOO WILL SUFFER.
IF YOU DO NOT LEARN TO PUT A STOP TO ARGUING, SOMETHING POSSIBLE BUT NEAR IMPOSSIBLE FOR THOSE WITH STRONG FORCES OF GOING AGAINST SELF, YOU ARE HEADED FOR THE CLIFF NOT SAFETY.
The difference between an attack & looking for a fight:
When you attack someone, it is one direction flow of force perhaps as a result of perceived provocation and usually it stops at that and the person does not expect or desire retaliation. Thus when a person scolds another that he is rude, he is attacking that person and it is not necessarily that he expects or desires retaliation but he just wants to give you a piece of his mind.
When you are looking for a fight, you invite or want the person to retaliate so that you can prolong and aggravate your attacks usually because you think you have the upper hand or he is at your mercy. Thus by asking me a question, why are you so rude you are inviting me to reply that usually means retaliate so that you can extend the attack.
When a person says ‘make my day’ he means you cannot win, you are at his mercy so don’t try anything to retaliate. Usually bullies will pick someone they think they can attack with impunity so that victory is assured and they gather another feather of victory in their cap.
Those people who are experienced in engaging others in combat are usually experts in controlling their forces of going against self such that they can attack you with great controlled aggression in a masked gentle or joking way as if they are only teasing you or concerned for you.
If you have never or rarely attacked others before, you will mount your attack shakily and find it hard to camouflage your attack so as to appear as if it is not an attack, the other person is too sensitive to perceive it as an attack.
To attack someone is a sin but to look for a fight, inviting the other to retaliate so that you can prolong the attack is greater sin and to mask or camouflage your invitation to a fight as if you are only joking or friendly is even worse.
ATTACKING ANOTHER IS SIN.
TO LOOK FOR A FIGHT INVITING THE OTHER TO RETALIATE IS WORSE.
TO LOOK FOR A FIGHT IN A CAMOUFLAGED AS IF JOKING OR GENTLE WAY IS THE WORST WITH COMMENSURATE DIVINE PUNISHMENT.
Shifting from one tense posture to another:
All ordinary people who have style or go against themselves have resident tension and restlessness that make them abhor assuming postures that are truly neutral and offer the least stress or tension. It is their tension that forces them to assume inherently tensed postures like holding their arms tensely folded across their chests and when that become too uncomfortably, they shift to folding their hands behind the back of their heads than to keep a arm astride the car window sill but they never allow their arms to flop effortlessly besides their bodies.
They tilt their bodies and heads to one side that makes gravity act lopsided on them causing them to want to fall but never sit upright in a most easeful gravity neutral position because their innate tension does not permit that. They prop their feet against the edge of the table instead of upright on the floor or cross legged in a lotus position. Through it all it is their resident idling tension and restlessness that is dictating what tension maintaining postures they assume that will control but never release their tensions and when the tensions in those positions become to unbearable they are forced by their tension to assume another tension creating position for a change in an agonizing state of existence of struggling to maintain control that is ultimately doomed to loss of control and some insane self or other harming act.
Challenging to a fight is inciting others to sin:
When you attack a person only you have sinned, the attacked person did not sin but if you challenge or invite another to attack you, not because you are so good, but because you are a bully perceiving easy meat and you want to prolong your attack, you are inviting him to attack you so that he too has now sinned, and conditioned himself to fight in the future and that is greater sin than just attacking someone.
The Tricks & Thrills Of Getting Into Arguments:
TO LOOK FOR A VERBAL FIGHT (ARGUMENT) AND YET APPEAR NOT TO BE LOOKING FOR A FIGHT BUT INSTEAD TO MAKE IT APPEAR THAT IT IS THE OTHER PERSON WHO WAS LOOKING FOR A FIGHT OR STARTED THE FIGHT IS A SIGN OF A CONSUMMATE FIGHTER OR PROVOCATEUR, THE ULTIMATE CHICHANERY. THUS IT IS NOT A SIGN OF INNOCENCE OR THAT I WAS READING TOO MUCH INTO HER QUESTION 'WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE' IN THINKING SHE WAS TRYING TO PROVOKE ME INTO A VERBAL FIGHT BUT THE TRUTH MAY BE OR IS THAT SHE WAS (SECRETLY) TRYING TO PROVOKE ME TO ARGUE WITH HER PERHAPS BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD AT ARGUING AND GET KICKS OUT OF VERBAL FIGHTING OR SHE LIKES TO MAKE OTHERS ANGRY BECAUSE SHE KNOWS THAT IS SUFFERING AND SHE ENJOYS MAKING OTHERS SUFFER AND HER COOLNESS IN ASKING THE QUESTION IS NOT A SIGN OF INNOCENCE BUT A SIGN SHE IS AN EXPERT FIGHTER WHO CAN TURN THINGS AROUND IF ACCUSED OF STARTING A FIGHT TO RUB MORE SALT INTO YOUR WOUND BY SAYING SHE MERELY ASKED AN INNOCENT QUESTION BUT YOU BLEW UP. THE SELF AND OTHER DECEIT IS SO REAL THAT OFTEN THE PERSON FEELS WITH EVEN GREAT OUTRAGE THAT SHE HAS BEEN WRONGED, SHE MERELY ASKED A GOOD NATURED QUESTION BUT INSTEAD YOU RUDELY BLEW UP AT HER.
ROBIN GIBB OF THE BEE GEES WAS NOTORIOUS FOR STARTING FIRES AT HOME AND IN PUBLIC PLACES AND THE SIGN OF AN EXPERT FIRE STARTER & ONE OF ITS THRILLS IS TO START THE FIRE WITHOUT OTHERS KNOWING YOU STARTED IT (GET AWAY WITH IT) OR MAKE IT APPEAR SOMEONE ELSE STARTED IT (BLAME IT ON SOMEONE ELSE).
THUS THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO NOT ONLY RELISH STARTING ARGUMENTS BUT THEY START THE ARGUMENTS IN SUBTLE WAYS TO MAKE IT APPEAR AS IF THEY ARE NOT PROVOCATIVE AND WHEN THE OTHER PERSON GET SUCKED IN AND BLOW UP, PART OF THE THRILL IS TO HEAP THE BLAME FOR STARTING IT ON HIM, SAYING I ONLY ASKED AN INNOCENT QUESTION, 'WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE', WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH YOU, CAN'T YOU JUST ANSWER A SIMPLE QUESTION IN A CIVILIZED MANNER WITHOUT GETTING ANGRY AND RUDE? THUS FOOLISH BYSTANDERS MAY BE RECRUITED TO HEAP THE BLAME FOR THE ARGUMENT ON ME RATHER THAN HER.
THE GOAT WHO DIRECTLY PROVOKES ANOTHER WILL BE PUNISHED GREATLY BY KARMA BUT THE GOAT WHO PROVOKES INDIRECTLY SO AS TO MAKE THE OTHER APPEAR TO BE THE PROVOCATUER IS HEADING FOR EVEN GREATER TORMENT.
It is stressful, restless and distracting to put on a show, smile, have style, stretch syllables, change speed and loudness yet why do people do it all the time? They do it all the time for many reasons, partly because they cannot help it, their endemic stress, restlessness and distraction seizes them to continue to stretch, change speed and loudness, there is purpose and it is to please, impress, intimidate and dominate others.
In the same way although arguing is stressful, can lead to physical fights and injury even death, there are motivations for arguing apart from the fact that it is a mindless addiction that drives people rather than they being masters of their arguing.
In a sense it is true that there is no reason for people to argue because arguments are never guided by reason but they are always driven blindly by force or emotions and therefore it is true people have no reasons to argue but they have emotions or force or motivations (only force can motivate, reason can only guide) to argue.
One of the main purposes of getting into arguments is to inflict as much suffering in as many ways as possible on the adversary and to also make him deceived that you are not suffering but even enjoying it. Towards this goal, if you blame him for starting it when you started it, you can make him look to bystanders like the aggressor when you are the aggressor so that they can join in to cast stones at him, you have to maintain a tight control on your aggression so that you appear as innocent, unfazed and even enjoying it as much as possible (eg smile throughout) and it also permit you to better direct your attacks (a person overwhelmed by emotions cannot direct his attacks as well as a person who tenaciously controls his attacking impulses) Thus the calm gentle manner belies his intentions, is not a sign he is innocent or a reluctant participant in arguments but the opposite, he is a consummate arguer.
Another aim in starting arguments is to dominate or intimidate the other person, to win or impose that your side of the argument is right and he is wrong and ultimately you are good and he is bad. This is seldom achieved because the other side is unlikely to concede.
It is pride and self identity views that forces people to adopt positions in various issues (eg what is rude and what is not rude) that they will defend even at all costs.
Yet another drive for arguing is mad, arguing is addictive and increasingly the person is drawn into arguments irresistibly and finally he will be madly argumentative even with himself. In her senility my mother would frequently argue with voices in her head, challenging and scolding them and those who like to argue do not realize there may be hell of nonstop arguing waiting for them in old age and in hell after they depart.
Just as the hallmark of a good drinker, a yardstick by which a drinker uses to boast about is his capacity to take in alcohol without getting drunk or incapacitated and the more frequent or longer a drinker has been drinking, the greater his capacity to absorb alcohol, similarly a measure of someone who is good at arguing (a requirement for some professions like trial lawyers and salesmen) is his ability to control his aggression whilst he argues so that he appears unruffled whilst he tries as much as possible to make his adversary lose his cool which would be a sign of defeat and the more experienced a person is at arguing, the better he is at arguing or verbally attacking others without appearing flustered. The longer he can comfortably argue without retreat, whilst he makes the other person flustered and retreat is a goal of arguing in lieu of convincing the other person he is wrong.
UNLESS SHE IS VERY STUPID, SHE WAS DEFINITELY TRYING TO PROVOKE ME INTO AN ARGUMENT BY ASKING ME AN INCENDIARY QUESTION ‘WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE’ CALCULATED TO AROUSE EMOTION IN PEOPLE WHO ARE EMOTIONAL OR PROUD AND THE FACT THAT SHE SAID IT QUITE CALMLY DOES NOT INDICATE GOODWILL BUT VEILED ILL WILL TO STAB ME IN THE BACK NOT FRONTALLY.
ONCE I GET PROVOKED INTO AN ARGUMENT, SHE MAY BE ABLE TO USE HER EXPERTISE AT ARGUING TO SPECIFICALLY CUT ME TO PIECES BIT BY BIT BY POINTING OUT A LITANY OF FAULTS THAT CONSTITUTE MY RUDENESS INSTEAD OF FLAT SCOLDING ME FOR BEING RUDE.
Challenging & Daring Others:
Many people do not realizing they are challenging or daring others which is inviting others to attack them that is compounding their sins.
For instance, instead of crossing the road they swagger across or walk along the road daring motorists to knock them down. Because they intentionally do that, their actions in swaggering or walking along the road is attacking others and by intending others to knock them down they are also throwing a challenge to others to sin.
Depending on what the person has in mind when he spits, he may be spitting just to attack the other person or spitting to both attack and challenge the other person to attack him and start a fight.
Similarly goats engage in staring contests in which they are sometimes attacking and sometimes challenging others to a fight.
Often people are unaware they are attacking and challenging others. If you are challenging others and you are unaware, aren’t you a person who does not know what he is doing and you are a robot automatically rendering your challenging by rote without awareness?
It is not unavoidable to like or dislike:
It is not that I like yesterday’s songs (my mental force stirred in an attractive way) and dislike today’s songs (my mental force stirred repulsively) but I find yesterday’s songs pleasant on contact and today’s songs unpleasant on contact.
Thus I did not like or dislike, did not exercise my mental force and therefore did not suffer stress, restlessness and distraction that is compulsory if one liked or disliked that has nothing to do with reason but everything to do with force and if you think it is based on reason you have advanced false perception that will end in madness.
Unconscious falsity:
If you said Robin Gibb is famous for starting fires, what you say is false and sarcastic because a person cannot be famous for something bad but he is notorious for starting fire.
People who are actors never mean what they say or say what they mean in general because their style is false and all about force and nothing to do with meaning, they never say they mean to stress, make you restless and distracted, they never say they mean to impress, please, intimidate and dominate you. What they say are rehashed from jukeboxes and they are robots who cannot mean what they say standardized or pre-recorded.
They are hypocrites in particular because:
They tell lies.
They joke or try to treat everything as a joke and truth is never funny and what is funny is never the truth.
They are sarcastic, they mean the opposite of what they say.
They speak nonsense like yabadabadoo, uh oh, phew, Jeez etc that is meaningless or false.
They speak falsities without realize they do so. ‘Deafening silence’ is always false because silence cannot deafen. When you say ‘nothing but’ you are contradicting yourself, you say nothing and then your but says there is something not truly nothing and hence that is unconscious mindless falsity. When you thank me for emails that you never told me you deleted without reading but merely hinted you might have done so, you are speaking unconscious falsity because when you thank someone you are expressing appreciation and surely you cannot be grateful for emails that you delete without reading? “Whose video is it anyway” is an unconscious falsity. If you don’t care as your ‘anyway’ implies why ask another that requires effort to reply?
Surprise is a sign of sin not virtue:
If you never forcefully accept as true what you have no right to accept as true (presume) and you never forceful accept as false or cannot happen what can happen and is true, how can you be surprised by anything. It is only a pretentious person who pretends what cannot happen can happen and what can happen cannot happen can be taken by surprise.
Often surprise is not genuine but faked to deceive others but even if it is genuine surprise it indicates you are a compromised person heading for suffering.
What is the matter with you, I only asked a simple question?
If I had raised my objections to her, she can turn around and further attack me like “what is the matter with you, I only asked a simple question why are you so rude, why can’t you politely answer that question in a civilized fashion?”
That person does not know she is walking on thin ice that will collapse under her. Her question is always false and she is lying to say she only asked a simple question because it cannot be true she wants me to tell her why I am so rude nor does she need anyone else to tell her why I should be rude because she should be able to work it out herself but instead her question is just a ruse to provoke me to get angry.
It is like a person who presents you with a stick of dynamite and the matches and invite you to light it and when you do, she says it is you who lighted it, what is the matter with you, can’t you accept a stick of dynamite and not blow up?
Should a person commit evil, let him not do it again and again. Let him not find pleasure therein, for painful is the accumulation of evil.
So long as an evil deed has not ripened, the fool thinks it as sweet as honey. But when the evil deed ripens, the fool comes to grief.
Have I not convinced you of sin, righteousness and judgment?
Have I not convinced you of sin, righteousness and judgment in a way that no man today or in the past has done?
If I have and what I say is unique I would have superseded the counsellor Jesus described because I have already convinced you. If it is impossible for anyone else to do what the counsellor will do otherwise what Jesus is not the truth, then I must be the counsellor.
You cannot mean what is false:
If what you said can be proven to be false then because you cannot truly mean what is truly false, you must be a hypocrite, whether you know what you said is false or not. If what you said is false and you do not know it, you are a greater fool who does know what he says because if you knew what you said you would have known it was false and not say it if you have conscience.
Thus if you say a sound is funny you are saying something false because a sound can be loud, soft, harsh or musical but it cannot be funny.
Silence cannot be golden because there is no gold in silence but silence can be peaceful or restful.
A court case cannot be thrown out but it can be dismissed or rejected so if you said it was thrown out it is false.
MANY THINGS THAT PEOPLE SAY THAT THEY TAKE FOR GRANTED IS TRUE CAN BE PROVEN TO BE FALSE AND THEY ARE NOT EVEN AWARE THEY ARE FALSE AND EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE YOU CANNOT MEAN WHAT IS FALSE AND YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE. THE FACT THAT YOU ARE NOT AWARE MAKES YOU A GREATER FOOL WHO DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS SAYING. HOW CAN YOU MEAN WHAT YOU DO NOT KNOW THE MEANING OF? SO NEXT TIME YOU SPEAK MAKE SURE YOU KNOW THE MEANING OF WHAT YOU SAY.
WHEN YOU ASK ME WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE, YOU ARE ASKING ME TO GIVE THE REASONS WHY I AM SO RUDE, NOT YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY I AM SO RUDE OR YOU ARE JUST TELLING ME I AM SO RUDE OR WHAT YOU SAY IS DRIVEN BY CONCERN FOR ME.
A saree is anything but just a piece of cloth:
Here is another unwitting falsity that people utter and hear without thinking having copied from others.
A saree cannot be God or a car or a fridge so it is not anything and whatever else a saree might be, it is still a piece of cloth.
If you mean what you say you must know the meaning of ‘a saree is anything but a piece of cloth’ and you should know it is false so why did you say it?
Well done Asimo:
I just saw on TV news Asimov the Honda humanoid robot running eagerly on to stage, take a bow, wave, clap his hands and make many gestures just like his human counterparts will and to top it off, he successfully descending down a flight of stairs with reporters looking fascinated.
What Asimo cannot do if you ask him is to run like Marilyn Monroe but if you reprogram him, he may be able to run sexily like Marilyn.
Thus as real and alive as a humanoid robot might appear, he can only perceive what he has been programmed to perceive and do or say what he has been programmed to say. If you want him to perceive, say or do different things you must reprogram him.
This is clear proof that you do not need to be a human being with consciousness and sensate feelings of pain and pleasure to do what most people do like smile, wave, bow and say hello, you can program a mindless, conscious less, unfeeling robot to do so and therefore ordinary people are mere sophisticated robots whose perceptions (how they see and what they see), what & how they think, speak and do are all pre-programmed which they occasionally reprogram and the only difference from Asimov is that in addition they have consciousness, emotions and feelings, they are little more than disc jockeys operating a sophisticated mental jukebox of their activities and voyeurs watching what their robots is perceiving, thinking, saying and doing.
THE REPORTERS WATCHING APPEAR FASCINATED. WHAT THEY DO NOT REALIZE IS THAT THE ROBOT IS TELLING ON THEM, THEY ARE UNWITTINGLY LOOKING AT THEMSELVES WHEN THEY LOOK AT ASIMOV.
Disguising your shots:
In any sport, be it tennis, football or golf, you must learnt how to hit your shots well before you go on to the next step, to disguise your shots so as to deceive your opponents and win points that your normally good shots may not have.
Without having first learnt to hit your shots well you cannot progress to being good at disguising your shots.
Thus the fact that you can disguise your shots, you can disguise your intentions to trick your opponent is a sign of cunning and expertise at what you are doing.
Therefore in an argument, which is largely about finding things to attack another, your ability to disguise your attacks for instance conceal the force that drives your attacks by speaking in a gentle even concerned manner or as if joking is a sign of consummate control of aggression that can only come with repeated practice in the past, is not a sign of an amateur arguer. A person who does not know how to argue will be struggling to control the anger needed to argue and therefore flustered and it is obvious to all he is attacking. To attack in a way that is not obvious is a sign of great professionalism in attacking others.
If I was skilful at arguing I would have retorted as if genuine, “I am rude because I am such a stupid idiot and you are so good, so can you please get the hell out of here?”
I can’t believe he did it:
Here again is an unconscious lie because surely the person can believe something that he knows has happened.
If you truly believe you cannot believe what you can believe you are headed for madness.
The purpose of saying that is to express surprise which is a form of pretence.
What is the use of disguising lousy shots?
If your tennis shots are lousy what is the point in disguising them? Even if you wanted, you cannot disguise your lousy shots because your control of your lousy shots is poor. Only when you have good control of the force of your shots do you and can you disguise them to fool your opponent.
In same way what is the use of disguising your motives or aggression if you are lousy arguer? Only if you are an expert at arguing is it necessary to finesse your skills at provoking and attacking others so that it appears it is the other person who is nasty and as far as you are concerned you were not looking for a fight but undertaking a normal transaction.
An apparent not true paradox:
The paradox that a disc in which everything in it is rotating and yet have a centre that must not rotate because if a centre rotate it must rotate around something and therefore itself cannot be the centre can only be explained if this world does not exist at all but it exists only in the minds of beings trapped in existence.
A CENTRE OF A ROTATING DISC THAT ALSO REVOLVES DOES NOT MAKE SENSE BECAUSE THIS ROTATING CENTRE MUST THEN ROTATE AROUND SOMETHING AND THEREFORE CANNOT BE A CENTRE.
A CENTRE OF A ROTATING DISC THAT DOES NOT ROTATE OR IS ABLE TO NOT ROTATE WHERE EVERYTHING AROUND IT IS ROTATING DOES NOT MAKE SENSE OR IS HARD TO IMAGINE.
IF YOU SAY WHY NOT WITHOUT GIVING AN EXPLANATION HOW THIS MIGHT COME ABOUT BUT INSIST THAT IT JUST IS OR IT NEEDS NO EXPLAINING, THEN YOU ARE A MAN OF EMOTION OR FORCE NOT REASON.
It would be a real paradox if this world existed physically apart from the minds perceiving it but if there is no physical world existing apart from a virtual shared common reality in all perceiving minds, then just as the rotation of the disk does not exist but exists only in the minds of perceiving beings, similarly the contradicting non rotating centre of the disc also only exists in the minds of perceiving beings and thus the fact that there is a paradox of a completely rotating disk but a completely unrotating centre is an indication this world cannot exist in reality but in mind only and this is what the Buddha says because he said this world of existence and changing is false and mind only.
Relatively, to beings immersed in its activities this world is very real but taken to its extreme, this world does not make sense. In other words, if you conveniently ignore or don't take into account that a rotating disc must revolve around an axis that paradoxically must not be revolving, then rotating disc makes sense and is very viable as an independent physical entity existing apart from the minds that perceive it but if you take into account that a revolving disc must revolve around a non revolving centre, then this revolving disc that must have a unrevolving centre is untenable, non viable as a separate entity apart from the minds that perceive it but it is only as a virtual entity that does not exist apart from being in the collective minds of all the beings who exist.
IF THIS WORLD REALLY EXISTS PHYSICALLY, NOT JUST VIRTUALLY IN THE MINDS OF ITS BEINGS, CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A ROTATING DISC WHERE EVERY PART IS ROTATING AROUND A CENTRE TO HAVE A CENTRE THAT MUST NOT AND CANNOT ROTATE?
IF THIS WORLD IS A VIRTUAL WORLD, DOES NOT EXIST BY ITSELF THEN THE DISC THAT ROTATES DOES NOT EXIST EXCEPT VIRTUALLY OR IN THE MINDS OF THOSE WHO PERCEIVE IT AND SIMILARLY THE CENTRE THAT DOES NOT ROTATE DOES NOT ALSO EXIST EXCEPT VIRTUALLY IN THE MINDS OF THOSE WHO PERCEIVE IT AND THE PARADOX IS APPARENT NOT REAL. WHEN THE DISC THAT ROTATES VANISHES FROM THE MIND THAT PERCEIVES, THE CENTRE THAT DOES NOT ROTATE ALSO VANISHES FROM THE MIND THAT PERCEIVES IT, SO WHAT IS THE BIG FUSS OR PARADOX?
IF THIS WORLD EXISTS IN THE MIND ONLY THEN THIS PARADOX EXISTS IN THE MIND ONLY AND WITH THE CESSATION OF THAT MIND THE PARADOX CEASES. IF THIS WORLD AND THE ROTATING DISC IN IT DOES EXISTS APART FROM THE MIND THEN THE PARADOX IS REAL OR IMPOSSIBLE TO EXPLAIN. IF YOU SAY WHY SHOULD IT BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR A INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING ROTATING DISC TO HAVE A NON ROTATING CENTRE WITHOUT EXPLAINING HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE, YOU ARE SPEAKING IRRATIONALLY OUT OF EMOTIONAL RESENTMENT. EXPLAIN TO ME HOW IT IS POSSIBLE FOR A TRULY PHYSICALLY EXISTING ROTATING DISC CAN HAVE A CENTRE THAT MUST NOT ROTATE, DON'T ASSERT THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE WITHOUT OFFERING AN EXPLANATION HOW THIS IS POSSIBLE.
THE PRESENCE EVERYWHERE OF ROTATING DISCS FROM CAR WHEELS, FANS, CD ROMS TO ROTATING PLANETS, SUNS AND GALAXIES THAT HAVE A PARADOXICAL NON ROTATING CENTRE WITH A DISC THAT IS EVERYWHERE ROTATING IS UNWITTING EVIDENCE THIS WORLD IS NOT VIABLE AS A STAND ALONE ENTITY BUT IT CAN ONLY EXISTS IN THE MINDS OF BEINGS.
SIMILARLY YOU CAN KEEP CALCULATING PII (22 DIVIDED BY 7) OR THE CIRCUMFERENCE DIVIDED BY THE RADIUS OF A CIRCLE AND YOU WILL NEVER FIND A FINITE ANSWER BUT THE ANSWER KEEPS EXTENDING ON AND ON AND ON AD INFINITUM.
IMMERSED IN THIS WORLD ITS BEINGS THINK THIS WORLD MAKE SENSE BUT THIS WORLD DOES NOT MAKE SENSE, IT IS AN ILLUSION OF THE MIND JUST AS IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE THAT A ROTATING DISC HAS A CENTRE THAT MUST NOT ROTATE DOES NOT MAKE SENSE NEITHER DOES A DISC THAT HAS A ROTATING CENTRE MAKES SENSE BECAUSE A ROTATING CENTRE MUST ROTATE AROUND SOMETHING AND CANNOT BE A CENTRE.

IF THIS WORLD EXISTS AS A REAL PHYSICAL WORLD THEN THE PARADOX OF A ROTATING DISC WITH A NON ROTATING CENTRE IS A REAL PARADOX, IF THIS WORLD ONLY EXISTS IN THE MIND THEN THE PARADOX IS IN THE MIND ONLY OR FALSE.

JESUS SAID THIS WORLD IS A CREATION (IF YOU HAVE FAITH AS LITTLE AS A MUSTARD SEED, YOU CAN TELL THE MOUNTAIN TO MOVE AND IT SHALL BE DONE) AND THE BUDDHA SAID GOD OR THE FATHER IS THE CREATOR OF ALL THERE IS AND SHALL BE, THE ONLY REASON WHY IT IS POSSIBLE TO WALK ON WATER, FLY THROUGH THE AIR, CREATE LOAVES OF BREAD OUT OF THIN AIR, BRING THE DEAD BACK ALIVE IS THAT AS REAL AS THIS WORLD IS, IT DOES NOT EXISTS AND BECAUSE IT IS A MIND ONLY CREATION ITS RULES CAN BE BROKEN FOR SEEMING MIRACLES TO OCCUR. THE PARADOX OF A REVOLVING DISC THAT HAS A CENTRE THAT DOES NOT REVOLVE IS EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS CORRECT BECAUSE IT IS NO PARADOX IF THE REVOLVING DISC AND ITS PARADOXICALLY UNREVOLVING CENTRE BOTH ONLY EXISTS IN THE MIND ONLY SO THAT IT IS A MIND ONLY PARADOX.
No obligation to explain:
One possible reason why she was crossed with me may be because of the cursory way with which I treated her enquiry about her giddiness that accompanied her flu like symptoms.
People may not appreciate that the causes for giddiness can be quite divers and it takes effort and energy to explain thoroughly what may have been the causes of her giddiness and even after I have done that, there is no guarantee that she will understand and even if she understood, there is no guarantee she will accept my explanations as correct and even if she accepted my explanations are correct, it will not cure her giddiness as medications may alleviate and therefore I have no obligation to explain in detail why she is giddy just because she asked and she is a paying patient. A lack of an explanation is not going to kill her and the provision of an explanation will not cure her although it may assure you but you do not need an explanation why you are giddy to assure you and even if you are given explanations you may not be assured but you can take it on faith if you trust the doctor's assurances which does not require thorough explaining.
The Buddha has been noted to remain silent when asked inappropriate questions, he has no obligation to answer just because you asked it. He said he will only speak if something is not just true but benefits the listener. Hence even if my explanation of your giddiness is correct, if it does not benefit you, will not cure you of your giddiness, I have no obligation to explain.
It is impossible for a mind that is not exposed to force to experience giddiness. In the past I used to suffer from giddiness especially when I wake up but now through meditation and truly achieving not forcefully stretching, changing speed and loudness, I have not experienced dizziness for a long time. Thus if you must continue to expose your mind to force by unnecessarily using force to prolong, change speed and loudness, to like and dislike, to be emotional, no amount of explaining, exercise and medication will relieve you of your giddiness which is a sign that your mind is being degraded by force and you are headed for future suffering. As people grow older, their giddy spells become more frequent, more severe and lasts longer.
The customer is not always right:
Anyone who advocates this false generalization or mental rule or precept that the customer is always right has wrong view that is the path to hell or the animal womb. Faith in precepts or rules is a fetter to future woe.
It is never genuine but to please the customer for the sake of money that the customer is always right and the person does not believe that but he fakes he does just to go along not realizing he will go mad because he will finally truly believe the customer is always right.
Even if you know the customer can be and is often wrong does not mean you must antagonize him but you don’t fake to him that he is right nor do you upbraid him.
The purpose of arguing is never to reason but fight:
Much as people addicted to arguing would like to deceive themselves and others that their purpose in arguing is to reason with you over an issue, the issue at hand is just a convenient excuse with which to engage with you in verbal combat with the goal or reward being defeating you or making you suffer whilst faking they won because they remained unfazed and was even enjoying themselves whilst they worked you up into a huff.
Whatever arguments or reasoning that is presented by a person as the basis of their engaging you in an argument are just excuses, if examined can be found to be faulty or false and the purpose of arguing is to dominate or intimidate, to attack and defeat the other person with whatever means available and in as many ways available. Thus if you actually started the fight but if you can heap the blame for starting on him by making him attack you angrily, that too will be a criteria for success.
One may argue that arguing is stressful so why would she want to engage me in an argument for little or no reasons but that may be apparent than real.
I think a reason she tried to involve me in an argument is because she can perceive I was trying to terminate the contact because I seem in a hurry and did not seem to enjoy her company very much, so she asked me what she should know is a very tough question for anyone to answer, “why are so rude” so that hopefully I will get into an argument with her and therefore she will make me suffer not just by getting angry for which she can further attack me for attacking her by showing my anger but she would have detained me, preventing me from proceeding with my plans.
If you just scold a person for being rude your attack only lasts whilst you are scolding him but if you can get him to quarrel with you, provided you are confident you will prevail, a quarrel will enable you to prolong your attack and infliction of suffering and perhaps new avenues for attack may crop up in the midst of the quarrel. Thus if you like to attack and hurt others, you will prefer to suck him into verbal combat with you rather than scold him. Perversely some proud goats may feel they would be seen as cowards if they just scold you and run away but they must beat you ‘fair and square’ in a fight when they are careful to pick their ‘fair and square’ fights. They would not dare challenge Mike Tyson to a quarrel.
THUS THE PURPOSE OF ARGUING OR VERBAL FIGHTING IS NOT TO REASON WITH YOU OVER THE ISSUE AT HAND BUT THE ISSUE AT HAND IS JUST AN EXCUSE TO GET INTO A FIGHT AND THE TRUE PURPOSE OF ARGUING IS TO FIGHT AND WIN IN WHATEVER WAYS POSSIBLE BY MAKING YOU SUFFER, HIDE THEIR INEVITABLE SUFFERING AND INSTEAD EVEN PRESENT THE FALSE IMPRESSION THAT THEY ENJOYED IT VERY MUCH, THEY ARE GOOD AND YOU ARE BAD.
THUS BECAUSE THE PURPOSE OF ARGUING IS TO FIGHT AND THE PURPOSE OF FIGHTING IS TO WIN, THERE ARE CRITERIAS WITH WHICH TO MEASURE THEIR WINNING.
ONE SIGN OF VICTORY IS THAT THEY HAVE DISGUISED THEIR PROVOCATIONS OF YOU AND INSTEAD BLAME YOU FOR STARTING THE FIGHT. FOR INSTANCE IN THIS CASE IF I WERE TO GET ANGRY AND TALK LOUDLY SHE CAN ACCUSE ME OF ATTACKING HER FOR NO REASON WHEN SHE JUST CALMLY ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION. SHE HAS MADE ME SEEM TO BE THE AGGRESSOR, THE ONE WHO IS RUDE, NOT HER. THE IDEA IS TO START THE FIRE AND MAKE THE OTHER PERSON GET BLAMED FOR STARTING THE FIRE.
IF YOU PERCEIVE THE OTHER PERSON DON'T LIKE YOUR COMPANY AND WANT TO GET RID OF YOU THEN TO DELAY HIM, TO MAKE HIM ENGAGE YOU IN A HEATED ARGUMENT IS ITSELF A GOAL BECAUSE YOU HAVE DEFINITELY MADE HIM SUFFER BY DETAINING HIM.
ANOTHER PURPOSE OF ARGUING IS TO DECEIVE THE OTHER PERSON IS DECEIVE HIM THAT YOU ARE ENJOYING YOURSELF, YOU ARE GOOD WHILST YOU MAKE HIM SUFFER, YOU KNOW HE IS NOT ENJOYING IT AND MAKE HIM BELIEVE HE IS BAD OR APPEAR TO BE BAD TO THOSE WHO MAY BE OBSERVING.
IT IS ACTUALLY MORE STRESSFUL AND CONFLICT GENERATING TO NOT JUST ATTACK A PERSON BUT FAKE YOU ARE NOT ATTACKING BY DISGUISING IT WITH A GENTLE WAY OF SPEAKING AND THEN HIDE YOU STRESS BY EXPRESSING YOU ARE ENJOYING YOURSELF WHEN YOU ARE EVEN MORE STRESSED THAN THE OTHER PERSON BECAUSE NOT ONLY MUST YOU ATTACK, YOU MUST FAKE YOU ARE NOT ATTACKING AND EVEN HAPPY WHEN YOU ARE NOT.
I THINK SHE CAN SENSE THAT I WANTED TO TERMINATE THE TRANSACTION AND ONE PURPOSE IN ASKING ME THE DIFFICULT QUESTION APART FROM ATTACKING ME IS TO DEVIOUSLY DETAIN ME.
SURELY SHE KNOWS THE QUESTION SHE POSED IS A DIFFICULT QUESTION FOR ME TO ANSWER AND IT IS LIKE HANDLING ME A HOT POTATO TO SWALLOW AND THAT TOO IS INTENDING TO MAKE ME SUFFER.
THE FACT THAT SHE CAN ASK THE QUESTION QUITE CALMLY IS NOT AN INDICATION THAT IT IS NOT A LOADED BUT A GENUINE QUESTION BUT IT INDICATES SHE IS AN EXPERT AT PROVOKING OTHERS SOFTLY OR AT DISGUISING HER GOOD ATTACKING SHOTS. AN AMATEUR OR FIRST TIMER AT ATTACKING OTHERS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CONCEAL THE AGGRESSION THAT MUST ACCOMPANY SUCH A QUESTION, 'WHY ARE YOU SO RUDE?'. SURELY SHE MUST DISLIKE MY RUDENESS QUITE STRONGLY TO RAISE THE ISSUE AND THEREFORE THE GENTLENESS OR NONCHALANCE WITH WHICH SHE ASKS BELIES OR CONTRADICTS THE QUITE STRONG DISLIKE THAT MUST MOTIVATE IT AND SHE MUST THUS BE SKILFUL AT CONCEALING HER VENOM.
THUS BY CONCEALING EVIDENCE OF HER ATTACKING, SHE HANDED ME A BOMB WITH WHICH TO BLOW MYSELF UP SO THAT SHE CAN TURN AROUND AND FURTHER ATTACK ME FOR GETTING ANGRY AT HER WHEN SHE IS BEHAVING IN SUCH A CIVILIZED POLITE MANNER.
IT IS FLIRTING WITH FUTURE MADNESS TO PERCEIVE YOUR ARGUING IS BASED ON NECESSITY AND REASON WHEN THE ISSUE IS MERELY A CONVENIENT EXCUSE TO GET INTO A VERBAL FIGHT IN WHICH YOUR AIM IS TO WIN AND MAKE THE OTHER PERSON SUFFER AND BE PERCEIVED AS BAD. IT REFLECTS ADVANCED FALSE PERCEPTION THAT MOST PEOPLE BELIEVE (ACCEPT AS TRUE) THAT THEIR ARGUING IS BASED ON REASON NOT EMOTION, IS GOOD FOR THEM WHEN IT IS BAD FOR THEM AND THE PERSON THEY ARGUE WITH.

THUS WHEN A PERSON SOFTLY TELLS ME, “I DISAGREE WITH YOU, I SMILE BECAUSE I LIKE SOMEONE', THE SOFT MANNER NEVER DENOTES FRIENDLINESS OR GOODWILL BUT IT ALWAYS DENOTES CONCEALED ILL WILL THAT IS NOT WITHOUT HARM BECAUSE IT WRONGLY GIVES ME THE IMPRESSION YOU ARE FRIENDLY BUT I AM AT FAULT FOR YOUR NOT AGREEING WITH ME, IT DENOTES A PERSON WELL VERSED IN THE ART OF KILLING OTHERS SOFTLY, OF DISGUISING HIS ATTACKING SHOTS. IT IS NOT THAT YOU MUST TELL ME AGGRESSIVELY THAT YOU DISAGREE WITH ME BUT YOU SHOULD SAY IT PLAINLY WITHOUT A FALSE GENTLE STYLE THAT IS INTENDED TO TELL ME YOU ARE NOT TO BLAME FOR DISAGREEING WITH ME BUT I AM TO BLAME BECAUSE I AM WRONG WHEN THE TRUTH CAN BE OBJECTIVELY SHOWN IT IS YOU WHO IS WRONG NOT ME. YOUR LIKING IS NOT BASED ON REASON OR LOVE BUT THE STIRRING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH OF YOUR MENTAL FORCE TO BECOME ATTRACTED ON SEEING SOMEONE BECAUSE OF HIS OR HER PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES AND YOUR SMILING THAT ARISES AS A RESULT OF THAT LIKING IS NOTHING MORE THAN THE EXERCISING OF THE MUSCLES OF YOUR FACE USING FORCE THAT REQUIRES NO REASON PRESENT AND SERVES NO USEFUL FUNCTION EXCEPT TO EXPRESS LIKING OR IMPRESS THE OTHER PERSON WITH YOUR LIKING SO THAT HOPEFULLY SHE WILL ALSO LIKE YOU THAT IS TO YOUR MATERIAL ADVANTAGE, IS BASED ON FORCE NOT REASON AND YOU ARE UNWITTINGLY ADMITTING YOU ARE MAN OF FORCE, DRIVEN BY FORCE NOT GUIDED BY REASON.
YOU CANNOT DISAGREE WITH GOD BECAUSE GOD IS ALWAYS RIGHT BECAUSE HE KNOWS AND SEES EVERYTHING HENCE IF MY VIEW CORRESPONDS TO GOD'S VIEW MUCH CLOSER THAN YOURS, BY TELLING ME YOU DISAGREE WITH ME YOU ARE ALSO DISAGREEING WITH GOD. IF YOU DISAGREE WITH GOD HOW CAN YOU BE ONE WITH GOD AND SO YOU MUST GO YOUR LONELY WAY EVEN FOR ANOTHER ETERNITY.
THERE ARE MANY IN THIS WORLD WHO WILL APPLAUD YOU AND SAY YOU ARE CORRECT THAT SMILING AND LIKING ARE LOVELY AND SO YOU WILL JOIN THEM WHETHER THAT IS HEAVEN OR HELL IS FOR YOU TO FIND OUT LATER IF YOU CANNOT DISCERN OR SEE CLEARLY AS IT IS, NOW. EVEN SADDAM HUSSEIN OR HITLER OR STALIN IS LIKELY IF NOT CERTAINLY TO LAUGH AND AGREE WITH YOU HEARTILY IF YOU TELL THEM YOU SMILE BECAUSE YOU LIKE SOMEONE AND SO YOU KNOW WHAT KIND OF COMPANY YOU ARE IN. HOW DO YOU KNOW JESUS OR GOD AGREES WITH YOU (AND SADDAM & HITLER) WHEN YOU HAVE NOT INTERVIEWED THEM? THE MAN WHO SMILES AND LIKES IS THE MAN WHO WILL NOT DENY HIMSELF WHILST THE MAN WHO DOES NOT LIKE AND DOES NOT SMILE IS THE MAN WHO DENIES HIMSELF THE WAYS OF THIS WORLD AND JESUS SAID YOU MUST DENY YOURSELF, CARRY YOUR CROSS OF PERSECUTION (THE WORLD WILL HATE THOSE WHO DO NOT SMILE AND LIKE LIKE THEM) AND GO WITH HIM.

If you just scold a person you are attacking him and that is sin.
If you ask him why he is so rude, a loaded question, you are provoking him to verbally retaliate and that is inciting others to sin that is even greater sin.
If in addition you disguise your shot by making it appear that your question is good natured when it is an attack so that you can deny you are attacking and blame if for any subsequent outburst that is yet further compounding your sin to start a quarrel and make it appear it is the other person who started it.
Stressful postures:
If you keep your head tilted to one side or twist it around the neck, if you bend your body forward, backward or sideways, if you twist your forearm or leg around its axis or bend their joints (eg flex or extend your wrists) or clench your muscles when it is unnecessary either because it is deemed stylish or because innate tension forces you to do so, you are maintaining yourself in tension, conditioning yourself further to do so.
The most easeful postures are the muscles are not clenched if there is no necessity, if the posture of the body is most gravity neutral, there is no forceful rotation of the body part around its axis, no bending of the joint and if you do not do so, whether you are aware or not that you do not do so or you do not do so because your tension does not permit or you want to be stylish, you are creating unnecessary stress, restlessness and distraction for yourself and maintaining yourself in the prison of substance and style accompanied by stress, restlessness and distraction that will end in loss of control and madness.