Politeness Is Hypocrisy

Politeness is hypocrisy:
Because politeness is essentially faking that you liked what others did or said to you that you did not like, it is practicing falsity and essentially hypocrisy.
Did Jesus say the destination of hypocrites is heaven or perdition?
It reflects advanced false perception that ordinary people worship politeness and think it is good when it is disguised shit.
Thus those who desire others to be polite want others to be hypocrites and is asking for judgment that is far graver than they ever imagined possible.
By asking me why are you so rude, you imply that I should be polite or a hypocrite and if that is advocating sin and suffering to me, you may rue in eternal regret for your wickedness.
It is not that you should express your dislike or be nasty to the other person as a result of what he said or did but you should never fake you liked it.
A person who does not stir his mental force to like or dislike whatever happens or is done to him so what is there for him to fake he liked when he disliked? Only a person who likes and dislikes is forced to not express his dislike to what has happened or fake he liked what he disliked has happened.
Whatever that is false or harmful matters nothing:
Whatever that is said or done that is false does not matter but what matters is the force that always accompanies to force the perpetrator himself to believe as forcefully as possible it is true and to force you to accept with force not true reason what is false is true.
Hence when something said or done is false (eg a lie), it does not matter what was said or done but what matters is the force that accompanies that forces the perpetrator to believe and act as realistic as possible what he said or did falsely is true and the force or ill will that he transmits with what he said or did falsely to force you to accept it as true.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID (A LIE OR SARCASM) OR DONE FALSELY (WEEPING AS IF SORRY FOR YOU WHEN HE FELT NOTHING) MEANS NOTHING BECAUSE IT IS FALSE OR DID NOT HAPPEN. WHATEVER DID NOT HAPPEN IS MEANINGLESS.
WHAT MATTERS IS THE ILL WILL OR FORCEFULNESS TO ACT AS IF WHAT HE SAID (LIE) OR DID (WEEP) IS TRUE OR GENUINE AND FORCE IN WHAT HE LIED OR WEPT TO FORCE YOU TO ACCEPT IT AS TRUE.
THUS WHATEVER SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE IS ALL ABOUT THE USE OF FORCE OR A VEHICLE FOR ILL WILL.
Whatever that is said or done hurtfully does not matter because what matters is that what is said (eg why are you so rude) or done (slap in the face) is just a convenient vehicle to convey force that attacks the victim.
THUS THERE ARE THREE FACETS OF ILL WILL, NAMELY THE USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE OR THE FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT CREATE STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION IN OTHERS, THE USE OF FORCE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO OTHERS WHERE WHAT IS SAID OR DONE FALSELY OR HARMFULLY IS JUST AN EXCUSE TO CONVEY FORCE TO DECEIVE OR HARM OTHERS.
SAYING OR DOING WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SUBSTANCE OR MEANING BUT EVERYTHING TO DO WITH FORCE OR ILL WILL.

ILL WILL & SENSUALITY:
IT IS NEVER TRUE REASON BUT FORCE THAT IS ILL (ALSO KNOWN AS ‘ILL WILL’) THAT PROPELS YOU TO FIRST MANUFACTURE AND THEN TO DESIRE OVER NATURAL RESISTANCE THAT MUST BE THERE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL IN THE NAME OF DECEIVING (PUTTING ON A SHOW TO IMPRESS, PLEASE) OR HARMING OTHERS AND IT IS AGAIN FORCE THAT IS ILL OR IT IS ILL WILL THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO POWER WHAT YOU WANT TO SAY OR DO THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID (EG A LIE OR SARCASM) OR DONE (EG FAKED WEEPING) FALSELY OR HARMFULLY (EG SLAP) DOES NOT MATTER BUT WHAT MATTERS IS THAT IT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AND THE MENTAL FORCE THAT IS REQUIRED TO CAUSE SOMEONE TO SAY OR DO WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL PLUS THE EXCESSIVE FORCE THAT IS ALWAYS REQUIRED TO POWER THE SAYING OR DOING OF WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
THUS IF YOU SAY OR DO SOMETHING THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL, IT IS ILL WILL OR FORCE THAT IS ILL THAT CAUSES YOU TO FABRICATE AND DESIRE TO EXECUTE IT AND FORCE THAT IS ILL OR ILL WILL THAT POWERS WHAT YOU SAID OR DID THAT WAS FALSE OR HARMFUL.
A PERSON’S ILL WILL CONSISTS OF HIS DESIRE AND USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE IN WHATEVER HE PERCEIVES, THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES THAT DEMANDS THE USE OF FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY TO PROLONG SYLLABLES, CHANGE SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT STRESSES, MAKE RESTLESS AND DISTRACT OTHERS. IN ADDITION TO HIS STYLE HIS ILL WILL CAUSES HIM TO FABRICATE, DESIRE TO EXECUTE AND POWER WHATEVER HE SAYS OR DOES THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO OTHERS.
SENSUALITY IS MERELY THE COUNTERPART OF ILL WILL IN ONE’S SEEING, HEARING, SMELLING, TASTING AND TOUCHING WHEREIN ONE USES FORCE THAT IS UNNECESSARY IN FABRICATING THE STYLE WITH WHICH ONE SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES AND TOUCHES AND ONE’S MENTAL FORCE STIRS TO LIKE OR DISLIKE WHAT ONE SEES, HEARS, SMELLS, TASTES AND TOUCHES.
(SENSUALITY AND ILL WILL ARE TWO OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS TO EXISTENCE IN THE LOWER REALMS)
Boosting your force of self preservation:
Whenever force either externally or internally generated impacting on his consciousness exceed significantly the strength of the force of self preservation, the being experiences pain or hurt.
Thus in order to avoid or minimize painful hurt experiences, a being must strive to be on guard, to be alert and keep his force of self preservation heightened and ‘on the ball’ so that it will snuff out or shield all forceful assaults, internal or external on their consciousness.
However, it is stressful and tiring to keep your force of self preservation constantly artificially heightened in anticipation and even then occasional assaults will get through as when someone spits violently in your presence or someone roars off violently in his motorbike.
You can artificially boost the idling speed of an engine to prevent it stalling but it involves greater wear and tear and unnecessary energy consumption.
An artificially boosted force of self preservation consumes energy and cannot be sustained indefinitely so that every now and then it flags exposing the person to hurt and pain from others or self.
By contrast, a person who does not act, who has no style, who does not force himself to go against himself to say or do things that pleases or impresses others has puny forces of going against self that cannot be stirred much by others or self and he is automatically immune to hurt or pain caused by the bombardment of force from others.
FOR PEOPLE WHO WISH TO GET ALONG WITH OTHERS AND SUCCEED IN LIFE, THEY WILL HAVE TO CONSTANTLY BOOST THE STRENGTH AND RESPONSIVENESS OF THEIR FORCES OF SELF PRESERVATION IN ORDER TO WARD OFF FORCE BLOWS FROM OTHERS AND SELF. APART FROM NECESSITATING GREATER ENERGY EXPENDITURE AND STRESS, THIS ARTIFICIALLY BOOSTED LEVEL OF THE FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION CANNOT BE MAINTAINED AND MUST SOMETIMES FLAG OFTEN AT INOPPORTUNE MOMENTS LEAVING THE PERSON VULNERABLE TO HURT. EVEN IF IT IS HEIGHTENED THERE WILL STILL OCCUR EVENTS WHERE THE FORCE RECEIVED OVERWHELMS THE FORCE OF SELF PERSERVATION TO CAUSE HURT.
A PERSON WHO DOES ACT, HAS NO STYLE, DOES NOT GO AGAINST HIMSELF TO PLEASE OR IMPRESS OTHERS HAS A PUNY FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF THAT CANNOT BE STIRRED TO VIOLENT STRENGTH BY OTHERS AND HE IS EFFORTLESSLY IMMUNE TO HURT BY OTHERS.
A lost cause:
No matter how you strive to shield yourself from hurt generated by others or yourself by keeping your force of self preservation heightened and alert, it takes energy and stress to do so and even then many events will still penetrate the heightened barricade to cause hurt. Goats know this and they strive to hurt others by making sudden unexpected violently accelerating noises and motions that attempt to catch bystanders’ forces of self preservation off guard thereby hurting them. Furthermore such heightened and alert force of self preservation cannot be indefinitely sustained and there will be occasions that you dread when your guard will be dropped and you become vulnerable, open to hurt by the considerable force strength and force changes in audio visual input from others.
There is a way out of this predicament or no win situation. Because whatever force transmitted by others or self impacts on one’s consciousness through the intermediary of that being’s force of going against self, if his force of going against self is absent or very weak, it cannot be stirred to violent strength and violent changes by whatever happens and therefore there is little or no hurt.
IF YOU DID NOT POSSESS A FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF, IT CANNOT BE SEIZED BY WICKED OTHERS TO HURT YOU. THE STRONGER YOUR FORCE OF GOING AGAINST SELF IS, THE MORE PAINFUL THE HURT YOU MUST EXPERIENCE WHEN IT IS STIRRED TO LEVELS THAT FAR EXCEED YOUR FORCE OF SELF PRESERVATION.
Self identity is possessiveness:
The essence if not entirety of self identity views that the Buddha said is one of three lower fetters to future woe is possessiveness.
As the Buddha said, he has cut off all “I” making, all is not self.
By contrast foolish ordinary people (who do not realize they are headed for perdition) are making all sorts of claims:
My money, my house, my car, my stocks, my wife, my children, my career, my rank, my diplomas, my views or opinions, my thoughts, my ideas, my style or charm, my beautiful body and pretty face.
Possessiveness is irrational and it is never based on reason or understanding why but it is always based on force, on liking or attraction or emotional attachment.
A PERSON’S ATTACHMENT TO HIS STYLE IN WHAT AND HOW HE SAYS OR DOES THINGS, HIS STYLE IN WHAT AND HOW HE THINKS AND PERCEIVES IS A CRUCIAL IF NOT PARAMOUNT COMPONENT OF HIS SELF IDENTITY VIEWS. IF YOU DID NOT LIKE YOUR STYLE OR ARE ATTACHED TO IT, THINK IT REFLECTS YOU, YOU WOULD NOT STICK TO THIS SAME STYLE YOUR WHOLE LIFE LONG.
Only motive never meaning:
If something said or done is false (eg a lie) or harmful (eg slap) it cannot have any intrinsic MEANING (that can be understood) but it can only have MOTIVATION (only force can motivate, reason can only guide) that can only be to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others. This motivation behind what is false and harmful is ill will. Because ordinary people perceive emotions, like and dislike as meaningful they may perceive falsely that whatever said or done that is false or harmful is meaningful.
Everything that can be said or done, and that includes how it is said or done (also known as style) can be examined and determined as true (happened or can happen) or false (did not happen or cannot happen) and if it is determined to be false then the person cannot mean what he said or did falsely and because he is not mad (at least not yet), he must mean to deceive you or impress, please, intimidate or dominate you with what and how he said or did.
Whatever that is said or done whether true or false, must be powered by force.
The force that powers what is said or done falsely is usually excessive with unnecessary prolonging of syllables or units of motion, changes in speed and strength of force, and is called the person’s ill will or force for ill.
The force that powers what is said and done that is true is powered by force that is never excessive, without prolonging, changing of speed and strength and is called the person’s good will or force for good.
Unless the person is mad, he must have motivation for saying or doing something.
The motivation for saying or doing something false is never true reason (which will tell the person what he said or did was false) but it must be emotional, specifically to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate the other person.
When the recipient is deceived, he believes or accepts with force not true reason (which would have told him it is false) what is said or done falsely is true and this is stirring his mental force to forcefully accept what is false is true. Whatever stirs another person’s mental force to be deceived cannot be meaningful but a meaningless stirring of force.
When the recipient is impressed his mental force is stirred to be attracted to you, when he is pleased, his mental force is stirred to like himself as a result of what you said or did, when he is intimidated or dominated his mental force is stirred to fear or submit to you.
Thus the aim of saying or doing what is false to stir the mental forces of others to be deceived, impressed, pleased, intimidated or dominated is a meaningless nonspecific stirring of mental forces, not specific to the occasion discrete meaning.
This false motivation (to deceive, impress, please, intimidate and dominate) behind what is said or done falsely is the ONLY basis for saying or doing what is said or done because what is said or done has false meaning. Thus all intentions in saying or doing something that is to impress, please, intimidate or dominate are false and the fact that you think this is not false but nevertheless meaningful reflects advanced false perception and logic on your path.
Thus the motivation behind what is said or done falsely is also harmful and false and therefore ill and it is again ill will that motivates people to say or do what is false.
THERE CANNOT BE ANY MEANING IN WHAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE BECAUSE WHAT IS FALSE IS MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE IT IS THE MOTIVATION FOR SAYING OR DOING IT, NAMELY TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE THAT GIVES IT LEGITIMACY OR MEANING AND THIS TOO IS FALSE BECAUSE IT IS MERELY A STIRRING OF FORCE OR EMOTION IN THE RECIPIENT, NEVER ADDRESSED AT HIS REASON OR LOGIC OR UNDERSTANDING.
THE FORCE THAT POWERS THE SAYING OR DOING OF WHAT IS FALSE IS ALWAYS EXCESSIVE WITH CONSTANT UNNECESSARY PROLONGING, CHANGING IN SPEED AND STRENGTH AND THE MOTIVATION THAT IS TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE IS MERELY A STIRRING OF MENTAL FORCE IS ALSO FALSE AND THEY BOTH CONSTITUTE THE PERSON’S ILL WILL OR FORCE FOR ILL OR EVIL THAT THE BUDDHA SAID IS A FETTER TO THE LOWER REALMS.
Whatever that is said or done that is true is meaningful and understandable by itself and there is no need for it to be accompanied by false, harmful force changes like forcefully prolonging syllables, changing speed or loudness and because it is meaningful by itself, there is no need for false motives like to impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS TRUE IS FULLY UNDERSTANDABLE BY ITSELF AND HAS SPECIFIC MEANING THAT CANNOT BE CONFUSED WITH OTHER SITUATIONS, MUST BE FREE FROM ALL FALSE FORCE ENCUMBERANCES LIKE FORECFUL STRETCHING, CHANGING OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS (NAMELY STYLE) AND IS NOT MOTIVATED TO IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE.
THE FORCE THAT POWERS WHAT IS SAID OR DONE IN TRUTH IS ESSENTIAL NEVER EXCESSIVE PLUS THE MOTIVE TO SAY OR DO IT TO CONVEY WHAT IS TRUE OR MEANINGFUL TO THE RECIPIENT IS THE GOODWILL OR WILL FOR GOOD THAT UNDERLIES IT.
If a person has examined and knows what he is saying or doing is false and yet he says or does it, then his motivation for saying or doing it must be to deceive you (to falsely make you believe what is false is true) or he likes the style of what he said (eg ‘deafening silence’ or ‘a saree is anything but a piece of cloth’ sound cute and profound) or he wants to impress, please, intimidate or dominate you with what he says or does. This is a person who is deliberately ill willed.
If a person has not examined what he said or did, does not know what he said or did is false then he must have copied it blindly from others because he emotionally liked it (eg deafening silence or a new dance). This is a person (or fool) who does not know what he is saying or doing although he may think he does.
If a person has examined what he said or did and nevertheless believe or have faith what he said or did is true and good then he is deluded, he has false perception and logic of what is false is true and good. For instance you have examined your gorgeous smile and attractive liking for others and determined that they are genuine and beneficial for yourself and others when in truth they are both stressful and lead to getting hurt, then you are deluded and nothing can be done for you except for you to play out your delusions for however many eons or Ages it may take before you develop discernment or seeing things clearly as they are.
Any dance be it classical or contemporary, western or ethnic is totally meaningless and the fact that you perceive they have meaning reflects your advanced false perception. When you sweep the floor, you want to get it clean and that is meaningful. When you prepare your food and cook it, that is meaningful because you get a meal afterwards. Whatever meaning in a dance is emotional or for show, it is to see the repetitive sequences of prolonging, direction, force and speed changes of the body and limbs of the dancer that stirs your mental force to be attracted or repulsed. People undertake a dance career because of money, fame and impress others with their ability to move their bodies in a way that is attractive to many (not all) paying people. People learn the cha, cha, cha to impress others of their social graces or use it to get near girls. Because all dances are meaningless, are for show, only have emotional meaning and they are etched in the person’s mind, he is headed for madness, mad meaningless writhing movements in an acute crisis or old age.
Whatever else a saree can be it is still a piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be like be a car and so the statement that a saree is anything but a piece of cloth is false just as silence cannot deafen but only a very loud sound can decouple the ear ossicles to cause temporary deafness and the basis for saying them is because they sound contradictory and outrageous and you liked it and want to impress others with what you say.
THUS WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT CAN BE PROVEN TO BE FALSE HAS NO INTRINSIC MEANING BUT WHAT GIVES IT MEANING IS THE MOTIVATION TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE AND IN ADDITION THE EXCESSIVE FORCE USED TO COMMISSION IT VIA FORCEFUL PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH THAT IS INTENDED TO SIMILARLY STIR THE RECIPIENT AND INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY HARM HIM AND THIS IS THE ESSENCE OF ILL WILL THAT LEADS TO THE LOWER REALM.
Why don’t you slap a tree or a stone? There is nothing intrinsically good or bad or meaningful in slapping something but the reason why someone slaps another is to hurt or harm him and that is ill will. Thus whenever someone says or does something that hurts or harms the other person it is motivated out of ill will and there is no meaning in what is said or done.
You can also attack others with what and how you say something that is aimed to hurt or make him angry eg ‘nobody can be more foolish than you, you idiot!’. You can attack or obstruct others with what you do eg accelerating your car to stop someone crossing the road or drive slowly in the middle of the road to stop someone behind passing you.
WHATEVER YOU SAY OR DO THAT HURTS, HARMS OR OBSTRUCTS OR PESTERS SOMEONE NEVER MATTERS BUT THEY ARE MERELY EXPEDIENT VEHICLES TO HARM OTHERS DRIVEN BY ILL WILL THAT LEADS TO THE LOWER REALMS. INSTEAD OFTEN PEOPLE WHO INTEND TO ATTACK AND HURT OTHERS WILL DENY THEIR INTENTION AND INSIST THAT YOU HAVE MISCONSTRUED THEIR INTENTIONS, EG THEY DID NOT ACCELERATE TO STOP YOU CROSSING BUT THEY ARE IN A HURRY.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYTHING SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO HAVE ANY INTRINSIC MEANING AND THEY ONLY HAVE MOTIVE TO DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE OR DOMINATE APART FROM THE EXCESSIVE FORCE THAT ALWAYS ACCOMPANIES IT. IN SHORT ILL WILL IS THE MOTIVATION AND POWER OF WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AND THERE CAN BE NO DISCRETE MEANING IN WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL. IF YOU PERCEIVE SOMETHING SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL AS MEANINGFUL, YOU HAVE SERIOUS FALSE PERCEPTION THAT WILL END IN MAD PERCEPTION.
Motive that is false or harmful is ill will:
Whatever that is false or harmful cannot have meaning that can be understood and so they can only have motive to harm, deceive, impress, please, dominate or intimidate. Motive is about force and only force can motivate whilst (true) reason can only guide or illuminate and this motivation behind the saying or doing what is false or harmful is the person’s ILL WILL.
THE BUDDHA SAID ILL WILL IS ONE OF FIVE LOWER FETTERS THAT DETAIN A PERSON IN THE LOWER REALMS.
A PERSON’S ILL WILL COMPRISES HIS UNNECESSARY CONSTANT USE OF FORCE TO PROLONG, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE IN WHATEVER HE THINKS, SAYS OR DOES AND HIS DOING OR SAYING WHATEVER THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL BECAUSE WHATEVER THAT IS SAID OR DONE THAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL HAS NO MEANING ONLY MOTIVATION THAT IS ILL TO HARM, DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE AND DOMINATE. APART FROM THE ABOVE YOU CANNOT BE EVIL.
What meaning is there in a slap?
What meaning is there in a slap?
If you agree there is no meaning, then it can only have motive that is to physically and emotionally hurt the other person.
What meaning that can be understood is there in something false like ‘deafening silence’ when silence cannot deafen or ‘a saree is anything but a piece of cloth’ when a saree is a piece of cloth and there are many things a saree cannot be?
If you agree they do not have meaning then there must be motive to say them which is wicked eg to be mischievous, to deceive you that it is something profound when it is nonsense or to impress you.
What meaning is there in a dance?
If you agree that the dance achieves no useful work then it is meaningless for show to impress you or stir your liking and whatever sustenance the dancer derives is emotional (want others to be impressed with her) or material (wealth, fame).
ILL WILL IS ALL ABOUT FORCE AND THE USE OF FORCE.
ILL WILL CAN ONLY BE:
A) THE CONSTANT UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE TO FABRICATE A STYLE IN WHATEVER ONE THINKS, SPEAKS AND DOES THAT IS ESSENTIALLY FORCEFUL STRETCHING OF SYLLABLES, CHANGES OF SPEED AND LOUDNESS THAT IMPACTS ON OTHERS CAUSING THEM STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
B) THE SAYING OR DOING OF THINGS THAT ARE FALSE OR HARMFUL THAT NEVER HAVE UNDERSTANDABLE MEANING BUT ALWAYS HAVE MOTIVE TO HURT, DECEIVE, IMPRESS, PLEASE, INTIMIDATE & DOMINATE.

Dollar plunges to fresh euro low:
It reflects the predilection of the person for force that he uses the word that actively denotes the use of force 'plunge' instead of the more passive 'fall' as in 'dollar falls to fresh euro low'.
It is false perception that the dollar can plunge. The dollar can drop or fall or decline but it cannot plunge which denote a violent active process as when a diver plunges into the sea.
By using 'plunge' you stir the reader's mental force that causes him stress and restlessness and you foster his false perception that the dollar can plunge when it can only drop or decline in value.
Quote: Expectation that the US will lower borrowing costs - while intended to boost the economy - can also make the currency less attractive.
It again reflect a penchant for strong words to use 'boost' when stimulate the economy may be more appropriate. Lowering interest rates may not will stimulate the economy but boosting is a bit farfetched.
EVERY TIME A PERSON USES FORCEFUL WORDS IN PREFERENCE TO MORE FORCE NEUTRAL WORDS, HE IS FOSTERING HIS INCLINATION TO USE FORCE THAT IS REINFORCING SO THAT HE INCREASINGLY BECOMES A SLAVE TO HIS MENTAL FORCE THAT GROWS INCREASINGLY MONSTRUOUS IN SIZE UNTIL IT SEIZES HIM LIKE A DEMON. THEREFORE CONTINUE TO BE CARELESS IN YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS AND IF THERE IS WEEPING AND GNASHING OF TEETH AHEAD THEN YOU DESERVE IT.
Motive that harms or falsifies is ill will:
What a person says may be true, false, make no sense (nonsense eg yabadabadoo, uh oh), contradictory or sarcastic (opposite what he meant).
If what you say or do is false, makes no sense, contradictory or sarcastic then whether you know it or not, you believe it is true when it is not, you cannot mean what you say or do but you only have motive for saying or doing it which can only be to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate.
Because motive is not about reason or meaning but force that drives what is said or done, this force or motive that drives what is said or done that is false, nonsense, contradictory or sarcastic is ill will.
BECAUSE THERE IS NO MEANING IN WHAT IS FALSE AND THERE IS ONLY MOTIVE FOR SAYING OR DOING IT, THIS MOTIVE THAT IS ALWAYS BASED ON FORCE IS THE PERSON’S ILL WILL, THAT ALSO DRIVES HIM TO SAY OR DO THINGS THAT HARM OTHERS (EG SLAP ANOTHER) AND FABRICATE A STYLE BY PROLONGING, CHANGING SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE THAT PERSECUTES OTHERS WITH STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION.
What is the Dalai Lama’s Motive?
If what the Dalai Lama says below is false then it has no meaning but only motive that is to deceive, impress or please.
Quote:
Compassion key for peace
Force can't subdue the desire for freedom, writes Dalai Lama.
Comment: Force can subdue the desire for freedom as amply demonstrated many times in the Iron Curtain countries and also in North Korea, Burma and Zimbabwee. Even those liberated countries are subject to continued tyranny, Putin can be seen as a present day Czar and many countries are only nominally democratic.
Therefore force can subdue the desire for freedom if not indefinitely then for a very long time. It cannot kill the desire for freedom but it certainly can suppress.
Even the desire for freedom itself is irrational and emotional and once delivered from tyranny those who were previously oppressed then become the oppressors.
Compassion is not the key for peace. There may be no keys to peace because peace is impossible on earth. As Jesus said, he did come to bring peace but with a sword. No peace is possible if you understand the nature of beings trapped here, even those who are the religious leaders are deluded.
Thus it is likely if not certain what the Dalai Lama said is false so since it is meaningless, what is his motive in saying so?
His motive may be because he is a religious leader and rightly or wrongly, he is championing his way and telling you his way is the way to salvation whatever that might mean.
EVERYONE IN THIS WORLD WANTS TO CHAMPION HIS WAY AS THE WAY TO SALVATION BUT ARE THEY EQUALLY DELUDED LEADING OTHERS TO DOOM?
I have not come to bring peace:
Jesus said he had not come to bring peace but with a sword.
You can accuse Jesus of giving up before giving it a try but it may be that it is physically impossible for true and everlasting peace to reign on earth because of the nature of the beings trapped here.
Again if you understood the true Buddha speaking you will realize that it is fatuous to seek peace on earth.
Thus why are so many lesser men harping of bring peace to earth and saying amongst many things like prosperity, science, etc, that compassion is the key to peace? Do they know something that Jesus or the Buddha did not know?
Jesus said: "Do not think that I have come to bring peace on earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man's foes will be those of his own household. He who loves father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; and he who loves son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; and he who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for my sake will find it.
Goodwill not compassion is the key to peace:
This is irrefutably true: It is the absence of ill will or the presence of goodwill in all the beings here and not compassion or anything else that is the indispensable key to peace. Without the presence of goodwill in all the people present, there can be no genuine or lasting peace.
Because peace is the inevitable product of the absence of strife and only ill will present in the beings can cause strife (it is impossible to have strife without ill will which although never seen here is possible), it is goodwill and nothing else that is the requisite for peace.
Goodwill is the absence of unnecessary force transmitted in the speech and deeds of a being that is only for show (meaning no style, no forceful prolonging, changing speed and strength of force), no saying or doing things that are false (eg lies, joking or dancing) or harmful (slapping, obstructing or antagonizing others). If all beings here possess genuine goodwill as defined above, it is the nature of things that peace will be the state of existence here but because true goodwill cannot be found here, even amongst those who tout themselves as good and wise, peace is impossible on earth.
Because ill will (opposite of goodwill) is one of five lower fetters binding beings here according to the Buddha, all beings here are imbued with ill will (so disguised they call it their goodwill) and it is impossible for peace to exist on earth. Because beings here believe they are not deluded, they are perfectly capable of knowing and seeing the truth, perfectly capable of goodwill and compassion they believe peace is possible on earth.
The statement purportedly by the Dalai Lama that ‘compassion is the key to peace’ may appear reasonable but when examined, it is false and untenable in this world of ill will and because it is false and meaningless, it is motivated or has motive, addressed to the recipient’s emotion and because most people have well developed easily stirred emotion and poorly developed genuine reason, ‘compassion is the key to peace’ moves them and they find it meaningful just as they find their likes and dislikes and emotions meaningful when it is suffering and merely the alternative ways of stirring of their mental forces of going against self.
Peace can be in one’s mind (inner peace) or it can be in relationship with others when it is then an absence of strife or acrimony in the relationship between beings.
If peace is a matter of calm or absence of strife in one’s mind then it is not dependent on the existence of compassion in one’s mind but it is dependent on the presence of calmness and clarity of one’s mind and thoughts and that can only come about if one’s mind is free from force, like, dislike and emotions. A mind without calm clarity cannot be at peace with itself.
Because this is a world of ill will (it is according to the Buddha a fetter that binds all beings here and therefore all beings here possess ill will) and ill will is the requisite for strife and acrimony, without the cessation of ill will in all the beings here there cannot be peace. Even if you eliminate your ill will, others may not do so and so long as they have ill will there will be no peace on earth.
Ill will must not be confused with compassion. Compassion is less about thinking, let alone emotionally thinking but more about the willingness to assist and help others to alleviate their mental and physical hardships or guide the way out of their torment. Ill will is all about force, the urge to harm others in the forceful way one talks and does thing, say and do false or harmful things. It is ill will, the urge to harm others that lead to strife and the absence of peace, not the absence of compassion or assisting others that leads to strife or lack of peace. All the assisting and helping may fall on ungrateful ill willed minds who will nevertheless turn around and cut your head off, so what peace is your compassion the key to?
So long as all beings here possess ill will, are unwilling the relinquish their ill will, whatever peace that is achieved is under tension because they have to suppress or control their ill will to maintain the controlled peace that is subject to easy disruption for real or apparent provocation by one or the other party. Whatever peace that is achieved amongst people harbouring ill will is an illusion, inherently unstable, deceptive and vulnerable to disruption.
Because all ordinary people are emotional people, when they speak of compassion they are speaking more of an emotional state of their mind when they have this ‘tremendous’, ‘indescribable’ love and kindness for others, of benevolence for others that may not be backed up by or backed up scantly with genuine physical deeds that assist or benefit others.
Because the Buddha has no emotions, when he speaks of compassion there is no emotion involved but his compassion is a calm clearly thinking unencumbered knowing and seeing to help or assist others whom he perceived as trapped in suffering pointing the way to safety in heaven and even enlightenment to those amenable.
COMPASSION IS NOT SOMETHING YOU THINK A LOT EMOTIONALLY ABOUT (YOU ARE CONDITIONING YOURSELF AND WILL GO MAD IF YOU THINK A LOT ABOUT COMPASSION) OR TALK A LOT ABOUT, BUT COMPASSION IS ABOUT WHAT YOU DO OR SAY A LOT TO ASSIST OR HELP OTHERS. COMPASSION IS WHAT YOU SAY OR DO TO HELP OTHERS NOT WHAT YOU PIOUSLY THINK AND TALK ABOUT.
IT IS ILL WILL RESIDENT IN ALL BEINGS HERE THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE HERE THAT PREVENTS PEACE ESTABLISHING AND IT IS THE ELIMINATION OF ILL WILL, NOT THE CULTIVATION OF COMPASSION THAT IS THE KEY TO PEACE IN THIS WORLD AND BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR BEINGS IN THIS WORLD TO SHED THEIR ILL WILL, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE PEACE IN THIS WORLD.
FOR ONE WHO SEES CORRECTLY EVEN THOSE WHO CALL THEMSELVES GOOD OR BENEVOLENT AND WISE ARE DELUDED, ARE STRESSFULLY, RESTLESSLY AND DISTRACTINGLY NICE THAN TRULY GOOD, THEY TOO POSSESS SIGNIFICANTLY ILL WILL THAT ARE LIKE LONG FANGS THAT ARE CAREFULLY CONCEALED FROM THE PUBKIC GAZE AND SO IT IS HYPOCRITICAL FOR THEM TO TALK ABOUT COMPASSION AND BRINGING PEACE TO THIS WORLD.
BECAUSE WHAT THE DALAI LAMA SAID IS FALSE, IT MEANINGLESS AND THEREFORE HE CAN ONLY HAVE MOTIVE SAYING IT AND THE MOTIVE MAY BE TO APPEAL TO YOUR EMOTIONS SO THAT YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO HIM AND BECAUSE HE IS A RELIGIOUS LEADER, HE IS APPEALING TO HIS FLOCK AND THOSE WHO MIGHT BE ATTRACTED TO JOIN HIM.
Hypocritical talking about peace:
If there is style in your speech and actions that require the use of force to stretch, change speed and loudness that stress, make restless and distracted anyone who interacts with you, how can you possess genuine goodwill or harmlessness to all beings?
Because all beings here, including the Dalai Lama can be shown objectively to have a style (to forcefully stretch syllables, change speed and loudness), to say or do things to be nice not good to others, they are hypocrites to talk about goodwill and indeed compassion (what sort of compassion is that stressing, making restless and distracted others?)
In addition, it can be demonstrated objectively that those who preach compassion and goodwill speak & do falsely and harmfully to others apart from the harm of their styles.
Thus like the emperor with no clothes, they are hypocrites preaching goodwill or compassion.
What can compassion & ill will do?
If you are talking about peace between men, what can your compassion and ill will do to others?
If your compassion is an emotional state of mind, no matter how intense or moving or caring it is for others, it does not concern others, cannot be shared with others.
On the contrary if your compassion is your emotional state of your mind, you are applying force on your mind that not only stresses but conditions and degrades it and if you can induce others to make their minds similarly compassionate, you are inducing them to similarly suffer with debt accrued rather than merit.
Thus the only way your compassion may benefit others is you say or do things that do not harm them, make them happy (that is loving kindness not compassion), assist or help them. No matter how much you might help others, it does not mean they will be grateful to you, they will eliminate their ill will. Without them erasing their ill will, they can potentially attack you and that is the end of the peace that you seek to build with your compassion.
What can your ill will do to others? Your ill will which is forceful will stress, make restless and distract others, will provoke them to retaliate with deeds and words that are false or harmful.
Thus ill will definitely will provoke others to retaliate in kind and that is the end of the peace you strive with your compassion or whatever else you might nominate and the beginning of strife or hostility.
JUST BECAUSE YOU ARE COMPASSIONATE TO OTHERS DOES NOT MEAN THEY WILL RELINQUISH THEIR ILL WILL. EVEN IF YOU SHOW GENUINE GOODWILL TO OTHERS, IT MAY NOT STOP THEM FROM HAVING ILL WILL TOWARDS YOU, MAY NOT STOP THEM FROM HATING YOU WITHOUT REASON BUT THAT IS THE MOST ANYONE CAN DO, NOT PROVOKE OTHERS WITH ILL WILL. IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE GENUINE OR LASTING PEACE WITHOUT GOODWILL AND YOU CANNOT LEGISLATE GOODWILL IN OTHERS.
Goodwill is higher than compassion:
It is ill will and not the lack of compassion that according to the Buddha detains a being in the lower realms and it is goodwill (to all as to himself) and not compassion that the Buddha said led to one eon or Age in heaven.
The person who is perfect in goodwill will be perfect in his compassion but a person who is compassionate may not necessarily be perfect in his good will. Why is this so?
You may have a sword in hand with your defeated adversary’s head at your mercy and become so moved by your compassion in sparing him of his life not realizing that it takes ill will to have a sword in your hand and think of killing him in the first place.
Thus although he showed compassion in sparing his conquest his head, he has ill will in wielding a sword and entertain thoughts of killing.
It is impossible for a person of true or perfect goodwill to entertain thoughts of harming another let alone carry a sword and therefore the question that he will spare someone his life does not arise at all.
Therefore the person with perfect goodwill is higher than the person with compassion, will always have perfect compassion whilst the person of compassion does not (never) possess perfect goodwill.
What people mistake here for compassion may be mercifulness or sparing someone of his suffering or death at your hands. Whilst it may all be very emotionally evocative it is not necessarily without selfish motives, eg to take him or her as a slave, because he or she is attractive to you or to impress the gods.
These acts of mercy are usually accompanied by an emotional state of ‘feeling for others’ or appreciating the possible suffering of others as a result of your actions or words that because they are forceful, may colour negatively the person’s perspective and actions as compared to the person who is emotionless but can see the suffering others might suffer as a result of his actions. Therefore the person who sees with reason the harm that he can do is higher than the person who sees with emotion the harm his actions might do to others.
Whilst your emotional compassion may be gratifying to you, it only involves you and cannot do anything for others and it is a form of deluded self indulgence how wonderfully compassionate you are and does not compare with what you do or say that assists or benefits others, the bread and butter of compassion. Further the mental state of compassion is addictive, stressful and harms your mind.
YOU STILL HAVE TO TAKE UP A SWORD AND ENTERTAIN THOUGHTS OF KILLING A PERSON BEFORE YOU CAN BE COMPASSIONATE OR MERCIFUL IN SPARING HIM HIS LIFE BUT A PERSON OF IMMACULATE GOODWILL WILL NOT HARBOR THOUGHTS OF HARMING THE OTHER PERSON LET ALONE WIELD A SWORD SO THE QUESTION OF COMPASSIONATELY SPARING HIS LIFE DOES NOT ARISE AT ALL. THEREFORE GOODWILL IS HIGHER THAN COMPASSION OR MERCY.
Goodwill is the only final pathway to peace:
Any key to peace proposed may be true (does lead to peace) or false (does not lead to peace).
There can be no peace within oneself or with others without goodwill and whatever true key to peace can be traced to goodwill or must go through goodwill or the absence of ill will.
Any key to peace tendered that does not contain goodwill that requires the absence of ill will is false.
Without the absence of ill will, whatever peace within oneself and with others is an enforced unstable, stressful peace subject to disruption by force.
Because a person of compassion still harbours ill will (eg in wanting to kill and in holding a sword), his compassion for others (eg in sparing his defeated foe his life) is tainted, does not lead to true or everlasting peace.
Compassion can only mitigate the deleterious effects of ill will but only the abolition of ill will itself can finally bring to an end the deleterious effects of ill will (of which the denial of peace is just one) and deliver that person and all those of like mind to peace.
The absence of ill will is not a requisite for compassion but it is in the nature of things that one with perfect true goodwill is endowed with genuine motive-less unemotional calm clearly thinking compassion.
For instance it can be proposed that there cannot be peace within oneself and thence peace with others if one is restless and therefore the absence of restlessness is a valid key to peace in oneself and with others. But this key, the absence of restlessness is not a standalone entity but a product of ill will that drives one to falsely forcefully unnecessarily constantly change speed and loudness in one’s speech and motion for show to deceive, impress, please, intimidate or dominate others.
In the same way it is impossible for a person who is beset by stress and distraction to be at peace with himself and others but stress and distraction are by products of ill will that drives the person to adopt a forceful style in his perceiving, thinking, speaking and doing in the name of deceiving, pleasing, impressing, intimidating and dominating others.
WITHOUT GOODWILL THAT REQUIRES THE ABSENCE OF ILL WILL, THERE CANNOT BE PEACE WITHIN ONESELF OR WITH OTHERS. BECAUSE ALL BEINGS HERE, INCLUDING ANIMALS ARE CONSTANTLY BESET BY STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION THAT ARE THE INEVITABLE PRODUCTS OF THE FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL IN FABRICATING AN UNNECESSARY FOR SHOW STYLE IN THEIR PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING, THEY CANNOT BE AT PEACE WITH THEMSELVES OR OTHERS AND THERE CAN BE NO PEACE ON EARTH. WHAT REMAINS IS FOR THE PERSON TO DENY HIMSELF (BY NOT PARTAKING OF ILL WILL CARRIED THROUGH HAVING STYLE), CARRY HIS CROSS OF PERSECUTION AND EXIT THIS WORLD TO HEAVEN.
THERE IS EVEN FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL IN THE COMPASSION OF BEINGS HERE AND IT IS AN ALMOST INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIER FOR BEINGS TRAPPED HERE TO DEVELOP GENUINE GOODWILL BECAUSE THEY HAVE MISTAKEN THEIR FORCEFULNESS (THAT IS ALWAYS ILL WILL) FOR THEIR GOOD WILL. SO LONG AS YOU ARE UNWILLING TO RELINQUISH YOUR STYLE, UNWILLING TO STOP STRETCHING SYLLABLES, CHANGING SPEED AND LOUDNESS, YOU EVEN ENJOY TELLING LIES (ALL JOKES ARE FALSE OR ENJOYING THE MISFORTUNE OF OTHERS) AND HURTING OTHERS (OBSTRUCTING AND PESTERING OTHERS), WHATEVER COMPASSION OR OTHER KEY TO PEACE YOU MIGHT TOUT ARE MERELY HYPOCRISY OR EMPTY BABBLE WITHOUT CONVICTION.
NOT ONLY DO PEOPLE POSSESS CONSTANT ILL WILL, THEY THINK THEIR ILL WILL IS FUN AND GOOD AS THEY THINK THEIR STYLES OF SPEECH, DOING THINGS, POSTURES ARE TRUE AND GOOD, THEIR LIKES AND DISLIKES AND SMILES ARE GOOD & TRUE, THEIR JOKES ARE APPRECIATING TRUTH AND GOODNESS WHEN IT IS APPRECIATING FALSITY AND THE MISFORTUNE OF OTHERS.
Compassion:
There is compassion based on reason and compassion based on emotion:
Compassion that is based on reason and true is a seeing as it is or discerning and knowing or understanding the suffering that afflict others that leads to conduct that truly does not harm others in any way together with the saying or doing of things that assist others out of their suffering or benefit them.
As the Buddha said, this dharma is for one who delights in non complication not for one who delights in complication. If you delight in non complication then compassion is just this.
To those who delight in complication and they are always emotional, disturbed people, compassion is much more, even indefinable. Just as there is only one version of what happened but there are many possible versions of what did not happen, even so there are many versions of false emotional compassion depending on the imagination and delusion of the emotional person.
Thus false emotional compassion has a virtual addictive mental component that may be disproportionately large in the frequent emotional experience of sorrow or sadness anxious concern for the sufferings of others and this world and a dramatic conduct in speech and action component that projects a pained, anxious sympathy for others. Being merciful or undertaking actions that spare others of suffering is a manifestation of this emotional compassion. Amongst other motives, it gives the person a sense of power or control over the victim (that emotional people value highly) to determine the fate of others by sparing them their lives or punishment.
BECAUSE EMOTIONAL COMPASSION IS FALSE, IT IS UP TO THE PERSON TO DEFINE WHAT IT SHOULD BE AND SO THERE ARE MANY INDIVIDUAL INTERPRETATION OF WHAT COMPASSION SHOULD BE BUT WHAT IS INVARIABLE IS THAT THERE IS FORCEFULNESS OR ILL WILL UNDERLYING IT AND IT HAS MOTIVE.
GOODWILL HAS NO MOTIVE BUT IT HAS FULL MEANING. GOODWILL IS JUST THE ABSENCE OF FORCE IN THE WAY ONE SPEAKS OR DOES THINGS AND THE ABSENCE OF FORCE THAT IS REQUIRED TO FABRICATE WHAT IS FALSE OR HARMFUL TO SELF AND OTHERS. IT IS BECAUSE THE PERSON OF GOODWILL DOES NOT WANT TO SUFFER THAT HE DOES NOT USE FORCE. COMPASSION HAS MOTIVE OR INTENTION AND THE BUDDHA SAID INTENTION IS KAMMA.
The Buddha:
"Intention, I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.
"And what is the cause by which kamma comes into play? Contact is the cause by which kamma comes into play.
"And what is the diversity in kamma? There is kamma to be experienced in hell, kamma to be experienced in the realm of common animals, kamma to be experienced in the realm of the hungry shades, kamma to be experienced in the human world, kamma to be experienced in the world of the devas. This is called the diversity in kamma.
"And what is the result of kamma? The result of kamma is of three sorts, I tell you: that which arises right here & now, that which arises later [in this lifetime], and that which arises following that. This is called the result of kamma.
"And what is the cessation of kamma? From the cessation of contact is the cessation of kamma; and just this noble eightfold path -- right view, right resolve, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration -- is the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma.
"Now when a noble disciple discerns kamma in this way, the cause by which kamma comes into play in this way, the diversity of kamma in this way, the result of kamma in this way, the cessation of kamma in this way, & the path of practice leading to the cessation of kamma in this way, then he discerns this penetrative holy life as the cessation of kamma.
"'Kamma should be known. The cause by which kamma comes into play...The diversity in kamma...The result of kamma...The cessation of kamma...The path of practice for the cessation of kamma should be known.' Thus it has been said, and in reference to this was it said.
It takes force to deny peace and it takes the absence of force to establish peace:
Peace which is always calm and clearly thinking will automatically ensue if there is no unrest, strife or agitation or conflict going on.
You cannot have unrest, strife, agitation or conflict without the presence of opposing forces present either internally between one’s force of going against self and force of self preservation or externally between individuals or tribes or nations embodying force.
BECAUSE UNREST OR STRIFE WITHIN SELF AND WITH OTHERS NECESSITATES THE PRESENCE OF OPPOSING OR ANTAGONIZING FORCES, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF EFFORTLESS TRUE PEACE REQUIRES THE ABSENCE OF FORCE IF IT IS POSSIBLE.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT FORCE AND IF ALL BEINGS EXISTING IN THAT PLACE DO NOT USE FORCE THEN PEACE SHALL PREVAIL.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT USING FORCE IF ONE DID NOT USE FORCE TO STRETCH, CHANGE SPEED AND STRENGTH OF FORCE OF ONE’S STYLE OF PERCEIVING, THINKING, SPEAKING AND DOING THINGS.
IT IS POSSIBLE TO EXIST WITHOUT USING FORCE IF ONE DID USE FORCE TO FABRICATE FALSE OR HARMFUL SPEECH OR DEEDS WITH THE INTENTION OF DECEIVING, IMPRESSING, PLEASING, INTIMIDATING OR DOMINATING OTHERS.
BY SO DOING ONE WOULD EXIST FREE OF STRESS, RESTLESSNESS AND DISTRACTION AND ONE WOULD NOT PERSECUTE ALL OTHERS WHO COME INTO CONTACT WITH ONE AND THERE WILL BE PEACE AND HARMONY.
WHERE IN THIS EQUATION DO YOU FIND THE APPEARANCE OF COMPASSION? AT MOST COMPASSION IS AN ACCESSORY TO PEACE NOT THE KEY COMPONENT.
BECAUSE IT TAKES OPPOSING FORCES TO DENY PEACE, IT TAKES THE NEGATING OF FORCE OR GOODWILL (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO ESTABLISH PEACE.
Examining The Keys To Peace:
IT TAKES FORCE (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO DISRUPT PEACE AND IT WILL TAKE THE ABSENCE OF FORCE (AND NOTHING ELSE) TO RESTORE PEACE AND WHATEVER KEY TO PEACE THAT IS TRUE OR WORKS MUST ACT THROUGH DISCONTINUING THE PRESENCE OF FORCE THAT CAUSES STRIFE, UNREST OR AGITATION.
(No matter how you cannot see it is so, so long as there is objectively demonstrable forcefulness transmitted in your appearance, posture, style of speech or motion, so long will you be inviting others to react not respond in kind with force to you and that is the beginning of strife and the negating of true effortless peace. Only an uneasy truce or enforced breakable peace is possible.
And if you are person with style, a person who transmits force in your appearance, expressions, speech and motion, you are a hypocrite and emperor with no clothes talking about bringing peace to this world because the force in your style is constantly provoking others to return force and this is inviting strife that negates peace that you wax lyrical about.
When you screw up your face to express irritation or dislike, others can see the transmission of force that stirs their mental force and once mental force is stirred in you and him that is the end of any true peace. What is left is an enforced or uneasy peace to avoid open conflict)
There are many keys to peace that people can tout like prosperity, law and order, wisdom, discernment and virtue.
Law & order and prosperity are keys to relative enforced peace not absolute or true peace.
Prosperity is a form of bribery for people to maintain a status quo so that they can together enjoy their prosperity or the logic that ‘a full stomach is a happy one’.
Law and order is externally enforced or force coerced peace just as you can summon your mental force of self preservation to enforce a relative unstable mental peace.
True virtue is a matter of not stealing, killing, telling lies, tale bearing and indulging in intoxicants that is a key to peace in the sense of reducing or eliminating ill will and therefore virtue as a key to peace is via its practice of goodwill.
Again discernment or seeing things clearly as it is (not as you like or dislike it) may be a key to peace in the sense that discernment is needed to see that there is unnecessary force transmissions in the speech and conduct or people, there is falsity and harmfulness in what people say or do whose avoidance by lack of ill will on the part of that discerning person is the key to peace.
Wisdom again may be a key to peace in the sense that it is essential to see things clearly (that there is irrational force and force driven falsity and harmfulness in the behaviour of those in strife), understanding how force begets force to thence negate peace and arriving at the conclusion that goodwill or the absence of ill will or force brings peace.
When people talk of peace they talk of calm, of the absence of strife, unrest or conflict. Reason cannot disrupt calm, only force be it mental or physical can disrupt calm and cause strife, unrest or conflict.
IT IS THE PRESENCE AND CLASHING OF TWO OR MORE OPPOSING FORCES BE IT IN THE MIND OR PHYSICAL WORLD THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE, UNREST OR THE ABSENCE OF PEACE AND IT IS THE ABSENCE OR LACK OF CLASHING BETWEEN OPPOSING FORCES THAT WILL BRING PEACE. WHATEVER KEYS TO PEACE MUST BRING ABOUT THE ABSENCE OF FORCE OR END THE CLASH OF OPPOSING FORCES TO BRING ABOUT PEACE.
THEREFORE IN THE FINALITY OF THINGS IT IS ILL WILL OR THE USE OF FORCE TO ATTACK OTHERS EITHER THROUGH THE STYLE OF SPEECH OR CONDUCT THAT NECESSITATES AN UNNECESSARY USE OF FORCE OR THE SAYING OR DOING OF FALSE AND HARMFUL THINGS THAT IS THE CAUSE OF STRIFE, UNREST OR CONFLICT THAT NEGATES PEACE AND IT IS THE ABSENCE OF ILL WILL OR THE PRESENCE OF GOODWILL THAT WILL RESTORE PEACE, NOT COMPASSION OR ANYTHING ELSE.